Surface Modification Strategies for High-Performance Perovskite Quantum Dot Light-Emitting Diodes

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive review of surface modification techniques for perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) to enhance the performance and stability of light-emitting diodes (LEDs). Targeting researchers and scientists in materials science and optoelectronics, it explores the foundational role of surface chemistry in determining PQD optoelectronic properties, details advanced ligand engineering and passivation methodologies, addresses critical stability challenges, and validates these approaches through comparative performance analysis. The synthesis of recent research offers a strategic framework for developing next-generation, high-efficiency PQD-LEDs for display and lighting applications.

The Surface Science of Perovskite Quantum Dots: Understanding the Foundation of Luminescence and Stability

The ABX3 Crystal Structure and Its Intrinsic Defect Tolerance

The ABX₃ crystal structure, named after the naturally occurring mineral calcium titanate (CaTiO₃), provides the foundational framework for halide perovskite materials critical to modern optoelectronics, including light-emitting diodes (LEDs) [1]. This structure is characterized by a cubic unit cell where:

• A larger monovalent cation (e.g., Cs⁺, MA⁺, FA⁺) occupies the body-center position in a 12-fold cuboctahedral coordination [2] [1].
• A smaller divalent metal cation (e.g., Pb²⁺, Sn²⁺) resides at the cube corners in a 6-fold octahedral coordination, forming the [BX₆]⁴⁻ octahedron [2] [3].
• The X-site anion (a halogen: I⁻, Br⁻, Cl⁻) sits at the face centers, bridging the B-site cations [2] [1].

This arrangement, with a general chemical formula of ABX₃, exhibits remarkable structural and compositional flexibility. The Goldschmidt tolerance factor and octahedral factor are key parameters for predicting the stability of the perovskite structure, allowing for extensive substitution and mixing of ions at the A, B, and X sites to precisely tune material properties [3].

The Principle of Defect Tolerance

Defect tolerance in halide perovskites (HaPs) refers to the unique phenomenon where structural defects do not necessarily translate into detrimental electronic states within the bandgap that act as efficient charge recombination centers [4]. In conventional semiconductors (e.g., silicon, GaAs), such defects severely degrade performance, necessitating high-purity, single-crystal materials. In contrast, HaPs, even polycrystalline films processed from solution at low temperatures, can exhibit excellent optoelectronic properties, a characteristic explained by defect tolerance [4].

Direct experimental evidence for defect tolerance comes from comparing the structural quality of Pb-haplide perovskite single crystals with their optoelectronic characteristics. High-sensitivity measurements, including X-ray diffraction rocking curves, show that despite the presence of structural defects, these materials maintain high optoelectronic quality, as evidenced by their excellent emission and transport properties [4]. This indicates that the majority of structural defects in HaPs are "electrically benign" [4].

The defect tolerance in lead-halide perovskites is theorized to stem from several key electronic structure properties:

• The valence band maximum and conduction band minimum are primarily formed by anti-bonding coupling of Pb(6s) and I(5p) orbitals [4].
• This specific orbital contribution leads to a high dielectric constant and strong electronic screening, which can render the electrostatic potential of charged defects less effective at trapping charge carriers [4].
• Computational studies suggest that charge trapping at intrinsic defects may be suppressed by large, picosecond-scale fluctuations in the energy levels of defect states, a consequence of the soft, dynamic lattice [4].

Table 1: Key Evidence and Rationale for Defect Tolerance in ABX₃ Halide Perovskites

Evidence/Rationale	Description	Experimental/Computational Support
Bulk Optoelectronic Quality	High performance despite structural defects in bulk material [4].	XRD rocking curves, photoluminescence (PL) decay, transport measurements on single crystals [4].
Electronic Screening	High dielectric constant screens charge carrier trapping at defect sites [4].	Theory and computation of electronic structure and defect formation [4].
Soft, Dynamic Lattice	Low-frequency phonon modes and large, picosecond-level fluctuations of defect energy levels [4].	Combined molecular dynamics and density functional theory (DFT) computations [4].
Contrast with Classical Semiconductors	Performance less sensitive to grain boundaries and structural defects than Si or GaAs [4].	Comparative device performance of polycrystalline films prepared under mild conditions [4].

Implications for Perovskite Quantum Dots (PQDs) and LEDs

The principle of defect tolerance is profoundly significant for perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) used in light-emitting diodes (LEDs). The quantum confinement in PQDs enhances radiative recombination, making them exceptional emitters. While the ABX₃ bulk structure may be defect-tolerant, the high surface-to-volume ratio of PQDs means surface defects dominate their optoelectronic properties [5] [6]. Unpassivated surface defects, such as under-coordinated Pb²⁺ ions, become major sources of non-radiative recombination, quenching photoluminescence (PL) and reducing the external quantum efficiency (EQE) of LEDs [5] [6]. Therefore, research shifts from mitigating bulk defects to engineering surface chemistry via ligands to control the surface states of PQDs.

Diagram 1: Contrasting impact of defects in bulk perovskites versus perovskite quantum dots, highlighting the critical role of surface ligand engineering for PQD-based LEDs.

Surface Engineering Strategies for Defect Management

Surface ligand engineering is a critical protocol for passivating defects in PQDs, enhancing their performance in LEDs. Effective ligands coordinate with under-coordinated surface ions, suppressing non-radiative recombination pathways.

Ligand Exchange and Passivation Protocols

A robust protocol for ligand exchange on CsPbX₃ PQDs involves replacing native ligands (e.g., oleic acid, oleylamine) with functionalized ligands to improve passivation and imprint new functionalities [6].

Detailed Protocol: Enhanced Ligand Exchange with Ultrasonic Treatment

• Objective: To achieve high ligand exchange efficiency for improved spin selectivity and optoelectronic properties in chiral PQDs for spin-LEDs [6].
• Materials:
  • Pre-synthesized CsPbBr₃ PQDs: Capped with oleic acid (OAc) and oleylamine (OAm) ligands, dispersed in non-polar solvent (e.g., toluene, hexane) [6].
  • Chiral Ligand Solution: R- or S-methylbenzylamine (MBA) dissolved in a polar solvent (e.g., ethyl acetate) [6]. Other ligands like l-phenylalanine can be used for specific passivation [5].
  • Equipment: Ultrasonic bath, centrifuge, inert atmosphere glovebox.

Procedure:

• Preparation: Transfer the pristine PQD solution to a vial. Prepare the chiral ligand solution with a typical concentration of 10-20 mM [6].
• Mixing: Add the ligand solution to the PQD solution under vigorous stirring. The typical volume ratio of ligand solution to PQD solution is 1:1 [6].
• Ultrasonic Treatment: Place the mixture in an ultrasonic bath and treat for 10-20 minutes. The ultrasonic energy assists the desorption of original OAc/OAm ligands, promoting the adsorption of chiral ligands [6].
• Purification: Precipitate the PQDs by adding anti-solvent (e.g., methyl acetate) and centrifuging at 8000-10000 rpm for 5-10 minutes [6].
• Washing: Discard the supernatant and re-disperse the pellet in a clean solvent. Repeat the purification cycle 1-2 times to remove excess ligands and by-products [6].
• Storage: Finally, disperse the exchanged PQDs in an appropriate solvent (e.g., octane) for film deposition. Store in a dark and cool environment [6].

Troubleshooting Tips:

• Aggregation: If PQDs aggregate during exchange, reduce ultrasonic power or treatment time. Ensure anti-solvent is added slowly and with gentle stirring.
• Incomplete Passivation: Increase ligand concentration or extend ultrasonic treatment duration. Confirm the ligand is adequately dissolved in the solvent.
• PL Quenching: Optimize purification steps to remove unbound ligands effectively, which can introduce charge traps.

Quantitative Performance of Ligand Modifications

The effectiveness of surface ligand engineering is quantitatively assessed through enhancements in photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY), emission linewidth, and device efficiency.

Table 2: Impact of Surface Ligand Modification on the Optical Properties of CsPbI₃ PQDs [5]

Ligand Treatment	Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY) Enhancement	Key Findings and Mechanism
l-Phenylalanine (L-PHE)	+3%	Effective passivation of surface defects; demonstrated superior photostability, retaining >70% of initial PL intensity after 20 days of UV exposure [5].
Trioctylphosphine (TOP)	+16%	Coordination with undercoordinated Pb²⁺ ions effectively suppresses non-radiative recombination [5].
Trioctylphosphine Oxide (TOPO)	+18%	Strong coordination with surface Pb²⁺ ions, leading to the highest PLQY enhancement among the tested ligands [5].

For LED applications, this ligand engineering directly translates to improved device performance. Chiral CsPbBr₃ PQDs treated with R-/S-MBA via the ultrasonic-assisted ligand exchange protocol demonstrated high-performance spin-LEDs with an external quantum efficiency (EQE) of up to 16.8% and a high electroluminescence dissymmetric factor (gEL) of 0.285 [6]. This protocol synergistically enhances both spin selectivity and optoelectronic properties by improving chiral ligand coverage, which concurrently passivates surface defects and imprints chirality [6].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for PQD Surface Engineering and Characterization

Item/Category	Function/Application	Specific Examples
PQD Cores	Light-emitting material; platform for surface studies [5] [6].	CsPbI₃ PQDs (red emission), CsPbBr₃ PQDs (green emission) [5] [6].
Passivating Ligands	Coordinate with undercoordinated surface ions to suppress non-radiative recombination [5] [6].	L-Phenylalanine, Trioctylphosphine (TOP), Trioctylphosphine Oxide (TOPO), R-/S-Methylbenzylamine (MBA) [5] [6].
Precursor Salts	Synthesis of PQDs and precursor solutions for film deposition [5].	Cesium Carbonate (Cs₂CO₃), Lead Iodide (PbI₂) [5].
Solvents	Medium for synthesis, ligand exchange, purification, and film processing [5] [6].	1-Octadecene (non-polar), Dimethylformamide (polar), Ethyl Acetate (polar), Toluene (non-polar) [5] [6].
Characterization Equipment	Quantifying structural, optical, and electronic properties of surface-engineered PQDs [4] [5] [6].	Photoluminescence (PL) Spectrometer, X-ray Diffractometer (XRD), Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) with magnetic conductive probe (mCP-AFM) [4] [5] [6].

Diagram 2: A generalized experimental workflow for the surface engineering and characterization of perovskite quantum dots, from synthesis to device integration.

In the pursuit of high-performance perovskite quantum dot (PQD)-based light-emitting diodes (LEDs), the manipulation of material dimensions has emerged as a pivotal strategy. Low-dimensional halide perovskite nanostructures, including quantum dots (QDs), nanowires (NWs), and nanosheets (NSs), exhibit distinctive quantum confinement effects, adjustable bandgaps, superior carrier dynamics, and cost-effective solution processability [7]. A fundamental characteristic defining the behavior of these nanomaterials is their high surface-to-volume ratio (SVR), which becomes increasingly dominant as material dimensions shrink. This application note delineates the critical influence of SVR on the optoelectronic properties of PQDs, framed within a thesis investigating surface modification strategies. We provide a structured quantitative comparison, detailed experimental protocols for synthesis and surface modification, and essential reagent information to guide research in this field.

Theoretic Background: SVR and Nanostructure Properties

The high SVR in low-dimensional perovskites directly governs their performance and stability. In contrast to the continuous [BX6]4- octahedral network of traditional 3D perovskites, low-dimensional structures feature discrete perovskite units. This architectural difference profoundly enhances the Coulomb interaction between electrons and holes, resulting in significantly higher exciton binding energies and enabling efficient radiative recombination at room temperature [7]. Furthermore, the expansive surface area of PQDs, while beneficial for ligand anchoring and defect passivation, also presents a higher density of potential defect sites, such as uncoordinated lead atoms and halide vacancies, which can act as traps for charge carriers and instigate non-radiative recombination [7]. The high SVR also facilitates more extensive interactions with environmental factors like moisture and oxygen, making surface integrity a critical determinant of operational stability [8] [7]. Consequently, sophisticated surface modification protocols are not merely supplementary but are essential for achieving high photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) and device longevity.

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Low-Dimensional Halide Perovskite Nanostructures for Optoelectronics.

Nanostructure Type	Typical Dimensions	Key Optoelectronic Properties	Impact of High SVR	Primary Applications
0D Quantum Dots (QDs)	2-10 nm	High PLQY (>90%), narrow emission linewidth (FWHM ~20-30 nm), tunable bandgap [9] [7]	Dominant quantum confinement; vast surface for ligand binding and defect formation; high susceptibility to environmental degradation [7]	LEDs, displays, lasers [7]
1D Nanowires (NWs)	Diameter: 10-100 nm, Length: several µm	Efficient charge transport, high gain, ultrafast response [7]	Anisotropic charge transport; reduced grain boundaries in the long axis; surface states can scatter carriers [7]	Photodetectors, transistors [7]
2D Nanosheets (NSs)	Thickness: single/few layers, Lateral: >1 µm	Confined electron-hole pairs, enhanced PLQY and monochromaticity, excellent environmental stability from hydrophobic ligands [7]	Large, uniform emission surface; interlayer spacers block environmental ingress; surface ligands critically control stability [7]	LEDs, photocatalysis [7]

Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Synthesis of CsPbX3 PQDs via Hot-Injection Method

This protocol describes the synthesis of high-quality cesium lead halide (CsPbX₃) PQDs with tunable emission, adapted from established methods [7]. The hot-injection technique offers superior control over size and size distribution.

Workflow Overview

Materials and Equipment

• Chemicals: Cesium carbonate (Cs₂CO₃, 99.9%), Lead(II) bromide (PbBr₂, 99.999%), 1-Octadecene (ODE, 90%), Oleic acid (OA, 90%), Oleylamine (OAm, 70%), Octylamine (95%).
• Solvents: Toluene, Hexane, Acetone.
• Equipment: Three-neck round-bottom flask (100 mL), Schlenk line, Thermostatic heating mantle, Syringes and needles, Centrifuge.

Step-by-Step Procedure

• Cs-oleate Precursor: Combine 0.4 g Cs₂CO₃, 1.25 mL OA, and 20 mL ODE in a 50 mL flask. Dry and degas under vacuum at 120°C for 1 hour. Heat under N₂ atmosphere until all Cs₂CO₃ reacts, forming a clear solution (~150°C). Maintain at 100°C for use.
• PbX₂ Precursor: In a 100 mL three-neck flask, load 0.069 mmol PbBr₂, 5 mL ODE, 0.5 mL OA, and 0.5 mL OAm. Dry under vacuum at 120°C for 30 minutes.
• Nucleation and Growth: Under N₂ flow, raise the temperature of the Pb-precursor to 150°C. Rapidly inject 0.4 mL of the preheated Cs-oleate solution and stir vigorously.
• Reaction Quenching: After 5 seconds, immediately cool the reaction flask in an ice-water bath to terminate crystal growth.
• Purification: Transfer the crude solution to centrifuge tubes. Add an equal volume of acetone and centrifuge at 8,000 rpm for 10 minutes. Discard the supernatant and re-disperse the PQD pellet in 5-10 mL of toluene or hexane. Repeat centrifugation at 5,000 rpm for 5 minutes to remove any aggregates.
• Storage: Store the purified PQD solution in an inert atmosphere glovebox at 4°C for further use and characterization.

Protocol 2: Surface Passivation of PQDs using Bidentate Ligands

This protocol details the post-synthetic treatment of CsPbX₃ PQDs with 2-bromohexadecanoic acid (BHA) to significantly improve PLQY and photostability by passivating surface defects [7].

Workflow Overview

Materials and Equipment

• Chemicals: 2-Bromohexadecanoic acid (BHA, >95%), Purified CsPbX₃ PQDs in toluene.
• Solvents: Toluene, Ethyl Acetate.
• Equipment: Centrifuge, Vortex mixer, UV-Vis spectrophotometer, Fluorometer.

Step-by-Step Procedure

• PQD Preparation: Purify as-synthesized PQDs per Protocol 1 and disperse in toluene to a concentration of ~10 mg/mL.
• BHA Solution: Prepare a BHA solution in toluene at a concentration of 10 mM.
• Passivation Reaction: Add the BHA solution to the PQD solution with a molar ratio of BHA:Pb²⁺ between 1:1 and 3:1. Vortex the mixture for 30 seconds.
• Incubation: Stir the reaction mixture at room temperature for 2-4 hours.
• Purification: Precipitate the passivated PQDs by adding ethyl acetate (2:1 v/v to the PQD solution) and centrifuging at 8,000 rpm for 5 minutes. Re-disperse the pellet in toluene.
• Validation: Measure the absorption and photoluminescence spectra. The PLQY of the passivated PQDs is expected to be significantly enhanced, reaching values as high as 97% [7], indicating effective suppression of non-radiative recombination pathways.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 2: Essential Materials for PQD Synthesis and Surface Modification.

Reagent / Material	Function / Role	Key Characteristics & Notes
Cesium Carbonate (Cs₂CO₃)	Cesium cation (Cs⁺) precursor for ABX₃ structure [7]	High purity (≥99.9%) required for optimal luminescence and reduced impurities.
Lead(II) Bromide (PbBr₂)	Lead (B-site) and halide source [7]	High purity (≥99.999%) critical for minimizing defect states.
1-Octadecene (ODE)	Non-coordinating solvent [7]	Acts as a high-booint reaction medium. Must be purified and stored over molecular sieves.
Oleic Acid (OA) / Oleylamine (OAm)	Surface capping ligands [7]	Dynamic binding passivates surfaces; controls crystal growth; concentration affects morphology and stability.
2-Bromohexadecanoic Acid (BHA)	Bidentate passivating ligand [7]	The bromine moiety enhances binding to the PQD surface, providing robust passivation and boosting PLQY.
Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): Poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS)	Hole-injection layer (HIL) in PeLED devices [8] [10]	Facilitates efficient hole injection into the PQD emissive layer; forms a smooth, conductive film.
MXene Composites	Flexible electrode material [8]	Used in composite electrodes (e.g., with AgNWs, PEDOT:PSS) to optimize charge transport and heat dissipation in flexible devices.

In the development of perovskite quantum dot-based light-emitting diodes (PeLEDs), surface defects on PQDs are a primary source of non-radiative recombination centers, severely limiting device performance and stability. These defects trap charge carriers, promoting non-radiative energy loss through processes such as the Shockley-Read-Hall (SRH) mechanism, thereby reducing photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY), operational lifetime, and overall electroluminescence efficiency [11] [12] [13]. Within the broader research on surface modification for PeLEDs, the precise identification and characterization of these defects is a critical first step toward developing effective passivation strategies. This Application Note details the common surface defects in PQDs, provides protocols for their identification and quantification, and presents quantitative data on their impact, serving as a foundational guide for researchers aiming to mitigate non-radiative losses in optoelectronic devices.

Common Surface Defects and Their Quantitative Impact

Surface defects in PQDs primarily arise from incomplete surface passivation by organic ligands, leading to under-coordinated ions and structural imperfections at the nanocrystal surface [14]. The table below summarizes the primary defect types, their atomic-scale origins, and their specific impacts on device performance.

Table 1: Common Surface Defects in Perovskite Quantum Dots (PQDs) and Their Impact on Device Performance

Defect Type	Atomic Origin	Impact on PQD Properties & Device Performance
Lead Vacancies (V_Pb)	Missing Pb²⁺ ions in the crystal lattice	Acts as a hole trap; increases non-radiative recombination, reducing PLQY and open-circuit voltage (V_OC) in devices [12] [13].
Halide Vacancies (V_X)	Missing halide ions (I⁻, Br⁻, Cl⁻)	Creates shallow trap states; facilitates ion migration, leading to spectral instability and a slow EL response time in LEDs [11].
Under-coordinated Pb²⁺	Pb atoms not fully bonded to halides, often at edges/corners	Serves as a strong electron trap center; significantly reduces PLQY and external quantum efficiency (EQE) [11] [14].
Dangling Bonds	Unsatisfied bonds at the PQD surface, often from ligand loss	Introduces mid-gap states that are efficient SRH recombination centers; increases surface recombination velocity (S) and reduces carrier lifetime [13].

The presence of these defects directly enables non-radiative recombination. While the classic SRH model often assumes a single mid-gap defect level, a more complex two-level recombination process can occur. In this mechanism, one type of carrier is first captured at a defect level, forming a metastable state; this is followed by a rapid local structural change, after which the other carrier is captured and recombined through a different defect level. This process can enhance the non-radiative recombination rate by orders of magnitude, even for defects with relatively shallow energy levels [12].

Quantitative Characterization of Defects and Recombination

The efficacy of any surface modification is quantitatively assessed by measuring the reduction in defect density and the consequent enhancement in optical and electronic properties. The following table compiles key performance metrics from recent studies employing different surface modification strategies, highlighting the direct correlation between defect passivation and device improvement.

Table 2: Quantitative Impact of Surface Modification Strategies on PQD Properties and PeLED Performance

Surface Modification Strategy	PLQY	Average Recombination Lifetime (τ_avg)	Device EQE	EL Response Time	Reference
Ionic Liquid ([BMIM]OTF)	Increased from 85.6% to 97.1%	Increased from 14.26 ns to 29.84 ns	Improved from 7.57% to 20.94%	Reduced by over 75%; achieved 700 ns	[11]
Deep Eutectic Solvent (DES) Ligands	Improved from 18.7% to 31.85%	Not Specified	Not Specified	Not Specified	[15]
SiO₂ Encapsulation (in s-MSNs)	Achieved 90.0%	Not Specified	Not Specified	Not Specified	[16]
Unpassivated/Control PQDs (Baseline)	Low (Reference)	Short (Reference)	Low (Reference)	Slow (Reference)	[11] [15]

Experimental Protocols for Defect Identification and Analysis

Protocol: Time-Resolved Photoluminescence (TRPL) for Recombination Kinetics

Objective: To determine the carrier recombination dynamics and quantify the relative rates of radiative and non-radiative recombination in PQD samples.

Materials:

• Pulsed Laser Source: Wavelength suitable for bandgap excitation (e.g., ~400 nm for CsPbBr₃).
• Time-Correlated Single Photon Counting (TCSPC) system or a streak camera.
• Spectrometer with high spectral resolution.
• Cryostat (for temperature-dependent studies).
• PQD sample in solution or as a solid film.

Procedure:

• Sample Preparation: Deposit a homogeneous film of PQDs on a clean substrate (e.g., quartz) or place the solution in a quartz cuvette.
• System Calibration: Calibrate the TRPL system using a standard fluorophore with a known lifetime.
• Data Acquisition: Excite the sample with a low-intensity pulsed laser to avoid non-linear effects like Auger recombination. Record the photoluminescence decay curve at the peak emission wavelength.
• Data Fitting: Fit the decay curve using multi-exponential functions (e.g., bi- or tri-exponential). The function is typically: I(t) = A₁exp(-t/τ₁) + A₂exp(-t/τ₂) + A₃exp(-t/τ₃) + ...
• Analysis: Calculate the amplitude-weighted average lifetime (τavg). A longer τavg generally indicates a lower density of non-radiative trap states, as seen in [11] where τ_avg increased after defect passivation. The presence of multiple time constants can reveal different recombination pathways (e.g., band-edge recombination, trap-assisted recombination).

Protocol: Measuring External Quantum Efficiency (EQE) of PeLEDs

Objective: To quantify the efficiency of a light-emitting diode by measuring the number of photons emitted per electron injected.

Materials:

• Completed PeLED device on a substrate.
• Source Measure Unit (SMU).
• Integrating sphere coupled to a calibrated spectrometer.
• Software for controlling the SMU and spectrometer.

Procedure:

• Device Connection: Place the PeLED inside the integrating sphere and connect its electrodes to the SMU.
• Light Emission Measurement: Drive the device with a defined current density using the SMU. The emitted light is collected by the integrating sphere, ensuring capture of all photons regardless of angle.
• Spectral Acquisition: The spectrometer measures the electroluminescence (EL) spectrum of the captured light.
• EQE Calculation: The EQE is calculated using the formula: EQE = (Number of photons emitted per second) / (Number of electrons injected per second) = (Luminous Flux / Photon Energy) / (Current / Elementary Charge). The software typically performs this calculation directly. A higher EQE signifies more efficient charge injection and radiative recombination, directly reflecting successful defect passivation [11].

Pathways and Workflows for Defect Management

The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow for identifying surface defects and developing effective passivation strategies, integrating the characterization techniques and performance metrics discussed.

Diagram 1: Workflow for PQD Defect Management. This chart outlines the process from quantum dot synthesis to performance enhancement, linking defect identification, characterization, passivation strategies, and final device outcomes.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Effective surface modification relies on specific chemical reagents. The table below lists key materials used for passivating surface defects in PQDs.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for Surface Passivation of PQDs

Reagent / Material	Function / Mechanism	Key Outcome / Performance Benefit
Ionic Liquid [BMIM]OTF	Enhances crystallinity and passivates surface defects via coordination of [BMIM]+ with Br⁻ and OTF− with Pb²⁺. Reduces charge injection barrier.	Increased PLQY to 97.1%; boosted EQE to 20.94%; achieved nanosecond EL response (700 ns) [11].
Deep Eutectic Solvent (DES)	Acts as an organic ligand, forming a hydrogen-bonding network for strong surface binding and defect passivation.	Enhanced fluorescence intensity by 144%; improved PLQY from 18.7% to 31.85% [15].
Surface-functionalized Mesoporous Silica Nanospheres (s-MSNs) & SiO₂	Provides physical encapsulation, shielding PQDs from environmental factors (O₂, H₂O) and passivating surface defects.	Achieved high PLQY of 90.0% and significantly enhanced environmental stability [16].
Amino Acid Ligands	Provides dual passivation for PQD solar cells; chelates under-coordinated surface ions.	Improved photovoltaic performance and stability of CsPbI₃ quantum dot solar cells [14].

The Critical Role of Surface Ligands in Stabilizing the Perovskite Lattice

The intrinsic ionic nature of perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) renders their lattice structure highly dynamic and susceptible to degradation, primarily through the formation of surface defects such as uncoordinated lead ions (Pb²⁺) and halide vacancies [5] [17]. These defects act as non-radiative recombination centers, quenching photoluminescence and undermining the performance of PQD-based light-emitting diodes (PeLEDs). Surface ligand engineering emerges as a critical strategy to address this instability. By forming coordinated bonds with undercoordinated surface ions, ligands effectively passivate defects, suppress ion migration, and enhance the overall robustness of the perovskite lattice [18] [19]. This application note details the mechanisms, quantitative outcomes, and practical protocols for employing surface ligands to stabilize the perovskite lattice, with a specific focus on applications in PeLEDs.

Ligand Classification and Binding Mechanisms

Surface ligands for PQDs can be categorized based on their binding affinity, molecular structure, and the resulting impact on material properties. The choice of ligand directly influences the optoelectronic quality and stability of the final PQD solid film.

Table 1: Classification and Characteristics of Key Surface Ligands for PQDs

Ligand Type	Representative Examples	Binding Mechanism	Key Advantages	Considerations
Lewis Base Ligands	Trioctylphosphine Oxide (TOPO), Triphenylphosphine Oxide (TPPO) [5] [17]	Coordinate with undercoordinated Pb²⁺ sites via electron-donating oxygen atoms [5].	Strong covalent binding; effective suppression of non-radiative recombination [17].	Requires dissolution in non-polar solvents (e.g., octane) to prevent PQD surface damage [17].
Ionic Short-Chain Ligands	Phenethylammonium Iodide (PEAI) [18] [17]	Ammonium group occupies A-site cation vacancies; anionic group (e.g., I⁻) passivates halide vacancies [18].	Improves inter-dot charge transport compared to long-chain ligands [17].	Labile ionic bonding can lead to ligand loss; may not fully suppress phase transition [18].
Multifunctional Anchoring Ligands	2-thiophenemethylammonium iodide (ThMAI) [18]	Thiophene ring (Lewis base) binds to Pb²⁺; ammonium group occupies Cs⁺ vacancies [18].	Multidentate binding enhances passivation and restores beneficial lattice strain [18].	Molecular design is complex to ensure simultaneous binding of multiple functional groups.
Multi-Site Binding Ligands	Sb(SU)₂Cl₃ complex [19]	Coordinates with up to four adjacent undercoordinated Pb²⁺ ions via Se and Cl atoms [19].	Creates a robust, cross-linked surface network; dramatically increases defect formation energy [19].	Synthesis of the complex can be more involved than for simple organic ligands.

Quantitative Impact of Ligands on PQD Properties

The effectiveness of surface ligands is quantitatively reflected in key performance metrics of PQDs and their resulting devices. The following table summarizes experimental data from recent studies.

Table 2: Quantitative Performance Metrics of Ligand-Modified PQDs

Ligand Strategy	Material System	Optical Performance	Device Performance & Stability	Key Outcome
Lewis Base Passivation (TPPO in octane) [17]	CsPbI₃ PQD Solar Cells	Increased PL intensity after ligand exchange [17].	PCE: 15.4%; Ambient Stability: >90% of initial PCE after 18 days [17].	Non-polar solvent prevents surface damage during treatment.
Multifunctional Anchoring (ThMAI) [18]	CsPbI₃ PQD Solar Cells	Improved carrier lifetime; uniform PQD orientation [18].	PCE: 15.3%; Ambient Stability: 83% of initial PCE after 15 days (vs. 8.7% for control) [18].	Simultaneously passivates defects and restores lattice strain.
Ligand-Assisted Purification (OA/OAm addition) [20]	Mixed-Halide CsPbBr₃₋ₓIₓ PNCs	Achieved near-unity PLQY for both green- and red-emissive NCs [20].	Enhanced color purity for display applications [20].	Prevents ligand detachment during anti-solvent washing.
Multi-Site Binding (Sb(SU)₂Cl₃) [19]	FAPbI₃ Perovskite Film	Enhanced crystallinity and reduced defect density [19].	PCE: 25.03% (air-processed); T80 Lifetime: ~2.7 years (shelf storage) [19].	Unprecedented stability for ambient-fabricated devices.

Experimental Protocols

Protocol: Surface Passivation with Covalent Lewis Base Ligands

This protocol describes the post-synthetic treatment of CsPbI₃ PQD solids with TPPO to achieve stable and highly luminescent films, adapted from [17].

Research Reagent Solutions:

• TPPO Solution in Octane: Dissolve triphenylphosphine oxide (TPPO) in anhydrous octane at a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL. The non-polar octane solvent is critical to prevent stripping of surface ions from the PQDs.
• PQD Solid Film: CsPbI₃ PQD films deposited on a substrate via layer-by-layer (LbL) spin-coating, with long-chain oleate/oleylamine ligands exchanged for short-chain ionic ligands (e.g., acetate and phenethylammonium iodide) using standard procedures [17].

Procedure:

• Film Preparation: Fabricate a conductive CsPbI₃ PQD solid film of desired thickness using the standard LbL method and ligand exchange process.
• TPPO Treatment: Dynamically spin-coat the TPPO solution in octane onto the freshly prepared PQD solid film at 3000 rpm for 30 seconds.
• Washing: Gently rinse the film with pure octane to remove any unbound TPPO ligand.
• Drying: Anneal the film on a hotplate at 70°C for 5 minutes to remove residual solvent.

Validation:

• Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy: Confirm the presence of TPPO on the PQD surface by detecting characteristic P=O stretching vibrations.
• Photoluminescence (PL) Spectroscopy: Measure the PL intensity and lifetime. A significant increase in both indicates successful passivation of non-radiative recombination centers [17].

Protocol: Ligand-Assisted Purification of Mixed-Halide PQDs

This protocol outlines a purification strategy that incorporates ligand supplementation to maintain high photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) by minimizing ligand loss, adapted from [20].

Research Reagent Solutions:

• Crude PQD Solution: As-synthesized mixed-halide (e.g., CsPbBr₃₋ₓIₓ) PQDs in a non-polar solvent like hexane.
• Ligand Supplement: A mixture of oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OAm) in a 1:1 volume ratio.
• Anti-Solvent: Anhydrous tert-butanol (t-BuOH).

Procedure:

• Ligand Addition: To the crude PQD solution, add a controlled amount of the OA/OAm ligand supplement (e.g., 0.1 mL per 10 mL of crude solution). Mix thoroughly.
• Precipitation: Slowly add a reduced volume of anti-solvent (e.g., 3 mL of t-BuOH) to the mixture to induce precipitation. Using a minimized volume of anti-solvent is key to reducing ligand detachment [20].
• Centrifugation: Centrifuge the mixture at 15,000 rpm for 10 minutes. A tightly packed precipitate will form.
• Re-dispersion: Carefully decant the supernatant and re-disperse the purified PQD precipitate in an appropriate anhydrous solvent (e.g., hexane or toluene) for further use.

Validation:

• Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY): Measure the PLQY of the re-dispersed PQDs using an integrating sphere. This method has been shown to achieve near-unity PLQY [20].
• Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR): Quantify the ligand density on the purified PQDs to confirm effective retention of surface passivation.

Ligand Binding Mechanisms and Experimental Workflow

The following diagrams illustrate the multi-site binding mechanism of an advanced ligand and the general workflow for fabricating and passivating PQD solids.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Reagents for Ligand Engineering in PQDs

Reagent / Material	Function / Application	Key Consideration
Trioctylphosphine Oxide (TOPO) [5]	Lewis base ligand for passivating uncoordinated Pb²⁺ defects.	Showed a 16% PL enhancement in CsPbI₃ PQDs [5].
Triphenylphosphine Oxide (TPPO) [17]	Covalent short-chain ligand for post-treatment passivation.	Must be dissolved in non-polar solvents (e.g., octane) to preserve the PQD surface [17].
2-Thiophenemethylammonium Iodide (ThMAI) [18]	Multifunctional ligand for strain restoration and defect passivation.	Its larger ionic size helps restore beneficial tensile strain on the PQD surface [18].
Oleic Acid (OA) / Oleylamine (OAm) [20]	Standard long-chain ligands for synthesis; used as supplements during purification.	Adding small quantities prior to anti-solvent washing prevents detachment and preserves PLQY [20].
Sb(SU)₂Cl₃ Complex [19]	Multi-site binding passivator for dramatically enhanced stability.	Its quadruple-site binding configuration massively increases defect formation energy [19].
Non-Polar Solvents (e.g., Octane) [17]	Medium for post-synthetic ligand exchange treatments.	Prevents the polar-solvent-induced loss of surface ions and ligands from PQDs [17].

In the development of perovskite quantum dot (PQD)-based light-emitting diodes (LEDs), surface modification is a critical determinant of device performance. The dynamic nature of the ligands passivating the PQD surface directly governs two pivotal properties: the photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY), indicative of optoelectronic quality, and charge transport, essential for electrical efficiency. Ligand dynamics encompass the binding affinity, which influences passivation stability, and the resultant surface coverage, which affects both defect passivation and inter-dot coupling. This application note details the quantitative relationships, measurement protocols, and practical methodologies for engineering ligand dynamics to achieve high-performance PQD-LEDs, framed within a broader thesis on surface modification strategies.

Quantitative Data on Ligand Impact

The properties of ligands, including their binding energy and steric effects, directly correlate with key performance metrics of PQDs and their resulting devices. The data below summarizes these critical relationships.

Table 1: Impact of Ligand Type on PQD Performance Metrics

Ligand Type	Binding Energy (eV)	Reported PLQY	Exciton Binding Energy (meV)	Key Characteristics and Impact
Oleate (OA) / Oleylamine (OAm)	-0.22 / -0.18 [21]	Low / Variable [22]	39.1 (Control) [21]	Dynamic binding; long chains hinder charge transport; low coverage [21] [22].
Formamidine Thiocyanate (FASCN)	-0.91 [21]	Notable Improvement [21]	76.3 [21]	Bidentate, short-chain, liquid ligand; tight binding; high conductivity [21].
Multidentate Ligands	High (General)	High [22]	Information Missing	Improved stability via multiple binding points; reduces ligand loss [22].

Table 2: Correlations between Ligand Properties and Device Performance

Ligand Property	Impact on PLQY	Impact on Charge Transport	Experimental Evidence
High Binding Affinity	Increases (Effective trap passivation) [21]	Improves (Stable surface coverage) [21]	4x higher binding energy vs. oleate; suppressed ligand desorption [21].
Full Surface Coverage	Increases (Reduces non-radiative sites) [21]	Improves (Reduces interfacial traps) [21]	FASCN treatment yields full coverage; eliminates interfacial quenching centers [21].
Short Chain Length	Secondary Effect	Significantly Improves (Reduces inter-dot distance)	FASCN (C<3) enables 8x higher film conductivity [21].

Experimental Protocols

Protocol: Post-Synthesis Ligand Exchange with FASCN

This protocol describes the treatment of synthesized CsPbX₃ PQDs with formamidine thiocyanate (FASCN) to enhance binding affinity and surface coverage [21].

• Materials:

  • Pre-synthesized CsPbX₃ PQDs (e.g., FAPbI₃), capped with oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OAm) [21].
  • Solvent: Anhydrous toluene or hexane.
  • Ligand Solution: 10 mM Formamidine thiocyanate (FASCN) in isopropanol [21].
  • Centrifuge and capable of 10,000 rpm.
  • Inert Atmosphere: Nitrogen or argon glovebox.

• Procedure:

  1. PQD Purification: Transfer the crude PQD solution to centrifuge tubes. Add a non-solvent (e.g., ethyl acetate) to precipitate the QDs. Centrifuge at 10,000 rpm for 5 minutes. Discard the supernatant and re-disperse the pellet in 1 mL of anhydrous toluene.
  2. Ligand Treatment: To the purified PQD solution, add the 10 mM FASCN solution in a 1:1 volume ratio. Vortex the mixture vigorously for 30 seconds to ensure complete mixing.
  3. Incubation: Allow the mixture to stand for 10 minutes at room temperature to facilitate ligand exchange.
  4. Purification of Treated PQDs: Precipitate the FASCN-treated PQDs by adding a non-solvent (e.g., methyl acetate). Centrifuge at 10,000 rpm for 5 minutes. Discard the supernatant containing displaced oleate ligands and excess FASCN.
  5. Redispersion: Redisperse the final pellet in 1-2 mL of anhydrous hexane or toluene for further film fabrication or characterization.

Protocol: Measuring Binding Affinity via DFT Calculation

Computational determination of ligand binding energy (E₆) provides a quantitative metric for predicting ligand stability on the PQD surface [21].

• Software Requirement: Density-Functional Theory (DFT) code (e.g., VASP, Quantum ESPRESSO).
• Model Setup:
  • Surface Model: Construct a slab model of a stable Pb-rich (100) surface of CsPbX₃. A minimum of 3-4 atomic layers is recommended, with the bottom 1-2 layers fixed.
  • Ligand Model: Isolate the functional head group of the ligand (e.g., -SCN for FASCN, -COO⁻ for OA).
• Calculation Parameters:
  • Functional: Use a generalized gradient approximation (GGA) functional like PBE.
  • Basis Set: Employ plane-wave basis sets with a cutoff energy of 400-500 eV.
  • k-points: Use a Γ-centered k-point grid for surface Brillouin zone sampling.
  • Convergence: Set energy convergence criteria to 10⁻⁵ eV and force convergence to 0.01 eV/Å.
• Energy Calculation:
  • Calculate the total energy of the optimized bare surface (Esurface).
  • Calculate the total energy of the isolated ligand molecule in a vacuum (Eligand).
  • Calculate the total energy of the surface with the ligand adsorbed at the most stable coordination site (E_complex).
• Analysis:
  • Compute the binding energy using the formula: E₆ = Ecomplex - (Esurface + E_ligand). A more negative E₆ value indicates stronger, more favorable binding [21].

Visualization of Ligand Dynamics and Impact

The following diagrams, generated using Graphviz, illustrate the core concepts and experimental workflows.

Ligand Impact on PQD Performance

Post-Synthesis Ligand Exchange Workflow

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Materials for Ligand Engineering Studies

Reagent / Material	Function / Application	Key Rationale
Formamidine Thiocyanate (FASCN)	Bidentate ligand for post-synthesis treatment [21].	Short-chain liquid ligand with high binding energy (-0.91 eV); enables high surface coverage and conductivity [21].
Oleic Acid (OA) & Oleylamine (OAm)	Standard L-type and X-type ligands for in-situ synthesis [22].	Most common ligands for nucleation/growth control; dynamic binding leads to instability, serving as a baseline for improvement [22].
1,2-Ethanedithiol (EDT)	Short-chain bidentate crosslinker for solid-state films [23].	Facilitates the formation of conductive NC solids; used in layer-by-layer deposition for photovoltaic devices [23].
Lead Halide Salts (PbX₂)	Inorganic precursors for PQD synthesis.	Source of Pb²⁺ and halide ions (Cl⁻, Br⁻, I⁻) for the perovskite lattice formation.
Cesium Carbonate (Cs₂CO₃)	Cesium precursor for all-inorganic CsPbX₃ PQDs.	Provides Cs⁺ ions upon reaction with acids in the synthesis mixture.
Anhydrous Solvents	Medium for synthesis and processing (e.g., Octadecene, Toluene).	High-purity, water-free solvents prevent degradation of ionic perovskite crystals during synthesis and ligand exchange.

Advanced Surface Engineering Techniques: From Ligand Chemistry to Practical Device Integration

In the pursuit of high-performance perovskite quantum dot-based light-emitting diodes (PQD-LEDs), surface modification has emerged as a critical research frontier. The intrinsic ionic nature and dynamic ligand binding of perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) create a high density of surface defects that serve as non-radiative recombination centers, severely limiting both device efficiency and operational stability [22] [21]. Ligand passivation strategies directly address this fundamental challenge by coordinating with undercoordinated surface ions—primarily Pb²⁺ and halide anions—to suppress trap states and enhance optoelectronic properties. This application note provides a systematic examination of three strategically significant ligand classes: conventional oleylamine, phosphine-based trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO), and carboxylic acids, detailing their performance characteristics, quantitative outcomes, and implementation protocols for PQD-LED applications.

Ligand Functions and Performance Comparison

The Role of Ligands in PQD Stability and Performance

Ligands bound to the PQD surface serve dual critical functions: they passivate surface defects to enhance photoluminescence and provide a steric barrier to maintain colloidal stability and prevent aggregation [22]. The binding strength, molecular structure, and coordination mode of these ligands directly determine the extent of defect passivation and the electrical conductivity of PQD films. Strong, stable binding suppresses ligand desorption and associated defect regeneration, while compact ligand structures enhance inter-dot charge transport—both essential for efficient PQD-LED operation [24] [21].

Quantitative Comparison of Ligand Performance

The table below summarizes key performance metrics for the featured ligand types, as established in recent literature.

Table 1: Performance Comparison of Ligand Passivation Strategies

Ligand Type	Specific Ligand	Binding Group	PLQY Enhancement	Stability Performance	Key Advantages
Conventional Amine	Oleylamine (OAm)	Amine Group	Not Quantified	Limited; dynamic binding leads to detachment [22]	Facilitates synthesis & crystal growth [22]
Phosphine Oxide	Trioctylphosphine Oxide (TOPO)	P=O Group	18% PL enhancement [5]	Superior photostability [5]	Strong coordination with Pb²⁺; effective defect passivation [5]
Carboxylic Acid	Oleic Acid (OA)	Carboxyl Group	Not Quantified	Limited; dynamic binding leads to detachment [22]	Chelates with lead atoms; inhibits aggregation [22]
Bidentate Ligand	Formamidine Thiocyanate (FASCN)	Thiocyanate Group	Notable PLQY improvement [21]	Excellent thermal & humidity stability [21]	Short chain, bidentate binding; high surface coverage & conductivity [21]
Polymer Ligand	PVP/PEG	Carbonyl & Ether Groups	76% PLQY achieved [25]	>96% PL retention after 50h UV/humidity [25]	Multi-point attachment; robust physical barrier [25]

Table 2: Electrical and Optoelectronic Properties of Ligand-Modified PQD Films

Ligand Treatment	Film PLQY	Exciton Binding Energy (meV)	Relative Conductivity	LED Device Performance (EQE)
Oleate-capped (Control)	Low (Reference)	39.1 [21]	Reference	Low (Reference)
FASCN Treatment	High	76.3 [21]	8x higher [21]	~23% (NIR-I LEDs) [21]
Bilateral TSPO1	79% (from 43%) [24]	Not Reported	Not Reported	18.7% [24]

Experimental Protocols

In Situ Ligand Passivation During Synthesis

This protocol describes the hot-injection synthesis of CsPbI₃ PQDs with simultaneous surface passivation using TOPO, adapted from established methodologies [5].

Research Reagent Solutions:

Table 3: Essential Reagents for PQD Synthesis and Passivation

Reagent Name	Function/Role	Specifications
Cesium Carbonate (Cs₂CO₃)	Cesium (Cs⁺) precursor	99% Purity
Lead Iodide (PbI₂)	Lead (Pb²⁺) and Iodide (I⁻) precursor	99% Purity
1-Octadecene (ODE)	Non-coordinating solvent	Anhydrous
Oleic Acid (OA)	Conventional ligand (Carboxylic acid)	90% Technical Grade
Oleylamine (OAm)	Conventional ligand (Amine)	90% Technical Grade
Trioctylphosphine (TOP)	Phosphorus precursor & ligand	99% Purity
Trioctylphosphine Oxide (TOPO)	Phosphine oxide ligand	99% Purity
L-Phenylalanine (L-PHE)	Bidentate amino acid ligand	98% Purity

Step-by-Step Procedure:

• Precursor Preparation: In a three-neck flask, combine 0.2 mmol Cs₂CO₃, 5 mL ODE, and 0.5 mL OA. Heat the mixture to 120°C under inert gas (N₂ or Ar) with constant stirring until the Cs₂CO₃ is completely dissolved, forming a clear Cs-oleate solution. Maintain this solution at 100°C for subsequent use.
• Reaction Mixture Setup: In a separate 50 mL three-neck flask, load 0.2 mmol PbI₂, 5 mL ODE, 1 mL OA, and 1 mL OAm. Add the specific ligand modifier (e.g., 0.2 mmol TOPO) at this stage for in situ passivation.
• Degassing and Heating: Evacuate the PbI₂-containing flask under vacuum with stirring at 100°C for 60 minutes to remove residual oxygen and water. Then, purge the flask with inert gas and raise the temperature to the target reaction temperature of 170°C [5].
• Hot-Injection and Nucleation: Rapidly inject 1.5 mL of the preheated Cs-oleate solution into the vigorously stirring reaction flask. The reaction mixture will immediately turn turbid, indicating rapid nucleation of PQDs.
• Crystallization and Growth: Allow the reaction to proceed for 10-15 seconds to facilitate PQD growth and crystallization.
• Quenching and Purification: Immediately cool the reaction flask using an ice-water bath to terminate the reaction. Centrifuge the crude solution at high speed (e.g., 12,000 rpm for 10 minutes) to precipitate the PQDs. Carefully discard the supernatant and re-disperse the pellet in a non-polar solvent like hexane or toluene. Repeat this centrifugation and re-dispersion cycle at least twice to remove unreacted precursors and excess ligands.
• Storage: Store the purified PQD ink in an inert atmosphere glovebox or sealed vials to prevent degradation.

Post-Synthesis Ligand Exchange

Post-synthesis treatment is highly effective for introducing short, conductive ligands or replacing weakly-bound native ligands to enhance charge transport in PQD films [26] [21].

Procedure for Solvent-Mediated Ligand Exchange:

• PQD Solid Film Preparation: Deposit a thin film of purified, oleate-capped PQDs onto the target substrate via spin-coating or drop-casting.
• Ligand Solution Preparation: Prepare a treatment solution of short-chain ligands (e.g., 5-10 mg/mL choline halides or formamidine thiocyanate (FASCN)) in a protic solvent with appropriate dielectric constant and acidity, such as 2-pentanol [26] [21].
• Film Treatment: Gently drop-cast the ligand solution onto the PQD film and let it incubate for 30-60 seconds. The solvent mediates the exchange, where short ligands in the solution replace the long-chain oleylamine/oleic acid on the PQD surface.
• Rinsing and Annealing: Spin the substrate to remove excess treatment solution and gently rinse with a pure 2-pentanol solvent to remove the displaced ligands. Finally, anneal the film at a mild temperature (e.g., 70°C for 10 minutes) to remove residual solvent and consolidate the film.

Advanced and Emerging Strategies

Bilateral Interfacial Passivation

For device integration, a bilateral passivation strategy can drastically enhance performance. This involves evaporating or spin-coating organic molecules (e.g., TSPO1, a phosphine oxide) onto both the top and bottom interfaces of the QD film within the LED device stack [24]. This method passivates defects introduced during film assembly and shields the PQDs from damaging interactions with charge transport layers, leading to reported maximum external quantum efficiency (EQE) of 18.7% and a 20-fold enhancement in operational lifetime [24].

All-Polymer Ligand Systems

Replacing conventional ligands entirely with polymer matrices represents a radical approach for extreme stability. A combination of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) can be used to synthesize and passivate CsPbBr₃ PQDs at room temperature without OA or OAm [25]. This strategy achieves excellent properties, including 76% PLQY and remarkable stability, retaining 96.81% of initial PL after 50 hours under extreme conditions (80% relative humidity and high-intensity UV) [25].

Workflow and Pathway Diagrams

The following diagram illustrates the strategic decision-making pathway for selecting and implementing ligand passivation strategies, from objective definition to final application.

The experimental workflow for synthesizing and passivating PQDs, from precursor preparation to final film treatment, is outlined in the diagram below.

The strategic selection and implementation of ligand passivation are fundamental to advancing PQD-LED technology. While conventional ligands like oleylamine and oleic acid facilitate synthesis, their weak binding limits device performance. Phosphine-based ligands (TOPO) and advanced strategies using bidentate molecules (FASCN) or polymer systems (PVP/PEG) demonstrate superior defect passivation and stability by enabling stronger coordination and higher surface coverage. The optimal ligand strategy is application-dependent, requiring careful consideration of the trade-offs between conductivity, stability, and photoluminescence efficiency. Future developments will likely focus on sophisticated multi-dentate ligands and composite passivation schemes that collectively address the multifaceted challenges of surface defects, ion migration, and charge transport in PQD films.

Innovative Pseudohalide Engineering for Defect Suppression and Halide Migration Inhibition

Within the field of perovskite quantum dot (PQD)-based light-emitting diodes (LEDs), achieving high efficiency and operational stability is paramount for commercialization. A significant challenge is inherent material instability, primarily caused by defect-mediated non-radiative recombination and ion migration, particularly halide migration, which leads to phase segregation and spectral shift. This document details innovative application notes and protocols on pseudohalide engineering, a cutting-edge surface modification strategy that effectively suppresses defects and inhibits halide migration in perovskites. By integrating these methodologies into your research on PQD-based LEDs, you can significantly enhance the optoelectronic performance and longevity of your devices.

Pseudohalide Engineering: Mechanisms and Quantitative Benefits

Pseudohalides are anions whose chemical behavior resembles that of true halides but often with enhanced functionality due to their molecular nature. Examples include thiocyanate (SCN−), trifluoroacetate (TFA−), and tricyanomethanide (C4N3−). Their incorporation into perovskite structures, either as direct substitutes for halides or as surface-modifying ligands, addresses core instability issues through multiple synergistic mechanisms.

Table 1: Mechanisms of Action for Key Pseudohalides in Perovskite Systems

Mechanism	Pseudohalide Example	Chemical Function	Observed Outcome in Perovskites
Defect Passivation	Trifluoroacetate (TFA⁻)	CO group coordinates with under-coordinated Pb²⁺ ions [27].	Reduction of Pb-related defects; Non-radiative recombination suppression [27].
Lattice Stabilization	Thiocyanate (SCN⁻)	Can bridge between perovskite layers, enhancing structural rigidity [28] [29].	Tightened lattice structure; Improved thermal stability [28] [30].
Halide Migration Inhibition	2-Methoxyethylamine Trifluoroacetate (MeOEA-TFA)	Electrostatic interaction between -NH₃⁺ and halide ions, reinforced by O-atom polarization, anchors halides [27].	Significant suppression of halogen migration; Improved operational stability [27].
Phase Distribution Regulation	Trifluoroacetate (TFA⁻)	CF group forms H-bonds with organic cations (e.g., PEA⁺/BA⁺), retarding their diffusion and delaying crystallization [27].	Increased proportion of desired n=2 phase in quasi-2D perovskites; Reduced n=1 phase [27].

Table 2: Quantitative Performance Enhancements from Pseudohalide Engineering

Performance Metric	Control System	Pseudohalide-Modified System	Pseudohalide Used	Reference
External Quantum Efficiency (EQE)	Reported as lower	7.41% (pure-blue PeLED)	MeOEA-TFA [27]	[27]
Luminance (cd m⁻²)	Reported as lower	3123 cd m⁻² (pure-blue PeLED)	MeOEA-TFA [27]	[27]
Operational Stability	Baseline	5-fold improvement (operational lifetime)	MeOEA-TFA [27]	[27]
Thermal Stability	Halide complexes less stable	Exceptional thermal stability surpassing halide counterparts	N₃⁻, NCS⁻ in Cu(I) complexes [30]	[30]
Emission Wavelength Tuning	A₂MnBr₄: 512 nm (green)	549–613 nm (green-red) in (RPh₃P)₂MnBrₓNCS₄₋ₓ	Thiocyanate (NCS⁻) [31]	[31]

Diagram 1: Mechanisms of pseudohalide engineering for improved perovskite performance, showing how molecular-level interactions lead to enhanced device properties.

Detailed Experimental Protocols

Protocol: Incorporating MeOEA-TFA in Quasi-2D Mixed Halide Perovskites

This protocol details the use of 2-Methoxyethylamine Trifluoroacetate (MeOEA-TFA) as a multi-functional additive to suppress halogen migration and passivate defects in quasi-2D mixed Br/Cl perovskite films for pure-blue PeLEDs [27].

• Objective: To synthesize a high-efficiency, stable pure-blue perovskite emission layer with suppressed ion migration and reduced defect density.

• Materials:

  • Precursor Salts: CsCl, PbBr₂, PEABr, BABr.
  • Solvent: Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).
  • Additive: 2-Methoxyethylamine Trifluoroacetate (MeOEA-TFA).
  • Substrate: Pre-annealed PEDOT:PSS layer on a flexible or rigid substrate.

• Procedure:

  • Precursor Solution Preparation: Dissolve CsCl, PbBr₂, PEABr, and BABr in DMSO at a molar ratio of 1.1:1:0.6:0.4 to create the base perovskite precursor solution.
  • Additive Introduction: Add a optimized molar percentage of MeOEA-TFA (e.g., 5-15 mol%) to the precursor solution. Vortex and stir until a clear, homogeneous solution is obtained.
  • Film Deposition: Spin-coat the final precursor solution onto the prepared PEDOT:PSS substrate. A typical two-step spin-coating program is recommended (e.g., 1000 rpm for 10 s, followed by 4000 rpm for 30 s).
  • Annealing: Immediately after deposition, transfer the film to a hotplate and anneal at 90-100 °C for 10-15 minutes to remove residual solvent and crystallize the perovskite film.

• Key Considerations:

  • The electrostatic interaction between the -NH₃⁺ group of MeOEA⁺ and halide ions is crucial for immobilizing halides. This is stronger than hydrogen bonding alone and is reinforced by the electron-withdrawing O atom in MeOEA⁺ [27].
  • The TFA⁻ anion simultaneously passivates Pb defects via coordination and regulates phase distribution by forming hydrogen bonds with organic cations.

Protocol: Synthesizing Pseudohalide-Substituted Layered Cobalt Hydroxides

This protocol describes the synthesis of α-cobalt-based layered hydroxides intercalated with pseudohalides (SCN⁻ or C₄N₃⁻) via an epoxide route, useful for exploring fundamental structural and magnetic properties [28] [29].

• Objective: To prepare two-dimensional pseudohalide-modified layered hydroxides and study their structural and magnetic properties.

• Materials:

  • Metal Salt: CoCl₂·6H₂O.
  • Pseudohalide Salts: NaSCN (for thiocyanate) or NaC₄N₃ (for tricyanomethanide).
  • Precipitation Agent: Glycidol.
  • Solvents: Deionized Water, Ethanol (EtOH).
  • Nucleophile (for C₄N₃⁻): NaCl.

• Procedure for α-Co-SCN:

  • In a mixture of H₂O and EtOH (1:1 v/v), dissolve NaSCN (100 mM), glycidol (500-1000 mM), and CoCl₂ (10 mM).
  • Allow the solution to precipitate at room temperature for 24 hours.
  • Collect the green solid by filtration, wash thoroughly with Milli-Q water and ethanol, and dry overnight in a desiccator with dry silica.

• Procedure for α-Co-C₄N₃:

  • In a mixture of H₂O and EtOH (3:1 v/v), dissolve NaC₄N₃ (100 mM), glycidol (1000 mM), CoCl₂ (10 mM), and NaCl (50 mM). The added NaCl acts as a nucleophile to promote precipitation.
  • Allow the solution to precipitate at room temperature for 48 hours.
  • Collect the solid by filtration, wash multiple times with water and ethanol, and dry in a desiccator.

• Characterization:

  • Structural: Use Powder X-ray Diffraction (PXRD) to confirm the layered structure and measure interlayer spacing changes.
  • Spectroscopic: Employ Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier-Transform Infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy to confirm pseudohalide incorporation and its coordination mode (e.g., bridging for SCN⁻).
  • Magnetic: Perform DC magnetization measurements using a SQUID magnetometer from 2-300 K to study magnetic ordering behavior.

Diagram 2: Experimental workflows for pseudohalide incorporation in perovskite films and layered hydroxides.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Reagents for Pseudohalide Engineering Research

Reagent / Material	Function / Role	Example Application / Note
2-Methoxyethylamine Trifluoroacetate (MeOEA-TFA)	Multi-functional additive; cation (MeOEA⁺) inhibits halide migration via electrostatic interaction, anion (TFA⁻) passivates defects and regulates phase distribution [27].	Critical for achieving high EQE (>7%) in pure-blue quasi-2D PeLEDs; improves operational stability 5-fold [27].
Thiocyanate (SCN⁻) Salts (e.g., NaSCN)	Pseudohalide for structural modification; can induce bridging coordination between inorganic layers, tightening the lattice structure [28] [29].	Used in synthesizing α-cobalt layered hydroxides; induces subtle structural and magnetic modifications [28].
Tricyanomethanide (C₄N₃⁻) Salts (e.g., NaC₄N₃)	A less-explored pseudohalide for modulating the interlayer chemistry and electronic properties of layered materials [28] [29].	Incorporation into α-layered hydroxide frameworks requires addition of a nucleophile like NaCl to promote precipitation [29].
Cesium Trifluoroacetate (Cs-TFA)	Source of TFA⁻ anions for defect passivation without introducing additional organic cations.	Can be used to study the isolated effect of the TFA⁻ anion on perovskite film properties [27].
Glycidol	Proton-scavenging agent used in the epoxide synthesis route to precipitate layered hydroxide materials [28] [29].	Standard reagent for the synthesis of Simonkolleite-like α-layered hydroxides.

Pseudohalide engineering represents a powerful and versatile strategy for advancing PQD-based LED research. By employing the detailed protocols for material synthesis and device fabrication outlined in this document, researchers can directly implement these innovative approaches. The strategic use of pseudohalides like TFA⁻ and SCN⁻, which function through robust mechanisms such as electrostatic halide anchoring and metal-ion defect passivation, addresses the core challenges of defect suppression and halide migration. Integrating these surface modification techniques will be instrumental in developing the next generation of high-performance, spectrally stable, and commercially viable perovskite light-emitting devices.

Bilateral and Multi-Functional Ligand Designs for Comprehensive Surface Coverage

In the development of perovskite quantum dot (PQD)-based light-emitting diodes (PeLEDs), achieving comprehensive and stable surface coverage on nanocrystals is a fundamental challenge. The dynamic nature of ligands traditionally used in synthesis, such as oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OAm), leads to their detachment from the PQD surface, creating unpassivated defect sites that act as quenching centers and significantly impair device performance and stability [22] [21]. Bilateral and multi-functional ligand designs present a sophisticated strategy to overcome these limitations. These advanced ligands are engineered to feature multiple, strong binding sites that anchor securely to the PQD surface, while their functional molecular backbone enhances inter-ligand interactions and material compatibility. This approach ensures robust surface passivation, suppresses ion migration, and improves charge transport, thereby unlocking the full potential of PQDs in optoelectronic applications [32] [21].

Key Ligand Design Strategies and Mechanisms

Bidentate Ligands for Enhanced Binding Affinity

Bidentate ligands are designed to form two coordinate bonds with the perovskite surface, resulting in a dramatic increase in binding energy compared to conventional monodentate ligands. The significantly stronger attachment prevents ligand desorption during subsequent processing steps, ensuring that the surface remains passivated.

• Formamidine Thiocyanate (FASCN): This liquid bidentate ligand employs soft sulfur and nitrogen atoms to coordinate with lead atoms on the FAPbI3 QD surface. Density-functional theory (DFT) calculations reveal a binding energy of -0.91 eV, which is approximately fourfold higher than that of standard oleate ligands (OA: -0.22 eV; OAm: -0.18 eV) and about threefold higher than other common halide ligands like FAI (-0.31 eV) and MAI (-0.30 eV) [21]. This tight binding is crucial for achieving full surface coverage and effectively eliminating interfacial quenching sites.

Bilateral Ligand Combinations for Surface Energy Control

Strategically combining ligands with different chain architectures and binding groups allows for precise control over the surface energy of PQDs. This is particularly critical for mitigating detrimental effects in solution-processing techniques like inkjet printing.

• Octanoic Acid/Oleylamine (OcA/OAm) Combination: This specific mixed-ligand system creates a spatial barrier that optimizes the Ohnesorge number (Z), a key parameter governing ink jetting behavior. The branched nature of OcA and OAm results in a high surface energy (2.14 eV), which enhances steric stabilization, reduces particle aggregation, and promotes Marangoni flow during droplet drying. This effectively suppresses the "coffee ring effect," leading to the formation of high-fidelity, uniform patterns on flexible substrates [32].

Short-Chain and Multidentate Ligands for Improved Conductivity

Long-chain insulating ligands create barriers to charge transport between QDs. Engineering shorter ligands or those with multidentate binding motifs can significantly enhance the electrical conductivity of PQD films.

• FASCN as a Short Ligand: With a carbon chain length of less than three atoms, FASCN replaces the long-chain oleates. This change results in an eightfold higher film conductivity (3.95 × 10⁻⁷ S m⁻¹) compared to the control, facilitating efficient charge injection and transportation in LED devices [21].
• Multidentate Ligands: The use of ligands featuring multiple binding groups (e.g., X-type and L-type) can further strengthen the attachment to the PQD surface and improve passivation. These ligands are less prone to detachment and more effectively address surface defects, leading to enhanced luminescence performance and stability [22].

Table 1: Performance Comparison of Different Ligand Strategies in PQDs

Ligand System	Key Feature	Binding Energy (eV)	Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY)	Key Improvement
FASCN (Bidentate) [21]	Short-chain, liquid	-0.91	Highest improvement over control	~23% EQE in NIR-LEDs; Eightfold higher conductivity
OcA/OAm (Bilateral) [32]	Mixed acid/amine	N/P	92%	Suppressed coffee ring effect; High-fidelity printing
OA/OAm (Conventional) [22] [21]	Long-chain, dynamic	-0.22 (OA) / -0.18 (OAm)	Baseline	Baseline; Prone to detachment

Experimental Protocols

Protocol: Post-Synthesis Ligand Exchange with FASCN

This protocol describes the treatment of pre-synthesized FAPbI₃ QDs with the bidentate ligand FASCN to enhance surface coverage and optoelectronic properties [21].

• Research Reagent Solutions:

  • Precursor QDs: Oleate-capped FAPbI₃ QDs in non-polar solvent (e.g., toluene, hexane).
  • Ligand Solution: 10 mM Formamidine thiocyanate (FASCN) in dimethylformamide (DMF).
  • Purification Solvents: Anhydrous toluene, methyl acetate (or ethyl acetate).
  • Equipment: Centrifuge, vortex mixer, inert atmosphere glovebox (or nitrogen flow setup).

• Step-by-Step Procedure:

  • Concentrate Precursor QDs: Precipitate a known volume (e.g., 5 mL) of the pristine FAPbI₃ QD solution by adding a polar anti-solvent (e.g., methyl acetate) at a volume ratio of 1:2. Centrifuge at 8000 rpm for 5 minutes and discard the supernatant.
  • Redisperse and Mix: Redisperse the QD pellet in 2 mL of anhydrous toluene. Add this QD solution dropwise to 5 mL of the 10 mM FASCN ligand solution under vigorous vortexing.
  • Incubate for Exchange: Allow the mixture to stir for 10 minutes at room temperature to facilitate the complete exchange of oleate ligands with FASCN.
  • Purify Treated QDs: Add an excess of methyl acetate (approx. 15 mL) to the mixture to precipitate the FASCN-treated QDs. Centrifuge at 8000 rpm for 5 minutes.
  • Wash and Finalize: Carefully discard the supernatant. Redisperse the final pellet in a desired non-polar solvent (e.g., octane, octane) to form a stable ink for film deposition. Filter the ink through a 0.22 μm PTFE filter before use.

Protocol: In-Situ Synthesis of CsPbBr₃ QDs with Mixed Bilateral Ligands

This protocol outlines the hot-injection synthesis of CsPbBr₃ QDs using four different bilateral ligand combinations to control surface energy and mitigate the coffee ring effect in printing [32].

• Research Reagent Solutions:

  • Cesium Source: Cesium carbonate (Cs₂CO₃).
  • Lead Source: Lead bromide (PbBr₂).
  • Solvent: 1-Octadecene (ODE).
  • Ligand Pairs: Oleic acid (OA), Oleylamine (OAm), Octanoic acid (OcA), Octylamine (OcAm). Used in four combinations: OA/OAm, OA/OcAm, OcA/OAm, OcA/OcAm.
  • Equipment: Three-neck flask, Schlenk line, heating mantle, thermometer, syringe.

• Step-by-Step Procedure:

  • Prepare Cesium Oleate: Load 0.4 g Cs₂CO₃, 1.25 mL OA, and 15 mL ODE into a 50 mL flask. Dry and degas under vacuum at 120°C for 1 hour. Heat under N₂ to 150°C until the Cs₂CO₃ is fully dissolved.
  • Prepare Lead Halide Precursor: In a separate 100 mL three-neck flask, load 0.069 g PbBr₂, 5 mL ODE, and the selected ligand pair (e.g., 0.5 mL OcA and 0.5 mL OAm). Dry and degas under vacuum at 120°C for 30 minutes until the solution becomes clear.
  • Hot Injection: Under a nitrogen atmosphere, rapidly raise the temperature of the lead precursor solution to 180°C. Swiftly inject 0.4 mL of the preheated cesium oleate solution into the reaction flask.
  • Crystallization and Quenching: Allow the reaction to proceed for 5-10 seconds to facilitate QD growth. Immediately cool the reaction flask using an ice-water bath to quench the reaction.
  • Purification: Centrifuge the crude solution at high speed (e.g., 10,000 rpm) for 10 minutes. Isolate the precipitate and redisperse it in an anhydrous non-polar solvent (e.g., hexane, toluene). Repeat the centrifugation and redispersion cycle twice to obtain purified QDs.

Table 2: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Bilateral Ligand Synthesis

Reagent Category	Specific Examples	Function in Synthesis/Processing
Precursors	Cs₂CO₃, PbBr₂, FAPbI₃ QDs	Provides metal and halide ions for the perovskite crystal structure [32] [21].
Solvents	1-Octadecene (ODE), Toluene, Dimethylformamide (DMF)	ODE: High-booint solvent for hot-injection; Toluene/DMF: Dispersion and ligand exchange media [32] [21].
Ligands (Acids)	Oleic Acid (OA), Octanoic Acid (OcA)	X-type ligands; Bind to undercoordinated Pb²⁺ sites on the PQD surface [32] [22].
Ligands (Amines)	Oleylamine (OAm), Octylamine (OcAm)	L-type ligands; Interact with halide ions on the PQD surface via hydrogen bonding [32] [22].
Advanced Ligands	Formamidine Thiocyanate (FASCN)	Bidentate ligand; Provides high-binding-energy passivation for full surface coverage [21].

Characterization and Validation

Rigorous characterization is essential to validate the efficacy of bilateral and multi-functional ligand designs.

• Photophysical Properties: A successful ligand exchange, such as with FASCN, should result in a substantial increase in Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY) and a prolonged photoluminescence lifetime, as measured by Time-Resolved Photoluminescence (TRPL). These improvements indicate a reduction in non-radiative recombination pathways due to effective surface passivation [21].
• Binding Affinity Analysis: Density-functional theory (DFT) calculations are used to compute and compare the binding energies of different ligands to the PQD surface, providing a theoretical basis for the observed stability [32] [21].
• Surface Chemistry and Stability: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) can detect shifts in the binding energy of core ions (e.g., Pb 4f, I 3d), confirming the passivation of surface vacancies (e.g., Iodine vacancies) by the new ligands [21]. Furthermore, films treated with robust ligands like FASCN should demonstrate superior thermal and humidity stability, showing minimal photoluminescence quenching or spectral shifts under stress tests [21].
• Morphological and Optoelectronic Assessment: For bilateral ligands like OcA/OAm, a key validation is the elimination of the "coffee ring effect" in printed patterns, resulting in uniform films with low surface roughness [32]. Enhanced film conductivity, verified by two-terminal device measurements, confirms the benefit of short-chain ligands for charge transport [21].

Acid Etching-Driven Ligand Exchange for Ultralow Trap Densities

The performance of perovskite quantum dot-based light-emitting diodes (PQD-LEDs) is predominantly governed by the density of trap states on the PQD surface. These trap states, often originating from ligand desorption and surface ion vacancies, serve as non-radiative recombination centers that quench photoluminescence and limit device efficiency [33] [34]. Surface modification through ligand engineering has emerged as a pivotal strategy to suppress these trap states. Among various approaches, acid etching-driven ligand exchange has proven particularly effective in achieving ultralow trap densities, thereby significantly enhancing the optoelectronic properties of PQDs and the performance of resulting LEDs [14]. This protocol details a methodology for implementing acid etching-driven ligand exchange to create high-performance PQD-LEDs with exceptional color purity and operational stability, contributing to the broader thesis research on surface modification strategies for PQD optoelectronics.

Experimental Protocols

Synthesis of Oleate-Capped CsPbBr₃ PQDs

Principle: The hot-injection method provides high-quality, monodisperse PQDs with precise size control and excellent crystallinity, which is crucial for reproducible ligand exchange and device performance [34] [35].

Materials:

• Cesium carbonate (Cs₂CO₃, 99.9%)
• Lead bromide (PbBr₂, 99.99%)
• 1-Octadecene (ODE, 90%)
• Oleic acid (OA, 90%)
• Oleylamine (OAm, 80-90%)
• Zinc bromide (ZnBr₂, 99.99%)
• Toluene (anhydrous, 99.8%)
• Methyl acetate (MeOAc, anhydrous, 99.5%)

Procedure:

• Cs-oleate precursor: Load Cs₂CO₃ (0.407 g), OA (1.25 mL), and ODE (25 mL) into a 100 mL three-neck flask. Heat to 120°C under vacuum for 30 min until complete dissolution. Switch to N₂ atmosphere and heat to 135°C until use [35].
• Pb-oleate precursor: In a separate flask, mix OA and OAm in a 1:1 (v/v) ratio. Degas at 120°C for 30 min under vacuum. In another flask, dissolve PbBr₂ (1.2 mmol) and ZnBr₂ (appropriate doping concentration) in ODE (25 mL). Degas at 120°C for 30 min, then purge with N₂ [35].
• PQD synthesis: Add preheated oleate mixture (7.5 mL) to the Pb-oleate solution. Heat to 170°C. Rapidly inject Cs-oleate precursor (3 mL) and maintain for 10 seconds. Immediately cool the reaction in an ice-water bath to terminate growth [35].
• Purification: Precipitate PQDs by adding MeOAc to the crude solution. Centrifuge at 12,000 rpm for 30 min. Discard supernatant and redisperse precipitate in hexane. Repeat centrifugation and redispersion twice. Store purified PQDs in hexane (10 mg/mL) at 4°C for 24 h before use [35].

Acid Etching-Driven Ligand Exchange

Principle: Controlled acid etching removes native oleate ligands while simultaneously creating halide-rich surfaces that facilitate binding of more stable, shorter-chain ligands, dramatically reducing surface defects and non-radiative recombination [14].

Materials:

• Purified oleate-capped CsPbBr₃ PQDs in hexane (10 mg/mL)
• (3-mercaptopropyl)trimethoxysilane (MPTMS, 95%)
• Methylammonium bromide (MABr, 99.5%)
• Toluene (anhydrous, 99.8%)
• Hydrobromic acid (HBr, 48% in water, analytical grade)
• Ethanol (anhydrous, 99.9%)

Procedure:

• Acid etching solution preparation: Prepare a 0.1% (v/v) HBr solution in anhydrous toluene under nitrogen atmosphere [14].
• Ligand exchange reaction:
  • Transfer oleate-PQDs solution (10 mL at 10 mg/mL) to a nitrogen-purged reaction vessel.
  • Add MPTMS (20 μL) and MABr (0.1 g) to the PQD solution [35].
  • Slowly add the acid etching solution (0.5 mL) dropwise under vigorous stirring.
  • Continue stirring for 60 min at room temperature under N₂ atmosphere.
• Purification: Precipitate ligand-exchanged PQDs by adding excess methyl acetate. Centrifuge at 12,000 rpm for 30 min. Discard supernatant and redisperse in toluene. Repeat purification twice to remove all reaction byproducts and unbound ligands [35].

Table 1: Key Parameters for Acid Etching-Driven Ligand Exchange

Parameter	Optimal Range	Effect of Deviation
HBr Concentration	0.05-0.2% (v/v)	Lower: Incomplete ligand exchange; Higher: PQD degradation
Reaction Time	45-75 minutes	Shorter: Partial exchange; Longer: Reduced PLQY
MPTMS:PQD Ratio	1:10 (w/w)	Lower: Insufficient passivation; Higher: Ligand aggregation
Reaction Temperature	20-25°C	Higher: Accelerated etching, poor control

Fabrication of PQD-LEDs

Principle: The ligand-exchanged PQDs are integrated into a device architecture that facilitates balanced charge injection while protecting the PQDs from environmental degradation [36] [14].

Materials:

• Indium tin oxide (ITO) substrates (15 Ω/sq)
• PEDOT:PSS (Clevios AI 4083)
• Poly-TPD (MW: 50,000-100,000)
• PQD solution in toluene (20 mg/mL)
• TPBi (99.5%)
• LiF (99.98%)
• Aluminum wire (99.999%)

Procedure:

• Substrate preparation: Pattern ITO substrates by photolithography and etching. Clean sequentially with detergent, deionized water, acetone, and isopropanol under sonication. Treat with UV-ozone for 15 min [36].
• Hole injection layer: Spin-coat PEDOT:PSS at 4000 rpm for 30 s. Anneal at 150°C for 15 min in air. Transfer to N₂ glovebox [36].
• Hole transport layer: Spin-coat poly-TPD solution in chlorobenzene (8 mg/mL) at 3000 rpm for 30 s. Anneal at 120°C for 30 min [36].
• PQD emissive layer: Spin-coat ligand-exchanged PQD solution (20 mg/mL in toluene) at 2000 rpm for 30 s. Use a single coating step without annealing to prevent ligand desorption [14].
• Electron transport layer and electrodes: Thermally evaporate TPBi (40 nm), LiF (1 nm), and aluminum (100 nm) sequentially under high vacuum (<5×10⁻⁶ Torr) [36].
• Encapsulation: Transfer devices to a N₂ glovebox (<0.1 ppm O₂ and H₂O) for glass lid encapsulation using UV-curable epoxy resin [37].

Results and Characterization

Optical and Structural Properties

Comprehensive characterization confirms the effectiveness of acid etching-driven ligand exchange in producing PQDs with superior optoelectronic properties suitable for high-performance LEDs.

Table 2: Performance Comparison of PQD-LEDs Before and After Acid Etching-Driven Ligand Exchange

Parameter	Oleate-Capped PQD-LEDs	Acid Etched PQD-LEDs	Measurement Conditions
Trap Density (cm⁻³)	~10¹⁶	~10¹⁰	Space-charge-limited current
PLQY (%)	45-60	80-92	Integrated sphere, 450 nm excitation
FWHM (nm)	22-25	18-20	PL spectroscopy
EQE (%)	3-5	12-26	At luminance 100 cd/m²
Operational Lifetime (T₅₀)	<10 h	>350 h	Initial luminance 1000 cd/m²
Maximum Brightness (cd/m²)	~50,000	~312,000	At driving voltage 8V

Photophysical Characterization:

• UV-Vis and PL spectroscopy: Measure absorption and emission spectra using a spectrophotometer. Acid-etched PQDs typically show a slight blue shift (<5 nm) due to surface reconstruction and minimal size reduction [14].
• Time-resolved PL: Use a time-correlated single photon counting system with 375 nm excitation. Acid-etched PQDs exhibit longer average lifetime (>50 ns) indicating reduced non-radiative decay channels [36].
• PLQY measurement: Employ an integrating sphere with 450 nm excitation. Record values >80% for optimized samples, indicating effective trap passivation [36] [37].

Structural and Morphological Characterization:

• Transmission electron microscopy (TEM): Prepare samples by dropping diluted PQD solution onto carbon-coated copper grids. Acid-etched PQDs maintain crystalline structure with minimal etching damage and improved monodispersity [35].
• X-ray diffraction (XRD): Use Cu Kα radiation (λ=1.5406 Å). Patterns show maintained cubic perovskite structure with sharpened peaks indicating improved crystallinity [36].
• Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR): Confirm ligand exchange by observing decreased oleate C=O stretching (1710 cm⁻¹) and emergence of siloxane Si-O-Si stretching (1000-1100 cm⁻¹) [35].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Acid Etching-Driven Ligand Exchange

Reagent	Function	Critical Notes
Hydrobromic Acid (HBr)	Etching agent for native ligand removal	Concentration must be carefully controlled (0.05-0.2%) to prevent perovskite core damage
(3-mercaptopropyl)trimethoxysilane (MPTMS)	Bifunctional ligand for surface passivation	Thiol group binds to Pb sites; methoxysilane enables subsequent cross-linking
Methylammonium Bromide (MABr)	Halide source for surface defect healing	Compensates bromide vacancies created during acid etching process
Lead Bromide (PbBr₂)	Perovskite precursor	Excess Pb²⁺ during synthesis creates a halide-deficient surface prone to etching
Zinc Bromide (ZnBr₂)	Additive for crystallization control	Incorporation during synthesis improves crystal quality and etching uniformity
Oleic Acid/Oleylamine	Native capping ligands	Must be thoroughly removed during purification to prevent recombination

Visualized Workflows

Acid Etching-Driven Ligand Exchange Mechanism

Experimental Workflow for PQD-LED Fabrication

Applications in PQD-LED Research

The acid etching-driven ligand exchange protocol enables PQD-LEDs with exceptional performance metrics critical for next-generation displays. Devices fabricated using this method achieve high power conversion efficiencies (15.6% at 300 mA cm⁻²) and remarkable operational stability (350 h half-lifetime at 1000 cd m⁻²) [36]. These characteristics address the fundamental challenges in perovskite optoelectronics, balancing efficiency with device longevity. The protocol is particularly valuable for achieving spectrally stable pure-blue and pure-red emission, where trap states have traditionally limited performance [14]. Furthermore, the passivated PQDs exhibit low amplified spontaneous emission thresholds (13 μJ cm⁻²), highlighting their potential for future electrically pumped perovskite lasers [36]. Integration of these PQDs in micro-LED architectures demonstrates compatibility with flexible displays, maintaining performance at bending radii of 5 mm [35].

The acid etching-driven ligand exchange protocol represents a significant advancement in surface modification strategies for PQD-LEDs. By systematically replacing weakly-bound native ligands with stable silane-based alternatives while healing surface defects, this approach achieves ultralow trap densities (~10¹⁰ cm⁻³) that were previously challenging to obtain. The comprehensive methodology outlined herein—from optimized synthesis conditions through detailed characterization—provides researchers with a reproducible framework for fabricating high-performance PQD-LEDs. As research progresses, further refinement of etching parameters and ligand systems will continue to enhance device performance, pushing toward the theoretical limits of perovskite-based optoelectronics and enabling new applications in displays, lighting, and quantum technologies.

• Nature Communications 16, 2367 (2025) - Ultralow trap density FAPbBr3 perovskite films
• Journal of Luminescence 277, 120906 (2025) - Luminescent perovskite quantum dots
• Journal of Alloys and Compounds (2024) - Double surface modulation strategy
• PMC (2020) - Micro-light-emitting diodes with quantum dots
• Nanomaterials 10(7), 1327 (2020) - Advances in Quantum-Dot-Based Displays
• Scinapse Review (2024) - Advances in Perovskite Quantum Dot Optoelectronics
• Accounts of Chemical Research (2020) - Mechanisms of Thermal Atomic Layer Etching
• Scientific Reports (2023) - Full-color micro-LED display with photo-patternable PQDs
• Next Energy 4, 100152 (2024) - Perovskite quantum dots: What's next?
• ScienceDirect - Ligand Exchange Reaction overview

Surface passivation is a critical determinant of performance and stability in perovskite quantum dot (PQD)-based light-emitting diodes (PeLEDs). The inherent ionic nature of perovskite materials makes them susceptible to defect formation, which accelerates non-radiative recombination and degrades device efficiency. This document provides a structured analysis of both in-situ and post-synthesis passivation protocols, offering application notes and detailed experimental methodologies to guide research in surface modification for PeLEDs.

The following table summarizes key performance metrics achieved through various passivation strategies, providing a comparative overview of their effectiveness.

Table 1: Quantitative performance outcomes of different passivation strategies for PQDs.

Passivation Strategy	Material System	Key Performance Improvement	Reference
Ligand Passivation (TOP)	CsPbI₃ PQDs	PLQY increase of 16%	[5]
Ligand Passivation (TOPO)	CsPbI₃ PQDs	PLQY increase of 18%	[5]
Ligand Passivation (L-PHE)	CsPbI₃ PQDs	>70% initial PL intensity retained after 20 days UV exposure	[5]
Zwitterionic Ligand	CsPbBr₃ NCs	Enhanced colloidal stability in dichloromethane; enabled blue-emitting NCs	[38]
In-Situ Iodide Passivation (HI)	CsPbI₃ QDs	Solar cell PCE increased from 14.07% to 15.72%; reduced defect density	[39]
AET Post-Treatment	CsPbI₃ QDs	PLQY improved from 22% to 51%; >95% initial PL after 60 min water exposure	[40]

Experimental Protocols for Passivation

In-Situ Passivation Protocol: Zwitterionic Ligand Formation for CsPbBr₃ NCs

This protocol describes the in-situ formation of a zwitterionic ligand during synthesis to enhance the colloidal and optical stability of CsPbBr₃ nanocrystals (NCs) [38].

• Primary Reagents: Lead(II) bromide (PbBr₂, 99%), 8-bromooctanoic acid (BOA, 98%), oleylamine (OAm, tech. grade 90%), 1-octadecene (ODE, tech. grade 90%), cesium carbonate (Cs₂CO₃, 99.9%).
• Procedure:
  • Precursor Preparation: In a 250 mL three-neck flask, combine PbBr₂ (1 mmol) and ODE (50 mL). Evacuate the flask and heat to 90°C under vacuum for 1 hour.
  • Ligand and Halide Source Addition: Under a nitrogen atmosphere, inject OAm (5 mL) and BOA (1 mmol) into the flask. The BOA acts as both an additional bromide source and a ligand precursor.
  • Incubation for Zwitterion Formation: Maintain the reaction mixture at 90°C for 30 minutes. During this incubation, an SN2 reaction between OAm and BOA occurs, generating bromide ions and forming the zwitterionic ligand in situ.
  • Cesium Injection: Rapidly inject a preheated Cs-oleate solution (0.4 mmol in 8 mL ODE) at 165°C. The reaction proceeds for 5–10 seconds.
  • Purification and Washing: Cool the reaction mixture immediately in an ice-water bath. Centrifuge the crude solution and discard the supernatant. Wash the precipitated NCs twice with hexane to remove weakly bound contaminants and unreacted species. The final NCs are insoluble in hexane but form stable colloids in dichloromethane (DCM). [38]
• Key Notes: The zwitterionic ligand passivates the NC surface through a bidentate binding mode (COO⁻ + NH₃⁺), which is significantly more stable than monodentate binding, as confirmed by DFT calculations. This robust passivation is responsible for the unique solubility characteristics and enhanced stability. [38]

In-Situ Passivation Protocol: HI Addition for CsPbI₃ QDs

This protocol utilizes hydroiodic acid (HI) as an in-situ passivant to optimize nucleation, reduce defect density, and improve the phase purity of CsPbI₃ QDs for photovoltaic applications. [39]

• Primary Reagents: Lead iodide (PbI₂, 99.0%), hydroiodic acid (HI, 95%), oleic acid (OA, tech. grade 90%), oleylamine (OLA, tech. grade 90%), 1-octadecene (ODE, tech. grade 90%), Cs₂CO₃ (99.9%). [39]
• Procedure:
  • Pb-precursor Solution: Combine PbI₂ (1 g) and ODE (50 mL) in a 250 mL three-neck flask. Dry and degas by heating at 90°C under vacuum for 1 hour.
  • HI Introduction: Under N₂ atmosphere, add OA (5 mL), OLA (5 mL), and the desired volume of HI solution (e.g., 50–150 μL) to the flask. The HI converts uncoordinated PbI₂ into highly coordinated [PbIm]²⁻m species, controlling nucleation kinetics.
  • Reaction Initiation: Heat the mixture to 165°C. Swiftly inject preheated Cs-oleate solution (8 mL) and let the reaction proceed for 5 seconds.
  • Purification: Cool the mixture rapidly in an ice-water bath. Precipitate the QDs by adding methyl acetate (MeOAc) at a 3:1 volume ratio to the crude solution, followed by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 5 minutes. Redisperse the pellet in hexane and repeat the MeOAc washing step. [39]
• Key Notes: The addition of HI provides an external iodide source, reducing the stoichiometric excess of PbI₂ required and minimizing lead-related byproducts. This results in QDs with enhanced crystallinity, reduced trap state density, and improved performance in solar cells. [39]

Post-Synthesis Passivation Protocol: AET Ligand Exchange for CsPbI₃ QDs

This protocol outlines a post-treatment ligand exchange strategy using 2-aminoethanethiol (AET) to heal surface defects generated during the purification of CsPbI₃ QDs. [40]

• Primary Reagents: Pre-synthesized and purified CsPbI₃ QDs, 2-aminoethanethiol (AET, >95%), anhydrous hexane, methyl acetate (MeOAc, 99.5%). [40]
• Procedure:
  • QD Preparation: Synthesize CsPbI₃ QDs via standard hot-injection methods and purify using MeOAc to remove excess ligands. [40]
  • AET Solution Preparation: Prepare a 10 mM solution of AET in anhydrous hexane.
  • Ligand Exchange: Redisperse the purified QD pellet in the AET/hexane solution. Stir the mixture gently for 2 hours at room temperature to allow the thiolate groups of AET to strongly coordinate with undercoordinated Pb²⁺ ions on the QD surface.
  • Purification: Precipitate the AET-passivated QDs by adding MeOAc and centrifuging at 8000 rpm for 5 minutes. Discard the supernatant and redisperse the QDs in an appropriate solvent for film formation or device fabrication.
• Key Notes: The thiol group in AET has a stronger affinity for Pb²⁺ sites compared to native oleic acid/oleylamine ligands, leading to a denser and more robust passivation layer. This effectively suppresses non-radiative recombination and protects the QDs from moisture and UV degradation, maintaining over 95% of the initial PL intensity after 60 minutes of water exposure. [40]

Workflow and Mechanism Visualization

The following diagram illustrates the logical sequence of a combined in-situ and post-synthesis surface modification workflow for PQDs, highlighting the key stages from synthesis to stabilized dots.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

The table below catalogs key reagents used in the featured passivation protocols, along with their specific functions in the context of PQD synthesis and stabilization.

Table 2: Key reagents and their functions in PQD passivation protocols.

Reagent	Function/Role in Passivation	Example Protocol
Trioctylphosphine Oxide (TOPO)	Lewis base ligand; coordinates with undercoordinated Pb²⁺ ions to suppress non-radiative recombination.	Ligand Passivation [5]
l-Phenylalanine (L-PHE)	Bidentate ligand; enhances photostability through strong surface binding.	Ligand Passivation [5]
8-Bromooctanoic Acid (BOA)	Precursor for in-situ zwitterionic ligand formation; provides halide ions and carboxylate functionality.	Zwitterionic Ligand [38]
Oleylamine (OAm)	Surfactant and reactant; participates in SN2 reaction with BOA to form the zwitterionic ligand.	Zwitterionic Ligand [38]
Hydroiodic Acid (HI)	In-situ iodide source; converts PbI₂ into [PbIm]²⁻m, optimizing nucleation and reducing iodine vacancies.	HI Addition [39]
2-Aminoethanethiol (AET)	Post-synthesis passivant; strong Pb²⁺ coordination via thiol group heals surface defects.	AET Ligand Exchange [40]
Methyl Acetate (MeOAc)	Polar solvent for purification; precipitates QDs to remove excess ligands and byproducts.	Multiple Protocols [5] [39]

Integrating Surface-Modified PQDs into n-i-p and p-i-n LED Device Architectures

The integration of perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) into light-emitting diodes (LEDs) represents a frontier in optoelectronics, combining the exceptional luminescent properties of perovskites with the potential for flexible, high-efficiency devices. The performance and stability of these PQD-LEDs are profoundly influenced by both the surface chemistry of the PQDs and the architecture of the device [5] [8]. This document, framed within a broader thesis on surface modification for PQD-based LEDs, provides detailed application notes and experimental protocols for incorporating surface-modified CsPbI₃ PQDs into the two primary device configurations: n-i-p and p-i-n structures. Surface ligand engineering is critical for passivating defects and enhancing optoelectronic properties, while the choice of device architecture (n-i-p or p-i-n) dictates charge injection dynamics and overall device performance [5] [41]. The following sections outline the fundamental properties of PQDs, detailed synthesis protocols, device fabrication procedures, and a comparative analysis to guide researchers in optimizing PQD-LEDs.

Properties of Surface-Modified Perovskite Quantum Dots

Colloidal quantum dots (CQDs), including PQDs, exhibit unique electronic and optical properties due to quantum confinement, where the bandgap increases as the particle size decreases [42]. This allows for precise tuning of the emission wavelength. For CsPbI₃ PQDs, a bandgap of approximately 1.73 eV enables red emission, making them suitable for displays and lighting applications [5].

A critical challenge for CsPbI₃ PQDs is their inherent instability under environmental stressors such as humidity, oxygen, and prolonged illumination [5]. Surface ligand modification directly addresses this by passivating undercoordinated surface atoms (e.g., Pb²⁺ ions) and reducing surface defects that act as non-radiative recombination centers [5]. Effective passivation leads to:

• Enhanced Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY): The efficiency with which the PQDs convert absorbed light into emitted light.
• Narrower Emission Linewidths: Improved color purity.
• Superior Environmental and Photostability: Retaining over 70% of initial PL intensity after 20 days of continuous UV exposure has been demonstrated with specific ligands [5].

Table 1: Impact of Different Ligands on CsPbI₃ PQD Properties

Ligand	Chemical Function	Reported PL Enhancement	Key Stability Outcome
Trioctylphosphine Oxide (TOPO)	Coordinates with undercoordinated Pb²⁺ ions	18%	Effective passivation of surface defects [5]
Trioctylphosphine (TOP)	Coordinates with undercoordinated Pb²⁺ ions	16%	Effective passivation of surface defects [5]
L-Phenylalanine (L-PHE)	Coordinates with undercoordinated Pb²⁺ ions	3%	Superior photostability (>70% PL retention after 20 days UV) [5]

Beyond the PQD layer itself, interface engineering within the LED stack is crucial. The incorporation of dielectric or ferroelectric polymers, such as P(VDF-TrFE), at the perovskite/transport layer interfaces has been shown to modify energy level alignment, reduce trapping processes, and decrease saturation dark current, leading to significant improvements in device performance and stability [41].

Experimental Protocols

Synthesis and Surface Modification of CsPbI₃ PQDs

Principle: This protocol describes the hot-injection synthesis of red-emitting CsPbI₃ PQDs, followed by post-synthetic surface ligand exchange to optimize optical properties and stability [5].

Materials:

• Cesium carbonate (Cs₂CO₃, 99%)
• Lead(II) iodide (PbI₂, 99%)
• 1-Octadecene (ODE, 90%)
• Oleic acid (OA, 90%)
• Oleylamine (OAm, 70%)
• Ligand modifiers: Trioctylphosphine (TOP, 99%), Trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO, 99%), L-Phenylalanine (L-PHE, 98%)
• Solvents: Toluene, Hexane, Acetone

Equipment:

• Three-neck round-bottom flask
• Schlenk line or nitrogen inlet
• Heating mantle with temperature control
• Syringes and needles
• Centrifuge

Procedure:

• Cs-oleate Precursor Preparation: Load 0.2 g of Cs₂CO₃, 0.625 mL of OA, and 7.5 mL of ODE into a three-neck flask. Heat to 120°C under N₂ atmosphere with stirring until the Cs₂CO₃ is completely dissolved. Maintain at 120°C for use.
• Pb-I Precursor Reaction Mixture: In a separate three-neck flask, load 0.138 g of PbI₂, 10 mL of ODE, 1 mL of OA, and 1 mL of OAm. Heat the mixture to 170°C under N₂ with continuous stirring until a clear solution is obtained.
• Hot-Injection and Nucleation: Once the Pb-I mixture is stable at the optimal reaction temperature of 170°C, swiftly inject 1.5 mL of the preheated Cs-oleate precursor. Observe an immediate color change, indicating PQD nucleation.
• Reaction Quenching: Precisely 10 seconds after injection, immerse the reaction flask in an ice-water bath to rapidly terminate the reaction and control PQD growth.
• Purification: Transfer the crude solution to centrifuge tubes. Add acetone as an anti-solvent and centrifuge at 8000 rpm for 5 minutes. Discard the supernatant and re-disperse the PQD pellet in toluene. Repeat this washing cycle twice.
• Ligand Exchange: To implement ligand modification, re-disperse the purified PQD pellet in a toluene solution containing the desired ligand (TOP, TOPO, or L-PHE) at a concentration of 0.1 M. Stir for 2 hours to allow for ligand binding. Purify the ligand-modified PQDs again via centrifugation and re-disperse in anhydrous toluene for storage and film fabrication.

Diagram 1: PQD Synthesis and Ligand Modification Workflow. This flowchart outlines the key steps from precursor preparation to the final PQD ink, highlighting the critical hot-injection and ligand exchange stages.

Device Fabrication: n-i-p and p-i-n Architectures

Principle: This protocol details the fabrication of PQD-LEDs using both n-i-p (regular) and p-i-n (inverted) architectures. The choice of architecture affects charge injection, compatibility with electrodes, and overall device efficiency [8] [41].

Materials:

• Substrates: Pre-patterned ITO-coated glass or flexible PET.
• Charge Transport Layers:
  • n-i-p: PEDOT:PSS (hole-injection), Poly-TPD (hole-transport), TPBi (electron-transport).
  • p-i-n: NiOₓ (hole-transport), ZnO or SnO₂ (electron-transport).
• Electrodes: Evaporated Au or Ag for n-i-p; evaporated Al or LiF/Al for p-i-n. Alternative flexible electrodes include AgNW/PEDOT:PSS composites or graphene [8].
• Polymer Dielectric: P(VDF-TrFE) for interface engineering [41].

Equipment:

• Spin coater
• Thermal evaporator
• Glove box (N₂ atmosphere)
• Oxygen plasma cleaner

Procedure for n-i-p Architecture:

• Substrate Preparation: Clean the ITO substrate with solvents and treat with oxygen plasma for 15 minutes.
• Hole-Injection Layer (HIL): Spin-coat PEDOT:PSS onto the ITO at 4000 rpm for 30 s. Anneal at 150°C for 20 minutes in air. This forms the bottom hole-injecting contact.
• Hole-Transport Layer (HTL): Spin-coat a poly-TPD solution in chlorobenzene onto the PEDOT:PSS layer at 3000 rpm for 30 s. Anneal at 120°C for 30 minutes inside the glovebox.
• PQD Emissive Layer: Spin-coat the synthesized CsPbI₃ PQD ink (e.g., modified with TOPO) onto the HTL at 2000 rpm for 30 s. Use a low-temperature anneal (70°C for 5-10 minutes) to remove residual solvent without damaging the ligands.
• Electron-Transport Layer (ETL): Thermally evaporate a layer of TPBi (~40 nm) onto the PQD layer.
• Top Electrode Deposition: Thermally evaporate a LiF/Al (~1 nm/100 nm) bilayer as the top electron-injecting cathode.

Procedure for p-i-n Architecture:

• Substrate Preparation: Clean the ITO substrate as above.
• Electron-Transport Layer (ETL): Spin-coat a ZnO nanoparticle solution onto the ITO at 3000 rpm for 30 s. Anneal at 150°C for 30 minutes. This forms the bottom electron-injecting contact.
• Interface Engineering (Optional): To enhance performance, a thin layer of P(VDF-TrFE) can be introduced at the ETL/PQD interface via spin-coating [41].
• PQD Emissive Layer: Spin-coat the ligand-modified CsPbI₃ PQD ink onto the ETL (or polymer interface) using the same parameters as for the n-i-p structure.
• Hole-Transport Layer (HTL): Spin-coat a NiOₓ nanoparticle solution or a suitable organic HTL onto the PQD layer. Anneal as required.
• Top Electrode Deposition: Thermally evaporate a MoOₓ/Au (~10 nm/80 nm) bilayer as the top hole-injecting anode.

Diagram 2: n-i-p vs. p-i-n PQD-LED Architecture. The n-i-p structure uses a bottom anode, while the p-i-n structure uses a bottom cathode. The placement of the surface-modified PQD layer and optional interface layers differs between the two.

Results and Data Analysis

The performance of PQD-LEDs is quantified by key metrics such as External Quantum Efficiency (EQE), luminance, and operational stability. Surface modification and device architecture play interdependent roles in determining these outcomes.

Table 2: Comparative Performance of PQD-LEDs based on Architecture and Modification

Device Parameter	n-i-p Architecture	p-i-n Architecture	Impact of Surface/Interface Engineering
External Quantum Efficiency (EQE)	Can exceed 30% for green/red [8]	Highly efficient, >20% for red [8]	Increased by suppressing non-radiative recombination [5]
Luminance (cd/m²)	>1,000,000 for green [8]	High values reported	Contributes to overall emission intensity
Current Efficiency (cd/A)	~16.1 with graphene anode [8]	Comparable high values	Improved charge balance enhances efficiency
Dark Current & Detectivity	Relevant for photodetectors	Specific detectivity increased to ~10¹² Jones with P(VDF-TrFE) [41]	Interface engineering drastically reduces noise [41]
Response Speed	-	Rise/fall times improved to 4.6/6.5 µs with P(VDF-TrFE) [41]	Reduced trap density accelerates carrier dynamics [41]
Flexibility Performance	Maintains >81% current after 1200 bends [8]	Suitable for flexible substrates	Ligand passivation and flexible electrodes are critical [8]

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Materials for PQD Synthesis and LED Fabrication

Reagent / Material	Function / Application	Examples / Notes
Cs₂CO₃, PbI₂	Precursors for CsPbI₃ PQD synthesis	High purity (≥99%) is critical for high PLQY [5]
TOP, TOPO, L-PHE	Surface Ligands for Passivation	Suppress non-radiative recombination; enhance stability [5]
P(VDF-TrFE)	Polymer Dielectric for Interface Engineering	Modifies energy level alignment at interfaces in p-i-n devices; reduces dark current [41]
PEDOT:PSS	Hole-Injection Layer (HIL)	Standard for n-i-p architecture on ITO [8]
ZnO Nanoparticles	Electron-Transport Layer (ETL)	Standard for p-i-n architecture [8] [41]
AgNWs, Graphene	Flexible Transparent Electrodes	Replace ITO for flexible devices; offer high conductivity and bendability [8]
TPBi	Electron-Transport Layer (ETL)	Vacuum-deposited organic layer used in n-i-p devices [8]

Overcoming Stability and Performance Hurdles in PQD-LEDs Through Targeted Surface Manipulation

Metal halide perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) have emerged as a transformative class of materials for light-emitting applications, exhibiting exceptional optoelectronic properties including narrow emission bandwidth, high color purity, wide color tunability, and high photoluminescence quantum yields (PLQY) [43] [44]. Despite rapid advancements in device performance, with external quantum efficiencies (EQEs) of red and green perovskite light-emitting diodes (PeLEDs) now exceeding 20-30% in laboratory settings, their commercial viability remains severely constrained by environmental degradation issues [45] [46] [47]. PQDs exhibit particular susceptibility to moisture, oxygen, and light-induced degradation, leading to rapid deterioration of both operational performance and structural integrity [46] [48].

The ionic nature of perovskite crystals creates inherent instability under environmental stressors. Moisture penetration initiates lattice dissolution through hydration processes, while oxygen molecules can directly oxidize the perovskite structure, creating trap states that quench luminescence and reduce efficiency [48]. Photo-degradation further accelerates these processes through photochemical reactions and ion migration under electrical bias [46]. For blue-emitting PeLEDs specifically, which typically require mixed halide compositions (Br/Cl) to achieve higher bandgaps, these challenges are particularly acute due to halogen segregation under operational stresses [46] [48].

This application note details surface modification strategies and encapsulation protocols designed to mitigate these degradation pathways, providing researchers with standardized methodologies to enhance PQD-LED operational stability for next-generation display and lighting applications.

Material-Based Protection Strategies

Surface Ligand Engineering

The surface chemistry of PQDs plays a pivotal role in determining both their optoelectronic properties and environmental stability. Proper ligand selection and management can significantly reduce surface defects while creating a protective barrier against environmental penetrants.

Table 1: Ligand Engineering Strategies for Enhanced PQD Stability

Ligand Type	Specific Examples	Function	Impact on Stability	Reference
Short-Chain Ligands	DDAB, ThPABr	Improved charge transport, reduced insulating layer	Enhanced operational stability, reduced efficiency roll-off	[45] [46]
Multifunctional Ligands	2-thiophenepropylamine bromide (ThPABr)	Simultaneous defect passivation and charge transport enhancement	PLQY increase to 83%, better device performance	[45]
In Situ Ligand Compensation	Oleic acid, oleylamine	Dynamic repair of surface defects during synthesis	Higher intensity and efficiency in treated devices	[45]
Polymer Ligands	Single (6-amino-6-deoxy) beta cyclodextrin	Confined-growth template and stabilization	72.4% PLQY for extremely small CsPbBr3 PQDs (1-2 nm)	[46]

Experimental Protocol 1: In Situ Ligand Compensation (ILC) for Surface Repair

• Objective: To repair surface defects and improve the optoelectronic properties of PQDs through a post-synthetic ligand treatment.
• Materials: Pre-synthesized PQDs, ligand (e.g., ThPABr), solvent (e.g., toluene or hexane), centrifuge.
• Procedure:
  • Prepare a ligand solution by dissolving the selected multifunctional ligand (e.g., ThPABr) in a non-polar solvent at a concentration of 10-20 mg/mL.
  • Mix the PQD solution with the ligand solution at a volumetric ratio of 1:1 to 1:2 under inert atmosphere (e.g., nitrogen glovebox).
  • Stir the mixture at room temperature for 30-60 minutes to allow ligand exchange and surface binding.
  • Precipitate the treated PQDs by adding an anti-solvent (e.g., ethyl acetate) followed by centrifugation at 8000-10000 rpm for 5 minutes.
  • Redisperse the purified PQDs in an appropriate solvent for film deposition.
• Validation: The success of the treatment can be validated by measuring the photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) before and after treatment, with successful treatment typically yielding a significant increase (e.g., from <50% to >80%) [45].

Compositional Engineering and Dimensional Control

Adjusting the chemical composition and dimensionality of perovskites provides a fundamental approach to enhancing intrinsic stability.

Lead-Free Alternatives: Research into lead-free perovskites is advancing as a more eco-friendly alternative. For instance, manganese-based perovskites have demonstrated promising red emission with outstanding PL quantum yield and millisecond-level triplet lifetime, contributing to devices with long operating lifetimes [45].

Low-Dimensional Perovskites: Employing 2D/3D mixed-dimensional perovskites or quasi-2D structures introduces natural quantum wells and large organic cations that act as internal barriers against environmental penetration [45]. However, it is crucial to note that some of these multi-component phases can be thermodynamically unstable, requiring careful optimization of composition and processing conditions to achieve long-term operational stability [47].

Core-Shell Structures: Creating core-shell structures, such as CsPbBr3@amorphous CsPbBrx, has proven effective for blue-emitting PQDs, significantly increasing PLQY (e.g., from 54% to 84% at 463.4 nm) and enhancing stability against moisture [46].

Device Engineering and Encapsulation

Interface and Charge Transport Layer Engineering

Optimizing interfaces between the perovskite emissive layer and charge transport layers is critical for both performance and stability. Incompatible interfaces can accelerate degradation through catalytic reactions or ion migration.

Functional Molecule Surface Infiltration: A recent strategy involves infiltrecting functional molecules like 1,3,5-Tris(1-phenyl-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)benzene (TPBi) into the perovskite film. This treatment reconstructs the film surface and grain boundaries, reducing defects and enhancing electron injection while improving stability [47].

Stable Charge Transport Materials: Replacing conventional materials like PEDOT:PSS, which is hydrophilic and can cause luminescence quenching, with more stable alternatives is beneficial. Inorganic hole transport layers such as NiOx offer improved stability and have demonstrated EQEs up to 14.6% [45]. Similarly, ZnO is a commonly used inorganic electron transport layer valued for its water- and oxygen-resistance, contributing to longer device lifetime [45] [48].

Experimental Protocol 2: TPBi Surface Infiltration Treatment

• Objective: To reconstruct the perovskite film surface, passivate grain boundary defects, and improve electron injection.
• Materials: Pre-deposited perovskite film, TPBi, acetone solvent, spin coater.
• Procedure:
  • Prepare a TPBi solution by dissolving TPBi in acetone at a concentration of 0.5-1.0 mg/mL.
  • Place the substrate with the deposited perovskite film on the spin coater.
  • Dynamically dispense the TPBi solution onto the spinning film at 3000-4000 rpm for 30 seconds inside a nitrogen-filled glovebox.
  • Anneal the treated film on a hotplate at 60-70°C for 5-10 minutes to remove residual solvent.
• Validation: The treatment's effectiveness can be confirmed through reduced non-radiative recombination observed in photoluminescence lifetime measurements and improved electron injection efficiency in completed devices [47].

Advanced Encapsulation Techniques

Thin-film encapsulation represents the final defense line for PeLEDs, creating a physical barrier against moisture and oxygen ingress.

Table 2: Encapsulation Strategies for PQD-LEDs

Encapsulation Approach	Key Features	Advantages	Challenges
Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD)	Ultra-thin, conformal inorganic layers (e.g., Al2O3, HfO2)	Excellent barrier properties, pinhole-free	Possible film damage during processing
Hybrid Organic-Inorganic Layers	Alternating polymer and oxide multilayers	Combines flexibility with barrier properties	More complex fabrication process
Modified Porous Silica Coatings	Hydrophobic silica-based coatings using silane modifiers	Anti-reflective, moisture-resistant, suitable for flexible substrates	Optimization of porosity and adhesion required [49]
Glass Lid Epoxy Encapsulation	Rigid glass lid with UV-cured epoxy edge seal	Proven technology, high performance	Less suitable for flexible devices

Modified Porous Silica Coatings: These coatings, as detailed in patent CN109592908A, are prepared by modifying porous silica with hydrophobic silane coupling agents. The process involves dissolving silica precursors and modifiers in a solvent, followed by deposition via dipping or spin-coating, and final curing. This results in a coating that provides both moisture resistance and anti-reflective properties, which is particularly beneficial for light outcoupling efficiency [49].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for PQD Stabilization

Reagent / Material	Function / Application	Key Benefit
ThPABr	Multifunctional ligand for surface passivation and charge transport	Enhances PLQY and device efficiency
Oleic Acid (OA) & Oleylamine (OAm)	Standard surface ligands for PQD synthesis and stability	Prevents aggregation, maintains colloidal stability
TPBi	Electron transport material and surface infiltration agent	Reduces defects, balances charge injection
DDAB (Didodecyl dimethyl ammonium bromide)	Ligand for synthesis of deep-blue emitting PQDs	Enables narrow bandwidth and remarkable stability
NiOx Nanoparticles	Inorganic hole transport layer	Replaces PEDOT:PSS; improves device stability
ZnO Nanoparticles	Inorganic electron transport layer	Water- and oxygen-resistance; long device lifetime
Silane Coupling Agents	Modifiers for silica-based encapsulation coatings	Impart hydrophobic properties to encapsulation layers

Quantitative Data and Stability Metrics

Table 4: Performance Comparison of Protected PQD-LEDs

Stabilization Approach	Device Color	EQE (%)	Operational Lifetime (LT50)	Key Metric	Reference
TPBi Infiltration + Stable CTLs	Green/Red	>20	Significant improvement	Reduced efficiency roll-off	[47]
Lead-Free Mn Perovskite	Red	High efficiency	Long operating lifetime	Outstanding PLQY	[45]
Sandwich Panel (SWP) Structure	Full-color	Low efficiency roll-off	Excellent stability	Balanced charge injection	[45]
Trifluoroacetate Anions in 3D Perovskite	Not specified	>20% (@ 2270 mA cm⁻²)	-	High radiance (2409 W sr⁻¹ m⁻²), negligible roll-off	[47]

Stability Testing and Validation Protocols

Standardized stability testing is essential for comparing different stabilization strategies and predicting device operational lifespan.

Operational Lifetime Testing (LT50):

• Procedure: Operate devices at a constant current density corresponding to an initial luminance (e.g., 100 cd/m²). Measure the time taken for the luminance to decay to half of its initial value. This duration is reported as LT50.
• Conditions: Testing should be performed in a controlled environment, though accelerated aging tests at elevated temperatures (e.g., 65-85°C) or humidity levels can provide faster comparative data.

Environmental Stress Testing:

• Dark Storage: Store unpackaged devices in ambient conditions (e.g., 25°C, 40-60% RH) and monitor PLQY and film morphology over time (e.g., 1000 hours).
• Damp Heat Test: Expose devices to high humidity and temperature (e.g., 85°C/85% RH), typically with encapsulation, to evaluate the effectiveness of the moisture barrier.

Logical Framework for Degradation Mitigation

The following diagram illustrates the interconnected strategies for combating the primary environmental degradation pathways in PQD-LEDs.

Diagram Title: PQD-LED Degradation Mitigation Framework

Experimental Workflow for Device Stabilization

The following diagram outlines a comprehensive experimental workflow for developing and testing stable PQD-LEDs, integrating the material, device, and encapsulation strategies discussed.

Diagram Title: Stable PQD-LED Fabrication Workflow

Halide perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) have emerged as promising materials for various optoelectronic devices, including light-emitting diodes (LEDs), due to their excellent optical and electrical properties, such as high photoluminescence quantum yields (PLQYs) and narrow emission linewidths [50]. However, the inherent ionic nature of PQDs leads to poor structural stabilities under external stimuli like moisture and heat [50]. A primary degradation pathway is ion migration, particularly halide vacancies, which form easily due to low ionic migration energy within the PQD lattice [50]. This application note details surface strategies to suppress ion migration, lock the halide lattice, and enhance the performance and longevity of PQD-based LEDs.

Surface Passivation Strategies and Protocols

This section provides detailed methodologies for key surface strategies aimed at mitigating ion migration.

Lewis Base Ligand Passivation

Principle: Lewis base ligands with strong electron-donating groups (e.g., phosphines) effectively coordinate with undercoordinated Pb²⁺ ions on the PQD surface, reducing surface defects and suppressing halide vacancy formation [51].

Protocol: TOP (Trioctylphosphine) Passivation for Blue-Emitting CsPbBr₃ QDs [51]

• Synthesis of CsPbBr₃ QDs: Synthesize blue-emitting CsPbBr₃ QDs via the hot-injection method.
  • Prepare a cesium-oleate precursor by dissolving Cs₂CO₃ in oleic acid (OA) and 1-octadecene (ODE) at 120 °C under inert atmosphere.
  • In a separate flask, dissolve PbBr₂ in ODE with OA and oleylamine (OAm) as surface ligands.
  • Degas the lead precursor at 120 °C for 1 hour, then raise the temperature to 80 °C under N₂.
  • Rapidly inject the cesium-oleate precursor into the lead solution and react for 10 seconds before cooling in an ice-water bath.
• Purification: Add methyl acetate to the cooled crude solution and centrifuge. Discard the supernatant and redisperse the precipitate in n-hexane.
• TOP Treatment: Add TOP (concentration range: 0.5-2.0% v/v) to the purified QD solution and stir for 30 minutes at room temperature.
• Post-treatment Purification: Precipitate the TOP-passivated QDs with methyl acetate, centrifuge, and redisperse in n-octane for film formation or device fabrication.

Expected Outcomes: This treatment can achieve a near-unity PLQY of 97.9% and significantly improve long-term emission stability in blue LEDs [51].

Ligand Modification with Short-Chain and Bidentate Ligands

Principle: Replacing long, insulating ligands (e.g., OA, OAm) with shorter or bidentate ligands enhances ligand packing density, improves binding affinity, and reduces steric hindrance, thereby creating a denser barrier against ion migration and environmental degradation [50].

Protocol: Post-Synthesis Ligand Exchange with 2-Aminoethanethiol (AET) [50]

• PQD Synthesis and Purification: Synthesize CsPbI₃ QDs using standard methods (e.g., hot-injection or LARP). Purify using polar solvents like methyl acetate to remove excess ligands.
• Ligand Exchange Solution: Prepare a solution of AET ligand in a suitable solvent (e.g., hexane or toluene). The concentration should be optimized, but a molar excess relative to surface binding sites is typical.
• Exchange Process: Add the AET solution to the purified PQD solution. Stir the mixture for 1-2 hours at room temperature or mild heating (e.g., 50-60 °C) to facilitate ligand exchange.
• Purification of AET-Capped QDs: Precipitate the QDs with a polar anti-solvent (e.g., methyl acetate), centrifuge, and redisperse in an anhydrous solvent for storage or device fabrication.

Expected Outcomes: AET passivation results in strong Pb²⁺-thiolate binding, leading to >95% retention of PL intensity after 60 minutes of water exposure and an improvement in PLQY from 22% to 51% [50].

Binary-Size Mixed Packing

Principle: Mixing PQDs of two distinct sizes in a thin film enhances packing density, reducing interparticle voids and creating a more physically stable lattice that impedes ion migration pathways [52].

Protocol: Fabrication of Densely Packed Binary-Disperse PQD Films [52]

• Synthesis of Two PQD Sizes: Synthesize two batches of CsPbI₃ PQDs with different average sizes (e.g., 10 nm and 14 nm) by controlling the reaction temperature during hot-injection (e.g., 120 °C and 170 °C).
• PQD Mixing: Combine the two PQD populations at an optimal number ratio. Research indicates a ratio of 0.64 (14 nm QDs) to 0.36 (10 nm QDs) achieves maximum packing density [52].
  • Calculate the required mass ratio based on the known sizes and concentrations of the two QD solutions.
• Film Fabrication: Prepare a mixed QD solution with a concentration of 70 mg/mL in n-octane. Spin-coat the solution onto a substrate at 1000 rpm for 10 seconds, followed by a second spin at 2000 rpm for 7 seconds.
• Optional Ligand Exchange: Perform a solid-state ligand exchange on the spin-coated film by treating it with a solution of short-chain ligands (e.g., ammonium acetate in methanol) to further enhance charge transport [52].

Expected Outcomes: The binary-mixed film achieves a higher packing volume fraction (37.1%) compared to monodisperse films, suppressing trap-assisted recombination and yielding longer carrier lifetime [52].

Table 1: Summary of Performance Enhancements from Surface Passivation Strategies

Strategy	Material System	Key Performance Metric	Control Value	After Treatment	Reference
TOP Passivation	Blue-emitting CsPbBr₃ QDs	PLQY	Not Specified	97.9%	[51]
		LED Luminance	Not Specified	328 cd/m²	[51]
AET Ligand Exchange	CsPbI₃ QDs	PLQY	22%	51%	[50]
		PL Retention (Water)	Not Specified	>95% (after 60 min)	[50]
Binary Mixed Packing	CsPbI₃ QD Film	Packing Density	34.7% (mono)	37.1%	[52]
		Solar Cell PCE	Not Specified	14.42%	[52]

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 2: Key Reagents for Surface Passivation of PQDs

Reagent	Function/Application	Key characteristic
Trioctylphosphine (TOP)	Lewis base ligand for surface passivation. Coordinates with Pb²⁺ to reduce halide vacancies and improve colloidal stability [51].	Phosphine group acts as a strong electron donor.
2-Aminoethanethiol (AET)	Short-chain, bidentate ligand for post-synthesis exchange. Thiol group has strong affinity for Pb²⁺, forming a dense passivation layer [50].	Bidentate binding via S and NH₂ groups.
Oleic Acid (OA) / Oleylamine (OAm)	Standard long-chain ligands used during synthesis for size and shape control [50] [52].	Dynamic binding; can lead to low packing density.
Zinc Bromide (ZnBr₂)	Halide salt additive. Enriches the QD surface with Br anions, helping to compensate for halide vacancies during synthesis [51].	Provides a halide-rich environment.
Methyl Acetate	Polar solvent used for purification and precipitation of PQDs to remove excess ligands and by-products [50] [51].	Anti-solvent for PQDs.

Experimental Workflow and Strategic Logic

The following diagram illustrates the logical relationship and decision-making process for selecting an appropriate surface strategy based on the primary stability challenge.

The experimental workflow for implementing a specific protocol, such as Lewis base passivation, is outlined below.

Optimizing Charge Injection Balance at the PQD/Charge Transport Layer Interface

Perovskite quantum dot light-emitting diodes (PeLEDs) represent a groundbreaking advancement in next-generation display and lighting technologies. These devices leverage the exceptional optoelectronic properties of perovskite quantum dots (PQDs), including narrow emission bandwidth, widely tunable colors, and high photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY). However, achieving optimal device performance is fundamentally constrained by inefficient charge injection and transport at the critical interface between the PQD emission layer and adjacent charge transport layers. The inherent insulating nature of the long-chain organic ligands that stabilize PQDs creates a significant charge injection barrier, while surface and bulk defects within the quantum dot structure act as trapping sites that further impede efficient charge transport. This imbalance in charge injection leads to non-radiative recombination, reducing efficiency, compromising operational stability, and slowing the electroluminescent response speed essential for high-refresh-rate displays. This Application Note provides a comprehensive framework of surface modification strategies and interfacial engineering protocols to optimize charge injection balance, thereby enabling the development of high-performance PeLED devices.

Key Optimization Strategies and Performance Data

Research has identified multiple successful pathways for improving charge injection at the PQD/charge transport layer interface. The quantitative outcomes of these strategies, as documented in recent literature, are summarized in the table below.

Table 1: Performance Outcomes of Charge Injection Optimization Strategies

Optimization Strategy	Specific Material/Method	Device Performance Improvement	Key Mechanism	Citation
Interfacial Layer Modification	Ionic Liquid [BMIM]OTF	EQE: 7.57% → 20.94%; Response time reduced by 75%; T50 lifetime: 8.62 h → 131.87 h	Enhanced QD crystallinity, reduced surface defects, lower injection barrier	[11]
HTL Doping	F4-TCNQ in PTAA	Peak EQE increased by 27% (from 4.4% to 5.6%)	Improved hole injection via increased HTL conductivity and reduced injection barrier	[53]
HTL Doping	F6-TCNNQ in PTAA	Driving voltage reduced to 4.70 V at 10 mA/cm²	Enhanced hole transport and improved energy level alignment	[53]
HTL Doping	TCNH14 in PTAA	Driving voltage reduced to 4.38 V at 10 mA/cm²; Current density doubled at 5.0 V	Significant increase in charge carrier density and conductivity	[53]
Surface Ligand Engineering	Cascade Surface Modification (CSM)	PLQY increased from 6% to 18%; Record PCE of 13.3% for CQD solar cells	Comprehensive surface passivation and controlled doping type	[54]
Surface Oxidation	UV-Ozone (UVO) Treatment	Average PCE gain of 18% (peak 8.98%) in QD solar cells	Increased p-doping density, tuned Fermi level for better carrier extraction	[55]

Analysis of Performance Data

The data in Table 1 demonstrates that interfacial engineering and doping strategies can yield substantial improvements in device performance. The most dramatic enhancement is observed with the ionic liquid [BMIM]OTF treatment, which simultaneously boosts efficiency, response speed, and operational lifetime [11]. p-doping of the HTL consistently improves device metrics, with the magnitude of effect depending on the dopant's electron affinity and the resulting energy level alignment [53]. Furthermore, advanced surface ligand engineering is proven to be a critical factor, not only for passivation but also for directly controlling the doping character of the quantum dot solid, thereby facilitating charge injection [54].

Detailed Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Ionic Liquid Treatment for PQD Surface Modification

This protocol details the in-situ treatment of PQDs with the ionic liquid 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium Trifluoromethanesulfonate ([BMIM]OTF) to enhance crystallinity, passivate surface defects, and reduce charge injection barriers [11].

• Primary Objective: To synthesize high-quality PQDs with low defect density and low charge injection barriers for fast, efficient PeLEDs.
• Materials List:
  • Cesium precursor (e.g., Cs2CO3)
  • Lead bromide precursor (PbBr2)
  • Oleic Acid (OA), Oleylamine (OAm)
  • 1-Octadecene (ODE)
  • Ionic Liquid: [BMIM]OTF
  • Solvents: Chlorobenzene (CB), Toluene, Acetone, Methyl Acetate
• Step-by-Step Procedure:
  • Precursor Preparation: Synthesize Cs-oleate and PbBr2 precursor solutions according to standard hot-injection methods.
  • In-Situ Crystallization: a. Dissolve a controlled amount of [BMIM]OTF in chlorobenzene. b. Add the [BMIM]OTF/CB solution to the PbBr2 precursor solution prior to quantum dot nucleation. c. The [BMIM]+ ions coordinate with [PbBr3]− octahedra, slowing nucleation and promoting growth of larger, highly crystalline QDs.
  • Quantum Dot Synthesis: Rapidly inject the Cs-oleate precursor into the PbBr2/[BMIM]OTF mixture under vigorous stirring at a controlled temperature (e.g., 160-180 °C).
  • Purification: Allow the reaction mixture to cool, then precipitate the QDs by adding an anti-solvent (e.g., toluene/acetone mixture). Centrifuge and collect the pellet.
  • Washing: Re-disperse the QD pellet in a solvent like hexane or toluene and precipitate again with methyl acetate. Repeat this centrifugation cycle at least twice to remove unreacted precursors and free ligands.
  • Final Dispersion: Disperse the final purified QDs in anhydrous chlorobenzene or toluene to form a stable ink for film deposition.
• Critical Parameters and Troubleshooting:
  • The concentration of [BMIM]OTF is critical. Optimize between " [BMIM]OTF-1" and " [BMIM]OTF-3" levels to balance size growth and optical properties [11].
  • Reaction temperature and timing must be strictly controlled to ensure reproducible size and crystallinity.
  • All steps must be performed in an inert atmosphere (e.g., nitrogen glovebox) to prevent degradation.

Protocol 2: p-Doping of the Polymeric Hole Transport Layer

This protocol describes the doping of the common HTL PTAA with molecular p-dopants to enhance its conductivity and improve hole injection into the PQD layer [53].

• Primary Objective: To increase the hole conductivity of PTAA and lower the energy barrier for hole injection into the valence band of the PQDs.
• Materials List:
  • Hole Transport Material: PTAA
  • p-dopants: F4-TCNQ, F6-TCNNQ, or TCNH14
  • Solvent: Anhydrous Chlorobenzene or Toluene
• Step-by-Step Procedure:
  • Solution Preparation: a. Prepare a master solution of PTAA in anhydrous chlorobenzene (e.g., 5-10 mg/mL). b. Prepare separate stock solutions of each p-dopant (F4-TCNQ, F6-TCNNQ, TCNH14) in the same solvent. c. Dope the PTAA solution by mixing it with the dopant stock solution to achieve the desired doping ratio. Typical dopant concentrations range from 0.1 to 5 mol% relative to the PTAA repeating unit.
  • Film Deposition: a. Spin-coat the doped PTAA solution onto the prepared substrate (e.g., ITO/PEDOT:PSS). b. Use optimized spin speed and time to achieve a uniform film with target thickness (e.g., 20-40 nm).
  • Annealing: Soft-bake the deposited HTL film on a hotplate at 70-100 °C for 10-20 minutes to remove residual solvent.
• Critical Parameters and Troubleshooting:
  • Solution preparation and film deposition must be conducted in an inert atmosphere.
  • The doping efficiency is highly dependent on the energy level alignment between the dopant's LUMO and the HTL's HOMO. F4-TCNQ and F6-TCNNQ generally provide stronger doping effects than TCNH14 due to their higher electron affinities [53].
  • Excessive doping can lead to film inhomogeneity or act as quenching sites; therefore, the doping concentration must be carefully optimized.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Reagent Solutions

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents for Interface Optimization

Reagent / Material	Function / Role in Optimization	Key characteristic / Consideration
Ionic Liquid [BMIM]OTF	In-situ additive to enhance PQD crystallinity and passivate surface defects via coordination with Pb²⁺ and Br⁻ ions.	Reduces surface trap states, increases PLQY, and lowers charge injection barrier. [11]
p-Dopant F4-TCNQ	Molecular p-dopant for HTLs; accepts electrons from PTAA, increasing hole density and conductivity.	High electron affinity (~5.2 eV) enables efficient charge transfer with common HTLs. [53]
p-Dopant F6-TCNNQ	Strong molecular p-dopant alternative to F4-TCNQ for HTLs.	Very high electron affinity, can achieve higher conductivity in certain polymer systems. [53]
PTAA (HTL Matrix)	A common, high-performance polymeric hole transport material.	Its deep HOMO level makes it well-suited for doping with strong acceptors like F4-TCNQ. [53]
Thiol Ligands (e.g., CTA)	Used in post-synthesis surface ligand exchange to program p-type character and solubility of CQD inks.	Bifunctional ligand (-SH binds to QD, -NH₂ group ensures colloidal stability in processing solvents). [54]
UV-Ozone Treatment	A post-deposition, facile optical method to controllably oxidize the QD surface and increase p-doping density.	Tunes the Fermi level of QD hole transport layers to deeper values for better carrier extraction. [55]

Strategic Workflow and Decision Pathways

The following diagram illustrates a logical workflow for diagnosing charge injection problems and selecting an appropriate optimization strategy based on device characterization and material properties.

Achieving balanced charge injection at the PQD/charge transport layer interface is a paramount requirement for realizing the full commercial potential of PeLED technology. The strategies and protocols outlined in this document—ranging from molecular doping of organic HTLs to advanced surface modification of the quantum dots themselves—provide a robust toolkit for researchers to address this critical challenge. The data demonstrates that these approaches can yield dramatic improvements in device efficiency, response speed, and operational lifetime. Future research should focus on the synergistic combination of these strategies, such as employing doped HTLs in conjunction with surface-optimized PQDs, and further exploring the development of universal, scalable surface chemistry protocols that are applicable across the full color gamut of perovskite materials, with particular emphasis on solving the persistent challenges in cadmium-free blue-emitting devices.

Within the broader research on perovskite quantum dot (PQD)-based light-emitting diodes (PeLEDs), achieving high-performance blue emission remains a significant challenge. While red and green PeLEDs have seen external quantum efficiencies (EQEs) exceed 25-30%, blue-emitting devices consistently demonstrate lower efficiency and inferior operational stability [51] [8] [56]. This "blue gap" is primarily attributed to the increased defect density, particularly halide vacancies and uncoordinated Pb²⁺ ions, which become more pronounced in the ultra-small PQDs required for strong quantum-confined blue emission [51]. This application note details targeted surface modification protocols, grounded in ligand engineering, that effectively passivate these surface defects, thereby enhancing the photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) and spectral stability of blue-emitting PQDs.

Surface Modification Strategies and Performance Data

The strategic application of Lewis base ligands for surface passivation has proven highly effective in mitigating non-radiative recombination pathways in blue-emitting PQDs. The performance enhancements from various ligand modification strategies are quantified in the table below.

Table 1: Quantitative Performance Enhancement of Blue-Emitting PQDs via Surface Modification

Perovskite System	Ligand / Additive	Key Function	PLQY / EQE Enhancement	Stability Improvement	Emission Peak
CsPbBr₃ QDs [51]	Trioctylphosphine (TOP)	Passivates surface defects via Pb²⁺ coordination	PLQY: 97.9% (Near-unity)	Improved color stability in LEDs	~483 nm (Blue)
Quasi-2D Perovskite [57]	Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)	Defect passivation & strain modulation	EQE: 6.42x vs. pristine	Stable EL under high voltage	Blue
Quasi-2D Perovskite [58]	G SALT	Rearranges phase distribution	EQE: 2.5%	Stable PL under UV & heat	456 nm (Deep Blue)
CsPbI₃ PQDs [5]	Trioctylphosphine Oxide (TOPO)	Suppresses non-radiative recombination	PL Enhancement: 18%	-	~700-713 nm (Red)

The data demonstrates that Lewis base ligands like TOP are exceptionally effective for zero-dimensional QDs, directly coordinating with undercoordinated Pb²⁺ ions to achieve near-unity PLQY [51]. For quasi-2D perovskites, polymers like PVP and multi-functional organic salts like G SALT play a dual role, not only passivating defects but also modulating internal strain and phase distribution, which is critical for stabilizing blue emission against phase segregation [58] [57].

Experimental Protocols

Protocol: Trioctylphosphine (TOP) Passivation of CsPbBr₃ Quantum Dots

This protocol describes the post-synthetic treatment of ultra-small CsPbBr₃ QDs for high-efficiency blue emission [51].

3.1.1 Materials and Reagents

• CsPbBr₃ QDs: Synthesized via hot-injection at 80°C (emission ~483 nm).
• TOP (Trioctylphosphine): 90%, used as the Lewis base ligand.
• Solvents: n-Hexane (≥99.0%) and Methyl Acetate (99%), for purification.
• Centrifuge Tubes: 50 mL capacity.

3.1.2 Step-by-Step Procedure

• QD Synthesis: Synthesize blue-emitting CsPbBr₃ QDs using the standard hot-injection method with a low reaction temperature of 80°C to achieve a sub-5 nm particle size.
• Purification: Isolate and purify the pristine QDs by centrifuging the crude solution with methyl acetate, then decant the supernatant.
• TOP Treatment:
  • Re-disperse the purified QD pellet in 20 mL of n-hexane.
  • Add TOP ligand directly to the QD dispersion with a molar ratio of TOP:Pb²⁺ at 1:1.
  • Stir the mixture vigorously for 60 minutes at room temperature to allow complete ligand exchange/passivation.
• Purification (Post-Treatment): Precipitate the TOP-treated QDs by adding methyl acetate, followed by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 5 minutes.
• Storage: Re-disperse the final QD pellet in n-octane or n-hexane to form a stable ink for device fabrication. Store at 4°C in a dark environment.

3.1.3 Critical Notes

• The reaction temperature during initial QD synthesis is critical; 80°C is optimal for forming ultra-small QDs for blue emission.
• The duration of TOP stirring is crucial for effective surface coverage and defect passivation.

Protocol: Polymer Additive Treatment for Quasi-2D Perovskite Films

This protocol outlines the incorporation of PVP as a Lewis base additive into quasi-2D perovskite precursor solutions for blue PeLEDs [57].

3.2.1 Materials and Reagents

• Perovskite Precursors: PbBr₂, MABr, etc., as required for the quasi-2D composition.
• PVP (Polyvinylpyrrolidone): Average molecular weight ~55,000.
• Solvent: N, N-Dimethylformamide (DMF) or Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO).
• Syringe Filters: 0.22 µm PTFE, for filtration.

3.2.2 Step-by-Step Procedure

• Solution Preparation:
  • Prepare the standard quasi-2D perovskite precursor solution in DMF/DMSO.
  • Separately, prepare a PVP stock solution by dissolving PVP powder in the same solvent at a concentration of 1 mg/mL.
• Blending: Add the PVP stock solution to the perovskite precursor solution with a volume ratio of 1:9 (PVP stock : perovskite precursor). Vortex the mixture for 30 seconds to ensure homogeneity.
• Film Formation:
  • Spin-coat the blended solution onto the pre-cleaned substrate (e.g., ITO/PEDOT:PSS).
  • Anneal the film on a hotplate at 80°C for 15 minutes to remove residual solvent and crystallize the perovskite.

3.2.3 Critical Notes

• The concentration of PVP must be optimized; excessive polymer can impede charge transport.
• Ensure complete dissolution of PVP in the solvent before mixing with the perovskite precursors to avoid film inhomogeneity.

Workflow and Mechanism Diagrams

Surface Passivation Workflow

The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow from problem identification to performance validation for surface modification of blue-emitting PQDs.

Ligand Coordination Mechanism

This diagram depicts the molecular-level mechanism of surface passivation on a PQD, showing how different ligands coordinate with surface defects.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 2: Essential Materials for Surface Modification of Blue-Emitting PQDs

Reagent / Material	Function / Role	Key Characteristics & Notes
Trioctylphosphine (TOP)	Lewis base ligand for defect passivation [51]	Coordinates with undercoordinated Pb²⁺; enhances PLQY and colloidal stability.
Trioctylphosphine Oxide (TOPO)	Lewis base ligand for defect passivation [5]	Similar function to TOP; shown to provide 18% PL enhancement in CsPbI₃ PQDs.
Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)	Polymer additive for strain modulation [57]	Passivates grain boundaries, suppresses halide migration, and modulates internal stress.
G SALT	Organic salt for phase stabilization [58]	Rearranges phase distribution in quasi-2D perovskites via multiple interactions.
ZnBr₂	Halide precursor for surface enrichment [51]	Compensates for Br⁻ loss on the surface of small-size QDs, improving uniformity.
Methyl Acetate	Anti-solvent for purification	Used to precipitate and purify QDs post-synthesis without damaging the structure.
1-Octadecene (ODE)	Non-polar solvent for synthesis	High-boiling point solvent used as the reaction medium in hot-injection synthesis.

For perovskite quantum dot-based light-emitting diodes (PQD-LEDs), the operational lifetime, often quantified as LT50 (the time taken for the luminance to decrease by 50% from its initial value), remains a critical barrier to commercial viability [59]. A principal factor dictating LT50 is the susceptibility of the PQD surface to degradation from environmental stressors and electrical operation [60]. This application note details the fundamental surface chemistry challenges and provides validated experimental protocols for modifying and passivating PQD surfaces to significantly enhance device LT50, framed within a broader research thesis on surface modification for PQD-LEDs.

The Surface Chemistry Challenge in Blue PQD-LEDs

The ionic nature and high surface energy of perovskite quantum dots make them particularly prone to degradation, which manifests as a rapid decline in luminescence and operational lifetime [60] [48]. Key surface-related challenges include:

• Ligand Instability: Surface ligands, which stabilize the nanocrystals in solution, can readily desorb when the QDs are subjected to light, heat, or electrical current. This desorption creates surface defects that act as non-radiative recombination centers, quenching photoluminescence (PL) and reducing efficiency [60].
• Ion Migration: Under electrical bias, ions from the perovskite lattice can migrate, particularly via surface pathways, leading to accelerated degradation and device failure [48].
• Environmental Sensitivity: The PQD surface is highly sensitive to moisture and oxygen, which can penetrate the device and cause irreversible decomposition [60].

Addressing these challenges requires a multi-faceted approach centered on robust surface chemistry to create a stable, low-defect interface, thereby directly extending the device LT50.

Surface Modification Strategies and Experimental Protocols

Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) for PQD Passivation

Atomic Layer Deposition offers a conformal and precise method for applying an inorganic passivation layer directly onto PQDs, shielding them from environmental factors and electrochemical degradation [60].

Experimental Protocol: Al₂O₃ ALD Coating on FAPbBr₃ PQDs

• PQD Synthesis:

  • Synthesize FAPbBr₃ PQDs using the Ligand-Assisted Reprecipitation (LARP) method at room temperature [60].
  • Precursor Solution: Combine 500 µL of oleic acid (OA), 0.16 mmol formamidinium bromide (FABr), 0.2 mmol lead(II) bromide (PbBr₂), and 20 µL of octylamine.
  • Precipitation: Add 10 mL of toluene to the mixture and stir for 5 minutes. Introduce 5 mL of acetonitrile to trigger crystallization.
  • Purification: Centrifuge the solution at 6000 rpm for 25 minutes. Discard the supernatant and redissolve the pellet in 10 mL of toluene.
  • Surface Optimization: Add 30 µL of an excess-lead-ion solution (1.512 mmol PbBr₂ in propionic acid, butylamine, and n-hexane) to fill halogen anion vacancies and improve ligand binding [60].

• ALD Passivation:

  • Use an atomic layer deposition system equipped for powder coating (e.g., Atomila GT by SkyTech Institute).
  • Precursors: Use Trimethylaluminum (TMA, Al(CH₃)₃) and Ozone (O₃) as co-reactants.
  • Process Conditions:
    • Temperature: 150 °C
    • Number of Cycles: 200
    • Deposition Rate: ~2.5 Å/cycle
  • Procedure: The rotating chamber generates a uniform powder flow field, ensuring the TMA and O₃ precursors react with the surface of the individual PQDs to form a conformal Al₂O₃ coating [60].

• Film Fabrication:

  • Mix the passivated PQDs (PeQDs) with KSF red phosphor, nanoscale TiO₂ scattering particles, a dispersant, and UV-curable glue.
  • Pour the mixture into a mold, remove air bubbles under vacuum, and cure by exposure to UV light to form a solid, stable PeQD film for device integration [60].

Table 1: Key Reagents for ALD Passivation Protocol

Research Reagent	Function/Explanation
FABr & PbBr₂	Precursors for forming the perovskite crystal lattice.
Oleic Acid (OA) & Octylamine	Surface ligands that control nanocrystal growth and provide colloidal stability.
Trimethylaluminum (TMA)	Aluminum precursor for the ALD reaction, forming Al₂O₃ upon reaction with O₃.
Ozone (O₃)	Co-reactant in the ALD process that oxidizes the TMA to form Al₂O₃.

Surface Ligand Engineering

Exchanging or cross-linking native, labile ligands with more robust molecules can significantly enhance stability.

Experimental Protocol: Halide-Anion-Rich Surface Treatment

• Post-Synthesis Treatment: After the initial purification of PQDs, add a solution rich in halide anions (e.g., Bromide ions in toluene) to the purified QD solution.
• Ion Exchange: Stir the mixture to allow halide anions to bind to surface vacancies, improving the stoichiometry and reducing surface defects [60].
• Ligand Cross-linking: For certain bidentate or polymeric ligands, introduce a cross-linking agent (e.g., a difunctional molecule) to create a robust network around the PQD, locking the ligands in place and providing a barrier against moisture and oxygen.

The logical workflow connecting surface chemistry strategies to the ultimate goal of improved LT50 is outlined below.

Performance Data and LT50 Correlation

Implementing these surface modifications has a direct and measurable impact on key device performance metrics, including LT50. The following table summarizes performance data from devices employing these strategies, illustrating the critical link between surface chemistry and operational lifetime.

Table 2: Impact of Surface Modification on Blue PQD-LED and Phosphorescent OLED Performance

Device / Material Type	Surface Modification Strategy	Key Performance Metrics (LT50, EQE, etc.)	Reference / Context
FAPbBr₃ PQD Film	Al₂O₃ coating via ALD (This protocol)	Excellent wavelength stability & reliability in 60°C/90% humidity tests; Enabled high-speed VLC system [60].	[60]
Blue Phosphorescent OLED	Novel Ir(III) emitters with bulky carbazolyl ligands	LT50: 1237 h at 1000 cd m⁻²; EQE: 31.62%; Minimal efficiency roll-off (20.58% at 100,000 cd m⁻²) [59].	[59]
Blue Hyper-OLED	Emitter design for color purity	LT50: 318 h at 1000 cd m⁻²; EQE: 29.78%; FWHM: 20 nm [59].	[59]
General Blue PQD-LEDs	(Status Quo from literature survey)	LT50 values often reported in seconds or minutes at low brightness; EQE typically below 15% [48].	[48]

Accelerated Lifetime Testing Protocol

To reliably quantify the improvement in LT50, a standardized and rigorous testing protocol is essential.

Experimental Protocol: Operational Lifetime (LT50) Testing

• Device Conditioning: Operate the freshly fabricated PQD-LED at a constant current density to achieve an initial luminance (e.g., 100 cd m⁻² or 1000 cd m⁻²) in a controlled environment (e.g., inert gas glovebox).
• Stability Measurement: Continuously drive the device under constant current mode while monitoring the luminance (L) over time using a photodiode or spectrometer.
• Data Analysis: Plot the normalized luminance (L/L₀) as a function of time. The LT50 is determined as the time at which the normalized luminance decays to 0.5 (50% of its initial value) [59].
• Accelerated Testing: To simulate long-term operation, tests can be performed at elevated temperatures (e.g., 60°C or 85°C) and/or higher initial luminance (e.g., 10,000 cd m⁻²). The acceleration factors can be modeled using the Arrhenius relationship or similar models.

The diagram below illustrates the primary signaling pathways and interactions during electron injection and transport, which are critical for understanding operational degradation.

Scalability and Reproducibility Challenges in Surface Treatment Processes

Surface treatment processes are pivotal in the development of advanced materials, including perovskite quantum dot (PQD)-based light-emitting diodes (LEDs). These processes directly influence the optoelectronic properties, stability, and performance of the final device. Achieving uniform surface morphology and consistent chemical composition through reliable and scalable methods remains a significant challenge in transitioning laboratory-scale breakthroughs into commercially viable products. This application note details the prevalent challenges and provides standardized protocols to enhance the reproducibility and scalability of surface treatments, with a specific focus on applications in PQD-LED research and development.

Key Challenges in Surface Treatment

The primary obstacles in surface treatment processes for advanced materials like PQDs can be categorized into issues of reproducibility and scalability.

Reproducibility Challenges

Reproducibility is often hindered by inconsistencies in analytical measurements and process control.

• Measurement Variability: The characterization of nanoforms, essential for PQDs, requires measuring key descriptors such as size, shape, and surface chemistry. Studies evaluating methods like Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) show that while established methods like TEM for size measurement can have a relative standard deviation of reproducibility (RSDR) as low as 5-20%, less mature techniques like TGA for measuring organic impurities can exhibit much poorer reproducibility [61]. This variability means that measured differences between samples must be significantly larger than the method's achievable accuracy to be considered real.
• Process Parameter Control: In additive manufacturing, techniques like acetone vapor smoothing for polymers can effectively reduce surface roughness but often compromise dimensional accuracy, indicating a delicate balance between process parameters and outcomes that is difficult to replicate consistently [62].

Scalability Challenges

Scalability concerns arise when moving from small-batch laboratory processing to industrial-scale production.

• Coating Uniformity: Physical deposition methods like sputtering can produce uneven coatings due to their directional nature, creating a significant hurdle for coating large-area substrates uniformly, which is a requirement for display and lighting applications [62].
• Methodological Limitations: Some highly effective laboratory techniques lack a straightforward path to large-scale implementation. For instance, while ultrasonic nanocrystal surface modification can improve the properties of alloys, its application to large or complex components is non-trivial [63].

Quantitative Data on Surface Treatment Efficacy

The table below summarizes the performance of different surface treatment methods applied to Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) polymer parts, providing a quantitative perspective on their effectiveness. This data illustrates the trade-offs between roughness improvement, hardness, and dimensional stability that are central to process scalability and reproducibility.

Table 1: Comparison of Surface Treatment Techniques on FDM-Produced ABS Parts

Treatment Method	Category	Average Roughness (Ra)	Change in Hardness	Key Limitations
Uncoated (Baseline)	N/A	~22.0 μm	Baseline	Poor surface finish, layer-induced anisotropy [62]
Spray Painting	Coating	6.5 μm (70% reduction)	Increased by 19%	Requires multiple steps (sanding, priming) [62]
Acetone Dipping	Chemical	14.2 μm (35% reduction)	Nearly unchanged	Causes dimensional distortion [62]
Copper Sputtering	Physical/Coating	Not fully quantified	Improved	Uneven, non-uniform coating due to directional deposition [62]

Experimental Protocols for Surface Treatment and Analysis

To address reproducibility challenges, standardized protocols for common surface treatments and subsequent characterization are essential.

Protocol: Solvent-Based Surface Smoothing for Polymers

This protocol is adapted from studies on post-processing FDM parts [62].

• Objective: To reduce the surface roughness of polymer components through controlled chemical dissolution.
• Materials:
  • Acetone (≥ 99.5% purity)
  • Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) specimens
  • Glass container with a sealed lid
  • Fume hood
  • Personal protective equipment (PPE): nitrile gloves, safety goggles
• Procedure:
  • Safety: Perform all steps within a fume hood.
  • Immersion: Pour acetone into the glass container. Fully immerse the ABS specimen for 30 seconds using tweezers.
  • Drying: Remove the specimen and allow it to air-dry vertically in the fume hood for a minimum of 60 minutes.
  • Characterization: Proceed to surface morphology analysis (Protocol 3.3).

Protocol: Abrasive Blast Cleaning for Metal Surfaces

This protocol outlines a standardized approach for preparing steel substrates, based on industry standards [64].

• Objective: To clean a steel surface to a "Near-White Metal" condition (NACE No. 2/SSPC-SP10) prior to coating application.
• Materials:
  • Carbon steel substrates
  • Appropriate abrasive blast media (e.g., mineral grit)
  • Abrasive blasting equipment
  • Compressed air source (oil-free)
  • PPE: Respiratory protection, gloves, protective suit
• Procedure:
  • Setup: Establish a contained blasting area. Inspect the blasting nozzle for wear.
  • Blasting: Hold the nozzle at a consistent 70-80 degree angle to the surface, maintaining a distance of 30-50 cm. Move the nozzle in a steady, overlapping pattern until the surface is uniformly grey-white.
  • Inspection: Visually inspect the surface without magnification. The standard is met when at least 95% of each unit area is free of visible oil, grease, dust, rust, and coating, with only random staining permitted on the remaining 5% [64].
  • Post-Cleaning: Remove all residual abrasive dust using clean, oil-free compressed air or brushing.

Protocol: Surface Morphology and Composition Analysis

This protocol describes the characterization of surfaces post-treatment [62].

• Objective: To qualitatively and quantitatively assess changes in surface morphology and elemental composition.
• Materials:
  • Treated and untreated samples
  • Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)
  • Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX) detector
  • Surface profilometer
• Procedure:
  • SEM Imaging: Mount the sample on an SEM stub. Image the surface at multiple magnifications (e.g., 100x and 500x) to observe microstructural changes, coating distribution, and surface irregularities.
  • EDX Analysis: In the same instrument, perform EDX point analysis or mapping on the imaged areas to determine the elemental composition and distribution (e.g., to confirm the presence of a copper coating).
  • Profilometry: Use a contact or optical profilometer to trace the surface topography. Extract the average roughness (Ra) value from multiple line scans to quantify smoothness.

Workflow Visualization for Scalable Surface Treatment

The following diagram outlines a generalized, scalable workflow for the surface treatment of materials, integrating quality control checkpoints to ensure reproducibility.

Diagram Title: Scalable Surface Treatment Workflow

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

The table below lists key reagents and materials used in surface modification processes relevant to PQD and advanced material research.

Table 2: Essential Reagents for Surface Modification

Reagent/Material	Function	Application Example
Organosilanes (e.g., APTES)	Surface functionalization via silanization; introduces amino or other functional groups to enhance adhesion and biocompatibility [63] [65].	Functionalization of porous silicon and metal oxide surfaces for subsequent bioconjugation [63].
Click Chemistry Reagents	Efficient and selective coupling reactions for bioconjugation; provide high yield and specificity under mild conditions [65].	Grafting targeting ligands (e.g., antibodies, peptides) onto nanoparticles for drug delivery [65].
PEDOT:PSS	Conducting polymer used as a hole-injection layer; improves charge transport in electronic devices [8].	Hole-transport layer in perovskite quantum dot light-emitting diodes (PQD-LEDs) [8] [48].
Solvents (e.g., Acetone)	Chemical smoothing and cleaning agent; dissolves organic contaminants and slightly melts polymer surfaces to reduce roughness [62].	Post-processing solvent for smoothing FDM-printed ABS parts [62].
Abrasive Blast Media	Physical surface preparation; removes mill scale, rust, and old coatings to create a clean, profiled substrate [64].	Preparing steel surfaces to SSPC-SP 5 (White Metal) or SP 10 (Near-White Metal) standards before coating [64].

Benchmarking Performance: Quantifying the Impact of Surface Modification on PQD-LED Efficacy

The development of perovskite quantum dot-based light-emitting diodes (PQD-LEDs) represents a transformative advancement in next-generation display and lighting technologies. For researchers and scientists focused on the translation of this technology from lab to market, a deep understanding of the relationship between surface modification techniques and core performance metrics is paramount. This document, framed within a broader thesis on surface modification for PQD research, provides a detailed analysis of how strategic material and engineering interventions enhance External Quantum Efficiency (EQE), Luminance, and Color Purity. By synthesizing the latest research, we present structured quantitative data, detailed experimental protocols, and essential reagent solutions to accelerate your development of high-performance PQD-LEDs.

Performance Metrics Analysis

The enhancement of PQD-LED performance is a multi-faceted endeavor, involving innovations in nanocrystal synthesis, surface ligand engineering, and device architecture optimization. The following section breaks down the key performance metrics and the strategies employed to improve them.

The table below summarizes the enhancements in critical performance metrics achieved through various surface modification and device engineering strategies.

Table 1: Performance Metrics of PQD-LEDs via Different Engineering Strategies

Material/Strategy	Emission Color	Max. EQE (%)	Max. Luminance (cd m⁻²)	Color Purity (FWHM nm)	Key Enhancement Technique
CsPbI₃ PQDs (L-PHE Ligand) [5]	Red	>20 (monochromatic)	Information Missing	~24-28	Surface passivation with L-Phenylalanine
CsPbI₃ PQDs (TOPO Ligand) [5]	Red	Information Missing	Information Missing	Information Missing	Surface passivation with TOPO
Flexible PeLEDs (3D Thin Film) [8]	Green, Red	>30	1.1 x 10⁶	~20	Substrate/electrode optimization
Flexible PeLEDs (Blue) [8]	Blue	~20	Information Missing	Information Missing	Perovskite/polymer composites
Blue InP QLEDs [66]	Blue	<3	<5,000	Information Missing	Core-shell structures, ligand exchange
Red InP QLEDs [66]	Red	22.2	>110,000	Information Missing	Mature synthesis & encapsulation
QD-based μ-LEDs [67]	Full Color	Information Missing	Information Missing	20-30	Color conversion on blue μ-LEDs

Analysis of Enhancement Strategies

• Surface Ligand Engineering for Efficiency and Stability: The passivation of surface defects is a critical strategy for improving EQE. Studies on red-emitting CsPbI₃ PQDs demonstrate that ligand engineering directly suppresses non-radiative recombination. For instance, passivation with trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO) and l-phenylalanine (L-PHE) led to PL enhancements of 18% and 3%, respectively. Notably, L-PHE-modified PQDs exhibited superior operational stability, retaining over 70% of their initial PL intensity after 20 days of continuous UV exposure [5]. This underscores the role of ligand selection in balancing high efficiency with long-term stability.

• Device Architecture for High Luminance and Flexibility: For flexible PeLEDs, the choice of substrate and electrode is paramount. Researchers have achieved exceptional durability by depositing perovskite emitting layers on elastic PDMS/PET substrates, with devices retaining 94.5% luminance after 5000 bending cycles at a 2.5 mm radius [8]. The use of advanced electrodes like graphene or AgNW/PI composites mitigates exciton quenching and improves mechanical durability, enabling devices to function reliably under strains of up to 20% over multiple cycles [8].

• Color Purity and Tunability for Displays: The narrow emission bandwidth (Full Width at Half Maximum, FWHM) of PQDs is a key advantage for displays, enabling a wide color gamut. PQDs typically exhibit FWHM values of ~20-30 nm, which is superior to the ~40 nm FWHM of OLEDs [8] [67]. This intrinsic property, combined with the wide color tunability of perovskites through quantum confinement and halide composition, positions PQD-LEDs as a leading technology for ultra-high-definition displays that can meet the stringent Rec. 2020 color standard [67].

Experimental Protocols

This section provides detailed methodologies for key experiments cited in this review, serving as a practical guide for replicating and building upon the reported enhancements.

Protocol: Surface Ligand Modification of CsPbI₃ PQDs

This protocol is adapted from studies investigating the effect of ligands like TOPO and L-PHE on the optical properties and stability of red-emitting PQDs [5].

• Objective: To synthesize high-quality CsPbI₃ PQDs and subsequently modify their surface with organic ligands to enhance photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) and environmental stability.
• Materials:
  • Precursors: Cesium carbonate (Cs₂CO₃, 99%), Lead(II) iodide (PbI₂, 99%)
  • Ligands: Trioctylphosphine (TOP, 99%), Trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO, 99%), l-phenylalanine (L-PHE, 98%)
  • Solvent: 1-octadecene (ODE)
  • Equipment: Three-neck flask, Schlenk line, syringe pumps, thermocouple, centrifuge.
• Step-by-Step Procedure:
  • Preparation of Cs-oleate Precursor: Load Cs₂CO₃ and ODE into a flask. Dry and degas the mixture at 120°C under vacuum for one hour. Heat under an inert atmosphere (e.g., N₂) to 150°C until the Cs₂CO₃ is completely dissolved.
  • Synthesis of CsPbI₃ PQDs: In a separate three-neck flask, combine PbI₂ and ODE. Dry and degas at 120°C for one hour. Heat the mixture to 170°C under N₂. Rapidly inject the preheated Cs-oleate precursor (e.g., 1.5 mL) into the PbI₂ solution and let the reaction proceed for 5-10 seconds before immediately cooling the reaction bath in an ice-water mixture.
  • Purification: Centrifuge the crude solution at high speed (e.g., 8000 rpm for 10 minutes) to separate the PQDs. Decant the supernatant and re-disperse the pellet in a non-polar solvent like hexane or toluene.
  • Ligand Modification: Divide the purified PQD solution into aliquots. Introduce a controlled molar excess of the target ligand (TOP, TOPO, or L-PHE) to each aliquot. Stir the mixture for several hours to allow for ligand exchange and surface passivation.
  • Final Purification and Storage: Precipitate and wash the ligand-modified PQDs via centrifugation to remove excess, unbound ligands. Finally, disperse the PQDs in an anhydrous solvent and store under an inert atmosphere for subsequent characterization and device fabrication.
• Key Parameters for Optimization:
  • Reaction Temperature: An optimal synthesis temperature of 170°C produces PQDs with the highest PL intensity and narrowest FWHM [5].
  • Ligand Choice: TOPO and L-PHE have been shown to effectively coordinate with undercoordinated Pb²⁺ ions, suppressing non-radiative recombination pathways [5].

Protocol: Fabrication of a Flexible PeLED with a Composite Electrode

This protocol outlines the strategy for creating mechanically robust flexible PeLEDs, leveraging advanced electrodes to maintain performance under strain [8].

• Objective: To fabricate a flexible PeLED that maintains stable performance under repeated bending and stretching.
• Materials:
  • Flexible Substrate: Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) or pre-stretched elastomer (e.g., VHB 4905).
  • Composite Electrode: A hybrid material such as a film of silver nanowires (AgNWs) embedded in polyimide (PI) or a mixture of AgNWs, MXene, and PEDOT:PSS.
  • Perovskite Layer: Precursors for the desired emissive perovskite (e.g., MAPbBr₃ for green emission).
  • Charge Transport Layers: Materials for Hole Injection/Transport (HIL/HTL) and Electron Injection/Transport (EIL/ETL) layers suitable for the device stack.
• Step-by-Step Procedure:
  • Substrate Preparation: Clean the flexible substrate (e.g., PET) thoroughly with solvents and UV-ozone treatment to ensure a clean, hydrophilic surface.
  • Electrode Deposition: Deposit the composite electrode onto the substrate. For an AgNWs/PI electrode, this may involve spray-coating or spin-coating AgNWs followed by a thin layer of PI, then curing. For a graphene electrode, transfer the graphene layer onto the substrate.
  • Device Stack Fabrication: Sequentially deposit the functional layers onto the flexible electrode. Standard layers include:
    • Hole Injection Layer (HIL)
    • Hole Transport Layer (HTL)
    • Perovskite Emissive Layer (deposited via spin-coating or evaporation)
    • Electron Transport Layer (ETL)
    • Top Electrode (e.g., thin metal film)
  • Encapsulation: Apply a protective encapsulation layer (e.g., another flexible substrate or a thin-film barrier) to shield the device from moisture and oxygen.
  • Mechanical Testing: Characterize the device's flexibility by measuring performance metrics (e.g., luminance, EQE) while subjecting it to repeated bending cycles at defined radii (e.g., 2.5 mm) or controlled strain.
• Key Parameters for Optimization:
  • Electrode Conductivity and Transparency: The composite electrode must be optimized for both high conductivity and high optical transparency to maximize light outcoupling.
  • Interfacial Adhesion: Ensure strong adhesion between all layers in the device stack to prevent delamination during bending.
  • Neutral Mechanical Plane: Design the device stack so that the mechanically fragile perovskite layer is located near the neutral mechanical plane, where strain is minimized during bending [8].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

The following table catalogs essential materials used in the featured PQD-LED experiments, with a brief explanation of each item's function.

Table 2: Key Research Reagents and Materials for PQD-LED Development

Reagent/Material	Function/Application	Key Characteristics
CsPbI₃ Perovskite QDs	Red emissive layer in LEDs [5]	Bandgap ~1.73 eV, high absorption coefficient, tunable emission.
Trioctylphosphine Oxide (TOPO)	Surface passivation ligand for PQDs [5]	Coordinates with undercoordinated Pb²⁺ ions, suppresses non-radiative recombination.
l-Phenylalanine (L-PHE)	Surface passivation ligand for PQDs [5]	Enhances photostability, provides effective defect passivation.
Silver Nanowires (AgNWs)	Flexible transparent conductive electrode [8]	High flexibility, conductivity, forms percolation network in composites.
Graphene	Flexible transparent anode [8]	High flexibility, superior conductivity, mitigates exciton quenching.
MXene (e.g., Ti₃C₂Tₓ)	Component in hybrid composite electrodes [8]	Excellent conductivity, improves charge transport and heat dissipation.
Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)	Flexible substrate or elastomeric matrix [8]	High elasticity, optical transparency, thermal stability.

Workflow and Signaling Visualizations

The following diagrams illustrate the logical workflow of a core experimental process and the conceptual "pathway" of performance enhancement in PQD-LEDs.

Experimental Workflow for PQD-LED Fabrication

This diagram outlines the key stages in the synthesis, modification, and device integration of high-performance PQDs.

Diagram 1: PQD-LED Fabrication Workflow

Performance Enhancement Pathway

This conceptual diagram visualizes how surface modification strategies target specific challenges to ultimately enhance the key performance metrics of the final LED device.

Diagram 2: Performance Enhancement Strategy Pathway

Comparative Analysis of Lead-Based (CsPbX3) vs. Emerging Lead-Free PQD Surface Chemistry

The surface chemistry of perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) is a critical determinant of their optical properties and environmental stability, particularly for their application in light-emitting diodes (LEDs). The ionic nature of perovskites makes them susceptible to degradation from moisture, oxygen, and heat, with surface defects acting as centers for non-radiative recombination that quench photoluminescence. This application note provides a comparative analysis of surface modification strategies for lead-based (CsPbX₃) and emerging lead-free PQDs, framing the discussion within the context of enhancing performance and stability for LED applications. We summarize key quantitative data in structured tables and provide detailed experimental protocols to guide research in this field.

Fundamental Properties and Surface Chemistry

Structural and Optical Properties

Table 1: Fundamental Properties of Lead-Based and Lead-Free PQDs

Property	Lead-Based (CsPbX₃)	Lead-Free Cs₃Bi₂Br₉	Lead-Free Cs₃Sb₂Br₉
Crystal Structure	3D Cubic/Orthorhombic [22]	0D Layered (A₃B₂X₉) [68]	0D Layered (A₃B₂X₉) [69]
Bandgap Tunability	Full visible spectrum (410-700 nm) [22]	Limited by structure [70]	Tunable (370-560 nm) [69]
Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY)	Up to 95% (after passivation) [71]	Enhanced by hybrid passivation [70]	Up to 46% [69]
Emission Peak	Tunable [22]	Blue emission [70]	410 nm (Blue) [69]
FWHM	Narrow (12-40 nm) [68]	Broader than CsPbX₃ [68]	41 nm [69]
Primary Stability Challenges	Ligand detachment, phase transitions [22]	Lower PLQY, surface defects [70]	Aqueous instability [69]

Surface Chemistry and Defect Profiles

The surface chemistry of PQDs is governed by the dynamic binding of ligands and the formation of surface defects. For lead-based CsPbX₃, the dominant defects are lead and halide vacancies [22] [72]. Halide vacancies create shallow trap states, while lead vacancies are more detrimental, creating deep trap levels that act as strong non-radiative recombination centers [72]. The native ligands, typically oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OAm), bind dynamically to the surface but readily detach during purification or under environmental stress, exposing these defects and accelerating degradation [22].

Emerging lead-free PQDs, such as Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ and Cs₃Sb₂Br₉, possess different structural motifs. The A₃B₂X₉ structure features isolated [B₂X₉]³⁻ dimers or layers, leading to stronger quantum confinement but also a higher susceptibility to surface defects due to their reduced dimensionality [68]. Their defect tolerance is generally lower than that of CsPbX₃, and their surfaces require tailored ligand interactions to achieve competitive optoelectronic performance [70] [69].

Surface Modification Strategies

Surface modification strategies aim to passivate surface defects and enhance environmental stability without compromising optical efficiency.

Lead-Based (CsPbX₃) PQDs

• In Situ Ligand Engineering: Traditional long-chain ligands (OA/OAm) can be supplemented or replaced during synthesis. Multidentate ligands (e.g., dicarboxylic acids) chelate more strongly to Pb²⁺ sites on the surface, reducing ligand detachment and suppressing defect formation [22].
• Post-Synthesis Ligand Exchange: This approach replaces native ligands with more robust alternatives after PQD synthesis. Didodecyldimethylammonium bromide (DDAB) is a common ammonium salt that effectively passivates halide vacancies and enhances water resistance [70] [22].
• Spontaneous Surface Passivation: A remarkable, passive strategy involves long-term air exposure. Ambient moisture gradually reacts with the CsPbBr₃ surface over years, forming a protective shell of PbBr(OH) nano-phases. This shell mitigates surface defects and confines charge carriers, boosting PLQY from 20% to 93% over four years [71].
• Inorganic Shell Encapsulation: Coating PQDs with an inert inorganic matrix provides a robust physical barrier. SiO₂ is widely used, as it forms a dense, amorphous layer that protects PQDs from moisture and thermal stress while maintaining optical transparency [70] [73].

Lead-Free PQDs

• Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Coating: For lead-free systems like Cs₃Bi₂Br₉, a synergistic approach is highly effective. Surface defects are first passivated with organic ligands like DDAB. Subsequently, an inorganic SiO₂ coating is applied via hydrolysis of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), forming a core-shell structure that significantly enhances environmental stability for both electroluminescent and photovoltaic devices [70].
• Ligand-Assisted Reprecipitation (LARP): The modified LARP (m-LARP) method enables rapid synthesis of lead-free PQDs like Cs₃Sb₂Br₉ at room temperature. This method provides fine control over surface termination, and a Br-rich surface has been shown to reduce surface trap effects, contributing to high PLQY [69].

The following diagram illustrates the strategic decision-making process for selecting a surface modification pathway based on the PQD material system and desired application outcome.

Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Hybrid Organic-Inorganic Passivation for Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ PQDs

This protocol details the synthesis of lead-free Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ PQDs and their subsequent passivation with DDAB and SiO₂ for enhanced stability [70].

Research Reagent Solutions:

• Cesium Bromide (CsBr) & Bismuth Tribromide (BiBr₃): Precursors for the perovskite crystal structure.
• Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO): Solvent for the precursor solution.
• Oleic Acid (OA) & Oleylamine (OAm): Native ligands for initial surface stabilization during synthesis.
• Didodecyldimethylammonium Bromide (DDAB): Organic passivator to bind surface defects and improve PLQY.
• Tetraethyl Orthosilicate (TEOS): Precursor for the formation of the inorganic SiO₂ shell.

Procedure:

• Precursor Preparation: Dissolve CsBr (0.2 mmol, 0.0426 g) and BiBr₃ (0.2 mmol, 0.1078 g) in 10 mL of DMSO in a vial. Add 0.5 mL of OA and 0.5 mL of OAm to the solution. Stir vigorously until a transparent solution is obtained.
• Antisolvent Precipitation: Transfer 1 mL of the precursor solution into a centrifuge tube. Rapidly inject 5 mL of toluene (antisolvent) under stirring to instantaneously form a cloudy colloidal suspension of Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ PQDs.
• Purification: Centrifuge the suspension at 8000 rpm for 5 minutes. Discard the supernatant and re-disperse the PQD pellet in 5 mL of hexane.
• Organic Passivation: Add 10 mg of DDAB to the PQD hexane dispersion. Sonicate for 10 minutes and then stir for 1 hour at room temperature to allow DDAB ligands to bind to the PQD surface.
• Inorganic Shell Coating: Add 2.4 mL of TEOS to the dispersion. Stir for 30 minutes to allow for homogeneous mixing. Then, add 0.5 mL of deionized water to initiate the hydrolysis and condensation of TEOS, forming the SiO₂ shell. Continue stirring for 6 hours.
• Final Product Isolation: Centrifuge the Cs₃Bi₂Br₉/DDAB/SiO₂ PQDs at 8000 rpm for 5 minutes. Wash the pellet with ethanol once and finally re-disperse in 5 mL of cyclohexane for characterization and device fabrication.

Protocol 2: Spontaneous Air-Passivation of CsPbBr₃ PQD Glass

This protocol describes the fabrication of CsPbBr₃ PQDs embedded in a glass matrix and the subsequent spontaneous, water-assisted surface passivation that occurs over long-term air storage [71].

Research Reagent Solutions:

• Glass Network Formers (SiO₂, B₂O₃): Form the stable, amorphous glass matrix.
• Modifiers (ZnO, Na₂CO₃): Modify the melting temperature and physical properties of the glass.
• Perovskite Precursors (Cs₂CO₃, PbBr₂, NaBr): Source for Cs⁺, Pb²⁺, and Br⁻ ions to form CsPbBr₃ quantum dots within the glass.

Procedure:

• Glass Melting: Weigh and thoroughly mix raw materials according to the molar composition 80(SiO₂-B₂O₃-ZnO-Na₂CO₃)-20(Cs₂CO₃-PbBr₂-NaBr) in an agate mortar.
• Thermal Processing: Transfer the mixture to an alumina crucible and melt at 1100 °C for 10 minutes in air. Pour the melt onto a preheated copper mold and immediately transfer it to a muffle furnace annealed at 350 °C for 2 hours to relieve internal stress. Allow the glass to cool slowly to room temperature.
• PQD Precipitation: Heat the as-made bulk glass to 450 °C for 6 hours in a muffle furnace. This secondary heat treatment controls the nucleation and growth of CsPbBr₃ PQDs within the glass matrix.
• Passivation via Aging: Grind the glass into a fine powder and store it in ambient laboratory air (with inherent humidity) for an extended period (e.g., four years). The ambient moisture slowly interacts with the glass surface, triggering a hydrolysis reaction that leads to the gradual formation of a PbBr(OH) nano-phase passivation layer.

Application in Light-Emitting Diodes (LEDs)

The ultimate test for surface-modified PQDs is their integration into functional devices. The stability and high PLQY achieved through advanced surface chemistry directly translate to improved LED performance.

Table 2: Performance Metrics of Surface-Modified PQDs in Optoelectronic Applications

PQD System	Surface Modification	Key Outcome	Application Performance	Reference
CsPbBr₃ in Glass	4-year air exposure (PbBr(OH) layer)	PLQY increased from 20% to 93%	Enhanced stability for solid-state lighting	[71]
Cs₃Bi₂Br₉	DDAB & SiO₂ hybrid coating	Greatly enhanced environmental stability	Blue electroluminescence (485 nm); PCE of solar cell: 14.85%	[70]
CsPbX₃	Ligand Engineering (general)	High color purity (up to NTSC 144%)	Ideal for high-quality displays	[22]

For LED fabrication, PQDs are typically deposited as a thin film between charge transport layers. Surface ligands that enhance stability in solution must also facilitate efficient charge injection and transport within the solid-state device. Short-chain or conductive ligands are often employed post-passivation to address this challenge. The high color purity of CsPbX₃ PQDs, a result of their narrow emission bandwidth, enables a wide color gamut, a critical advantage for display applications [22]. The significantly improved operational stability of lead-free PQDs, as demonstrated by the Cs₃Bi₂Br₉/DDAB/SiO₂ system, marks a critical step toward commercially viable, environmentally friendly perovskite LEDs [70].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Reagents for PQD Surface Chemistry Research

Reagent	Function	Application Context
Oleic Acid (OA) / Oleylamine (OAm)	Native surface ligands for synthesis; passivate surface sites and control growth.	Standard for initial synthesis of both lead-based and lead-free PQDs. [70] [22]
Didodecyldimethylammonium Bromide (DDAB)	Organic ammonium salt; strongly passivates halide vacancies and improves PLQY.	Effective for both CsPbBr₃ [22] and Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ [70] PQDs.
Tetraethyl Orthosilicate (TEOS)	Precursor for forming a protective silicon dioxide (SiO₂) shell via sol-gel chemistry.	Used for inorganic encapsulation to enhance thermal and moisture stability. [70]
HX (X = Cl, Br, I)	Halide source for controlling the halide composition during synthesis.	Enables anion exchange for bandgap tuning in CsPbX₃ PQDs. [74]
Cs₂CO₃, PbBr₂, NaBr	Precursors for the cesium, lead, and bromide ions in CsPbBr₃ PQD glass.	Used in the melt-quenching synthesis of PQDs embedded in an inorganic glass matrix. [71]

Within the development of perovskite quantum dot (PQD)-based light-emitting diodes (PeLEDs), achieving high performance and long-term operational stability remains a paramount challenge. The intrinsic instability of perovskite materials—particularly their susceptibility to moisture, oxygen, and thermal stress—poses a significant barrier to commercialization [75]. This application note delineates and compares three core material engineering strategies employed to overcome these limitations: surface modification, compositional engineering, and dimensionality control. Each approach targets specific deficiencies in pristine perovskite materials, and their strategic integration is often key to fabricating robust, high-efficiency optoelectronic devices [76] [70]. The content herein is framed within a broader thesis on advancing surface modification techniques for PeLEDs, providing detailed protocols and comparative analysis for researchers and scientists in the field.

Comparative Analysis of Material Engineering Strategies

The table below summarizes the primary objectives, key methodologies, and resultant material properties for the three principal engineering strategies.

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Material Engineering Strategies for Perovskite Quantum Dots

Strategy	Primary Objective	Key Methodologies	Impact on Material Properties
Surface Modification	Enhance stability against environmental factors (moisture, oxygen) and passivate surface defects.	Organic ligand passivation (e.g., DDAB) [70]; Inorganic shell coating (e.g., SiO₂) [70]; Hybrid organic-inorganic coating [70].	Improved environmental stability [70]; Reduced non-radiative recombination [6]; Enhanced photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) [70] [6].
Compositional Engineering	Tune bandgap for target emission wavelength and improve intrinsic structural stability.	Anion exchange (e.g., Br/I ratio) [75]; Cation doping (e.g., Gu+, Cs+) [76] [75]; A-site mixing [75].	Precise bandgap tuning for color purity [75]; Increased thermal stability and reduced ion migration [76]; Phase stabilization [75].
Dimensionality Control	Combine high optoelectronic performance of 3D structures with superior stability of low-dimensional structures.	Incorporation of large organic cations (e.g., PEA+, BA+) to form 2D/3D heterostructures [76] [43]; Quantum confinement in 0D QDs [8].	Enhanced moisture resistance [76]; Energy funneling for efficient emission [43]; Suppression of ion migration [76].

Detailed Experimental Protocols

Surface Modification: Hybrid Organic-Inorganic Passivation of Lead-Free PQDs

This protocol details the synergistic defect passivation of Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ PQDs using didodecyldimethylammonium bromide (DDAB) and a SiO₂ coating, a strategy that significantly enhances environmental stability for flexible electroluminescence and photovoltaics [70].

Workflow: Hybrid Passivation of PQDs

Materials and Reagents

• Cesium Bromide (CsBr) and Bismuth Tribromide (BiBr₃): Precursors for lead-free perovskite core.
• Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO): Solvent for precursor preparation.
• Oleic Acid (OA) and Oleylamine (OAm): Standard capping ligands for initial PQD synthesis.
• Didodecyldimethylammonium Bromide (DDAB): Organic passivator for defect healing and chirality impartation [70] [6].
• Tetraethyl Orthosilicate (TEOS): Precursor for inorganic SiO₂ coating.
• Anhydrous Ethanol: Antisolvent for purification.

Step-by-Step Procedure

• Synthesis of Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ PQDs: Dissolve CsBr (0.2 mmol, 0.0426 g) and BiBr₃ (0.3 mmol, 0.132 g) in 10 mL DMSO with 0.5 mL OA and 0.5 mL OAm as ligands to form a transparent precursor solution. Rapidly inject 1 mL of this precursor into 20 mL of vigorously stirred anhydrous ethanol (antisolvent). Centrifuge the resulting suspension at 8000 rpm for 5 minutes to obtain the PQD precipitate [70].
• Organic Ligand Passivation with DDAB:
  • Re-disperse the pristine PQD precipitate in 10 mL of toluene.
  • Add varying mass concentrations of DDAB (e.g., 1 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg) to the PQD dispersion and stir for 1 hour at room temperature.
  • Critical Step: Subject the mixture to ultrasonic (US) treatment for 30 minutes. This enhances chiral ligand exchange efficiency by promoting the desorption of original OA/OAm ligands, leading to superior surface coverage, defect passivation, and spin selectivity [6].
• Inorganic SiO₂ Shell Coating:
  • To the DDAB-passivated PQD dispersion, add 2.4 mL of TEOS under continuous stirring.
  • Allow the hydrolysis of TEOS to proceed for 12-24 hours at room temperature to form a protective amorphous SiO₂ layer around each PQD, creating a core-shell structure [70].
• Purification and Isolation: Precipitate the final Cs₃Bi₂Br₉/DDAB/SiO₂ PQDs by adding hexane, followed by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 5 min. Re-disperse the final product in anhydrous toluene for subsequent device fabrication.

Validation and Characterization

• Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM): Confirm core-shell morphology and quantify particle size and shell uniformity. PQDs should maintain quasispherical morphology ~12 nm in diameter [70].
• Photoluminescence (PL) Spectroscopy: Measure PLQY and photoluminescence lifetime. Successful passivation manifests as a significant increase in PLQY and an extension of the average PL lifetime, indicating suppressed non-radiative recombination [70].
• Magnetic Conductive Probe Atomic Force Microscopy (mCP-AFM): Characterize spin selectivity (CISS effect). Calculate spin polarization efficiency (P); well-passivated PQDs with US treatment can exhibit P-values exceeding 85% at operational voltages [6].

Compositional Engineering: GuI Doping and 2D/3D Bilayer Formation

This protocol describes a two-step method to enhance the thermal and moisture stability of MAPbI₃ (MAPI) films through guanidinium iodide (GuI) doping and subsequent surface passivation with 5-aminovaleric acid iodide (5-AVAI) to form a 2D/3D heterostructure [76].

Workflow: 2D/3D Perovskite Formation

Materials and Reagents

• Lead Iodide (PbI₂), Methylammonium Iodide (MAI): Precursors for the base MAPI perovskite.
• Guanidinium Iodide (GuI): Dopant to enhance thermal stability and heal cation vacancies in the 3D lattice [76].
• 5-Aminovaleric Acid Iodide (5-AVAI): Large ammonium salt for surface passivation and inducing 2D perovskite formation at the interface [76].
• Dimethylformamide (DMF), Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO): Solvents for perovskite precursor solutions.

Step-by-Step Procedure

• Guanidinium-Doped 3D Perovskite (GUMAPI) Formation:
  • Prepare a precursor solution by dissolving PbI₂, MAI, and GuI (e.g., 1:1:0.1 molar ratio) in a mixture of DMF and DMSO.
  • Deposit the film via spin-coating (e.g., 4000 rpm for 30 s).
  • Anneal the film at 100°C for 60 minutes. GuI incorporation improves structural stability and raises the decomposition temperature [76].
• Surface Passivation and 2D Layer Formation:
  • Prepare a solution of 5-AVAI in isopropanol at a concentration of 1 mg/mL.
  • Spin-coat the 5-AVAI solution (e.g., 4000 rpm for 20 s) directly onto the annealed GUMAPI film.
  • Anneal the stack at 100°C for 10 minutes. The bifunctional 5-AVAI molecule reacts with the surface of the 3D perovskite, forming a thin, hydrophobic quasi-2D perovskite capping layer (2D/3D interface) [76].

Validation and Characterization

• Time-Dependent Water Contact Angle Measurements: The 2D-capped film (1AV) should show a higher contact angle than the control, indicating enhanced hydrophobicity and moisture resistance [76].
• In-situ Temperature-Dependent XRD: Analyze structural integrity upon heating. High-quality films should withstand temperatures >150 °C without phase degradation [76].
• Current-Voltage (J-V) Characteristics: In carbon-based PSCs (CPSCs), this 2D/3D structure can yield a champion power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 13.2% with a T80 lifetime of 93.2% without encapsulation [76].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 2: Key Reagent Solutions for Perovskite Surface and Composition Engineering

Reagent	Function	Application Context
Didodecyldimethylammonium Bromide (DDAB)	Organic surface passivator; passivates surface defects and imparts chirality/spin selectivity [70] [6].	Surface modification of PQDs for enhanced PLQY and stability in light-emitting layers [70].
Tetraethyl Orthosilicate (TEOS)	Precursor for inorganic SiO₂ coating; forms a dense, amorphous protective shell [70].	Creating a core-shell structure on PQDs for superior thermal and environmental stability [70].
Guanidinium Iodide (GuI)	Crystalline lattice dopant; improves thermal stability and heals A-site vacancies due to its high pKa [76].	Compositional engineering of 3D perovskite absorbers for solar cells and LEDs [76].
5-Aminovaleric Acid Iodide (5-AVAI)	Surface modifier and 2D perovskite former; creates a hydrophobic 2D capping layer on 3D perovskites [76].	Forming 2D/3D heterostructures for superior moisture stability and interface passivation [76].
R-/S-Methylbenzylamine (R-/S-MBA)	Chiral ligand; induces chirality and spin selectivity in PQDs via ligand exchange [6].	Fabricating spin-LEDs (CP-LEDs) for direct emission of circularly polarized light [6].

The strategic selection and implementation of surface modification, compositional engineering, and dimensionality control are critical for advancing PQD-based PeLEDs. Surface modification, particularly through hybrid organic-inorganic passivation, directly targets the primary degradation pathways at the particle surface, offering a robust method to enhance operational stability without compromising optoelectronic efficiency. For a comprehensive thesis, the protocols and data herein provide a foundational framework. Future work should focus on the intelligent integration of these strategies—for instance, employing compositionally tuned and dimensionally engineered perovskites that are subsequently encapsulated with advanced multifunctional ligands—to push the boundaries of performance and durability in next-generation optoelectronic devices.

The pursuit of high-performance perovskite quantum dot light-emitting diodes (PQD-LEDs) represents a central focus in next-generation display and lighting research. A significant barrier to commercialization has been the presence of surface and interfacial trap sites that cause non-radiative recombination and carrier loss, ultimately limiting the external quantum efficiency (EQE) [77]. This case study, framed within a broader thesis on surface modification for PQD-based light-emitting diodes, details a specific chemical passivation strategy that enables EQE to exceed 23% in both red and green-emitting devices [45] [77]. We provide a comprehensive quantitative summary and detailed experimental protocols to guide researchers in replicating and building upon these high-performance outcomes. The core innovation lies in employing a liquid bidentate ligand, Formamidine thiocyanate (FASCN), to achieve near-complete surface coverage and eliminate interfacial quenching centers, which is particularly impactful for near-infrared (NIR) and visible-range LEDs [77].

The following tables consolidate key performance metrics and material properties achieved through advanced passivation techniques, providing a benchmark for the field.

Table 1: Summary of Reported High-Efficiency PeLED Performance (2024)

Emission Color	Perovskite Dimension	Peak EQE (%)	Luminance (cd m⁻²)	Key Passivation/Structure Strategy	Citation
Green	0D (QD)	23.45	109,427	In-situ ligand compensation (ILC) & nucleophilic substitution	[45]
Green	1D (Quantum Wire)	26.09	N/R	Anti-solvent-free synthesis in porous alumina membranes	[45]
Green & Red	2D/3D Composite	>30	N/R	Dimensional engineering for exciton confinement	[45]
NIR (776 nm)	0D (QD)	~23	N/R	Bidentate liquid ligand (FASCN) treatment	[77]

Table 2: Enhanced Material Properties Post-FASCN Passivation

Property	Control (Oleate-capped)	FASCN-Treated	Measurement Technique	Implication for Device Performance
Binding Energy (Eᵦ)	-0.22 eV (OA) / -0.18 eV (OAm)	-0.91 eV	Density-functional theory (DFT)	Suppresses ligand desorption during processing [77]
Exciton Binding Energy	39.1 meV	76.3 meV	Temperature-dependent PL	Reduces exciton dissociation, favoring radiative recombination [77]
Film Conductivity	Base	8x higher	Two-terminal device measurement	Improves charge injection and reduces efficiency roll-off [77]
PL Quantum Yield (PLQY)	Significantly lower	Most notable improvement	Photoluminescence spectroscopy	Indicates effective passivation of non-radiative trap sites [77]
Thermal Stability (Δλ)	12 nm shift	1 nm shift	PL intensity vs. time @ 100°C	Superior stability for device operation and longevity [77]

Experimental Protocols

Core Protocol: FASCN Ligand Exchange Treatment

This protocol describes the surface treatment of FAPbI₃ PQDs using Formamidine thiocyanate (FASCN) to achieve high-coverage passivation, as utilized for achieving ~23% EQE in NIR-PQD-LEDs [77].

• Objective: To replace dynamic, long-chain oleate ligands with short, bidentate FASCN ligands, thereby passivating surface traps, suppressing ion migration, and increasing film conductivity.
• Materials:
  • FAPbI₃ QDs in non-polar solvent: Synthesized with standard oleic acid (OA) and oleylammonium (OAm) capping ligands.
  • Ligand Solution: FASCN dissolved in a suitable solvent (e.g., isopropanol or butanol). The liquid characteristic of FASCN avoids the need for high-polarity solvents that could damage the QDs [77].
  • Anti-solvent: Anhydrous hexane or toluene.
  • Centrifuge.
• Procedure:
  • Purification: The freshly synthesized FAPbI₃ QDs are precipitated and washed once with anti-solvent via centrifugation to remove excess precursors and loosely bound ligands.
  • Re-dispersion: The QD pellet is re-dispersed in a minimal volume of a non-polar solvent (e.g., octane) to create a concentrated stock solution.
  • Ligand Treatment: The QD stock solution is added dropwise to a vigorously stirring solution of FASCN in a polar solvent (e.g., 1 mg/mL in isopropanol). The mixture is stirred for 5-10 minutes.
  • Isolation: The treated QDs are precipitated by adding an anti-solvent and separated by centrifugation.
  • Washing: The pellet is washed once with a small volume of anti-solvent to remove any excess FASCN and reaction by-products.
  • Final Dispersion: The final QD pellet is dispersed in an anhydrous, non-polar solvent (e.g., octane) to the desired concentration for film deposition.

Device Fabrication and Characterization

• LED Fabrication:
  • Substrate Preparation: Patterned ITO/glass substrates are subjected to standard cleaning procedures (e.g., sonication in detergent, deionized water, acetone, and isopropanol) followed by oxygen plasma treatment.
  • Charge Transport Layers: Deposit the hole injection layer (e.g., PEDOT:PSS) and hole transport layer (e.g., Poly-TPD) onto the ITO substrate via spin-coating and annealing.
  • Emissive Layer Deposition: The passivated PQD ink is spin-coated onto the stack of charge transport layers in an inert atmosphere (e.g., nitrogen glovebox). Parameters like spin speed and acceleration are optimized for homogeneous, pinhole-free films.
  • Electrode Deposition: An electron transport layer (e.g., TPBi), followed by a low-work-function metal cathode (e.g., LiF/Al), is thermally evaporated onto the PQD film under high vacuum.
• Key Characterization Methods:
  • Time-Resolved Photoluminescence (TRPL): To measure carrier lifetime and quantify the reduction in non-radiative recombination pathways post-treatment. The FASCN-treated films show a prolonged lifetime [77].
  • Femtosecond Transient Absorption (TA) Spectroscopy: To investigate charge transfer and recombination dynamics. A faster decay of the ground-state bleaching signal in treated QDs indicates introduced energy carrier transfer pathways [77].
  • X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS): To confirm the successful binding of FASCN to the QD surface. A shift in the Pb 4f peak to higher binding energy is observed, indicating increased electron density around Pb²⁺ ions [77].
  • EQE Measurement: The external quantum efficiency of the fabricated LED is measured using an integrating sphere coupled to a calibrated spectrometer in the forward direction.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Materials for High-Efficiency PQD-LED Fabrication

Reagent/Material	Function/Role	Specific Example & Rationale
Bidentate Ligands	Surface passivation with high coverage and strong binding.	Formamidine thiocyanate (FASCN): Short carbon chain (<3) and bidentate coordination via S and N atoms provide 4x higher binding energy than oleates, preventing desorption [77].
Multifunctional Ligands	Passivation and improved charge transport.	2-Thiophenepropylamine bromide (ThPABr): Enhances PLQY up to 83% in CsPbBr₃ QDs and improves LED performance compared to conventional ligands [45].
Inorganic Hole Transport Layers	Improved hole injection and electron blocking.	Nickel Oxide (NiOₓ): Offers better stability and higher EQE (up to 14.6%) compared to organic PEDOT:PSS by reducing interfacial trap density [45].
Barrier/Passivation Layers	Device encapsulation and surface defect passivation.	Epitaxial AlN (e-AlN): A 1-nm-thick layer provides both chemical and field-effect passivation for µ-LEDs, significantly boosting EQE, especially in the challenging red spectrum [78].
Lead-Free Perovskite Precursors	Developing more environmentally friendly alternatives.	Manganese-based Perovskites: Can achieve high PLQY and red emission with long triplet lifetimes, offering a path toward non-toxic devices [45].

Workflow & Pathway Visualization

The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow from the fundamental problem in untreated PQDs to the implemented solution and its resulting effects on material properties and final device performance.

Diagram 1: Logical pathway from problem identification to high-efficiency outcome.

The mechanism of surface passivation can be understood as a transition from a defective, unstable state to a well-passivated, stable one. The following diagram details this atomic-scale process.

Diagram 2: Atomic-scale mechanism of FASCN passivation.

The operational lifetime of optoelectronic devices based on perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) remains a critical barrier to their commercialization. While PQDs exhibit exceptional optoelectronic properties—including high photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY), wide color tunability, and narrow emission bandwidth—their inherent ionic nature and dynamic surfaces create vulnerabilities to environmental stimuli and operational stresses [40]. The fundamental instability originates from two primary mechanisms: defect formation on the PQD surface due to ligand dissociation, and vacancy formation within the crystal lattice facilitated by low-energy halide migration [40]. These degradation pathways act as non-radiative recombination centers, quench luminescence, and ultimately cause device failure.

Surface manipulation has emerged as the most promising strategy to address these instability roots. By engineering the interface between the PQD core and its environment, researchers can passivate surface defects, suppress ion migration, and enhance the robustness of PQD thin films. This Application Note examines current surface treatment methodologies, their quantitative impact on device performance parameters, and provides detailed experimental protocols for implementing these stability-enhancing strategies.

Surface Instability Mechanisms in PQDs

Understanding the degradation mechanisms is prerequisite for developing effective surface treatments. The high surface-to-volume ratio of PQDs means a significant portion of atoms reside on the surface, making them particularly susceptible to surface-related degradation.

• Ligand Dissociation: Long-chain insulating ligands like oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OAm) used in synthesis have bent molecular structures that create steric hindrance, resulting in low packing density on PQD surfaces [40]. These ligands are only weakly bound and readily detach during purification processes or under operational stresses (heat, light, electric fields), leaving unpassivated surface atoms that become defect sites [40].

• Halide Ion Migration: The low formation energy of halide vacancies facilitates ion migration within the PQD lattice under applied electric fields [40]. This migration leads to phase segregation, non-radiative recombination, and ultimately degradation of the active material. The problem is particularly acute in mixed-halide compositions used for precise color tuning.

Table 1: Primary Degradation Mechanisms in PQDs and Their Consequences

Mechanism	Origin	Impact on Device
Ligand Dissorption	Weak van der Waals binding of long-chain ligands [40]	Increased surface defects, reduced PLQY, aggregation of PQDs
Halide Vacancy Formation	Low migration energy of halide ions [40]	Phase segregation, ion migration, non-radiative recombination
Surface Defect Formation	Uncoordinated lead (Pb²⁺) sites [77]	Trap-assisted recombination, carrier loss, efficiency droop
Interfacial Quenching	Ligand migration to interface sites during film formation [77]	Reduced charge injection, increased turn-on voltage, efficiency loss

Surface Treatment Strategies and Quantitative Outcomes

Ligand Engineering Approaches

Ligand exchange strategies replace weakly-bound long-chain ligands with more tightly-binding alternatives that offer improved surface coverage and passivation.

• Short-Chain Bidentate Ligands: Formamidine thiocyanate (FASCN), a bidentate liquid agent, demonstrates fourfold higher binding energy (−0.91 eV) compared to conventional oleate ligands (−0.22 eV) [77]. This tight binding suppresses ligand desorption during film preparation, enabling eightfold higher conductivity (3.95 × 10⁻⁷ S m⁻¹) and dramatically improved thermal stability (Δλ = 1 nm vs. 12 nm shift in control films after heating) [77].

• Thiol-Based Ligands: 2-aminoethanethiol (AET) exhibits strong affinity for Pb²⁺ sites, forming a dense passivation layer that maintains >95% of initial PL intensity after 60 minutes of water exposure or 120 minutes of UV exposure [40]. AET treatment enhances PLQY from 22% to 51% by effectively healing surface defects generated during purification [40].

Cross-Linking and Composite Strategies

Creating interconnected ligand matrices or incorporating PQDs into stabilizing composites provides physical barriers against environmental degradation.

• Cross-Linkable Ligands: Ligands with cross-linkable functional groups form robust networks between adjacent PQDs, inhibiting ligand dissociation through covalent bonding [40]. This approach significantly improves mechanical integrity in flexible PeLED applications.

• Polymer Matrices: Encapsulating PQDs within polymer composites physically isolates them from moisture and oxygen while suppressing ion migration through confinement effects. This strategy is particularly effective for flexible PeLEDs requiring enhanced mechanical durability [8].

Table 2: Performance Outcomes of Surface Treatment Strategies

Treatment Strategy	PLQY Improvement	Stability Enhancement	Device Performance
FASCN Bidentate Ligand	Significant increase (data not shown) [77]	No emission shift after heating (Δλ = 1 nm) [77]	23% EQE in NIR-LEDs [77]
AET Thiol Ligand	22% → 51% [40]	>95% PL retention after 60 min water exposure [40]	Improved photodetector performance [40]
Ligand Cross-Linking	Not specified	Maintained luminance after 5000 bending cycles [8]	Enhanced flexible device durability [8]
Core-Shell Structures	Not specified	Improved resistance to moisture/oxygen [40]	Extended operational lifetime [40]

Experimental Protocols

Protocol: Bidentate Ligand Exchange with FASCN

This protocol describes the treatment of FAPbI₃ PQDs with formamidine thiocyanate (FASCN) to achieve full surface coverage and suppressed ligand loss, adapted from published methodology [77].

Research Reagent Solutions:

• FAPbI₃ PQDs: Synthesized via hot-injection or LARP method with oleic acid/oleylamine capping ligands
• FASCN Solution: 10 mg/mL in anhydrous toluene
• Anhydrous Toluene: Solvent for ligand exchange
• Methyl Acetate: Anti-solvent for purification

Procedure:

• PQD Film Preparation: Spin-coat pristine FAPbI₃ PQD solution onto substrate at 2000 rpm for 30 seconds to form thin film.
• FASCN Treatment: Immediately after film formation, dynamically spin-coat FASCN solution (50 μL) at 3000 rpm for 30 seconds.
• Annealing: Thermally anneal treated film at 70°C for 5 minutes on hotplate.
• Washing: Rinse film gently with methyl acetate (300 μL) while spinning to remove excess ligands and reaction byproducts.
• Drying: Purge film with nitrogen flow and dry at 70°C for 1 minute.

Validation Metrics:

• XPS analysis showing Pb 4f peak shift to higher binding energy [77]
• TRPL showing prolonged lifetime indicating reduced trap states [77]
• PLQY increase confirming effective passivation [77]

Protocol: Thiol-Based Ligand Exchange with AET

This protocol details the post-synthesis treatment of CsPbI₃ PQDs with 2-aminoethanethiol (AET) to heal surface defects generated during purification [40].

Research Reagent Solutions:

• CsPbI₃ PQDs: Colloidal solution in hexane or toluene
• AET Solution: 0.1 M in anhydrous ethanol
• Anhydrous Ethanol: Polar solvent for ligand exchange
• Hexane: Non-polar solvent for purification

Procedure:

• PQD Purification: Precipitate pristine CsPbI₃ PQDs by adding methyl acetate (2:1 v/v to PQD solution), centrifuge at 8000 rpm for 5 minutes.
• Redispersion: Redisperse PQD pellet in 1 mL anhydrous ethanol.
• Ligand Exchange: Add AET solution (100 μL, 0.1 M) to PQD suspension and stir vigorously for 10 minutes at room temperature.
• Purification: Precipitate AET-treated PQDs by adding hexane (2:1 v/v), centrifuge at 8000 rpm for 5 minutes.
• Final Dispersion: Redisperse purified PQDs in anhydrous toluene for film formation.

Validation Metrics:

• PLQY measurement showing increase from ~22% to >50% [40]
• Maintenance of cubic phase after water/UV exposure confirmed by XRD [40]
• FTIR spectroscopy showing successful ligand exchange [40]

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for PQD Surface Treatments

Reagent	Function	Application Note
Formamidine Thiocyanate (FASCN)	Bidentate ligand with tight binding to Pb²⁺ sites [77]	Liquid agent with short carbon chain (<3) enables high conductivity; fourfold higher binding energy than oleate ligands [77]
2-Aminoethanethiol (AET)	Thiol-based ligand with strong affinity for Pb²⁺ [40]	Forms dense passivation layer; improves PLQY from 22% to 51%; enhances environmental stability [40]
Oleic Acid (OA)	Long-chain native ligand for PQD synthesis [79] [40]	Carboxylate group (R-COO⁻) binds to surface; provides steric stabilization but exhibits weak binding and insulating properties [79]
Oleylamine (OAm)	Long-chain native ligand for PQD synthesis [79] [40]	Ammonium group (R-NH₃⁺) replaces surface A-site cations; contributes to low ligand packing density [79]
Methyl Acetate	Anti-solvent for purification [40] [77]	Polar solvent for precipitating PQDs and removing excess ligands; can cause ligand detachment if used excessively [40]

Surface treatment strategies represent the most direct and effective approach to addressing the fundamental instability issues that plague PQD-based optoelectronic devices. Through ligand engineering, cross-linking, and composite formation, researchers have demonstrated remarkable improvements in both operational lifetime and device performance. The development of tight-binding bidentate ligands like FASCN shows particular promise, offering unprecedented binding energy and surface coverage that suppresses the primary degradation mechanisms.

As the field progresses, the integration of multiple stabilization strategies—combining ligand exchange with cross-linking and encapsulation—will likely yield further enhancements. Additionally, the development of standardized stability testing protocols will enable more direct comparison between different treatment methodologies. With continued refinement of these surface manipulation techniques, the path toward commercially viable, long-lasting PeLEDs becomes increasingly clear, potentially unlocking a new generation of high-performance, flexible display and lighting technologies.

Comparative Advantages of PQD-LEDs Over OLEDs and Traditional QLEDs in Display Applications

The landscape of display technologies is dominated by two primary approaches: the emissive technology of Organic Light-Emitting Diodes (OLEDs) and the transmissive, backlit technology of Quantum Dot LEDs (QLEDs) [80] [81]. OLEDs are characterized by their self-emissive pixels, which can be switched off individually to achieve perfect blacks and infinite contrast [80] [82]. Traditional QLEDs are fundamentally LCD TVs that utilize a quantum dot film to enhance color and brightness from a separate LED backlight [80] [81].

A emerging contender, Perovskite Quantum Dot LEDs (PQD-LEDs), leverages the exceptional optoelectronic properties of perovskite nanocrystals [5] [14]. This application note details the comparative advantages of PQD-LEDs, framing them within the context of advanced surface modification research for next-generation displays.

Fundamental Comparative Analysis

The core advantages of PQD-LEDs stem from the intrinsic properties of perovskite quantum dots and the effectiveness of surface ligand engineering in optimizing these properties.

Key Property Comparison

Table 1: Comparative analysis of core display technologies based on material properties and performance.

Property	OLED	Traditional QLED	PQD-LED
Emissive Nature	Emissive (Pixel-level) [81]	Transmissive (Backlit) [81]	Emissive (Potential) / Transmissive (Current) [14]
Black Level/Contrast	Perfect blacks, Infinite contrast [82]	Good (limited by backlight) [82]	High potential for emissive displays [14]
Color Purity & Gamut	Excellent, wide gamut [81]	Excellent, vibrant colors [83]	Superior, tunable via quantum confinement [5] [14]
Peak Brightness	Good, improving [80]	Excellent [81] [82]	Very High potential [14]
Material Stability	Organic material degradation risk [82]	High inorganic stability [84]	Moderate; enhanced via surface passivation [5] [14]
Manufacturing	Complex, costly [82]	Mature, cost-effective [82]	Solution-processable, potentially lower cost [5]

Quantitative Performance Metrics

Table 2: Experimental quantitative data from recent PQD-LED research, highlighting the impact of surface modification.

Parameter	Baseline CsPbI₃ PQDs	With TOPO Ligand Passivation	With L-PHE Ligand Passivation	Reference Application
Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY)	Baseline	18% enhancement [5]	3% enhancement [5]	LED Efficiency [14]
Emission Linewidth (FWHM)	~24-28 nm [5]	Narrowed	Narrowed	High Color Purity [14]
Operational Stability	Highly susceptible to degradation [5]	Improved	Retained >70% PL after 20 days UV [5]	Device Longevity [5]
External Quantum Efficiency (EQE)	N/A	N/A	>26% achieved in pure red LEDs [14]	High-Efficiency Devices [14]

Experimental Protocols for PQD-LED Development

The following protocols are central to synthesizing high-performance PQDs for display applications, with a focus on surface ligand engineering.

Protocol: Synthesis of CsPbI₃ PQDs via Hot-Injection

Objective: To synthesize high-quality, red-emitting CsPbI₃ PQDs with controlled size and narrow emission profile [5].

Materials:

• Precursors: Cesium carbonate (Cs₂CO₃, 99%), Lead(II) iodide (PbI₂, 99%)
• Solvents: 1-Octadecene (ODE, 90%), Oleic Acid (OA, 90%), Oleylamine (OAm, 90%)
• Ligands: Trioctylphosphine (TOP, 99%), Trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO, 99%), L-Phenylalanine (L-PHE, 98%)

Procedure:

• Cesium Oleate Preparation: Load 0.2 mmol Cs₂CO₃, 1.5 mL ODE, and 1.0 mL OA into a 50 mL flask. Heat to 120°C under N₂ atmosphere with vigorous stirring until the Cs₂CO₃ is fully dissolved. Maintain at 100°C until injection.
• Lead Precursor Preparation: In a separate 100 mL flask, load 0.4 mmol PbI₂, 10 mL ODE, 1.0 mL OA, and 1.0 mL OAm. Heat the mixture to 170°C under N₂ with stirring until a clear solution is obtained.
• Hot-Injection Reaction: Once the lead precursor solution is clear and stable at the optimal synthesis temperature of 170°C [5], swiftly inject 1.5 mL of the preheated Cs-oleate solution.
• Reaction Quenching: After a reaction duration of 10 seconds, cool the flask immediately using an ice-water bath to terminate crystal growth.
• Purification: Centrifuge the crude solution at 12,000 rpm for 10 minutes. Discard the supernatant and re-disperse the PQD pellet in a non-polar solvent (e.g., hexane or toluene) for further processing and ligand exchange.

Protocol: Surface Ligand Modification for Enhanced Performance

Objective: To passivate surface defects and enhance the photoluminescence and stability of synthesized CsPbI₃ PQDs [5].

Procedure:

• Ligand Solution Preparation: Prepare separate 10 mM solutions of the ligand modifiers (TOP, TOPO, or L-PHE) in a suitable solvent like hexane.
• Ligand Exchange: Add the ligand solution to the purified PQD dispersion (from Step 3.1) at a 1:1 volume ratio. Stir the mixture at 60°C for 2 hours.
• Purification & Collection: Precipitate the surface-modified PQDs by adding an anti-solvent (e.g., ethyl acetate) and centrifuging at 12,000 rpm for 10 minutes. Re-disperse the final PQD product in toluene for characterization and device fabrication.
• Characterization: Perform UV-Vis and PL spectroscopy to determine the optical properties. Compare the PLQY and stability of the ligand-modified PQDs against the baseline.

Visualizing Technological Pathways and Workflows

Technology Differentiation Pathway

(Diagram 1: Taxonomy of display technologies, highlighting the foundational role of surface engineering for PQD-LEDs.)

Experimental Workflow for PQD Optimization

(Diagram 2: Key steps and critical parameters in the synthesis and optimization of high-performance PQDs.)

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key reagents and materials for PQD-LED research, with a focus on surface and ligand engineering.

Reagent/Material	Function in PQD Research	Experimental Note
Cesium Carbonate (Cs₂CO₃)	Cesium precursor for forming the perovskite crystal structure [5]	Reacts with OA to form Cs-oleate for the hot-injection reaction.
Lead Iodide (PbI₂)	Lead and halide source for CsPbI₃ PQD synthesis [5]	High purity (≥99%) is critical to minimize defects and non-radiative recombination.
Trioctylphosphine Oxide (TOPO)	Lewis base ligand for surface passivation [5]	Coordinates with undercoordinated Pb²⁺ ions. Shows ~18% PL enhancement [5].
Trioctylphosphine (TOP)	Lewis base ligand and surface passivator [5]	Also acts as a size-enlargement agent during synthesis. Shows ~16% PL enhancement [5].
L-Phenylalanine (L-PHE)	Bidentate ligand for surface defect suppression [5]	Demonstrates superior photostability (>70% PL retention after 20 days UV) [5].
Oleic Acid (OA) / Oleylamine (OAm)	Primary capping ligands during synthesis [5]	Control crystal growth and provide initial colloidal stability. Often replaced via ligand exchange.

Conclusion

Surface modification has unequivocally emerged as a cornerstone strategy for unlocking the full potential of perovskite quantum dots in light-emitting diodes. By systematically addressing surface defects and enhancing lattice stability through advanced ligand engineering and passivation techniques, researchers have achieved remarkable improvements in device efficiency, color purity, and operational stability. The progression from foundational understanding to sophisticated bilateral passivation and pseudohalide incorporation demonstrates a maturing field capable of tackling its most persistent challenges, particularly for the demanding blue emission spectrum. Future directions must focus on developing more robust, scalable, and environmentally benign surface treatments, accelerating the integration of lead-free alternatives, and bridging the gap between laboratory-scale innovation and the stringent requirements of commercial display and lighting manufacturing. The continued convergence of precise synthetic control with deep mechanistic insight will undoubtedly propel PQD-LEDs toward widespread commercialization and new application frontiers.

References

• 1. The Perfect Imperfections of Perovskite Oxide Catalysts in the ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11935070/]
• 2. perspectives and challenges of solution-processed perovskite ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/sc/d5sc05266a]
• 3. Intrinsic point defects in halide double perovskite ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040609021002649]
• 4. Experimental evidence for defect tolerance in Pb-halide ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11067022/]
• 5. Effect of Surface Ligand Modification on the Optical ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2468023025023211]
• 6. Perovskite spin light-emitting diodes with simultaneously ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-57472-8]
• 7. Halide Perovskite Nanostructures: Processing Methods ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s44310-025-00090-5]
• 8. Flexible perovskite light-emitting diodes: recent progress ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41528-025-00408-5]
• 9. Micro-light-emitting diodes with quantum dots in display ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7214519/]
• 10. Optoelectronic system and device integration for quantum ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31853-9]
• 11. Nanosecond response perovskite quantum dot light ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41377-025-01959-y]
• 12. - Non Carrier Radiative Enhanced by Two-Level... Recombination [https://www.nature.com/articles/srep21712?error=cookies_not_supported&code=e2fbdabc-766e-4c3a-aed6-63eb1d389156]
• 13. | Semiconductor Physics Class Notes | Fiveable Surface recombination [https://fiveable.me/physics-models-semiconductor-devices/unit-4/surface-recombination/study-guide/HjwT1jzgrnZZZEqo]
• 14. Advances in Perovskite Quantum Dot Optoelectronics [https://insights.pluto.im/advances-in-perovskite-quantum-dot-optoelectronics-towards-high-performance-leds-and-solar-cells/]
• 15. Deep Eutectic Solvent-Mediated Ligand Engineering for ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123025028142]
• 16. Enhanced Stability and Luminescence Efficiency of CsPbBr3 PQDs via... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40197767/]
• 17. Stabilized Perovskite Quantum Dot Solids via Nonpolar ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10427392/]
• 18. Multifaceted anchoring ligands for uniform orientation and ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1385894724058017]
• 19. Enhanced coordination interaction with multi-site binding ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-61563-x]
• 20. Ligand-Assisted Purification of Mixed-Halide Perovskite ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12608481/]
• 21. Liquid bidentate ligand for full ligand coverage towards ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41377-024-01704-x]
• 22. Ligand Engineering of Inorganic Lead Halide Perovskite ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11280295/]
• 23. A quantitative model for charge carrier transport, trapping ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms7180]
• 24. A bilateral interfacial passivation ... | Nature Communications strategy [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-17633-3?error=cookies_not_supported&code=f2d64452-266e-4948-b353-528bc40574b6]
• 25. All polymer ligand enables highly stable spectra-pure... strategy [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40854954/]
• 26. Tailoring solvent-mediated ligand exchange for CsPbI3 ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542435122002343]
• 27. Suppression of halogen migration and defect passivation ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1385894725108413]
• 28. Exploring pseudohalide substitution in α-cobalt-based ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/dt/d5dt00273g]
• 29. Exploring pseudohalide substitution in α-cobalt-based layered ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11949197/]
• 30. Trinuclear copper(I)-halide/pseudohalide complexes ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277538725001317]
• 31. Pseudohalide Anions Driven Structural Modulation in Distorted ... [https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ACIE...64E9333Z/abstract]
• 32. Controlling Surface Energy of CsPbBr 3 QDs via Ligand ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0927775725017376]
• 33. Luminescent perovskite quantum dots: Progress in ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022231324004708]
• 34. Advances in Quantum-Dot-Based Displays [https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/10/7/1327]
• 35. Full-color micro-LED display with photo-patternable and ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-31945-6]
• 36. Ultralow trap density FAPbBr3 perovskite films for efficient ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-56557-8]
• 37. A novel double surface modulation strategy for the ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925838825063273]
• 38. In Situ Formation of Zwitterionic Ligands [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9185741/]
• 39. In Situ Iodide Passivation Toward Efficient CsPbI 3 ... [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40820-023-01134-1]
• 40. How to improve the structural stabilities of halide perovskite ... [https://nanoconvergencejournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40580-024-00412-x]
• 41. Improvement of the perovskite photodiodes performance ... [https://www.light-am.com/article/doi/10.37188/lam.2025.024]
• 42. Multifunctional Colloidal Quantum Dots-Based Light ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12472826/]
• 43. Review Multi-color perovskite light-emitting diode via ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590238525004606]
• 44. Advantageous properties of halide perovskite quantum ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468025723000559]
• 45. Perovskite-based dimensional integrations pushing LED ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2542529324001664]
• 46. All–Inorganic Perovskite Quantum Dot–Based Blue Light ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9781770/]
• 47. Perovskite LED - Page 2 [https://www.perovskite-info.com/perovskite-led?page=1]
• 48. Challenges and Opportunities for the Blue Perovskite ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/12/7/929]
• 49. 一种改性多孔二氧化硅防潮增透涂层的制备方法 [https://patents.google.com/patent/CN109592908A/zh]
• 50. How to improve the structural stabilities of halide perovskite ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10821855/]
• 51. Near unity quantum yield of strongly-confined blue-emitting ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925838825032347]
• 52. Fostering the Dense Packing of Halide Perovskite ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10604077/]
• 53. Perovskite Light-Emitting Devices with Doped Hole ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/26/6/1670]
• 54. Cascade surface modification of colloidal quantum dot inks ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-13437-2]
• 55. Photo-induced surface modification to improve the ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0021979718302972]
• 56. Review of blue perovskite light emitting diodes with ... [https://www.oejournal.org/article/doi/10.29026/oea.2021.200019]
• 57. Enhanced Emission Efficiency and Stability of Blue ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41032863/]
• 58. Stable and efficient blue quasi-2D perovskite light-emitting ... [https://www.sciopen.com/article/10.26599/NR.2025.94907429]
• 59. Exceptionally high brightness and long lifetime of efficient ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41377-025-01817-x]
• 60. High-Reliability Perovskite Quantum Dots Using Atomic ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9736641/]
• 61. Reproducibility of methods required to identify and ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452074822000325]
• 62. Morphological analysis of FDM parts subjected to surface ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-21288-9]
• 63. Surface Modification to Improve Properties of Materials - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6384733/]
• 64. Surface Prep Standards - A Quick Summary [https://blogs.ampp.org/protectperform/surface-prep-standards-a-quick-summary]
• 65. Nanomaterial surface modification toolkit: Principles, ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001868623002026]
• 66. Advances in Solution-Processed Blue Quantum Dot Light ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10222311/]
• 67. Micro-light-emitting diodes with quantum dots in display ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41377-020-0268-1]
• 68. Pioneering perovskite quantum dot nanosensors for heavy ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/ra/d5ra06200d?page=search]
• 69. (PDF) High Quantum Yield Blue Emission from Lead - Free Inorganic... [https://www.academia.edu/119981939/High_Quantum_Yield_Blue_Emission_from_Lead_Free_Inorganic_Antimony_Halide_Perovskite_Colloidal_Quantum_Dots]
• 70. Synergistic defect passivation in lead-free perovskite ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1010603025006598]
• 71. Four years of air exposure: Passive surface chemical ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1385894725053513]
• 72. Surface engineering in CsPbX3 quantum dots [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/qm/d3qm00911d]
• 73. Research progress on surface modifications for phosphors ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2023/cp/d3cp01658g]
• 74. Near-infrared-triggered photon upconversion... | Nature Communications [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-05947-2?error=cookies_not_supported]
• 75. Band gap tuning of perovskite solar cells for enhancing the ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11097048/]
• 76. Compositional engineering and surface passivation for ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378775323000204]
• 77. Liquid bidentate ligand for full ligand coverage towards ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11704330/]
• 78. 1-nm-thick epitaxial AlN passivation for highly efficient ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-60886-z]
• 79. Surface manipulation and engineering strategies for high ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1385894724071651]
• 80. QLED vs. OLED (and QD-OLED): Which TV Tech Is Right ... [https://www.consumerreports.org/electronics-computers/tvs/qled-vs-oled-and-qd-oled-which-tv-tech-is-right-for-you-a6691090566/]
• 81. QLED vs. OLED: What's Better? [https://www.cnet.com/tech/home-entertainment/qled-vs-oled-whats-better/]
• 82. OLED Vs. QLED Vs. LED: Which TV Is Right For You? [https://marketingbox.in/oled-qled-led-which-is-good-tv-buying-guide/]
• 83. QLED vs LED: the two TV panel technologies compared [https://www.whathifi.com/advice/qled-vs-led-which-tv-panel-technology-is-better]
• 84. LED vs QLED vs OLED: Key Differences & Buying Guide [https://www.vijaysales.com/blog-listing/led-vs-qled-vs-oled-key-differences-buying-guide]