Surface Ligand Engineering in Perovskite Quantum Dots: A Comprehensive Guide for Enhanced Optoelectronic Performance

Abstract

This article provides a thorough analysis of surface ligand engineering for perovskite quantum dots (PQDs), a critical factor determining the performance and stability of next-generation optoelectronic devices. Tailored for researchers and scientists, the content explores the foundational role of ligands in stabilizing colloidal integrity and passivating surface defects. It systematically reviews advanced methodological strategies, including in-situ and post-synthesis ligand exchange, and delves into troubleshooting common instability issues such as thermal degradation and photoluminescence blinking. By presenting a comparative validation of ligand effects across different PQD compositions and applications in photovoltaics and light-emitting diodes, this guide serves as a strategic resource for optimizing PQD-based devices and informs future material design principles for enhanced efficiency and commercial viability.

The Fundamental Role of Surface Ligands in Perovskite Quantum Dot Stability and Optoelectronics

Metal halide perovskite quantum dots (QDs) and nanocrystals (NCs) have emerged as leading materials for next-generation optoelectronic devices due to their exceptional properties, including high absorption coefficients, tunable bandgaps, and outstanding photoluminescence quantum yields (PLQYs) [1] [2]. The optical performance of these nanomaterials is intrinsically governed by their surface chemistry, where organic ligands play a dual role in both protection and restriction [3]. Ligands serve as primary passivators to reduce surface defects, thereby improving PLQYs and stability of QDs. However, they can also impose limitations due to poor electrical conductivity from long alkyl chains and dynamic binding characteristics that lead to surface defect formation during processing [3] [4].

The high surface-to-volume ratio of perovskite QDs makes them particularly vulnerable to surface defects. Undercoordinated atoms on the surface lead to the formation of a high density of defects, which create deep traps within the bandgap and consequently reduce quantum efficiency [5]. These defects act as non-radiative recombination centers, diminishing PLQY and impairing device performance in light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and other optoelectronic applications [6] [1]. Ligand engineering has consequently emerged as a critical strategy for comprehensive surface passivation, addressing crystal strain, electrical insulation, and defect formation simultaneously [4].

This review systematically compares recent advances in ligand design strategies, focusing on their efficacy in defect passivation and PLQY enhancement. By examining quantitative performance data across different ligand architectures and their underlying mechanisms, we provide researchers with a structured framework for selecting and designing optimal ligand systems for perovskite QD applications.

Ligand Design Strategies and Performance Comparison

Multidentate Binding and Lattice-Matched Anchors

Table 1: Performance Comparison of Advanced Ligand Architectures

Ligand Type	Binding Motif	Material System	PLQY (%)	EQE (%)	Key Advantages
TMeOPPO-p [3]	Multi-site phosphine oxide	CsPbI₃ QDs	97	27.0	Lattice-matched spacing (6.5 Å), multi-site anchoring
Acetate/2-HA [7]	Short-branched-chain	CsPbBr₃ QDs	99	-	Enhanced precursor purity, suppressed Auger recombination
AmdBr-C2Ph [4]	Amidinium bromide	FAPbBr₃ NCs	>90	17.6	Multiple hydrogen bonding, halogen defect compensation
Cinnamate [8]	Carboxylate π-conjugated	CsPbBr₃ QDs	-	-	Extended wavefunctions, enhanced interdot coupling
Bidentate ligands [5]	Two-point binding	Perovskite NPLs	-	-	Enhanced stability, reduced trap states

Conformal lattice matching represents a significant advancement in ligand design. The tris(4-methoxyphenyl)phosphine oxide (TMeOPPO-p) molecule demonstrates the principle of multi-site anchoring, where the interatomic distance of oxygen atoms (6.5 Å) precisely matches the lattice spacing of perovskite QDs [3]. This geometric compatibility enables strong interactions with uncoordinated Pb²⁺ ions, effectively eliminating trap states associated with halide vacancies. Density of states calculations confirm that this multi-site anchoring connects trap states with the conduction band minimum, facilitating complete defect passivation [3]. The resulting QDs achieve near-unity PLQY (97%) and enable LEDs with exceptional external quantum efficiency (EQE, 27%) and operational stability exceeding 23,000 hours [3].

Short-branched-chain ligands like 2-hexyldecanoic acid (2-HA) combined with acetate anions demonstrate another effective strategy. The acetate improves cesium precursor purity from 70.26% to 98.59%, while 2-HA exhibits stronger binding affinity toward QDs compared to conventional oleic acid [7]. This dual approach passivates surface defects and suppresses biexciton Auger recombination, achieving PLQYs of 99% and reducing amplified spontaneous emission threshold by 70% from 1.8 μJ·cm⁻² to 0.54 μJ·cm⁻² [7].

Ligand Electronic Structure Engineering

Table 2: Ligand Electronic Properties and Their Impact on Perovskite QDs

Ligand Property	Electronic Effect	Consequence on QD Properties	Experimental Evidence
Extended π-conjugation [8]	Lowers ligand excitation energies	Brings ligand energy levels closer to QD band edges	Enhanced interdot coupling, extended wavefunctions
Electron-withdrawing groups [8]	Lowers unoccupied orbital energies	Positions states near conduction band	Can create charge transfer pathways
Electron-donating groups [8]	Raises ligand energy levels	Increases HOMO-LUMO gap	Reduced midgap states
Carboxylate binding [8]	Electronegative oxygen atoms	Stronger binding than ammonium groups	Preferential bidentate coordination
Ammonium binding [8]	More positive binding group	Weaker binding affinity	Dynamic binding, easier desorption

Computational studies reveal that judicious ligand design can strategically modify the electronic properties of lead halide perovskites [8]. The extent of π-electron conjugation in ligand structures significantly influences their orbital energies relative to the perovskite band edges. Larger π-conjugated systems lower ligand excitation energies and bring unoccupied energy levels closer to the QD conduction band edge, sometimes even creating states inside the bandgap [8]. Electronic properties can be further tuned through substituents attached to the π-system, with electron-withdrawing groups lowering orbital energies and electron-donating groups raising them.

The binding group chemistry fundamentally influences passivation efficacy. Carboxylate groups, with their electronegative oxygen atoms, provide stronger binding to perovskite surfaces compared to ammonium groups [8]. This stronger binding is attributed to bidentate coordination modes and more favorable orbital overlap with undercoordinated surface sites. However, improper ligand selection can introduce midgap states that permanently trap charge carriers and quench QD emission, highlighting the importance of computational screening in ligand design [8].

Experimental Protocols and Methodologies

Synthesis and Purification Procedures

Hot-Injection Method for CsPbI₃ QDs with Lattice-Matched Anchors [3]: The synthesis begins with preparing cesium oleate by reacting Cs₂CO₃ with oleic acid in octadecene at 150°C under nitrogen atmosphere. Simultaneously, a lead precursor solution is prepared by dissolving PbI₂ in octadecene with oleic acid and oleylamine. The cesium oleate solution is rapidly injected into the lead precursor at 170°C, initiating immediate nucleation. After 5-10 seconds, the reaction mixture is cooled using an ice bath. For TMeOPPO-p treatment, the perovskite QDs are precipitated using methyl acetate, then redispersed in toluene containing TMeOPPO-p (molar ratio 1:5 relative to Pb). The mixture is stirred for 30 minutes to ensure complete ligand exchange. Finally, the passivated QDs are purified through centrifugation and redispersed in non-polar solvents for further characterization.

Two-Step ZnSe Shelling for InP QDs [6]: The core-shell synthesis begins with commercial InP core QDs (emission at 570 nm). For the 2-step shelling process, Zn(OA)₂ and a small amount of Se precursor (0.4 mmol) are sequentially injected into a reactor containing trioctylamine solvent and InP cores. Hydrofluoric acid (0.1 mL) is added to passivate the InP core surface by removing surface oxides. The mixture is heated to 220°C and maintained for 30 minutes under nitrogen, forming a thin Se interfacial layer. Subsequently, an additional 1.0 mmol of Se precursor is injected to initiate ZnSe shell growth. For comparison, the 1-step method injects the total 1.4 mmol Se precursor at once without the intermediate low-temperature step. Both approaches then undergo identical ZnS outer shell growth with S precursor injections at 320°C and 280°C.

Characterization Techniques for Evaluating Passivation Efficacy

• Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY) Measurement: Absolute PLQY is determined using an integrating sphere spectrometer with excitation at ~450 nm. Samples are prepared with absorbance between 0.2-0.4 to avoid reabsorption effects. Multiple measurements (typically ≥6) are averaged to ensure reliability [6].

• Time-Resolved Photoluminescence (TRPL): Carrier recombination dynamics are characterized using a time-correlated single-photon counting system with pulsed laser excitation. Multi-exponential fitting of decay curves reveals trap-assisted nonradiative recombination components, where longer average lifetimes indicate reduced defect density [6].

• X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS): Surface chemical composition and binding states are analyzed using monochromatic Al Kα radiation. Shifts in Pb 4f peaks to lower binding energies indicate enhanced electron shielding due to strong ligand-QD interactions [3].

• Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy: Ligand binding modes are investigated through characteristic vibrational signatures. Weakened C-H stretching modes (2700-3000 cm⁻¹) of native ligands (oleylamine/oleic acid) confirm successful ligand exchange [3].

• Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy: Quantitative ¹H and ³¹P NMR verify ligand attachment to QD surfaces. Appearance of new peaks corresponding to designed ligands and disappearance of native ligand signals confirm successful passivation [3] [4].

Defect Passivation Mechanisms

Surface Trap State Elimination

The primary function of effective ligands is to passivate undercoordinated surface sites that create trap states within the bandgap. Density of states calculations reveal that pristine perovskite QDs possess conspicuous trap states originating from halide vacancies or uncoordinated Pb²⁺ 6pz orbitals [3]. Strategic ligand design directly addresses these defects through multiple mechanisms:

• Multi-site anchoring: Lattice-matched molecules like TMeOPPO-p simultaneously coordinate with multiple undercoordinated surface sites, effectively eliminating trap states and connecting them with the conduction band minimum [3]. Projected density of states analysis demonstrates complete elimination of Pb-6pz trap states around the Fermi level when multi-site anchoring is achieved.

• Halogen vacancy compensation: Ligands designed with bromide counter anions (e.g., AmdBr-C2Ph) directly compensate for halogen defects generated on perovskite surfaces, eliminating dangling bonds of lead and suppressing defect level formation [4]. This approach reduces non-radiative recombination pathways, significantly improving PLQY.

• Strain relaxation: The high surface strain inherent in nanomaterials induces defect formation to relieve lattice distortion. Ligands with strong multiple hydrogen bonding capability (e.g., amidinium groups) can relax crystal strain and suppress consequent defect generation [4].

Enhanced Binding Affinity and Stability

Conventional ligands like oleic acid and oleylamine exhibit dynamic binding behavior, where labile ligands easily detach during purification or aging, leading to defect formation [5]. Advanced ligand designs address this limitation through:

• Stronger binding groups: Phosphine oxide (P=O) groups demonstrate stronger coordination with uncoordinated Pb²⁺ compared to conventional carboxylates or amines [3]. The binding energy calculations confirm that carboxylate groups tend to provide stronger binding than ammonium groups, with bidentate coordination modes enhancing stability [8].

• Rigid Ï€-conjugated systems: Ligands with extended Ï€-electron conjugation create more stable surface attachments compared to aliphatic chains [8]. The conjugated systems also facilitate electronic interaction with the perovskite core, potentially enhancing charge transport while maintaining passivation.

• Short-chain architectures: Reducing alkyl chain length decreases steric hindrance, allowing closer approach to the perovskite surface and stronger interaction [4]. Incorporating electron-delocalized aromatic rings at chain termini counterbalances the reduced dispersibility while maintaining favorable electrical properties.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Reagent Solutions for Perovskite Ligand Research

Reagent Category	Specific Examples	Function/Purpose	Considerations
Binding Groups	Phosphine oxides (TMeOPPO-p) [3]	Strong coordination with uncoordinated Pb²⁺	Lattice matching enhances efficacy
	Carboxylates (cinnamate) [8]	Bidentate binding to surface sites	Electron-withdrawing groups modify orbital energies
	Amidinium salts (AmdBr-C2Ph) [4]	Multiple hydrogen bonding, halogen compensation	Short chains reduce insulating properties
Structural Elements	Extended π-systems [8]	Electronic coupling, enhanced stability	Lowers ligand excitation energies
	Short alkyl chains [4]	Reduced steric hindrance, closer binding	Improves charge injection
	Aromatic termini [4]	Electron delocalization, reduced insulation	Maintains dispersibility while enhancing conductivity
Precursor Additives	Acetate anions [7]	Improve precursor purity, surface passivation	Reduces byproduct formation
	2-Hexyldecanoic acid [7]	Strong binding affinity, defect passivation	Suppresses Auger recombination
Processing Agents	Hydrofluoric acid [6]	Surface oxide removal, trap state suppression	Requires careful handling in controlled environment
	Trioctylphosphine [6]	Chalcogen precursor solvent	Essential for shell growth processes
2-Bicyclo[2.1.1]hexanylmethanamine	2-Bicyclo[2.1.1]hexanylmethanamine HCl	2-Bicyclo[2.1.1]hexanylmethanamine hydrochloride is a rigid bicyclic amine building block for medicinal chemistry and drug discovery research. For Research Use Only. Not for human or veterinary use.	Bench Chemicals
Methyl 3-fluoro-2-vinylisonicotinat	Methyl 3-fluoro-2-vinylisonicotinate|CAS 1379375-19-5	Methyl 3-fluoro-2-vinylisonicotinate (CAS 1379375-19-5) is a versatile fluorinated building block for pharmaceutical and material science research. For Research Use Only. Not for human or animal use.	Bench Chemicals

The strategic design of surface ligands has emerged as a decisive factor in optimizing the optical properties of perovskite quantum dots. Through comparative analysis of recent advances, several key principles emerge: (1) multi-site anchoring with lattice-matched geometries provides superior defect passivation compared to single-site binders; (2) ligand electronic structure directly influences charge transfer and trapping processes; (3) balanced molecular designs that address both passivation and electrical conductivity deliver optimal device performance.

The progression from conventional aliphatic ligands to sophisticated architectures with specific binding motifs, tailored electronic properties, and multi-functional capabilities represents a paradigm shift in perovskite surface engineering. The remarkable PLQY enhancements achieved through these strategies—approaching the theoretical limit of 100%—demonstrate the critical importance of comprehensive surface management. As research advances, the integration of computational prediction with experimental validation will accelerate the discovery of next-generation ligand systems, ultimately enabling the full realization of perovskite QDs in commercial optoelectronic devices.

For researchers entering this field, the experimental protocols and characterization methodologies outlined provide a robust framework for evaluating novel ligand designs. The continued refinement of ligand architectures promises to address remaining challenges in long-term stability and large-scale processing, paving the way for widespread adoption of perovskite nanocrystals in displays, lighting, and emerging quantum technologies.

In the rapidly advancing field of perovskite quantum dot (QD) optoelectronics, surface ligands play a paradoxical yet pivotal role. These organic molecules, essential for stabilizing colloidal nanocrystals during synthesis, function as a double-edged sword: their dynamic binding enables fascinating structural flexibility but compromises stability, while their inherent insulating nature protects quantum confines yet impedes charge transport. This fundamental trade-off represents one of the most significant challenges in developing high-performance optoelectronic devices. Ligands serve as integral components of perovskite quantum dots (PQDs), critically determining their optoelectronic properties, charge carrier dynamics, and ultimately, device performance and stability [9].

Traditional ligands like oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OAm) have been workhorses in perovskite QD synthesis since the field's inception. These long-chain alkyl compounds effectively control nanocrystal growth and provide initial surface passivation. However, their labile binding behavior and electrically insulating hydrocarbon chains introduce substantial limitations for device integration. As researchers push the boundaries of perovskite QD applications in photovoltaics, light-emitting diodes (LEDs), and other optoelectronic devices, understanding and addressing these ligand-mediated trade-offs has become increasingly urgent. This comparison guide examines the fundamental limitations of traditional ligands alongside emerging engineering strategies, providing researchers with a comprehensive resource for navigating this complex landscape.

The Dual Nature of Traditional Ligands: Benefits and Inherent Limitations

Structural Functions and Binding Dynamics

Traditional ligands like OA and OAm serve crucial functions in the synthesis and structural stabilization of perovskite QDs. During crystal growth, these molecules coordinate with surface atoms to control nucleation rates and prevent uncontrolled aggregation. The established covalent bond classification system categorizes these surface ligands based on the number of electrons (0, 1, and 2) donated from the neutral ligand to the binding bond in PQDs [9]. This binding mechanism allows for the creation of stable colloidal solutions with tunable quantum confinement effects.

However, the ionic nature of perovskite materials creates inherently dynamic ligand bonding. The interaction between commonly used alkyl-carboxylic acids and alkyl-amines with the perovskite surface involves relatively weak coordination bonds that undergo continuous attachment and detachment. This dynamic equilibrium causes several detrimental effects:

• Ligand detachment during purification processes leads to nanoparticle aggregation and defect formation
• Structural decomposition due to exposed ionic surfaces
• Batch-to-batch inconsistencies in QD synthesis [9] The unstable binding is particularly problematic during device fabrication, where processing solvents can strip ligands from the QD surface, creating defect states that degrade optical and electronic properties.

Electronic Impacts and Charge Transport Limitations

The electronic influence of traditional ligands presents perhaps the most significant challenge for optoelectronic applications. While effectively confining excitons within the quantum dots, the long hydrocarbon chains of OA and OAm create substantial electronic barriers between adjacent QDs. This insulating character directly compromises charge carrier mobility in QD films, leading to compromised device performance [9].

The fundamental conflict arises from the competing requirements of colloidal stability versus electronic connectivity. Long alkyl chains (typically C18) provide excellent steric stabilization for colloidal dispersions but create excessively thick organic barriers (∼2 nm) between QDs in solid films. This leads to:

• Poor charge extraction in photovoltaic devices
• Reduced current density in light-emitting diodes
• Increased series resistance across devices
• Voltage losses and compromised power conversion efficiencies [9]

Table 1: Key Limitations of Traditional OA/OAm Ligands in Perovskite QD Optoelectronics

Limitation Category	Specific Impact	Consequence on Device Performance
Binding Dynamics	Dynamic bonding nature	QD aggregation during processing
	Labile ligand attachment	Surface defect formation
	Susceptibility to polar solvents	Structural decomposition
Electronic Properties	Long insulating chains	Poor charge carrier mobility
	High inter-dot barrier	Compromised charge extraction
	Electronic decoupling	Reduced current densities
Manufacturing Challenges	Batch-to-batch variation	Poor reproducibility
	Difficult complete replacement	Limited ligand engineering options
	Purification sensitivity	Defect formation during processing

Experimental Methodologies for Investigating Ligand Effects

Synthesis and Ligand Exchange Protocols

Research into ligand engineering relies on standardized synthesis and processing methods that enable precise comparison between different ligand strategies. The hot injection method remains widely employed for producing high-quality perovskite QDs with narrow size distributions. In this approach, a cesium precursor (typically Cs-Oleate) is rapidly injected into a high-temperature solution containing lead halide salts and organic ligands in non-coordinating solvents [2]. The protocol involves:

• Precursor Preparation: Cs2CO3 is reacted with OA in 1-octadecene at 150°C under inert atmosphere
• Reaction Initiation: The Cs-Oleate precursor is swiftly injected into PbX2/OA/OAm/ODE solution at 150-200°C
• Crystal Growth: Reaction proceeds for 5-60 seconds with precise temperature control
• Termination and Purification: Reaction quenched by ice bath followed by centrifugation with anti-solvents [7]

Ligand exchange procedures typically employ polar solvents like methyl acetate or ethyl acetate as washing agents to partially remove native OA/OAm ligands while introducing alternative ligands. More sophisticated approaches utilize solid-state or solution-phase ligand exchange where QD films or solutions are treated with novel ligand compounds dissolved in suitable solvents [9] [10].

Characterization Techniques for Ligand Analysis

Comprehensive characterization of ligand-modified QDs requires multi-technique approaches to correlate surface chemistry with optoelectronic properties:

Structural and Chemical Analysis:

• FTIR Spectroscopy: Identifies functional groups and binding modes of surface ligands
• X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS): Determines elemental composition and chemical states, showing characteristic peak shifts (e.g., Pb 4f shifts to lower binding energies with effective passivation) [3]
• Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR): Quantifies ligand density and binding stability through characteristic peaks (e.g., methoxy group at δ 3.81 in TMeOPPO-p) [3]

Optical and Electronic Characterization:

• Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY): Measures radiative efficiency improvement (from ~59% to 97% with optimal ligands) [3]
• Transient Photoluminescence (TRPL): Quantifies carrier lifetime enhancement (from 14.26 ns to 29.84 ns with proper passivation) [11]
• Electroluminescence Response Time: Evaluates device speed, critical for display applications [11]

Diagram 1: Experimental workflow for investigating ligand effects in perovskite QDs

Emerging Ligand Engineering Strategies: From Molecular Design to Performance

Multi-site Binding and Lattice-Matched Anchors

Conventional passivating ligands typically bind to perovskite surfaces through only a single active site, creating dense resistive barriers while offering limited stability enhancement. Recent breakthroughs address this fundamental limitation through sophisticated molecular design implementing multi-anchoring approaches. A notable example includes an antimony chloride-N,N-dimethyl selenourea complex (Sb(SU)₂Cl₃) that functions as a multi-site binding ligand [12].

This innovative approach enables:

• Quadruple-site binding via two Se and two Cl atoms coordinating with four adjacent undercoordinated Pb²⁺ sites
• Extended hydrogen-bonding network through three NH-Cl bonds and dual intramolecular/intermolecular hydrogen bonds
• Significantly enhanced coordination strength with adsorption energy decreasing as binding sites increase [12]

Similarly, lattice-matched molecular anchors like tris(4-methoxyphenyl)phosphine oxide (TMeOPPO-p) demonstrate the power of geometric precision in ligand design. The interatomic distance of the O atoms in TMeOPPO-p is precisely 6.5 Å, matching the lattice spacing of CsPbI₃ QDs [3]. This perfect geometric compatibility enables:

• Multi-site anchoring interactions that simultaneously passivate multiple surface defects
• Complete elimination of trap states as confirmed by projected density of states calculations
• Near-unity PLQY of 97% compared to 59% for pristine QDs [3]

Conductive Ligands and Ionic Liquid Treatments

Beyond multi-site binding, strategies to address the insulating nature of traditional ligands have yielded impressive results. Short-chain ligands and conjugated molecules enhance inter-dot electronic coupling while maintaining sufficient passivation. Ionic liquids represent another promising approach, as demonstrated by 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium Trifluoromethanesulfonate ([BMIM]OTF) treatment [11].

The [BMIM]OTF approach provides multiple benefits:

• Enhanced crystallinity and reduced surface area ratio of QDs
• Stronger binding energy (-1.49 eV for OTF⁻ vs. -0.95 eV for conventional OTAC with Pb²⁺)
• Defect state reduction and improved PLQY from 85.6% to 97.1%
• Carrier injection enhancement at interfaces [11]

In photovoltaic applications, mixed-cation Cs₀.₅FA₀.₅PbI₃ QDs with optimized ligand engineering have achieved certified efficiencies of 16.6%, surpassing conventional chalcogenide QD solar cells [9]. For light-emitting applications, lattice-matched anchors have enabled external quantum efficiencies exceeding 27% with operational lifetimes over 23,000 hours [3].

Table 2: Performance Comparison of Emerging Ligand Strategies Versus Traditional Approaches

Ligand Strategy	Binding Mechanism	PLQY Improvement	Device Performance	Stability Enhancement
Traditional OA/OAm	Dynamic single-site	Baseline (~59%)	EQE: <20% [3]	Limited operational lifetime
Multi-site Sb(SU)₂Cl₃	Quadruple-site (2Se+2Cl)	Not specified	PCE: 25.03% (solar cell) [12]	T₈₀: 23,325 h (dark storage) [12]
Lattice-matched TMeOPPO-p	Multi-site 6.5Å spacing	59% → 97% [3]	EQE: 27% (LED) [3]	Operating half-life: >23,000 h [3]
Ionic Liquid [BMIM]OTF	Strong anion-cation coordination	85.6% → 97.1% [11]	EQE: 20.94% (LED) [11]	T₅₀: 131.87 h (vs. 8.62 h control) [11]
2D Perovskite (BA)â‚‚PbIâ‚„	Robust shell on non-polar facets	Not specified	PCE: 13.1% (PbS CQD solar cell) [10]	Enhanced ambient and thermal stability [10]

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Successful investigation of ligand effects requires carefully selected reagents and materials. The following toolkit summarizes critical components for perovskite QD ligand research:

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for Perovskite QD Ligand Studies

Reagent Category	Specific Examples	Function & Purpose	Key Characteristics
Traditional Ligands	Oleic Acid (OA), Oleylamine (OAm)	Baseline synthesis & stabilization	Long C18 chains, dynamic binding [9]
Short-chain Ligands	Acetate (AcO⁻), 2-hexyldecanoic acid (2-HA)	Enhanced coupling & passivation	Reduced insulation, stronger binding [7]
Multi-site Binders	Sb(SU)₂Cl₃, TMeOPPO-p	Defect passivation & lattice stabilization	Multiple coordination sites, geometric matching [12] [3]
Ionic Liquids	[BMIM]OTF	Crystallization control & interface improvement	Strong coordination, reduced traps [11]
2D Perovskite Ligands	(BA)₂PbI₄	Surface engineering for stability	Hydrophobic BA⁺ surface, robust shell [10]
Precursor Salts	Cs₂CO₃, PbI₂, PbBr₂	Quantum dot core formation	High purity (>99.99%) for reproducible synthesis [7]
Solvents	Octadecene, DMF, Methyl acetate	Synthesis, purification, ligand exchange	Anhydrous conditions critical for stability [9]
2-Methyl-5-(quinoxalin-2-yl)aniline	2-Methyl-5-(quinoxalin-2-yl)aniline, CAS:433318-46-8, MF:C15H13N3, MW:235.29	Chemical Reagent	Bench Chemicals
(2S)-3-(bromomethyl)but-3-en-2-ol	(2S)-3-(bromomethyl)but-3-en-2-ol|High-Purity		Bench Chemicals

The strategic engineering of surface ligands in perovskite quantum dots has evolved from simple stabilization to sophisticated molecular design that directly addresses the dual challenges of dynamic binding and insulating character. The emergence of multi-site binding ligands, lattice-matched anchors, and conductive ligand systems demonstrates the remarkable progress in overcoming fundamental limitations that have long constrained device performance.

Future research directions will likely focus on several key areas: First, computational screening and machine learning approaches will accelerate the discovery of optimal ligand structures with customized electronic properties and binding geometries [8]. Second, the development of multi-functional ligands that simultaneously address passivation, charge transport, and environmental protection represents a promising holistic approach. Finally, scaling these advanced ligand strategies to industrial-scale manufacturing while maintaining performance advantages remains a critical challenge requiring further innovation.

As ligand design continues to mature, the performance gap between traditional and engineered ligand systems is expected to widen, potentially unlocking the full theoretical potential of perovskite quantum dots for a new generation of optoelectronic devices. The transition from serendipitous ligand selection to rational molecular design marks an exciting maturation of the field and offers a clear pathway toward commercial viability.

The journey toward commercializing perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) in optoelectronics is primarily hampered by stability issues. A detailed understanding of the factors governing their degradation is crucial for designing robust materials. Central to this understanding are the A-site cation in the ABX3 perovskite structure and the binding energy of surface ligands, which collectively act as a key determinant of thermal and structural stability. This guide provides a comparative analysis of how these factors influence stability, supported by experimental data, to inform material selection and design in optoelectronic research.

Comparative Analysis of A-site Cation Composition

The chemical composition at the A-site of the perovskite lattice (ABX3) is a critical factor controlling the fundamental thermal degradation pathway of the material.

Table 1: Thermal Degradation Behavior of CsxFA1-xPbI3 PQDs

A-site Composition	Primary Thermal Degradation Pathway	Onset Temperature Observations	Key Experimental Evidence
Cs-rich (e.g., CsPbI3)	Phase transition from black γ-phase to yellow, non-perovskite δ-phase [13].	—	In situ XRD shows emergence of peaks at 25.4°, 25.8°, 30.7°, and 36.9° associated with the δ-phase [13].
FA-rich (e.g., FAPbI3)	Direct decomposition into PbI2, bypassing the yellow δ-phase [13].	Slightly better thermal stability than CsPbI3 PQDs [13].	In situ XRD shows appearance of PbI2 peaks (25.2°, 29.0°, 41.2°) upon heating; no δ-phase peaks observed [13].
Mixed A-site (CsxFA1-xPbI3)	Degradation mechanism interpolates between Cs-rich and FA-rich behavior [13].	—	—

A critical and counter-intuitive finding is that hybrid organic-inorganic FA-rich PQDs can exhibit slightly better thermal stability than their all-inorganic Cs-rich counterparts [13]. This highlights that the intrinsic stability of the inorganic lattice is not the sole determining factor; the interaction of the A-site cation with the surface chemistry plays a pivotal role.

The Critical Role of Surface Ligand Binding Energy

Surface ligands passivate reactive sites on PQDs, and the strength of their attachment, quantified by the binding energy, is directly linked to enhanced stability.

Table 2: Impact of Ligand Binding on Perovskite Stability and Performance

Ligand / Passivation Strategy	Binding Target / Mechanism	Experimental Outcome	Effect on Stability & Performance
Oleylamine/Oleic Acid	Surface of CsxFA1-xPbI3 PQDs [13].	Higher ligand binding energy for FA-rich PQDs correlates with their superior thermal stability [13].	Enhanced thermal stability; FA-rich PQDs show higher PLQY and longer TRPL lifetime [13].
Triphenylphosphine Oxide (TPPO)	Under-coordinated Pb²⁺ at perovskite/ETL interface [14].	XPS confirmed Pb 4f peak shift, indicating strong interaction; champion PCE of 26.01% [14].	Retained 90% of initial PCE after 1200 h of operational MPPT tracking [14].
Multi-site Sb(SU)₂Cl₃ Complex	Binds four adjacent sites via 2 Se and 2 Cl atoms on perovskite surface [12].	PCE of 25.03% in fully air-processed devices; T80 lifetime of 5,004 h at 85°C [12].	Unencapsulated devices showed exceptional thermal and operational stability [12].
Trioctylphosphine (TOP)	Site-selective passivation of surface S atoms on PbS QDs [15].	No obvious fluorescence quenching or oxidation after 30 days of air exposure [15].	Enabled NIR LEDs with a lifetime of >10,000 h [15].

First-principle DFT calculations establish that FA-rich PQDs possess higher ligand binding energy for conventional ligands like oleylamine and oleic acid compared to Cs-rich PQDs [13]. This stronger binding provides a more effective protective shell, delaying the onset of decomposition.

Advanced ligand engineering further demonstrates that moving from single-site to multi-site binding ligands (e.g., Sb(SU)₂Cl₃) offers a more robust solution. This approach simultaneously achieves deep trap passivation and low interfacial resistance for efficient charge extraction, leading to record stabilities [12].

Experimental Protocols and Methodologies

In Situ Structural and Optical Characterization

A key methodology for probing thermal stability involves in situ measurements, where the material is analyzed while being heated.

• In Situ XRD: PQD films are subjected to a controlled temperature ramp (e.g., from 30 °C to 500 °C) under an inert atmosphere (e.g., argon flowing). The diffraction patterns are collected in real-time to monitor phase transitions (e.g., γ- to δ-phase in CsPbI3) or the emergence of decomposition products like PbI2 [13].
• In Situ Photoluminescence (PL): Simultaneously, temperature-dependent PL spectroscopy can be performed. This tracks changes in emission intensity, peak position, and width, providing insights into defect formation and phase stability [13].

Surface Binding Energy Calculation

• Density Functional Theory (DFT) Calculations: First-principle DFT calculations are used to compute the ligand binding energy on different perovskite surfaces. The adsorption energy (Eads) is calculated as Eads = E(total) - E(surface) - E_(ligand), where a more negative value indicates stronger, more favorable binding. These calculations can compare binding strengths across different A-site compositions (Cs vs. FA) and different ligand anchoring groups [13] [12].

Device Stability Testing

• Operational Stability: For solar cells, maximum power point tracking (MPPT) under continuous 1-sun illumination is the standard. Stability is reported as the time (e.g., T80) for the power conversion efficiency to drop to 80% of its initial value [14] [12].
• Thermal Stability: Unencapsulated devices are stored in a dark oven at a constant elevated temperature (e.g., 85 °C), and their performance is periodically measured to determine the degradation rate [12].

Signaling Pathways and Stability Relationships

The following diagram illustrates the logical relationship between A-site composition, ligand engineering, and the resulting stability outcomes of perovskite quantum dots.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Reagents for Perovskite Quantum Dot Stability Research

Reagent / Material	Function / Role in Research
Cesium Carbonate (Cs₂CO₃) & Formamidinium Iodide (FAI)	Precursors for A-site cations (Cs⁺ and FA⁺) in perovskite synthesis [13] [16].
Lead Iodide (PbI₂)	The primary source of Pb²⁺ and I⁻ for the perovskite BX framework [13] [16].
Oleic Acid (OA) & Oleylamine (OAm)	Standard long-chain ligands for colloidal synthesis, providing steric stabilization [13].
Trioctylphosphine (TOP) / Trioctylphosphine Oxide (TOPO)	Ligand modifiers used to enhance passivation and control optical properties [16] [15].
Triphenylphosphine Oxide (TPPO)	A molecular ligand for interface passivation, effectively coordinating with under-coordinated Pb²⁺ [14].
Antimony Chloride-N,N-dimethyl Selenourea Complex (Sb(SU)₂Cl₃)	An advanced multi-site binding ligand for superior defect passivation and stability [12].
1-Octadecene (ODE)	A common non-polar solvent for high-temperature synthesis of quantum dots [16].
2-(2-Aminoethyl)isoindolin-1-one	2-(2-Aminoethyl)isoindolin-1-one, CAS:350046-24-1, MF:C10H13BrN2O, MW:257.131
2-(4-Ethylphenoxy)acetohydrazide	2-(4-Ethylphenoxy)acetohydrazide, CAS:300821-52-7, MF:C10H14N2O2, MW:194.234

The stability of perovskite quantum dots is not dictated by a single factor but by the intricate interplay between A-site cation chemistry and surface ligand binding energy. While Cs-rich PQDs are susceptible to phase transitions, FA-rich compositions, especially when paired with high-binding-energy ligands, demonstrate enhanced resilience against thermal decomposition. The emerging paradigm of multi-anchoring ligands offers a promising path toward reconciling high efficiency with long-term operational stability, providing a clear design rule for the next generation of stable perovskite optoelectronics.

Advanced Ligand Engineering Strategies for High-Performance PQD Devices

The synthesis of halide perovskite nanomaterials is a cornerstone of modern optoelectronics research, enabling precise control over the size, morphology, and ultimately, the functional properties of these promising semiconductors. Among the diverse fabrication strategies developed, three methods have emerged as particularly influential for producing perovskite nanocrystals (NCs) and quantum dots (QDs): hot-injection, ligand-assisted reprecipitation (LARP), and mechanochemical synthesis. Each technique offers distinct advantages, limitations, and suitability for specific research and development goals. Operating through fundamentally different principles—from high-temperature solution chemistry to room-temperature solid-state reactions—these methods provide researchers with a versatile toolkit for material design. This guide provides a comparative analysis of these core synthesis routes, detailing their protocols, performance outcomes, and specific applications in the context of perovskite quantum dot optoelectronics, with a particular focus on how surface ligand management dictates final material properties.

The table below summarizes the core characteristics, advantages, and limitations of the three primary synthesis methods.

Table 1: Comparative Overview of Core Perovskite Nanomaterial Synthesis Methods

Synthesis Method	Key Principle	Best For	Key Advantages	Inherent Limitations
Hot-Injection [2]	Rapid injection of precursor into hot solvent to induce instantaneous nucleation.	High-quality, monodisperse NCs/QDs (0D) & Nanowires (1D) [2] [17]	Excellent size & shape control; High crystallinity; Superior optoelectronic properties [2]	Requires inert atmosphere; Complex setup; High-temperature processing; Limited scalability [2]
Ligand-Assisted Reprecipitation (LARP) [2] [18]	Precipitation of NCs by dissolving precursors in a solvent and introducing an anti-solvent.	Rapid, scalable synthesis of NCs; Compositional screening [19] [20]	Simple setup; Ambient conditions; Low cost; High throughput potential [18] [19]	Broader size distribution; Lower crystallinity; Sensitivity to anti-solvent/ligand ratios [20]
Mechanochemical Synthesis [21] [22]	Grinding solid precursors using mechanical force (ball-milling) to trigger chemical reactions.	Lead-free perovskites; Solvent-free, green synthesis; Stable, pure-phase powders [21] [22]	Solvent-free; Room-temperature; High yield & scalability; Excellent stoichiometric control [21] [22]	Powder form requires further processing for films; Potential for contamination from milling media [22]

Detailed Experimental Protocols and Performance Data

Hot-Injection Synthesis

The hot-injection method is renowned for producing high-quality nanocrystals with excellent crystallinity and narrow size distributions [2]. The following protocol for synthesizing CsPbBr3 nanowires illustrates a specific application of this method [17].

Detailed Protocol:

• Precursor Preparation: Cesium oleate (Cs-OA) precursor is prepared by reacting Cs2CO3 with oleic acid (OA) in 1-octadecene (ODE) at 150°C under vacuum until clear [17].
• Reaction Setup: PbBr2 is dissolved in ODE in a separate flask and dried under vacuum at 120°C [17].
• Ligand Introduction: An organic amine ligand (e.g., oleylamine - OAm) is injected under an inert N2 atmosphere. The temperature is raised to a specific set point (e.g., between 105-185°C) and stabilized [17].
• Nucleation Trigger: The preheated Cs-OA precursor is rapidly injected into the reaction mixture [17].
• Crystal Growth: The reaction proceeds for a controlled duration (e.g., from 5 seconds to 60 minutes) to allow for anisotropic growth into nanowires [17].
• Quenching & Purification: The reaction is quenched in an ice-water bath. The NWs are purified via centrifugation and dispersed in a non-polar solvent like cyclohexane [17].

Performance and Ligand Role: This method enables precise tuning of optical properties. For instance, halide ion exchange can shift the photoluminescence (PL) of CsPbBr3 NWs across the entire visible spectrum [17]. The choice of organic amine ligands (e.g., OAm, dodecylamine) is critical, as they not only passivate surface defects but also direct anisotropic growth into high-aspect-ratio nanowires by selectively binding to specific crystal facets [17]. This results in materials with high photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) and low electrochemical impedance, making them suitable for high-performance applications like photoelectrocatalysis and LEDs [17].

Ligand-Assisted Reprecipitation (LARP)

LARP is a simpler, more accessible method suitable for rapid prototyping and scalable NC production [18]. The synthesis of CsPbI3 perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) highlights the critical role of surface ligand modification.

Detailed Protocol:

• Precursor Solution: Precursors (e.g., Cs2CO3, PbI2) and ligand modifiers (e.g., trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO), l-phenylalanine (L-PHE)) are dissolved in a good solvent like dimethylformamide (DMF) [16].
• Reprecipitation: This precursor solution is rapidly injected into a poor solvent (anti-solvent) such as toluene under vigorous stirring [2] [16].
• Nucleation & Passivation: The sudden change in solvent environment causes supersaturation and instantaneous nucleation of PQDs. The ligands coordinate with the perovskite surface to control growth and passivate defects [16].
• Purification: The resulting colloidal solution is purified by centrifugation to remove aggregates and excess ligands [16].

Performance and Ligand Role: Synthesis parameters are crucial for final properties. For CsPbI3 PQDs, an optimal synthesis temperature of 170°C yields the highest PL intensity and narrowest full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM), indicating high color purity [16]. Ligand passivation, using molecules like TOPO and L-PHE, directly enhances PL intensity and phase stability by effectively capping the nanocrystal surface and suppressing defect-induced non-radiative recombination [16]. This method has been successfully integrated with machine learning to efficiently map the complex synthesis parameter space and identify optimal ligand and anti-solvent combinations for achieving stable, iodine-rich compositions [19] [20].

Mechanochemical Synthesis

This solvent-free approach is recognized for its environmental friendliness and scalability, particularly for lead-free perovskite systems [21] [22].

Detailed Protocol:

• Loading: Stoichiometric amounts of solid precursor salts (e.g., CsBr and SbBr3 for Cs3Sb2Br9) are loaded into a milling jar along with grinding media like stainless-steel balls [22].
• Milling: The jar is sealed and placed in a high-energy planetary ball mill. The materials are milled for a defined period at room temperature [22].
• Kinetic Control: The process relies on mechanical energy to initiate solid-state diffusion and chemical reactions. Milling time is a key parameter controlling the degree of crystallinity and phase purity [22].
• Collection: The final perovskite product is obtained as a fine powder after milling, requiring no solvent-based purification [22].

Performance and Ligand Role: Unlike solution-based methods, mechanosynthesis does not typically use traditional organic ligands during synthesis. Stability and properties are governed by the intrinsic crystal structure and composition. For example, Cs3Sb2Br9 forms completely after 7 hours of milling and exhibits superior long-term stability, whereas Cs3Bi2Br9 forms rapidly within 1 hour but can partially decompose upon prolonged milling [22]. This method provides exceptional control over stoichiometry, enabling the synthesis of complex mixed-cation/anion compositions like (FAPbI3)x(MAPbBr3)1−x, which have achieved power conversion efficiencies (PCE) of 16.7% in solar cells [21].

Synthesis Workflow and Research Toolkit

Synthesis Method Decision Workflow

The following diagram illustrates the logical decision-making process for selecting an appropriate synthesis method based on research objectives and constraints.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

The table below catalogs key reagents and their functions in the synthesis of halide perovskite nanomaterials.

Table 2: Essential Reagents for Perovskite Nanomaterial Synthesis

Reagent Category	Specific Examples	Primary Function	Synthesis Method
Cation Precursors	Cesium Carbonate (Cs₂CO₃), Cesium Oleate (Cs-OA), Thallium(I) Acetate (CH₃CO₂Tl) [16] [23] [17]	Source of 'A-site' cation (Cs⁺, Tl⁺) in ABX₃ structure [23]	Hot-Injection, LARP
Metal Precursors	Lead(II) Bromide (PbBr₂), Tin(II) Iodide (SnI₂), Antimony Bromide (SbBr₃) [16] [23] [22]	Source of 'B-site' metal cation (Pb²⁺, Sn²⁺, Sb³⁺) [23] [22]	All Three
Solvents & Media	1-Octadecene (ODE), Toluene, Dimethylformamide (DMF) [16] [17]	Reaction medium (ODE), Anti-solvent (Toluene), Good solvent (DMF) [2] [16]	Hot-Injection, LARP
Surface Ligands	Oleic Acid (OA), Oleylamine (OAm), Trioctylphosphine (TOP), Dioleamide (DOA) [16] [23] [17]	Passivate surface defects; Control crystal growth & morphology; Enhance stability & dispersion [16] [23]	Hot-Injection, LARP
Grinding Media	Stainless Steel Balls [22]	Provide mechanical energy for solid-state reactions	Mechanochemical
2-(2-Chloropyridin-4-yl)propan-2-ol	2-(2-Chloropyridin-4-yl)propan-2-ol, CAS:1240620-98-7, MF:C8H10ClNO, MW:171.62	Chemical Reagent	Bench Chemicals
5-Bromo-3-fluoroisatoic anhydride	5-Bromo-3-fluoroisatoic Anhydride|	5-Bromo-3-fluoroisatoic Anhydride is a chemical synthesis building block For Research Use Only. Not for human or veterinary use.	Bench Chemicals

```

This structured comparison of hot-injection, LARP, and mechanochemical synthesis provides a foundational framework for researchers to select and optimize fabrication routes for halide perovskite nanostructures, with a clear understanding of how methodological choices and ligand engineering directly influence material properties and device performance.

In the pursuit of high-performance optoelectronic devices, perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) have emerged as a leading material class due to their exceptional photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY), tunable bandgaps, and defect-tolerant nature [2]. The precise control over the synthesis of these nanomaterials is paramount, and in-situ ligand engineering has proven to be a critical strategy for directing nucleation and growth processes. This approach involves the introduction of ligand molecules during the synthetic reaction, rather than in a separate post-processing step, allowing for real-time manipulation of crystal formation, surface passivation, and final particle properties [24].

The fundamental challenge in PQD synthesis lies in their ionic crystal structure and dynamic surface, which makes them susceptible to degradation from environmental factors such as humidity, oxygen, and light [16] [24]. Traditional long-chain ligands like oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OAm) provide initial stabilization but often bind weakly to the PQD surface, leading to detachment and subsequent aggregation or decomposition over time [24]. In-situ ligand engineering addresses these limitations by employing molecules that strongly coordinate with the perovskite surface, effectively suppressing defect formation and enhancing the colloidal and optical stability of the resulting QDs. This guide provides a comparative analysis of cutting-edge in-situ ligand strategies, evaluating their performance against conventional methods through experimental data and detailed protocols.

Ligand Engineering Approaches: A Comparative Analysis

The efficacy of a ligand is determined by its functional groups, molecular structure, and binding mode. The following sections compare the performance of different ligand classes, from small molecules to complex 2D perovskite-like structures.

Conventional Organic Ligands vs. Advanced Molecular Designs

• Conventional Ligands: OA and OAm are the most commonly used ligands in traditional PQD synthesis, such as the hot-injection method. They facilitate precursor dissolution and provide basic surface coverage but exhibit dynamic binding and are prone to detachment [24].
• Advanced Bifunctional Ligands: Recent studies have introduced more complex organic molecules designed for stronger and more multifunctional interactions with the PQD surface.

Table 1: Performance Comparison of Organic Ligand Strategies

Ligand System	PQD Material	Key Experimental Findings	Advantages over Conventional OA/OAm
L-Phenylalanine (L-PHE) [16]	CsPbI3	Enhanced PL intensity and phase stability at optimal synthesis temperature (170°C).	Improved passivation, leading to higher emission purity and narrow FWHM.
BODIPY-OH [25]	MAPbBr3	Efficient singlet oxygen generation for photocatalytic antibacterial applications; successful integration into a SiO2-coated composite.	Dual functionality: surface passivation and enabling energy/charge transfer for novel applications (e.g., photocatalysis).
Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid (DBSA) [26]	CsPbBr3	Achieved ultra-small QDs (2.6 nm, blue emission at 461 nm) with a high PLQY of 90.7%.	Superior control over nucleation rate, suppresses Ostwald ripening, and enhances stability against aggregation.

Halide-Based and 2D Perovskite-Like Ligands

Moving beyond organic molecules, inorganic and structured ligands offer enhanced passivation and stability, particularly for challenging interfaces.

• Metal Halide Salts: Salts like ZnBr2 can be used synergistically with organic ligands. The Zn²⁺ ion can bind strongly to surface atoms, enhancing the effectiveness of the primary organic ligand (e.g., DBSA) and reducing surface defect density [26].
• 2D Perovskite-like Ligands: This innovative approach uses the precursors of two-dimensional perovskites, such as (BA)â‚‚PbIâ‚„ (BA = butylammonium), as ligands for quantum dots like PbS [10]. This forms a robust, thin shell that effectively passivates non-polar facets, which are challenging to stabilize with simpler ligands.

Table 2: Performance of Inorganic and 2D Perovskite-like Ligands

Ligand System	QD Material / Application	Key Experimental Findings	Performance Advantage
ZnBrâ‚‚ + DBSA [26]	CsPbBr3 QDs for blue LEDs	PLQY of 90.7%; excellent storage and photo-stability.	Synergistic effect: ZnBrâ‚‚ reduces defects, while DBSA controls growth and dispersion.
Methylammonium Iodide (MAI) [27]	PbS/MAPbI3 core-shell nanorod solar cells	Suppressed interfacial non-radiative recombination; improved VOC and PCE.	Minimal steric hindrance enhances binding; participates in perovskite lattice formation.
Lead Iodide (PbIâ‚‚) [27]	PbS/MAPbI3 core-shell nanorod solar cells	Improved charge transport but induced tensile strain at the heterojunction.	Effective defect passivation; a standard in the field for QD solar cells.
2D (BA)₂PbI₄ [10]	PbS CQD Infrared Solar Cells	PCE of 13.1% for 1.3 eV-bandgap CQDs; significantly enhanced thermal and ambient stability.	Versatile passivation of different crystalline facets; hydrophobic BA⁺ provides environmental stability.

Experimental Protocols for Key In-Situ Ligand Strategies

To ensure reproducibility and provide a practical toolkit for researchers, this section details the methodologies from seminal studies cited in this guide.

This protocol is designed for achieving highly stable, ultra-small QDs with high PLQY.

• Preparation of Cs-Oleate Precursor: Csâ‚‚CO₃ is mixed with 1-octadecene (ODE) and OA in a flask, dried under vacuum, and heated under Nâ‚‚ until all Csâ‚‚CO₃ reacts.
• Preparation of Pb-Precursor Solution: In a separate three-neck flask, PbBrâ‚‚, ZnBrâ‚‚, DBSA, ODE, OA, and OAm are loaded. The mixture is dried under vacuum and then heated to 120°C under Nâ‚‚ until a clear solution is obtained.
• Hot-Injection and Reaction: The temperature of the Pb-precursor solution is stabilized at 170°C. The Cs-oleate precursor is swiftly injected. The reaction proceeds for 10 seconds before cooling in an ice-water bath.
• Purification: The crude solution is centrifuged with methyl acetate to precipitate the QDs. The supernatant is discarded, and the pellet is re-dispersed in toluene or hexane.

This method describes a solution-phase ligand exchange to form a protective 2D perovskite shell on PbS CQDs.

• Synthesis of OA-capped PbS CQDs: PbS-OA CQDs are first synthesized via the standard hot-injection method.
• Preparation of 2D Perovskite Precursor Solution: A stoichiometric mixture of PbIâ‚‚, n-BAI (butylammonium iodide), and ammonium acetate (as a colloidal stabilizer) is dissolved in dimethylformamide (DMF).
• Ligand Exchange: The PbS-OA CQD solution (in non-polar octane) is mixed with the (BA)â‚‚PbIâ‚„ precursor solution (in polar DMF). During mixing, the long-chain OA ligands are displaced by the 2D perovskite precursors, transferring the QDs into the DMF phase.
• Purification and Film Formation: The CQDs are purified by precipitating with toluene and re-dispersing in a solvent like hexane for subsequent layer-by-layer film deposition in device fabrication.

This protocol uses a ligand-assisted reprecipitation (LARP) method for functional hybrid QDs.

• Synthesis of Crude MAPbBr₃ QDs: MAPbBr₃ QDs are prepared by reacting MABr and PbBrâ‚‚ in a mixture of DMF, OA, and OAm. This crude solution is then added to toluene to induce reprecipitation of the QDs.
• In-Situ Ligand Modification: The BODIPY-OH ligand is dissolved in toluene. The crude MAPbBr₃ QD solution is then added dropwise to the BODIPY solution under vigorous stirring, allowing the ligand exchange to occur during the final stage of QD formation.
• Purification: The resulting BDP/QDs are purified by centrifugation and re-dispersed in toluene for further use or encapsulation.

Mechanisms and Workflow: Visualizing Ligand-Mediated Nucleation

The following diagram synthesizes the core concepts from the reviewed literature to illustrate how different in-situ ligand strategies control the nucleation and growth of perovskite quantum dots.

Diagram 1: Mechanism of In-Situ Ligand-Mediated Nucleation and Growth. This workflow illustrates the general mechanism by which ligands introduced during synthesis control PQD formation. Ligands present in the precursor solution immediately adsorb to the earliest crystal nuclei. This adsorption dictates the subsequent growth phase by modulating the addition rate of precursors and, as exemplified by DBSA [26], suppressing Ostwald ripening (the dissolution of smaller crystals and growth of larger ones). The final product is a quantum dot whose surface is effectively passivated by the strongly-bound ligands, leading to high stability and photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY).

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

This table catalogs key reagents used in the featured in-situ ligand engineering studies, providing researchers with a quick reference for experimental design.

Table 3: Essential Reagents for In-Situ Ligand Engineering Experiments

Reagent / Material	Function in Synthesis	Example from Literature
Oleic Acid (OA) & Oleylamine (OAm)	Common long-chain ligands for initial stabilization and solubility in non-polar solvents; part of the standard synthesis toolkit.	Used in nearly all protocols as a base or co-ligand [16] [26] [25].
Dodecylbenzenesulfonic Acid (DBSA)	Surfactant ligand that slows nucleation rate and suppresses Ostwald ripening for ultra-small, uniform QDs.	Used with ZnBr₂ to synthesize 2.6 nm CsPbBr₃ QDs [26].
Zinc Bromide (ZnBr₂)	Metal halide additive that enhances ligand binding and reduces surface defect density.	Synergistic use with DBSA for high PLQY CsPbBr₃ [26].
Butylammonium Iodide (BAI)	Precursor for forming 2D perovskite ligands, providing robust passivation and hydrophobicity.	Used to create (BA)â‚‚PbIâ‚„ ligands for PbS CQDs [10].
BODIPY-OH	Functional organic dye ligand that enables energy/charge transfer for applications beyond light emission.	Used to passivate MAPbBr₃ QDs for photocatalytic singlet oxygen generation [25].
L-Phenylalanine	Amino-acid based ligand for effective surface passivation of all-inorganic PQDs.	Used to modify CsPbI₃ PQDs for improved optical properties [16].
Methylammonium Iodide (MAI)	Short-chain halide ligand that passivates surfaces and integrates into the perovskite lattice.	Used for passivating the interface in PbS/MAPbI₃ core-shell structures [27].
1-(2-Phenylindolizin-3-yl)ethanone	1-(2-Phenylindolizin-3-yl)ethanone, CAS:38320-58-0, MF:C16H13NO, MW:235.286	Chemical Reagent
alpha-(4-Biphenylyl)benzylamine	alpha-(4-Biphenylyl)benzylamine, CAS:91487-88-6, MF:C19H17N, MW:259.352	Chemical Reagent

In perovskite quantum dot (PQD) optoelectronics research, surface ligands are indispensable for governing both the intrinsic properties of the quantum dots and the performance of the final devices. Post-synthesis ligand exchange, the process of replacing long-chain insulating ligands attached during synthesis with shorter, more conductive molecules, is a critical step in materials engineering. This guide provides an objective comparison of the two predominant strategies for this process—solid-state and solution-phase ligand exchange—framed within the broader thesis that tailoring the ligand exchange approach is fundamental to optimizing the electronic coupling, stability, and charge transport in PQD films for advanced optoelectronic applications.

Fundamental Principles of Ligand Exchange

Ligand exchange is performed to address a fundamental challenge in nanocrystal science: the long-chain organic ligands (e.g., oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OAm)) that ensure colloidal stability during synthesis act as insulating barriers in quantum dot solid films, severely hampering inter-dot charge transport [28] [29]. The process involves substituting these native ligands with shorter organic or inorganic molecules, which reduces the inter-dot spacing and enhances electronic coupling.

The efficacy of this process is profoundly influenced by the ligand binding affinity, the steric hindrance of the incoming ligand, and the solvent environment. Furthermore, different ligand systems can impart varying degrees of passivation to surface defects, which are non-radiative recombination centers that degrade both photoluminescence quantum yield and device performance [16] [30]. The choice between solid-state and solution-phase exchange determines the extent of ligand substitution, the uniformity of the resulting film, and the final optoelectronic properties.

Solid-State Ligand Exchange

Methodology and Experimental Protocols

Solid-state ligand exchange (SS-LE) is typically performed after a film of quantum dots capped with their native long-chain ligands has been deposited onto a substrate. The film is then treated with a solution containing the desired short-chain ligand, which diffuses into the film to replace the original surfactants.

A representative advanced protocol is the sequential solid-state multiligand exchange. In a study on FAPbI3 PQDs, a film of OA/OAm-capped dots was treated with a solution of 3-mercaptopropionic acid (MPA) and formamidinium iodide (FAI) in methyl acetate (MeOAc) [28]. This process achieved approximately 85% removal of the original insulating ligands, as confirmed by proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy. The sequential use of MPA and FAI allowed for a more comprehensive passivation of surface sites, leading to improved film quality and conductivity.

Performance and Experimental Data

The performance of devices fabricated via SS-LE demonstrates significant enhancements. The table below summarizes key findings from recent research.

Table 1: Performance Outcomes of Solid-State Ligand Exchange

PQD System	Ligand Exchange Protocol	Key Performance Metrics	Reference
FAPbI₃ PQDs	Sequential Multiligand (MPA/FAI)	≈28% improvement in PCE; Reduced hysteresis; Enhanced stability	[28]
FAPbI₃ PQDs	LE-TA (Ligand exchange + Thermal Annealing)	Improved carrier transport in PQD solid films	[31]
PbS CQDs	Solid-state exchange with MAPbI₃	Achieved a PCE of 5.28% in solar cells	[10]

Workflow Visualization

The following diagram illustrates the standard workflow for a solid-state ligand exchange process.

Solution-Phase Ligand Exchange

Methodology and Experimental Protocols

Solution-phase ligand exchange is conducted in a colloidal suspension before film deposition. This method often involves a phase-transfer process, where the quantum dots are transferred from a non-polar solvent to a polar one as their surface chemistry is modified.

A prominent example is the in situ solution-phase ligand exchange developed for PbS CQDs. In this protocol, a precursor solution for a 2D perovskite ligand, such as (BA)â‚‚PbIâ‚„ (BA = butylammonium), is injected into a solution of OA-capped PbS CQDs in n-octane [10]. The CQDs, now capped with the short (BA)â‚‚PbIâ‚„ ligands, become dispersible in the polar solvent N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF). This method is noted for forming a robust shell around the CQDs that effectively passivates challenging non-polar crystal facets.

Another critical aspect is solvent engineering. Research on CsPbI₃ PQDs highlights that the dielectric constant and acidity of the solvent used for the short ligand solution are crucial. Tailoring these properties enables more controllable ligand exchange, effectively removing long-chain ligands without introducing harmful halogen vacancy defects [32].

Performance and Experimental Data

Solution-phase methods have demonstrated remarkable success in enhancing device performance and stability, as summarized below.

Table 2: Performance Outcomes of Solution-Phase Ligand Exchange

PQD/CQD System	Ligand Exchange Protocol	Key Performance Metrics	Reference
PbS CQDs	In situ (BA)â‚‚PbIâ‚„ exchange	PCE of 13.1% (1.3 eV CQDs); 8.65% (1.0 eV CQDs); Superior ambient/thermal stability	[10]
CsPbI₃ PQDs	Solvent-mediated ligand exchange	Record PCE of 16.53% for inorganic PQDSCs at the time	[32]
FAPbI₃ PQDs	PhFACl passivation in MeOAc	PCE increased from 4.63% to 6.4%; Improved electronic coupling	[31]
CISe₂ CNCs	Two-step (MPA then MoS₄²⁻)	Enhanced photocarrier separation for water splitting	[33]

Workflow Visualization

The following diagram illustrates the standard workflow for a solution-phase ligand exchange process.

Comparative Analysis: Solid-State vs. Solution-Phase Approaches

A direct, side-by-side comparison of the two ligand exchange strategies reveals a trade-off between film quality and processing simplicity.

Table 3: Objective Comparison of Ligand Exchange Approaches

Aspect	Solid-State Ligand Exchange	Solution-Phase Ligand Exchange
Process Simplicity	Simpler; direct film treatment [28]	More complex; involves phase transfer and purification [10]
Film Quality	Higher risk of film cracking/crumpling during exchange [30]	Enables formation of dense, uniform films from pre-exchanged dots
Ligand Exchange Efficiency	Can be less complete; may leave residual long ligands in the film bulk [28]	Often more thorough and uniform exchange in solution [10]
Defect Passivation	Effective, especially with multiligand systems (e.g., MPA/FAI) [28]	Excellent, allows for robust shell formation (e.g., (BA)â‚‚PbIâ‚„) [10]
Typical PCEs Cited	Moderate to high (e.g., 28% improvement from a baseline) [28]	Very high (e.g., 13.1% for PbS, 16.53% for CsPbI₃) [32] [10]
Stability	Good improvement over untreated films [28]	Often superior due to more complete passivation and hydrophobic ligands (e.g., BA⁺) [10]
Best Suited For	Rapid prototyping, systems sensitive to polar solvents	High-performance devices where stability and efficiency are paramount

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents and Materials

Successful ligand exchange relies on a suite of specialized reagents and materials. The table below details key components used in the protocols cited in this guide.

Table 4: Key Research Reagent Solutions and Materials

Reagent/Material	Function in Ligand Exchange	Examples from Literature
Methyl Acetate (MeOAc)	Anti-solvent for purification and ligand exchange solvent. Effectively removes long ligands without destroying the perovskite crystal structure.	Used in solid-state multiligand exchange on FAPbI₃ [28] and as an anti-solvent for FAPbI₃ PQD post-treatment [31].
3-Mercaptopropionic Acid (MPA)	Short-chain organic ligand. The thiol (-SH) group has strong binding affinity to metal atoms (e.g., Pb) on the PQD surface.	Used sequentially with FAI in a solid-state multiligand exchange for FAPbI₃ PQDs [28]. Also used in a two-step process for CISe₂ CNCs [33].
Formamidinium Iodide (FAI)	Short organic cation. Used to fill A-site cation vacancies on the PQD surface, improving structural stability and reducing defects.	Paired with MPA in a solid-state multiligand exchange to passivate different surface sites [28].
(BA)â‚‚PbIâ‚„ Precursors (BAI, PbIâ‚‚)	Precursors for in situ formation of 2D perovskite-like ligands. Provide robust passivation of non-polar facets and enhance stability.	Used in a solution-phase exchange for PbS CQDs, yielding high efficiency and stability [10].
Benzamidine Hydrochloride (PhFACl)	Short, bifunctional ligand. The formamidine group fills A-site vacancies, while Cl⁻ fills X-site vacancies, enabling dual passivation.	Employed as a surface capping ligand for FAPbI₃ PQDs during post-treatment, boosting PCE [31].
Dimethylformamide (DMF)	Polar solvent for dissolving short ligand salts and facilitating phase transfer of quantum dots during solution-phase exchange.	Used as the solvent for (BA)â‚‚PbIâ‚„ precursors during solution-phase exchange of PbS CQDs [10].
Methyl 2-cyclopropyl-2-oxoacetate	Methyl 2-cyclopropyl-2-oxoacetate, CAS:6395-79-5, MF:C6H8O3, MW:128.127	Chemical Reagent
Potassium;4-formylbenzenesulfonate	Potassium;4-formylbenzenesulfonate, CAS:54110-22-4, MF:C7H5KO4S, MW:224.27	Chemical Reagent

The choice between solid-state and solution-phase ligand exchange is not a matter of declaring a universal winner but of selecting the right tool for a specific research goal. Solid-state exchange offers a more straightforward path to improved devices and is highly adaptable, especially with multiligand strategies. Solution-phase exchange, while more complex, provides a pathway to superior and more consistent film morphology, more complete ligand coverage, and consequently, higher device performance and stability, as evidenced by record-breaking solar cell efficiencies. The broader thesis in PQD optoelectronics is confirmed: the meticulous engineering of the nanocrystal surface through optimized ligand exchange is as crucial as the synthesis of the nanocrystal core itself. Future developments will likely focus on hybrid approaches and the discovery of novel ligand molecules that offer perfect passivation with minimal steric hindrance.

The surface chemistry of perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) is a critical determinant in the development of high-performance optoelectronic devices. Surface ligands—organic molecules bound to the nanocrystal surface—govern essential properties including charge transport, defect passivation, and environmental stability [9]. While all PQD devices require some balance of these properties, the optimal ligand design diverges significantly between photovoltaics (PV), which prioritize efficient charge extraction, and light-emitting diodes (LEDs), which require maximized radiative recombination [9] [34].

This comparison guide analyzes ligand engineering strategies for these distinct applications, presenting quantitative performance data and detailed experimental protocols to inform research and development efforts.

Ligand Function and Design Principles

Surface ligands serve dual roles: they passivate surface defects to suppress non-radiative recombination and stabilize the nanocrystal colloid in solution and within solid-state films [9] [35]. Their molecular structure directly impacts device performance. Long, insulating alkyl chains (e.g., in oleic acid and oleylamine) provide excellent colloidal stability but impede charge transport between QDs, a particular detriment to solar cell efficiency [9]. Consequently, a primary goal of ligand engineering is to replace or modify these native ligands with functional molecules that address application-specific requirements.

Table 1: Core Functions of Surface Ligands in Perovskite Quantum Dots

Function	Impact on PQD Properties	Relevant Ligand Types
Surface Passivation	Reduces trap states, increases Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY)	Lewis bases (P=O, C=O, -NHâ‚‚, -OH), halides [3] [7]
Charge Transport Modulation	Governs dot-to-dot electronic coupling; can be insulating or conductive	Short-chain ligands, conjugated molecules, ionic liquids [9] [11]
Colloidal & Structural Stability	Prevents aggregation, enhances phase stability, protects against moisture/oxygen	Long alkyl chains, multi-dentate ligands, cross-linkable molecules [16] [9]
Crystallization Control	Modulates crystal growth rate and final nanocrystal size	Sterically bulky ligands, coordinating additives [11] [7]

The following diagram illustrates the decision pathway for selecting ligands based on the target application and desired property enhancements.

Ligand Engineering for Photovoltaics

Optimization Strategies and Key Ligands

In perovskite quantum dot solar cells (QDSCs), the central challenge is to overcome the insulating nature of native ligands while maintaining sufficient passivation and stability [9]. The prevailing strategy is ligand exchange, which replaces long-chain insulating ligands with shorter or more conductive molecules.

A highly effective bifunctional ligand is L-phenylalanine (L-PHE). When added in situ during synthesis, it significantly reduces surface defects and increases the vacancy formation energy, leading to CsPbI₃ QDSCs with a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 14.62% [36]. Other successful ligand systems include formamidinium iodide (FAI) and cesium acetate (CsOAc), which enhance dot-to-dot electronic coupling and passivate surface defects. Using a combination of FAI, CsOAc, and guanidinium thiocyanate during ligand exchange has enabled mixed-cation Cs₀.₅FA₀.₅PbI₃ QDs to achieve a certified efficiency of 16.6%, surpassing conventional chalcogenide QDSCs [9].

Experimental Protocol: In Situ L-PHE Passivation

Summary: This protocol describes the integration of L-phenylalanine into the CsPbI₃ PQD synthesis for enhanced performance in PV and LED devices [36].

Materials:

• Precursors: Cesium carbonate (Csâ‚‚CO₃, 99%), Lead(II) iodide (PbIâ‚‚, 99%)
• Solvents and Ligands: 1-Octadecene (ODE, 90%), Oleic Acid (OA, 90%), Oleylamine (OAm, 90%), L-Phenylalanine (L-PHE, 98%)
• Reaction Medium: Trioctylphosphine (TOP, 99%) and Trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO, 99%)

Procedure:

• Precursor Preparation: Dissolve Csâ‚‚CO₃ in ODE with OA and OAm at 150°C. Separately, prepare a lead precursor by dissolving PbIâ‚‚ in ODE with OA and OAm at 120°C.
• In Situ Passivation: Add the designated quantity of L-PHE directly to the lead precursor solution before the hot-injection step.
• QD Synthesis: Rapidly inject the cesium precursor into the vigorously stirred lead precursor solution at a controlled temperature of 170°C.
• Reaction and Purification: Allow the reaction to proceed for a specific duration (e.g., 10-15 seconds), then cool the mixture in an ice bath. Isolate the PQDs via centrifugation and wash as needed.

Note: The precise molar ratios of precursors, the concentration of L-PHE, and the reaction temperature are critical parameters that require optimization for reproducible results [16] [36].

Ligand Engineering for Light-Emitting Diodes

Optimization Strategies and Key Ligands

For perovskite QD LEDs (PeLEDs), the emphasis shifts toward achieving near-unity photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) and operational stability, which requires exceptionally effective defect passivation and suppression of ion migration [3]. Molecular design that precisely matches the perovskite lattice has emerged as a powerful strategy.

A landmark design is the lattice-matched anchor molecule, tris(4-methoxyphenyl)phosphine oxide (TMeOPPO-p). The interatomic distance of its oxygen atoms (6.5 Å) matches the lattice spacing of CsPbI₃ QDs, enabling multi-site anchoring that effectively passivates uncoordinated Pb²⁺ and stabilizes the lattice. This molecule has yielded PeLEDs with a remarkable external quantum efficiency (EQE) of 27% and a greatly extended operating half-life of over 23,000 hours [3].

Ionic liquids represent another promising ligand class. The ionic liquid 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium Trifluoromethanesulfonate ([BMIM]OTF) enhances crystallinity and reduces the surface area ratio of QDs, which decreases defect states. This treatment has been used to fabricate ultra-high-resolution PeLEDs (9072 PPI) with a nanosecond-scale response time (700 ns) and a high EQE of 15.79% for microdisplays [11].

Experimental Protocol: TMeOPPO-p Lattice-Anchoring

Summary: This procedure involves a post-synthesis treatment of CsPbI₃ QDs with the custom-synthesized TMeOPPO-p molecule to achieve multi-site defect passivation [3].

Materials:

• Synthesized QDs: CsPbI₃ QDs synthesized via a standard hot-injection method and purified.
• Anchoring Molecule: Tris(4-methoxyphenyl)phosphine oxide (TMeOPPO-p).
• Solvents: Ethyl acetate, hexane (anhydrous).

Procedure:

• QD Purification: Synthesize and purify CsPbI₃ QDs using a standard method, resulting in a solution in a non-polar solvent like hexane.
• Ligand Exchange Solution: Prepare a solution of TMeOPPO-p in ethyl acetate at a defined concentration.
• Treatment Process: Add the TMeOPPO-p solution dropwise to the QD solution under vigorous stirring. The polar solvent (ethyl acetate) facilitates the partial removal of native oleate/oleylamine ligands and their replacement by TMeOPPO-p.
• Incubation and Isolation: Stir the mixture for a predetermined time to allow complete ligand exchange. Isolate the passivated QDs via centrifugation.
• Washing and Redispersion: Wash the pellet to remove excess ligands and byproducts, then redisperse the final QDs in an appropriate solvent for film deposition.

Characterization: Successful anchoring is confirmed by Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) showing weakened C-H stretches from original ligands, X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) showing a shift in Pb 4f peaks, and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) confirming the presence of TMeOPPO-p on the QD surface [3].

Comparative Performance Analysis

Table 2: Quantitative Performance Comparison of Ligand Strategies

Application	Ligand Type / Molecule	Key Performance Metrics	Reference
Photovoltaics	L-Phenylalanine (L-PHE)	PCE: 14.62% (CsPbI₃ QDSCs)	[36]
Photovoltaics	Formamidinium Iodide / Cs Acetate	PCE: 16.6% (Cs₀.₅FA₀.₅PbI₃ QDSCs)	[9]
Light-Emitting Diodes	TMeOPPO-p (Lattice-matched)	EQE: 27.0%, T₅₀: >23,000 h (CsPbI₃ PeLEDs)	[3]
Light-Emitting Diodes	Ionic Liquid ([BMIM]OTF)	EQE: 20.94%, Response: 700 ns (CsPbBr₃ PeLEDs)	[11]
Light-Emitting Diodes	DDAB (Quaternary Ammonium)	Enabled stretchable n-type photosynaptic transistors	[37]

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Reagents for Ligand Engineering Research

Reagent / Material	Function in Research	Example Application
Oleic Acid (OA) / Oleylamine (OAm)	Standard long-chain ligands for colloidal synthesis and initial surface passivation.	Universal starting point in hot-injection synthesis of PQDs [16] [35]
L-Phenylalanine (L-PHE)	Bifunctional ligand for in situ defect passivation and stability enhancement.	Improving PCE in solar cells and EQE in LEDs [16] [36]
TMeOPPO-p	Lattice-matched multi-site anchor for deep defect passivation and stability.	Achieving record-high EQE and lifetime in red PeLEDs [3]
Ionic Liquids (e.g., [BMIM]OTF)	Additive for enhancing crystallinity, reducing defects, and improving charge injection.	Enabling nanosecond-response, ultra-high-resolution PeLEDs [11]
Formamidinium Iodide (FAI)	Short conductive ligand for exchange to improve inter-dot charge transport.	Boosting efficiency in perovskite quantum dot solar cells [9]
DDAB (Didodecyldimethylammonium Bromide)	Branched ligand to improve compatibility with n-type polymers and reduce aggregation.	Fabricating stretchable photosynaptic transistors [37]
3-Formylphenyl 3-chlorobenzoate	3-Formylphenyl 3-chlorobenzoate|CAS 444285-23-8	High-purity 3-Formylphenyl 3-chlorobenzoate for research (RUO). A key building block for synthesizing advanced organic materials. Not for human or veterinary use.
(4-Aminobut-2-yn-1-yl)dimethylamine	(4-Aminobut-2-yn-1-yl)dimethylamine|CAS 53913-95-4	High-purity (4-Aminobut-2-yn-1-yl)dimethylamine for research. CAS 53913-95-4, Molecular Formula C6H12N2. For Research Use Only. Not for human or veterinary use.

The strategic design of surface ligands is paramount for unlocking the full potential of perovskite quantum dots in optoelectronics. As the data demonstrates, the optimal ligand chemistry is fundamentally dictated by the target application. Photovoltaics demand ligands that facilitate efficient charge transport, often through short-chain or conductive molecules like L-phenylalanine and formamidinium iodide. In contrast, light-emitting diodes require ligands that maximize radiative efficiency and operational stability, achieved through strongly passivating, multi-dentate molecules like TMeOPPO-p or ionic liquids.

Future progress will likely involve the development of increasingly sophisticated multifunctional ligands and precise treatment protocols. The experimental frameworks and comparative data provided in this guide serve as a foundation for researchers to advance the rational design of surface chemistry, ultimately accelerating the commercialization of high-performance perovskite quantum dot photovoltaics and displays.

Formamidinium lead iodide (FAPbI3) perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) have emerged as a promising photovoltaic absorber material, combining the ideal bandgap of FAPbI3 (approximately 1.45-1.51 eV) with the exceptional stability and defect tolerance of quantum-confined nanostructures [38] [39]. However, the insulating long-chain ligands essential for synthesizing and stabilizing colloidal PQDs severely impede charge transport in quantum dot solar cells (QDSCs), limiting device performance [38] [40] [41]. This case study objectively compares three advanced ligand management strategies—sequential ligand exchange, multiligand passivation, and functional ligand engineering—detailing their experimental protocols, quantitative performance outcomes, and applicability for different research objectives.

Experimental Strategies and Performance Comparison

Table 1: Comparison of Ligand Management Strategies for FAPbI3 PQD Solar Cells

Strategy	Key Ligands/Reagents	Reported PCE (%)	Key Stability Performance	Primary Advantages
Sequential Ligand Exchange [38]	Dipropylamine (DPA), Benzoic Acid (BA)	12.13 (Flexible, 0.06 cm²)	Enhanced mechanical stability on flexible substrates	One-step fabrication, improved electronic coupling, reduced defects
Sequential Solid-State Multiligand Exchange [39]	3-Mercaptopropionic Acid (MPA), Formamidinium Iodide (FAI)	28% improvement (vs. control)	Reduced hysteresis, improved operational stability	~85% ligand removal, hybrid passivation, reduced inter-dot spacing
Functional Ligand Passivation [40]	2-(9H-Carbazol-9-yl)ethyl Phosphonic Acid (2PACz)	High Pₒᵤₜ for indoor (123.3 µW/cm²)	80% Pₒᵤₜ retention after 500 h (15-20% RH)	A- and X-site vacancy passivation, superior for indoor photovoltaics

Detailed Experimental Protocols

Sequential Ligand Exchange (DPA + BA)

• PQD Synthesis: FAPbI3 PQDs were synthesized via a standard hot-injection method. Lead iodide (PbI2) and formamidinium iodide (FAI) were typically used as precursors, dissolved in solvents like dimethylformamide (DMF) or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and injected into a high-temperature (e.g., 70°C) mixture of 1-octadecene (ODE) with coordinating ligands oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OAm) [38].
• Ligand Exchange Process: The synthesized PQDs, capped with native OA/OAm ligands, were subjected to a sequential treatment.
  • DPA Treatment: Dipropylamine (DPA) was introduced to remove the long-chain OA/OAm ligands. This step improves electronic conductivity but can introduce extra surface defects.
  • BA Treatment: Benzoic acid (BA), a short-chain ligand, was subsequently added to passivate the surface defects created by DPA and complete the ligand exchange process [38].
• Device Fabrication: The ligand-exchanged PQD ink was deposited onto the substrate (rigid or flexible). For flexible devices, this often involves low-temperature processed charge transport layers. The architecture was typically n-i-p, with the FAPbI3 PQD film as the active layer [38].

Sequential Solid-State Multiligand Exchange (MPA + FAI)

• PQD Synthesis: Stable FAPbI3 colloidal QDs (CQDs) were synthesized via a modified Ligand-Assisted Reprecipitation (LARP) method. This is a simpler, low-temperature alternative to hot-injection. A precursor solution containing PbI2, FAI, OA, and octylamine (OctAm) in acetonitrile was injected into preheated toluene (70°C) and then quenched [39].
• Purification and Ligand Exchange:
  • Liquid Purification: The crude PQD solution was purified by adding methyl acetate (MeOAc) as an antisolvent, followed by centrifugation. This step removes residual precursors and excess free ligands.
  • Solid-State Ligand Exchange: The purified PQD film, deposited via spin-coating, was treated with a solution containing MPA and FAI in MeOAc. This critical step replaces the remaining long-chain OctAm and OA ligands with the short, conductive MPA and FAI ligands [39].
• Device Fabrication: The study employed an n–i–p solar cell architecture using FTO/SnO2 as the electron transport layer and Spiro-OMeTAD as the hole transport layer [39].

Functional Ligand Passivation (2PACz)

• PQD Synthesis and Film Deposition: CsPbI3 PQDs (often used as a reference for FAPbI3 studies) were synthesized via the hot-injection method. The PQD film was fabricated using the conventional layer-by-layer (LBL) technique, where each layer is spin-coated and treated with an antisolvent (e.g., methyl acetate) to remove long ligands and improve film density [40].
• Ligand Passivation Process: After the final LBL deposition cycle, the PQD film was treated with a solution of 2PACz. This molecule functionalizes the PQD surface without a full exchange. The amine and phosphonic acid groups in 2PACz effectively passivate both A-site (cation) and X-site (halide) vacancies on the PQD surface [40].
• Device Fabrication for Indoor PVs: Devices were completed with standard charge transport layers (e.g., SnO2 for ETL and Spiro-OMeTAD for HTL) and tested under indoor lighting conditions (e.g., fluorescent lamps at 1000 lux) [40].

The workflow for the sequential solid-state multiligand exchange strategy, which is common to many of these approaches, can be visualized as follows:

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 2: Key Reagents for FAPbI3 PQD Ligand Management Research

Reagent Category	Specific Examples	Function/Purpose
Precursors	Lead Iodide (PbI₂), Formamidinium Iodide (FAI) [38] [39]	Provides Pb²⁺, FA⁺, and I⁻ ions for the FAPbI3 crystal structure.
Solvents & Ligands (Synthesis)	1-Octadecene (ODE), Oleic Acid (OA), Oleylamine (OAm), Octylamine (OctAm) [38] [39] [41]	High-boiling solvent (ODE); Coordinating ligands for nucleation, growth, and colloidal stability (OA, OAm, OctAm).
Antisolvents (Purification)	Methyl Acetate (MeOAc), Ethyl Acetate (EtOAc), Toluene, Hexane [38] [39] [40]	Precipitates and purifies PQDs; used in liquid purification and solid-state ligand exchange steps.
Short-Chain / Functional Ligands	Benzoic Acid (BA), 3-Mercaptopropionic Acid (MPA), Dipropylamine (DPA) [38] [39]	Replaces long-chain ligands to enhance inter-dot charge transport (BA, MPA) or assist in ligand removal (DPA).
Passivating Cations/Additives	Formamidinium Iodide (FAI) [39], 2PACz [40]	Passivates A-site vacancies (FA⁺); Multi-functional passivation of A- and X-site vacancies (2PACz).
4-Methyl-1,3-benzoxazole-2-thiol	4-Methyl-1,3-benzoxazole-2-thiol|CAS 93794-44-6
5-Bromo-1-butyl-1H-indole-2,3-dione	5-Bromo-1-butyl-1H-indole-2,3-dione|CAS 332929-55-2	5-Bromo-1-butyl-1H-indole-2,3-dione (CAS 332929-55-2) is a brominated isatin derivative for research use. For Research Use Only. Not for human or veterinary use.

The choice of ligand management strategy for FAPbI3 PQD solar cells depends heavily on the target application and desired device properties. Sequential ligand exchange (DPA+BA) offers a streamlined, one-step process suitable for efficient flexible devices. The solid-state multiligand approach (MPA+FAI) provides the most thorough ligand replacement, ideal for maximizing conductivity and PCE in rigid cells. Finally, functional ligand passivation (2PACz) excels in applications where exceptional long-term stability under low-light or indoor conditions is paramount. This comparative analysis provides researchers with a clear framework for selecting and implementing the optimal ligand strategy for their specific photovoltaic development goals.

Solving PQD Instability: Ligand Solutions for Thermal and Photodegradation

The operational stability of perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) is a paramount concern in their development for optoelectronic devices. A critical aspect of this stability is understanding the distinct thermal degradation pathways these materials undergo, which are fundamentally governed by their chemical composition and surface chemistry. This guide objectively compares two primary thermal failure modes—phase transition and direct decomposition—exhibited by CsxFA1-xPbI3 PQDs across the compositional spectrum. The central thesis is that the A-site cation composition (Cesium vs. Formamidinium) and the associated surface ligand binding energy collectively determine the dominant degradation pathway, ultimately influencing the thermal resilience and operational lifespan of PQD-based devices. This comparison is framed within the broader context of surface ligand effects, as ligands are not merely passive stabilizers but active determinants in the thermodynamic and kinetic processes of material degradation [13].

Comparative Analysis of Degradation Pathways

The thermal degradation of CsxFA1-xPbI3 PQDs is not a universal process but diverges along two distinct pathways based on the A-site cation composition.

Direct Decomposition Pathway in FA-Rich PQDs

Formamidinium-rich PQDs (with low values of 'x' in CsxFA1-xPbI3) follow a direct decomposition pathway when subjected to thermal stress. In-situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies reveal that upon heating from approximately 150 °C, FA-rich PQDs begin to decompose directly into lead iodide (PbI2), as indicated by the emergence of characteristic PbI2 diffraction peaks at 25.2°, 29.0°, and 41.2° [13]. Notably, during the initial stages of heating (150-300 °C), a concurrent process occurs: the undegraded PQDs undergo grain growth and merging, evidenced by the sharpening and intensification of the original perovskite diffraction peaks. The black-phase perovskite completely decomposes into PbI2 by 350 °C, which subsequently melts and evaporates under argon flow above 400 °C. No intermediate perovskite phase transitions are observed during this process, and the organic FAI component likely decomposes into gaseous products such as HCN and NH3 [13].

Phase Transition Pathway in Cs-Rich PQDs

In contrast, Cesium-rich PQDs (with high 'x' values) undergo a phase transition-mediated degradation. Instead of direct decomposition, these materials experience a crystal phase transition from the photoactive black γ-phase (perovskite phase) to a non-photoactive yellow δ-phase at elevated temperatures [13]. This transition is identifiable in in-situ XRD patterns by the significant increase in peaks at 25.4°, 25.8°, 30.7°, and 36.9°, which correspond to the δ-phase [13]. Atomic-resolution imaging studies using integrated differential phase contrast scanning transmission electron microscopy (iDPC-STEM) have visualized this process, quantifying the rotation angles of PbI6 octahedra that underpin the phase transition [42]. This structural evolution from the γ-phase to the δ-phase represents a primary degradation mechanism for all-inorganic Cs-rich PQDs before eventual decomposition.

Table 1: Comparative Summary of Thermal Degradation Pathways in PQDs

Characteristic	FA-Rich PQDs (Direct Decomposition)	Cs-Rich PQDs (Phase Transition)
Primary Degradation Onset Temperature	~150 °C	Varies by exact composition; generally lower than FA-rich
Initial Degradation Product	PbI2	Yellow orthorhombic δ-phase
Secondary Process	Grain growth/merging of remaining PQDs (150-300 °C)	-
Final Degradation Stage	Complete decomposition to PbI2 at ~350 °C, followed by evaporation	Decomposition to PbI2 after phase transition
Observable Structural Changes	Emergence of PbI2 XRD peaks; no perovskite phase transition	XRD peak shifts indicating γ- to δ-phase transition; octahedral rotation
Organic Component Fate	Decomposes to gaseous products (HCN, NH3)	Not applicable (all-inorganic)

The Critical Role of Surface Ligands

Surface ligands are integral to the stability and degradation behavior of PQDs, influencing not only the degradation pathway but also the overall thermal resilience.

Ligand Binding Energy Dictates Stability

First-principle density functional theory (DFT) calculations demonstrate that the binding strength of common ligands (e.g., oleylamine and oleic acid) to the PQD surface is composition-dependent. FA-rich PQDs exhibit higher ligand binding energy compared to Cs-rich PQDs [13]. This stronger binding directly correlates with their observed thermal stability, explaining why hybrid organic-inorganic FA-rich PQDs can paradoxically demonstrate slightly better thermal stability than all-inorganic CsPbI3 PQDs despite the organic component. The ligand binding energy effectively creates a stabilizing shell that impedes degradation initiation.

Ligand Engineering for Enhanced Stability

Research consistently shows that strategic ligand modification can significantly improve PQD stability. For example, replacing oleic acid with 2-hexyldecanoic acid (2-HA) as a short-branched-chain ligand results in stronger binding affinity to the QD surface, better passivation of surface defects, and more effective suppression of non-radiative recombination [7]. Similarly, acetate ions (AcO−) can act as surface ligands, enhancing homogeneity and reproducibility while passivating dangling surface bonds [7]. These ligand engineering approaches directly influence the thermal degradation thresholds by strengthening the interface between the PQD core and its environment.

Table 2: Ligand Modification Effects on PQD Properties

Ligand Type	Key Properties	Impact on PQD Stability & Performance
Oleylamine/Oleic Acid	Standard long-chain ligands	Moderate binding energy; sufficient for basic stabilization
2-Hexyldecanoic Acid (2-HA)	Short-branched-chain ligand	Stronger binding affinity; better defect passivation; suppresses Auger recombination
Acetate (AcO−)	Dual-functional ligand	Enhances precursor purity; passivates surface bonds; improves homogeneity
Trioctylphosphine (TOP)	Phosphorus-based ligand	Used in synthesis modification; influences structural and optical properties
Trioctylphosphine Oxide (TOPO)	Phosphine oxide ligand	Coordination ligand; affects crystal growth and surface passivation
L-Phenylalanine (L-PHE)	Amino acid ligand	Biocompatible option; provides alternative binding moieties for passivation

Experimental Protocols and Methodologies

In-situ Characterization of Degradation Pathways

In-situ XRD Analysis: To monitor structural changes during thermal degradation, PQD films are deposited on substrates and placed in a temperature-controlled stage within an X-ray diffractometer. Patterns are collected while ramping temperature from 30°C to 500°C at a controlled rate under inert atmosphere (e.g., argon flow). This protocol identifies phase transitions (via peak shifts or new phase emergence) and decomposition products (via PbI2 peak appearance) [13].

In-situ iDPC-STEM for Atomic-Level Imaging: For atomic-resolution observation of phase transitions, PQDs are dispersed on a specialized in-situ heating chip. Using low-dose integrated Differential Phase Contrast STEM, images are acquired at progressively higher temperatures (room temperature to 250°C). The rotation angles of PbI6 octahedra (θ1 and θ2) are quantitatively measured from these images to characterize phase distribution and transition dynamics [42]. This technique directly visualizes the structural evolution from γ-phase to δ-phase in Cs-rich PQDs.

Synthesis and Ligand Modification Protocols

Hot-Injection Method for CsPbI3 PQDs: A standard synthesis involves preparing cesium precursor by reacting Cs₂CO₃ with oleic acid in 1-octadecene at 150°C under nitrogen. The lead precursor is separately prepared by dissolving PbI₂ with oleic acid and oleylamine in octadecene. The cesium precursor is swiftly injected into the lead precursor at temperatures between 140-180°C, with subsequent cooling in an ice bath. PQDs are purified via centrifugation and redispersion in organic solvents [16].

Ligand Exchange Procedure: For surface ligand modification, purified PQDs are dispersed in hexane. A solution of new ligands (e.g., 2-hexyldecanoic acid) is added dropwise under stirring. The mixture is incubated for a specific duration (e.g., 1-2 hours) to allow ligand exchange, followed by precipitation with antisolvent and centrifugation to remove displaced ligands [7].

Quantitative Data Comparison

Table 3: Experimental Data on Composition-Dependent PQD Properties

PQD Composition	PL Emission Range	PLQY	Degradation Onset Temperature	Primary Degradation Pathway	LO Phonon-Electron Coupling Strength
CsPbI3 (x=1)	~650 nm	Lower	Lower	Phase Transition (γ-to-δ)	Weaker
Cs0.5FA0.5PbI3	650-800 nm	Moderate	Moderate	Mixed Mechanism	Intermediate
FAPbI3 (x=0)	~800 nm	Higher	Higher (~150 °C)	Direct Decomposition to PbI2	Stronger

Signaling Pathways and Mechanisms

The following diagram illustrates the divergent thermal degradation pathways in perovskite quantum dots, highlighting the critical decision points influenced by A-site composition and surface ligand properties.

Research Reagent Solutions Toolkit

Table 4: Essential Research Reagents for PQD Synthesis and Stability Studies

Reagent/Chemical	Function in Research	Application Context
Cesium Carbonate (Cs₂CO₃)	Cesium precursor for all-inorganic PQDs	Synthesis of CsPbI3 and Cs-rich mixed-cation PQDs
Formamidinium Iodide (FAI)	A-site cation precursor for hybrid PQDs	Synthesis of FAPbI3 and FA-rich mixed-cation PQDs
Lead Iodide (PbIâ‚‚)	Lead and halide source	Essential precursor for all lead-iodide PQDs
Oleic Acid	Surface ligand and reaction modifier	Common carboxylic acid ligand for stabilization
Oleylamine	Surface ligand and reaction modifier	Common amine ligand for stabilization
2-Hexyldecanoic Acid (2-HA)	Short-branched-chain ligand	Enhanced binding affinity and defect passivation
Acetate Salts (e.g., CsAc)	Dual-functional precursor/ligand	Improves precursor purity and surface passivation
Trioctylphosphine (TOP)	Ligand and reaction medium modifier	Influences crystal growth and surface properties
Trioctylphosphine Oxide (TOPO)	Coordination ligand	Affects crystal growth and surface passivation
1-Octadecene	Non-coordinating solvent	Primary reaction medium for high-temperature synthesis

The identification of failure modes in perovskite quantum dots reveals a fundamental dichotomy: Cs-rich PQDs predominantly fail through a phase transition mechanism (γ-to-δ), while FA-rich PQDs undergo direct decomposition to PbI2. This distinction is not merely academic but has practical implications for device design and stabilization strategies. The critical mediating role of surface ligands—with higher binding energies in FA-rich systems conferring relative thermal stability—underscores the importance of surface chemistry in determining degradation pathways. Future research should focus on leveraging these insights to design compositionally optimized PQDs with tailored surface chemistries that resist both failure modes, potentially through mixed-cation approaches and advanced ligand engineering. The experimental methodologies and comparative data presented here provide a framework for such systematic investigations, moving the field toward more thermally robust PQD optoelectronics.

The operational stability of perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) remains a critical barrier to their commercialization in optoelectronic devices. Among the various degradation mechanisms, thermal instability poses a particularly significant challenge, as device operation and processing often generate elevated temperatures that accelerate performance decay. While numerous strategies have been explored to enhance PQD thermal stability, the energy with which surface ligands bind to the quantum dot core has emerged as a fundamental factor governing thermal degradation resistance. This review systematically examines the relationship between ligand binding energy and thermal stability across different PQD compositions and ligand architectures, providing researchers with comparative data and methodological approaches for designing more robust perovskite quantum dot systems.

Fundamental Mechanisms of Thermal Degradation

Understanding thermal degradation pathways is essential for developing effective stabilization strategies. Research reveals that thermal degradation mechanisms vary significantly with PQD composition. For Cs-rich PQDs, thermal degradation primarily occurs through a phase transition from the black γ-phase to a non-emissive yellow δ-phase [13]. In contrast, FA-rich PQDs with higher ligand binding energy demonstrate different behavior, directly decomposing into PbI2 without undergoing a phase transition [13]. This fundamental difference in degradation pathways highlights the critical role of A-site cation composition and its interaction with surface ligands.

At the molecular level, thermal energy activates several detrimental processes: lattice distortion increases non-radiative recombination, surface defects become activated, and halide ion migration accelerates [43]. These processes collectively contribute to the precipitous decline in luminescence efficiency observed in PQDs under thermal stress. The ionic nature of perovskite materials makes them particularly vulnerable to these degradation mechanisms, especially at the high surface-area-to-volume ratio characteristic of quantum dots [43].

Ligand Binding Energy and Thermal Stability Relationships

Compositional Dependence of Ligand Binding

The binding energy between surface ligands and PQDs exhibits strong compositional dependence. Studies comparing CsxFA1-xPbI3 PQDs across the entire compositional range have revealed that FA-rich PQDs possess significantly stronger ligand binding energy compared to their Cs-rich counterparts [13]. This enhanced binding directly correlates with improved thermal stability, as confirmed through combined experimental and computational approaches.

First-principle density functional theory (DFT) calculations provide quantitative insights into these binding energy differences. The computational models demonstrate that the molecular structure of FA cations enables more favorable interactions with common ligands like oleylamine and oleic acid [13]. These stronger interactions create a more robust protective layer around the quantum dots, effectively raising the energy barrier for thermal degradation processes.

Impact of Binding Energy on Degradation Kinetics

The strength of ligand binding directly influences the kinetic parameters of thermal degradation. PQDs with higher ligand binding energy exhibit:

• Increased activation energy for degradation: Requiring higher thermal energy to initiate decomposition
• Reduced rate constant for defect formation: Slowing the accumulation of non-radiative recombination centers
• Extended half-life at operational temperatures: Providing practical improvements in device longevity

These effects manifest clearly in comparative studies, where FA-rich PQDs with stronger ligand binding maintain structural integrity at temperatures where Cs-rich analogues undergo rapid degradation [13].

Comparative Analysis of Ligand Engineering Strategies

Conventional Organic Ligands

Traditional long-chain ligands like oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OAm) have been widely employed in PQD synthesis, but their dynamic binding characteristics and insulating properties limit thermal stability and charge transport.

Table 1: Performance Comparison of Conventional Ligand Systems

Ligand System	Binding Strength	PLQY (%)	Thermal Stability	Key Limitations
OA/OAm (standard)	Moderate	70-90	Poor (>50% PL loss at 100°C)	Dynamic binding, ligand loss
Shorter-chain alkylamines	Improved	80-92	Moderate	Reduced dispersibility
Branched carboxylic acids	High	85-95	Good	Complex synthesis

Advanced Ligand Architectures

Recent innovations in ligand design have focused on enhancing binding energy through molecular engineering.

Dual-shell engineering represents a significant advancement, where ZnF2 post-treatment creates a unique dual-shell structure on CsPbBr3 PQDs [43]. This approach forms CsPbBr3:F as the inner shell with a zinc-based secondary shell that bonds with both Br and F ions [43]. The synergistic effect of this architecture enables outstanding thermal stability at 120°C while achieving a remarkable photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) of 97% [43].

Lattice-matched molecular anchors constitute another breakthrough strategy. Tris(4-methoxyphenyl)phosphine oxide (TMeOPPO-p) exemplifies this approach, with precisely spaced binding groups (P=O and -OCH3) matching the 6.5 Å lattice spacing of CsPbI3 PQDs [3]. This multi-site anchoring provides exceptionally strong interaction with uncoordinated Pb²⁺ sites, delivering a PLQY of 97% and dramatically enhanced thermal stability [3].

Table 2: Performance Metrics of Advanced Ligand Systems

Ligand Strategy	PLQY (%)	PL Retention at 120°C	Binding Energy	Device Lifetime
Conventional OA/OAm	70-90	<20%	Moderate	<100 h
Dual-shell (ZnF2)	97	>80%	Very High	>1000 h
Lattice-matched (TMeOPPO-p)	97	>90%	Exceptional	>23,000 h

Experimental Protocols for Binding Energy Assessment

Synthesis and Ligand Engineering Methods

Dual-shell Engineering Protocol:

• Synthesize CsPbBr3 PQDs using ligand-assisted reprecipitation at room temperature without inert gas protection [43]
• Prepare precursor solutions: Cs2CO3 in n-octanoic acid (OTAc) and Pb²⁺ precursor with didodecyl dimethylammonium bromide (DDAB)
• Rapidly inject cesium precursor into lead precursor with vigorous stirring
• Introduce ZnF2 inorganic ligand solution and continue stirring
• Purify via centrifugation and redispersion in toluene [43]

Lattice-matched Anchor Protocol:

• Synthesize CsPbI3 QDs using modified hot-injection method [3]
• Purify QDs using standard polar solvent washing
• Treat QD solution with TMeOPPO-p molecules (5 mg mL⁻¹ in ethyl acetate)
• Incubate with agitation to ensure complete ligand exchange
• Isolate functionalized QDs through precipitation and centrifugation [3]

Characterization Techniques

Thermal Stability Assessment:

• Perform in-situ XRD during temperature ramping from 30°C to 500°C
• Monitor phase transitions and decomposition onset temperatures
• Conduct thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) to quantify ligand loss
• Measure photoluminescence intensity at elevated temperatures with time

Binding Energy Quantification:

• Employ density functional theory (DFT) calculations to model ligand-PQD interactions
• Use X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to monitor binding energy shifts
• Conduct Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy to identify coordination modes
• Perform nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) to verify surface attachment

Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for Ligand Engineering Studies

Reagent/Category	Specific Examples	Function & Mechanism
Precursor Salts	Cs₂CO₃, PbBr₂, ZnF₂	Provide metal cation sources for core and shell formation
Conventional Ligands	Oleic Acid (OA), Oleylamine (OAm)	Surface passivation, steric stabilization
Short-chain Ligands	n-octanoic acid (OTAc), octylamine	Improved binding affinity, reduced interdot distance
Inorganic Ligands	Tetraoctylammonium bromide (TOAB)	Enhanced conductivity, stronger coordination
Lattice-matched Anchors	TMeOPPO-p, TFPPO, TClPPO	Multi-site defect passivation, structural stabilization
Solvents	Toluene, ethyl acetate, n-hexane	Dispersion medium, purification

The critical relationship between ligand binding energy and thermal stability in perovskite quantum dots has been firmly established through systematic investigation. Advanced ligand engineering strategies, particularly dual-shell architectures and lattice-matched molecular anchors, have demonstrated exceptional effectiveness in combating thermal degradation while maintaining high optoelectronic performance. These approaches represent significant progress toward commercially viable PQD devices with operational lifetimes exceeding practical requirements.

Future research directions should focus on developing quantitative structure-binding energy relationships to enable predictive ligand design, exploring lead-free perovskite systems with enhanced intrinsic stability, and establishing standardized thermal stress testing protocols for reliable comparison across studies. The continued refinement of ligand engineering strategies, guided by fundamental understanding of binding energetics, will undoubtedly accelerate the commercialization of perovskite quantum dot technologies across optoelectronic applications.

Visual Synthesis

Diagram 1: Relationship between ligand binding energy and thermal degradation pathways in perovskite quantum dots.

Diagram 2: Comprehensive experimental workflow for developing and evaluating ligand engineering strategies.

Mitigating Photoluminescence Blinking and Photodarkening

Photoluminescence (PL) blinking and photodarkening present significant challenges in applying perovskite quantum dots (QDs) to quantum light sources, displays, and other optoelectronic devices. These phenomena, primarily driven by surface defects and unstable ligand coverages, lead to fluctuations in emission intensity and eventual photodegradation, thereby limiting device reliability and lifespan [44]. The surface chemistry of perovskite QDs, particularly the choice and engineering of surface ligands, has emerged as a critical frontier in addressing these instability issues. This guide objectively compares the performance of different surface ligand strategies, providing researchers with experimental data and methodologies to inform material selection and synthesis protocols within the broader context of optimizing perovskite QD optoelectronics.

Ligand Engineering Strategies and Performance Comparison

Surface ligands play a pivotal role in determining the photophysical properties of perovskite QDs. They passivate surface defects, influence quantum confinement, and affect charge carrier dynamics. The following strategies have been developed to mitigate blinking and photodarkening.

Ligand Tail Engineering for Solid-State Stability

Traditional ligand designs often prioritize colloidal stability in solution, overlooking their behavior when QDs are immobilized in solid films—the state in most devices. Research indicates that ligand tail engineering is crucial for solid-state photostability.

• Low-Steric Ligands with Attractive Interactions: Using phenethylammonium (PEA) ligands featuring low-steric tails with Ï€-Ï€ stacking interactions promotes a nearly epitaxial ligand layer. This configuration significantly reduces surface energy and enhances passivation stability. Single CsPbBr₃ QDs capped with stacked PEA ligands exhibit nearly non-blinking single-photon emission with ~98% purity and withstand 12 hours of continuous laser operation without photodarkening [44].
• Drawbacks of Bulky Ligands: Ligands like didodecyldimethylammonium bromide (DDABr), while effective in solution, possess bulky aliphatic chains. Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations reveal that high coverages of such ligands increase surface energy in the solid state, making complete, stable passivation energetically unfavorable and leading to defect formation [44].

Table 1: Comparison of Ligand Tail Engineering Strategies

Ligand Type	Chemical Structure	Key Mechanism	Reported Performance	Key Advantages	Key Limitations
Phenethylammonium (PEA) [44]	Aromatic tail group	π-π stacking between ligand tails reduces surface energy	~98% single-photon purity; >12 hours photostability; Nearly non-blinking	Excellent solid-state passivation; High photostability	May require specific synthesis protocols
Didodecylammonium (DDA) [44]	Two long aliphatic chains	Steric hindrance provides colloidal stability	Effective for solution-phase PLQY improvement	Proven solution stability	Poor solid-state passivation; High surface energy
2-Hexyldecanoic Acid (2-HA) [7]	Short, branched chain	Stronger binding affinity than oleic acid; defect passivation	PLQY up to 99%; ASE threshold reduced by 70%	Suppresses Auger recombination; Good reproducibility	--

Binding Affinity and Ligand Equilibrium

The strength of the ligand-QD bond and its resistance to desorption, especially under dilution or operational stresses, is another critical factor.

• Tightly-Binding Ligands: Lecithin, a phospholipid, demonstrates stronger binding affinity to CsPbBr₃ QD surfaces compared to traditional oleic acid/oleylamine (OA/OAm) combinations. Widefield microscopy and change point analysis of hundreds of QDs show lecithin-capped QDs are 7.5 times more likely to be non-blinking and spend 2.5 times longer in their most emissive state. This is attributed to reduced ligand desorption during sample preparation [45].
• Ligand Exchange and Surface Repair: Post-synthetic treatments with alkylamines like oleylamine (OLA) and dodecylamine (DDA) can spontaneously passivate surface defects during ambient storage, boosting relative quantum yield (RQY) to 116% and 126%, respectively. Time-resolved PL (TRPL) shows OLA-passivated QDs exhibit a single decay component, indicating effective passivation, while DDA-passivated samples show biexponential decay, suggesting residual trap states [46].

Complementary and Dual-Functional Ligand Systems

Advanced strategies employ combinations of ligands or molecules with multiple functions to synergistically address different instability pathways.

• Dual-Functional Precursor Ligands: Combining acetate ions (AcO⁻) as a surface ligand with 2-hexyldecanoic acid (2-HA) creates a powerful passivation system. AcO⁻ improves precursor conversion purity and passivates dangling bonds, while 2-HA's stronger binding affinity further suppresses defects and Auger recombination. This approach yields CsPbBr₃ QDs with a 99% PLQY, a narrow emission linewidth of 22 nm, and a 70% reduction in amplified spontaneous emission threshold [7].
• Distinct Roles in Double Perovskites: For lead-free Csâ‚‚NaInCl₆ double perovskite QDs, OA and OAm play separate, critical roles. Studies using FTIR and NMR found that only OAm binds directly to the QD surface, significantly improving PLQY by defect passivation. In contrast, OA does not bind but is crucial for the colloidal stability of the QDs in solution [47].

Table 2: Comparison of Ligand Binding and Combinatorial Strategies

Ligand System	Composition / Type	Key Mechanism	Reported Performance	Key Advantages	Key Limitations
Lecithin [45]	Phospholipid mixture	Strong binding affinity reduces desorption equilibrium	7.5x higher non-blinking probability; 2.5x longer ON-state duration	Superior blinking suppression; Robust against dilution	--
Alkylamines (OLA, DDA) [46]	Long-chain amines	Post-synthetic defect passivation	RQY increased to 116-126%; Single-exponential decay (OLA)	Simple post-treatment; Effective RQY recovery	May introduce slow trap states (e.g., DDA)
Acetate + 2-HA [7]	Dual-functional recipe	Acetate passivates bonds; 2-HA provides strong binding	99% PLQY; 70% lower ASE threshold	High reproducibility; Suppressed Auger recombination	More complex synthesis recipe
OA/OAm in Double Perovskites [47]	Acid-Amine pair	OAm passivates surface defects; OA provides colloidal stability	Improved stability and PLQY for Cs₂NaInCl₆	Clear functional separation	OA may not directly passivate surface

Experimental Protocols and Methodologies

To evaluate and replicate the performance of different ligand strategies, standardized experimental protocols are essential. The following sections detail key methodologies cited in recent literature.

Synthesis of Non-Blinking PEA-Passivated CsPbBr₃ QDs

The synthesis of photostable, non-blinking QDs involves a surface ligand exchange process [44] [48]:

• Base QD Synthesis: Strongly confined CsPbBr₃ QDs are first synthesized using a standard hot-injection method.
• Initial Ligand Treatment: The as-synthesized QDs are treated with n-butylammonium bromide (NBABr) to supply excess ammonium bromides and fill surface halide vacancies.
• PEA Ligand Exchange: The NBABr-treated QDs are then immersed in a saturated solution of phenethylammonium bromide (PEABr) in toluene.
• Thermal Annealing: The mixture is gently heated (e.g., to 50-60°C) for a period (e.g., 30 minutes) to promote the ligand exchange and facilitate the formation of a stacked PEA ligand layer on the QD surface.
• Purification: The resulting PEA-capped QDs are purified via centrifugation and re-dispersed in an anhydrous solvent for film formation or single-dot analysis.

Single Quantum Dot Photostability Measurement

Characterizing photostability and blinking at the single-particle level is crucial for quantum light source applications [44].

• Sample Preparation: QD solutions are spin-coated onto a clean substrate (e.g., silicon wafer with oxide layer) at low density to ensure isolated single QDs for microscopy.
• Optical Setup: A confocal or widefield fluorescence microscope with a high-numerical-aperture objective is used. A continuous-wave laser (e.g., 405 nm) provides excitation.
• Data Acquisition: The PL from individual QDs is collected through a bandpass filter and detected by an avalanche photodiode (APD) or an electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD). Time-trace PL intensity is recorded for extended durations (minutes to hours).
• Data Analysis:
  • Blinking Analysis: Change point analysis is applied to the PL time traces to classify the QDs' emission states (ON, OFF) and calculate ON-state probabilities and duty cycles [45].
  • Photostability Assessment: The total emission time before irreversible photodarkening (e.g., a 50% drop in intensity) is quantified.

Ligand Binding Affinity Assessment

The strength of ligand binding can be evaluated through a combination of experimental and computational techniques [45] [47].

• Dilution Test: QD solutions with different ligand systems are progressively diluted. A significant drop in PLQY upon dilution indicates ligand desorption and weak binding affinity.
• Spectroscopic Characterization:
  • Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR): Identifies specific functional groups and confirms ligand binding to the QD surface by observing shifts in characteristic absorption peaks (e.g., N-H stretch for amines) [47].
  • Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR): Analyzes the chemical environment of ligands. The absence of free ligand peaks in the supernatant after purification confirms binding [47].
• Computational Modeling: Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations model the interaction between ligand molecules and perovskite crystal surfaces (e.g., a CsPbBr₃ slab), providing a theoretical estimate of binding energy and optimal surface coverage [44] [45].

Visualization of Mechanisms and Workflows

Ligand-Defect Interaction and Blinking Mechanism

The following diagram illustrates how surface ligands influence defect-mediated PL blinking and photodarkening in perovskite QDs.

Diagram Title: Ligand-Mediated Defect Passivation and Blinking Mechanisms

Workflow for Ligand Performance Evaluation

This workflow outlines the key steps for synthesizing and characterizing ligand-engineered perovskite QDs.

Diagram Title: Experimental Workflow for Ligand Performance Evaluation

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Reagents and Materials for Ligand Engineering Studies

Reagent/Material	Function/Application	Examples from Research
Phenethylammonium Bromide (PEABr)	Small ligand for solid-state passivation via π-π stacking	Achieving non-blinking, photostable single QDs [44]
Lecithin	Tightly-binding ligand for blinking suppression	7.5x higher non-blinking probability vs. OA/OAm [45]
Oleic Acid (OA) & Oleylamine (OAm)	Standard acid-base pair for colloidal synthesis and stabilization	Baseline ligand system for comparison studies [45] [47]
n-Butylammonium Bromide (NBABr)	Small ligand for initial surface treatment and defect filling	Pre-treatment step before PEA exchange [44]
Didodecyldimethylammonium Bromide (DDABr)	Bulky ligand for solution-phase stability and passivation	Example of sterically hindered ligand [44]
2-Hexyldecanoic Acid (2-HA)	Short branched-chain ligand with strong binding affinity	Part of dual-passivation system for 99% PLQY [7]
Acetate Salts (e.g., CsOAc)	Dual-function precursor; ligand and passivator	Improves precursor purity and passivates surfaces [7]
Alkylamines (DDA, OLA)	Post-synthetic surface passivation agents	Boost RQY via spontaneous defect healing [46]

The mitigation of photoluminescence blinking and photodarkening in perovskite QDs is decisively achieved through advanced surface ligand engineering. This comparison demonstrates that moving beyond traditional bulky ligands to strategies employing low-steric ligands with attractive intermolecular interactions (e.g., PEA), high-binding-affinity molecules (e.g., lecithin, 2-HA), and synergistic multi-ligand systems yields transformative improvements in photostability and emission purity. For researchers, the selection of a ligand strategy must align with the intended application—whether for solution-processed films or solid-state quantum emitters. The experimental protocols and data summarized here provide a roadmap for the development and characterization of next-generation, stable perovskite QD optoelectronic devices.

The pursuit of high-performance and stable perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) for optoelectronic applications has positioned surface ligand engineering as a pivotal research frontier. While the importance of the ligand's head group for binding to the nanocrystal surface is well-established, the strategic design of the ligand's tail has emerged as an equally critical, yet historically underexplored, parameter for achieving exceptional stability and photoluminescence properties. Traditional long-chain ligands, such as oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OAm), provide colloidal stability but introduce significant challenges. Their high steric bulk leads to dynamic binding and facile detachment from the PQD surface, creating unprotected sites vulnerable to environmental degradation and causing detrimental photoluminescence blinking [41] [24].

This review focuses on the paradigm shift towards ligand tail engineering, a strategy that deliberately reduces steric hindrance and promotes the formation of a cohesive, epitaxial-like ligand shell. By designing ligand tails with lower steric demand and incorporating moieties that foster attractive intermolecular interactions, such as π-π stacking, researchers can significantly reduce the surface energy of PQDs. This approach mitigates ligand loss and passivates surface defects more effectively, leading to dramatic improvements in photostability, emission purity, and operational lifetime [49] [48]. This article will objectively compare the performance of emerging low-steric ligands against conventional alternatives, providing a detailed analysis of experimental data and methodologies to guide future research in PQD optoelectronics.

Core Concepts and Mechanistic Insights

The Trade-Off with Traditional Long-Chain Ligands

Long-chain alkyl ligands like OA and OAm are ubiquitous in solution-phase synthesis methods, including hot-injection and ligand-assisted reprecipitation (LARP). They function as steric stabilizers, preventing PQD aggregation during synthesis and in colloidal dispersions [41] [24]. However, their dynamic binding nature and weak coordination to the ionic perovskite surface make them susceptible to detachment under the influence of heat, light, or polar solvents. This detachment creates unsaturated "dangling bonds" on the PQD surface, which act as trap states for charge carriers. These traps are the fundamental cause of several detrimental phenomena, including non-radiative recombination (reducing photoluminescence quantum yield, PLQY), and severe photoluminescence intermittency ("blinking") at the single-particle level [49] [48].

The Principle of Epitaxial Ligand Coverage

The concept of epitaxial ligand coverage moves beyond simple surface passivation to propose the formation of a highly ordered, quasi-crystalline ligand layer around the PQD. This is achieved by designing ligand tails that possess low steric hindrance and the ability to engage in directional intermolecular interactions. A seminal study demonstrated that phenethylammonium ligands, when applied to CsPbBr₃ PQDs, enable this precise outcome [49] [48]. The relatively short and rigid phenethyl tail facilitates close packing on the PQD surface. More importantly, the aromatic rings of adjacent ligands engage in π-π stacking, creating a cohesive, self-assembled shell that is structurally locked in place. This "epitaxial" layer drastically lowers the surface energy of the PQD, resulting in extraordinary properties such as near-non-blinking single-photon emission and the ability to withstand 12 hours of continuous, saturated excitation without photodegradation [49].

The following diagram illustrates the structural and functional differences between the disordered shell formed by traditional ligands and the ordered, epitaxial shell enabled by tailored low-steric ligands.

Experimental Protocols and Performance Data

Key Methodologies for Ligand Tail Engineering

The implementation of ligand tail engineering involves precise synthetic protocols, primarily through post-synthesis ligand exchange.

• Synthesis of CsPbBr₃ PQDs: The foundational PQDs are typically synthesized via the standard hot-injection method. A common procedure involves injecting a Cs-oleate precursor into a hot (e.g., 140-180 °C) solution of PbBrâ‚‚ dissolved in 1-octadecene (ODE) with OA and OAm as coordinating ligands [16] [41]. The resulting OA/OAm-capped PQDs are purified via centrifugation and re-dispersed in a non-polar solvent like hexane or toluene.
• Post-Synthesis Ligand Exchange for Phenethylammonium Bromide (PEAB): The epitaxial coverage strategy is achieved by treating the purified OA/OAm-capped PQDs with a solution of PEAB in a polar solvent, such as ethyl acetate or a butanol/hexane mixture [49] [48]. This process leverages the higher binding affinity of the phenethylammonium cation and induces a phase transfer of the PQDs. The key to success is the Ï€-Ï€ stacking of the ligand tails, which drives the self-assembly of a stable, ordered shell. The exchanged PQDs are then purified to remove excess ligands and by-products.
• Short-Branched-Chain Ligand Integration (2-Hexyldecanoic Acid): An alternative in situ approach involves incorporating ligands like 2-hexyldecanoic acid (2-HA) directly during synthesis. This ligand acts as a replacement for OA. Its short-branched chain offers a stronger binding affinity toward the PQD surface compared to the linear OA, while maintaining sufficient solubility. This method effectively passivates surface defects and suppresses Auger recombination without requiring a separate exchange step [7].

Comparative Performance Data of Ligand Strategies

The table below summarizes quantitative experimental data from recent studies, comparing the performance of engineered ligand tails against traditional and other advanced ligands.

Table 1: Comparative Performance of Engineered Ligand Tails in Perovskite Quantum Dots

Ligand Type	PQD System	Key Performance Metrics	Stability Outcomes	Reference
Phenethylammonium (Low-Steric, π-π Stacking)	CsPbBr₃	~98% single-photon purity; Extraordinary photostability.	>12 hours continuous operation under saturated excitation.	[49] [48]
2-Hexyldecanoic Acid (Short-Branched-Chain)	CsPbBr₃	PLQY: 99%; FWHM: 22 nm; ASE threshold: 0.54 μJ·cm⁻² (70% reduction).	Excellent reproducibility & stability.	[7]
Oleic Acid / Oleylamine (Traditional Long-Chain)	CsPbI₃	Emission: 698-713 nm; FWHM: 24-28 nm.	Pronounced PL decline at 180°C due to phase transition.	[16]
L-Phenylalanine (Ligand Modifier)	CsPbI₃	Enhanced PL intensity; Narrowed FWHM.	Improved phase stability against moisture/heat.	[16]
Zwitterionic Polymers (Matrix Ligand)	CsPbBr₃	Enabled photolithographic patterning of films.	Enhanced stability via ligand/matrix combination.	[41] [24]

The data unequivocally demonstrates that tailored ligand tails directly dictate key optoelectronic properties. The near-unity PLQY and significantly reduced Amplified Spontaneous Emission (ASE) threshold with 2-HA highlight how effective passivation suppresses non-radiative and Auger recombination channels [7]. Furthermore, the transition from traditional OA/OAm to advanced ligands like PEAB and 2-HA directly translates to a fundamental enhancement in operational resilience, a critical metric for commercial device applications.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents for Ligand Tail Engineering

The experimental pursuit of advanced ligand tail engineering requires a specific set of chemical reagents and materials. The following table details essential components for synthesizing and modifying PQDs with engineered ligand shells.

Table 2: Key Research Reagents for Ligand Tail Engineering Experiments

Reagent / Material	Function / Role in Experiment	Key Characteristic / Purpose
Cesium Carbonate (Cs₂CO₃)	Cesium precursor for all-inorganic PQD synthesis.	High purity (>99%) is critical for batch-to-batch reproducibility.
Lead Bromide (PbBrâ‚‚)	Lead and halide source for the perovskite lattice.	Determines the core composition and optical bandgap.
1-Octadecene (ODE)	Non-coordinating solvent for high-temperature synthesis.	Provides a high-boiling-point medium for nanocrystal growth.
Oleic Acid (OA) / Oleylamine (OAm)	Standard long-chain ligands for initial synthesis.	Provide initial colloidal stability but exhibit dynamic binding.
Phenethylammonium Bromide (PEAB)	Post-synthesis ligand for epitaxial coverage.	Aromatic tail enables π-π stacking for a stable, ordered shell.
2-Hexyldecanoic Acid (2-HA)	Short-branched-chain ligand for in situ passivation.	Offers stronger binding affinity than OA to suppress Auger recombination.
Alkyl Phosphonic Acids	Alternative X-type ligand for improved passivation.	Forms a more stable bond with surface Pb atoms compared to carboxylic acids.

The strategic engineering of ligand tails, focused on reducing steric hindrance and promoting epitaxial coverage, represents a transformative advancement in perovskite quantum dot research. The compelling experimental evidence confirms that moving beyond traditional long-chain ligands to designs incorporating low-steric profiles and intermolecular attractive forces directly addresses the chronic instability and blinking problems of PQDs. This approach enables the realization of previously unattainable performance benchmarks, including near-non-blinking single-photon emission, near-unity PLQY, and remarkable photostability required for practical optoelectronic devices and quantum light sources.

Future research directions will likely focus on the exploration of a wider library of tailored ligands, including multidentate and zwitterionic molecules, to further strengthen the ligand-PQD interface. Furthermore, the integration of machine learning with exploratory data analysis, as highlighted in one study, promises to accelerate the optimization of synthesis parameters and ligand ratios, moving the field from empirical discovery to rational design [50]. As ligand engineering continues to mature, its synergy with other optimization strategies, such as interfacial engineering and compositional tuning, will be paramount for unlocking the full commercial potential of perovskite quantum dots in next-generation displays, photovoltaics, and quantum information technologies.

The performance and stability of perovskite quantum dots (QDs) are critically dependent on the organic ligands that cap their surfaces. These ligands not only influence the growth kinetics and morphological properties of the nanocrystals but also play a pivotal role in passivating surface defects, enhancing photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY), and improving environmental stability. Traditional long-chain alkyl ligands like oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OLA) often face challenges related to poor charge transport and dynamic binding characteristics. This comparison guide objectively evaluates three emerging classes of innovative ligands—multidentate, zwitterionic, and short-chain molecules—synthesizing recent experimental data to highlight their respective advantages, limitations, and performance metrics in perovskite quantum dot optoelectronics.

Ligand Classification and Performance Comparison

Performance Metrics of Ligand Classes

Table 1: Comparative performance of innovative ligand classes in perovskite quantum dot applications

Ligand Class	Representative Examples	Key Advantages	Reported PLQY	Stability Improvements	Common Challenges
Multidentate	Sb(SU)₂Cl₃ complex, CA (double-terminal ligand)	Multi-site binding (≥3 sites), deep trap passivation, enhanced crystallinity	~72% (CA ligand) [51]	Superior moisture/thermal stability; Unencapsulated devices: T80=23,325h (dark storage), 5,004h (85°C) [12]	Complex synthesis steps, potential resistive barriers if densely packed [12] [51]
Zwitterionic	TDPS, natural amino acids (Ala, Phe, Trp, Cys)	Lewis base coordination + electrostatic compensation, low cost, readily available	86.5% (TDPS) [51], 87.2% (amino acids) [52]	Enhanced thermal/water resistance; TDPS-QDs retain strong PL after heating to 80°C [52] [51]	May complicate size distribution control, potential conductivity issues [53]
Short-Chain	Propylammonium (PA+), propanediammonium (PDA2+)	Reduced insulating barriers, improved charge transport, structural stabilization	Information Missing	Enhanced moisture resistance vs. 3D perovskites; Improved mechanical properties [54]	Possible reduction in surface passivation efficiency, shorter protective layer [54]

Quantitative Performance Data

Table 2: Experimental data from key studies on ligand-modified perovskite quantum dots

Ligand Type	Specific Ligand	Perovskite System	Key Optical Properties	Stability Performance	Device Application/Efficiency
Zwitterionic	TDPS	CsPbBr₃ QDs	PLQY=86.5%, longer lifetime vs. OA-QDs [51]	Excellent water/thermal/polar solvent stability [51]	Information Missing
Zwitterionic	Tryptophan (Trp)	FAPbBr₃ QDs	High PLQY, emission ~515-530nm [52]	Information Missing	PeLED: EQE=5.6%, Luminance>9000 cd/m² [52]
Multidentate	Sb(SU)₂Cl₃	FAPbI₃ (PVK films)	Information Missing	T80=23,325h (dark), 5,004h (85°C), 5,209h (1-sun illumination) [12]	PSC: PCE=25.03% (fully air-processed) [12]
Short-Chain	PA⁺, PDA²⁺	2D Perovskites (n=2)	Information Missing	Enhanced moisture resistance, improved mechanical properties [54]	Information Missing
Conventional	OA/OLA	CsPbBr₃ NCs	Information Missing	Poor stability in humidity, ligand loss over time [53] [51]	Information Missing

Experimental Protocols and Methodologies

Zwitterionic Ligand Implementation

Amino Acid-Modified FAPbBr₃ QDs (Ultrasonic Synthesis):

• Materials: FAAc (0.75 mmol), Pb(CH₃COO)₂·3Hâ‚‚O (0.2 mmol), OAmBr (0.6 mmol), amino acids (Ala, Phe, Trp, Cys with 1:2 molar ratio of ligand to Pb²⁺), oleic acid (2 mL), n-octane (8 mL) [52].
• Procedure: The mixture is subjected to 7 min of 750 W high-power ultrasonication using a tip-mounted ultrasonicator under air conditions, with the reaction flask placed in an ice-water bath for temperature control. The ultrasonication mode is set to a 3 s on/2 s off cycle. As the reaction progresses, the solution color changes from colorless to yellow-green, indicating successful formation of FAPbBr₃ QDs [52].
• Purification: Centrifuge the crude product at 2000× g for 3 min to remove unreacted precursors. Add ethyl acetate (30 mL, 3:1 volume ratio) to the supernatant, centrifuge at 9000× g for 5 min to collect precipitate. Disperse each precipitate in 2 mL of n-hexane, then add 6 mL of ethyl acetate to each, centrifuge again at 9000× g for 5 min. The final precipitate is redispersed in 2 mL n-hexane and centrifuged at 2000× g for 3 min [52].

TDPS Post-Treatment of CsPbBr₃ QDs:

• Materials: Pre-synthesized OA-capped CsPbBr₃ QDs, TDPS zwitterionic ligand [51].
• Procedure: The TDPS ligand solution is added to the purified OA-QDs solution and stirred for 10 minutes. The resulting TDPS-QDs are purified by adding ethyl acetate and centrifuging at 9000 rpm for 5 minutes [51].

Multidentate Ligand Application

Sb(SU)₂Cl₃ Complex for Perovskite Solar Cells:

• Ligand Synthesis: Antimony chloride reacts with N,N-dimethylselenourea (SU) in dichloromethane to form a Sb(SU)â‚‚Cl₃ complex following previously reported procedures [12].
• Characterization: FTIR spectroscopy shows broad absorption bands at ~3300 cm⁻¹ and ~3200 cm⁻¹ corresponding to N-H stretching vibrations, a strong absorption peak at 1650 cm⁻¹ attributed to N-H bending, and a characteristic Se-Sb vibrational band at 350-300 cm⁻¹, serving as direct evidence of complex formation [12].
• Device Integration: The complex is incorporated into the perovskite precursor solution for two-step fully air-processed PSCs. The crystallization process is controlled through moisture exposure to promote intermediate hydrate phases and regulate ion diffusion kinetics [12].

Short-Chain Spacer Integration

2D Perovskites with Short-Chain Spacers:

• Materials: Propylammonium (PA⁺) for Ruddlesden-Popper (RP) perovskites and propanediammonium (PDA²⁺) for Dion-Jacobson (DJ) perovskites [54].
• Computational Analysis: Density Functional Theory (DFT), ab initio Molecular Dynamics (AIMD) simulations, and Spectroscopic Limited Maximum Efficiency (SLME) method are employed to evaluate the influence of spacer cations on structural properties, thermal stability, mechanical characteristics, optoelectronic properties, Rashba effects, charge transport mechanisms, and photovoltaic performance [54].

Ligand Selection and Optimization Workflow

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key research reagents and their functions in perovskite ligand engineering

Reagent/Category	Function/Role	Application Examples
Amino Acids (Ala, Phe, Trp, Cys)	Zwitterionic ligands providing defect passivation via coordination and electrostatic compensation; programmable side chains enable interface energy level engineering [52]	FAPbBr₃ QDs for green PeLEDs (EQE=5.6%) [52]
Sb(SU)₂Cl₃ Complex	Multidentate passivator binding four adjacent sites via 2Se+2Cl atoms; forms extended hydrogen-bonding network [12]	Fully air-processed PSCs (PCE=25.03%) with exceptional stability [12]
Short-Chain Spacers (PA⁺, PDA²⁺)	Reduce insulating barriers between conductive inorganic sheets; enhance charge transport while maintaining 2D stability [54]	2D perovskite solar cells with improved moisture resistance [54]
TDPS Zwitterion	Post-treatment ligand replacing OA; strong affinity to QD surface enhances stability and PLQY [51]	CsPbBr₃ QDs with high PLQY (86.5%) and thermal stability [51]
OA/OLA System	Conventional binary ligand system for nanocrystal growth control and surface passivation [53]	Reference material for comparing innovative ligand performance [53] [51]
Emulsion LARP System	Room-temperature synthesis method using hexane/DMSO/water with controlled demulsification [53]	Platform for testing ligand effects on CsPbBr₃ NC growth kinetics [53]

The strategic selection of surface ligands represents a critical design parameter in perovskite quantum dot optoelectronics. Multidentate ligands like the Sb(SU)₂Cl₃ complex offer exceptional stability through multi-site binding, making them ideal for demanding operational environments. Zwitterionic ligands, particularly amino acids, provide an optimal balance of defect passivation, cost-effectiveness, and processability, achieving high PLQY values exceeding 87%. Short-chain spacers significantly enhance charge transport in 2D perovskite structures while maintaining reasonable environmental stability. The choice between these ligand strategies ultimately depends on the specific application requirements, with multidentate systems favoring extreme stability needs, zwitterionic ligands balancing multiple performance metrics, and short-chain molecules prioritizing charge transport efficiency. Future research directions should explore hybrid approaches that combine the advantages of these ligand classes while addressing their individual limitations through molecular engineering.

Comparative Analysis and Validation of Ligand Strategies Across PQD Systems

Surface ligand engineering is a pivotal strategy in perovskite quantum dot (PQD) research for optimizing the performance of optoelectronic devices. Ligands directly influence the photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY), charge transport, and ultimate device efficiency by modifying the nanocrystal surface chemistry, which governs defect passivation, energy level alignment, and inter-dot coupling. This guide provides an objective comparison of performance metrics achieved by different surface ligand strategies, contextualized within the broader thesis that rational ligand design is fundamental to unlocking the commercial potential of PQDs in light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and other optoelectronic applications.

Quantitative Performance Comparison of Ligand Strategies

The following tables summarize key performance metrics reported for different surface ligand modifications in perovskite quantum dot light-emitting diodes (QLEDs) and solar cells.

Table 1: Performance Metrics of Perovskite QLEDs with Different Surface Ligands

Perovskite Material	Ligand Strategy	PLQY (%)	Device EQE (%)	Operational Stability (Tâ‚…â‚€)	Key Metrics
CsPbI₃ QDs [55]	2-naphthalene sulfonic acid (NSA) & NH₄PF₆ exchange	94	26.04	729 min @ 1000 cd/m²	Pure-red emission @ 628 nm; Max luminance: 4,203 cd/m²
CsPbI₃ QDs [56]	Bidentate molecule PZPY	94	26.0	10,587 hours @ 190 mW sr⁻¹ m²	Emission @ 686 nm; High storability
Green-Emitting PQDs [11]	Ionic liquid [BMIM]OTF	97.1 (solution)	20.94	131.87 h (L₀ = 100 cd/m²)	Ultrafast EL response: 700 ns; Brightness: 170,000 cd/m²
CsPbI₃ PQDs [16]	Trioctylphosphine (TOP)/L-Phenylalanine	~95	Data not specified	Data not specified	Enhanced phase stability; Narrow FWHM (~25 nm)
Double Perovskite QDs [57]	Short-chain ligands	Data not specified	0.86	Data not specified	Record for double perovskite QD-based LEDs

Table 2: Performance of Perovskite Quantum Dot Solar Cells

Device Type	Active Material	Ligand / Passivation Strategy	Power Conversion Efficiency (%)	Key Metrics
Flexible PQD Solar Cell [58]	Lead Iodide PQDs (MA/FA)	Alkali-augmented antisolvent hydrolysis (AAAH) with Methyl Benzoate	18.3 (certified champion)	Scalable; 1 cm² devices achieved 15.60%
Tin-Based Perovskite Solar Cell [59]	Tin-Based Perovskite	Colloidal chemical strategy with Caesium	16.65 (certified)	Lead-free; Enhanced film quality and stability

Detailed Experimental Protocols for Key Ligand Strategies

Inhibition of Ostwald Ripening with Strong-Binding Ligands

The synthesis of high-quality, strongly confined CsPbI₃ QDs involves a multi-step ligand exchange process designed to suppress Ostwald ripening and passivate surface defects [55].

• Workflow Overview:

• Step-by-Step Procedure:

  • Initial QD Synthesis: CsPbI₃ QDs are synthesized via the standard hot-injection method using oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OAm) as initial capping ligands [55].
  • NSA Ligand Treatment: After nucleation, a 0.6 M solution of 2-naphthalene sulfonic acid (NSA) in chlorobenzene is injected into the reaction mixture. NSA, with a higher dissociation constant than OA, promotes a proton transfer reaction that removes weakly bound OA/OAm ligands from the QD surface [55].
  • Surface Binding: The sulfonic acid group of NSA strongly binds to surface Pb²⁺ atoms (DFT-calculated binding energy: 1.45 eV, higher than OAm's 1.23 eV), passivating surface defects and providing steric hindrance from its naphthalene ring to inhibit QD overgrowth [55].
  • Purification with NHâ‚„PF₆: During purification, ammonium hexafluorophosphate (NHâ‚„PF₆) is introduced. The PF₆⁻ anions exhibit extremely strong binding to the QD surface (DFT-calculated binding energy: 3.92 eV), further passivating defects and replacing residual long-chain insulating ligands. This significantly enhances the charge transport between QDs [55].

• Characterization Methods: In-situ photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy tracks PL evolution during synthesis. TEM analyzes QD size and distribution. FTIR, XPS, and ¹H-NMR confirm ligand binding. Time-resolved PL (TRPL) measures carrier lifetime [55].

Ionic Liquid Treatment for Enhanced Crystallinity and Charge Injection

This strategy uses ionic liquids to modulate QD growth and improve interfacial properties in PeLEDs [11].

• Workflow Overview:

• Step-by-Step Procedure:

  • In-situ Crystallization: The ionic liquid 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium Trifluoromethanesulfonate ([BMIM]OTF) is dissolved in chlorobenzene and added to the lead bromide precursor solution before QD synthesis [11].
  • Size and Crystallinity Control: The [BMIM]+ cations coordinate with [PbBr₃]⁻ octahedra, forming a complex that slows down nucleation due to steric hindrance from the imidazole ring. This promotes the growth of larger QDs (average size increase from 8.84 nm to 11.34 nm) with enhanced crystallinity, particularly along the (200) crystal plane [11].
  • Surface Passivation: The OTF⁻ anions strongly bind to surface Pb²⁺ sites. Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations confirm a higher binding energy for OTF⁻ (-1.49 eV) compared to original octanoic acid (OTAC) ligands (-0.95 eV), leading to superior defect passivation [11].
  • Device Fabrication: Ultra-high-resolution PeLEDs (9072 PPI) are fabricated with a reduced active area to minimize the capacitance effect, contributing to a nanosecond-scale response time [11].

• Characterization Methods: TEM and XRD analyze size, morphology, and crystallinity. PLQY measurements quantify emission efficiency. TRPL and DFT calculations probe carrier dynamics and binding energies. Electroluminescence (EL) response time is directly measured under pulsed operation [11].

Bidentate Molecule Strategy for Ripening Control and Stability

A ripening control strategy focuses on maintaining surface integrity throughout the QD lifecycle [56].

• Step-by-Step Procedure:

  • Post-Synthesis Treatment: The bidentate molecule 2-(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)pyridine (PZPY) is added directly to the colloidal solution of CsPbI₃ QDs (synthesized with OA/OAm) [56].
  • Surface Stabilization: PZPY's molecular flexibility allows its two nitrogen sites to chelate uncoordinated Pb²⁺ on the QD surface without significant steric hindrance. This strong interaction reduces surface energy and prevents Oswald ripening and secondary growth during purification, film formation, and storage [56].
  • Defect Suppression: By inhibiting ripening, the formation of interface fusion, grain boundaries, and dislocations is suppressed, leading to a dense, smooth QD film with superior surface morphology [56].

• Characterization Methods: Aberration-corrected STEM visualizes surface defects and ripening inhibition. FTIR and XPS confirm surface chemical states. PLQY and TRPL evaluate optical properties. Device lifetime is tested under constant operation [56].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Reagents for Perovskite Quantum Dot Ligand Engineering

Reagent / Material	Function / Role in Research	Key Outcome / Purpose
2-Naphthalene Sulfonic Acid (NSA) [55]	Strong-binding acidic ligand for surface passivation	Inhibits Ostwald ripening; replaces weak OA/OAm ligands; enhances PLQY and stability.
Ammonium Hexafluorophosphate (NH₄PF₆) [55]	Inorganic ligand for purification	Exchanges long-chain ligands; passivates defects; improves inter-dot charge transport.
Ionic Liquid [BMIM]OTF [11]	Additive for in-situ crystallization control	Promotes QD growth & crystallinity; reduces defect density & charge injection barrier.
Bidentate Molecule PZPY [56]	Ripening inhibitor and stabilizer	Chelates surface Pb²⁺; prevents QD aggregation & ripening during storage and processing.
Methyl Benzoate (MeBz) [58]	Antisolvent for ligand exchange	Enables adequate ligand exchange without damaging perovskite core; used in solar cells.
Trioctylphosphine (TOP) / L-Phenylalanine [16]	Ligand system for CsPbI₃ PQDs	Enhances phase stability and optical properties of red-emitting PQDs.
Short-Chain Ligands [57]	Ligands for conductive films	Replaces long-chain insulating ligands; reduces hole-injection barrier in LED devices.

The experimental data and performance metrics compiled in this guide demonstrate that surface ligand engineering is a critical determinant in the performance of perovskite quantum dot optoelectronic devices. Strategies employing strong-binding multidentate ligands, ionic liquids, and short conductive ligands consistently outperform conventional OA/OAm systems in PLQY, charge transport, and device efficiency and stability. The choice of ligand strategy must be aligned with the specific application targets, whether it be ultra-high brightness and speed for displays, record efficiency for solar cells, or exceptional operational stability for commercial viability. Future research will likely focus on developing increasingly sophisticated ligand systems that combine the benefits of robust passivation, excellent charge mobility, and long-term environmental and operational stability.

In perovskite quantum dot (PQD) optoelectronics, surface ligands are not merely passive stabilizers; they actively dictate key performance parameters, including charge transport, defect passivation, and environmental stability [16] [60]. The choice of ligand affects the quantum dot's size, its electronic structure, and the nature of the resulting solid film, creating a complex structure-property relationship that demands rigorous characterization [60] [7]. A comprehensive validation strategy is therefore essential to move beyond simple performance correlations and establish definitive causal links. This guide compares three powerful characterization techniques—in-situ X-ray Diffraction (XRD), Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy, and Single-Dot Spectroscopy—detailing their respective capabilities in elucidating the effects of surface ligand engineering on PQDs. We provide objective experimental data and standardized protocols to guide researchers in selecting and applying these techniques to their ligand-optimization workflows.

Comparative Analysis of Characterization Techniques

The following table summarizes the core functionalities, strengths, and limitations of each technique for analyzing ligand effects on PQDs.

Table 1: Technique Comparison for Ligand Analysis in Perovskite QDs

Technique	Primary Information	Key Ligand-Specific Insights	Strengths	Limitations
In-situ XRD [61] [62]	Crystal structure, phase purity, phase transitions under reaction conditions.	Ligand-induced lattice strain/stress, phase stability under environmental stress (heat, light).	Probes average structure of the sample; quantitative; can track kinetics of phase changes.	Limited surface sensitivity; indirect information on ligand binding.
FTIR [63] [64]	Molecular vibrations, chemical bonding, functional group identification.	Ligand binding mode (e.g., chelating, monodentate), surface coverage, chemical changes during degradation.	Directly probes molecular identity of surface ligands; various sampling modes (ATR, transmission).	Challenging for pure metals; complex data interpretation for mixed ligands.
Single-Dot Spectroscopy [60] [7]	Photoluminescence (PL) intensity, lifetime, emission energy of individual QDs.	Homogeneity of ligand passivation, single-dot quantum yield, identification of trap states, spectral diffusion.	Reveals single-dot heterogeneity masked in ensemble measurements; direct probe of optical performance.	Technically demanding; low throughput; requires sophisticated instrumentation.

Detailed Experimental Protocols and Data Interpretation

In-situ X-ray Diffraction (XRD)

Objective: To monitor ligand-dependent phase stability and structural evolution of CsPbI₃ PQDs under thermal stress.

• Sample Preparation: Deposit a thin, uniform film of CsPbI₃ PQDs (passivated with different ligands, e.g., oleic acid vs. 2-hexyldecanoic acid) onto a low-background substrate like a silicon wafer [7].
• Experimental Setup: Use a diffractometer equipped with an environmental chamber (e.g., a heated stage). A typical configuration is the Rigaku Smartlab, which allows for high-resolution measurements with temperature control [62].
• Data Acquisition:
  • Set the X-ray source (e.g., Cu Kα) and configure the optics for parallel-beam geometry to minimize substrate interference.
  • Acquire a baseline XRD pattern at room temperature (e.g., 25°C) over a 2θ range of 10°-50°.
  • Initiate a temperature ramp (e.g., from 25°C to 180°C at 5°C/min) while collecting sequential XRD scans (e.g., one scan every 10°C) [61].
  • Correlate the diffraction data with the sample's photoluminescence (PL) to link structural and optical changes [16].

Data Interpretation:

• Phase Identification: Identify the crystalline phase (e.g., cubic γ-CsPbI₃ or orthorhombic δ-CsPbI₃) by matching peak positions to reference patterns.
• Stability Analysis: The temperature at which the peak corresponding to the photoactive cubic phase (e.g., ~20.5° 2θ) diminishes and the peak for the non-perovskite phase (e.g., ~12.5° 2θ) appears is the phase transition temperature. Ligands that impart higher stability will show a higher transition temperature.
• Lattice Strain: Small shifts in peak positions can indicate ligand-induced lattice strain. Calculate the lattice parameter to quantify this effect.

Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy

Objective: To confirm ligand binding to the PQD surface and identify the chemical nature of the interaction.

• Sample Preparation: For attenuated total reflectance (ATR)-FTIR, use purified and concentrated PQD solutions. Drop-cast the solution onto the ATR crystal and evaporate the solvent to form a thin film [64]. Analyze ligand precursors and purified QDs separately as controls.
• Experimental Setup: Use an FTIR spectrometer (e.g., Thermo Scientific) with an ATR accessory. Collect spectra typically over the mid-IR range (4000-400 cm⁻¹) with a resolution of 4 cm⁻¹ [62] [64].
• Data Acquisition:
  • Acquire a background spectrum with a clean ATR crystal.
  • Place the PQD film on the crystal and measure the sample spectrum.
  • Repeat for all ligand-modified PQD samples and pure ligand controls under identical conditions.

Data Interpretation:

• Binding Mode: Compare the spectra of free ligands and bound ligands. A shift in the carboxylate (-COO⁻) stretching vibrations (from ~1700 cm⁻¹ for free acid to ~1400-1550 cm⁻¹ for bound carboxylate) indicates binding to the Pb²⁺ sites on the QD surface [7]. The separation between the asymmetric and symmetric stretching peaks can distinguish between monodentate and bidentate/chelating binding [8].
• Surface Coverage: The relative intensity of ligand-specific peaks (e.g., C-H stretches at ~2900 cm⁻¹) can be semi-quantitatively compared across samples to estimate surface coverage.
• Ligand Decomposition: The appearance of new peaks or disappearance of existing ones after environmental stressing can reveal ligand degradation pathways.

Table 2: Key FTIR Vibrational Modes for Common Perovskite QD Ligands

Functional Group / Vibration	Typical Wavenumber (cm⁻¹)	Interpretation in PQD Context
O-H Stretch	3200-3600	Presence of water or alcohols (can indicate incomplete purification).
C-H Stretch	2800-3000	Confirms presence of organic alkyl chains on ligands.
C=O Stretch (carboxylic acid)	~1700	Presence of unbound, protonated oleic acid.
Asymmetric COO⁻ Stretch	1500-1600	Signature of carboxylate group bound to metal (Pb) site.
Symmetric COO⁻ Stretch	1350-1450	Used with asymmetric stretch to determine binding mode.
N-H Bend (ammonium)	~1500-1580	Can indicate binding of alkylammonium ligands.

Single-Dot Spectroscopy

Objective: To probe the heterogeneity in photophysical properties among individual ligand-passivated PQDs, which is obscured in ensemble measurements.

• Sample Preparation: Dilute the PQD solution significantly (to pico- or nanomolar concentration) and spin-coat onto a clean, inert substrate (e.g., fused silica) to ensure spatially isolated dots [60].
• Experimental Setup: Use a confocal microscope equipped with a high-numerical-aperture objective (e.g., 100x, NA > 1.0), a sensitive detector (e.g., an avalanche photodiode or EMCCD), and a spectrograph. A pulsed laser source is required for lifetime measurements.
• Data Acquisition:
  • Locate Single Dots: Raster-scan the sample to create a fluorescence map. Identify bright, isolated spots.
  • PL Spectroscopy: For each spot, collect the full emission spectrum to determine the emission maximum and linewidth (FWHM).
  • Time-Resolved PL (TRPL): Use time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) on a single dot to measure its PL lifetime. This reveals recombination dynamics and trap states.
  • Intensity Traces: Record the PL intensity of a single dot over time (seconds to minutes) to assess spectral diffusion and "blinking" behavior [7].

Data Interpretation:

• Emission Homogeneity: A narrow distribution of emission energies from dot-to-dot indicates uniform quantum confinement, often a result of effective ligand passivation producing a narrow size distribution.
• Non-Radiative Recombination: A shorter average PL lifetime and a higher contribution of fast-decay components in TRPL data suggest the presence of surface traps. Ligands that effectively passivate these traps will yield dots with longer, more mono-exponential decays.
• Stability Metrics: Reduced "blinking" and less spectral diffusion (jumps in emission energy) in intensity traces are hallmarks of superior surface passivation and local environment stability provided by the ligand shell.

Visualizing Characterization Workflows and Ligand Effects

The following diagrams illustrate the experimental workflow and the specific ligand effects probed by each technique.

Diagram 1: Multi-technique Characterization Workflow

Diagram 2: Ligand Effects and Probing Techniques

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Key Reagents for Ligand Studies on Perovskite QDs

Reagent / Material	Function / Role in Experiment	Example from Literature
Cesium Carbonate (Cs₂CO₃)	Cesium precursor for all-inorganic CsPbX₃ QD synthesis.	Used in hot-injection synthesis of CsPbI₃ PQDs [16].
Lead Iodide (PbI₂)	Lead and halide precursor for APbX₃ QD synthesis.	Standard precursor for CsPbI₃ PQDs [16].
1-Octadecene (ODE)	High-boiling, non-coordinating solvent for hot-injection synthesis.	Common solvent providing high-temperature reaction medium [16].
Oleic Acid (OA)	Common surface ligand (carboxylate binding group); passivates surface, promotes dispersion.	Standard ligand, often compared to modified ligands like 2-hexyldecanoic acid [7].
Oleylamine (OAm)	Common surface ligand (ammonium binding group); passivates surface, promotes dispersion.	Co-ligand used alongside OA in many synthesis protocols [60].
2-Hexyldecanoic Acid (2-HA)	Short-branched-chain ligand with stronger binding affinity than OA.	Enhanced passivation and suppressed Auger recombination in CsPbBr₃ QDs [7].
Acetate Salts (e.g., CsOAc)	Dual-function precursor/ligand; improves precursor conversion and passivates surfaces.	Acetate (AcO⁻) increased cesium precursor purity to 98.59% and acted as a surface ligand [7].
Trioctylphosphine Oxide (TOPO)	Polar coordinating solvent and ligand; can modify growth kinetics and passivate surfaces.	Used as a ligand modifier in the synthesis of CsPbI₃ PQDs [16].

Colloidal lead halide perovskite quantum dots (PQDs), particularly all-inorganic cesium lead halide (CsPbX3) variants, have emerged as a revolutionary class of semiconducting nanomaterials due to their exceptional optoelectronic properties. These include bright photoluminescence with narrow spectral linewidths, easily tunable bandgaps, and high charge carrier mobility [65] [66]. However, the ionic nature and dynamic surface of these QDs make their properties and stability heavily dependent on the coordinated ligand species [65] [44]. Ligands serve as the primary interface between the QD and its environment, governing colloidal stability, defect passivation, charge transport, and ultimately, device performance.

For years, the combination of oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OAm) has been the conventional ligand system used in both hot-injection and room-temperature syntheses of PQDs [67] [66]. Nevertheless, their labile binding often leads to ligand loss and subsequent degradation. Recently, advanced ligand systems such as phenethylammonium bromide (PEABr) and didodecyldimethylammonium bromide (DDABr) have been developed to address these shortcomings [44]. This guide provides an objective, data-driven comparison of these ligand systems, offering researchers a clear framework for selection and application in perovskite optoelectronics.

Ligand Characteristics and Binding Mechanisms

Understanding the fundamental structure and binding mode of each ligand is crucial for interpreting their performance.

Conventional System: Oleic Acid & Oleylamine (OA/OAm)

• Composition and Form: This system typically uses a mixture of oleic acid (carboxylic acid) and oleylamine (primary amine) in a non-polar solvent [67].
• Binding Dynamics: The binding is highly dynamic. Oleylamine often binds as oleylammonium bromide in an NC(X)2 motif, while oleic acid can bind in the form of oleylammonium oleate, especially in the presence of excess amine [65].
• Surface Interaction: The native OA/OAm ligands are fluxional, constantly associating and dissociating from the QD surface. This results in a broad distribution of binding states, including chemisorbed, physisorbed (entangled in the ligand shell), and free ligands [65].
• Surface Density: The individual surface densities for oleate and oleylammonium ligands are typically in the range of 1.2–1.7 nm⁻², leading to an overall ligand density of 2.4–3.0 ligands nm⁻² [65].

Advanced Ligand Systems

• Phenethylammonium Bromide (PEABr): This ligand features a small ammonium head group for binding and a phenethyl tail that enables attractive Ï€-Ï€ stacking between adjacent molecules.
• Didodecyldimethylammonium Bromide (DDABr): This is a quaternary ammonium surfactant with two long aliphatic chains and a permanent positive charge [44].

Table 1: Fundamental Characteristics of Ligand Systems

Ligand System	Chemical Class	Primary Binding Group	Key Tail Group Feature	Binding Character
OA/OAm	Carboxylic Acid/Primary Amine	Carboxylate/Ammonium	Long, aliphatic (C18) chains	Dynamic, labile, fluxional
PEABr	Aromatic Ammonium Salt	Ammonium	Phenyl group (Ï€-Ï€ stacking)	Dense, stable, epitaxial-like
DDABr	Quaternary Ammonium Salt	Quaternary Ammonium	Two aliphatic (C12) chains	Strong electrostatic, halide vacancy healing

The following diagram illustrates the conceptual differences in how these ligands pack on a QD surface and their impact on surface energy.

Diagram 1: Conceptual framework of ligand surface packing and its consequences. The bulky, dynamic OA/OAm system leads to high surface energy and defects, while the π-π stacking in PEABr promotes a stable, low-energy surface.

Comparative Performance Analysis

The fundamental differences in ligand binding translate directly into measurable disparities in optical performance and stability.

Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY) and Lifetime

• OA/OAm System: PQDs capped with OA/OAm typically exhibit shorter photoluminescence lifetimes. For example, CsPbBr3 NCs with OA/OAm have shown an average lifetime (Ï„av) of 1.167 ns [67] [68]. This shorter lifetime suggests a higher prevalence of non-radiative recombination pathways due to insufficient surface passivation.
• PEABr System: Ligand engineering with PEABr can lead to significantly longer exciton lifetimes. The dense, stable passivation reduces trap-assisted recombination, a crucial factor for high-purity single-photon emission [44].
• Alkyl Chain Length (Generically): Studies on alkylamine ligands show that increasing ligand hydrophobicity and length (e.g., from C6 to C16) can shorten the average exciton lifetime from 144.6 ns to 8.2 ns, while simultaneously increasing the thin-film PLQY from 89% to 100% due to dielectric confinement and aggregation-induced emission effects [60].

Photostability and Blinking Suppression

• OA/OAm System: PQDs, especially strongly confined ones, capped with traditional ligands suffer severely from photoluminescence intermittency (blinking) and photodarkening under continuous illumination. This is linked to photoionization and non-radiative Auger recombination from surface defects [44].
• PEABr System: CsPbBr3 QDs thoroughly exchanged with PEA ligands exhibit nearly non-blinking single-photon emission with high purity (~98%). Most notably, they demonstrate extraordinary photostability, maintaining their emission characteristics under 12 hours of continuous laser irradiation and saturated excitations [44]. This stability is attributed to the significant reduction in QD surface energy enabled by the Ï€-Ï€ stacking of PEA ligands.

Thermodynamic Binding Strength

Quantitative NMR studies provide direct insight into the thermodynamics of ligand exchange.

• OA/OAm Equilibrium: The binding of native OA/OAm ligands is a dynamic equilibrium, with a bound fraction typically ranging between 20–30% of the total ligand present in the system [65].
• Exchange with Carboxylic Acids: 10-Undecenoic acid undergoes an exergonic (spontaneous) exchange equilibrium with bound oleate, with an equilibrium constant Keq = 1.97 at 25°C [65].
• Exchange with Amines: Undec-10-en-1-amine also exergonically exchanges with bound oleylamine, with a slightly higher Keq = 2.52 at 25°C [65].
• Phosphonic Acids: In contrast, 10-undecenylphosphonic acid undergoes an irreversible ligand exchange, indicating a much stronger binding affinity to the PQD surface [65].

Table 2: Experimental Optical and Stability Performance Data

Performance Metric	OA/OAm System	PEABr System	Experimental Conditions & Notes
PL Lifetime (Ï„av)	1.167 ns [67]	>3.228 ns (with OO) [67]	Measured for CsPbBr3 NCs; value for PEA is indicative of improved passivation.
Photostability	Degrades under illumination [44]	Stable for >12 hrs continuous operation [44]	Single QD level, strong laser excitation.
PL Blinking	Ubiquitous, severe in small QDs [44]	Nearly non-blinking [44]	Single QD level.
Binding Strength (Keq)	Reference state (Keq = 1)	N/A	Exchange with incoming ligands measured [65].
Surface Ligand Density	2.4 - 3.0 ligands nm⁻² [65]	Near-epitaxial coverage [44]	Calculated for oleate + dodecylammonium.

Experimental Protocols for Ligand Exchange and Study

To ensure reproducibility, below are detailed methodologies for key experiments cited in this guide.

Protocol: Quantitative Analysis of Ligand Exchange via ¹H NMR

This method allows for the quantification of free and bound ligand fractions to determine exchange thermodynamics [65].

• QD Synthesis & Purification: Synthesize CsPbBr3 QDs using a modified hot-injection method with diphenyl ether as the solvent to avoid NMR spectral overlap. Purify the QDs without adding excess ligands after purification.
• Titration Experiment: Titrate a solution of the incoming ligand (e.g., 10-undecenoic acid) into a suspension of purified CsPbBr3 QDs in toluene-d8.
• NMR Acquisition: After each titration, acquire a solution ¹H NMR spectrum, focusing on the diagnostic alkenyl region (δ = 5.4–5.9 ppm).
• Quantification: Resolve and integrate the peaks corresponding to the bound and free states of both the native and incoming ligands. Use an internal standard (e.g., ferrocene) for concentration quantification.
• Data Analysis: Calculate the equilibrium constant (Keq) for the ligand exchange by quantifying the bound and free fractions over the titration series. The average Keq for 10-undecenoic acid exchanging with oleate is 1.97 ± 0.10 at 25°C [65].

Protocol: Solid-State Ligand Exchange with PEABr for Photostable QDs

This protocol describes the post-synthetic treatment to achieve non-blinking, photostable QDs [44].

• Initial QD Synthesis: Synthesize strongly confined CsPbBr3 QDs using standard HI or LARP methods with initial OA/OAm ligands.
• Initial Surface Treatment: First, treat the QDs with an excess of small-sized ligands like n-butylammonium bromide (NBABr) to initially passivate surface sites and fill halide vacancies.
• PEABr Exchange: Immerse the NBABr-treated QDs in a saturated solution of PEABr. This step is critical for introducing the Ï€-Ï€ stacking ligands.
• Heat-Assisted Annealing: Apply mild heating to promote the ligand exchange process and the formation of a stable, stacked ligand layer on the QD surface.
• Purification and Solid-Film Formation: Purify the exchanged QDs and deposit them as a thin film for single-dot spectroscopy. The resulting QDs show suppressed blinking and high photostability.

The workflow for achieving photostable QDs through ligand engineering is summarized below.

Diagram 2: A simplified workflow for creating photostable perovskite quantum dots via a two-step ligand exchange process.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Reagents for Perovskite Quantum Dot Ligand Studies

Reagent/Ligand	Typical Function in Research	Key Consideration
Oleic Acid (OA)	Proton scavenger; binds as oleate; standard ligand for colloidal stability.	Binding is dynamic and weak; prone to desorption.
Oleylamine (OAm)	Lewis base; binds as oleylammonium; standard ligand for colloidal stability.	Often forms ion pairs with oleate; excess can alter binding mode [65].
Phenethylammonium Bromide (PEABr)	Advanced ligand for solid-state photostability and blinking suppression.	Aromatic tail enables π-π stacking, crucial for low surface energy [44].
Didodecyldimethylammonium Bromide (DDABr)	Quaternary ammonium surfactant for surface passivation.	Two long chains may limit surface coverage density in solid state [44].
n-Butylammonium Bromide (NBABr)	Small ligand for initial surface treatment and defect passivation.	Used as a preparatory step for more advanced ligand systems [44].
10-Undecenoic Acid	Model carboxylic acid ligand for thermodynamic NMR studies.	Terminal vinyl group provides spectroscopically distinct NMR signal [65].

The transition from the conventional OA/OAm system to advanced ligands like PEABr and DDABr represents a significant leap in perovskite quantum dot research. While OA/OAm is sufficient for basic synthesis and achieving initial colloidal stability, its dynamic and labile binding is a fundamental limitation for high-performance, stable optoelectronic devices.

In contrast, advanced ligand systems offer a paradigm shift. PEABr, with its small size and ability to form a densely packed, stable layer via π-π stacking, directly addresses the core issues of surface energy and defect formation. This results in unprecedented improvements in photostability and the suppression of PL blinking, which are critical for applications in quantum light sources and high-fidelity displays [44]. The quantitative thermodynamic data available for ligand exchange provides a scientific foundation for predicting and designing even more effective ligand chemistries in the future [65].

For researchers, the choice of ligand system must be aligned with the application:

• For exploratory synthesis and fundamental solution-based studies, the OA/OAm system remains a viable starting point.
• For solid-state devices requiring high operational stability, such as LEDs and single-photon sources, the adoption of advanced, rationally designed ligands like PEABr is no longer optional but essential.

Future research will likely focus on designing novel ligand architectures that combine multiple favorable traits, such as strong anchoring groups, conductive backbones, and steric tails that promote intermolecular attraction, to further push the boundaries of PQD performance and durability.

The operational lifetime and environmental resilience of perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) remain significant bottlenecks hindering their commercial adoption in optoelectronics. While PQDs possess exceptional optoelectronic properties, including high photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) and tunable bandgaps, their inherent susceptibility to degradation under environmental stressors like moisture, oxygen, heat, and prolonged illumination severely restricts practical applications [16]. Surface ligand engineering has emerged as a pivotal strategy to enhance PQD stability without compromising their electronic properties. This review provides a systematic comparison of recent advances in surface ligand modifications, assessing their efficacy in improving the long-term stability of PQDs against environmental and operational stresses, framed within the broader thesis that rational ligand design is paramount to unlocking the commercial potential of perovskite optoelectronics.

Comparative Analysis of Ligand Strategies and Stability Performance

The table below summarizes key findings from recent studies on different ligand treatments and their impact on PQD stability and performance.

Table 1: Comparison of Surface Ligand Strategies for Perovskite Quantum Dot Stability

Perovskite Material	Ligand Strategy	Key Stability & Performance Findings	Experimental Stress Conditions	Reference
CsPbI3 PQDs	Ligand passivation using L-PHE, TOP, and TOPO	Improved phase stability; optimized PL intensity and narrow FWHM at 170°C synthesis temperature	Thermal stress during synthesis (140-180°C)	[16]
CsPbBr3 QDs	Novel cesium precursor with acetate (AcO⁻) and 2-hexyldecanoic acid (2-HA)	PLQY of 99%; enhanced homogeneity and reproducibility; 70% reduction in ASE threshold	Room-temperature stability and optical pumping	[7]
CsPbBr3 QDs	Ionic liquid [BMIM]OTF	EQE improved from 7.57% to 20.94%; T50 lifetime increased from 8.62 h to 131.87 h (at L0 = 100 cd/m²)	Operational lifetime testing under electrical driving	[11]
Cs2NaInCl6 Double PQDs	Oleylamine (OAm) and Oleic Acid (OA) in varying ratios	OAm passivates surface defects, boosting PLQY; OA is crucial for colloidal stability during storage	Ambient storage conditions; optical characterization	[47]
CsPbBr3 QDs	Lecithin (zwitterionic) vs. OA/OAm	Lecithin-capped QDs were 7.5x more likely to be non-blinking and spent 2.5x longer in emissive state	Single-particle microscopy under continuous illumination	[69]

Interpretation of Comparative Data

The data reveals that ligand functionality extends beyond simple surface capping. Oleylamine (OAm) is frequently identified as critical for passivating surface defects, thereby enhancing PLQY, while oleic acid (OA) plays a more dominant role in maintaining colloidal stability [47]. The superior performance of multidentate ligands like lecithin and ionic liquids like [BMIM]OTF highlights the importance of strong binding affinity and effective defect passivation in mitigating degradation under operational stresses, leading to order-of-magnitude improvements in operational lifetime [11] [69]. Furthermore, innovative precursor engineering, as demonstrated with acetate and 2-HA, can significantly improve batch-to-batch reproducibility—a critical factor for industrial-scale manufacturing [7].

Experimental Protocols for Stability Assessment

To generate the comparative data presented, standardized yet rigorous experimental protocols are employed. The following section details the key methodologies used in the cited works for synthesizing PQDs and subjecting them to environmental and operational stress tests.

Synthesis of Perovskite Quantum Dots

Protocol 1: Hot-Injection Method for CsPbI<sub>3</sub> PQDs [16] [2]

• Principle: Rapid injection of a precursor into a high-temperature solvent to induce instantaneous nucleation and controlled growth.
• Detailed Workflow:
  • Precursor Preparation: Cesium carbonate (Csâ‚‚CO₃) and lead iodide (PbIâ‚‚) are mixed in 1-octadecene (ODE) with ligand modifiers such as trioctylphosphine (TOP), trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO), and l-phenylalanine (L-PHE).
  • Dehydration: The mixture is heated to 110-120°C under vacuum for 20-60 minutes to remove residual water and oxygen.
  • Reaction: Under an inert nitrogen atmosphere, the solution is heated to a specific reaction temperature (e.g., 140-180°C).
  • Injection: The cesium precursor is swiftly injected into the lead precursor solution with constant stirring.
  • Crystallization: The reaction proceeds for 5-10 seconds to several minutes to allow crystal growth.
  • Quenching: The reaction is terminated by rapid cooling in an ice-water bath.
  • Purification: The crude solution is centrifuged. The precipitate is collected and re-dispersed in an organic solvent like hexane or toluene for further use.

Protocol 2: Ligand-Assisted Reprecipitation (LARP) [2]

• Principle: Dissolving perovskite precursors in a good solvent and then inducing crystallization by adding a poor solvent, facilitated by ligands.
• Detailed Workflow:
  • Precursor Solution: Perovskite precursors (e.g., PbIâ‚‚, CsI) and desired ligands (e.g., OA, OAm) are dissolved in a polar solvent like DMF or DMSO.
  • Precipitation: The precursor solution is injected into a vigorously stirring non-solvent, such as toluene or chlorobenzene.
  • Crystallization: The change in solvent environment triggers the instantaneous formation of PQDs.
  • Purification: The resulting colloidal solution is centrifuged to remove large aggregates, and the supernatant containing the PQDs is collected.

Standardized Stress Testing Methodologies

Protocol A: Operational Lifetime Testing (for PeLEDs) [11]

• Objective: To evaluate the stability of PQDs under continuous electrical driving conditions in a device configuration.
• Procedure:
  • Device Fabrication: PQDs are integrated into a standard LED structure (e.g., ITO/PEDOT:PSS/Poly-TPD/PQDs/TPBi/LiF/Al).
  • Constant Driving: Devices are driven at a constant current density to achieve an initial specific luminance (e.g., 100 cd/m²).
  • Data Recording: The luminance is monitored over time until it drops to half of its initial value (T<sub>50</sub> lifetime).

Protocol B: Photostability Testing [2]

• Objective: To assess the resistance of PQDs to prolonged illumination.
• Procedure:
  • Sample Preparation: A thin film of PQDs is prepared on a substrate via spin-coating.
  • Continuous Illumination: The film is exposed to constant high-intensity light from a laser or LED source (e.g., UV light).
  • Monitoring: The PL intensity or PLQY is measured at regular intervals to track the degradation rate.

Protocol C: Environmental Stability Testing [16] [2]

• Objective: To evaluate stability under ambient conditions (moisture, oxygen).
• Procedure:
  • Storage: PQD solutions or films are stored in ambient air (typically at controlled humidity levels of 40-60% RH).
  • Periodic Characterization: The optical properties (PL intensity, PLQY, absorption) and structural properties (via XRD) are analyzed over days or weeks to observe degradation, such as a phase transition or a drop in emission intensity.

The workflow for the synthesis and stress testing of perovskite quantum dots is summarized in the diagram below.

Ligand Chemistry and Passivation Mechanisms

The efficacy of surface ligands is governed by their molecular structure and binding interactions with the PQD surface. A deep understanding of this relationship is crucial for rational design.

Classification by Functional Groups and Mechanisms

The following diagram classifies common ligand functional groups and their primary passivation mechanisms on the PQD surface.

Carboxylate-based ligands (e.g., oleic acid) typically bind strongly to undercoordinated Pb²⁺ sites on the PQD surface in a bidentate chelating mode, effectively passivating these dominant surface defects and reducing charge carrier trapping [8]. Ammonium-based ligands (e.g., oleylamine) interact electrostatically with halide anions on the surface, helping to stabilize the crystal lattice [47]. The combination of these two in a binary ligand system (OA/OAm) is common, but their equilibrium can be dynamic and sensitive to purification [69].

Zwitterionic ligands like lecithin, which contain both positive and negative charges in a single molecule, offer a compelling alternative. They demonstrate strong binding affinity and high surface coverage, which not only improves colloidal stability but also remarkably suppresses photoluminescence blinking at the single-particle level [69]. Similarly, ionic liquids such as [BMIM]OTF exhibit strong coordination with the perovskite surface (both anion and cation can coordinate), which enhances crystallinity during growth, reduces defect states, and improves charge injection in devices, leading to significantly enhanced operational lifetime [11].

Computational studies confirm that ligands with extended π-conjugated systems and electron-withdrawing groups can introduce electronic states near the band edges of the PQD, potentially enhancing charge transport in QD assemblies. However, some ligands can create midgap states that permanently trap charges and quench luminescence, underscoring the need for careful ligand selection [8].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

The table below lists key reagents and materials commonly used in the synthesis and stabilization of perovskite quantum dots, as evidenced by the reviewed literature.

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents for PQD Synthesis and Stabilization

Reagent/Material	Function/Role	Examples from Literature
Cesium Precursors	Source of Cs⁺ cations	Cesium carbonate (Cs₂CO₃), Cesium acetate (Cs(OAc)) [16] [47]
Lead Precursors	Source of Pb²⁺ cations	Lead iodide (PbI₂), Lead bromide (PbBr₂) [16]
Solvents	Reaction medium; precipitation	1-Octadecene (ODE), Dimethylformamide (DMF), Toluene, Chlorobenzene [16] [47]
Standard Ligands	Surface passivation & colloidal stability	Oleic Acid (OA), Oleylamine (OAm) [69] [47]
Multidentate/Zwitterionic Ligands	Enhanced binding affinity; blinking suppression	Lecithin, Primary Amine Zwitterion (PEA-C8C12) [69]
Ionic Liquids	Defect passivation; improved crystallinity & charge injection	1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium Trifluoromethanesulfonate ([BMIM]OTF) [11]
Short-Chain Ligands	Enhanced charge transport; defect passivation	2-hexyldecanoic acid (2-HA), Acetate (AcO⁻) [7]
Precursor Additives	Improve precursor conversion; participate in passivation	Acetate ions (in cesium precursor) [7]

The systematic assessment of PQD stability under environmental and operational stresses unequivocally demonstrates that surface ligand engineering is a cornerstone for enhancing device longevity and commercial viability. While traditional ligands like OA and OAm provide a foundational understanding, emerging strategies—including zwitterionic molecules, ionic liquids, and advanced precursor chemistries—offer superior performance. These innovations achieve stronger binding, more effective defect passivation, and reduced non-radiative recombination, leading to dramatic improvements in PLQY, operational lifetime (T<sub>50</sub>), and photostability. The future of stable perovskite optoelectronics lies in the rational, computationally guided design of ligand systems that simultaneously address chemical, thermal, and optical degradation pathways, ultimately bridging the gap between laboratory innovation and robust commercial application.

Conclusion

Surface ligand engineering emerges as the paramount strategy for unlocking the full potential of perovskite quantum dots in optoelectronics. The key synthesis is that a holistic approach—combining a fundamental understanding of surface atomistic structure, innovative ligand design with strong binding and attractive intermolecular interactions, and application-targeted optimization—is essential for developing devices that are both highly efficient and stable. Future directions must focus on designing novel ligand architectures that simultaneously offer robust passivation, excellent charge transport, and resilience against thermal and photo-induced stresses. Bridging the gap between laboratory-scale innovation and the requirements for commercial manufacturing, particularly in scalability and batch-to-batch reproducibility, will be the critical next step for the widespread adoption of PQD technologies in the biomedical, energy, and display sectors.

References

• 1. Photoluminescence Enhancement in Perovskite ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/18/17/4195]
• 2. Halide Perovskite Nanostructures: Processing Methods ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s44310-025-00090-5]
• 3. Lattice-matched molecular-anchor design for high- ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-63684-9]
• 4. Tailored ligand design enabling comprehensive passivation of ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/tc/d5tc01455g]
• 5. Recent advances in the synthesis and passivation of pure ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/nr/d5nr01215e]
• 6. Interfacial Defect Suppression and Enhanced Optical ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12429862/]
• 7. High-quality perovskite quantum dots with excellent ... [https://www.light-am.com/article/doi/10.37188/lam.2025.012]
• 8. Computational Screening of Ligands for Enhanced ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12169668/]
• 9. Ligand engineering of perovskite quantum dots for efficient ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2095495622000730]
• 10. In situ 2D-perovskite-like ligands offer versatile passivation of ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/el/d5el00135h]
• 11. Nanosecond response perovskite quantum dot light ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41377-025-01959-y]
• 12. Enhanced coordination interaction with multi-site binding ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-61563-x]
• 13. Thermal tolerance of perovskite quantum dots dependent ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-37943-6]
• 14. Anchoring ligand engineering enables highly stable MA-free ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/ee/d5ee03162a]
• 15. Stability enhancement of PbS quantum dots by site ... [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12274-020-3081-5]
• 16. Effect of Surface Ligand Modification on the Optical ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2468023025023211]
• 17. Hot-Injection Synthesis of Cesium Lead Halide Perovskite ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/17/10/2173]
• 18. Enhancing the performance of LARP-synthesized CsPbBr3 ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2020/ra/d0ra02622k]
• 19. Automated LARP synthesis identifies optimal ligand ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666998623003034]
• 20. Understanding Synthesis Space in Ligand-Assisted ... [https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article-details/688c67a2fc5f0acb5239ac83]
• 21. Mechanochemical synthesis of pure phase mixed-cation ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2021/ra/d0ra10751d]
• 22. Mechanochemical synthesis of lead-free Perovskites [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1369800125004159]
• 23. Hot-injection synthesis of lead-free pseudo-alkali metal- ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/materials/articles/10.3389/fmats.2023.1298188/full]
• 24. Ligand Engineering of Inorganic Lead Halide Perovskite ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11280295/]
• 25. In situ ligand passivated organic–inorganic hybrid ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0021979725005314]
• 26. In situ synthesis of ultra-small CsPbBr 3 quantum dots ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1385894725056177]
• 27. The regulation of interface defects and photovoltaic ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386947725002504]
• 28. Sequential solid-state multiligand exchange of FAPbI3 ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/tc/d5tc00040h]
• 29. Preparation of sulfur group compounds and perovskite ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589965125000248]
• 30. New ligand exchange process enables improved ... [https://www.perovskite-info.com/new-ligand-exchange-process-enables-improved-perovskite-quantum-dots-efficient]
• 31. Ligand exchange engineering of FAPbI3 perovskite quantum ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9756204/]
• 32. Tailoring solvent-mediated ligand exchange for CsPbI3 ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542435122002343]
• 33. Design of a simple solution-processed universal shell for ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/ra/d5ra04253d]
• 34. Strongly-confined colloidal lead-halide perovskite quantum dots [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2024/cs/d4cs00077c]
• 35. Classifying the Role of Surface Ligands on the Passivation ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10892567/]
• 36. In Situ Ligand Bonding Management of CsPbI 3 Perovskite ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32840045/]
• 37. Surface ligand engineering of perovskite quantum dots for ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1385894724043845]
• 38. One-step-fabricated flexible perovskite quantum dot solar ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S092702482500323X]
• 39. Sequential solid-state multiligand exchange of FAPbI 3 ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/tc/d5tc00040h]
• 40. Ultrahigh-performance indoor perovskite quantum dot ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S138589472402641X]
• 41. Ligand Engineering of Inorganic Lead Halide Perovskite ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/14/14/1201]
• 42. In situ imaging of the atomic phase transition dynamics ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-42999-5]
• 43. Inhibited thermal degradation of CsPbBr 3 perovskite ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0021979725017412]
• 44. Towards non-blinking and photostable perovskite quantum ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-55619-7]
• 45. Ligand Equilibrium Influences Photoluminescence Blinking ... [https://depts.washington.edu/gingerlb/publication/gallagher-2024/]
• 46. Effect of aging on perovskite quantum dots [https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/13582/135820C/Effect-of-aging-on-perovskite-quantum-dots--mechanistic-insights/10.1117/12.3064465.full]
• 47. Classifying the Role of Surface Ligands on the Passivation ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/14/4/376]
• 48. Towards non-blinking and photostable perovskite quantum ... [https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/2484177]
• 49. Towards non-blinking and photostable perovskite quantum ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39747164/]
• 50. High-performance perovskite quantum dot synthesis ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/nr/d4nr04942j]
• 51. Enhancing the quantum yield and stability of CsPbBr3 ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022231323007287]
• 52. Rational Design of Amino Acid-Modified Halide Perovskites ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12608446/]
• 53. Striking the balance between the capping ligands ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/cp/d5cp00853k]
• 54. Exploration and Control of Short-Chain Spacer Cations ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1293255825002511]
• 55. Stable and efficient CsPbI3 quantum-dot light-emitting ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-50022-8]
• 56. Molecule-induced ripening control in perovskite quantum ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11908481/]
• 57. MATSUSFall25 - Lead-Free Halide Perovskite Quantum Dots [https://www.nanoge.org/proceedings/MATSUSFall25/686a62e50134460a156e9ed9]
• 58. Perovskite quantum dot solar cell achieves record ... [https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/10/08/perovskite-quantum-dot-solar-cell-achieves-record-breaking-efficiency-of-18-3/]
• 59. University of Queensland team reports 16.65% efficiency ... [https://www.perovskite-info.com/university-queensland-team-reports-1665-efficiency-lead-free-perovskite-solar]
• 60. Understanding the Ligand Effects on Photophysical ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6926956/]
• 61. Best practices for in-situ and operando techniques within ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-57563-6]
• 62. Materials Characterization [https://www.nrel.gov/materials-science/materials-characterization]
• 63. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic technique for analysis ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/na/d5na00522a]
• 64. Application of Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/30/3/684]
• 65. Quantifying the Thermodynamics of Ligand Binding to ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6467082/]
• 66. State of the Art and Prospects for Halide Perovskite ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8482768/]
• 67. All-Inorganic CsPbBr3 Perovskite Nanocrystals ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10383321/]
• 68. All-Inorganic CsPbBr 3 Perovskite Nanocrystals ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/14/7/1332]
• 69. Using single particle microscopy to investigate perovskite ... [https://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/items/1de17a20-13ef-421e-a846-610aaf52a526/full]