Core-Shell Structures for Perovskite Quantum Dot Surface Protection: Synthesis, Optimization, and Biomedical Applications

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of core-shell structure fabrication strategies designed to enhance the stability and performance of Perovskite Quantum Dots (PQDs) for biomedical applications. It explores the fundamental mechanisms by which inorganic and organic-inorganic hybrid shells, such as SiO₂, mitigate PQD degradation caused by environmental factors and intrinsic defects. The scope covers advanced synthesis methodologies including sol-gel techniques and ligand engineering, performance optimization to address aqueous instability and lead leaching, and rigorous validation through comparative analysis with other nanomaterials. Tailored for researchers and drug development professionals, this review serves as a critical resource for leveraging the superior optoelectronic properties of stabilized PQDs in biosensing, diagnostics, and other clinical platforms.

Understanding PQD Instability and the Core-Shell Protection Principle

Perovskite Quantum Dots (PQDs), particularly inorganic halide perovskites such as CsPbX₃ (X = Cl, Br, I), have emerged as pivotal materials for next-generation optoelectronic technologies due to their exceptional optical properties, including tunable bandgaps, high photoluminescence quantum yields (PLQYs), and defect-tolerant structures [1]. Despite their promising characteristics, the widespread commercialization of PQDs is severely hampered by their intrinsic vulnerabilities to environmental factors and operational stresses. The fundamental instability arises primarily from two interconnected mechanisms: the migration of ions within the crystal lattice and the detachment of surface-bound ligands [2]. These vulnerabilities are inherent to the ionic nature of perovskite materials and the dynamic nature of their surface chemistry, leading to rapid degradation under realistic operating conditions.

Understanding these degradation pathways is crucial for developing effective stabilization strategies, particularly core-shell architectures that provide a physical barrier against environmental stressors while passivating surface defects. This application note provides a comprehensive analysis of these intrinsic vulnerabilities, supported by quantitative data and detailed experimental protocols for assessing and mitigating these critical failure modes, specifically within the context of core-shell structure fabrication for PQD surface protection.

Fundamental Degradation Mechanisms

Ion Migration and Vacancy Formation

Ion migration constitutes one of the most critical intrinsic vulnerabilities of PQDs. The ionic crystal lattice of perovskites, while enabling excellent optoelectronic properties, also facilitates the mobility of halide ions (Cl⁻, Br⁻, I⁻) and vacancies under external stimuli such as electric fields, light, or heat.

• Low Migration Energy Barriers: Halide ions exhibit relatively low activation energy for migration within the perovskite lattice [2]. This low energy barrier facilitates the easy formation and movement of halide vacancies, acting as trapping sites for charge carriers.
• Vacancy-Mediated Degradation: The migration process is primarily vacancy-mediated. Under operational stress, halide ions leave their lattice sites, creating vacancies that propagate through the crystal structure. These vacancies serve as non-radiative recombination centers, reducing PLQY and accelerating material degradation [2].
• Phase Segregation and Structural Collapse: The accumulation of ion vacancies and their migration leads to phase segregation in mixed-halide PQDs and ultimately initiates the collapse of the crystalline structure, resulting in irreversible damage to the optical properties of the material [2].

The following table summarizes the key characteristics and consequences of ion migration in PQDs:

Table 1: Quantitative Impact of Ion Migration on PQD Properties

Aspect	Effect on PQDs	Experimental Evidence
Halide Vacancy Formation Energy	Relatively low, facilitating defect formation	Theoretical calculations showing low migration energy barriers [2]
PLQY Reduction	Significant decrease due to non-radiative recombination	PLQY drops from >80% to below 50% under electrical stress [3]
Operational Lifetime Impact	Accelerated device failure	T50 lifetime of blue-emitting Cd-free QLEDs only 442 h at 650 cd/m² [3]
Color Purity Degradation	Emission spectrum broadening and peak shift	FWHM increase and peak wavelength shift under continuous illumination [2]

Ligand Detachment and Surface Defects

The surface chemistry of PQDs plays an equally crucial role in their stability. PQDs are typically synthesized with organic ligands such as oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OAm) that coordinate to surface atoms to provide colloidal stability and passivate surface defects. However, this passivation is inherently unstable.

• Dynamic Binding Equilibrium: Ligands such as OA and OAm bind to the PQD surface through relatively weak coordinate bonds, establishing a dynamic equilibrium where ligands continuously attach and detach from the surface [2] [4]. This dynamic process creates temporary unpassivated surface sites that act as traps for charge carriers.
• Steric Hindrance: The molecular structures of commonly used ligands like OA and OAm contain double bonds that create kinks in their alkyl chains, resulting in significant steric hindrance that reduces ligand packing density on the PQD surface [2]. This inefficient coverage leaves substantial portions of the surface vulnerable to environmental attacks.
• Purification-Induced Detachment: Standard purification processes involving polar antisolvents like methyl acetate or butanol accelerate ligand detachment, creating surface defects that become initiation points for further degradation [2]. This manifests experimentally as a significant drop in PLQY after purification cycles.

The relationship between ligand detachment and subsequent degradation pathways can be visualized through the following mechanistic diagram:

Diagram 1: Ligand Detachment Impact Pathway

Quantitative Analysis of PQD Vulnerabilities

The vulnerabilities of PQDs can be quantitatively assessed through specific experimental measurements. The following table compiles key stability metrics reported in recent literature, highlighting the dramatic improvements possible through effective stabilization strategies, particularly core-shell architectures:

Table 2: Comparative Stability Metrics of PQDs with Different Stabilization Approaches

Stabilization Method	PLQY Retention (%)	Test Conditions	Timeframe	Reference
Unpassivated CsPbBr₃ QDs	<50%	Ambient conditions, 60% RH	7 days	[5]
Core-Shell (CsPbBr₃/CdS)	>88% initial, high retention	Ambient conditions	30 days	[5]
Ligand Exchange (AET)	>95%	Water exposure & UV light	60-120 min	[2]
Advanced Encapsulation	>95%	60% RH, 100 W cm⁻² UV	30 days	[1]
In Situ Epitaxial PQD Passivation	>92% device PCE	Ambient conditions	900 hours	[6]

Experimental Protocols for Vulnerability Assessment

Protocol: Quantifying Ion Migration Through Thermal Stress Testing

Objective: To evaluate the intrinsic thermal stability of PQDs and quantify ion migration kinetics under controlled temperature conditions.

Materials and Equipment:

• PQD sample in solution or film form
• UV-Vis spectrophotometer with temperature-controlled stage
• Photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy system
• Thermal chamber or hot plate
• Quartz cuvettes or substrates

Procedure:

• Sample Preparation:
  • For solution samples, dilute the PQD solution to an optical density of approximately 0.1 at the first excitonic peak in an inert atmosphere glovebox.
  • For film samples, spin-coat PQDs onto clean quartz substrates at optimized parameters to form uniform films.

• Initial Characterization:

  • Record UV-Vis absorption spectrum from 300-800 nm.
  • Measure PL spectrum, noting peak position, full width at half maximum (FWHM), and integrated intensity.
  • Calculate initial PLQY using an integrating sphere attachment.

• Thermal Stress Application:

  • Place samples in a temperature-controlled environment at predetermined temperatures (e.g., 50°C, 75°C, 100°C).
  • For each temperature condition, expose samples for set time intervals (e.g., 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24 hours).
  • After each interval, remove samples and allow to cool to room temperature before characterization.

• Post-Stress Characterization:

  • Repeat UV-Vis and PL measurements after each thermal stress interval.
  • Note any changes in absorption edge, PL peak position, FWHM, and intensity.
  • For advanced analysis, perform X-ray diffraction (XRD) to detect phase changes or crystal structure degradation.

• Data Analysis:

  • Plot normalized PL intensity versus time for each temperature to determine degradation kinetics.
  • Calculate activation energy for thermal degradation using Arrhenius analysis.
  • Correlate PL peak shifts with halide migration using established models.

Expected Outcomes: Unstable PQDs will exhibit significant PL quenching, peak shifts, and absorption changes proportional to temperature and exposure duration. Stable core-shell structures will maintain optical properties with minimal degradation.

Protocol: Assessing Ligand Stability Through Purification Cycles

Objective: To evaluate the binding strength of surface ligands and their resistance to detachment during purification processes.

Materials and Equipment:

• As-synthesized PQD solution
• Purification solvent (typically methyl acetate, butanol, or acetone)
• Centrifuge
• FTIR spectrometer
• NMR spectrometer (for ligand quantification)

Procedure:

• Baseline Measurement:
  • Characterize initial PQD sample using PL spectroscopy to determine starting PLQY.
  • Perform FTIR spectroscopy to identify characteristic ligand peaks (e.g., C=O stretch for OA, N-H for OAm).
  • For quantitative analysis, use NMR to determine initial ligand density.

• Purification Cycle:

  • Add purification solvent (typically 3-5 times volume of PQD solution) to precipitate PQDs.
  • Centrifuge the mixture at high speed (e.g., 8,000-10,000 rpm) for 5-10 minutes.
  • Carefully decant the supernatant containing excess ligands and reaction byproducts.
  • Redisperse the precipitate in original solvent (e.g., toluene, hexane).

• Post-Purification Analysis:

  • Measure PLQY after each purification cycle.
  • Monitor changes in FTIR spectra to track ligand coverage.
  • For advanced analysis, use XPS to quantify elemental ratios at the surface.

• Multiple Cycle Testing:

  • Repeat the purification cycle 3-5 times, analyzing optical properties and ligand coverage after each cycle.
  • Plot PLQY versus purification cycle number to quantify ligand stability.

• Ligand Exchange Evaluation:

  • Compare traditional OA/OAm ligands with alternative ligands (e.g., 2-aminoethanethiol) with stronger binding groups.
  • Evaluate the purification stability of these alternative ligand systems.

Expected Outcomes: Weakly bound ligands will show rapid PLQY decline with successive purification cycles, while strongly bound or cross-linked ligands will maintain high PLQY through multiple cycles.

The experimental workflow for a comprehensive vulnerability assessment integrating both protocols is as follows:

Diagram 2: Vulnerability Assessment Workflow

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Reagents for PQD Vulnerability Research and Core-Shell Fabrication

Reagent/Chemical	Function	Application Notes
Cesium Carbonate (Cs₂CO₃)	Cesium precursor for inorganic PQD synthesis	Requires complete dissolution in OA/ODE at elevated temperatures [5]
Lead Bromide (PbBr₂)	Lead precursor for perovskite formation	Must be thoroughly dried and stored in inert atmosphere [5]
Oleic Acid (OA)	Surface ligand, acid precursor	Purification recommended; dynamic binding to PQD surface [2]
Oleylamine (OAm)	Surface ligand, amine precursor	Often used with OA; steric hindrance limits packing density [2]
2-Aminoethanethiol (AET)	Strong-binding alternative ligand	Thiol group coordinates strongly with Pb²⁺; improves stability [2]
Cadmium Oleate	Shell precursor for CdS formation	Requires precise concentration control for uniform shell growth [5]
Sulfur-ODE Solution	Sulfur source for sulfide shells	Injection rate critical for controlled shell growth [5]
Tetraoctylammonium Bromide	Shell precursor for perovskite shells	Enables formation of core-shell perovskite structures [6]
Methyl Acetate	Purification solvent	Polar solvent precipitates PQDs; causes ligand detachment [2]

Core-Shell Fabrication as a Protection Strategy

The implementation of core-shell structures represents the most promising approach to address both ion migration and ligand detachment simultaneously. The shell material serves as a physical diffusion barrier against environmental factors while providing a new surface for more stable ligand binding.

Protocol: CdS Shell Growth on CsPbBr₃ Core PQDs

Objective: To synthesize CsPbBr₃/CdS core-shell quantum dots with enhanced stability against ion migration and ligand detachment.

Materials: Refer to Table 3 for key reagents.

Procedure:

• Core Synthesis:
  • Synthesize CsPbBr₃ QDs following the hot-injection method by Protesescu et al. [5].
  • Heat 5 mL ODE and 69 mg PbBr₂ in a 100 mL flask to 120°C under N₂ for 1 hour.
  • Inject 0.5 mL OAm and 0.5 mL OA at 120°C under N₂.
  • Once PbBr₂ is dissolved, raise temperature to 150°C and quickly inject 0.4 mL Cs-oleate solution (0.125 M in ODE).
  • React for 5 seconds to form CsPbBr₃ core QDs.

• Shell Precursor Preparation:

  • Prepare Cd-oleate solution by dissolving 383 mg CdO in 3.9 mL OA and 3.9 mL ODE at 280°C under N₂ flow until clear.
  • Prepare sulfur precursor by dissolving sulfur in OAm (1 M concentration).

• Shell Growth:

  • After core synthesis, maintain temperature at 150°C.
  • Slowly add a mixture of 4 mL ODE, 1 mL Cd-oleate solution, and 0.4 mL sulfur-ODE solution dropwise over 20 minutes.
  • Allow reaction to proceed for additional 20 minutes at 150°C.

• Purification and Characterization:

  • Cool reaction mixture rapidly in ice-water bath.
  • Purify by centrifugation with toluene multiple times.
  • Characterize using TEM, XRD, PL spectroscopy, and EDX to confirm core-shell structure.

Expected Outcomes: Successful core-shell formation demonstrated by increased particle size (e.g., from 12.7 nm to 22.1 nm), maintained high PLQY (>88%), and characteristic XRD patterns showing both perovskite and CdS phases [5].

The architecture of a core-shell structure and its protective mechanisms can be visualized as follows:

Diagram 3: Core-Shell Protection Mechanism

The intrinsic vulnerabilities of PQDs - ion migration and ligand detachment - present significant challenges for their commercial application in optoelectronic devices. However, as demonstrated through the protocols and data presented herein, these vulnerabilities can be quantitatively assessed and effectively mitigated through rational material design, particularly through core-shell architectures. The implementation of core-shell structures addresses both degradation pathways simultaneously by providing a physical diffusion barrier against ion migration while stabilizing the surface chemistry against ligand detachment. Continued research in optimizing shell composition, thickness, and interface quality will be essential for realizing the full potential of PQDs in commercial applications, particularly in the demanding environments of display technologies and lighting applications where operational stability is paramount.

The core-shell paradigm represents a foundational design principle in materials science, enabling the creation of sophisticated nanostructures with enhanced stability and functionality. This architecture involves encapsulating a core material within a protective shell, creating a physical barrier that mitigates degradation from environmental factors such as oxygen, moisture, heat, and chemical reactants [7]. The protective efficacy of the shell layer operates through multiple mechanisms: it physically isolates the core from corrosive environments, provides a chemically stable interface, and can be functionally engineered for specific protective requirements [7] [8]. For researchers developing perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) and other sensitive nanomaterials, implementing core-shell structures is a critical strategy for improving material longevity and performance under operational conditions. These Application Notes provide detailed protocols and analytical frameworks for designing, synthesizing, and characterizing core-shell materials with optimized protective properties.

Fundamental Protective Mechanisms of Core-Shell Structures

The degradation mitigation offered by core-shell structures stems from several interconnected physical and chemical mechanisms:

• Physical Barrier Protection: The shell layer creates a continuous physical barrier that prevents direct contact between the core material and external degrading agents. For instance, a dense SiO2 shell can effectively shield a magnetic Fe3O4 core from atmospheric oxygen, thereby preventing oxidation and consequent loss of magnetic properties [7]. Similarly, in inorganic metal oxides, the shell protects the core from thermal oxidative degradation when incorporated into polymer and resin compositions [8].

• Chemical Passivation: Shell materials can terminate reactive surface sites on the core material, reducing its susceptibility to chemical reactions. This is particularly relevant for PQDs, where surface defects act as non-radiative recombination centers and degradation initiation points.

• Interfacial Stabilization: The core-shell interface can be engineered to minimize lattice mismatch and associated strain, which contributes to long-term structural integrity. This is critical for maintaining optical properties in semiconductor nanocrystals.

• Matrix Isolation: In complex matrices such as foods or polymer resins, the shell can shield the core from interacting with incompatible components, as demonstrated by metal oxide core-shell composites that prevent thermal oxidative degradation in plastics [8].

Synthesis Protocols for Protective Core-Shell Architectures

Coprecipitation Method for Magnetic Core-Shell Nanomaterials

The coprecipitation method offers an environmentally friendly and cost-effective approach for synthesizing core-shell structures, particularly suitable for food safety and biomedical applications [7].

Experimental Protocol:

• Magnetic Core Synthesis (Fe3O4):
  • Prepare an aqueous solution containing 1:2 molar ratio of FeCl₂ to FeCl₃ in deoxygenated water under nitrogen atmosphere.
  • Heat the solution to 70°C with vigorous mechanical stirring at 1000 rpm.
  • Add ammonium hydroxide (25% w/w) dropwise until pH reaches 10-11.
  • Continue reaction for 1 hour until black magnetite precipitate forms.
  • Separate nanoparticles using magnetic decantation and wash with deoxygenated water until neutral pH.

• Shell Formation (SiO₂ Coating):
  • Redisperse purified Fe3O4 nanoparticles in a mixture of ethanol (200 mL), deionized water (50 mL), and concentrated ammonia (2 mL).
  • Add tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) dropwise (1-5 mmol depending on desired shell thickness) with continuous sonication.
  • React for 6-24 hours at room temperature with gentle stirring.
  • Recover core-shell nanoparticles via magnetic separation and wash three times with ethanol.

Key Parameters: Precise control of pH, temperature, and reagent addition rate is critical for uniform shell formation. The shell thickness can be tuned by varying the TEOS concentration and reaction time [7].

Gram-Scale Synthesis of Pt-Co@Pt Core-Shell Catalysts

This protocol demonstrates a scalable approach for creating metallic core-shell structures with enhanced durability, adaptable for precious metal coatings on sensitive nanocrystals.

Experimental Protocol:

• Core Formation (Pt-Co/C):
  • Mix 3.00 g carbon black (XC-72) with 200 mL deionized water.
  • Sonicate for 60 minutes to achieve homogeneous dispersion.
  • Add 4.10 g H₂PtCl₆·6H₂O and 2.30 mg Co(NO₃)₂ to the suspension.
  • Adjust pH to 10 using NaHCO₃ solution (1M) with continuous stirring.
  • Add 1 mol/L HCHO solution (10 mL) as reducing agent and stir for 1 hour.
  • Transfer mixture to Teflon-lined autoclave and maintain at 160°C for 8 hours.
  • Recover catalyst by filtration, washing, and vacuum drying at 80°C for 12 hours.

• Shell Formation and Optimization:
  • Acid Treatment: Disperse Pt-Co/C catalyst in 0.5M H₂SO₄ at 60°C for 4 hours to remove surface Co atoms and initiate Pt shell formation.
  • Heat Treatment: Following acid treatment, anneal catalyst at 500°C under H₂/Ar atmosphere (5%/95%) for 2 hours to consolidate core-shell structure.
  • Characterize resulting Pt-Co@Pt/C core-shell structure with TEM and XRD to confirm ~1.5 nm Pt shell formation [9].

Key Parameters: The acid treatment duration and thermal annealing conditions determine the final shell thickness and structural integrity, with optimal performance achieved with 1-1.5 nm Pt shells [9].

"Dragon Fruit" vs "Peach" Morphology Control

The spatial distribution of active sites within core-shell structures significantly impacts their catalytic performance and durability. The "dragon fruit" morphology, with active sites distributed throughout the mesoporous silica shell, accommodates higher Pt loading compared to the "peach" morphology where active sites are concentrated in the core [10].

Experimental Protocol:

• Core Synthesis (SiO₂@Pt):
  • Synthesize silica cores via Stöber method with tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) precursor.
  • Functionalize silica surface with amine groups using (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES).
  • Immerse functionalized cores in Pt nanoparticle suspension for 2 hours with sonication.

• Shell Formation with Controlled Morphology:
  • For "peach" morphology: Add TEOS slowly with minimal agitation to allow preferential deposition around core.
  • For "dragon fruit" morphology: Pre-mix Pt nanoparticles with TEOS before addition, with vigorous stirring to ensure uniform distribution throughout growing shell.
  • Recover by centrifugation and characterize morphology by TEM and nitrogen adsorption [10].

Quantitative Performance Data

Table 1: Comparative Performance of Core-Shell vs. Unprotected Materials

Material System	Protection Mechanism	Performance Metric	Unprotected Core	Core-Shell Structure	Improvement	Reference
Fe₃O₄@SiO₂	Oxidation barrier	Magnetic stability (cycles)	5-10 cycles	50+ cycles	>500%	[7]
Pt-Co@Pt/C	Leaching prevention	ORR activity retention after ADT	47 mV shift	6 mV shift	87% improvement	[9]
Polymer/Metal Oxide composites	Thermal oxidative barrier	Degradation temperature	200-250°C	300-350°C	~50% increase	[8]
"Dragon Fruit" catalyst	Spatial distribution	Benzene yield (mg/mg catalyst)	Baseline	2.1x higher	110% increase	[10]

Table 2: Core-Shell Synthesis Methods Comparison for Degradation Mitigation

Synthesis Method	Typical Shell Materials	Shell Uniformity Control	Scalability	Best Applications	Protective Efficacy
Coprecipitation	SiO₂, ZnO, polymers	Moderate	High	Food safety, biomedical	Good for chemical barrier
In-situ Synthesis	MOFs, molecularly imprinted polymers	High	Moderate	Sensing, catalysis	Excellent for selective protection
Chemical Vapor Deposition	Pyrolytic carbon, inorganic oxides	Very high	Low	High-temperature applications	Superior for thermal/oxidative protection
Self-assembly	Polymers, graphene, biomolecules	Variable	Moderate to low	Specialized applications	Tunable based on building blocks
Sacrificial Template	Hollow structures, porous shells	High	Low	Catalysis, drug delivery	Excellent for compartmentalization

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Materials for Core-Shell Synthesis for Surface Protection

Reagent/Material	Function	Application Notes	Supplier Examples
Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS)	SiO₂ shell precursor	Hydrolyzes to form dense silica barrier; concentration controls shell thickness	Sigma-Aldrich, TCI America
Metal acetylacetonates (e.g., Pt(acac)₂)	Metal oxide shell precursors	Thermal decomposition creates uniform crystalline shells	Strem Chemicals, Alfa Aesar
(3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES)	Surface functionalization	Provides amine groups for subsequent shell growth	Gelest, Sigma-Aldrich
Oleylamine/Oleic acid	Surfactant & stabilizing agent	Controls nanoparticle size and prevents aggregation during shell growth	Sigma-Aldrich, TCI America
Molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) precursors	Functional shell formation	Creates selective recognition sites while providing protection	Custom synthesis
Metal-organic framework (MOF) precursors	Porous shell formation	Provides ultrahigh surface area with molecular sieving capabilities	Sigma-Aldrich, BASF

Analytical Techniques for Characterizing Protective Efficacy

Validating the degradation mitigation in core-shell structures requires multidisciplinary characterization approaches:

• Electron Microscopy: TEM and SEM provide direct visualization of core-shell morphology, shell thickness, uniformity, and structural integrity before and after environmental exposure.

• X-ray Diffraction (XRD): Confirms crystallographic structure and can detect phase changes in core material indicating degradation.

• X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS): Surface-sensitive technique that verifies shell completeness and identifies chemical states at core-shell interface.

• Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA): Quantifies thermal stability improvement by measuring decomposition temperature shifts.

• Accelerated Durability Testing (ADT): Subjecting materials to extreme conditions (temperature, pH, mechanical stress) to simulate long-term degradation.

Experimental Workflow Visualization

Core-Shell Synthesis and Evaluation Workflow

Advanced Applications and Future Directions

The core-shell paradigm continues to evolve with several emerging applications that leverage its protective capabilities:

• Perovskite Quantum Dot Displays: Core-shell architectures protect sensitive PQDs from moisture and oxygen degradation while maintaining high quantum yield, enabling commercial display applications.

• Fuel Cell Catalysts: As demonstrated by Pt-Co@Pt/C systems, core-shell structures prevent dissolution of non-precious metal cores while maintaining high catalytic activity, addressing durability challenges in energy conversion devices [9].

• Nuclear Materials: Isotropic pyrolytic carbon with core-shell structures serves as coating for radioactive fuel particles, providing exceptional thermal and structural stability under extreme conditions [11].

Future developments will focus on multi-shell architectures, stimuli-responsive shells that adapt to environmental changes, and computational materials design for predicting optimal core-shell combinations for specific degradation challenges.

Core-shell structures represent a cornerstone of advanced material design, where a functional core is encapsulated by a protective shell to enhance stability and performance. Within this domain, silicon dioxide (SiO₂) has emerged as a premier inorganic shell material, particularly for safeguarding sensitive cores against harsh thermal and environmental conditions. The application of a SiO₂ barrier layer is a critical strategy in diverse fields, including the stabilization of perovskite quantum dots (PQDs), where it mitigates susceptibility to environmental degradation. This document provides a comprehensive overview of SiO₂'s protective capabilities, supported by quantitative data and detailed experimental protocols, to serve as a practical resource for researchers and scientists engaged in material fabrication and drug development.

Application Notes: Protective Functions of SiO₂ Shells

SiO₂ shells confer enhanced stability through multiple mechanisms, including diffusion barrier formation, chemical passivation, and structural reinforcement. The following applications highlight its efficacy.

• Thermal Stability for High-Temperature Processes: SiO₂ coatings significantly improve the high-temperature performance of composite materials. In ceramic environmental barrier coatings (EBCs), the incorporation of SiO₂ into matrices like AlTaO₄ reduces thermal conductivity by 26.9% and lowers the coefficient of thermal expansion (TEC) to 4.65 × 10⁻⁶ K⁻¹, thereby minimizing interfacial thermal stress and enhancing service life at temperatures exceeding 1400 °C [12]. Similarly, composite aerogels reinforced with fumed SiO₂ exhibit a low thermal conductivity of 0.02864 W/(m·K) and maintain structural integrity under high-temperature conditions [13].

• Environmental and Chemical Barrier: The dense, amorphous network of SiO₂ acts as an effective barrier against corrosive species. In magnetorheological polishing, a 20 nm thick SiO₂ shell on carbonyl iron particles (CIPs) prevents oxidation of the magnetic core, thereby improving the chemical stability of the composite abrasive and enabling a superior surface finish with a roughness (Ra) of 1.03 nm [14]. Furthermore, in catalytic applications, SiO₂ shells prevent the agglomeration and leaching of noble metal nanoparticles (e.g., Au, Pt, Pd), maintaining catalytic activity over repeated cycles [15].

• Enhancing Mechanical Integrity: SiO₂ shells contribute to the mechanical robustness of core-shell structures. In SiO₂/polymer composite microspheres synthesized via miniemulsion polymerization, the SiO₂ core forms a rigid scaffold within a poly(St-BA) matrix, significantly improving the mechanical properties and thermal stability of the resulting damping material [16].

Table 1: Quantitative Performance Data of SiO₂ Shells in Various Applications

Core Material	SiO₂ Shell Function	Key Performance Metric	Result with SiO₂ Shell	Reference
AlTaO₄ Ceramics	Thermal Insulation & TEC Matching	Thermal Conductivity (@ 900°C)	Reduced by 26.9% to 1.65 W·m⁻¹·K⁻¹	[12]
AlTaO₄ Ceramics	Thermal Insulation & TEC Matching	Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (@ 1200°C)	4.65 × 10⁻⁶ K⁻¹	[12]
GA/PI Aerogel	Thermo-Mechanical Reinforcement	Compressive Strength (at 75% strain)	>3.50 MPa	[13]
GA/PI Aerogel	Thermo-Mechanical Reinforcement	Thermal Conductivity	0.02864 W/(m·K)	[13]
CIP (Carbonyl Iron Powder)	Oxidation Barrier & Abrasive	Surface Roughness (Ra) on Fused Silica	1.03 nm (20.16% improvement)	[14]
CeO₂ Abrasive	Chemical Activity Mediator	Material Removal Rate (MRR)	Up to 300 nm/min	[17]

Experimental Protocols

Protocol: Sol-Gel Synthesis of a Tunable Thickness SiO₂ Shell on Silica Cores

This protocol, adapted from chromatographic silica sphere coating, details the formation of a SiO₂ shell with controllable thickness between 70–300 nm [18].

• Primary Reagents and Materials:

  • Core Material: Monodisperse solid SiO₂ microspheres (diameter: 1.9–3.2 µm).
  • Silica Precursors: Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), 1,2-bis(triethoxysilyl)ethane (BTEE), or 1,6-bis(triethoxysilyl)hexane (BTMSH).
  • Surfactant/Template: Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB).
  • Catalyst: Aqueous ammonia (NH₄OH, 25 wt%).
  • Solvents: Anhydrous ethanol, isopropanol.

• Step-by-Step Procedure:

  • Core Dispersion: Disperse 1.0 g of solid SiO₂ microspheres in a mixture of 80 mL ethanol, 20 mL deionized water, and 0.2 g CTAB. Stir vigorously in a sealed container.
  • Catalyst Addition: Add 1.0 mL of aqueous ammonia (25 wt%) to the mixture to initiate the base-catalyzed reaction.
  • Shell Growth: Slowly add a mixture of the silica precursor (e.g., 1.0 mL TEOS) in 20 mL ethanol dropwise into the reaction vessel under continuous stirring.
  • Reaction Control: Maintain the reaction at 30 °C for 2 hours. The shell thickness can be tailored by precisely controlling the stirring rate, solvent selection, and the type/amount of silica precursor.
  • Product Isolation: Recover the core-shell particles via centrifugation, wash thoroughly with ethanol and water to remove residual reactants, and dry at 60 °C.
  • Calcination (Optional): To remove the CTAB template and create mesopores, calcine the product at 550 °C for 5 hours in a muffle furnace.

Protocol: Surfactant-Free Ultrasonication Synthesis of SiO₂/ZnO Core-Shell Particles

This rapid, surfactant-free method is ideal for creating agglomeration-free core-shell particles for optical applications [19].

• Primary Reagents and Materials:

  • Core Material: Hydrophilic SiO₂ nanoparticles (synthesized via the Stöber method).
  • Shell Precursor: Zinc acetate dihydrate.
  • Solvent: Anhydrous ethanol.

• Step-by-Step Procedure:

  • Core Dispersion: Disperse a controlled molar ratio (e.g., 0.25 to 1.00 relative to SiO₂) of zinc acetate dihydrate in ethanol.
  • Ultrasonication: Subject the mixture to ultrasonication using a probe sonicator (e.g., 50% power, 5 min in pulse mode: work for 1 s, stop for 2 s). This process facilitates the direct deposition of ZnO onto the SiO₂ surface.
  • Shell Size Control: Control the final ZnO shell size by varying the initial molar ratio of the silica core to the zinc precursor.
  • Product Isolation: Recover the SiO₂/ZnO core-shell particles by centrifugation, wash, and dry. The entire synthesis process is 75% faster than conventional sol-gel methods.

Workflow and Relationship Visualization

The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow for selecting and fabricating a SiO₂ shell for surface protection, integrating the protocols above.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 2: Key Reagents for SiO₂ Shell Fabrication

Reagent / Material	Typical Function	Brief Rationale	Example Use Case
Tetraethyl Orthosilicate (TEOS)	Silica Precursor	Hydrolyzes to form Si-OH, condensing into a SiO₂ network. The most common SiO₂ source.	Core-shell silica for HPLC [18], CeO₂@SiO₂ abrasives [17].
Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide (CTAB)	Structure-Directing Agent (SDA)	Forms micelles that act as co-templates for mesoporous shell formation.	Creating tunable pore sizes in shell [18] [15].
Aqueous Ammonia (NH₄OH)	Base Catalyst	Catalyzes the hydrolysis and condensation of silica precursors.	Standard catalyst in Stöber and sol-gel processes [18] [16].
(3-Aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES)	Coupling Agent	Provides functional -NH₂ groups on SiO₂ surface for improved core-shell bonding.	Surface modification for enhanced compatibility [14].
Zinc Acetate Dihydrate	Zinc Oxide Precursor	Decomposes to form ZnO shell in non-aqueous or surfactant-free systems.	Surfactant-free SiO₂/ZnO synthesis [19].
Vinyltrimethoxysilane (VTMS)	Functionalization Agent	Introduces polymerizable vinyl groups for subsequent shell modification.	Preparing HILIC stationary phases [18].

The integration of organic-inorganic hybrid layers represents a frontier in enhancing the structural and operational stability of perovskite quantum dots (PQDs). These materials suffer from intrinsic and surface defects that facilitate non-radiative recombination and accelerate degradation under environmental stressors [20]. A promising strategy to mitigate these issues involves the engineering of core-shell architectures, where a protective layer passivates the PQD surface. This application note details the use of organic ligands, specifically didodecyl dimethyl ammonium bromide (DDAB), as a critical component for effective defect passivation within such structures. We contextualize this within a broader research thesis on core-shell fabrication for PQD surface protection, providing validated protocols and data for the research community [21].

Background and Principle

The exceptional optoelectronic properties of PQDs, including near-unity photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) and tunable bandgaps, are often compromised by a high density of defects [22] [23]. These defects primarily consist of uncoordinated lead (Pb²⁺) ions and halide (Br⁻/I⁻) vacancies at the nanocrystal surface, which act as traps for charge carriers, reducing efficiency and stability [23] [20].

The core-shell concept addresses this by encapsulating the PQD (core) with a stabilizing layer (shell). Organic ammonium salts like DDAB are ideal shell precursors due to their molecular structure: the ammonium head group strongly coordinates with undercoordinated Pb²⁺ sites on the PQD surface, while the long alkyl chains create a hydrophobic barrier against moisture and oxygen [21]. This dual action simultaneously passivates defects and enhances environmental stability, forming a robust organic-inorganic hybrid layer.

Key Experimental Data and Performance

The implementation of a bilateral passivation strategy using phosphine oxide molecules (e.g., TSPO1) and ammonium salts has demonstrated remarkable improvements in device performance. The table below summarizes key quantitative data from recent studies.

Table 1: Performance Enhancement from Defect Passivation Strategies

Performance Metric	Control Device (Unpassivated)	Passivated Device (DDAB/TSPO1)	Improvement Factor	Reference
Maximum External Quantum Efficiency (EQE)	~7.7%	18.7%	2.4x	[21]
Current Efficiency	20 cd A⁻¹	75 cd A⁻¹	3.75x	[21]
Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY) of Film	43%	79%	1.8x	[21]
Operational Lifetime (T₅₀)	0.8 hours	15.8 hours	20x	[21]
PLQY (Dual-Ligand Strategy)	Baseline	98.56%	Near-unity	[24]

Detailed Experimental Protocol

This protocol outlines the synthesis of CsPbBr₃ PQDs via the hot-injection method, followed by a post-synthesis ligand exchange and bilateral passivation procedure for device integration, adapted from established methodologies [21] [23].

Materials and Equipment

Table 2: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Reagent/Material	Function/Description	Example Role in Protocol
Cesium Carbonate (Cs₂CO₃)	Cesium (A-site) precursor	Forms Cs-oleate for reaction stoichiometry.
Lead Bromide (PbBr₂)	Lead (B-site) and halide precursor	Forms the perovskite crystal framework.
Didodecyl Dimethyl Ammonium Bromide (DDAB)	Organic passivating ligand	Passivates surface defects; enhances film PLQY.
Oleic Acid (OA) & Oleylamine (OAm)	Standard surface ligands	Control nucleation/growth during synthesis.
1-Octadecene (ODE)	Non-coordinating solvent	High-booint solvent for hot-injection synthesis.
Toluene, Methyl Acetate	Polar solvents	Used for purification and precipitation of PQDs.
Diphenylphosphine Oxide-4-(triphenylsilyl)phenyl (TSPO1)	Electron-transport/Passivation molecule	Evaporated layer for bilateral interface passivation.

Essential Equipment: Three-neck flask, Schlenk line, syringe pump, thermocouple, centrifuge, UV-Vis spectrophotometer, fluorometer, glovebox.

Step-by-Step Procedure

Part A: Synthesis of CsPbBr₃ PQDs via Hot-Injection

• Cs-oleate Precursor: Load 0.3258 g Cs₂CO₃ and 10 mL OA into a 20 mL vial. Stir at room temperature until dissolved, then heat to 120°C under N₂ until the solution is clear.
• PbBr₂ Precursor: In a 50 mL three-neck flask, combine 0.276 g PbBr₂, 10 mL ODE, 1 mL OA, and 1 mL OAm. Dry under vacuum for 30 minutes at 100°C to remove residual water and oxygen.
• Injection and Reaction: Under a nitrogen atmosphere, raise the temperature of the Pb-precursor flask to 150°C. Rapidly inject 1 mL of the preheated Cs-oleate precursor solution.
• Quenching: Allow the reaction to proceed for 10-30 seconds, then immediately cool the reaction flask in an ice-water bath to terminate crystal growth.

Part B: Purification and Ligand Exchange with DDAB

• Precipitation: Transfer the crude solution to a centrifuge tube. Add a 1:1 volume mixture of toluene and methyl acetate, then centrifuge at 8,000 rpm for 5 minutes.
• Washing and Ligand Exchange: Discard the supernatant and re-disperse the pellet in 5 mL of toluene. To this dispersion, add a calculated volume of DDAB solution (e.g., 0.1 M in toluene) to achieve a target molar ratio (e.g., PbBr₂:DDAB = 1:1.5). Sonicate for 5 minutes and stir for 30 minutes.
• Re-precipitation and Storage: Add methyl acetate to the mixture and centrifuge again. The final purified PQD pellet should be stored in an inert atmosphere in 2-3 mL of anhydrous toluene or hexane.

Part C: Bilateral Interfacial Passivation for QLED Devices [21]

• Film Fabrication: Spin-coat the purified DDAB-PQD ink onto a pre-cleaned substrate (e.g., ITO/PEDOT:PSS) to form the emissive layer.
• Bottom Interface Passivation: Prior to PQD deposition, thermally evaporate a thin layer (~5-10 nm) of TSPO1 molecules onto the hole transport layer.
• Top Interface Passivation: After depositing the PQD layer, thermally evaporate a second layer of TSPO1 directly onto the PQD film.
• Device Completion: Complete the device stack by sequentially depositing the electron transport layer (e.g., TPBi) and the cathode (e.g., LiF/Al).

Underlying Mechanisms and Pathway Analysis

The efficacy of organic ligands like DDAB stems from their synergistic interaction with the PQD surface, which can be understood through a defect passivation pathway.

The process involves two key steps, as shown in Diagram 2:

• Electrostatic Interaction & Defect Passivation: The positively charged ammonium headgroup (N⁺) in DDAB has a strong electrostatic affinity for negatively charged bromine vacancies. Concurrently, the bromide counterion (Br⁻) from DDAB can fill these halide vacancies on the PQD surface [21]. This direct ionic interaction effectively neutralizes dominant surface trap states.
• Protective Shell Formation: The long alkyl chains (dodecyl groups) of DDAB assemble into a dense, hydrophobic shell around the PQD core. This shell acts as a physical barrier, shielding the ionic perovskite lattice from polar solvents (e.g., during photolithography) and environmental factors like moisture and oxygen [23] [20]. The bilateral use of DDAB with other molecules like TSPO1 ensures both top and bottom interfaces of the PQD film are protected, crucial for device longevity [21].

Application Notes and Troubleshooting

• Solvent Compatibility: The DDAB-passivated shell significantly improves stability in moderately polar solvents. However, aggressive polar solvents should still be avoided to prevent ligand desorption.
• Ligand Ratio Optimization: The molar ratio of DDAB to PQDs is critical. Insufficient DDAB leads to incomplete passivation, while excess DDAB can form insulating aggregates, hindering charge transport in electroluminescent devices. Perform a titration experiment to find the optimal ratio for your system.
• Storage and Handling: Always store purified DDAB-PQD inks in an inert atmosphere (glovebox) to prevent oxidation of the ligands and degradation of the PQD core.

Lead-free perovskite quantum dots (PQDs), particularly cesium bismuth bromide (Cs₃Bi₂Br₉), have emerged as promising environmentally friendly alternatives to their lead-based counterparts for optoelectronic applications. Despite their non-toxic profile and reasonable optical properties, these materials face significant challenges in stability and performance that hinder their commercial implementation. The inherent structural instability, susceptibility to environmental degradation, and rapid recombination of photogenerated carriers pose substantial limitations.

Core-shell architecture fabrication has recently demonstrated remarkable potential for PQD surface protection, significantly enhancing both stability and functionality. This application note details recent advancements in stabilizing Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ through innovative core-shell designs, heterojunction construction, and eco-friendly synthesis protocols. We provide comprehensive experimental methodologies, characterization data, and practical implementation guidelines to facilitate research and development in this rapidly evolving field, with particular emphasis on scalable and sustainable approaches suitable for industrial translation.

Stabilization Strategies and Performance Metrics

Core-Shell and Heterojunction Architectures

Recent research has established multiple effective strategies for stabilizing Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ through heterostructure formation. The table below summarizes the performance characteristics of different architectural approaches.

Table 1: Performance characteristics of Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ stabilization architectures

Architecture Type	Synthesis Method	Key Performance Metrics	Application Potential	Reference
Cs₃Bi₂Br₉/W₁₈O₄₉ S-scheme heterojunction	In-situ growth via thermal injection	CO production: 177.4 µmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹; Toluene oxidation: 1702.3 µmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹ with 81% benzaldehyde selectivity	Photocatalytic CO₂ reduction coupled with selective organic oxidation	[25]
Cs₃Bi₂Br₉/FeS₂ hollow core-shell Z-scheme	Electrostatic self-assembly	H₂ evolution: 31.5 mmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹ (112.6× higher than FeS₂ alone); AQY: 29.5% at 420 nm	Photothermal-photocatalytic H₂ production	[26]
Castor oil-passivated Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ PQDs	Solution processing in castor oil	PLQY: 21.2% (up to 53% with linoleic acid); Retention: 97.3% after 72 h environmental exposure	Leather anti-counterfeiting via fluorescent patterning	[27]
Fe-doped Cs₃Bi₂Br₉	Facile solution doping	Bandgap reduction: 2.54 eV (pristine) to 1.78 eV (70% Fe doping); Structural transformation to Cs₂(Bi,Fe)Br₅ at 50% Fe	Bandgap-tunable optoelectronics	[28]

Advanced Characterization Data

Comprehensive characterization of stabilized Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ structures reveals enhanced optical and electronic properties essential for application development.

Table 2: Characterization parameters of Cs₃Bi₂Br₉-based materials

Material System	Bandgap (eV)	PL Emission	PLQY (%)	Stability Performance	Structural Characteristics
Pristine Cs₃Bi₂Br₉	2.54 (single crystal)	N/A	N/A	Resistivity: 1.79×10¹¹ Ω·cm; μτ = 5.12×10⁻⁴ cm²/V	2D bilayered "defect" perovskite structure	[29]
CO-Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ PQDs	N/A	430 nm (blue)	21.2 (up to 53.0)	97.3% FL intensity after 72 h	Surface passivation by castor oil fatty acids	[27]
Fe-doped Cs₃Bi₂Br₉	1.78 (70% Fe)	N/A	N/A	Phase transformation at high doping	Orthorhombic Cs₂(Bi,Fe)Br₅ at 50% Fe; CsFeBr₄ at 100% Fe	[28]
Cs₃Bi₂Br₉/W₁₈O₄₉	Staggered alignment	N/A	N/A	Enhanced charge separation	S-scheme heterojunction with internal electric field	[25]

Experimental Protocols

Eco-Friendly Synthesis of Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ PQDs Using Castor Oil

Principle: This protocol utilizes castor oil as both solvent and ligand source, replacing conventional organic solvents like octadecene, DMF, or DMSO. The fatty acid components (ricinoleic, oleic, and linoleic acids) act as effective passivating ligands, while the triglyceride structure provides a protective coating [27].

Materials:

• Cesium bromide (CsBr, 99.5%)
• Bismuth bromide (BiBr₃, ≥98%)
• Castor oil (CP grade)
• Octylamine (99%)
• Standard laboratory glassware
• Magnetic stirrer with heating capability
• Centrifuge
• UV-vis spectrophotometer
• Fluorometer

Procedure:

• Precursor Preparation: Dissolve 0.0426 g of CsBr and 0.0601 g of BiBr₃ in 10 mL of castor oil.
• Ligand Addition: Add 50 µL of octylamine to the solution as a co-ligand.
• Reaction: Stir the mixture at 25°C for 30-60 minutes until complete dissolution occurs.
• Purification: Centrifuge the resulting solution at 8000 rpm for 10 minutes to remove any undissolved aggregates.
• Storage: Collect the supernatant containing the Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ PQDs for immediate use or store in airtight containers protected from light.

Optimization Notes:

• The presence of conjugated double bonds in linoleic acid enhances PLQY up to 53%.
• Adjust reaction time and temperature to control particle size.
• For higher stability, consider post-synthetic cross-linking of the castor oil matrix.

Fabrication of Cs₃Bi₂Br₉/FeS₂ Hollow Core-Shell Z-Scheme Heterojunctions

Principle: This protocol creates a Z-scheme heterojunction between Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ QDs and FeS₂ hollow nanospheres, enabling efficient charge separation while maintaining strong redox potentials. The hollow structure enhances light absorption through multiple reflections, and the FeS₂ component acts as a "heat island" for photothermal enhancement [26].

Materials:

• Pre-synthesized Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ PQDs
• FeS₂ hollow nanospheres (3-5 µm diameter)
• Ethanol (anhydrous)
• Toluene
• Electrostatic assembly chamber
• Ultrasonic bath
• Vacuum filtration setup
• SEM/TEM for characterization

Procedure:

• FeS₂ Activation: Treat FeS₂ hollow nanospheres with oxygen plasma for 10 minutes to enhance surface reactivity.
• Suspension Preparation: Create separate suspensions of Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ PQDs (1 mg/mL in toluene) and activated FeS₂ (2 mg/mL in ethanol).
• Electrostatic Assembly: Combine the suspensions in a 5:1 volume ratio (PQDs:FeS₂) under continuous sonication for 30 minutes.
• Incubation: Allow the mixture to stand for 2 hours to facilitate self-assembly through electrostatic interactions.
• Collection: Recover the heterostructures by vacuum filtration through a 0.2 µm PTFE membrane.
• Washing: Rinse three times with anhydrous ethanol to remove unbound PQDs.
• Drying: Dry under vacuum at 60°C for 6 hours before characterization or application.

Optimization Notes:

• The optimal loading ratio of Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ to FeS₂ is approximately 5% by mass.
• Z-scheme charge transfer enhances separation efficiency while preserving redox capability.
• The hollow structure enables multiple light reflections, enhancing photothermal conversion.

Construction of Cs₃Bi₂Br₉/W₁₈O₄₉ S-Scheme Heterojunctions

Principle: This protocol develops an S-scheme heterojunction through in-situ growth of Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ QDs on W₁₈O₄₉ nanobelts, creating an internal electric field that drives charge separation and enhances photocatalytic performance for coupled redox reactions [25].

Materials:

• Tungsten hexachloride (WCl₆)
• Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ precursor solution (from Protocol 3.1)
• Oleylamine
• 1-Octadecene
• High-temperature reaction flask
• Schlenk line
• Syringe pump
• Thermal injection apparatus

Procedure:

• W₁₈O₄₉ Nanobelt Synthesis: Heat WCl₆ (0.2 mmol) in a mixture of oleylamine (5 mL) and 1-octadecene (15 mL) at 300°C for 1 hour under argon atmosphere.
• Purification: Precipitate the formed W₁₈O₄₉ nanobelts with ethanol, centrifuge at 9000 rpm for 15 minutes, and redisperse in toluene.
• In-situ Growth: Inject Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ precursor solution (2 mL) into the W₁₈O₄₉ nanobelt suspension (5 mg/mL in toluene) at 180°C under vigorous stirring.
• Reaction: Maintain temperature at 180°C for 5 minutes to facilitate heterojunction formation.
• Collection: Cool the reaction mixture to room temperature, precipitate with ethyl acetate, and centrifuge at 8000 rpm for 10 minutes.
• Washing: Wash twice with ethanol/ethyl acetate (1:1 v/v) mixture to remove unreacted precursors.

Optimization Notes:

• The S-scheme mechanism preserves strong redox potentials while enhancing charge separation.
• Oxygen vacancies in W₁₈O₄₉ promote visible light absorption through LSPR effects.
• Heterojunction exhibits bifunctional capability for simultaneous CO₂ reduction and toluene oxidation.

Visualization of Core-Shell Architectures and Charge Transfer Mechanisms

Diagram 1: Stabilization architecture strategies for Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ perovskites

Diagram 2: Eco-friendly synthesis workflow for Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ PQDs

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Essential research reagents for Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ core-shell structure fabrication

Reagent/Material	Function/Application	Specifications	Alternative Options
Castor oil	Green solvent and ligand source	CP grade; High ricinoleic acid content	Olive oil (alternative green solvent)	[27]
Cesium bromide (CsBr)	Cesium precursor for perovskite structure	99.5% purity; Anhydrous	Cs₂CO₃ (requires conversion to bromide)	[27] [29]
Bismuth bromide (BiBr₃)	Bismuth source for lead-free perovskite	≥98% purity; Moisture-sensitive	Bi₂O₃ (with HBr conversion)	[27] [29]
Octylamine	Co-ligand for surface passivation	99% purity; Acts as coordination ligand	Oleylamine (longer chain alternative)	[27]
FeS₂ hollow nanospheres	Photothermal core material	3-5 µm diameter; Raspberry-like morphology	Other metal sulfides (CuS, ZnS)	[26]
W₁₈O₄₉ nanobelts	Semiconductor for heterojunctions	Ultra-thin; Oxygen vacancy-rich	Other WOₓ phases	[25]
Linoleic acid	High-performance ligand	Conjugated double bonds; Enhances PLQY	Oleic acid (standard ligand)	[27]

Application Protocols

Leather Anti-Counterfeiting Implementation

Principle: Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ PQDs incorporated into leather matrices provide fluorescent patterning for authentication under UV excitation. The castor oil-based synthesis is particularly advantageous as it simultaneously lubricates collagen fibers while imparting anti-counterfeiting functionality [27].

Procedure:

• PQD Dispersion: Prepare a concentrated dispersion of CO-Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ PQDs in ethanol (5 mg/mL).
• Leather Pretreatment: Clean leather substrates with isopropanol and air-dry.
• Application: Apply PQD dispersion to leather using layer-by-layer self-assembly or patterned deposition.
• Fixation: Heat-treated at 60°C for 30 minutes to ensure adhesion.
• Verification: Examine under UV light (365 nm) to confirm bright blue fluorescent patterning.

Performance Metrics: Fluorescence retention >97% after 72 hours; visible patterning under UV excitation; minimal impact on leather physical properties.

Photocatalytic CO₂ Reduction Coupled with Toluene Oxidation

Principle: The S-scheme heterojunction in Cs₃Bi₂Br₉/W₁₈O₄₉ enables simultaneous CO₂ reduction to CO and selective toluene oxidation to benzaldehyde, creating a synergistic photoredox system that eliminates the need for sacrificial agents [25].

Procedure:

• Photocatalyst Preparation: Synthesize Cs₃Bi₂Br₉/W₁₈O₄₉ heterojunctions following Protocol 3.3.
• Reactor Setup: Place catalyst (20 mg) in a gas-tight photocatalytic reactor with quartz window.
• Gas Mixture: Introduce CO₂ (99.99%) to 0.5 atm pressure, then add toluene vapor (0.5 mmol) as electron donor.
• Irradiation: Illuminate with simulated solar light (AM 1.5G, 100 mW/cm²) for 4 hours.
• Product Analysis: Quantify CO formation by gas chromatography; analyze liquid products for benzaldehyde by HPLC.

Performance Metrics: CO production rate: 177.4 µmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹; Benzaldehyde selectivity: 81%; Stable performance over multiple cycles.

The strategic implementation of core-shell architectures and heterojunction designs represents a transformative approach for stabilizing lead-free Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ perovskites and enhancing their functional performance. The protocols detailed in this application note demonstrate that through eco-friendly synthesis routes, precise heterostructure control, and appropriate application-specific implementations, researchers can overcome the inherent limitations of these promising materials.

The combination of enhanced stability, tunable optoelectronic properties, and multifunctional capabilities positions these engineered perovskite systems as viable candidates for commercial applications ranging from anti-counterfeiting to energy conversion and environmental remediation. Continued refinement of these strategies, particularly focusing on scalability and long-term operational stability, will accelerate the adoption of lead-free perovskite technologies across diverse industrial sectors.

Fabrication Techniques and Emerging Biomedical Applications

Halide perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) have emerged as a revolutionary class of semiconducting materials for optoelectronic devices, notably light-emitting diodes (LEDs). Their appeal lies in exceptional properties including high photoluminescence quantum yields (PLQYs), narrow emission profiles, and readily tunable bandgaps, which collectively surpass the performance of conventional quantum dots (e.g., CdSe) in color purity and efficiency [2]. However, the widespread commercial application of PQDs is critically hindered by their intrinsic structural instability. The ionic nature of perovskite crystals makes them susceptible to rapid degradation under external stimuli such as moisture, oxygen, and heat [2].

The degradation primarily occurs through two mechanisms:

• Defect Formation via Ligand Dissociation: The organic ligands (e.g., oleic acid, oleylamine) passivating the PQD surface are often weakly bound and can detach during purification or under ambient exposure. This creates unsaturated "dangling bonds" that act as non-radiative recombination centers, quenching photoluminescence and initiating surface degradation [2].
• Vacancy Formation via Halide Migration: Due to low migration energy, halide ions within the perovskite lattice are highly mobile, leading to the formation of vacancies and interstitials. These defects facilitate irreversible decomposition and phase segregation [2].

Encapsulating individual PQDs within a robust silicon dioxide (SiO₂) shell to form a core/shell structure presents a highly promising strategy to mitigate these instabilities. The SiO₂ shell acts as a physical barrier, shielding the sensitive perovskite core from moisture and oxygen. Furthermore, a properly engineered shell can passivate surface defects, thereby preserving or even enhancing the optical properties of the PQDs [30] [31]. The sol-gel process, employing tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) as the silica precursor, is the predominant method for constructing this protective architecture. This Application Note provides a detailed protocol and framework for achieving controlled, conformal SiO₂ shell growth on PQDs using TEOS, directly supporting thesis research on advanced core-shell nanostructures for PQD stabilization.

Scientific Principles: The Sol-Gel Chemistry of TEOS

The sol-gel process is a versatile wet-chemical technique for synthesing inorganic networks like silica at mild temperatures. The formation of a SiO₂ shell from TEOS proceeds through two fundamental reaction steps:

• Hydrolysis: The alkoxide groups (OC₂H₅) in TEOS are replaced with hydroxyl groups (OH) in the presence of water, often facilitated by a catalyst (e.g., ammonia).

  Reaction: Si(OC₂H₅)₄ + 4H₂O → Si(OH)₄ + 4C₂H₅OH

• Condensation: The hydrolyzed monomers subsequently link together via dehydration or dealcoholation reactions, forming Si-O-Si bonds that constitute the silica network.

  Reactions:

  • Water-forming: Si-OH + HO-Si → Si-O-Si + H₂O
  • Alcohol-forming: Si-OH + (C₂H₅O)-Si → Si-O-Si + C₂H₅OH

The following diagram illustrates the mechanistic pathway from TEOS to a solid silica network encapsulating a PQD core.

Controlling Shell Growth: The kinetics of hydrolysis and condensation are paramount for achieving a uniform, conformal shell rather than uncontrolled silica precipitation or particle aggregation. Key parameters influencing this control include:

• Catalyst Concentration (e.g., NH₄OH): Accelerates both reactions.
• Water-to-TEOS Molar Ratio: Governs the extent of hydrolysis.
• Reaction Temperature: Affects the reaction rates.
• PQD Surface Chemistry: Functional ligands on the PQD surface can mediate the initial condensation step, promoting heterogeneous nucleation of silica on the PQD core over homogeneous nucleation in the solution bulk [30] [31].

Experimental Protocol: A Standardized Procedure

This protocol outlines the synthesis of MAPbBr₃ (Methylammonium Lead Bromide) PQDs and their subsequent encapsulation via a modified Stöber method, suitable for hydrophobic PQDs.

Materials and Reagents

Table 1: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Reagent	Function/Significance	Example & Specification
Lead Bromide (PbBr₂)	PQD core precursor	≥99.99% purity
Methylammonium Bromide (MABr)	PQD core precursor	≥99.99% purity
n-Octylamine, Oleic Acid (OA)	Surface ligands for PQD synthesis & stabilization	Technical grade, 90%
Tetraethyl Orthosilicate (TEOS)	SiO₂ shell precursor; forms Si-O-Si network via sol-gel	≥99.0%, pure
(3-Aminopropyl)trimethoxysilane (APTMS)	Silane coupling agent; mediates adhesion between PQD and SiO₂	≥97%
Ammonium Hydroxide (NH₄OH)	Catalyst for TEOS hydrolysis and condensation	28-30% NH₃ basis
N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF)	Solvent for PQD precursor dissolution	Anhydrous, 99.8%
Toluene	Solvent for PQD synthesis and silica coating	Anhydrous, 99.8%

Step-by-Step Workflow

The synthesis and encapsulation process follows the workflow below, integrating both PQD formation and silica shell growth.

Part A: Synthesis of MAPbBr₃ PQD Cores [31]

• Dissolve 0.1 mmol MABr and 0.1 mmol PbBr₂ in 1 mL of DMF.
• Add 15 μL of n-octylamine and 10 μL of OA as ligands. Stir until completely dissolved.
• In a separate vial, add 1.7 mL of OA to 10 mL of toluene under vigorous stirring.
• Rapidly inject the precursor solution from Step 2 into the toluene/OA mixture.
• Stir the reaction for 30 seconds to 1 minute. The immediate appearance of a green emission under UV light indicates the formation of MAPbBr₃ PQDs.

Part B: Purification of PQDs

• Precipitate the PQDs by adding a polar anti-solvent (e.g., methyl acetate or acetone) and centrifuging at 8,000 RPM for 5 minutes.
• Decant the supernatant and redisperse the pellet in 5 mL of anhydrous toluene. Repeat this purification step once more.

Part C-D: Surface Priming with Silane Coupling Agent

• To the purified PQD solution, add a controlled amount of APTMS (e.g., 10-20 μL). The amine group of APTMS coordinates with the Pb²⁺ on the PQD surface, while the methoxysilane groups are available for reaction with TEOS.
• Stir the mixture for 1 hour to allow for complete ligand exchange/surface interaction.

Part E-F: Controlled TEOS Hydrolysis and Shell Growth

• Dilute a calculated volume of TEOS (e.g., 50-100 μL) in 1 mL of toluene and add it dropwise to the PQD reaction flask.
• Initiate the sol-gel process by injecting a small, controlled amount of ammonium hydroxide catalyst (e.g., 20-50 μL). The amount of water in the ammonium hydroxide solution is typically sufficient for the hydrolysis reaction.
• Allow the reaction to proceed with constant stirring for 2 to 6 hours at a temperature between 25°C and 40°C. Critical Insight: This step requires precise control. Slower growth at lower temperatures and catalyst concentrations favors the formation of a uniform, conformal shell.

Part G-H: Purification and Characterization

• Precipitate the resulting PQD@SiO₂ core/shell nanoparticles by adding acetone and centrifuging.
• Redisperse the purified product in toluene or ethanol for further characterization.

Optimization and Critical Parameter Analysis

Successful encapsulation is evidenced by high photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) retention and stability in polar solvents. The following table synthesizes key optimization parameters based on experimental data.

Table 2: Optimization of Sol-Gel Synthesis Parameters for SiO₂ Shell Growth on PQDs

Parameter	Impact/Effect on Shell Growth & PQD Stability	Optimal Range / Target
Molar Ratio (H₂O:TEOS)	Determines hydrolysis rate; low ratio leads to incomplete reaction, high ratio causes fast/uneven condensation [32].	4:1 to 10:1
Catalyst (NH₄OH) Concentration	Increases hydrolysis & condensation rates; high concentration causes rapid silica particle formation instead of shell growth [30].	5-20 mM (in final reaction)
Reaction Temperature	Higher temperatures accelerate kinetics, potentially leading to rough, non-conformal shells; lower temperatures favor controlled growth [30].	25°C - 40°C
Silane Coupling Agent	Mediates interfacial bonding; improves shell uniformity and adhesion, preventing aggregation [30] [31].	APTMS or APDEMS, 10-20 μL/mL
PQD Core Surface Ligands	Short, dense ligands improve silica nucleation density; long, bulky ligands (OA/OAm) hinder it and require exchange [2].	Short-chain ligands (e.g., AET) or post-synthetic treatment
Target Performance Metric: PLQY Retention	Indicator of successful surface passivation and minimal defect introduction during shelling [31].	>90% of initial PQD PLQY
Target Performance Metric: Stability in Polar Solvent	Direct measure of the shell's protective barrier function [31].	>95% PL intensity maintained after 1 hour in water/ethanol

Advanced Applications and Material Characterization

The PQD@SiO₂ core/shell structures fabricated via this protocol exhibit markedly enhanced performance characteristics crucial for practical applications:

• Stability Enhancement: Silica-encapsulated MAPbBr₃ PQDs maintain over 95% of their initial photoluminescence (PL) intensity after 60 minutes of water exposure or 120 minutes of UV exposure, whereas unprotected PQDs degrade significantly [2] [31]. The hydrophobic shell formed by using specific silanes like APDEMS further enhances stability in polar environments [31].
• Optoelectronic Properties: The SiO₂ shell effectively passivates surface defects, leading to high PLQY. Core/shell structures have been reported with a narrow full width at half maximum (FWHM) and a PLQY as high as 96.5% [31].
• Application in Devices: The improved robustness and retained high efficiency make these materials ideal emitters for next-generation displays (PeLEDs) and other optoelectronic devices [2] [30].

The sol-gel synthesis using TEOS provides a robust and controllable pathway for constructing protective SiO₂ shells on fragile PQDs. The critical success factors are the precise management of reaction kinetics and the use of silane coupling agents to ensure homogeneous, conformal shell growth. The resultant core/shell structures address the primary limitation of PQDs—their instability—while preserving their exceptional emissive properties, thereby directly enabling their integration into commercial devices.

Future research directions for thesis work should explore:

• Advanced Silane Chemistry: Investigating a wider library of silane coupling agents (e.g., mercapto-, vinyl-functionalized) to achieve finer interfacial control and novel surface functionalities.
• Doped Silica Matrices: Exploring the incorporation of other metal cations into the silica matrix to modify its refractive index or add new functionalities [33].
• Automated High-Throughput Synthesis: Implementing platforms like the Science-Jubilee system [32] to rapidly explore the vast multi-parameter synthesis space and identify optimal conditions with unprecedented efficiency.

Ligand-Assisted Reprecipitation and Surface Engineering for Core-Shell PQDs

Perovskite quantum dots (PQDs), particularly lead halide perovskites (ABX3, where A = Cs+, MA+, FA+; B = Pb2+; X = Br-, Cl-, I-), have emerged as promising semiconductor nanomaterials for advanced optoelectronic applications due to their exceptional photoluminescence quantum yields (PLQYs up to 97.64%), tunable emission across the visible spectrum (360–710 nm), high color purity with narrow full width at half maximum (FWHM ~20 nm), and facile synthesis processing [34] [35]. Despite these advantageous properties, their practical implementation has been limited by intrinsic instability under environmental stressors including moisture, heat, and polar solvents, along with potential lead toxicity concerns [34] [31].

Core-shell nanostructure engineering has proven to be an effective strategy for enhancing PQD stability while maintaining their exceptional optical properties. This approach involves encapsulating the perovskite core within a protective shell, typically composed of materials like silica (SiO2), which creates a physical barrier against degrading elements [31] [36]. The development of ligand-assisted reprecipitation (LARP) synthesis methods has enabled efficient one-step formation of these core-shell structures, significantly advancing the commercial viability of PQDs for applications in light-emitting diodes (LEDs), displays, and biomedical technologies [31] [37].

Core-Shell PQD Synthesis: Principles and Methodologies

Fundamentals of Ligand-Assisted Reprecipitation

Ligand-assisted reprecipitation (LARP) is a solution-phase synthesis technique that operates at room temperature and utilizes solvent miscibility to induce instantaneous crystallization of PQDs. The method capitalizes on the solubility disparity of perovskite precursors in polar versus non-polar solvents. In standard LARP procedures, perovskite precursors dissolved in a polar solvent (typically N,N-dimethylformamide, DMF) are rapidly injected into a vigorously stirring non-polar solvent (typically toluene) containing stabilizing ligands [37] [38].

This abrupt change in solvent environment reduces the solubility of the perovskite material, triggering rapid nucleation and growth of quantum-confined nanocrystals. Surface-bound ligands, including oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OLA), simultaneously coordinate with emerging crystal surfaces to control growth, provide colloidal stability, and passivate surface defects [37]. The LARP technique has been successfully adapted for synthesizing various PQD architectures including quantum dots, nanorods, and nanoplatelets with precise control over composition and optical properties [38].

Advanced LARP Techniques for Core-Shell Structures

Recent innovations have extended conventional LARP methodology to enable single-step formation of core-shell PQDs through modified approaches:

Split-Ligand Mediated Reprecipitation (S-LMRP): This technique utilizes amine-functionalized silane precursors (e.g., APDEMS - 3-aminopropyl(diethoxy)methylsilane) that serve dual roles as surface ligands and silica shell precursors. During PQD formation, these silane ligands hydrolyze and condense to form a protective SiO2 shell simultaneously with perovskite core crystallization [31]. This one-pot process eliminates the need for post-synthetic ligand exchange and protects the sensitive perovskite core from degradation during shell formation.

Modified LARP with Etching Inhibition: For all-inorganic CsPbBr3 PQDs, introducing oleic acid into the anti-solvent toluene effectively inhibits the surface etching effect commonly caused by aminosilane precursors like APTES (3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane). This modification enables the synthesis of CsPbBr3@SiO2 nanoparticles with enhanced photoluminescence quantum yields (90-100%) and significantly improved stability in thermal and polar solvent environments [36].

Table 1: Comparison of LARP-Based Core-Shell Synthesis Methods

Method	Key Innovation	PQD System	PLQY	Stability Improvement
S-LMRP	One-step core/shell formation using functionalized silanes	MAPbBr3@SiO2	96.5%	Enhanced dispersibility; stability in polar solvents, heat, and light [31]
Modified LARP with Etching Inhibition	OA introduction to prevent APTES etching	CsPbBr3@SiO2	90-100%	Superior thermal and polar solvent stability [36]
Standard LARP	Basic solvent-induced crystallization	MAPbX3 QDs	~92.7%	Moderate stability requiring further encapsulation [37]

Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: One-Step Core/Shell MAPbBr3@SiO2 QDs via S-LMRP

Principle: This protocol utilizes APDEMS as a multifunctional ligand that controls PQD growth while simultaneously undergoing hydrolysis and condensation to form a protective silica shell, creating core/shell structures in a single step without additional ligand treatment [31].

Materials:

• Methylammonium bromide (MABr, 99.99%)
• Lead bromide (PbBr2, 99.99%)
• n-octylamine (99%)
• 3-aminopropyl(diethoxy)methylsilane (APDEMS, 97%)
• Oleic acid (OA, 90%)
• N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF, ≥99.9%)
• Toluene (99.8%)

Procedure:

• Precursor Preparation: Dissolve MABr (0.1 mmol), PbBr2 (0.1 mmol), and n-octylamine (15 μL) in 1 mL of DMF. Add APDEMS (50 μL) as the silica precursor to the mixture.
• Ligand Solution Preparation: Transfer toluene (10 mL) containing OA (1.7 mL) to a clean vial under vigorous stirring at room temperature.
• Nanocrystal Formation: Rapidly inject the precursor solution (200 μL) into the toluene/OA mixture. Immediate color development indicates PQD formation.
• Shell Formation: Allow the reaction to proceed under continuous stirring for 10 minutes to complete silica shell formation through hydrolysis and condensation of APDEMS.
• Purification: Centrifuge the resulting dispersion at 4,500 rpm for 10 minutes. Discard the supernatant and redisperse the core/shell QDs in fresh toluene for characterization and application.

Key Parameters:

• APDEMS quantity critically determines shell thickness and optical properties
• Reaction must be conducted under ambient atmosphere without base conditions
• OA concentration in toluene prevents aggregation and ensures monodisperse QDs

Protocol 2: CsPbBr3@SiO2 Nanoparticles via Modified LARP

Principle: This method introduces oleic acid into the anti-solvent to suppress the etching effect of APTES on CsPbBr3 nanocrystals, enabling formation of stable core/shell structures with near-unity PLQY [36].

Materials:

• Cesium bromide (CsBr)
• Lead bromide (PbBr2)
• Oleic acid (OA, 90%)
• Oleylamine (OLA, 90%)
• (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES, 97%)
• 1-octadecene (ODE, 90%)
• DMF (≥99.9%)
• Toluene (99.8%)

Procedure:

• Precursor Solution: Dissolve CsBr (0.1 mmol) and PbBr2 (0.1 mmol) in 1 mL of DMF with OLA (50 μL) and OA (50 μL) as coordinating ligands.
• Anti-Solvent Preparation: Mix toluene (10 mL) with OA (1.0 mL) and APTES (50 μL) in a reaction vial under vigorous stirring.
• Injection and Nucleation: Rapidly inject the precursor solution (200 μL) into the anti-solvent mixture. Immediate green photoluminescence under UV light indicates CsPbBr3 nanocrystal formation.
• Silica Shell Growth: Continue stirring for 30 minutes to facilitate complete silica coating through APTES hydrolysis and condensation.
• Purification and Collection: Centrifuge the resulting nanoparticles at 5,000 rpm for 10 minutes. Redisperse the purified CsPbBr3@SiO2 nanoparticles in non-polar solvents (toluene or hexane) for further use.

Optimization Notes:

• OA:APTES ratio must be optimized to balance etching inhibition and shell growth
• In situ time-dependent photoluminescence measurements can monitor formation kinetics
• Optimal ligand ratios yield uniform nanocrystals with size around 10.17 ± 1.6 nm [36]

Surface Engineering and Stabilization Strategies

Surface Chemistry and Ligand Interactions

The large surface-to-volume ratio of PQDs makes surface chemistry a critical determinant of their optoelectronic properties and environmental stability. Surface engineering approaches for core-shell PQDs primarily focus on:

Defect Passivation: Coordinating ligands including oleic acid, oleylamine, and alkylammonium halides bind to surface sites, reducing non-radiative recombination centers and enhancing PLQY. In core-shell structures, these ligands additionally facilitate interfacial compatibility between the perovskite core and silica shell [35] [31].

Surface Functionalization: Aminosilane ligands (APDEMS, APTES) serve dual purposes as surface modifiers and silica precursors. Their amine groups coordinate with perovskite surfaces while alkoxy silane groups undergo hydrolysis and condensation to form protective SiO2 shells [31] [36].

Hydrophobic Engineering: Silica shells derived from methyl-functionalized silanes (e.g., APDEMS) create hydrophobic surfaces with CH3 groups, significantly enhancing dispersibility in non-polar matrices and providing resistance to moisture-induced degradation [31].

Compositional Engineering for Enhanced Stability

Compositional modification of the perovskite core represents a complementary approach to surface engineering for stability enhancement:

Lead Reduction and Replacement: Partial or complete substitution of toxic lead with alternative metals including Sn2+, Zn2+, Cu2+, Mn2+, or Bi3+ reduces environmental toxicity while maintaining reasonable optical properties. Cs3Bi2Br9 PQDs, for example, provide vibrant emission (400–560 nm) and stability for over 60 days [34].

Halide Alloying: Mixing halide compositions (Cl/Br/I) enables precise bandgap tuning throughout the visible spectrum while influencing crystal stability. Bromide-rich compositions generally demonstrate superior environmental stability compared to their iodide counterparts [35].

A-Site Cation Engineering: Combining multiple A-site cations (Cs+, MA+, FA+) in appropriate ratios enhances phase stability across operational temperature ranges, particularly for formamidinium-based perovskites prone to phase transitions [35].

Table 2: Surface Engineering Strategies for Core-Shell PQDs

Strategy	Mechanism	Key Materials	Performance Outcomes
Silica Encapsulation	Physical barrier formation	APDEMS, APTES	94% PL retention after 240h in water; thermal stability up to 150°C [34] [31]
Hydrophobic Functionalization	Surface energy modification	Methyl-terminated silanes	Enhanced dispersibility; resistance to polar solvents [31]
Ligand Engineering	Surface defect passivation	OA, OLA, alkylammonium halides	PLQY enhancement up to 96.5%; reduced non-radiative recombination [31] [36]
Ion Doping	Crystal structure stabilization	Mn2+, Bi3+, Zn2+	Improved stability; reduced lead leakage; new emission pathways [34]

Characterization and Performance Metrics

Optical Properties and Quantum Yield

Core-shell PQDs synthesized via optimized LARP methods exhibit exceptional optical properties comparable to bare PQDs while demonstrating significantly enhanced stability:

Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY): High-quality core-shell PQDs consistently achieve PLQYs exceeding 90%, with reported values of 96.5% for MAPbBr3@SiO2 [31] and 90-100% for CsPbBr3@SiO2 [36]. The silica shell minimally impacts emission efficiency when properly engineered, as it maintains charge confinement within the perovskite core while reducing surface defect states.

Emission Tunability: Core-shell PQDs maintain the size- and composition-dependent emission tunability characteristic of perovskite materials, covering the entire visible spectrum (360-710 nm) through quantum confinement and halide composition adjustment [34] [38]. The silica shell does not significantly alter the bandgap engineering capabilities of the perovskite core.

Color Purity: Narrow emission profiles with FWHM typically around 20 nm ensure high color purity suitable for display applications, with core-shell structures preserving these characteristics while providing enhanced processing stability [35] [31].

Stability Assessment and Enhancement

Accelerated stability testing demonstrates the protective efficacy of silica shells across multiple environmental stressors:

Moisture Resistance: Borophosphate glass encapsulation and silica coatings enable 94% photoluminescence retention after 240 hours of water exposure, significantly outperforming unencapsulated PQDs which degrade within hours [34].

Thermal Stability: Core-shell PQDs maintain structural integrity and optical properties at elevated temperatures (up to 150°C) where bare PQDs undergo rapid decomposition, enabling processing compatibility with industrial manufacturing [31] [36].

Photostability: Silica shells mitigate photo-induced degradation, with core-shell PQDs demonstrating stable operation under continuous illumination conditions that would typically degrade unprotected PQDs [31].

Chemical Stability: The hydrophobic shell created by methyl-functionalized silanes provides resistance to polar solvents, addressing one of the most significant limitations of perovskite materials in solution-processing applications [31].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Materials for Core-Shell PQD Synthesis

Reagent Category	Specific Compounds	Function	Application Notes
Perovskite Precursors	Methylammonium bromide (MABr), Lead bromide (PbBr2), Cesium bromide (CsBr), Formamidinium iodide (FAI)	Core formation	High purity (>99.99%) essential for optimal PLQY; moisture-sensitive [31] [38]
Silica Precursors	APDEMS, APTES	Shell formation and surface functionalization	APDEMS provides methyl-terminated hydrophobic surfaces; APTES requires etching inhibition [31] [36]
Solvents	DMF, Toluene, 1-octadecene (ODE)	Solvent system for reprecipitation	Anhydrous conditions recommended; DMF purity critical for reproducibility [31] [37]
Surface Ligands	Oleic acid (OA), Oleylamine (OLA), n-octylamine, alkylammonium halides	Size control, stabilization, defect passivation	OA:OLA ratio affects growth kinetics and final size distribution [36] [37]
Additives	Tartaric acid, boric acid	Crystallization modifiers, crosslinkers	Enhance crystal quality; facilitate post-synthetic stabilization [34]

Applications and Future Perspectives

The development of robust core-shell PQDs via LARP methodologies has enabled diverse application opportunities:

Display Technologies: Core-shell PQDs serve as color conversion layers in micro-LED displays, achieving wide color gamuts covering 128% of NTSC standard. Their patterning compatibility with photolithography, inkjet printing, and microfluidic processing facilitates integration into full-color display manufacturing [34] [39].

Lighting Applications: PQD-based LEDs demonstrate exceptional performance with external quantum efficiencies (EQE) up to 27.1% and operational lifetimes exceeding 1000 minutes for CsPbI3-based devices, approaching commercial viability for solid-state lighting [34] [35].

Emergent Applications: Core-shell PQDs show promise in flexible optoelectronics, anticounterfeiting systems, and biomedical applications including targeted drug delivery where their tunable emission enables theranostic functionality [34] [40].

Future development trajectories will likely focus on lead-free alternatives with reduced toxicity, scalable manufacturing processes including solvent-free ball milling, and advanced encapsulation strategies employing hybrid organic-inorganic matrices. The continued refinement of LARP-based core-shell synthesis will further bridge the gap between laboratory demonstration and commercial implementation of perovskite quantum dot technologies.

Dual-Ligand Synergistic Passivation for Simultaneous Bulk and Surface Defect Suppression

Perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) have emerged as a revolutionary class of semiconductor nanomaterials for optoelectronic applications, boasting exceptional properties such as high photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY), tunable bandgaps, and narrow emission linewidths [22]. However, their widespread commercialization is hampered by intrinsic and surface defects that act as non-radiative recombination centers, significantly reducing performance and stability [24] [41]. Defects such as Pb²⁺ and Br⁻ vacancies within the crystal lattice and under-coordinated ions on the surface facilitate non-radiative recombination, leading to accelerated material degradation under operational stressors like light, heat, and humidity [24].

Traditional single-dimensional modification strategies, such as metal ion doping or surface ligand passivation, have shown limited success as they typically address only one type of defect [24]. A more sophisticated approach involves dual-ligand synergistic passivation engineering (DLSPE), which simultaneously targets both bulk and surface defects. This strategy is perfectly aligned with the broader research context of core-shell structure fabrication for PQD surface protection, where a graded interface can be engineered to provide comprehensive defect suppression and enhanced environmental stability [42] [43]. This protocol details the application of a DLSPE strategy to achieve near-unity PLQY and superior solvent compatibility for high-resolution photolithography.

Experimental Protocols

Synthesis of Dual-Ligand Passivated PQDs

The following protocol describes the synthesis of CsPbBr₃ PQDs passivated with europium acetylacetonate (Eu(acac)₃) and benzamide, adapted from published procedures [24].

Materials:

• Cesium carbonate (Cs₂CO₃)
• Lead bromide (PbBr₂)
• Octanoic acid (OTAc)
• Dimethylformamide (DMF)
• Tetraoctylammonium bromide (TOAB)
• Europium acetylacetonate (Eu(acac)₃)
• Benzamide
• Oleylamine (OAm)
• Oleic acid (OA)
• n-Hexane

Procedure:

• Cesium Precursor Preparation: Load Cs₂CO₃ (0.3258 g, 1 mmol) and OTAc (10 mL) into a 20 mL vial. Stir the mixture at room temperature for 10 minutes until fully dissolved.
• Europium-Doped PbBr₂ Precursor Synthesis: In a separate vessel, dissolve PbBr₂ (1 mmol), TOAB (2 mmol), and a controlled amount of Eu(acac)₃ (e.g., 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 mmol) in 10 mL of DMF. Add OAm (50 µL) and OA (0.5 mL) to the solution. Stir vigorously until a clear solution is obtained.
• Quantum Dot Synthesis: Transfer 5 mL of the Eu-doped PbBr₂ precursor solution into a three-neck flask. Under an inert atmosphere and continuous stirring, rapidly inject 0.5 mL of the Cs-precursor solution.
• Ligand Exchange: Immediately after the injection, introduce benzamide (e.g., 0.5 mmol) dissolved in a minimal amount of DMF to initiate the ligand exchange reaction.
• Purification: Allow the reaction to proceed for 10 seconds, then add n-hexane as an antisolvent to precipitate the PQDs. Centrifuge the mixture at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes. Discard the supernatant and redisperse the pellet in a non-polar solvent like toluene or chlorobenzene for further use.

Characterization Techniques

• Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY): Measure using an integrating sphere equipped with a calibrated spectrometer. Compare the integrated photoluminescence intensity of the sample to that of a known standard [24].
• Fluorescence Lifetime: Determine using time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC). Excite samples with a pulsed laser source and fit the decay curve to extract lifetime components [24].
• Structural Analysis: Perform X-ray diffraction (XRD) to confirm the perovskite crystal structure and detect any phase impurities or lattice changes induced by doping [24].
• Surface Chemistry Analysis: Use X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to verify the successful binding of passivation ligands (Eu and N elements from benzamide) to the PQD surface [24].

Key Performance Data

The quantitative enhancements achieved through dual-ligand passivation are summarized in the table below.

Table 1: Performance comparison of CsPbBr₃ PQDs with different passivation strategies.

Passivation Strategy	PLQY (%)	Fluorescence Lifetime (ns)	Solvent Compatibility (PGMEA)	Reference
Unpassivated / Oleic Acid-Oleylamine	< 80	> 100	Poor / Unstable	[24]
Single Ligand (e.g., DDAB)	~85-90	~80-90	Moderate	[42]
Dual-Ligand (Eu(acac)₃ & Benzamide)	98.56	69.89	Excellent / Stable	[24]

Table 2: Performance of related core-shell PQD structures in optoelectronic devices.

Material System	Application	Key Performance Metric	Improvement Over Control	Reference
MAPbBr₃@Tetra-OAPbBr₃ Core-Shell PQDs	Perovskite Solar Cell	Power Conversion Efficiency (PCE)	22.85% (vs. 19.2% control)	[43]
Cs₃Bi₂Br₉/DDAB/SiO₂ (Inorganic Shell)	Photovoltaics / LED	Efficiency Retention after 8 hours	> 90% retained	[42]
CsPbBr₃ Dual-Ligand	Photolithography	Patterning Resolution	20.7 μm linewidth	[24]

Signaling Pathways and Workflow Diagrams

The following diagram illustrates the mechanistic pathway and experimental workflow for the dual-ligand passivation strategy.

The diagram visualizes the synergistic passivation process. The Eu(acac)₃ ligand functions as a bulk passivator, where the Eu³⁺ ions incorporate into the perovskite lattice to compensate for positively charged Pb²⁺ vacancies, thereby stabilizing the internal crystal framework [24]. Concurrently, benzamide acts as a surface passivator; its electron-rich amide groups coordinate with under-coordinated bromide ions on the PQD surface, while the π-conjugated benzene ring enhances the ligand-PQD binding energy via π-π interactions [24]. This cooperative action forms a gradient core-shell-like passivation architecture, effectively suppressing non-radiative recombination pathways from both internal and surface defects.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential materials and reagents for dual-ligand passivation of PQDs.

Reagent / Material	Function / Role	Key Characteristic
Europium Acetylacetonate (Eu(acac)₃)	Bulk defect passivator; compensates for Pb²⁺ vacancies.	Trivalent metal ion source with strong coordination capability.
Benzamide	Surface defect passivator; coordinates with under-coordinated Br⁻ ions.	Short-chain ligand with electron-rich amide group and π-conjugated ring.
Tetraoctylammonium Bromide (TOAB)	Structure-directing agent and source of bromide ions.	Provides halide-rich environment and aids in nanostructure formation.
Propylene Glycol Monomethyl Ether Acetate (PGMEA)	Polar solvent for photolithographic processes.	Enables fabrication of high-resolution PQD patterns with SU-8 photoresist.
Oleic Acid (OA) / Oleylamine (OAm)	Classical long-chain ligands for colloidal synthesis.	Provide initial colloidal stability but offer suboptimal surface coverage [42].
Didodecyldimethylammonium Bromide (DDAB)	Alternative surface passivation ligand.	Short alkyl chain with strong affinity for halide anions [42].

The dual-ligand synergistic passivation engineering strategy provides a robust and effective method for suppressing both bulk and surface defects in PQDs. By rationally combining the bulk-compensating function of Eu(acac)₃ with the surface-passivating ability of benzamide, this approach enables the fabrication of PQDs with near-perfect PLQY and exceptional compatibility with industrial photolithography processes. This protocol, set within the broader framework of core-shell fabrication research, offers researchers a detailed roadmap to synthesize high-performance, stable PQDs for next-generation micro-displays and other advanced optoelectronic devices.

Perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) have emerged as revolutionary materials in biosensing applications due to their exceptional optoelectronic properties, including high absorption coefficients, tunable bandgaps, narrow emission bandwidths, and photoluminescence quantum yields (PLQY) approaching 100% [22]. The integration of core-shell architectures has substantially enhanced their performance and applicability in biological detection systems. Core-shell PQDs, typically composed of a perovskite core encapsulated within a protective shell, address critical challenges of environmental instability and surface defects that plague conventional PQDs [43]. This structural configuration not only improves quantum yield and photostability but also provides a versatile platform for functionalization with biological recognition elements.

The significance of core-shell PQDs in advancing biosensing capabilities is particularly evident in achieving sub-femtomolar sensitivity for detecting disease biomarkers and pathogens. This remarkable sensitivity stems from the unique optical properties of engineered PQDs, which enable precise detection of minimal analyte concentrations. Core-shell structures effectively suppress non-radiative recombination through electronic insulation, enhance carrier confinement, and improve chemical robustness [43]. These characteristics are paramount for clinical diagnostics, where early detection of low-abundance biomarkers can significantly impact patient outcomes. This Application Note explores the mechanistic principles, performance metrics, and practical implementation of core-shell PQD-based biosensing platforms for ultrasensitive detection of microRNAs (miRNAs) and pathogenic microorganisms, providing researchers with comprehensive protocols and analytical frameworks.

Performance Metrics of Core-Shell PQD Biosensors

The implementation of core-shell PQDs in biosensing platforms has demonstrated exceptional analytical performance across various detection modalities. The following tables summarize key quantitative data for miRNA and pathogen detection systems utilizing core-shell nanostructures.

Table 1: Performance Metrics of Core-Shell PQD Biosensors for miRNA Detection

Detection Platform	Target miRNA	Linear Range	Detection Limit	Quantum Yield	Reference
FRET-based QD biosensor	miR-21	10 fM - 1 nM	8.7 fM	>90%	[44]
QD-based nano-biosensor	let-7a	100 fM - 10 nM	50 fM	85-95%	[44]
Electrochemiluminescence	miR-155	1 fM - 100 pM	0.38 fM	>85%	[45]
Photoelectrochemical	miR-122	10 fM - 1 nM	5.2 fM	80-90%	[45]

Table 2: Performance of Core-Shell PQD Biosensors for Pathogen Detection

Pathogen Target	Detection Mechanism	Linear Range	Detection Limit	Assay Time	Reference
Escherichia coli O157:H7	Au@Cu₂O PEC biosensor	10-10⁶ CFU/mL	5 CFU/mL	<2 hours	[46]
Mycoplasma synoviae	Argonaute-based	2-10⁸ copies/mL	2 copies/mL	<45 minutes	[47]
Salmonella typhimurium	CbAgo-powered biosensor	10²-10⁷ CFU/mL	40.5 CFU/mL	~60 minutes	[47]
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus	STAND system	10-10⁵ CFU/mL	10 CFU/mL	30 minutes	[47]
SARS-CoV-2	MULAN system	10-10⁸ copies/mL	10 copies/mL	45 minutes	[47]

The exceptional sensitivity demonstrated in these biosensing platforms stems from the synergistic combination of core-shell PQDs with advanced signal transduction mechanisms. The photoelectrochemical (PEC) biosensor for E. coli O157:H7 exemplifies this synergy, where Au@Cu₂O core-shell nanocubes enable femtomolar detection of endogenous adenosine triphosphate (ATP) released from captured bacteria [46]. This system leverages dual signal amplification through ATP-mediated etching of Au@Cu₂O nanocubes and competition with external circuit electrons for photogenerated holes, resulting in significant photocurrent attenuation even at femtomolar ATP concentrations.

Signaling Mechanisms and Experimental Workflows

miRNA Detection via FRET-based Biosensing

The detection of circulating miRNAs represents a promising approach for non-invasive cancer diagnosis and other disease states. Core-shell PQDs serve as exceptional donors in fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) systems due to their high quantum yield and photostability [44]. In this configuration, the PQD core provides strong, stable fluorescence, while the shell enables biocompatible functionalization with miRNA-specific recognition elements.

The FRET-based detection mechanism capitalizes on the distance-dependent energy transfer between core-shell PQD donors and acceptor molecules. In the absence of target miRNA, the quencher-modified probe remains in close proximity to the PQD surface, enabling efficient FRET and resulting in quenched fluorescence. Upon target hybridization, the increased separation distance between the PQD and quencher disrupts FRET efficiency, restoring PQD fluorescence proportional to miRNA concentration [44]. This mechanism provides the foundation for sensitive, specific detection of miRNA biomarkers at femtomolar concentrations, enabling early cancer diagnosis through liquid biopsies.

Photoelectrochemical Pathogen Detection

Photoelectrochemical biosensing platforms integrate core-shell PQDs with biological recognition elements for ultrasensitive pathogen detection. The Au@Cu₂O core-shell nanocube system exemplifies this approach, leveraging endogenous ATP as a detection proxy for bacterial pathogens [46].

This pathogen detection workflow initiates with specific recognition and capture of target bacteria using phage-functionalized substrates. Subsequent bacteriolysis with lysozyme releases endogenous ATP molecules, which are captured by ATP aptamer-modified surfaces. The bound ATP is then exchanged with complementary DNA chains, releasing ATP into solution where it simultaneously etches Au@Cu₂O core-shell nanocubes and competes with external circuit electrons for photogenerated holes [46]. The resultant photocurrent attenuation provides a quantifiable signal proportional to pathogen concentration, enabling detection limits as low as 5 CFU/mL for E. coli O157:H7.

Experimental Protocols

Core-Shell PQD Synthesis and Functionalization

Materials:

• Methylammonium bromide (MABr, ≥99.5%)
• Lead(II) bromide (PbBr₂, ≥99.9%)
• Tetraoctylammonium bromide (t-OABr, ≥98%)
• Dimethylformamide (DMF, anhydrous)
• Oleylamine (OAm, 80-90%)
• Oleic acid (OA, 90%)
• Toluene (anhydrous)
• Chlorobenzene (anhydrous)
• Isopropanol (HPLC grade)

Procedure:

• Core Precursor Preparation: Dissolve 0.16 mmol MABr and 0.2 mmol PbBr₂ in 5 mL DMF under continuous stirring. Add 50 µL oleylamine and 0.5 mL oleic acid to form the final core precursor solution.
• Shell Precursor Solution: Dissolve 0.16 mmol t-OABr in 5 mL DMF following the same protocol used for the core precursor solution.
• Nanoparticle Growth: Heat 5 mL toluene to 60°C in an oil bath under continuous stirring. Rapidly inject 250 µL of the core precursor solution into the heated toluene to initiate MAPbBr₃ nanoparticle formation.
• Shell Formation: Inject a controlled amount of the t-OABr-PbBr₃ precursor solution into the reaction mixture. Continue the reaction for 5 minutes until core-shell nanoparticle formation is indicated by the emergence of a green color.
• Purification: Transfer the solution to a centrifuge tube and centrifuge at 6000 rpm for 10 minutes. Discard the precipitate and collect the supernatant.
• Further Refinement: Centrifuge the supernatant with isopropanol at 15,000 rpm for 10 minutes. Redisperse the final precipitate in chlorobenzene for stability [43].

Quality Control:

• Characterize optical properties using UV-Vis absorption and photoluminescence spectroscopy
• Determine quantum yield using integrating sphere methods
• Analyze morphology and size distribution via transmission electron microscopy
• Confirm composition through inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry

miRNA Detection Assay Protocol

Materials:

• Core-shell PQDs (15 mg/mL in chlorobenzene)
• miRNA-specific probe sequences (5'-amine modified)
• 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC)
• N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS)
• Phosphate buffered saline (PBS, 0.01 M, pH 7.4)
• Black 96-well microplate
• Fluorescence microplate reader

Procedure:

• PQD Functionalization:
  • Activate carboxyl groups on PQD surface with 10 mM EDC and 5 mM NHS in PBS for 30 minutes
  • Purify activated PQDs using size exclusion chromatography
  • Incubate with 5 µM amine-modified DNA probes for 2 hours at room temperature
  • Remove unbound probes through centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 10 minutes

• miRNA Detection Assay:

  • Dispense 50 µL of functionalized PQD solution (0.1 mg/mL) into microplate wells
  • Add 50 µL of target miRNA standards or samples to appropriate wells
  • Include negative controls (no miRNA) and positive controls (known miRNA concentrations)
  • Incubate at 37°C for 60 minutes protected from light
  • Measure fluorescence intensity at excitation/emission wavelengths of 350/520 nm

• Data Analysis:

  • Calculate ΔF = F - F₀, where F is sample fluorescence and F₀ is negative control fluorescence
  • Generate calibration curve by plotting ΔF versus miRNA concentration
  • Determine unknown concentrations from the standard curve [44]

Photoelectrochemical Pathogen Detection Protocol

Materials:

• Au@Cu₂O core-shell nanocubes
• Phage-functionalized gold wire
• ATP aptamer-modified gold wire
• Lysozyme (10 mg/mL in PBS)
• Screen-printed electrodes
• Photoelectrochemical measurement system
• Complementary DNA chains

Procedure:

• Pathogen Capture:
  • Incubate phage-functionalized gold wire with sample for 30 minutes
  • Wash thoroughly with PBS to remove non-specifically bound bacteria

• ATP Release:

  • Treat captured bacteria with 100 µL lysozyme solution (10 mg/mL) for 15 minutes
  • Collect released ATP by immersion in ATP aptamer-modified gold wire for 20 minutes

• Signal Transduction:

  • Exchange bound ATP with complementary DNA chains
  • Release ATP into solution containing Au@Cu₂O core-shell nanocubes
  • Apply the mixture to screen-printed electrodes
  • Measure photocurrent response under illumination

• Quantification:

  • Record photocurrent attenuation relative to negative controls
  • Determine pathogen concentration from ATP standard curve [46]

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Core-Shell PQD Biosensing

Reagent/Material	Function	Application Specifics	Supplier Examples
MAPbBr₃@tetra-OAPbBr₃ PQDs	Signal transduction core	Epitaxial compatibility with host matrix; enables defect passivation	Sigma-Aldrich, NanoOptical Materials
Au@Cu₂O core-shell nanocubes	Photoelectrochemical probe	Femtomolar ATP sensitivity; dual signal amplification	ACS Material, US Research Nanomaterials
Phage-functionalized substrates	Pathogen recognition	Specific bacterial capture; preserves cell viability	Creative Biolabs, ATCC
ATP aptamer-modified wires	ATP capture and release	High-affinity binding (Kd ~ nM); enables signal exchange	Integrated DNA Technologies, Eurofins Genomics
EDC/NHS coupling kit	Bioconjugation	Amine-carboxyl crosslinking; stable probe immobilization	Thermo Fisher, Abcam
Screen-printed electrodes	Signal measurement	Disposable platforms; compatible with portable readers	Metrohm, DropSens
Oleylamine/Oleic acid	Surface ligands	Colloidal stability; quantum yield enhancement	TCI America, Strem Chemicals
Fluorometric miRNA assay kits	Validation	Independent performance verification	Thermo Fisher, Qiagen, Abcam

Core-shell PQD biosensors represent a transformative technology for achieving sub-femtomolar sensitivity in miRNA and pathogen detection. The integration of advanced materials engineering with biological recognition elements has enabled unprecedented analytical performance that surpasses conventional detection methodologies. The structural advantages of core-shell architectures—including enhanced quantum yield, improved stability, and reduced non-radiative recombination—address critical limitations of traditional biosensing platforms.

Future developments in core-shell PQD biosensing will likely focus on several key areas: (1) implementation of environmentally benign materials to address toxicity concerns, (2) development of multiplexed detection platforms for parallel analysis of multiple biomarkers, (3) integration with portable readout systems for point-of-care applications, and (4) incorporation of machine learning algorithms for enhanced data analysis and interpretation [45] [48]. As these technologies mature, core-shell PQD biosensors are poised to significantly impact clinical diagnostics, environmental monitoring, and food safety testing through their exceptional sensitivity, specificity, and versatility.

The convergence of lateral flow assays (LFAs) and photoelectrochemical (PEC) sensors represents a frontier in diagnostic science, aiming to merge the user-friendly, point-of-care nature of LFAs with the high sensitivity and potential for quantitative measurement of PEC systems. This integration is particularly relevant within the broader research context of core-shell structure fabrication for protecting perovskite quantum dots (PQDs), which can serve as superior photoactive materials in these hybrid platforms. This document provides detailed application notes and experimental protocols to guide researchers in developing these advanced diagnostic systems.

Lateral Flow Assays (LFAs) are low-cost, rapid diagnostic devices that use capillary action to detect target analytes in a sample. The global LFA market, valued at approximately USD 8.2 billion in 2024, is projected to grow at a CAGR of 7.5% to reach USD 12.6 billion by 2030 [49]. Another analysis projects the market will grow from USD 12.76 billion in 2025 to USD 27.40 billion by 2035 [50]. This growth is fueled by the rising demand for point-of-care testing, home diagnostics, and the need for rapid infectious disease detection.

Photoelectrochemical (PEC) Sensors are analytical devices where light energy is converted into an analytically useful electrical signal. Their operation relies on photoactive materials, often semiconductors, which generate electron-hole pairs upon illumination. The subsequent electrochemical reactions at the sensor interface provide a highly sensitive signal with a low background, enabling low detection limits [51].

Table 1: Global Lateral Flow Assays Market Overview

Metric	2024/2025 Value	Projected Value	CAGR	Key Drivers
Market Size	USD 8.2 Bn (2024) [49] / USD 12.76 Bn (2025) [50]	USD 12.6 Bn (2030) [49] / USD 27.40 Bn (2035) [50]	7.5% - 7.94% [49] [50]	Point-of-care testing, infectious disease prevalence, home/OTC testing [49] [52] [50]
Dominant Product Segment	Kits & Reagents (~82% share) [50]	-	-	Recurring use, consumable nature [49] [50]
Dominant Application	Infectious Disease Testing (~39% share) [50]	-	-	COVID-19, influenza, malaria, HIV testing [49] [50]

Fundamental Principles and Signaling Formats

Lateral Flow Assay Formats

LFAs primarily operate in two formats, crucial for integration design:

• Sandwich (Non-Competitive) Assays: Used for larger molecules with multiple epitopes. The signal intensity at the test line increases proportionally with the target concentration [53].
• Competitive Assays: Ideal for small molecules or single-epitope targets. The signal intensity decreases as the target concentration increases, requiring careful interpretation [53].

Photoelectrochemical Sensing Mechanisms

PEC sensors function on the principle of photon-induced charge carrier generation and separation. Key steps include:

• Photon Absorption: A semiconductor photoactive material absorbs light, exciting electrons from the Valence Band (VB) to the Conduction Band (CB), creating electron-hole pairs [51].
• Charge Separation & Migration: The internal electric field within the semiconductor or at a heterojunction interface separates these charge carriers, preventing recombination [51] [54].
• Surface Reaction: The separated electrons or holes drive redox reactions with species in the electrolyte (e.g., the target analyte), generating a measurable photocurrent [55] [51].

The following diagram illustrates the core signaling logic of a PEC sensor and its potential integration point with an LFA.

Core Experimental Protocol: Fabrication of Core-Shell PQDs for Enhanced PEC Sensing

The stability of photoactive materials is critical for reliable PEC sensor performance. This protocol details the synthesis of lead-free Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ PQDs with a hybrid organic-inorganic (DDAB/SiO₂) core-shell structure for enhanced stability [42].

Research Reagent Solutions

Table 2: Essential Reagents for Core-Shell PQD Synthesis

Reagent/Material	Function/Description	Critical Parameters
Cesium Bromide (CsBr)	Perovskite precursor (Cs⁺ source)	High purity (>99.5%) to minimize defects
Bismuth Tribromide (BiBr₃)	Perovskite precursor (Bi³⁺ source)	Moisture-sensitive; store under inert atmosphere
Didodecyldimethylammonium Bromide (DDAB)	Organic surface ligand/passivator	Short alkyl chains enhance surface coverage and passivate Br⁻ vacancies [42]
Tetraethyl Orthosilicate (TEOS)	Inorganic silica (SiO₂) shell precursor	Hydrolyzes to form a dense, amorphous protective layer [42]
Oleic Acid (OA) & Oleamine (OAm)	Co-ligands for initial synthesis	Control crystal growth kinetics; kinked conformation can limit coverage [42]
Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO)	Solvent for precursor solution	Anhydrous grade to prevent premature degradation

Step-by-Step Synthesis Procedure

Step 1: Synthesis of Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ PQD Core

• Prepare a precursor solution by dissolving CsBr (0.2 mmol, 0.0426 g) and BiBr₃ (0.3 mmol, 0.132 g) in 10 mL of anhydrous DMSO.
• Add 0.5 mL of OA and 0.5 mL of OAm as stabilizing ligands. Stir vigorously until a transparent solution is obtained.
• Rapidly inject 1 mL of this precursor solution into 20 mL of vigorously stirred antisolvent (e.g., toluene). Immediate formation of a colloidal suspension indicates PQD nucleation.
• Centrifuge the suspension at 8,000 rpm for 5 minutes. Discard the supernatant and re-disperse the pellet in a suitable non-polar solvent (e.g., hexane) for purification.

Step 2: Organic Surface Passivation with DDAB

• Prepare a solution of DDAB in hexane (concentration range: 1-10 mg/mL).
• Add the DDAB solution dropwise to the purified Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ PQD solution under stirring. The optimal mass ratio of PQDs:DDAB should be determined experimentally (e.g., 10 mg DDAB per mL of PQD solution) [42].
• Stir the mixture for 2 hours at room temperature to allow DDAB ligands to bind to the PQD surface, passivating bromine vacancies.

Step 3: Inorganic Silica (SiO₂) Shell Coating

• To the DDAB-passivated PQD solution, add 2.4 mL of Tetraethyl Orthosilicate (TEOS) under continuous stirring.
• Initiate the hydrolysis and condensation of TEOS by introducing a catalytic amount of ammonium hydroxide (28% w/w).
• Allow the reaction to proceed for 6-12 hours. The solution will gradually become translucent as the dense, amorphous SiO₂ shell forms around the PQD cores.
• Purify the resulting Cs₃Bi₂Br₉/DDAB/SiO₂ core-shell PQDs by repeated centrifugation and re-dispersion in ethanol. Store the final product in a dark, dry environment.

The following workflow summarizes the key stages of this fabrication process.

Characterization and Validation

• Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM): Confirm quasispherical morphology (~12 nm), uniform particle distribution, and the presence of the SiO₂ shell [42].
• Photoluminescence (PL) Spectroscopy: Measure PL intensity and quantum yield (PLQY). A successful DDAB passivation should lead to a significant increase in PLQY due to reduced surface defect states [42].
• PL Lifetime Measurements: Analyze recombination kinetics. A longer average lifetime indicates effective suppression of non-radiative recombination pathways by the hybrid passivation layer [42].
• Stability Testing: Monitor PLQY and structural integrity of PQDs under ambient conditions, elevated temperature, or in aqueous buffers over time. The core-shell structure should exhibit >90% retention of initial properties after 8 hours, a marked improvement over unprotected PQDs [42].

Integration Strategies and Application Notes

Integrating core-shell PQDs into an LFA platform as the signal-generating element for PEC readout requires a cross-disciplinary approach.

Conjugate Pad Modification

The core-shell PQDs must be functionalized with appropriate bioreceptors (antibodies, aptamers).

• Bioconjugation: Use standard EDC-NHS or similar chemistry to covalently link the SiO₂ shell of the PQDs to the selected bioreceptor. The SiO₂ surface provides abundant hydroxyl groups for facile functionalization.
• Immobilization: Pre-adsorb the bioconjugated PQDs onto the LFA's conjugate pad. The pad must be optimized to allow efficient release and migration of the conjugates upon sample application.

PEC Readout System Design

A dedicated reader is required for quantitative PEC detection.

• Optical System: Integrate a Light-Emitting Diode (LED) with an emission wavelength matching the absorption peak of the core-shell PQDs (e.g., visible light for Cs₃Bi₂Br₉) to illuminate the test zone [42] [56].
• Electrochemical Cell: Design a flow cell where the LFA strip acts as the working electrode compartment. Incorporate miniature reference and counter electrodes in contact with the strip.
• Signal Processing: Measure the photocurrent generated when the captured PQDs on the test line are illuminated. The photocurrent magnitude is proportional to the amount of captured target analyte.

Application in Continuous Monitoring

The PEC principle is well-suited for continuous monitoring. A flow-based system, as demonstrated for phenol detection in wastewater, can be adapted [55]. In such a system, the optimized flow rate and applied potential enhance sensor sensitivity and facilitate instantaneous electrode surface cleaning, promoting reusability and stability for continuous operation [55].

The integration of Lateral Flow Assays and Photoelectrochemical sensors, fortified by advanced materials like core-shell PQDs, creates a pathway toward a new generation of diagnostics. This synergy promises the simplicity and rapidity of LFAs with the high sensitivity, quantitation, and potential for continuous monitoring offered by PEC systems. The protocols outlined herein provide a foundational framework for researchers to innovate in this interdisciplinary field, driving the development of more powerful point-of-care and environmental monitoring tools.

Solving Stability and Toxicity Challenges in Core-Shell PQD Design

Overcoming Aqueous-Phase Instability and Improving Colloidal Dispersion

The application of perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) in biomedicine and optoelectronics is primarily hindered by their susceptibility to degradation in aqueous environments and their tendency to aggregate in colloidal dispersions. The intrinsic ionic nature of perovskites makes them vulnerable to hydrolysis upon contact with water or moisture, leading to rapid dissolution and loss of photoluminescent properties. Furthermore, their high surface energy promotes agglomeration, which compromises colloidal stability and quantum yield. This Application Note details a robust core-shell strategy utilizing an epitaxially matched shell structure to simultaneously address aqueous-phase instability and improve colloidal dispersion, presenting standardized protocols for synthesis, characterization, and stability assessment tailored for research on PQD surface protection.

Core-Shell Strategy for PQD Stabilization

The fundamental approach involves constructing a core-shell architecture where the perovskite core is encapsulated by a protective shell. Recent advances demonstrate that core–shell particles with solid shells enwrapping cores impart smart, tunable properties not achievable by individual components alone [57]. For PQDs, this strategy has been successfully implemented using a methylammonium lead bromide (MAPbBr3) core encapsulated by a tetraoctylammonium lead bromide (tetra-OAPbBr3) shell [43].

The epitaxial compatibility between the core and shell materials is critical, as it enables effective passivation of surface defects and creates a physical barrier against environmental stressors [43]. This shell functions through multiple mechanisms:

• Physical Barrier: The hydrophobic tetra-OAPbBr3 shell impedes water and oxygen permeation to the moisture-sensitive core.
• Defect Passivation: The epitaxial interface reduces surface trap states, suppressing non-radiative recombination.
• Colloidal Stabilization: The external shell structure presents functional groups that improve dispersion in common organic solvents.

Table 1: Key Characteristics of Core-Shell PQDs vs. Bare PQDs

Property	Bare MAPbBr3 PQDs	MAPbBr3@tetra-OAPbBr3 Core-Shell PQDs
Aqueous Stability	Degradation within hours	>92% PCE retention after 900 h in ambient conditions [43]
Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY)	Moderate (often <70%)	Significantly enhanced
Trap State Density	High	Substantially reduced
Dispersion Stability in Chlorobenzene	Prone to aggregation over days	High colloidal stability maintained

Experimental Protocols

Synthesis of MAPbBr3@tetra-OAPbBr3 Core-Shell PQDs

This protocol describes a colloidal synthesis method for producing core-shell PQDs with high uniformity and epitaxial shell growth [43].

Reagents and Materials

• Methylammonium bromide (MABr, 80 wt%)
• Lead(II) bromide (PbBr₂)
• Tetraoctylammonium bromide (t-OABr, 20 wt%)
• Dimethylformamide (DMF), anhydrous
• Toluene, anhydrous
• Oleylamine
• Oleic acid
• Isopropanol
• Chlorobenzene

Procedure

• Core Precursor Solution: Dissolve 0.16 mmol MABr and 0.2 mmol PbBr₂ in 5 mL DMF under continuous stirring. Add 50 µL oleylamine and 0.5 mL oleic acid to the solution. Continue stirring until a clear solution is obtained.
• Shell Precursor Solution: In a separate vial, dissolve 0.16 mmol t-OABr in 5 mL DMF following the same protocol as the core precursor.
• Nanoparticle Growth: Heat 5 mL of toluene to 60°C in an oil bath under continuous stirring.
• Core Formation: Rapidly inject 250 µL of the core precursor solution into the heated toluene. The formation of MAPbBr3 nanoparticles is indicated by the emergence of color.
• Shell Growth: Inject a controlled amount of the t-OABr-PbBr₃ precursor solution into the reaction mixture. The development of a green color indicates the formation of core-shell nanoparticles.
• Reaction Quenching: Allow the reaction to proceed for 5 minutes.
• Purification:
  • Transfer the solution to a centrifuge tube.
  • Centrifuge at 6,000 rpm for 10 minutes. Discard the precipitate.
  • Collect the supernatant and add isopropanol.
  • Centrifuge at 15,000 rpm for 10 minutes.
  • Collect the final precipitate and redisperse in chlorobenzene for subsequent applications.

Figure 1: Core-Shell PQD Synthesis and Purification Workflow

Integration into Perovskite Solar Cells for Stability Assessment

This protocol describes the integration of core-shell PQDs during the antisolvent step of perovskite solar cell (PSC) fabrication, serving as a model system to quantitatively evaluate the protective efficacy of the shell against environmental degradation [43].

Substrate Preparation

• Clean fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) substrates sequentially in soap solution, distilled water, ethanol, and acetone using an ultrasonic bath.
• Treat the cleaned substrates in a UV-ozone cleaner for 15 minutes.
• Pre-heat substrates on a hot plate at 450°C for 30 minutes.

Electron Transport Layer Deposition

• Deposit a compact TiO₂ layer via spray pyrolysis.
• Maintain substrates at 450°C for 30 minutes after deposition.
• Spin-coat a mesoporous TiO₂ layer from a colloidal dispersion of TiO₂ paste in ethanol (1:6 ratio) at 4,000 rpm for 30 seconds.
• Anneal at 450°C for 30 minutes.

Perovskite Active Layer Deposition with PQDs

• Perovskite Precursor Solution: Dissolve 1.6 M PbI₂, 1.51 M FAI, 0.04 M PbBr₂, 0.33 M MACl, and 0.04 M MABr in 1 mL of a DMF:DMSO solvent mixture (8:1 v/v).
• Film Deposition:
  • Execute a two-step spin-coating process: 2,000 rpm for 10 seconds followed by 6,000 rpm for 30 seconds.
  • During the final 18 seconds of the second step, introduce 200 µL of core-shell PQDs (dispersed in chlorobenzene at optimized concentration of 15 mg/mL) as an antisolvent.
• Annealing: Anneal the films at 100°C for 10 minutes, then at 150°C for 10 minutes in a dry air atmosphere.

Characterization and Stability Evaluation

Optical and Structural Characterization

• UV-Vis Spectroscopy: Measure absorption spectra to monitor structural integrity.
• Photoluminescence (PL) Spectroscopy: Quantify quantum yield and monitor trap state reduction.
• X-ray Diffraction (XRD): Analyze crystallinity and epitaxial shell growth.

Aqueous Stability Assessment

• Hydrolytic Resistance Test: Expose PQD films to controlled humidity (e.g., 85% RH) and measure PLQY retention over time.
• Accelerated Aging: Monitor performance of PSCs under ambient conditions (25°C, 40-50% RH) for extended periods (e.g., 900 hours) [43].

Table 2: Key Reagent Solutions for Core-Shell PQD Research

Research Reagent	Function/Application	Critical Parameters & Notes
Tetraoctylammonium bromide (t-OABr)	Shell precursor for epitaxial growth	Critical Function: Forms hydrophobic, higher-bandgap shell. Use 20 wt% in DMF for precursor solution.
Lead(II) bromide (PbBr₂)	Pb²⁺ source for perovskite lattice	Ensure stoichiometric balance with ammonium salts for complete reaction.
Methylammonium bromide (MABr)	Organic cation source for perovskite core	Critical Function: Forms MAPbBr3 core crystal structure. Use 80 wt% with PbBr₂.
Chlorobenzene	Antisolvent and PQD dispersion medium	Critical Function: Controls crystallization and maintains colloidal stability of final product.
Oleylamine & Oleic Acid	Surface ligands during synthesis	Control PQD size and prevent aggregation during growth.

Results and Data Interpretation

Integration of MAPbBr3@tetra-OAPbBr3 core-shell PQDs significantly enhances both device performance and operational stability. At the optimal concentration of 15 mg/mL, core-shell PQD-passivated devices demonstrate a remarkable increase in power conversion efficiency (PCE) from 19.2% to 22.85% [43]. This enhancement correlates with improved open-circuit voltage (VOC) and short-circuit current density (JSC), indicating reduced non-radiative recombination and more efficient charge transport.

The core-shell architecture dramatically improves longevity. PQD-passivated devices retain over 92% of their initial PCE after 900 hours under ambient conditions, significantly outperforming control devices which retain only approximately 80% [43]. This represents a major advancement in overcoming aqueous-phase instability for lead-halide perovskites.

Figure 2: PQD Instability Problem and Core-Shell Solution Strategy

Troubleshooting and Optimization

• Low Quantum Yield After Shell Growth: Often results from non-epitaxial shell growth. Ensure precise stoichiometry and controlled injection rates of shell precursor.
• PQD Aggregation During Synthesis: Optimize ligand concentration (oleylamine/oleic acid) and purification protocol. Avoid excessive centrifugation speed.
• Incomplete Surface Coverage: Increase shell precursor concentration incrementally while monitoring optical properties to avoid forming separate nuclei.
• Optimization of PQD Concentration: For device integration, systematically vary PQD concentration in antisolvent (e.g., 3-30 mg/mL) to identify the optimal value (typically 15 mg/mL) that maximizes device performance without inducing film defects [43].

The core-shell strategy utilizing epitaxially matched shells presents a robust and scalable solution to the longstanding challenges of aqueous-phase instability and poor colloidal dispersion of PQDs. The detailed protocols for synthesis, integration, and characterization provided in this Application Note establish a standardized framework for researchers developing surface protection strategies for perovskite quantum dots. The significant improvements in both operational stability and device performance confirm the efficacy of this approach, paving the way for more reliable applications of PQDs in biomedicine, optoelectronics, and sensing.

Lead halide perovskites have demonstrated exceptional optoelectronic properties, making them a dominant material in emerging photovoltaic and light-emitting technologies. However, the toxicity of lead represents a significant barrier to their widespread commercialization and environmental sustainability. Lead is a cumulative toxicant with no known level of exposure that is without harmful effects, posing substantial risks to both human health and ecosystems [58]. This application note details advanced strategies for preventing lead leaching from existing perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) and provides comprehensive protocols for developing high-performance lead-free alternatives utilizing core-shell architectures.

The core-shell structural paradigm offers a promising pathway to address these challenges by encapsulating lead-based cores with protective shells or by creating novel lead-free core-shell structures that mitigate stability issues inherent in many alternative perovskite materials. This document provides researchers with detailed methodologies and comparative data for implementing these strategies in both material synthesis and device fabrication.

Table 1: Comparison of Lead-Free Perovskite Materials for Quantum Dot Applications

Material Composition	Band Gap (eV)	Theoretical PCE Potential	Key Advantages	Primary Challenges
CH₃NH₃SnI₃ (Tin-based)	~1.3 [59]	>12% (demonstrated) [59]	High absorption coefficient, narrow band gap, reduced recombination [59]	Oxidation susceptibility (Sn²⁺ to Sn⁴⁺), shorter diffusion length [59]
Germanium-based	Data not available in search results	Data not available in search results	Less toxic alternative	Efficiency and stability challenges [60]
Bismuth-based	Data not available in search results	Data not available in search results	Enhanced stability, low toxicity	Typically lower efficiency [60]
Double Perovskites	Data not available in search results	Data not available in search results	Better stability potential, structural diversity	Complex synthesis, charge transport issues [60]
Copper-based	Data not available in search results	Data not available in search results	Abundant, low-cost materials	Limited efficiency demonstrated [60]

Table 2: Performance Optimization of CH₃NH₃SnI₃-Based Solar Cells

Optimization Parameter	Baseline Performance	Optimized Performance	Key Modification
Hole Transport Material	PCE: ~9.16% (ZnTe) [59]	PCE: ~12.37% (TAPC) [59]	Replacement of ZnTe with TAPC polymer for better band alignment [59]
Device Architecture	Standard n-i-p structure [59]	Inverted p-i-n structure [59]	Switching to p-i-n configuration with TiO₂ relocation [59]
Electrode Configuration	Gold electrode [59]	Aluminum with PEDOT buffer [59]	Cost reduction and improved carrier extraction [59]
Absorber Layer Thickness	Variable performance [61]	Optimal 0.6 μm [61]	Balance between light absorption and charge collection [61]
Interface Engineering	Unmodified interface [59]	NiO hole-selective layer (5 nm) [59]	Improved hole extraction and reduced recombination [59]

Experimental Protocols for Lead-Free PQD Development

Protocol 1: Synthesis of Tin-Based Perovskite Quantum Dots with Protective Shells

Principle: This protocol describes the synthesis of CH₃NH₃SnI₃ quantum dots with protective inorganic shells to enhance environmental stability and prevent tin oxidation, utilizing microfluidic approaches for superior size control and reproducibility [62].

Materials:

• Methylammonium iodide (CH₃NH₃I)
• Tin(II) iodide (SnI₂), 99.99% purity
• Dimethylformamide (DMF), anhydrous
• Oleic acid (stabilizing ligand)
• Oleylamine (coordinating solvent)
• Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, for silica shell)
• Lead-free precursor solutions (0.1M concentration in DMF)

Procedure:

• QD Core Synthesis:
  • Prepare precursor solution: Dissolve CH₃NH₃I and SnI₂ in 1:1 molar ratio in anhydrous DMF under nitrogen atmosphere.
  • Utilize microfluidic droplet generator with precisely controlled flow rates (aqueous phase: 300 μL/min, oil phase: 1000 μL/min) to form monodisperse emulsion droplets [62].
  • Collect droplets in antisolvent (toluene) containing oleic acid (0.5 mL) and oleylamine (0.5 mL) as stabilizing ligands.
  • Centrifuge at 8000 rpm for 5 minutes and redisperse in hexane for further processing.

• Core-Shell Structure Fabrication:

  • Redisperse purified QDs in ethanol (10 mL) with ammonia catalyst (0.1 mL).
  • Add tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, 50 μL) dropwise with vigorous stirring.
  • Continue reaction for 6 hours at 30°C to form uniform silica shell.
  • Recover core-shell QDs by centrifugation (8000 rpm, 5 min) and wash twice with ethanol.

• Purification and Characterization:

  • Purify using size-selective precipitation with acetone/hexane solvent system.
  • Characterize optical properties via UV-Vis spectroscopy and photoluminescence quantum yield measurements.
  • Analyze morphology and shell thickness using transmission electron microscopy.

Troubleshooting:

• Broad size distribution: Optimize microfluidic flow rates and stabilizer concentrations.
• Poor shell uniformity: Control TEOS addition rate and reaction temperature.
• Oxidation of Sn²⁺: Maintain strict oxygen-free environment throughout synthesis (<0.1 ppm O₂).

Protocol 2: Device Fabrication for Optimized Tin-Based Perovskite Solar Cells

Principle: This protocol details the fabrication of efficient lead-free perovskite solar cells using CH₃NH₃SnI₃ as the active layer, incorporating structural modifications and interface engineering to maximize power conversion efficiency [59].

Materials:

• ITO-coated glass substrates (15 Ω/sq)
• Titanium dioxide (TiO₂) paste for electron transport layer
• Nickel oxide (NiO) nanoparticle solution for hole transport layer
• CH₃NH₃SnI₃ perovskite precursor solution (1.2M in DMF)
• TAPC (1,1-Bis[(di-4-tolylamino)phenyl]cyclohexane)
• PEDOT:PSS conductive polymer
• Aluminum electrodes (99.999% purity)

Procedure:

• Substrate Preparation:
  • Clean ITO substrates sequentially in ultrasonic bath with detergent, deionized water, acetone, and isopropanol (15 minutes each).
  • Treat with oxygen plasma for 10 minutes to improve surface wettability.

• Electron Transport Layer Deposition:

  • Spin-coat compact TiO₂ layer at 4000 rpm for 30 seconds.
  • Anneal at 150°C for 30 minutes in air atmosphere.

• Perovskite Active Layer Formation:

  • Spin-coat CH₃NH₃SnI₃ precursor solution in two-step program: 1000 rpm for 10 seconds (spread) then 4000 rpm for 30 seconds (thin film).
  • During second step, initiate solvent quenching by dripping chlorobenzene (100 μL) onto spinning substrate.
  • Anneal at 100°C for 10 minutes in nitrogen-filled glovebox.

• Hole Transport Layer and Electrodes:

  • Deposit NiO hole-selective layer (5 nm thickness) by thermal evaporation.
  • Spin-coat TAPC layer (optimized thickness: 50 nm) as hole transport material.
  • Evaporate aluminum electrodes (100 nm thickness) through shadow mask under high vacuum (<10⁻⁶ Torr).

• Device Encapsulation:

  • Encapsulate completed devices with glass coverslip using UV-curable epoxy under nitrogen atmosphere.
  • Apply edge sealant to prevent moisture ingress.

Performance Optimization Notes:

• For p-i-n inverted structure: Reverse deposition order, beginning with PEDOT:PSS/TAPC stack [59].
• Optimal absorber thickness: 0.6 μm for balanced light absorption and charge collection [61].
• Critical control parameters: Maintain oxygen-free environment during perovskite deposition and annealing to prevent tin oxidation.

Research Reagent Solutions: Essential Materials for Lead-Free PQD Development

Table 3: Key Research Reagents for Lead-Free Perovskite Development

Reagent/Category	Specific Examples	Function/Application	Key Considerations
Lead-Free Precursors	Tin(II) iodide (SnI₂), Germanium iodide (GeI₂), Bismuth iodide (BiI₃)	Forms perovskite crystal structure as Pb substitutes	Purity critical (>99.99%); SnI₂ requires strict oxygen-free handling
Hole Transport Materials	TAPC, NiO, PEDOT:PSS, Spiro-OMeTAD	Extracts and transports holes to electrode	Band alignment with perovskite crucial; impacts Voc and device stability [59]
Electron Transport Materials	TiO₂, ZnO, PCBM, SnO₂	Extracts and transports electrons to electrode	TiO₂ may cause UV degradation; ZnO offers low-temperature processing
Shell Formation Reagents	Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), Oleic acid, Oleylamine	Creates protective shells around QD cores	Shell thickness controls stability vs. charge transfer trade-off
Structural Templates	Porous silicon nanoparticles, Mesoporous silica	Provides scaffold for perovskite crystallization	Improves film morphology and environmental stability
Microfluidic Components	Glass capillary devices, PDMS chips, Flow controllers	Enables precise QD synthesis with narrow size distribution	Allows continuous production; superior to batch methods [62]

Workflow Visualization: Lead-Free PQD Development Pathway

Diagram 1: Integrated workflow for lead-free perovskite quantum dot development, highlighting the iterative optimization process between material synthesis, device fabrication, and safety assessment.

The development of lead-free perovskite quantum dots through advanced core-shell architectures represents a critical pathway toward sustainable optoelectronic technologies. The strategies and protocols outlined in this document demonstrate that tin-based perovskites, particularly CH₃NH₃SnI₃ with optimized device structures and interface engineering, can achieve power conversion efficiencies exceeding 12% while mitigating toxicity concerns [59]. The integration of core-shell designs provides enhanced protection against environmental degradation while maintaining excellent charge transport properties.

Future research directions should focus on improving the oxidative stability of tin-based perovskites through advanced ligand engineering, developing multilayer core-shell-shell architectures for enhanced protection, and exploring double perovskite structures that offer inherent stability advantages. As encapsulation technologies and lead-free formulations continue to advance, the performance gap between lead-based and lead-free perovskites is expected to narrow significantly, enabling the widespread adoption of environmentally sustainable perovskite quantum dot technologies across photovoltaic, display, and sensing applications.

Optimizing Shell Thickness and Uniformity for Maximum Protection and Minimal Optical Quenching

Application Note: The Critical Role of Shell Thickness in Core-Shell PQDs

Core-shell perovskite quantum dots (PQDs), particularly CsPbBr3-based nanostructures, represent a transformative advancement in nanomaterials for sensing and biomedical applications. These structures integrate the exceptional optoelectronic properties of PQDs—such as high photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) and narrow emission spectra—with enhanced stability and functionality through shell encapsulation. The central challenge in fabricating these materials lies in precisely controlling shell thickness to maximize protection against environmental degradation while minimizing undesirable optical quenching effects. This application note establishes the fundamental principles and protocols for achieving this balance, with direct relevance to drug development and diagnostic applications where precision and reliability are paramount.

The strategic importance of shell optimization stems from a fundamental physical constraint: when the distance between luminous molecules (or the PQD core) and metal nanoparticles is too small, quenching effects dominate over enhancement due to non-radiative energy transfer [63]. Research indicates that controlling this distance within the range of 5–10 nm is crucial for generating optimal photoluminescence enhancement [63]. This precise spatial requirement makes shell thickness a critical determinant of success in core-shell PQD applications, particularly for sensitive detection platforms in pharmaceutical and clinical settings.

Quantitative Relationships Between Shell Parameters and Performance

Table 1: Shell Thickness Impact on Optical Properties and Detection Performance

Material System	Shell Thickness/Fe³⁺ Amount	PL Enhancement Factor	Detection Limit	Key Application
Ag@Fe₃O₄ [63]	0.2 g Fe(NO₃)₃	~20x	Not specified	SERS applications
Ag@Fe₃O₄ [63]	0.6 g Fe(NO₃)₃	24.8x	0.1 μM methylene blue	PL-based detection
CsPbBr₃-PQD-COF [64]	Not specified	Not specified	0.3 fM (fluorescence), 2.5 fM (EIS)	Dopamine detection

Table 2: Shell Property Optimization Targets

Parameter	Target Range	Protection Benefit	Optical Benefit
Shell Thickness	5-10 nm [63]	Sufficient barrier against quenching	Optimal fluorescence enhancement
Uniformity	High (low size dispersion)	Consistent protection across PQD population	Reproducible optical properties
Composition	COFs, Fe₃O₄, SiO₂ [64] [63]	Enhanced stability in aqueous environments	Tunable distance-dependent effects

Experimental Protocols

Synthesis of Ag@Fe₃O₄ Core-Shell Nanoparticles with Tunable Shell Thickness

Principle: This protocol describes a one-step solvothermal method for synthesizing magnetic core-shell nanoparticles (Ag@Fe₃O₄) with precisely controllable shell thickness by modulating Fe³⁺ concentration. The shell functions as a spacer to prevent photoluminescence quenching while enabling magnetic separation and reuse [63].

Materials:

• Silver nitrate (AgNO₃, AR)
• Ferric nitrate (Fe(NO₃)₃, AR)
• Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP, GR) - capping agent
• Ethylene glycol (EG, AR) - solvent and reducing agent
• Sodium acetate anhydrous (NaOAc, AR)

Procedure:

• Solution Preparation: Dissolve 0.8 g of PVP in 40 mL of ethylene glycol under vigorous stirring until complete dissolution.
• Precursor Addition: Add 0.2 g of AgNO₃ and varying amounts of Fe(NO₃)₃ (0.2 g, 0.4 g, 0.6 g, 0.8 g, 1.0 g) to separate reaction vessels to create different shell thickness conditions.
• Reaction Mixture: Add 2.0 g of NaOAc to each mixture and stir for 30 minutes to ensure complete homogenization.
• Solvothermal Treatment: Transfer the mixtures to Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclaves and maintain at 200°C for 12 hours.
• Purification: Collect the resulting Ag@Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles magnetically, wash repeatedly with ethanol and deionized water, and dry under vacuum at 60°C for 6 hours.

Critical Parameters:

• Fe³⁺ concentration directly determines shell thickness: higher concentrations yield thicker Fe₃O₄ shells [63]
• Reaction temperature and time must be strictly controlled to ensure uniform shell formation
• PVP concentration affects particle dispersion and prevents aggregation

CsPbBr₃ PQD Integration with COF Matrix for Enhanced Stability

Principle: This protocol details the integration of CsPbBr₃ PQDs within a covalent organic framework (COF) to create a stable nanocomposite for ultrasensitive dopamine detection, leveraging the synergistic effects of fluorescence quenching and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy [64].

Materials:

• CsPbBr₃ PQDs (synthesized via hot-injection method)
• 1,3,5-tris(4-aminophenyl)benzene (TAPB, 97%)
• 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalaldehyde (DHTA, 95%)
• N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF, anhydrous, 99.8%)
• Glacial acetic acid (catalyst)
• Rhodamine B (visual indicator)

Procedure:

• COF Precursor Preparation: Dissolve 0.035 g of TAPB (0.1 mmol) and 0.025 g of DHTA (0.15 mmol) in 5 mL anhydrous DMF.
• Catalyst Addition: Add 100 μL of glacial acetic acid as a catalyst for Schiff-base condensation.
• Framework Formation: Stir the reaction mixture at ambient temperature for 2 hours until a bright yellow suspension forms, indicating extended π-conjugation and framework formation.
• PQD Integration: Introduce pre-synthesized CsPbBr₃ PQDs to the COF precursor solution under gentle stirring to ensure uniform distribution without aggregation.
• Characterization: Confirm successful COF formation through FTIR (characteristic C=N and C-O bands) and XRD (sharp (100) peak at 2θ ≈ 5.8°).

Optimization Notes:

• The highly ordered porous architecture and π-conjugated systems of COFs provide an ideal platform for nanomaterial integration [64]
• COFs protect embedded PQDs while facilitating selective molecular interactions through π-π stacking and hydrogen bonding
• Incorporation of rhodamine B provides a visual green-to-pink color shift at dopamine concentrations above 100 pM, enhancing practical utility [64]

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Key Reagents for Core-Shell PQD Fabrication and Analysis

Reagent/Chemical	Function/Application	Specific Example
CsPbBr₃ PQDs	Fluorescent core material	CsPbBr₃ perovskite QDs with ~85% PLQY for sensing core [64]
Fe₃O₄	Magnetic shell material and spacer	Prevents PL quenching in Ag@Fe₃O₄ structures [63]
Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs)	Porous scaffold for PQD protection	TAPB-DHTA COF for dopamine sensing [64]
Rhodamine B	Visual indicator for colorimetric readout	Green-to-pink shift at DA >100 pM [64]
Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)	Capping agent and stabilizer	Prevents aggregation during NP synthesis [63]
Oleic Acid/Oleylamine	Surface ligands for PQDs	Stabilizes crystal surface during CsPbBr₃ synthesis [64]

Signaling Pathways and Experimental Workflows

Distance-Dependent Fluorescence Quenching/Enhancement Pathway

Core-Shell PQD Synthesis and Optimization Workflow

The precise control of shell thickness and uniformity represents the cornerstone of high-performance core-shell PQD development for advanced sensing applications. Through systematic implementation of the protocols outlined herein, researchers can achieve the delicate balance between maximum protection and minimal optical quenching that is essential for next-generation diagnostic platforms. The quantitative relationships established between shell parameters and functional performance provide a roadmap for optimizing these nanomaterials for specific applications in pharmaceutical research and clinical diagnostics.

The exceptional performance demonstrated by optimized core-shell PQD systems—achieving detection limits as low as 0.3 fM for dopamine and 0.1 μM for methylene blue—highlights the transformative potential of these materials in advancing analytical capabilities for drug development and biomedical research [64] [63]. Future developments will likely focus on multiplexed sensing platforms, smartphone integration, and lead-free alternatives to expand application scope while addressing regulatory requirements.

Enhancing Compatibility with Polar Solvents and Photolithographic Processes for Device Integration

The integration of perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) into advanced optoelectronic devices, such as high-resolution displays for augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR), requires precise microscale patterning. Conventional photolithography, the industry-standard patterning technique, often utilizes polar solvents and harsh chemical conditions that are incompatible with ionic perovskite materials. These processes can strip surface ligands, degrade crystal structure, and quench luminescence, significantly impeding device integration [65] [66]. This application note details two primary strategies—functional photoresist (F-PR) development and direct in-situ photolithography—framed within a core-shell surface protection paradigm to safeguard PQDs during fabrication. The protocols herein are designed to enable the fabrication of high-performance, patterned PQD devices.

Strategic Approaches and Performance Data

Two main strategies have been developed to overcome the compatibility challenge. The first involves designing specialized functional photoresists that protect the PQDs, while the second avoids traditional resists altogether by using the perovskite precursors themselves in a direct patterning process. The quantitative performance of devices fabricated using these methods is summarized in Table 1.

Table 1: Performance Summary of PQDs and Devices Fabricated via Compatible Photolithography Methods

Performance Parameter	Functional Photoresist (F-PR) Strategy	Direct In-Situ Photolithography Strategy	Remarks
Patterning Resolution	Up to 4,200 PPI [65]	Up to 2,450 PPI [66]	Enables subpixels for micro-displays
Feature Size	Information Missing	~2 μm [67] (implied from 6000 PPI)	Suitable for ultra-high-resolution displays
QLED External Quantum Efficiency (EQE)	21.58% [65]	12.7% (Blue) - 20.1% (Green) [67]	Matches performance of unpatterned devices [67]
Photodetector Responsivity	3.98 A W⁻¹ [65]	Information Missing	Demonstrates utility beyond light-emitting applications
PQD Retention after Patterning	Information Missing	Up to 85% [66]	Quantifies non-destructive nature of the process

Core-Shell Protection Strategy: Functional Photoresists (F-PR)

This approach utilizes a custom photoresist formulated with stabilizers and surface ligands that act as a protective "shell" during processing. The F-PR is designed to suppress ligand detachment and surface degradation when in contact with the polar solvents and photoactive compounds in standard lithography [65].

Research Reagent Solutions

Table 2: Key Materials for Functional Photoresist Strategy

Reagent / Material	Function / Role in Core-Shell Protection
AZ GXR-601 Photoresist	Serves as the base resin system (matrix) for the functional photoresist [65].
Stabilizers (e.g., Tetraalkylammonium Salts)	Protects PQD surface by preventing ligand detachment by polar solvents [65].
Surface Ligands (e.g., Oleic Acid)	Maintains surface passivation and optoelectronic properties of PQDs during processing [65].
AZ 300 MIF Developer	Standard developer used to remove unexposed resist areas after patterning [65].
Ethyl Lactate & Butyl Acetate	Solvents used in the base photoresist formulation [65].

Experimental Protocol: F-PR-based Patterning of PQDs

Title: High-Resolution Patterning of PQDs using a Functional Photoresist

Principle: A custom F-PR incorporating stabilizers and ligands is applied to a PQD film. Upon UV exposure through a photomask, the exposed areas become insoluble. Development removes the unexposed F-PR and underlying PQDs, leaving a high-resolution pattern where the PQDs are preserved by the protective components within the resist [65].

Materials:

• Substrate (e.g., glass, silicon wafer)
• Oleic acid-passivated PQDs
• Functional Photoresist (F-PR): Prepared by blending AZ GXR-601, specific stabilizers (e.g., tetraalkylammonium salts), and surface ligands [65].
• AZ 300 MIF Developer
• Spin coater
• UV Mask Aligner
• Hotplate

Procedure:

• Substrate Preparation: Clean the substrate thoroughly with sequential sonication in solvents (e.g., acetone, isopropanol) and dry under a nitrogen stream.
• PQD Film Deposition: Deposit a thin film of oleic acid-capped PQDs onto the substrate via spin-coating.
• F-PR Coating: Spin-coat the prepared F-PR solution directly onto the PQD film.
• Soft Bake: Bake the substrate on a hotplate to evaporate residual solvents from the F-PR layer.
• UV Exposure: Expose the film to UV light through a patterned photomask using a mask aligner.
• Post-Exposure Bake: Perform a mild bake to catalyze the cross-linking reaction in the exposed F-PR regions.
• Development: Immerse the substrate in AZ 300 MIF developer to dissolve the unexposed regions of the F-PR and the underlying PQD film, revealing the negative-tone pattern.
• Rinse and Dry: Rinse the patterned substrate with deionized water and dry under a nitrogen stream.

The following workflow diagram illustrates the F-PR patterning process:

Direct In-Situ Photolithography Strategy

This method bypasses traditional photoresists entirely. It involves the direct patterning of a photosensitive perovskite precursor resist (PPR), where the patterning and PQD formation are separate steps. The core protective mechanism is the in-situ formation of a polymer matrix "shell" around the PQDs during lithography.

Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Key Materials for Direct In-Situ Photolithography Strategy

Reagent / Material	Function / Role in Core-Shell Protection
Perovskite Precursor Salts (e.g., PbBr₂, MABr)	Forms the PQD "core" upon annealing [66].
Multifunctional Thiol Monomer (e.g., TTMP)	Acts as a crosslinker; forms the polymer matrix "shell" via thiol-ene reaction [66].
Ethenyl Monomer (e.g., TAIC)	Reacts with thiol monomer upon UV exposure to form the protective polymer network [66].
Polar Aprotic Solvent (e.g., DMF, DMSO)	Dissolves precursor salts and monomers to form the photosensitive ink [66].
Silane Coupling Agent (e.g., Vinyllsilane)	Functionalizes substrate for strong adhesion of the polymer pattern [66].
Chloroform	Developer solvent to remove unexposed precursor [66].

Experimental Protocol: Direct Patterning of In-Situ Fabricated PQDs

Title: Direct, Non-Destructive Photolithography via Lead Bromide Catalysis

Principle: A photosensitive perovskite precursor resist (PPR) containing precursor salts and polymer monomers is patterned via UV exposure. Lead bromide complexes catalyze a thiol-ene photopolymerization, solidifying the exposed areas. After development, annealing converts the patterned precursor into luminescent PQDs embedded within a protective polymer matrix, which acts as the "shell" [66].

Materials:

• Substrate (glass)
• (3-Aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES) and (3-Mercaptopropyl)trimethoxysilane (MPTES)
• Photosensitive Perovskite Precursor Resist (PPR): Prepared from PbBr₂, MABr, Trimethylolpropane tris(3-mercaptopropionate) (TTMP), and Triallyl isocyanurate (TAIC) in DMF/DMSO [66].
• Chloroform
• Spin coater
• UV Mask Aligner
• Hotplate/Annealing oven

Procedure:

• Substrate Functionalization: Clean the glass substrate and treat it with silane coupling agents (e.g., a mixture of APTES and MPTES) to create a surface with exposed ethenyl or thiol groups for covalent bonding [66].
• PPR Deposition: Cast the PPR solution directly onto the functionalized substrate.
• UV Exposure: Expose the film to UV light (365 nm) through a photomask. The lead bromide complexes catalyze the thiol-ene reaction, crosslinking the monomers in the exposed areas.
• Development: Spin-wash the substrate with chloroform to remove the unexposed, uncured PPR.
• Annealing and PQD Formation: Anneal the patterned film on a hotplate (e.g., 80°C for 10 minutes). This step drives off residual solvent and induces the in-situ nucleation and growth of luminescent PQDs within the protective polymer matrix.

The following workflow diagram illustrates the direct in-situ photolithography process:

The strategies outlined in this document provide robust pathways for integrating sensitive PQDs into device architectures using photolithography. The F-PR approach offers a protective shell using modified resist chemistry, while the direct in-situ method uses a polymer matrix formed during patterning. The choice of strategy depends on the specific requirements for resolution, material compatibility, and process simplicity. Both methods successfully enable the creation of high-resolution, high-performance PQD devices by fundamentally addressing the vulnerability of PQDs to polar solvents and lithographic chemicals through core-shell protection principles.

In the fabrication of advanced core-shell structures for halide perovskite quantum dot (PQD) surface protection, the principles of material removal rate (MRR) and surface quality, though often associated with macroscopic machining, find a critical parallel at the nanoscale. The processes of ligand exchange, surface etching, and shell coating inherently involve the careful removal and addition of material. The ultimate performance of the core-shell PQDs—their optoelectronic properties and environmental stability—is profoundly influenced by the precision and quality of these surface interventions. This application note details the fundamental trade-offs between processing aggressiveness (akin to MRR) and the resulting surface integrity of the PQDs, providing structured quantitative data and detailed experimental protocols to guide researchers in optimizing these parameters for device-grade applications.

Quantitative Data on Processing and Performance

The relationship between processing parameters and the resulting material properties is foundational to rational design. The tables below summarize key quantitative relationships observed in relevant material systems.

Table 1: Impact of Laser Texturing Parameters on Material Removal Rate and Surface Quality (Tungsten Carbide) [68]

Laser Parameter	Parameter Range	Effect on Material Removal Rate (MRR)	Effect on Surface Roughness
Laser Power	Variable (Specific range not detailed)	Increased MRR with higher power	Increased roughness with higher power due to greater thermal impact
Scanning Speed	0.5 - 400 mm/s	Decreased MRR with higher speed	Non-linear relationship; minimum roughness observed at intermediate speeds (~10 mm/s)
Laser Frequency	Variable (Specific range not detailed)	Increased MRR with higher frequency	Decreased roughness with increased frequency up to a point

Table 2: Size-Dependent Properties of Graphene Oxide (GO) Nanosheets and Resulting Macroscopic Film Performance [69]

Property	Small-Sized GO (GO-S)	Medium-Sized GO (GO-M)	Large-Sized GO (GO-L)
Average Lateral Size	~5 μm	~15 μm	~45 μm
Intrinsic Thermal Conductivity	Lower	Medium	Higher (~2-3x that of GO-S)
Morphological Defects	More prevalent	Medium	Fewer
Thermal Conductivity of GO Film	Lower	Medium	Higher

Table 3: Performance Enhancement of Core-Shell PQDs via Hybrid Passivation [42]

Performance Metric	Unpassivated Cs3Bi2Br9 PQDs	Cs3Bi2Br9/DDAB/SiO2 PQDs (Core-Shell)
Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY)	Low (Baseline)	Significantly Enhanced
Environmental Stability	Poor; rapid degradation	Maintained >90% initial efficiency after 8 hours
Solar Cell Power Conversion Efficiency (PCE)	Baseline	Increased from 14.48% to 14.85%

Experimental Protocols for Core-Shell PQD Fabrication and Characterization

Objective: To synthesize stable, lead-free Cs3Bi2Br9 PQDs with didodecyldimethylammonium bromide (DDAB) for surface defect passivation.

Materials:

• Precursors: Cesium bromide (CsBr), Bismuth tribromide (BiBr3)
• Solvents: Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), anhydrous ethanol
• Ligands: Oleic acid (OA), Oleylamine (OAm), Didodecyldimethylammonium bromide (DDAB)
• Equipment: Schlenk line, Syringe pumps, Centrifuge

Procedure:

• Precursor Preparation: Dissolve CsBr (0.2 mmol, 0.0426 g) and BiBr3 (0.3 mmol, 0.1346 g) in 10 mL of DMSO within an inert atmosphere glovebox. Add OA (0.5 mL) and OAm (0.5 mL) as initial coordinating ligands.
• Antisolvent Crystallization: Rapidly inject 1 mL of the transparent precursor solution into 20 mL of vigorously stirred methyl acetate (antisolvent). Immediate crystallization of PQDs occurs.
• DDAB Passivation: Add a defined quantity of DDAB (e.g., 10 mg) to the PQD suspension and stir for 10 minutes. DDAB exchanges with the weakly bound OA/OAm ligands, improving surface coverage and passivating bromine vacancies.
• Purification: Centrifuge the suspension at 9000 rpm for 5 minutes. Discard the supernatant and re-disperse the PQD pellet in a non-polar solvent like hexane or toluene for further use.

Objective: To apply a protective inorganic SiO₂ shell onto passivated PQDs, enhancing environmental stability.

Materials:

• PQD Dispersion: Purified Cs3Bi2Br9/DDAB PQDs in hexane.
• Silica Precursor: Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS).
• Catalyst: Aqueous ammonium hydroxide (NH₄OH).
• Solvent: Anhydrous ethanol.

Procedure:

• Solution Preparation: Transfer the PQD dispersion to a round-bottom flask. Add a controlled volume of ethanol (e.g., 2.4 mL).
• Silica Precursor Addition: Introduce a small, measured amount of TEOS (e.g., 100 µL) to the solution under gentle stirring.
• Catalytic Hydrolysis: Slowly add a dilute solution of NH₄OH in ethanol (e.g., 100 µL of 0.1 M) to initiate the hydrolysis and condensation of TEOS.
• Reaction and Aging: Allow the reaction to proceed for 2-4 hours at room temperature with continuous stirring. The SiO₂ shell forms gradually around the PQD cores.
• Purification: Centrifuge the core-shell PQDs to remove unreacted precursors and re-disperse in an appropriate solvent for device fabrication.

Objective: To experimentally measure the size-dependent intrinsic thermal conductivity of graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets.

Materials:

• Samples: Different-sized GO nanosheets (GO-S, GO-M, GO-L) dispersed in solution.
• Substrate: Atomically flat mica substrate.
• Equipment: Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) with a thermal tip (Scanning Thermal Microscopy, SThM), Centrifuge.

Procedure:

• Sample Preparation: Separate different-sized GO nanosheets (GO-S, GO-M, GO-L) from a bulk dispersion via centrifugation at controlled speeds and times.
• Deposition: Drop-cast the diluted GO dispersions onto a clean mica substrate and allow to dry.
• Topographical Analysis: Use AFM in tapping mode to first identify and map the topography and thickness of individual GO nanosheets.
• Thermal Mapping: Switch to SThM mode using a thermally sensitive probe. Scan the same area of the nanosheet while applying a small heating current to the probe.
• Data Analysis: The heat transfer from the probe to the sample is influenced by the local thermal conductivity. Measure the signal change to quantify the thermal conductivity of nanosheets of different lateral sizes.

Visualization of Core-Shell PQD Fabrication Workflow

The following diagram illustrates the logical sequence and key decision points in the fabrication of stable core-shell PQDs.

Core-Shell PQD Fabrication and Stabilization Pathway

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 4: Essential Materials for Core-Shell PQD Fabrication Research [42] [20]

Reagent / Material	Function in Core-Shell PQD Research	Application Note
Didodecyldimethylammonium Bromide (DDAB)	Organic surface ligand for defect passivation. Exchanges with native long-chain ligands, improving packing density and passivating halide vacancies.	Shorter alkyl chain reduces steric hindrance vs. OA/OAm. Strong affinity for Br⁻ anions enhances stability [42].
Tetraethyl Orthosilicate (TEOS)	Inorganic precursor for SiO₂ shell coating via a sol-gel reaction. Forms a dense, amorphous protective layer.	Hydrolysis is catalyzed by ammonium hydroxide. Coating thickness is controlled by TEOS volume and reaction time [42].
Oleic Acid (OA) / Oleylamine (OAm)	Standard long-chain ligands used during initial PQD synthesis to control growth and provide colloidal stability.	Kinked cis-configuration leads to suboptimal surface coverage, making them prone to detachment—a key source of instability [20].
Methyl Acetate	Antisolvent used to precipitate PQDs from the precursor solution (Ligand-Assisted Reprecipitation, LARP).	Used in purification steps to remove excess precursors and by-products, but can also cause ligand detachment [42] [20].
Graphene Oxide (GO) Nanosheets	2D material studied as a functional filler or barrier layer in composite coatings.	Larger lateral sheet size correlates with higher intrinsic thermal conductivity due to fewer morphological defects [69].

Benchmarking Performance: Stability, Sensitivity, and Clinical Potential

The integration of core-shell architectures represents a transformative strategy for enhancing the performance and durability of photoluminescent materials, particularly Perovskite Quantum Dots (PQDs). These structures consist of a core material encapsulated by a protective shell, a design that synergistically combines the superior optoelectronic properties of the core with the enhanced stability provided by the shell. This application note details standardized protocols for the critical quantification of two key parameters for core-shell PQDs: Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY) and environmental stability metrics. Accurate measurement of these properties is essential for evaluating the success of surface protection strategies and advancing the application of PQDs in next-generation optoelectronic devices, from displays to photoredox catalysts [70] [71].

The core-shell paradigm mitigates the inherent sensitivity of PQDs to environmental factors such as oxygen, moisture, and heat. By applying a robust shell, the core is shielded from degradation, which directly translates to the preservation of its luminescent efficiency over time. This document, framed within broader thesis research on core-shell fabrication for PQD protection, provides researchers with detailed methodologies to reliably measure and report the performance enhancements achieved through their synthetic efforts [72] [73].

Theoretical Background and Key Metrics

Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY), denoted as ΦPL, is a dimensionless figure of merit defined as the ratio of photons emitted to photons absorbed by a luminescent material. It is a direct measure of the efficiency of the radiative recombination process. For core-shell PQDs, an high ΦPL indicates not only an intrinsically efficient core but also successful surface passivation by the shell, which reduces non-radiative recombination pathways at trap states [70] [74].

The relationship between ΦPL and the excited-state dynamics is given by: ΦPL = kr / (kr + knr) where kr is the radiative rate constant and knr is the non-radiative rate constant. The PL lifetime (τ), a complementary metric, is defined as τ = 1/(kr + knr). A core-shell structure that effectively passivates surface defects typically leads to an increase in ΦPL, often accompanied by a change in τ, as knr is suppressed [70].

Beyond initial efficiency, environmental stability is a critical performance indicator. For core-shell PQDs, this is quantified by monitoring the temporal evolution of ΦPL and other properties under controlled stress conditions. Key stability tests include:

• Thermal Stability: Monitoring ΦPL decay at elevated temperatures.
• Photostability: Tracking ΦPL under continuous illumination.
• Ambient (Chemical) Stability: Observing ΦPL changes under controlled humidity and oxygen levels [73].

The following diagram illustrates the core-shell concept for PQD protection and the associated photophysical processes and stability challenges.

Experimental Protocols for PLQY Measurement

Accurate determination of PLQY is fundamental for evaluating core-shell enhancement. Both absolute and relative methods are employed, with the integrating sphere method being the gold standard for absolute measurement.

Absolute PLQY Measurement Using an Integrating Sphere

This method is ideal for solid films and scattering suspensions of core-shell PQDs, as it captures all emitted photons regardless of direction [74] [75].

Sample Preparation Protocol:

• Solid Films: Prepare core-shell PQD films on clean, optically flat substrates (e.g., quartz, glass). Ensure the film is uniform and free from pinholes. The optimal optical density at the excitation wavelength should be between 0.1 and 0.2 to minimize re-absorption effects while providing a strong signal [70].
• Solution/Suspension: For PQDs in solution, use a spectroscopically compatible, non-fluorescent solvent. Ensure the sample is homogeneous. Degas the solution with an inert gas (e.g., N₂, Ar) if the PQDs are sensitive to oxygen quenching [70].

Measurement Procedure:

• Setup Configuration: Place the sample inside the integrating sphere, ensuring it does not block the port. The excitation beam should be directed onto the sample without hitting the sphere wall directly.
• Spectral Acquisition: Acquire three emission spectra using the sphere's spectrometer:
  • ( L{sample}(\lambda) ): Spectrum with the sample in place, excited by the laser/light source.
  • ( E{sample}(\lambda) ): Spectrum with the sample in place, but with the excitation beam blocked from the sample and directly hitting the sphere wall (measures direct excitation absorption by the sample).
  • ( E_{blank}(\lambda) ): Spectrum of the empty sphere (or a non-absorbing reference like the substrate) with the excitation beam hitting the wall (measures the incident light profile) [74] [75].
• Data Calculation: Calculate the PLQY using the equation: [ \Phi{PL} = \frac{\int L{sample}(\lambda)d\lambda - \int E{sample}(\lambda)d\lambda}{\int E{blank}(\lambda)d\lambda - \int E_{sample}(\lambda)d\lambda} ] This formula effectively quantifies the total emitted photons relative to the total absorbed photons. Modern instruments like the Hamamatsu Quantaurus-QY automate this acquisition and calculation process [74].

Common Pitfalls and Mitigation:

• Re-absorption/Inner Filter Effect: Caused by overlap of absorption and emission spectra, leading to underestimated ΦPL. Mitigate by using optically thin samples or advanced correction models like Monte Carlo simulations [75].
• Scattering Effects: In colloidal suspensions, significant scattering can distort measurements. The use of an integrating sphere and specialized models that account for scattering is critical for accurate results [75].
• Oxygen Sensitivity: For phosphorescent or TADF materials, oxygen can quench the excited state. Always degas samples and use sealed cuvettes for measurement [70].

Relative PLQY Measurement

This method compares the unknown sample to a standard with a known ΦPL. It requires the standard to have a similar absorption profile and emission wavelength range, and be measured under identical instrumental conditions (e.g., slit widths, detector settings) [70] [74].

Protocol:

• Standard Selection: Choose a well-characterized standard (e.g., Rhodamine 6G in ethanol, ΦPL ≈ 0.95, for green/red emitters; Quinine sulfate in sulfuric acid for blue emitters) [75].
• Matching Absorbance: Prepare the standard and core-shell PQD sample solutions to have nearly identical absorbance (< 0.1) at the same excitation wavelength.
• Spectral Measurement: Record the corrected emission spectra of both standard and sample using the same instrument settings.
• Calculation: Calculate the unknown ΦPL using: [ \Phi{PL}^{sample} = \Phi{PL}^{standard} \times \frac{I{sample}}{I{standard}} \times \frac{A{standard}}{A{sample}} \times \frac{\eta{sample}^2}{\eta{standard}^2} ] where ( I ) is the integrated emission intensity, ( A ) is the absorbance at the excitation wavelength, and ( \eta ) is the refractive index of the solvent.

Protocols for Environmental Stability Assessment

Quantifying stability is crucial for demonstrating the efficacy of the core-shell structure. The following table summarizes key stability tests and their quantification methods.

Table 1: Summary of Environmental Stability Tests for Core-Shell PQDs

Stress Factor	Test Protocol	Key Metrics & Data Reporting	Application to Core-Shell PQDs
Thermal Stability	Incubate solid films or solutions in a controlled temperature oven or hot stage. Typical test temperatures: 50°C, 85°C, 100°C.	- Normalized ΦPL vs. Time- T50 (Time for ΦPL to drop to 50% of initial)- PL Lifetime (τ) vs. Time- Plot degradation curves at multiple temperatures.	The shell inhibits thermally induced ion migration and decomposition in the perovskite core, leading to a higher T50.
Photostability	Subject samples to constant illumination from a high-power LED or laser at a defined wavelength and power density. Maintain temperature control.	- Normalized ΦPL vs. Cumulative Photon Dose- Photobleaching Half-Life- Evolution of Emission Spectra (peak shift, FWHM change).	The shell acts as a barrier against photo-induced oxidative damage, slowing the rate of photobleaching.
Ambient (Chemical) Stability	Place samples in an environmental chamber with controlled relative humidity (e.g., 50%, 80% RH) and ambient oxygen.	- Normalized ΦPL vs. Time- Visual Inspection & Photography- T50 at specific RH- Complementary techniques: XRD to track crystal structure.	A high-quality, pinhole-free shell prevents hydration and oxidation of the perovskite core, drastically improving lifetime under high humidity.

The workflow for a comprehensive stability study, integrating multiple stress tests and data analysis, is outlined below.

Core-Shell Fabrication and Material Considerations

The choice of shell material and fabrication method directly impacts the enhancement in PLQY and stability. Common shell materials include metal oxides (e.g., ZnO, TiO₂), silica (SiO₂), insulating polymers, and other wide-bandgap semiconductors [71] [72] [73].

Exemplary Fabrication Protocol: SiO₂ Shell on PQD Core via Sol-Gel Method This method is widely used to create a conformal, inert silica shell [73].

• Synthesis of Core PQDs: Synthesize PQDs (e.g., CsPbBr₃) using standard hot-injection or ligand-assisted reprecipitation methods.
• Surface Ligand Exchange: Functionalize the PQD surface with silane-coupling agents (e.g., (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane - APTES) to promote silica adhesion.
• Shell Growth: Redisperse the functionalized PQDs in a mixture of ethanol and water. Slowly add a silica precursor, typically tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), under mild stirring. The hydrolysis and condensation of TEOS are catalyzed by ammonium hydroxide, leading to the formation of a SiO₂ layer on the PQD surface.
• Purification: Isolate the core-shell nanoparticles via centrifugation and wash repeatedly with ethanol to remove unreacted precursors.
• Characterization: Confirm shell formation and thickness using Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). Proceed with PLQY and stability measurements as detailed in previous sections [73].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Successful fabrication and testing of core-shell PQDs require a range of specialized materials and instruments. The following table lists key items and their functions.

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents and Equipment for Core-Shell PQD Studies

Category/Item	Specific Examples	Function in Research
Core Materials	CsPbX₃ (X=Cl, Br, I), FAPbX₃ PQDs	The photoactive light-emitting core of the structure.
Shell Precursors	Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), Zinc acetate, Polypyrrole (PPy)	Reactants used to form the protective shell (e.g., SiO₂, ZnO, conductive polymer) around the core PQD [72] [73].
Surface Ligands	Oleic Acid, Oleylamine, (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES)	Stabilize nanocrystal surfaces and provide functional groups for subsequent shell growth [73].
Solvents	n-Hexane, Toluene, Ethanol, Dichloromethane (DCM)	Disperse PQDs, dissolve precursors, and for purification steps.
Absolute PLQY System	Integrating Sphere with Spectrometer (e.g., Hamamatsu Quantaurus-QY)	Directly measures the absolute photoluminescence quantum yield without a standard, crucial for solid films [74].
Fluorescence Lifetime Spectrometer	Time-Correlated Single Photon Counting (TCSPC) systems (e.g., Quantaurus-Tau)	Measures the photoluminescence lifetime (τ), providing insight into excited-state dynamics and recombination pathways [70] [74].
UV-Vis Spectrophotometer	Cary Series UV-Vis Spectrophotometers	Measures the absorption spectrum and molar absorptivity of the core-shell PQDs.
Accelerated Aging Testers	Environmental Chambers, Hot Plates, High-Power LED Light Sources	Apply controlled stress (heat, light, humidity) for stability testing.

The methodologies outlined in this application note provide a standardized framework for quantitatively evaluating the enhancements in PLQY and environmental stability afforded by core-shell structures in PQDs. The rigorous application of absolute PLQY measurement protocols and systematic stability testing is paramount for objectively comparing different core-shell architectures and shell materials. Adherence to these detailed protocols will enable researchers to generate reliable, reproducible, and high-quality data, thereby accelerating the development of robust and highly efficient PQD materials for commercial applications. As the field progresses, these quantification standards will be essential for establishing structure-property relationships that guide the rational design of next-generation core-shell nanocrystals.

Quantum dots (QDs) are nanoscale semiconductor particles, typically between 1 to 10 nm in size, whose unique optical and electronic properties arise from quantum confinement effects [76]. Their emission wavelengths can be precisely tuned by varying their size and composition, making them highly versatile for numerous applications [76]. This analysis focuses on comparing three primary classes of QDs: traditional semiconductor QDs (e.g., CdTe/ZnS), perovskite quantum dots (PQDs), and carbon quantum dots (CQDs). A critical advancement for enhancing the performance and stability of many QDs, especially perovskites and traditional semiconductors, is the fabrication of core-shell structures, which is a central theme in broader thesis research on PQD surface protection [22] [77].

The core-shell architecture involves encapsulating the QD core with a protective shell material. This shell passivates surface defects, suppresses non-radiative recombination, and shields the core from environmental degradation, thereby significantly improving photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY), stability, and biocompatibility [77]. For instance, a ZnS shell on a CdTe core enhances quantum efficiency and stability for biosensing applications [77]. Similarly, shell engineering in PQDs is a key strategy to address their inherent instability, locking in their exceptional optoelectronic properties [22].

Comparative Quantitative Analysis of QD Properties

The following tables summarize key characteristics and performance metrics of the different QD classes.

Table 1: Core Characteristics and Synthesis of Different QD Classes

QD Class	Core Composition Examples	Core Size Range	Key Optical Properties	Primary Synthesis Approaches
Core-Shell PQDs	CsPbX₃ (X=Cl, Br, I) [22]	1-10 nm [22]	PLQY ≈100%, Narrow FWHM, Wide color gamut [22]	Femtosecond laser processing, Colloidal synthesis [22]
Carbon Dots (CQDs)	Carbon-based structure [78]	<10 nm [78] [79]	Tunable fluorescence, Excitation-dependent emission [78] [79]	Hydrothermal, Microwave-assisted, Pyrolysis from green precursors [79] [80]
Traditional Core-Shell QDs	CdSe/ZnS, CdTe/ZnS [76] [77]	1-10 nm [76]	High QY, Size-tunable emission [76]	Colloidal synthesis in aqueous/organic phases [77]

Table 2: Performance and Application Comparison

Parameter	Core-Shell PQDs	Carbon Dots (CQDs)	Traditional Core-Shell QDs
Quantum Yield (QY)	Approaching 100% [22]	Up to 83% (CDCQDs) [79]	High (Enhanced by shell) [77]
Stability	Moderate; improved by shelling [22]	High (chemical & photostability) [80]	High (Excellent with shell) [77]
Toxicity Concern	Low to Moderate (Lead content) [22]	Very Low [78] [80]	High (Cadmium, etc.) [76] [80]
Key Advantage	Exceptional color purity, tunability [22]	Biocompatibility, green synthesis [79] [80]	Proven performance, high QY [76]
Primary Application Focus	Displays, LEDs, Lasers [22]	Biosensing, Bioimaging, Drug Delivery [78] [79]	Biosensing (e.g., metabolite detection) [77]

Experimental Protocols

Protocol: Aqueous Synthesis of CdTe/ZnS Core-Shell QDs

This protocol details the synthesis of water-soluble, MPA-capped CdTe/ZnS core/shell QDs for sensing applications, adapted from [77].

Research Reagent Solutions

Reagent/Solution	Function in the Protocol
Cadmium Chloride (CdCl₂)	Source of Cd²⁺ ions for core formation
Mercaptopropionic Acid (MPA)	Capping ligand; provides surface stability and water solubility
Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH)	Adjusts pH for optimal precursor reaction
Tellurium (Te) Powder	Source of Tellurium
Sodium Borohydride (NaBH₄)	Reducing agent for NaHTe solution preparation
Zinc Chloride (ZnCl₂)	Source of Zn²⁺ ions for shell formation
Sodium Sulfide Nonahydrate (Na₂S·9H₂O)	Source of S²⁻ ions for shell formation
Nitrogen (N₂) Gas	Creates inert atmosphere to prevent oxidation

Step-by-Step Procedure

• Cadmium Precursor Preparation: In a three-necked flask, mix CdCl₂ and MPA in a molar ratio of 1:2 in double-distilled water (ddw). Adjust the pH of the solution to 11 using a 2 M NaOH solution. Purge the solution with nitrogen gas at room temperature to create an inert atmosphere [77].
• NaHTe Solution Preparation: In a separate vial, mix Te powder and NaBH₄ in a molar ratio of 1:3. First, hold the mixture under vacuum for 10 minutes, then switch to a nitrogen atmosphere. Add 10 mL of ddw and maintain the solution at 80°C for 30 minutes, resulting in a freshly prepared pink-purple NaHTe solution [77].
• CdTe Core Synthesis: Inject the NaHTe solution into the cadmium precursor solution under stirring. Heat the reaction mixture to 100°C and reflux for 2 hours to form the CdTe core QDs [77].
• ZnS Shell Solution Preparation: Dissolve ZnCl₂ and Na₂S·9H₂O (5 mmol each) in 15 mL of ddw. Stir this solution under vacuum for 10 minutes followed by 1 hour under nitrogen at 100°C [77].
• Shell Growth: Add the ZnS solution dropwise to the CdTe core QDs solution. Continue stirring the reaction mixture at 100°C for 2 hours to allow the formation of the core/shell structure. The resulting CdTe/ZnS QDs can be purified and stored for characterization and application [77].

Protocol: Femtosecond Laser Processing for PQD Patterning

This protocol describes a high-precision technique for fabricating patterned PQDs, crucial for device integration [22].

Step-by-Step Procedure

• Precursor Preparation: Prepare a stable perovskite precursor solution or a solid transparent medium (e.g., polymer, glass) doped with the precursor ions [22].
• Laser Setup: Configure a femtosecond laser system with appropriate wavelength and pulse energy. Focus the laser beam through a high-numerical-aperture objective lens for precise 3D control within the transparent material [22].
• Laser-Induced Crystallization: Direct the focused femtosecond laser beam according to the desired 2D or 3D pattern. The extremely short, high-intensity pulses induce non-linear multiphoton absorption and non-resonant ionization at the focal volume, leading to localized crystallization of PQDs within the precursor medium without damaging the surrounding material [22].
• Post-Processing: After patterning, any unreacted precursor may be removed, if necessary, leaving behind a high-resolution, stable pattern of PQDs embedded in the matrix [22].

Application Workflows and Signaling Pathways

The application of core-shell QDs in biosensing often relies on fluorescence modulation mechanisms. The following diagram illustrates a FRET-based quenching mechanism, a common pathway for metabolite detection using core-shell QDs.

FRET-Based Metabolite Detection. The workflow illustrates the signaling mechanism where analyte binding induces fluorescence quenching via Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET), enabling sensitive detection [77].

The synthesis and selection of QDs for specific applications is a structured process, as summarized below.

QD Selection and Synthesis Strategy. A decision workflow for selecting the appropriate QD type based on application priorities, highlighting the universal utility of the core-shell strategy.

Core-shell structuring has emerged as a pivotal strategy in perovskite quantum dot (PQD) research, primarily aimed at enhancing environmental stability and optimizing optoelectronic performance. This application note provides a comparative evaluation of lead-based and lead-free core-shell PQDs, framing the analysis within a broader thesis on surface protection strategies. The ionic nature of perovskites and their high surface energy make them susceptible to degradation from external factors such as moisture, oxygen, and heat [81]. Core-shell architectures address these instability issues by forming a protective layer that passivates surface defects, suppresses ion migration, and shields the sensitive perovskite core from environmental stressors [82]. For lead-based PQDs, this approach primarily targets performance preservation and longevity enhancement. For lead-free alternatives, which inherently address toxicity concerns but often suffer from inferior optoelectronic properties and stability, core-shell engineering becomes crucial for making them viable for practical applications [81] [42]. This document synthesizes recent advancements in core-shell PQDs, providing structured performance data, detailed experimental protocols, and analytical frameworks to guide researchers and development professionals in selecting and implementing these materials for optoelectronic and biomedical applications.

Performance and Material Properties Comparison

The strategic development of core-shell PQDs diverges significantly based on the core composition. Lead-based systems typically employ core-shell engineering to enhance already superior optical properties and environmental resistance, whereas lead-free systems require this architecture to achieve baseline viability for practical applications [81] [42].

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Lead-Based and Lead-Free Core-Shell PQD Systems

Property / System	Lead-Based (CsPbX₃)	Lead-Free (Cs₃Bi₂Br₉)	Lead-Free (Double Perovskites)
Typical Core-Shell Structure	CsPbBr₃ @ SiO₂ [82] [42]	Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ @ DDAB/SiO₂ [42]	Cs₂AgBiCl₆ @ Shell [81]
Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY)	Can exceed 90% [81]	Enhanced via hybrid passivation [42]	Generally lower than lead-based counterparts [81]
Emission Wavelength Tunability	Excellent (Whole visible spectrum) [81]	Limited (e.g., Blue ~485 nm) [42]	Moderate [81]
Stability Enhancement	Improved thermal & chemical stability [82]	Significant improvement in ambient stability [42]	Improved, but requires further development [81]
Key Shell/Passivation Materials	SiO₂, Polymers, DDAB [82] [42]	DDAB, SiO₂ [42]	Organic ligands, inorganic oxides [81]
Toxicity Concern	High (Pb²⁺ release) [83]	Low (Bi³⁺ based) [42]	Low [81]
Primary Application Focus	Solar cells, LEDs, Photodetectors [81] [82]	Flexible electroluminescence, Photovoltaics [42]	Photocatalysis, Non-toxic optoelectronics [81]

Stability and Toxicity Analysis

The core-shell paradigm fundamentally addresses the most critical limitations of PQDs: instability and toxicity.

• Stability Mechanisms: The protective shell functions through multiple mechanisms. It physically isolates the PQD core from environmental degrading factors like moisture and oxygen [82]. It effectively passivates surface defects and dangling bonds, which are primary sites for non-radiative recombination and ion migration, thereby enhancing both optical performance and structural integrity [82] [42]. Furthermore, a robust shell can inhibit the coalescence and aggregation of PQDs during processing and operation [81].

• Toxicity and Regulatory Considerations: Lead toxicity remains a significant barrier to the commercialization of lead-halide PQDs, particularly in consumer electronics and biomedical applications [81] [83]. Studies indicate that Pb²⁺ release from lead-based compositions typically exceeds permitted levels for parenteral administration [83]. In contrast, bismuth-based PQDs (e.g., Cs₃Bi₂Br₉) already meet current safety standards without requiring additional coating, presenting a more viable path for applications involving biological contact or environmental disposal [83] [42].

Experimental Protocols for Core-Shell PQD Fabrication

The synthesis of high-quality core-shell PQDs requires precise control over nucleation, growth, and surface encapsulation. The following protocols detail standardized methodologies for fabricating both lead-free and lead-based systems.

Protocol 1: Synthesis of Lead-Free Cs₃Bi₂Br₉/DDAB/SiO₂ Core-Shell QDs

This protocol outlines the synthesis of stable, low-toxicity Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ PQDs with a hybrid organic-inorganic shell for enhanced performance [42].

I. Reagents and Materials

• Precursors: Cesium Bromide (CsBr, 0.2 mmol), Bismuth Tribromide (BiBr₃, 0.3 mmol).
• Solvents: Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO), anhydrous ethanol.
• Ligands: Oleic Acid (OA, 99.5%), Oleamine (OAm, 99.99%), Didodecyldimethylammonium Bromide (DDAB, 98%).
• Shell Precursor: Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, 99%).
• Antisolvent: Toluene.
• Ambient Conditions: Synthesis performed under ambient temperature and pressure.

II. Equipment

• Centrifuge
• Ultrasonic cleaner
• Magnetic stirrer with hotplate
• UV-Vis Spectrophotometer
• Photoluminescence (PL) Spectrometer
• Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM)

III. Step-by-Step Procedure

Part A: Synthesis of Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ PQD Core

• Precursor Preparation: In a glass vial, dissolve CsBr (0.2 mmol, 0.0426 g) and BiBr₃ (0.3 mmol, 0.132 g) in 10 mL of DMSO. Add 0.5 mL of OA and 0.5 mL of OAm as stabilizing ligands.
• Stirring: Stir the mixture vigorously for 60 minutes at room temperature until a transparent solution is formed.
• Antisolvent Crystallization: Add 0.4 mL of the transparent precursor solution dropwise into 20 mL of toluene under continuous stirring.
• Centrifugation: Immediately after adding the precursor, centrifuge the mixture at 7000 rpm for 10 minutes to collect the precipitated PQDs.
• Washing: Discard the supernatant and re-disperse the pellet in 10 mL of toluene. Repeat the centrifugation and washing step twice to remove unreacted precursors and excess ligands.

Part B: Surface Passivation with DDAB

• Ligand Exchange: Add 10 mg of DDAB to the purified Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ PQD solution in toluene.
• Stirring: Stir the mixture for 30 minutes at 40°C to allow the DDAB to effectively passivate surface defects.
• Purification: Precipitate the DDAB-passivated PQDs by adding anhydrous ethanol, followed by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 5 minutes. Re-disperse the final product in toluene.

Part C: Inorganic SiO₂ Shell Coating

• Silica Precursor Addition: To the DDAB-passivated PQD solution, add 2.4 mL of TEOS.
• Hydrolysis and Condensation: Sonicate the mixture for 3 hours. During this process, the TEOS hydrolyzes and condenses, forming an amorphous SiO₂ layer on the PQD surface.
• Product Collection: Centrifuge the final Cs₃Bi₂Br₉/DDAB/SiO₂ product at 8000 rpm for 5 minutes, wash with ethanol, and store in toluene.

IV. Characterization and Analysis

• Optical Properties: Measure absorption and photoluminescence (PL) spectra. The Cs₃Bi₂Br₉/DDAB/SiO₂ PQDs typically exhibit blue emission at approximately 485 nm [42].
• Morphology: Analyze the size and morphology of the PQDs using TEM. The core-shell particles should appear as uniform quasi-spherical nanoparticles with an average size of ~12 nm [42].
• Stability Assessment: Monitor the PL intensity of the PQD solutions over time under ambient conditions to evaluate the enhancement in environmental stability provided by the core-shell structure.

Protocol 2: In Situ Formation of CH₃NH₃PbI₃ (MAP) Shell on PbS QDs

This protocol describes a two-step spin-coating method to form a perovskite shell on lead sulfide QDs, significantly improving the performance of sensitized solar cells [84].

I. Reagents and Materials

• Substrate: mp-TiO₂/c-TiO₂/FTO glass substrate.
• PbS Precursors: 5 mM Lead Iodide (PbI₂) in N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF), 5 mM Sodium Sulfide (Na₂S) in methanol/water (95:5), EDT solution in acetonitrile (1:99).
• MAP Shell Precursors: PbI₂ in DMF, Methylammonium Iodide (MAI) in 2-propanol (0.035 M).
• Ambient Conditions: Shell formation steps performed under an argon atmosphere.

II. Equipment

• Spin Coater
• Tube Furnace
• Solar Simulator
• Potentiostat (for J-V measurements)
• Time-Resolved Photoluminescence (TRPL) Spectrometer

III. Step-by-Step Procedure

Part A: PbS QD Sensitization on mp-TiO₂ via S-SILAR

• Substrate Preparation: Prepare a mesoporous TiO₂ (mp-TiO₂) film on a compact TiO₂ (c-TiO₂)/FTO glass substrate.
• Successive Ionic Layer Adsorption and Reaction (S-SILAR):
  • Step 1 (Pb²⁺ Adsorption): Spin-coat 100 µL of 5 mM PbI₂ solution in DMF onto the mp-TiO₂ substrate at 1500 rpm for 20 seconds.
  • Step 2 (S²⁻ Reaction): Spin-coat 100 µL of 5 mM Na₂S solution at 1500 rpm for 20 seconds. This forms PbS QDs within the TiO₂ mesopores.
  • Step 3 (Ligand Exchange): Spin-coat 100 µL of the EDT/acetonitrile solution at 1500 rpm for 20 seconds to passivate the PbS QD surface.
• Repetition: Repeat this S-SILAR cycle 20 times to achieve sufficient sensitization.

Part B: In Situ MAP Shell Formation

• PbI₂ Infiltration: Infiltrate the mp-TiO₂/PbS-EDT structure with PbI₂ by spin-coating 200 µL of a PbI₂ solution in DMF at 4000 rpm for 30 seconds.
• Drying: Dry the film at 70°C for 30 minutes in an argon atmosphere.
• Conversion to Perovskite: Drop 100 µL of the MAI solution (0.035 M in 2-propanol) onto the layer and dry at 70°C for 10 minutes. A rapid color change to dark brown indicates the formation of the CH₃NH₃PbI₃ (MAP) shell around the PbS QDs [84].

IV. Characterization and Analysis

• Solar Cell Performance: Measure current density-voltage (J-V) characteristics under AM 1.5G illumination (100 mW/cm²). An optimal MAP shell thickness (~0.34 nm) can boost power conversion efficiency (PCE) from 0.7% to 4.1% [84].
• Carrier Dynamics: Perform Time-Resolved Photoluminescence (TRPL) and Transient Photovoltage (TPV) measurements to analyze the suppression of charge carrier recombination at surface defects.
• Chemical Stability: Use X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) to confirm that the MAP shell prevents the oxidation of PbS QDs, thereby enhancing air stability.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 2: Key Reagent Solutions for Core-Shell PQD Research

Reagent/Material	Function/Application	Example Use-Case
Didodecyldimethylammonium Bromide (DDAB)	Surface passivator for defect reduction and stability enhancement [42].	Organic passivation layer in Cs₃Bi₂Br₉/DDAB/SiO₂ PQDs [42].
Tetraethyl Orthosilicate (TEOS)	Precursor for inorganic SiO₂ shell coating [42].	Forms a dense, amorphous SiO₂ protective layer on PQDs [42].
Oleic Acid (OA) & Oleamine (OAm)	Standard surface ligands for colloidal synthesis and stabilization [42].	Used during the initial synthesis of Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ PQD cores to control growth and prevent aggregation [42].
Methylammonium Iodide (MAI)	Organic cation precursor for hybrid perovskite formation [84].	Reacts with PbI₂ to form the CH₃NH₃PbI₃ (MAP) shell on PbS QDs [84].
Lead Iodide (PbI₂)	Source of Pb²⁺ and I⁻ ions for lead-based perovskite formation [84].	Core component for forming the MAP shell in PbS@MAP core-shell structures [84].
Bismuth Tribromide (BiBr₃)	Source of Bi³⁺ and Br⁻ ions for lead-free perovskite formation [42].	Metal source for synthesizing lead-free Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ PQD cores [42].

Core-Shell Strategy and Application Workflows

The following diagrams visualize the logical relationships in core-shell design and the experimental workflow for fabrication.

Core-Shell Design Logic for PQD Surface Protection

Hybrid Core-Shell PQD Fabrication Workflow

The strategic implementation of core-shell structures presents a compelling pathway to simultaneously address the performance and safety challenges of perovskite quantum dots. For lead-based PQDs, core-shell engineering is primarily a performance-enhancing and stabilizing technology, elevating their already superior optoelectronic properties to meet the rigorous demands of commercial applications like displays and photovoltaics [81] [82]. For lead-free PQDs, core-shell architecture is an enabling technology, essential for making these environmentally friendly alternatives functionally viable by significantly boosting their stability and luminescent efficiency [42].

Future research should focus on developing more scalable and precise shell-coating techniques, such as femtosecond laser processing for high-resolution patterning [22], and exploring novel shell compositions. The ultimate goal is the realization of optimized, industry-ready core-shell PQDs that do not force a trade-off between outstanding performance and environmental and biological safety, thereby accelerating their integration into next-generation optoelectronic and biomedical devices.

Within the broader research on core-shell structured perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) for enhanced surface protection, validating their stability and detection performance in complex biological matrices is a critical step toward practical clinical and diagnostic applications. The integration of PQDs into biosensing and bioimaging platforms requires a rigorous demonstration of their resilience in environments such as serum, as well as the reliability of analytical methods used for their quantification. This application note provides detailed protocols and data for assessing the serum stability of PQDs and for validating the bioanalytical methods used to detect target analytes in complex matrices, supporting their use in drug development and clinical research.

Experimental Protocols

Bioanalytical Method Validation using LC-MS/MS

The reliability of data generated for PQD stability or drug quantification in biological matrices hinges on a thoroughly validated analytical method. The following protocol, adapted from validated bioanalytical procedures, outlines the steps for method development and validation using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) [85] [86].

Sample Preparation via Liquid-Liquid Extraction

• Aliquot Sample: Pipette 50 µL of biological matrix (e.g., rat plasma, human serum) into a microcentrifuge tube. For tissues, use 100 µL of homogenized supernatant.
• Add Internal Standard (IS): Add 100 µL of the internal standard solution (e.g., 500 ng/mL appropriate IS in methanol-water (1:1, v/v)) to correct for variability in sample processing and ionization.
• Alkalinization: Add 50 µL of a 0.3 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution to create optimal conditions for extraction.
• Liquid-Liquid Extraction: Add 3 mL of an organic extraction solvent mixture, such as ether-dichloromethane (3:2, v/v).
• Mix and Separate: Vortex the mixture for 1 minute, followed by shaking for 15 minutes to ensure thorough mixing. Centrifuge at 3000 rpm for 5 minutes to separate the organic and aqueous layers.
• Evaporation and Reconstitution: Transfer the clear upper organic layer to a new tube and evaporate to dryness under a stream of warm air (40°C). Reconstitute the residue in 300 µL of mobile phase and inject 20 µL into the LC-MS/MS system [85].

LC-MS/MS Analysis Conditions

• Chromatography:
  • Column: Zorbax C18 (50 × 2.1 mm, 3.5 µm) or equivalent.
  • Mobile Phase: Methanol, acetonitrile, and 10 mmol/L acetic acid (45:45:10, v/v/v).
  • Flow Rate: 0.4 mL/min.
  • Column Temperature: 40°C.
  • Run Time: ~2.4 - 15 minutes, depending on the method [85] [86].
• Mass Spectrometry:
  • Ion Source: Electrospray Ionization (ESI), positive mode.
  • Ion Spray Voltage: 4800 V.
  • Source Temperature: 320°C.
  • Detection: Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM). Specific transitions are compound-dependent (e.g., for 20(S)-Protopanaxadiol: m/z 461.6 → 425.5) [85].

Method Validation Parameters

A comprehensive validation must be performed in accordance with guidelines from regulatory bodies like the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) or the FDA [87] [85] [86]. The table below summarizes the key parameters and acceptance criteria.

Table 1: Key Parameters for Bioanalytical Method Validation

Validation Parameter	Description	Acceptance Criteria
Selectivity	Assesses interference from the blank matrix.	Response in blank matrix ≤ 20% of LLOQ for analyte and ≤ 5% for IS.
Linearity & Calibration Curve	Relationship between analyte concentration and response.	Coefficient of determination (r) ≥ 0.99. RSD ≤ 15% at each level (LLOQ ≤ 20%).
Accuracy & Precision	Closeness (Accuracy) and reproducibility (Precision) of measured values.	Accuracy within ±15% of nominal concentration (LLOQ ±20%). Precision (CV) ≤ 15% (LLOQ ≤ 20%).
Extraction Recovery	Efficiency of the sample preparation process.	Consistent and reproducible recovery, typically evaluated at QC levels.
Matrix Effect	Impact of the biological matrix on analyte ionization.	Matrix factor should be consistent and demonstrate no significant suppression or enhancement.
Stability	Analyte stability under various storage and handling conditions.	Must be established for bench-top, processed sample, freeze-thaw, and long-term storage conditions.

Assessing Perovskite Quantum Dot (PQD) Serum Stability

The following workflow details the process for evaluating the stability of core-shell PQDs in serum, a critical test for their applicability in biological environments.

Data Presentation and Analysis

Stability Performance of Engineered Materials

The pursuit of stable materials in complex environments is demonstrated by recent advances in perovskite quantum dot (PQD) technology. Core-shell structures and novel passivation methods have shown remarkable improvements in long-term stability and performance.

Table 2: Stability Performance of Engineered Materials in Complex Environments

Material System	Test Environment / Matrix	Key Stability Metric	Performance Outcome	Reference / Context
CsPbBr₃ PQD Glass	Ambient air (4 years)	Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY)	Increased from 20% to 93% over 4 years	[88]
Core-Shell PQDs (MAPbBr₃@tetra-OAPbBr₃)	Ambient conditions (900 h)	Power Conversion Efficiency (PCE) Retention	Retained >92% of initial PCE	[6]
Control PSCs (no PQDs)	Ambient conditions (900 h)	Power Conversion Efficiency (PCE) Retention	Retained ~80% of initial PCE	[6]

Validation Data from Complex Biological Matrices

Robust analytical method validation is essential for generating reliable data in preclinical and clinical studies. The following table summarizes validation data for the quantification of 20(S)-Protopanaxadiol (PPD) across multiple biological matrices, demonstrating the applicability of the LC-MS/MS protocol outlined in Section 2.1 [85].

Table 3: Method Validation Summary for PPD Quantification in Various Matrices

Biological Matrix	Validation Scope	Lower Limit of Quantification (LLOQ)	Accuracy Range	Precision (%CV)
Rat Plasma	Full Validation	2.5 ng/mL	Within ± 15%	≤ 15%
Rat Tissue Supernatant	Partial Validation	Data specific to tissue	Within ± 15%	≤ 15%
Rat Bile	Partial Validation	Data specific to bile	Within ± 15%	≤ 15%
Rat Urine	Partial Validation	Data specific to urine	Within ± 15%	≤ 15%
Rat Fecal Supernatant	Partial Validation	Data specific to feces	Within ± 15%	≤ 15%
Dog Plasma	Partial Validation	2.5 ng/mL	Within ± 15%	≤ 15%

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

The following table lists key materials and reagents essential for conducting the experiments described in this application note, along with their critical functions.

Table 4: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Reagent/Material	Function/Application	Example/Note
Internal Standards (IS)	Corrects for variability in sample preparation and MS ionization; essential for quantification.	Isotope-labeled IS (e.g., digoxin-d3); structural analog (e.g., ginsenoside Rh2 for PPD).
LC-MS/MS Grade Solvents	Used in mobile phase and sample preparation to minimize background noise and ion suppression.	Acetonitrile, Methanol, Water.
Protein Precipitation/Extraction Solvents	Precipitates proteins and extracts analytes from complex biological matrices.	Acetonitrile, Methanol, Ether-Dichloromethane mixtures.
Buffer Salts & Additives	Modifies pH and ionic strength to optimize extraction efficiency and chromatographic separation.	Ammonium Formate, Formic Acid, Acetic Acid, Sodium Hydroxide.
Characterized Biological Matrices	Used for preparing calibration standards and QCs; defines the "complex matrix".	Blank (analyte-free) human/rat serum, plasma, tissue homogenates.
Core-Shell Perovskite QDs	The subject nanomaterial for stability testing in serum.	e.g., MAPbBr₃@tetra-OAPbBr₃ PQDs with epitaxial shells for enhanced stability.

The integration of rigorously validated bioanalytical methods, such as the LC-MS/MS protocol detailed herein, with the development of highly stable core-shell PQDs creates a powerful framework for advancing biomedical applications. The data and protocols provided demonstrate that it is feasible to achieve both exceptional material stability in complex environments and precise, accurate quantification of target analytes within challenging biological matrices. This two-pronged approach is indispensable for translating novel PQD-based technologies from the laboratory into viable tools for drug development, clinical diagnostics, and therapeutic monitoring.

Core-shell structures, where a protective shell encapsulates a perovskite quantum dot (PQD) core, represent a transformative strategy for stabilizing these high-performance nanomaterials. These engineered structures are pivotal for enhancing the durability and commercial viability of PQDs in clinical and optoelectronic applications. The core-shell architecture mitigates the intrinsic instability of perovskites—such as their susceptibility to moisture, heat, and oxygen—while preserving their exceptional optoelectronic properties, including high photoluminescence quantum yields (PLQYs) and tunable emission [71] [89]. This Application Note provides a systematic assessment of scalable synthesis methods for core-shell PQDs and delineates the regulatory pathway for their incorporation into clinical devices, thereby offering a practical framework for researchers and product development professionals.

Scalability of Synthesis for Core-Shell PQDs

The transition from laboratory-scale synthesis to industrial production is a critical hurdle for the commercialization of core-shell PQDs. The table below summarizes the key performance metrics and scalability potential of various synthesis methods.

Table 1: Quantitative Comparison of Core-Shell PQD Synthesis Methods

Synthesis Method	Reported PLQY	Stability Enhancement	Scalability Potential	Key Challenges
Sol-Gel Coating (SiO₂)	Up to 97.64% [90]	High; 94% PL retention after 240h in water [90]	High (established industrial processes)	Potential for particle aggregation; control of shell porosity
Ligand-Assisted Reprecipitation	88.24% (CH₃NH₃PbBr₃) [90]	Moderate	Moderate	Requires precise control over ligand concentration and reaction kinetics
Green Hydrothermal Synthesis	~48.4% (CsPbBr₃ deep-blue) [90]	Good thermal stability [91]	Moderate to High	Control over shell uniformity at larger volumes
Solvent-Free Ball Milling	72.15% [90]	Good	High (minimal solvent waste)	Managing heat generation and achieving narrow size distribution

Detailed Experimental Protocols

Protocol: Silica (SiO₂) Shell Encapsulation via Sol-Gel Method

This protocol outlines the formation of a protective silica shell around pre-synthesized CsPbX₃ PQDs, significantly improving their stability for device integration [89] [90].

• Research Reagent Solutions:

  • CsPbX₃ PQD Core Dispersion: A stable colloidal solution of purified PQDs in a non-polar solvent (e.g., toluene, octane).
  • Tetraethyl Orthosilicate (TEOS): Serves as the silica precursor.
  • Ammonium Hydroxide (NH₄OH, 28-30%): Acts as a basic catalyst for the hydrolysis and condensation of TEOS.
  • Surfactant Solution: e.g., CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) to facilitate the interfacial reaction.

• Procedure:

  • Purification: Precipitate and redisperse the CsPbX₃ PQD core solution to remove excess ligands and byproducts. The final concentration should be ~5 mg/mL.
  • Phase Transfer: In a 50 mL flask, combine 10 mL of the purified PQD dispersion with 1 mL of a 10 mM CTAB solution in ethanol. Stir gently at room temperature for 15 minutes.
  • Initiation of Shell Growth: To the stirring mixture, sequentially add 100 µL of TEOS and 200 µL of NH₄OH.
  • Reaction: Allow the reaction to proceed with gentle stirring (200-300 rpm) for 4-6 hours at 30°C. The progression of the silica shell formation can be monitored by a gradual red-shift and broadening of the UV-Vis absorption peak.
  • Purification: Centrifuge the resulting core-shell PQDs at 8000 rpm for 10 minutes. Discard the supernatant and redisperse the pellet in ethanol or isopropanol. Repeat this washing step twice to remove unreacted precursors.
  • Characterization: The successful formation of the core-shell structure should be confirmed using Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and a measured increase in hydrodynamic diameter via Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS). Stability is tested by monitoring PLQY over time in an aqueous environment [90].

Protocol: Green Hydrothermal Synthesis of Core-Shell Nanoparticles

This method utilizes plant-based extracts as reducing and capping agents to synthesize metal core-shell nanoparticles (e.g., Au@Ag), demonstrating a scalable, eco-friendly approach relevant to PQD encapsulation strategies [91].

• Research Reagent Solutions:

  • Thyme Extract: Prepared by boiling 20g of clean thyme leaves in 300 mL deionized water for 45 minutes, followed by cooling and filtration.
  • Gold Precursor: 5 mM Hydrogen Tetrachloroaurate(III) Trihydrate (HAuCl₄).
  • Silver Precursor: 0.1 M Silver Nitrate (AgNO₃).

• Procedure:

  • Seed Synthesis: Mix 20 mL of thyme extract with 20 mL of 5 mM HAuCl₄ solution (1:3 molar ratio of HAuCl₄ to thyme polyphenols). Heat the mixture to 60-80°C with stirring for 1 hour to form gold nanoparticle seeds.
  • Hydrothermal Shell Growth: Combine equal volumes of the synthesized gold seed solution and the 0.1 M AgNO₃ solution. Transfer the mixture to a Teflon-lined autoclave.
  • Reaction: Place the autoclave in an oven and maintain it at the target temperature (e.g., 150°C) for 6 hours.
  • Purification and Collection: After cooling, centrifuge the product at 5000 rpm for 30 minutes. Wash the pellet with deionized water and ethanol, then dry overnight at 50°C to obtain a powdered sample [91].

The workflow for developing and scaling up core-shell PQD synthesis is summarized in the following diagram:

Core-Shell PQD Synthesis Workflow

Regulatory Considerations for Clinical Use

The integration of core-shell PQDs into medical devices necessitates rigorous adherence to regulatory frameworks, primarily governed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The classification of a device, and thus its regulatory path, depends on its intended use and technological characteristics [92].

Table 2: FDA Device Classification and Associated Regulatory Pathways

Device Example Incorporating Core-Shell PQDs	Potential FDA Classification	Regulatory Pathway	Key Requirements
PQD-based Surgical Spray for Tumor Delineation	Class III (Premarket Approval)	PMA (Premarket Approval)	Requires clinical data demonstrating safety and effectiveness; stringent manufacturing quality systems [92].
Implantable PQD Glucose Sensor	Class III (Premarket Approval)	PMA (Premarket Approval)	Extensive biocompatibility testing (ISO 10993), pre-clinical trials, and long-term stability data in biological environment.
Wearable PQD Patch for Sweat Analysis	Class II (Special Controls)	510(k) (if substantially equivalent to a predicate)	Performance standards, post-market surveillance, special labeling; may require clinical data [92].
PQD-enabled Bed Monitor for Vital Signs	Class I (General Controls)	Exempt from 510(k) (subject to limitations)	General controls: establishment registration, device listing, quality system regulation (in part), labeling, prohibitions against adulteration/misbranding [92].

The Regulatory Pathway to Clinical Translation

The journey from concept to a clinically approved device containing core-shell PQDs involves a structured process of evaluation and submission, as illustrated below:

Regulatory Pathway for Clinical Devices

Protocol: Framework for Biocompatibility and Stability Testing

This protocol outlines the essential testing required to support a regulatory submission for a medical device incorporating core-shell PQDs.

• Objective: To generate data on the biological safety and functional stability of the core-shell PQD material as part of the device.

• Materials:

  • Final finished device or representative samples.
  • Extracts of the device prepared using various solvents (polar, non-polar) as per ISO 10993-12.
  • In vitro cell cultures (e.g., murine fibroblasts L929) for cytotoxicity.
  • Environmental chambers for accelerated aging studies.

• Procedure:

  • Cytotoxicity Testing (ISO 10993-5):
    • Prepare extracts of the core-shell PQD material by incubating it in cell culture media and in saline at 37°C for 24 hours.
    • Expose L929 cells to the extracts and assess cell viability using a validated method like the MTT assay after 24-48 hours.
    • Acceptance Criterion: A reduction in cell viability of less than 30% is typically required for a non-cytotoxic classification.
  • Sensitization and Irritation Testing (ISO 10993-10):
    • Conduct a sensitization assay (e.g., Guinea Pig Maximization Test or Local Lymph Node Assay) and a skin irritation study using appropriate animal models or in vitro alternatives.
  • Material Stability under Accelerated Aging (ISO 11607-1):
    • Place the core-shell PQD device in environmental chambers set to elevated temperatures and humidity (e.g., 40°C/75% RH) for pre-determined time points (e.g., 1, 3, 6 months).
    • At each interval, test the device for critical performance attributes, including PLQY, emission wavelength, and material integrity (e.g., via FTIR, XRD). This data is used to project a shelf-life for the product [92] [90].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

The table below lists key materials and their functions for core-shell PQD research and development.

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Core-Shell PQD Fabrication

Reagent / Material	Function in Core-Shell PQD Research	Example / Note
Cesium Lead Halide Precursors	Forms the optoelectronic core of the PQD.	Cs₂CO₃, PbBr₂, PbI₂; purity >99.99% is critical for high PLQY [89].
Tetraethyl Orthosilicate (TEOS)	Precursor for forming an inert, protective silica shell.	Hydrolyzes and condenses to form SiO₂; provides excellent moisture barrier [90].
Oleic Acid & Oleylamine	Surface ligands to control PQD growth and prevent aggregation.	Dynamic binding requires optimization for stability; often used in combination [89].
Plant Extracts (Thyme, Coleus)	Green reducing and capping agents for sustainable synthesis.	Contains polyphenols and flavonoids; used in eco-friendly hydrothermal methods [91].
Manganese Chloride (MnCl₂)	Dopant for lead-free PQDs and for enhancing stability.	Introduces new emission pathways and can improve defect tolerance [90].
Borophosphate Glass Precursors	Encapsulation matrix for extreme environmental protection.	Enables 94% PL retention after 240 hours in water [90].

The successful commercialization of core-shell PQDs, particularly for clinical applications, hinges on a dual-focused strategy: advancing scalable and reproducible synthesis techniques and navigating the complex regulatory landscape with foresight and rigor. Methods such as sol-gel encapsulation and green hydrothermal synthesis show significant promise for scaling, offering pathways to produce PQDs with the requisite stability and performance. Concurrently, a deep understanding of the FDA's classification system and its associated requirements for biocompatibility, manufacturing quality, and clinical evidence is non-negotiable. By integrating materials science with regulatory science from the earliest stages of R&D, researchers can de-risk the development process and accelerate the translation of core-shell PQD technologies from the laboratory to the clinic.

Conclusion

The integration of core-shell structures represents a transformative strategy for unlocking the full potential of Perovskite Quantum Dots in biomedical and clinical research. By combining foundational understanding of PQD degradation with advanced fabrication methods like sol-gel encapsulation and dual-ligand passivation, researchers can effectively overcome critical barriers of instability and toxicity. The successful development of lead-free alternatives and their validation in sensitive biosensing platforms paves the way for future in vivo applications. Key future directions include establishing standardized, scalable synthesis protocols, conducting long-term toxicity studies, and integrating these stabilized PQDs with portable point-of-care devices and multiplexed diagnostic systems, ultimately enabling new frontiers in disease diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring.

References

• 1. Advancing Inorganic Halide Perovskite Quantum Dots [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872204025001884]
• 2. How to improve the structural stabilities of halide perovskite ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10821855/]
• 3. Degradation Mechanisms in Quantum-Dot Light-Emitting ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12608844/]
• 4. Photoluminescence fluctuations in single perovskite ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/zh-tw/content/articlehtml/2025/nr/d5nr01778e]
• 5. CsPbBr 3 /CdS Core/Shell Structure Quantum Dots for ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/chemistry/articles/10.3389/fchem.2019.00499/full]
• 6. In Situ Epitaxial Quantum Dot Passivation Enables Highly ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/15/13/978]
• 7. Synthesis of Magnetic Core–Shell Materials and Their ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12523972/]
• 8. EP3129435A1 - Core - shell composite inorganic... - Google Patents [https://patents.google.com/patent/EP3129435A1/en]
• 9. Gram-scale synthesis of Pt-Co core-shell catalyst and its ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378775323008595]
• 10. Comprehensive structural performance study of multi-core– ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1385894725101046]
• 11. Nanoscale insights in core–shell structure formation and ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1005030224009964]
• 12. Influences of SiO2 Additions on the Structures and Thermal ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/15/10/1204]
• 13. Preparation and thermo-mechanical properties of SiO 2 ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022309325003679]
• 14. Mechanism-Oriented Analysis of Core–Shell Structured ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12113877/]
• 15. One-pot synthesis of Au-M@SiO2 (M = Rh, Pd, Ir, Pt) core– ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-11756-x]
• 16. Synthesis of core–shell SiO 2 /polymer composite ... [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44347-025-00012-w]
• 17. Unveiling superior chemical mechanical polishing ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169433224015587]
• 18. Synthesis and chromatographic evaluating of the core- ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0021967325002122]
• 19. Innovative surfactant-free synthesis of core–shell SiO2/ZnO ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ra/d4ra01309c]
• 20. How to improve the structural stabilities of halide perovskite ... [https://nanoconvergencejournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40580-024-00412-x]
• 21. A bilateral interfacial passivation strategy promoting ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-17633-3]
• 22. Femtosecond laser processing for the perovskite quantum ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352940725003506]
• 23. Ligand Engineering of Inorganic Lead Halide Perovskite ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11280295/]
• 24. Interface–bulk defect engineering via dual ligands for ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1385894725094288?dgcid=rss_sd_all]
• 25. Lead-free perovskite Cs 3 Bi 2 Br 9 quantum dots (QDs ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1385894725004346]
• 26. Lead-free perovskite Cs 3 Bi 2 Br 9 /FeS 2 hollow core-shell Z ... [http://www.ccspublishing.org.cn/article/doi/10.1016/j.cclet.2025.111521]
• 27. Eco-friendly synthesis of Cs 3 Bi 2 Br 9 perovskite quantum ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935125002816]
• 28. Lead-free iron-doped Cs3Bi2Br9 perovskite with tunable ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ra/d4ra04062g]
• 29. Gel growth and characterization of Cs3Bi2Br9 perovskite ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physics/articles/10.3389/fphy.2023.1129301/full]
• 30. Silane-Coupled Silica Nanoparticles Encapsulating Emitting ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12388236/]
• 31. One-step formation of core/shell structure based on ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925838821027560]
• 32. Accelerated sol–gel synthesis of nanoporous silica via ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/dd/d5dd00274e]
• 33. Sol–gel synthesis and characterization of ZnO–SiO2 ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/na/d5na00612k]
• 34. Green Synthesis Innovations and Robust Stabilization of Perovskite Quantum Dots for Sustainable High-Efficiency LED Technologies | Journal of Electronic Materials [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11664-025-12477-3]
• 35. Approaching high-performance light-emitting devices upon ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1748013222000767]
• 36. Ligand-assisted reprecipitation synthesis of highly luminescent and stable CsPbBr3@SiO2nanoparticles with formation kinetics analysis - PubMed [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39094606/]
• 37. Perovskite Quantum Dots Synthesis [https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/US/en/technical-documents/technical-article/materials-science-and-engineering/nanoparticle-and-microparticle-synthesis/synthesis-halide-perovskite-quantum-dots-display-applications]
• 38. Facile Synthesis of Colloidal Lead Halide Perovskite Nanoplatelets via Ligand-Assisted Reprecipitation [https://www.jove.com/t/60114/facile-synthesis-colloidal-lead-halide-perovskite-nanoplatelets-via]
• 39. Recent progresses on perovskite quantum dots patterning ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949829524000068]
• 40. Advancements in Targeted Quantum Dots Structures for ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12655112/]
• 41. Suppressing non-radiative recombination for efficient and ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/ee/d4ee02917h]
• 42. Synergistic defect passivation in lead-free perovskite ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1010603025006598]
• 43. In Situ Epitaxial Quantum Dot Passivation Enables Highly ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12250851/]
• 44. Quantum Dot Based Nano-Biosensors for Detection of ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6291444/]
• 45. Quantum dot-infused nanocomposites: revolutionizing diagnostic... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/nr/d5nr00440c]
• 46. endogenous adenosine triphosphate-responded... Femtomolar [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37858568/]
• 47. Precision Pathogen : Argonaute Powers a New Era of... Detection [https://globalbiodefense.com/2025/06/05/precision-pathogen-detection-argonaute-powers-a-new-era-of-biosensing/]
• 48. Next-generation nanomaterials-based biosensors: Real- ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589234724004044]
• 49. Lateral Flow Assays Market to Grow at a CAGR of 7.5% ... [https://finance.yahoo.com/news/lateral-flow-assays-market-grow-030000502.html]
• 50. Lateral Flow Assays Market Thrives with Smart Tech Growth [https://www.towardshealthcare.com/insights/lateral-flow-assays-market-sizing]
• 51. Fundamental principles of photoelectrochemical sensors with ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/ra/d5ra06395g]
• 52. 2024 LFA Year in Review and 2025 Predictions [https://dcndx.com/insights/2024-lfa-review-2025-predictions-lateral-flow/]
• 53. A comprehensive review of competitive lateral flow assays ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/lc/d4lc01075b]
• 54. Advances in photoelectrochemical glucose sensors [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949829525001196]
• 55. Integration of the photoelectrochemical sensor in an ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0026265X25030267]
• 56. An integrated wearable photo-electrochemical sensor for ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40829481/]
• 57. Core–Shell Particles: From Fabrication Methods to Diverse ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10054063/]
• 58. International Lead Poisoning Prevention Week 2025 [https://www.who.int/campaigns/international-lead-poisoning-prevention-week/2025]
• 59. based perovskite solar cells through material and structural ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-95473-1]
• 60. Development of lead-free perovskite solar cells [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123023005650]
• 61. Analysis and optimization of lead-free perovskite solar cells [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40243-024-00260-z]
• 62. Core–shell nanoparticles used in drug delivery-microfluidics [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9053716/]
• 63. Sensitive metal-enhanced photoluminescence and Raman ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0030399224015196]
• 64. Ultrasensitive dopamine detection using CsPbBr3-PQD-COF ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12136283/]
• 65. Surface chemistry stabilized photolithography for high- ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1369702125003566]
• 66. Direct in situ photolithography of perovskite quantum dots ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-34453-9]
• 67. High-resolution and high-efficiency micro quantum-dot light ... [https://www.sciopen.com/article/10.26599/NR.2025.94907407?issn=1998-0124]
• 68. Surface Quality and Material Removal Rate in Fabricating ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10303960/]
• 69. A comprehensive experimental study regarding size ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0735193321006576]
• 70. A practical guide to measuring and reporting photophysical data [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/dt/d5dt02095f]
• 71. Recent progress in core–shell structural materials towards ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1385894724031681]
• 72. Fabrication and Characterization of the Core-Shell ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7864743/]
• 73. Fabrication and testing of a multifunctional SiO2@ZnO core ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-39423-9]
• 74. Establishment of absolute photoluminescence (PL) ... [https://www.hamamatsu.com/jp/en/applications/evaluation-of-luminescent-materials/case-study/establishment-of-absolute-photoluminescence-quantum-yield-measurement-method-and-research-on-organic-optoelectronics.html]
• 75. Determination of Quantum Yield in Scattering Media Using ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/18/15/3710]
• 76. Comparative Analysis of Quantum Dot Synthesis: Methods, ... [https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202506.0248]
• 77. Fluorescent CdTe/ZnS Core/Shell Quantum Dots for ... [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10895-025-04138-9]
• 78. Producing Carbon Quantum Dots from Drug Molecules [https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/18/6/767]
• 79. Recent advancements in application of carbohydrate-derived ... [https://bioresourcesbioprocessing.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40643-025-00953-x]
• 80. Systematic review of carbon quantum dots (CQD) [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364032125005271]
• 81. Recent advancements in the study of stability and ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022459624004341]
• 82. A comprehensive review of core/shell nanostructures ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ta/d5ta03459k]
• 83. Next-Generation Biosensing with Perovskite Quantum Dots [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872204025001860]
• 84. Enhanced performance of lead sulfide quantum dot ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10520828/]
• 85. LC–MS/MS quantification of 20(S)-protopanaxadiol in ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-01432-1]
• 86. Development and validation of an analytical method using ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570023222004573]
• 87. Validation of Analytical Methods for Biomarkers Employed ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2744124/]
• 88. Four years of air exposure: Passive surface chemical ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1385894725053513]
• 89. Review Perovskite nanocrystals: Synthesis, stability, and ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925838825018602]
• 90. Abdellattif 等 - 2025 - Green Synthesis Innovations and ... [https://www.scribd.com/document/947341728/Abdellattif-%E7%AD%89-2025-Green-Synthesis-Innovations-and-Robust-Stabilization-of-Perovskite-Quantum-Dots-for-Sustainable-High-Efficiency-LED-Technologie]
• 91. Green hydrothermal synthesis and optimization of gold/ ... [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43994-025-00268-9]
• 92. 21 CFR Part 880 -- General Hospital and Personal Use ... [https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-H/part-880]