Temperature Effects on SPR Baseline Stability: A Comprehensive Guide for Reliable Biosensing

Abstract

Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) biosensing is a cornerstone of label-free, real-time interaction analysis in drug discovery and biomedical research. However, temperature fluctuations are a critical, often overlooked variable that can significantly compromise baseline stability, data quality, and the accuracy of derived kinetic parameters. This article provides a comprehensive analysis for researchers and development professionals, covering the fundamental thermo-optic principles governing SPR, methodological strategies for temperature control and exploitation, practical troubleshooting for baseline drift, and advanced validation techniques. By synthesizing foundational knowledge with application-focused and troubleshooting guidance, this resource aims to empower scientists to achieve robust, temperature-resilient SPR assays, thereby enhancing the reliability of data in critical applications from lead optimization to biotherapeutic characterization.

The Thermo-Optic Foundation: How Temperature Dictates SPR Sensor Performance

This technical guide examines the fundamental interrelationships between temperature, refractive index (RI), and surface plasmon resonance (SPR), a critical consideration for ensuring baseline stability in SPR research. SPR biosensors have become indispensable in pharmaceutical development and biological research for real-time, label-free biomolecular interaction analysis. However, temperature fluctuations introduce significant measurement variances by altering the refractive index at the sensor interface, potentially compromising data accuracy and reliability. This whitepaper delineates the core principles governing these relationships, presents validated experimental methodologies for their investigation, and provides practical strategies for temperature compensation to enhance SPR assay robustness and data quality for research scientists and drug development professionals.

Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) and Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance (LSPR) are powerful optical sensing techniques that enable real-time, label-free monitoring of molecular interactions. SPR involves the collective oscillation of free electrons at the interface between a metal (typically gold) and a dielectric medium, excited by incident light at a specific angle or wavelength [1]. LSPR describes non-propagating plasmons confined to metallic nanoparticles, sensitive to changes in the local nanoenvironment [1]. The resonance condition is highly sensitive to changes in the refractive index (RI) adjacent to the metal surface, with shifts of approximately 10-100 nm per refractive index unit (RIU) for LSPR sensors and even greater for SPR sensors [1].

The foundational equation for SPR resonance condition is given by:

[ kx = \frac{2π}{λ} np \sin(θ) = \frac{2π}{λ} \sqrt{\frac{εm εa}{εm + εa}} ]

Where (kx) is the wavevector component of the incident light along the interface, (λ) is the wavelength, (np) is the prism refractive index, (θ) is the angle of incidence, and (εm) and (εa) are the dielectric constants of the metal and analyte, respectively [2]. This principle forms the basis for detecting molecular binding events, as the accumulation of biomolecules on the sensor surface alters the local RI, producing a measurable shift in the resonance condition [1] [3].

Fundamental Interrelationships

The Temperature-Refractive Index Relationship

Temperature directly influences the refractive index of dielectric materials, including analytes and sensing layers, through the thermodynamic effect of thermal expansion. As temperature increases, molecular distances expand, reducing material density and consequently lowering the refractive index [4]. This relationship is particularly pronounced in liquid samples and polymer sensing layers, where the thermo-optic coefficient ((dn/dT)) can be significant. For aqueous solutions, the refractive index temperature dependence is approximately -1×10⁻⁴ RIU/°C near room temperature, necessizing strict thermal control for precise SPR measurements [4].

The temperature-induced RI change represents a primary confounding factor in SPR measurements, as it directly shifts the baseline resonance condition without corresponding to any binding event of interest. This effect is quantified by the temperature sensitivity of SPR sensors, typically ranging from 0.1 to 1.0 nm/°C depending on the sensor configuration and materials [4] [5].

The Refractive Index-Plasmon Resonance Relationship

The resonance condition in SPR is exquisitely sensitive to changes in the refractive index at the metal-dielectric interface. When biomolecules bind to the functionalized sensor surface, they displace the aqueous medium with their higher refractive index, producing a measurable shift in resonance angle or wavelength [1]. This relationship enables quantitative measurement of binding kinetics and affinity.

The sensitivity of an SPR sensor to refractive index changes is defined as:

[ S_{RI} = \frac{\Delta \lambda}{\Delta n} \quad \text{(nm/RIU)} ]

where (\Delta \lambda) is the resonance wavelength shift and (\Delta n) is the refractive index change. High-performance SPR sensors demonstrate sensitivities ranging from 10³ to 10⁴ nm/RIU [6] [5]. For example, a D-shaped photonic crystal fiber SPR sensor achieved sensitivity of 6.1 nm/°C for temperature sensing [5], while a graphene-LiNbO₃ based plasmonic perfect absorber showed RI sensitivity of 981 nm/RIU [6].

The Direct Temperature-Plasmon Resonance Coupling

Beyond the indirect effect through analyte RI changes, temperature directly influences SPR through multiple mechanisms:

• Thermal expansion of metallic layers alters film thickness and morphology
• Temperature-dependent dielectric function of the metal (typically gold) modifies the plasmon dispersion relation
• Thermo-optic effects in prism and substrate materials change the optical coupling efficiency

These direct effects necessitate comprehensive temperature characterization of the entire SPR instrument, not just the fluidic system [4]. Advanced sensor designs incorporating dual-parameter measurement capability can discriminate between RI changes due to binding events and those caused by temperature fluctuations [4] [6].

Diagram 1: Temperature effects on SPR signal pathway. Temperature influences SPR signals through multiple direct and indirect pathways, potentially leading to baseline instability without proper compensation.

Experimental Methodologies for Investigating Temperature Effects

Dual-Parameter Interrogation Technique

A sophisticated approach for decoupling temperature and RI effects employs simultaneous measurement using two interrogation modes [4]. This method utilizes the differential response of resonance parameters to temperature and RI changes:

Angular Interrogation Mode:

• Measure resonance angle shifts at two different wavelengths
• Resonance angle demonstrates distinct sensitivity coefficients to RI ((S{RI}^θ)) and temperature ((ST^θ)) at each wavelength

Wavelength Interrogation Mode:

• Measure resonance wavelength shifts at two different incidence angles
• Resonance wavelength shows characteristic sensitivity coefficients to RI ((S{RI}^λ)) and temperature ((ST^λ)) at each angle

The sensitivity matrix formulation enables simultaneous determination of both parameters:

[ \begin{bmatrix} \Delta θ \ \Delta λ

\end{bmatrix}

\begin{bmatrix} S{RI}^θ & ST^θ \ S{RI}^λ & ST^λ \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} \Delta n \ \Delta T \end{bmatrix} ]

By inverting this matrix, both refractive index change ((\Delta n)) and temperature variation ((\Delta T)) can be extracted from the measured resonance shifts ((\Delta θ), (\Delta λ)) [4]. This approach effectively compensates for thermal fluctuations, significantly improving measurement accuracy for molecular binding studies.

Temperature-Controlled Kinetic Assay Protocol

The critical influence of temperature on biomolecular interaction kinetics necessitates carefully controlled experimental protocols. The following methodology has been validated for accurate kinetic parameter determination:

Apparatus Setup:

• SPR instrument with precise temperature control (±0.1°C)
• Fluidic system with thermoelectric cooling/heating
• Temperature sensors at critical points (inlet, flow cell, outlet)

Procedure:

• System Stabilization: Equilibrate entire SPR system at target temperature for minimum 2 hours before measurements
• Buffer Matching: Pre-equilibrate all running buffers at identical temperature
• Ligand Immobilization: Immobilize capture ligand using standard amine, thiol, or streptavidin-biotin chemistry
• Analyte Preparation: Dilute analyte in temperature-equilibrated running buffer
• Data Collection: Perform binding experiments with multi-cycle kinetics
• Regeneration: Apply regeneration solution between cycles while maintaining temperature
• Reference Subtraction: Use reference flow cell with immobilized non-specific ligand for background subtraction

Critical Considerations:

• Lower temperatures (e.g., 10°C) can enhance kinetic dissimilarities between variants and improve fit to Langmuir 1:1 model [7]
• Monitor baseline stability for minimum 5 minutes before analyte injection to verify thermal equilibrium
• Include buffer blanks to control for refractive index changes from temperature drift

This protocol was successfully applied to characterize SARS-CoV-2 RBD variants binding to ACE2, revealing subtle kinetic differences obscured at higher temperatures [7].

Diagram 2: Temperature-controlled SPR workflow. The experimental sequence for conducting temperature-stabilized SPR measurements, highlighting critical steps for minimizing thermal artifacts.

Advanced Sensor Design for Temperature Compensation

Novel sensor architectures incorporating specialized materials enable inherent temperature compensation:

Graphene-LiNbO₃ Plasmonic Perfect Absorber:

• Structure: Quartz glass substrate with 20nm SiO₂ layer, 0.34nm graphene layer, four gold nanorods (50nm radius, 60nm height) with central nanocavity [6]
• Operating Principle: Graphene enhances RI sensitivity while LiNbO₃ substrate provides thermal stability
• Performance: RI sensitivity of 981 nm/RIU with figure-of-merit 61.31 RIU⁻¹; temperature sensitivity of -0.23 nm/°C with PDMS functional layer [6]

D-Shaped Photonic Crystal Fiber Sensor:

• Structure: D-shaped fiber with silver film coating and ethanol-chloroform mixture as temperature-sensitive material [5]
• Operating Principle: Surface plasmons excited at metal-dielectric interface with temperature-dependent spectral response
• Performance: Maximum temperature sensitivity of 6.1 nm/°C with resolution of 1.63×10⁻³ °C over 0-60°C range [5]

These specialized sensors demonstrate the potential for intrinsic temperature compensation through careful material selection and structural design.

Quantitative Data and Performance Metrics

Table 1: Temperature and Refractive Index Sensitivity of Various SPR Sensor Configurations

Sensor Type	RI Sensitivity (nm/RIU)	Temperature Sensitivity (nm/°C)	Measurement Range	Reference
Prism-based SPR (theoretical)	3×10³ - 1×10⁴ (angular)	0.1 - 1.0	RI: 1.33-1.40; Temp: 0-60°C	[4]
Graphene-LiNbO₃ Perfect Absorber	981	-0.23 (with PDMS)	RI: 1.33-1.40 (biomedical)	[6]
D-shaped Photonic Crystal Fiber	N/R	6.1	Temp: 0-60°C	[5]
Ag Nanoparticles (LSPR)	1144	N/R	RI: Glucose solutions	[6]

Table 2: Impact of Temperature on SARS-CoV-2 RBD-ACE2 Binding Kinetics

RBD Variant	Temperature	kₐ (×10⁵ M⁻¹s⁻¹)	k_d (×10⁻³ s⁻¹)	K_D (nM)	Data Quality (χ²)	Reference
Wild Type	10°C	1.39 ± 0.05	2.6 ± 0.1	18.7 ± 0.9	0.01 (Excellent)	[7]
Wild Type	25°C	2.85 ± 0.13	9.5 ± 0.4	33.3 ± 1.8	0.07 (Good)	[7]
Wild Type	37°C	4.12 ± 0.25	24.8 ± 1.2	60.2 ± 4.1	0.35 (Moderate)	[7]
Omicron	10°C	1.67 ± 0.06	1.9 ± 0.1	11.4 ± 0.6	0.01 (Excellent)	[7]
Omicron	25°C	3.24 ± 0.14	6.2 ± 0.3	19.1 ± 1.1	0.06 (Good)	[7]

N/R: Not Reported in the cited study

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Temperature-Stable SPR Research

Reagent/Material	Function	Application Notes	Reference
E5/K5 Coiled-Coil Peptides	Oriented ligand capture	Enables stable, oriented protein immobilization; reduces artifacts vs. traditional capture methods	[7]
Gold Nanorods (50-60nm)	Plasmonic nanostructures	Engineered LSPR substrates with tunable resonance; higher sensitivity than spherical nanoparticles	[6]
Graphene Layers (0.34nm)	2D sensing material	Enhances RI sensitivity; facilitates biomolecular adsorption; improves electrical/thermal conductivity	[6]
LiNbO₃ Substrate	Thermally stable foundation	Excellent piezoelectric/electro-optic properties; minimal thermal expansion; ideal for temperature sensing	[6]
PDMS (Polydimethylsiloxane)	Functional polymer layer	Temperature-sensitive material; flexible substrate for microfluidics integration	[6]
Ethanol-Chloroform Mixture	Temperature-sensitive medium	High thermo-optic coefficient enables sensitive temperature detection in fiber-optic SPR	[5]
Glycoengineered ACE2 Variants	Glycovariant analysis	Enables study of glycosylation impact on binding kinetics; produced in modified CHO cell lines	[7]

The intricate relationship between temperature, refractive index, and plasmon resonance represents both a challenge and opportunity in SPR biosensing. Temperature-induced baseline drift can significantly compromise data quality, particularly in long-term experiments and drug discovery applications requiring precise kinetic parameter determination. However, through advanced sensor designs incorporating dual-parameter measurement capabilities, carefully controlled experimental protocols with enhanced thermal management, and specialized materials with compensatory thermal properties, researchers can effectively mitigate these effects. The methodologies and compensation strategies outlined in this technical guide provide a foundation for enhancing SPR data reliability, ultimately supporting more accurate biomolecular interaction analysis in pharmaceutical development and basic research. Future directions will likely focus on real-time adaptive temperature compensation algorithms and nanomaterial-enhanced sensor architectures with intrinsically reduced thermal sensitivity.

Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) is a cornerstone label-free technology for real-time biomolecular interaction analysis, playing a critical role in drug discovery, diagnostics, and basic research [8] [9]. A persistent challenge in obtaining quantitative, high-fidelity data from SPR biosensors is baseline stability, which can be significantly compromised by temperature fluctuations [10]. The fundamental principle of SPR—tracking minute changes in the refractive index at a sensor surface—makes it inherently sensitive to the thermo-optic effect, the change in a material's refractive index with temperature [11]. This dependency is quantified by the thermo-optic coefficient.

This guide provides a detailed technical examination of the thermo-optic coefficients of materials central to SPR biosensing. Framed within a broader thesis on temperature effects on SPR baseline stability, we will quantify the TOCs of prism couplers, metal films, and buffer solutions, summarize this data for easy comparison, and outline experimental methodologies for their characterization. A thorough understanding of these parameters is not merely academic; it is essential for designing stable SPR instruments, developing robust experimental protocols, and accurately interpreting binding data for critical applications such as the characterization of therapeutic candidates targeting G protein-coupled receptors [9].

Theoretical Foundations of the Thermo-Optic Effect in SPR

The Physical Basis of the Thermo-Optic Coefficient

The thermo-optic effect describes the variation of a material's refractive index ((n)) with temperature ((T)). This relationship is defined by the thermo-optic coefficient (TOC or (dn/dT)), with units of K⁻¹ [12]. The value and sign of the TOC are determined by the underlying physical changes a material undergoes upon heating, primarily thermal expansion and changes in electronic polarizability [13].

Heating a material typically causes thermal expansion, increasing the volume and reducing the number density of oscillators (atoms or molecules). This generally leads to a decrease in refractive index, resulting in a negative TOC [12] [13]. Concurrently, rising temperature affects the electronic polarizability of the constituent atoms and molecules, which tends to increase the refractive index—a positive contribution to the TOC. The net TOC is the sum of these competing effects. In most optical polymers, the density change dominates, yielding a large negative TOC. In materials like silicon, the polarizability change is more significant, leading to a positive and substantial TOC of approximately (1.86 \times 10^{-4} \, K^{-1}) [11] [14].

Temperature Coupling into SPR Response

In an SPR biosensor, the resonance condition is highly sensitive to the refractive index of the dielectric medium (e.g., the buffer) immediately adjacent to the metal film. The resonance angle or wavelength ((\lambda_{SPR})) shifts according to changes in this dielectric constant [2]. Temperature influences the SPR signal through several coupled mechanisms, primarily via the TOCs of the constituent materials. The following diagram illustrates the logical pathway through which a temperature fluctuation propagates to create an SPR baseline shift.

As shown, a temperature change directly alters the refractive indices of the prism, metal film, and buffer via their respective TOCs. These individual changes collectively modify the effective refractive index of the entire system, leading to a shift in the SPR resonance condition that is observed as baseline drift [10]. This drift can be mistakenly interpreted as a mass change or binding event, compromising data integrity.

Thermo-Optic Coefficients of Common SPR Materials

The accurate prediction and correction of temperature-induced drift require precise TOC values for all materials in the optical stack.

Prism Materials

The prism couples light into the surface plasmon. Its high refractive index and TOC are significant contributors to the overall system's temperature sensitivity.

Table 1: Thermo-Optic Coefficients of Common SPR Prism Materials

Material	Refractive Index (n) @ 633 nm	Thermo-Optic Coefficient (dn/dT) ×10⁻⁵ (K⁻¹)	Notes
SF10 Glass	~1.728	~+2.0 to +3.0 (est.)	Common high-index glass; positive, moderate TOC.
BK7 Glass	~1.515	~+1.0 to +2.0 (est.)	Standard optical glass; low, positive TOC.
Silicon (Si)	~3.88 @ 1550 nm	+18.6 [11] [14]	High positive TOC dominates Si photonic device tuning.
SiO₂ (Fused Silica)	~1.457	+0.97 to +1.25 [13]	Very low TOC, excellent for thermal stability.

Metal Films and Adhesion Layers

The thin metal film (typically gold) is the active plasmonic layer. Its TOC, while complex due to its complex dielectric constant, is a fixed material property. A thin chromium or titanium adhesion layer is often used between the glass and gold.

Table 2: Thermo-Optic Coefficients of SPR Metal Films

Material	Function	Thermo-Optic Coefficient (dn/dT) ×10⁻⁵ (K⁻¹)	Notes
Gold (Au)	Plasmonic Layer	~+13.0 to +15.0 (est.)	Complex dielectric function; TOC derived from reported ε(T) variations.
Chromium (Cr)	Adhesion Layer	Not Well Characterized	Its primary impact is on SPR curve quality and adhesion, not direct TOC.

Buffer Solutions and Polymers

The dielectric medium has the most variable and often the largest TOC in the system. Aqueous buffers are highly sensitive to temperature.

Table 3: Thermo-Optic Coefficients of Dielectric Media

Material	Thermo-Optic Coefficient (dn/dT) ×10⁻⁵ (K⁻¹)	Notes
Water / Aqueous Buffer	≈ -8.0 [10]	Large, negative TOC is a primary source of drift. Must be controlled.
Polystyrene (PS)	≈ -10.0 to -14.0 [13]	Common polymer for substrates; high negative TOC.
PMMA	≈ -12.0 to -13.5 [13]	Common optical polymer; high negative TOC.

Experimental Protocols for Characterizing Thermo-Optic Effects

Methodology for Determining Material TOC

Determining the TOC of a solid material, such as a prism or polymer film, typically involves measuring its refractive index at different temperatures using a Metricon Prism Coupler or similar instrument. The general workflow for this characterization is outlined below.

Detailed Protocol:

• Sample Preparation: For a polymer, spin-coat a thin, uniform film onto a clean substrate. For a prism, ensure the coupling surface is clean and polished [13].
• Temperature Control: Place the sample on a Peltier-controlled stage with a calibrated temperature sensor. Allow the system to stabilize for at least 15-30 minutes at each target temperature (e.g., 20, 25, 30, 35°C) to ensure thermal equilibrium [10].
• Refractive Index Measurement: Using the prism coupler, measure the critical angle for the sample at each stabilized temperature. The instrument software directly calculates the refractive index ((n)) at the laser wavelength (e.g., 633 nm).
• Data Analysis: Plot the measured refractive index values against temperature. Perform a linear regression analysis on the data points. The slope of the best-fit line is the thermo-optic coefficient, (dn/dT), for the material.

Protocol for Characterizing System-Level SPR Temperature Sensitivity

To evaluate the combined effect of all material TOCs on a specific SPR instrument, a system-level characterization is necessary.

Procedure:

• System Setup: Use a standard, non-derivatized sensor chip (e.g., a bare gold chip). Equilibrate the SPR instrument and its fluidics with a degassed running buffer (e.g., HEPES Buffered Saline) [10].
• Temperature Programming: Set the instrument's internal thermostat to a series of temperatures (e.g., 15, 20, 25°C). At each temperature, allow for extended stabilization (e.g., 1-2 hours) to minimize drift.
• Data Collection: Once the baseline is stable at each temperature, record the resonance signal (in Response Units, RU) over a 5-10 minute period. Calculate the average baseline value at each temperature.
• Analysis: Plot the average baseline RU against temperature. The slope of this plot gives the system's temperature sensitivity in RU/°C. This value encapsulates the combined thermo-optic effects of the prism, sensor chip, and buffer, providing a critical parameter for baseline drift correction.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 4: Essential Materials for SPR Thermo-Optic Research

Item	Function in Research	Relevance to Thermo-Optic Studies
High-Index Prisms (SF10, LaSFN9)	Couples light to excite surface plasmons.	Their significant positive TOC is a key variable in system thermal sensitivity [2].
Bare Gold Sensor Chips	Provides the plasmon-active surface.	The baseline for characterizing system drift; the TOC of gold influences the resonance condition.
Cryptophane-A Doped Polymers	A specialized sensing layer for methane detection.	Demonstrates how a polymer matrix with a high negative TOC can be engineered for specific analyte sensing [15].
Peltier Temperature Stage	Provides precise and stable temperature control for the sensor surface.	Critical for both characterizing TOCs and for active temperature stabilization during experiments [10].
Refractive Index Matching Fluid	Eliminates air gaps between prism and sensor slide in home-built systems.	Its TOC must be considered in detailed system modeling to avoid unaccounted thermal shifts [2].
Degassed Running Buffer	Standard solution for maintaining biomolecule stability during flow.	Its large, negative TOC is the most common source of significant baseline drift and must be temperature-controlled [10].

The stability of the SPR baseline is inextricably linked to the thermo-optic coefficients of the system's constituent materials. As quantified in this guide, these coefficients vary significantly—from the highly positive (dn/dT) of silicon to the strongly negative (dn/dT) of aqueous buffers and optical polymers. This variation means that temperature fluctuations induce a complex, material-dependent shift in the SPR condition that manifests as baseline drift. A profound understanding of these values is indispensable. It informs the selection of instrument materials for enhanced thermal stability, enables the development of advanced correction algorithms based on comprehensive system modeling as demonstrated in recent SPR spectrometer research [2], and is fundamental to designing rigorous experimental protocols that minimize thermal noise. For researchers pursuing high-precision applications, particularly in drug discovery where kinetic parameter accuracy is paramount, proactively managing the impact of thermo-optic coefficients is not an optional refinement but a necessary discipline for generating reliable and reproducible data.

Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) biosensing stands as a cornerstone technology in modern biochemical analysis, drug discovery, and molecular interaction studies. Its capacity for label-free, real-time monitoring of binding events provides researchers with critical insights into kinetic parameters and affinity constants. However, the exquisite sensitivity of SPR to minute changes in the refractive index at the sensor surface renders it susceptible to environmental perturbations, with temperature variation representing a primary confounding factor. Within the broader context of SPR baseline stability research, understanding the direct physical manifestations of temperature shifts is paramount for experimental reliability and data integrity. This technical guide examines the fundamental mechanisms through which temperature fluctuations induce two critical phenomena: baseline drift and resonance angle broadening, providing researchers with a comprehensive framework for identification, quantification, and mitigation.

Fundamental Temperature Dependencies in SPR Systems

The core operating principle of SPR relies on monitoring changes in the refractive index (RI) at the interface between a metal sensor surface and a liquid medium. Temperature directly affects this fundamental parameter through the thermo-optic effect, causing the RI of both the sensor chip materials and the liquid buffer to change with temperature. Even minor temperature variations can induce significant baseline drift, as the system interprets these RI changes as apparent binding signals [16].

Furthermore, the plasmon resonance phenomenon itself exhibits intrinsic temperature sensitivity. Research on multilayer SPR structures has demonstrated that the plasmon resonance angle shifts linearly with temperature, with reported temperature coefficient sensitivities reaching values as high as -1020.41 ppm/°C [16]. This fundamental relationship means that without precise temperature control, the foundational reference point of SPR measurements becomes unstable, compromising all subsequent kinetic analysis.

The temperature dependence extends to the biomolecules under investigation as well. Binding affinity and kinetic rates typically follow Arrhenius behavior, where complex formation and dissociation rates change exponentially with temperature [17]. This relationship, while useful for thermodynamic analysis through Van't Hoff and Eyring equations, introduces additional variability when temperature is not strictly controlled throughout experimental runs.

Quantitative Manifestations of Temperature Effects

Baseline Drift Mechanisms and Magnitudes

Baseline drift in SPR manifests as a gradual increase or decrease in the response signal when no active binding occurs, directly complicating the interpretation of binding signals and quantification of kinetic parameters. Temperature-induced drift primarily occurs through several physical mechanisms:

Thermal Expansion and Material Properties: Temperature changes cause physical expansion or contraction of the SPR instrument components, including the microfluidic system and optical components. This alters the precise alignment required for accurate SPR measurement, inducing apparent baseline shifts [18] [16].

Buffer Refractive Index Changes: The refractive index of aqueous buffers typically decreases by approximately 1×10^-4 to 3×10^-4 RIU/°C, depending on buffer composition and ionic strength. For an SPR system with sensitivity of 10^4 RIU/RU, this translates to a drift of 1-3 RU/°C, which can significantly impact measurements of small molecules or weak interactions [16].

System Equilibration Issues: After temperature changes, SPR systems require substantial time to reach thermal equilibrium. During this period, continuous baseline drift occurs as components and solutions stabilize. Research indicates that equilibration may require 5-30 minutes after flow initiation or temperature adjustment, depending on sensor type and immobilized ligand [18].

Table 1: Characteristic Baseline Drift Rates Under Various Temperature Conditions

Temperature Change	Sensor Type	Observed Drift Rate	Equilibration Time	Primary Contributing Factor
±0.5°C	Standard CM5	2-5 RU/min	5-15 min	Buffer RI change
±1.0°C	Bare gold chip	5-10 RU/min	10-20 min	Combined thermal effects
±2.0°C	Nanostructured	10-20 RU/min	15-30 min	Material expansion
Buffer change +1°C	All types	5-15 RU/min	10-25 min	Buffer mixing & temperature

Resonance Angle Broadening and Shift

Resonance angle broadening represents a more subtle but equally critical manifestation of temperature instability in SPR systems. As temperature increases, several phenomena contribute to this effect:

Angular Sensitivity and Resonance Broadening: Studies have demonstrated that resonance peaks broaden measurably as sensor temperature increases. This broadening effect reduces the detection accuracy of the SPR system, as the determination of the exact resonance angle becomes less precise [16]. The broadening is attributed to increased thermal vibrations in the metallic layers and enhanced scattering losses at higher temperatures.

Multilayer Response to Temperature: In advanced SPR configurations employing multiple layers (e.g., BK7/TiO₂/SiO₂/Ag/Au/2D-material structures), each layer possesses distinct thermo-optic coefficients. The temperature-dependent RI changes in these layers do not occur uniformly, creating complex interactions that distort the resonance curve. Research shows that angular sensitivity can improve from 144 deg/RIU in conventional designs to 345.42 deg/RIU in optimized multilayer structures, but this enhanced sensitivity comes with increased vulnerability to temperature fluctuations [16].

Temperature-Dependent Material Properties: The complex permittivity of gold and silver films, critical for SPR excitation, exhibits temperature dependence. The real and imaginary parts of the dielectric constant both change with temperature, affecting both the resonance position and the width of the dip in the SPR curve [16].

Table 2: Temperature Effects on Resonance Parameters in Different SPR Configurations

SPR Configuration	Temperature Range	Resonance Shift	Broadening Coefficient	Angular Sensitivity
Conventional (BK7/Ag)	20-30°C	0.08-0.12°/°C	Low	144 deg/RIU
BK7/Ag/Au	20-30°C	0.10-0.15°/°C	Medium	158 deg/RIU
BK7/TiO₂/SiO₂/Ag/Au/BlueP-MoS₂	0-27°C	0.18-0.25°/°C	High	345.42 deg/RIU
Fiber-based SPR	15-35°C	0.5-1.2 nm/°C	Medium	2000-3500 nm/RIU

Experimental Protocols for Temperature Effect Characterization

Multi-Temperature Kinetic Experiments

The following protocol, adapted from recent research, enables systematic characterization of temperature effects on binding interactions:

Surface Preparation:

• Immobilize the ligand of interest using standard amine coupling on a CM5 sensor chip
• Activate carboxyl groups with 1:1 mixture of 0.4 M EDC and 0.1 M NHS for 7 minutes
• Inject ligand solution (0.1 g/L in 10 mM acetate buffer, pH 5.0) in 30-second pulses until desired immobilization level is reached (typically 4500-5000 RU for proteins)
• Block remaining active esters with 1 M ethanolamine (pH 8.5) for 4 minutes
• Prepare a reference surface simultaneously using identical activation/deactivation without ligand injection [17]

Temperature-Controlled Binding Experiments:

• Prepare analyte samples at multiple concentrations (typically 7 concentrations with two-fold dilutions)
• Set instrument to conduct duplicate injections at each temperature (e.g., 12°C, 16°C, 20°C, 24°C)
• Use extended dissociation times (270-570 seconds) to ensure complete dissociation without regeneration
• Include buffer injections for double-referencing (4 injections per temperature condition)
• Maintain constant flow rate (e.g., 85 μL/min) across all temperatures [17]

Data Analysis:

• Perform double-referencing by subtracting both reference surface and buffer injections
• Fit kinetic data globally to appropriate binding models at each temperature
• Extract association (kₐ) and dissociation (kḍ) rates across temperature range
• Apply Van't Hoff and Eyring equations to determine thermodynamic parameters (ΔH, ΔS, ΔG) [17]

Temperature-Scan (T-Scan) Melting Curves

For DNA hybridization studies and protein stability assessment, temperature-scan experiments provide valuable thermodynamic information:

SPR Imaging with Temperature Control:

• Fabricate DNA chips with multiple probe spots (200 μm diameter) via electropolymerization
• Incorporate a temperature-controlled flow cell with precision of ±0.05°C
• Use continuous flow (80 μL/min) of hybridization buffer
• Implement linear temperature ramps from 25°C to 70°C at controlled rates (1-2°C/min) [19]

Melting Curve Analysis:

• Inject target DNA at fixed concentration and monitor hybridization
• Initiate temperature ramp while continuously monitoring SPR signal
• Observe decrease in SPR response as targets dissociate with increasing temperature
• Determine melting temperature (Tₘ) from inflection point of dissociation curve
• Compare with theoretical Tₘ values based on sequence composition [19]

Diagram 1: Causal pathways linking temperature shifts to SPR measurement artifacts, showing the relationship between primary manifestations, underlying mechanisms, and experimental impacts.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Key Research Reagents and Materials for Temperature-Stable SPR Research

Item	Function	Application Notes
CM5 Sensor Chips	Carboxymethylated dextran matrix for ligand immobilization	Standard for amine coupling; ensure consistent surface chemistry across temperatures [17]
HBS-EP Buffer	Running buffer with EDTA and surfactant	Standardized formulation minimizes buffer-induced RI changes; add 3% DMSO for compound solubility [17]
Temperature Calibration Kit	Instrument temperature verification	Validates actual flow cell temperature vs. set point; critical for multi-temperature studies
Ethanolamine-HCl	Blocking reagent for remaining NHS esters	Standardizes surface blocking across experiments; prevents nonspecific binding variations [17]
Carbonic Anhydrase II	Model protein for system validation	Well-characterized binding properties; useful for temperature effect method development [17]
Sulfonamide Inhibitors	Small molecule binders for CAII	Range of affinities and kinetic profiles ideal for temperature dependence studies [17]
Pyrrole-Modified Oligonucleotides	DNA probes for SPR imaging	Enable controlled surface grafting via electropolymerization; spacer arms reduce steric hindrance [19]
NHS/EDC Coupling Reagents	Carboxyl group activation for immobilization	Standard amine coupling chemistry; fresh preparation ensures consistent immobilization efficiency [17]

Mitigation Strategies and Experimental Design Considerations

Temperature Control and System Equilibration

Effective management of temperature effects begins with rigorous temperature control protocols:

System Equilibration Procedures:

• Prime the system extensively after each buffer change to eliminate temperature gradients
• Flow running buffer at experimental flow rate until stable baseline is obtained (typically 5-30 minutes)
• Incorporate start-up cycles with buffer injections to stabilize surfaces before analyte injections
• For temperature-dependent studies, allow additional equilibration time after temperature changes [18]

Experimental Design Optimization:

• Add at least three start-up cycles with buffer injections to 'prime' the surface before data collection
• Space blank injections evenly throughout the experiment (recommended every 5-6 analyte cycles)
• Include both positive and negative controls at each temperature condition
• Utilize double referencing to compensate for residual drift and bulk effects [18] [17]

Advanced Referencing and Data Analysis

Double Referencing Methodology:

• Subtract reference surface signals from active surface signals to compensate for bulk effects
• Additionally subtract blank injection (buffer alone) responses to account for channel-specific drift
• Use reference surfaces that closely match the active surface in immobilization chemistry and matrix properties [18]

Multi-Temperature Analysis Frameworks:

• For heterogeneous binder solutions, conduct experiments at different temperatures to resolve multiple interactants
• Apply Van't Hoff analysis to determine enthalpy (ΔH) and entropy (ΔS) changes from affinity measurements
• Use Eyring equation to extract activation parameters from temperature-dependent kinetic rates [17]

Diagram 2: Experimental workflow for temperature-controlled SPR studies, showing sequential steps from system preparation through data analysis to extract thermodynamic parameters.

Temperature stability represents a fundamental requirement for reliable SPR biosensing, particularly in applications demanding precise kinetic parameter determination or subtle affinity comparison. The direct manifestations of temperature shifts—baseline drift and resonance angle broadening—originate from well-characterized physical phenomena including thermo-optic effects, thermal expansion, and temperature-dependent material properties. Through implementation of rigorous temperature control protocols, appropriate experimental design with proper referencing, and advanced multi-temperature analysis frameworks, researchers can effectively mitigate these confounding factors. Furthermore, strategic exploitation of temperature dependence through Van't Hoff and Eyring analysis enables extraction of valuable thermodynamic parameters, transforming a potential source of experimental error into a rich source of molecular insight. As SPR biosensing continues to expand into new application domains including bioprocess monitoring and point-of-care diagnostics, comprehensive understanding and management of temperature effects will remain essential for data integrity and technological advancement.

This case study provides a numerical analysis of a BK7/TiO2/SiO2/Ag/Au multilayer Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) biosensor, with a specific focus on its performance under temperature variations from 0°C to 100°C. The investigation centers on the structure's enhanced sensitivity and baseline stability, critical parameters for drug development applications requiring precise biomolecular interaction analysis. Results demonstrate that the proposed configuration achieves an angular sensitivity of 345.42 deg/RIU and a temperature coefficient sensitivity of -1020.41 ppm/°C, representing a 139.9% improvement in angular sensitivity over conventional designs. The study establishes a linear relationship between plasmon resonance shifts and simultaneously measured temperature and refractive index changes, providing a framework for reliable biosensing in thermally fluctuating environments.

Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) technology has revolutionized label-free, real-time biomolecular interaction analysis, becoming indispensable in pharmaceutical research and diagnostic development [20]. The stability of the SPR baseline signal is paramount for obtaining reliable kinetic data, particularly in long-term monitoring applications. Temperature fluctuations introduce significant noise and drift in SPR measurements by altering the refractive index (RI) of both the sensor materials and the sensing medium [16] [17]. This case study examines a BK7/TiO2/SiO2/Ag/Au multilayer SPR biosensor within the context of ongoing research into temperature effects on SPR baseline stability. We present a comprehensive numerical analysis of the structure's thermos-optic performance, detailing methodologies for quantifying temperature-dependent effects and validating the sensor's enhanced stability for drug development applications.

Sensor Architecture and Principles

Multilayer Configuration

The proposed SPR sensor follows the Kretschmann configuration for exciting surface plasmons [16]. This attenuated total reflection (ATR)-based structure consists of the following meticulously optimized layers:

• BK7 Prism: Serves as the coupling component for incident light.
• TiO2/SiO2 Nanolayer: Positioned between the prism and metal layers, this nanocomposite efficiently traps incident light, enhancing the electromagnetic field at the interface and facilitating stronger surface plasmon generation.
• Ag/Au Bimetallic Layer: Utilizes silver for its superior plasmonic resonance qualities, capped with a thin gold layer for enhanced chemical stability in biological environments.
• BlueP/MoS2 Heterostructure: A two-dimensional material monolayer that increases adsorption efficiency and provides additional functionalization sites for biomolecules.
• Sensing Medium: The external environment containing the analyte, with ethanol-water mixtures often used for characterization due to their high thermo-optic coefficient.

Working Principle

SPR biosensors function by exciting coherent electron oscillations (surface plasmons) at the metal-dielectric interface using p-polarized light [20]. At a specific incident angle (resonance angle), photon energy transfers to surface plasmons, causing a sharp dip in reflected light intensity. Any change in the refractive index near the metal surface—whether from biomolecular binding or temperature variation—alters the resonance condition, shifting the resonance angle [16] [20]. The multilayer design enhances this sensitivity through strategic material selection and layer optimization to maximize the evanescent field and its interaction with the sensing medium.

Thermo-Optic Properties and Temperature Effects

Temperature Dependence in SPR Systems

Temperature variations affect SPR biosensors through multiple mechanisms: altering the refractive indices of all constituent materials, changing the physical dimensions of layers through thermal expansion, and modifying binding kinetics in biological interactions [16]. For the BK7/TiO2/SiO2/Ag/Au structure, these effects collectively influence the resonance condition, with the refractive index changes in the sensing medium and metallic layers being particularly significant.

Table 1: Temperature-Dependent Refractive Index Properties of Sensor Materials

Material	Refractive Index	Thermo-Optic Coefficient	Temperature Dependency
BK7 Prism	1.5151 @ 632.8 nm	~10⁻⁶/°C	Negligible variation in operating range
TiO₂	2.5837 @ 632.8 nm	Not specified in study	Accounted for in model
Ag	0.056206 + 4.2776i @ 632.8 nm	Temperature-dependent	Critical for resonance shift
Au	Metallic dispersion model	Temperature-dependent	Critical for resonance shift
Ethanol	1.36048 @ 20°C	-3.98×10⁻⁴/°C	Linear: n = 1.36048 - 3.98×10⁻⁴(T-T₀)
SiO₂	~1.46	Not specified in study	Accounted for in model

Performance Metrics Under Temperature Variation

The sensor's performance was numerically analyzed across a temperature range of 0°C to 100°C, revealing significantly enhanced characteristics compared to conventional designs:

Table 2: Performance Comparison of SPR Sensor Structures

Performance Parameter	BK7/TiO₂/SiO₂/Ag/Au/BlueP-MoS₂	Conventional BK7/Ag/Au	Improvement
Angular Sensitivity	345.42 deg/RIU	144 deg/RIU	139.9%
Temperature Coefficient Sensitivity	-1020.41 ppm/°C	Not reported	Significant enhancement
Detection Accuracy	49.76 RIU⁻¹	38.6 RIU⁻¹	29%
Figure of Merit (FOM)	48.02 RIU⁻¹ (for cancer detection)	Not directly comparable	High performance
Resonance Angle Shift	Linear with temperature	More pronounced drift	Enhanced stability

The temperature coefficient sensitivity of -1020.41 ppm/°C indicates a strong, predictable response to thermal changes, enabling effective compensation strategies for baseline stabilization [16]. The linear relationship between resonance shift and temperature facilitates straightforward calibration, while the enhanced angular sensitivity allows detection of smaller refractive index changes amid thermal noise.

Numerical Methods and Experimental Protocols

Computational Modeling Approach

The numerical analysis employed the Finite Element Method (FEM) using COMSOL Multiphysics software to solve Maxwell's equations across the multilayer structure [16]. The model incorporated temperature-dependent refractive indices for all materials, with the metal layers described using appropriate dispersion models. The transfer matrix method provided supplementary validation for specific optical calculations [21].

The following dot code defines the workflow for the numerical analysis and temperature-dependent characterization:

Temperature-Dependent Characterization Protocol

For experimental validation of temperature effects, the following protocol is recommended:

• Sensor Chip Preparation: Fabricate the multilayer structure using physical vapor deposition for metal and oxide layers, followed by chemical vapor deposition for 2D material transfer.

• Temperature Control System: Implement a precision thermal stage with ±0.05°C accuracy, incorporating a negative temperature coefficient resistor for real-time monitoring [19].

• SPR Measurement Setup: Configure a Kretschmann-type SPR instrument with a p-polarized He-Ne laser source (632.8 nm) and angular scanning detection.

• Reference Medium Calibration: Perform measurements using ethanol-water mixtures with known thermo-optic coefficients across the temperature range (0°C to 100°C).

• Data Acquisition: Record reflectance spectra at multiple angles for each temperature point, ensuring system equilibration at each setting.

• Parameter Extraction: Determine resonance angles from reflectance minima and calculate sensitivity values using established formulas.

Results and Discussion

Temperature Effects on Resonance Conditions

Numerical results demonstrate a linear shift in plasmon resonance with simultaneously measured temperature and refractive index changes [16]. The resonance angle exhibits a predictable relationship with temperature, enabling compensation algorithms for baseline stabilization. The TiO2/SiO2 nanocomposite layer plays a critical role in efficiently trapping light near the metal interface, thereby enhancing the SPR resonance angle and improving temperature sensitivity.

The Ag/Au bimetallic configuration leverages silver's superior plasmonic properties while maintaining gold's chemical stability for biological applications. This combination results in sharper resonance dips and improved signal-to-noise ratios compared to single-metal configurations [16] [22]. The BlueP/MoS2 heterostructure further enhances sensitivity through increased biomolecular adsorption and field confinement.

Field Enhancement and Signal Quality

The proposed structure exhibits a significant decrease in minimum reflectance and increased field intensity at resonance as temperature varies. The enhanced field confinement at the TiO2/SiO2/metal interface contributes to improved temperature coefficient sensitivity while maintaining signal quality across the operational temperature range. This characteristic is particularly valuable for long-term binding studies where temperature fluctuations might otherwise compromise data integrity.

Implications for Biosensing Applications

The exceptional temperature stability of the BK7/TiO2/SiO2/Ag/Au structure makes it particularly suitable for pharmaceutical applications requiring precise kinetic parameter determination. The sensor's ability to maintain baseline stability during temperature variations enables more accurate determination of association and dissociation constants in drug candidate screening [17].

For cancer detection applications, the sensor achieves notable sensitivities: 292.86 deg/RIU for breast cancer cells (MCF-7) and 245.83 deg/RIU for cervical cancer cells (HeLa) [23]. These values significantly exceed conventional SPR designs, highlighting the practical benefits of the multilayer approach for demanding biosensing applications.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Key Research Reagents and Materials for SPR Sensor Implementation

Material/Reagent	Function in SPR System	Specifications/Alternatives
BK7 Prism	Optical coupling component for SPR excitation	High purity, precise cutting angles
TiO2 Target	Sputtering source for high-RI dielectric layer	99.99% purity, anatase or rutile phase
SiO2 Target	Sputtering source for light-trapping layer	99.99% purity, controlled stoichiometry
Ag and Au Targets	Thermal or e-beam evaporation sources	99.999% purity, controlled deposition rates
BlueP/MoS2 Heterostructure	2D material for sensitivity enhancement	CVD-grown monolayers, controlled transfer
Ethanol-Water Mixtures	Thermo-optic calibration media	Varying ratios (0-100%), known dn/dT
Carbonic Anhydrase II	Model protein for binding studies	Immobilized ligand for inhibitor screening
HBS-EP Buffer	Running buffer for biomolecular interactions	10mM HEPES, 150mM NaCl, 3mM EDTA, 0.05% P20
CMS Sensor Chips	Commercial alternative for comparison	Carboxymethylated dextran matrix

Signaling Pathways and Molecular Interactions

The following dot code illustrates the relationship between temperature changes, material properties, and the resulting SPR signal outputs that form the basis for biosensing applications:

This numerical analysis demonstrates that the BK7/TiO2/SiO2/Ag/Au multilayer SPR biosensor architecture exhibits significantly enhanced angular sensitivity (345.42 deg/RIU) and temperature coefficient sensitivity (-1020.41 ppm/°C) compared to conventional designs. The strategic incorporation of TiO2/SiO2 nanocomposite and BlueP/MoS2 heterostructure layers enables superior light trapping and field enhancement, resulting in improved temperature stability and detection accuracy. These characteristics make the proposed sensor particularly valuable for drug development applications requiring precise biomolecular interaction analysis under varying thermal conditions. Future work should focus on experimental validation of these numerical findings and development of advanced temperature compensation algorithms for further stabilization of SPR baseline signals in real-world applications.

Strategic Temperature Management: From Passive Control to Active Exploitation in SPR Assays

Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) is a powerful, label-free technology for real-time analysis of biomolecular interactions, enabling the determination of binding kinetics and affinity [24] [25]. The core principle relies on detecting changes in the refractive index at a sensor surface, a measurement exquisitely sensitive to environmental fluctuations [25]. Within the context of broader research on temperature effects on SPR baseline stability, maintaining a controlled instrumental environment is not merely beneficial but fundamental to data integrity. Baseline stability is the cornerstone of reliable SPR analysis; drift and excessive noise can obscure genuine binding signals and lead to erroneous kinetic constants [18]. This guide details the core best practices of degassing and temperature control, which are critical for achieving the stable environment required to accurately investigate the specific impacts of temperature on molecular interactions.

The Critical Role of a Stable SPR Baseline

The SPR signal, measured in Resonance Units (RU), is proportional to the mass bound to the sensor surface [25]. A stable baseline indicates an equilibrated system where changes in RU can be confidently attributed to molecular binding events. Conversely, baseline drift—a gradual rise or fall of the signal—complicates data interpretation and compromises quantitative analysis.

Baseline drift is frequently a sign of a non-optimally equilibrated system [18]. Common causes include:

• Insufficient system equilibration: After docking a new sensor chip or immobilizing a ligand, the surface requires time to rehydrate and adjust to the flow buffer [18].
• Buffer-related issues: Changes in running buffer composition or temperature can cause refractive index shifts. Failure to properly prime the system after a buffer change leads to mixing in the pump, manifesting as a "waviness pump stroke" in the signal [18].
• Temperature fluctuations: Variations in temperature directly alter the refractive index of the buffer and can affect the binding kinetics of the interaction itself, inducing drift.

Proper practices in degassing and temperature control directly mitigate these sources of instability, creating a foundation for robust research into temperature-dependent binding phenomena.

Foundational Best Practices for System Equilibration

Before addressing specific techniques, general system equilibration is essential. The instrument and sensor surface must be fully stabilized before collecting data.

• Buffer Preparation: Ideally, prepare buffers fresh daily. Filter through a 0.22 µM filter and degas before use. Storage conditions matter; buffers stored at 4°C contain more dissolved air, which can create air-spikes in the sensorgram [18].
• System Priming: After any buffer change, prime the system thoroughly to eliminate the previous buffer from the pumps and tubing. Flow running buffer at the experimental flow rate until a stable baseline is obtained [18].
• Start-up Cycles: Incorporate at least three start-up cycles into the experimental method. These are identical to analyte cycles but inject running buffer instead. This "primes" the surface and accounts for initial stabilization, especially after regeneration steps. These cycles should be excluded from the final analysis [18].

Table 1: Essential Reagent Solutions for SPR Baseline Stability

Reagent/Solution	Function	Key Considerations
Running Buffer	Provides the liquid environment for interactions; its consistent composition is vital for stable baselines.	Prepare fresh daily; 0.22 µM filter and degas; match composition exactly to analyte buffer to minimize bulk shifts [18] [26].
Detergent (e.g., Tween 20)	Reduces non-specific binding (NSB) to the sensor surface and fluidics.	Typically used at low concentrations (e.g., 0.05%); add after filtering and degassing to avoid foam formation [18] [25].
Regeneration Solution	Removes bound analyte from the immobilized ligand to regenerate the surface for the next cycle.	Must be harsh enough to remove analyte but mild enough to not damage ligand activity. Scouting is required [26].
System Cleaning Reagents	Maintains instrument hygiene by removing accumulated contaminants from the fluidics.	Includes solutions like Desorb 1 and Desorb 2; use according to instrument manufacturer schedules [25].

The Essential Practice of Buffer Degassing

The Problem of Dissolved Air

Dissolved air in running buffer is a primary source of signal noise and instability. As buffer travels through the SPR instrument under pressure, small air bubbles can nucleate and form micro-bubbles. These bubbles passing through the flow cell cause spikes in the sensorgram—sharp, abrupt response changes that can ruin a binding curve [18]. Furthermore, the gradual outgassing of dissolved air can contribute to a drifting baseline as the refractive index of the solution slowly changes.

Degassing Methodology

Degassing is the process of removing dissolved gases from the buffer solution. The standard protocol involves:

• Preparation: First, prepare the running buffer and filter it through a 0.22 µM membrane. Filtering helps remove particulates that could serve as nucleation sites for bubbles.
• Degassing: Use an in-line degasser or degas the buffer reservoir prior to use. In-line degassers create a vacuum through a gas-permeable membrane, pulling dissolved gases out of the buffer.
• Post-degas Handling: After degassing, add detergents like Tween 20 to avoid foam formation. Transfer an aliquot of the buffer to a clean bottle for immediate use. Avoid adding fresh buffer to old, stored buffer, as microbial growth or contamination can introduce new sources of instability [18].

Temperature Control as a Key to Baseline Stability

Impact of Temperature on SPR Signals

Temperature exerts a profound influence on SPR data through multiple mechanisms:

• Refractive Index (RI): The RI of the running buffer is highly temperature-dependent. Minute temperature fluctuations directly change the RI, which the SPR instrument detects as a change in mass concentration, leading to baseline drift.
• Binding Kinetics: The rates of molecular association (ka) and dissociation (kd) are intrinsically linked to temperature. Research into temperature effects on baseline stability must, therefore, decouple thermal noise from genuine thermodynamic and kinetic phenomena.
• Biomolecule Stability: Proteins and other biomolecules can undergo conformational changes or aggregation at suboptimal temperatures, affecting their activity and binding properties.

Modern SPR instruments like the Biacore T200 feature precise Temperature Control (4-45°C) [25], which is essential for both stabilizing the baseline and for conducting controlled thermodynamic studies.

Best Practices for Temperature Control

• Consistent Setpoint: Select a physiologically or experimentally relevant temperature and maintain it consistently throughout the experiment and across related experiments. Allow the instrument sufficient time to equilibrate after setting the temperature.
• Buffer Matching: Ensure that all buffers and analyte samples are at the same temperature as the instrument and running buffer before injection. Introducing a solution at a different temperature causes a significant bulk RI shift, appearing as a large square-shaped artifact during injection [26].
• Minimize Environmental Fluctuations: Place the instrument in a location away from drafts, direct sunlight, or heating/cooling vents to reduce the load on its internal temperature control system.

Integrated Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Standardized Buffer Preparation and System Startup

This protocol ensures a stable foundation for any SPR experiment, particularly those investigating temperature effects.

Detailed Methodology:

• Buffer Preparation: Prepare two liters of running buffer using high-purity water and analytical-grade salts. Filter the buffer through a 0.22 µM sterile filter into a clean, sterile bottle.
• Degassing: Degas the buffer using an in-line degasser or by placing the buffer bottle under vacuum with gentle stirring for 20-30 minutes.
• Additive Introduction: After degassing, add a non-ionic surfactant (e.g., Tween 20) to a final concentration of 0.05% (v/v) to minimize non-specific binding.
• System Priming: Load the degassed buffer into the instrument. Perform a prime procedure at least three times to ensure the entire fluidic path is filled with the new, degassed buffer.
• Baseline Equilibration: Start a constant flow of running buffer at the intended experimental flow rate. Monitor the baseline response until the drift rate falls below a pre-defined acceptable threshold (e.g., < 1 RU/min). This may take 30 minutes to several hours for a new sensor chip [18].

Protocol 2: Temperature Equilibration and Blank Injection Cycle

This protocol is critical for experiments where temperature is a key variable, ensuring the system is thermally stable before data collection.

Detailed Methodology:

• Set Temperature: After system startup (Protocol 1), set the instrument and autosampler to the desired experimental temperature.
• Thermal Equilibration: Allow a minimum of 1-2 hours for the entire system—including the fluidics, sensor chip, and stored samples—to reach thermal equilibrium. Monitor the baseline to confirm stability.
• Blank Injections: Program and execute a series of at least three "blank" or "start-up" cycles. These cycles should mimic the experimental method, including the regeneration step if used, but inject running buffer instead of analyte.
• Stability Check: Analyze the sensorgrams from the blank injections. The baseline before and after each injection should be flat and return to the same level, indicating thermal and chemical equilibrium has been achieved. These cycles are discarded and not used in analysis [18].

Troubleshooting Common Instability Issues

Even with careful preparation, instability can occur. The table below guides systematic troubleshooting.

Table 2: Troubleshooting Guide for Baseline Drift and Noise

Problem	Potential Cause	Recommended Solution
High-Frequency Noise	Micro-bubbles in the fluidics due to improperly degassed buffer.	Re-degas running buffer thoroughly. Ensure buffer reservoirs are sealed and no air leaks exist in the fluidic path.
Consistent Baseline Drift	Temperature fluctuation in the lab or instrument.	Verify instrument temperature control is functioning. Place instrument in a temperature-stable environment. Ensure all solutions are at set temperature.
	System still equilibrating after chip docking or buffer change.	Extend the buffer flow equilibration time. Incorporate more start-up cycles with buffer injections.
Bulk Refractive Index Shifts	Mismatch between running buffer and analyte sample buffer.	Dialyze the analyte into the running buffer. Preferentially, prepare the analyte dilution series directly from the running buffer stock.
Drift After Regeneration	Regeneration solution altering the surface properties or requiring longer equilibration.	Increase the post-regeneration stabilization time in the method. Ensure the regeneration solution is thoroughly washed away.

The pursuit of high-quality, publication-ready SPR data, especially within research focused on the effects of temperature on binding interactions, demands rigorous instrumental control. As detailed in this guide, buffer degassing and precise temperature control are not optional steps but foundational prerequisites for achieving a stable baseline. By systematically implementing the protocols for buffer preparation, system equilibration, and temperature stabilization, researchers can create a controlled experimental environment. This practice minimizes artifacts, reduces noise, and ensures that the observed signals truthfully represent the underlying biomolecular interaction kinetics and thermodynamics, thereby solidifying the validity of their scientific conclusions.

The study of biomolecular interactions, such as those involving G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) and the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD), often reveals complex kinetics that are challenging to resolve under standard physiological temperatures. Low-temperature kinetics, particularly employing cooled assays at 10°C, has emerged as a powerful methodological approach to decouple these intricate interaction pathways. This technique significantly slows dissociation rates and reduces the energy of the system, allowing for the precise observation of intermediate states and more accurate determination of kinetic parameters that would otherwise be obscured at higher temperatures.

The foundation of this approach rests on fundamental biophysical principles. Molecular interactions follow an energy landscape where complexes can populate multiple conformational states with distinct kinetic profiles. At physiological temperatures (37°C), the rapid interconversion between these states often creates an averaged signal that masks underlying complexity. By reducing thermal energy, cooled assays effectively "freeze" these transitional states, permitting their individual characterization. This technical guide explores the application of low-temperature kinetics to two biologically significant systems: GPCR-G protein interactions and SARS-CoV-2 RBD variant binding to ACE2, with particular emphasis on implications for surface plasmon resonance (SPR) baseline stability and data quality.

Theoretical Foundation: Temperature Effects on Biomolecular Interactions

Kinetic and Thermodynamic Principles

Biomolecular binding events are governed by both kinetic rate constants (association rate, kₒₙ, and dissociation rate, kₒff) and thermodynamic parameters (enthalpy, ΔH, and entropy, ΔS). Temperature reduction systematically affects these parameters according to the Arrhenius equation and transition state theory. The dissociation constant K({}_{\text{D}}) = kₒff/kₒₙ demonstrates pronounced temperature dependence, with cooled conditions typically strengthening affinity through dramatic reduction of kₒff.

The thermodynamic relationship is formally described by the van't Hoff equation: [\ln(K{\text{D}}) = \frac{\Delta H}{RT} - \frac{\Delta S}{R}] where R is the gas constant and T is temperature in Kelvin. For protein-protein interactions like RBD-ACE2, the binding is often enthalpically driven with favorable ΔH, resulting in tighter binding (lower K({}{\text{D}})) at reduced temperatures. This phenomenon has been extensively documented in SARS-CoV-2 RBD-ACE2 interactions, where lower temperatures significantly increase RBD-ACE2 affinity through slower dissociation kinetics [27] [28].

Technical Advantages for SPR Baseline Stability

Surface plasmon resonance measurements are particularly susceptible to experimental temperature fluctuations. The refractive index changes with temperature, introducing significant baseline drift that complicates kinetic analysis. Maintaining consistently cooled environments (e.g., 10°C) provides exceptional SPR baseline stability by minimizing thermal perturbations. This stability is crucial for acquiring high-fidelity sensorgrams that can be accurately fit to appropriate binding models.

Research has demonstrated that performing SPR at 10°C enables excellent fits to a 1:1 Langmuir binding model, with χ² values consequentially aligned with biosensor noise levels (approximately 10⁻²) [7]. As temperature increases to 25°C and 37°C, residual plots show distinct curvatures and spikes, indicating deviation from simple binding behavior. Thus, cooled assays provide the experimental precision necessary for robust kinetic characterization of complex biological interactions.

Application to SARS-CoV-2 RBD Variant Analysis

Temperature-Dependent Affinity Enhancements

The interaction between SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein's receptor-binding domain (RBD) and human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) represents a critical determinant of viral infectivity. Systematic investigations have revealed that reduced temperatures significantly enhance this interaction across multiple variants. At 10°C, the binding affinity substantially increases due to slower dissociation kinetics, enabling clearer resolution of variant-specific differences [27] [28].

Table 1: Kinetic Parameters of SARS-CoV-2 RBD Variants Binding to ACE2 at 10°C

Variant	Mutations	kₒₙ (10⁴ M⁻¹s⁻¹)	kₒff (10⁻³ s⁻¹)	K({}_{\text{D}}) (nM)
Wild Type	None	4.21 ± 0.08	7.01 ± 0.22	16.6 ± 0.6
Alpha	N501Y	3.ka99 ± 0.11	2.88 ± 0.12	7.2 ± 0.4
Beta	K417N, E484K, N501Y	5.63 ± 0.14	2.92 ± 0.10	5.2 ± 0.2
Delta	L452R, T478K	10.71 ± 0.41	9.95 ± 0.52	9.3 ± 0.6
Omicron	Multiple	5.84 ± 0.19	1.85 ± 0.08	3.2 ± 0.1

Data adapted from SCIENTIFIC REPORTS [7]

Notably, the L452R mutation present in Delta and Kappa variants accelerates both association and dissociation rates, while the N501Y mutation enhances affinity primarily through reduced dissociation. The exceptional affinity of Omicron variants is attributable to extremely slow dissociation kinetics, particularly evident at 10°C [7].

Experimental Protocol: SPR Analysis of RBD-ACE2 Binding at 10°C

Materials and Reagents:

• Recombinant ACE2 extracellular domain with C-terminal E5 coil tag (ACE2-E5)
• RBD variants with His-tag
• K5 coil peptide biosensor surface
• HBS-EP+ running buffer (10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 3 mM EDTA, 0.05% v/v Surfactant P20, pH 7.4)
• Regeneration solution: 6 M guanidium chloride

SPR Experimental Procedure:

• Surface Preparation: Covalently immobilize K5 coil peptides onto CMS sensor chips via standard amine coupling to achieve approximately 8-10 kRU response.

• Ligand Capture: Inject ACE2-E5 (5 μg/mL) for 60 seconds to capture consistent levels (~60 RU) onto the K5 surface through coiled-coil heterodimerization.

• Binding Analysis: Inject RBD variants (0.6-100 nM) for 180-second association phase followed by 600-second dissociation phase in HBS-EP+ buffer at 10°C.

• Surface Regeneration: Remove bound ACE2-E5 and RBD with 30-second pulse of 6 M guanidium chloride, enabling fresh ligand capture for each cycle.

• Data Processing: Double-reference sensorgrams by subtracting reference flow cell and blank injections. Fit processed data to a 1:1 Langmuir binding model to determine kₒₙ, kₒff, and K({}_{\text{D}}).

This coiled-coil capture approach combined with low-temperature operation minimizes mass transport limitations and non-specific binding artifacts, yielding exceptionally clean kinetic data [7].

Application to GPCR-G Protein Complex Formation

Resolving Kinetic Intermediates in GPCR Signaling

G-protein coupled receptors represent a major class of drug targets characterized by complex signaling mechanisms involving multiple conformational states. Traditional equilibrium models fail to capture the transient nature of GPCR-G protein interactions, which occur on timescales comparable to or longer than downstream signaling events. Low-temperature kinetics has proven essential for resolving the multi-state behavior of these complexes [29].

Investigations of β({}{2})-adrenergic receptor (β({}{2})AR) interactions with its cognate G({}_{\text{s}}) protein using stopped-flow FRET assays at reduced temperatures have identified two distinct kinetic intermediates with markedly different dissociation rates. The strongly interacting state (75% population) exhibits very slow dissociation (kₒff = 0.006 s⁻¹), while the weakly interacting state dissociates more rapidly (kₒff = 0.3 s⁻¹) [29]. This heterogeneity reflects distinct receptor conformations that interconvert slowly, with rate constants ≤0.007 s⁻¹.

Table 2: Kinetic States in β({}_{2})AR-G({}_{\text{s}}) Peptide Interactions

Interaction State	Population	Dissociation Rate (kₒff)	Lifetime (t({}_{1/2}))	Proposed Character
Weak Interaction	25%	0.3 s⁻¹	~2.3 s	Transient complex, rapid signaling
Strong Interaction	75%	0.006 s⁻¹	~115 s	Stable complex, sustained signaling

Data adapted from NATURE COMMUNICATIONS [29]

Experimental Protocol: Stopped-Flow FRET Analysis of GPCR-G Protein Kinetics

Materials and Reagents:

• SPASM biosensor (β({}_{2})AR-Spep FRET pair)
• G protein mimetic nanobody (Nb6B9, 10 μM)
• Agonist solutions (e.g., 100 μM isoproterenol)
• Appropriate membrane preparation buffer

Stopped-Flow FRET Procedure:

• Sample Preparation: Pre-incubate β({}_{2})AR-Spep SPASM sensor in crude membrane preparations with saturating agonist (100 μM isoproterenol) for 30 minutes at 10°C.

• Instrument Setup: Configure stopped-flow fluorimeter with temperature control maintained at 10°C. Set excitation wavelength for donor fluorophore and appropriate emission filters for FRET detection.

• Kinetic Measurement: Rapidly mix equal volumes (50-100 μL) of agonist-bound β({}_{2})AR-Spep sensor and Nb6B9 quenching solution (10 μM final). Monitor FRET signal decrease over time (0.1-100 s timeframe).

• Data Analysis: Fit FRET decay profiles to multi-exponential model incorporating membrane equilibration component. Extract kinetic parameters for distinct interaction states.

The reduced temperature slows otherwise rapid conformational exchanges, enabling clear resolution of multiple kinetic phases in GPCR-G protein complex formation and dissociation [29].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Research Reagent Solutions for Low-Temperature Kinetic Studies

Reagent/Material	Function	Application Examples
Coiled-Coil Peptide Tags (E5/K5 system)	Oriented, stable capture of ligands on biosensor surfaces	SPR analysis of RBD-ACE2 interactions [7]
SPASM Biosensors	Intramolecular FRET reporters of protein-protein interactions	GPCR-G protein interaction kinetics [29]
G Protein Mimetic Nanobodies (e.g., Nb6B9)	High-affinity competitors for displacement assays	Stopped-flow FRET quenching experiments [29]
Glycoengineered ACE2 Variants	Investigation of glycan effects on binding interactions	SPR analysis of RBD binding to different ACE2 glycovariants [7]
Temperature-Controlled Stopped-Flow	Rapid mixing with precise temperature control (10°C)	Fast kinetics of GPCR complex formation [29]
Stable SPR Surfaces (e.g., CMS chips with K5 immobilization)	Low-drift biosensor surfaces for cooled assays	Long-duration kinetic measurements [7]

Low-temperature kinetic analysis at 10°C provides a powerful, technically accessible approach for resolving complex biomolecular interactions that remain obscured under standard experimental conditions. The methodological framework presented here for both SARS-CoV-2 RBD-ACE2 binding and GPCR-G protein interactions demonstrates how cooled assays enhance signal stability, enable precise kinetic resolution, and facilitate accurate modeling of multi-state binding mechanisms. For SPR studies specifically, the implementation of 10°C assays significantly improves baseline stability and data quality, allowing researchers to extract meaningful kinetic parameters from complex biological systems. As molecular interaction analysis continues to evolve toward more physiologically relevant but complex systems, low-temperature kinetics will remain an essential tool in the biophysicist's arsenal for deciphering the intricate mechanisms underlying cellular signaling and pathogen recognition.

Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) biosensing has evolved from a tool for simple binding confirmation to a powerful platform for comprehensive interaction analysis. By employing multi-temperature experiments, researchers can extract detailed thermodynamic parameters that define the fundamental forces driving biomolecular interactions. The integration of Van't Hoff analysis provides a robust framework for quantifying the enthalpy (ΔH) and entropy (ΔS) changes associated with binding events, offering insights beyond conventional kinetic profiling. Within the context of temperature effects on SPR baseline stability research, understanding these thermodynamic principles becomes crucial for distinguishing true molecular interactions from temperature-induced artifacts [17] [10].

The strategic application of temperature variation in SPR experiments enables researchers to construct a complete thermodynamic profile of molecular interactions. This approach has been successfully validated across diverse systems, from small molecule-protein interactions to antibody-antigen binding, demonstrating that SPR-derived thermodynamic parameters show remarkable consistency with solution-based methods like isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) [30] [31]. For instance, in studies of carbonic anhydrase II binders, SPR-based thermodynamic analysis reliably matched results obtained from ITC, establishing confidence in surface-based measurements [30]. This concordance underscores the reliability of properly executed multi-temperature SPR experiments for detailed mechanistic studies.

Theoretical Framework of Van't Hoff Analysis

Fundamental Equations

The Van't Hoff equation describes the temperature dependence of the equilibrium constant (K) and provides access to thermodynamic parameters through analysis of this relationship. The integrated form of the equation enables the determination of enthalpy and entropy changes from experimental data:

• Linear Form: lnK = -ΔH°/RT + ΔS°/R
• Two-Temperature Form: ln(K₂/K₁) = (ΔH°/R)(1/T₁ - 1/T₂)

where K represents the equilibrium constant at absolute temperature T, ΔH° is the standard enthalpy change, ΔS° is the standard entropy change, and R is the universal gas constant [32]. In SPR biosensing, the equilibrium constant (K) is typically expressed as the association constant (Kₐ = 1/Kᴅ), where Kᴅ is the dissociation constant obtained from kinetic analysis or steady-state binding measurements [33].

The Van't Hoff plot serves as the primary visualization tool, with lnK plotted against the reciprocal of absolute temperature (1/T). The slope of the resulting linear relationship equals -ΔH°/R, while the intercept provides ΔS°/R [32]. Significant curvature in the Van't Hoff plot indicates temperature-dependent heat capacity changes (ΔCᴘ), requiring more complex modeling to extract accurate thermodynamic parameters [33].

Relationship to Binding Affinity

The equilibrium constant derived from Van't Hoff analysis connects directly to the Gibbs free energy change through the fundamental relationship:

ΔG° = -RTlnK = ΔH° - TΔS°

This equation reveals that binding affinity (ΔG°) is determined by the balance between enthalpic (ΔH°) and entropic (ΔS°) contributions [33] [31]. Enthalpy-driven binding typically results from specific molecular interactions like hydrogen bonds and van der Waals forces, while entropy-driven binding often reflects hydrophobic effects and changes in molecular flexibility [31]. Understanding this balance provides critical insights for drug discovery, where enthalpically optimized compounds often demonstrate superior selectivity [31].

Table 1: Thermodynamic Parameters and Their Molecular Interpretation

Parameter	Symbol	Molecular Interpretation	Typical Values in Drug Discovery
Gibbs Free Energy	ΔG°	Overall binding affinity	-30 to -60 kJ/mol
Enthalpy	ΔH°	Bond formation/breaking, non-covalent interactions	-50 to +20 kJ/mol
Entropy	ΔS°	Solvent reorganization, molecular flexibility	-150 to +100 J/(mol·K)
Heat Capacity	ΔCᴘ	Burial of surface area, conformational changes	-0.5 to -2.5 kJ/(mol·K)

Experimental Design and Workflow

Temperature Selection and Optimization

Designing a robust multi-temperature SPR experiment requires strategic temperature selection to ensure accurate Van't Hoff analysis. Research indicates that a minimum of four temperatures spanning a 15-20°C range provides sufficient data for reliable parameter estimation [17] [33]. For most biological systems, a practical temperature range falls between 4-37°C, though this must be tailored to the stability of the interacting partners. When investigating carbonic anhydrase II binders, temperatures of 12, 16, 20, and 24°C proved effective for thermodynamic parameter extraction [17].

Critical considerations for temperature selection include:

• Protein Stability: Ensure temperatures remain within the functional range for all binding partners
• Buffer Compatibility: Account for temperature-dependent pH changes that could affect binding
• Instrument Performance: Verify temperature calibration and stability across the selected range
• Baseline Stability: Monitor for temperature-induced drift that could compromise data quality [10]

For studies focused on SPR baseline stability, it is essential to implement thorough system checks before data collection, including buffer injections at each temperature to characterize temperature-specific baseline behavior [10].

SPR Experimental Protocol

The following workflow outlines a standardized approach for multi-temperature SPR data collection for thermodynamic analysis:

Surface Preparation and Ligand Immobilization: Immobilize the ligand (typically the larger binding partner) using appropriate chemistry. For protein targets, amine coupling via EDC/NHS chemistry to carboxymethylated dextran surfaces (e.g., CM5 chips) has been successfully employed in thermodynamic studies [30] [33]. Maintain low immobilization levels (50-100 RU for proteins) to minimize mass transport limitations and rebinding artifacts [33].

Sample Injection Series: For each temperature, inject a concentration series of the analyte spanning at least a 10-fold range above and below the expected Kᴅ. Include replicate injections and blank buffer samples for double-referencing purposes. Employ flow rates ≥85 μL/min to reduce mass transport effects, particularly for faster binding interactions [17] [30].

Data Collection Parameters: Use extended association phases to reach steady-state binding (particularly important for slow binders) and sufficient dissociation time to establish reliable off-rates. For carbonic anhydrase II binders, injection times of 240 seconds and dissociation times of 270-570 seconds (adjusted per analyte and temperature) allowed complete dissociation without regeneration [17].

Research Reagent Solutions

Table 2: Essential Reagents for SPR Thermodynamic Studies

Reagent/Chemical	Function in Experiment	Example Application
CM5 Sensor Chip	Three-dimensional dextran matrix for ligand immobilization	Carbonic anhydrase II immobilization for small molecule binding studies [17] [30]
EDC/NHS	Amine coupling chemistry activation	Immobilization of proteins via surface amine groups [17] [34]
HBS-EP Buffer	Standard running buffer with EDTA and surfactant	Maintains consistent ionic strength and reduces non-specific binding [17]
Ethanolamine-HCl	Blocking reagent for remaining active esters	Deactivates unreacted NHS esters after immobilization [17] [30]
Carboxylic Acid-terminated SAM	Alternative surface chemistry for immobilization	Formation of self-assembled monolayers for antibody immobilization [34]

Data Analysis and Interpretation

Equilibrium Constant Determination

Accurate determination of equilibrium constants at each temperature forms the foundation of reliable Van't Hoff analysis. Two primary approaches can be employed:

Steady-State Response Analysis: Measure the binding response at equilibrium for each analyte concentration and fit to a 1:1 binding model: Response = Rₘₐₓ × C / (Kᴅ + C) where Rₘₐₓ is the maximum binding capacity and C is the analyte concentration [33].

Kinetic Constant Conversion: Determine the association (kₒₙ) and dissociation (kₒff) rate constants through global fitting of the binding sensorgrams, then calculate Kᴅ as kₒff/kₒₙ [30]. This approach often provides more reliable Kᴅ values, particularly for slow binders that may not reach complete steady-state within practical injection times [33].

For carbonic anhydrase II binders, the kinetic approach yielded Kᴅ values consistent with solution-based methods, with mean values of 760 ± 30 nM for CBS and 340 ± 40 nM for DNSA at 25°C [30].

Van't Hoff Plot Construction and Analysis

With equilibrium constants determined across the temperature series, construct the Van't Hoff plot by graphing lnK (where K = 1/Kᴅ) against 1/T. Fit the data using linear regression for systems with constant ΔH°, or polynomial regression for systems with significant ΔCᴘ [33] [32].

Linear Van't Hoff Analysis:

• Slope = -ΔH°/R
• Intercept = ΔS°/R

For systems exhibiting curvature in the Van't Hoff plot, the integrated form incorporating ΔCᴘ should be applied: lnK = -ΔH°ₜ₀/RT + ΔS°ₜ₀/R + (ΔCᴘ/R)[(T-T₀)/T - ln(T/T₀))] where T₀ is a reference temperature [33].

In nanobody-EGF interaction studies, significant curvature in Van't Hoff plots indicated substantial heat capacity changes, requiring this more complex modeling for accurate parameter estimation [33].

Advanced Thermodynamic Parameters

Beyond the basic enthalpy and entropy determinations, temperature-dependent SPR data enables calculation of advanced thermodynamic parameters:

Heat Capacity Change (ΔCᴘ): Determined from the temperature dependence of ΔH (ΔCᴘ = dΔH/dT). Negative ΔCᴘ values typically indicate burial of nonpolar surface area upon binding [33] [31].

Transition State Thermodynamics: By combining kinetic and thermodynamic data, parameters for the binding transition state can be derived, providing insights into the energy landscape of the interaction [31].

Table 3: Thermodynamic Data from Representative SPR Studies

Interaction System	Temperature Range (°C)	ΔG° (kJ/mol)	ΔH° (kJ/mol)	ΔS° (J/mol·K)	Reference
CAII/CBS	12-24	-8.3 ± 0.3	-11.6 ± 0.4	-11 ± 1	[30]
CAII/DNSA	12-24	-8.8 ± 0.9	-5.7 ± 0.4	11 ± 1	[30]
Nanobody Nb1/EGF	9-37	~-50	~-80	~-100	[33]
Nanobody Nb6/EGF	9-37	~-45	~-60	~-50	[33]

Applications in Drug Discovery and Development

Fragment-Based Drug Discovery

Thermodynamic profiling has emerged as a powerful tool in fragment-based drug discovery (FBDD), enabling informed selection of starting points for optimization. The concept of enthalpic efficiency (EE), defined as ΔH° per heavy atom, complements traditional metrics like ligand efficiency (LE) by highlighting fragments that form high-quality interactions with their targets [31].

In FBDD campaigns, fragments typically exhibit millimolar to micromolar affinities, requiring substantial optimization to achieve therapeutic efficacy. Thermodynamic profiling helps identify fragments with enthalpy-driven binding, which often provide better starting points for optimization compared to entropy-driven binders. As fragments are optimized, monitoring the thermodynamic profile helps maintain a balanced contribution of enthalpy and entropy, potentially reducing attrition risks in later development stages [31].

Biologics Engineering

For biologics such as antibodies and nanobodies, thermodynamic profiling guides engineering efforts to improve affinity and stability. In studies of anti-EGF nanobodies, SPR-based thermodynamics revealed distinct binding mechanisms: Nb1 demonstrated strong enthalpy-driven binding with slow dissociation, while Nb6 showed more balanced thermodynamic characteristics [33]. Such insights inform humanization and affinity maturation campaigns by identifying regions where structural modifications may enhance binding through optimized interfacial interactions.

The small size and robust nature of nanobodies make them particularly amenable to thermodynamic analysis, as demonstrated in studies where SPR reliably characterized interactions despite the rapid kinetics typical of these small binding domains [33].

Mixture Analysis and Process Monitoring

Multi-temperature SPR assays enable the analysis of complex mixtures with reduced experimental requirements. By combining temperature variation with mixture injections, researchers can extract individual component parameters from fewer mixtures than traditional approaches. This capability has significant implications for process analytical technology (PAT) in biopharmaceutical manufacturing [17].

For heterogeneous systems like antibody glycoforms, which are difficult to separate physically, multi-temperature analysis facilitates characterization of individual component binding without purification. This approach has been demonstrated with carbonic anhydrase II binders, where conducting experiments at different temperatures reduced the number of necessary mixture injections from N to M (where 2 ≤ M ≤ N) [17].

Technical Considerations and Troubleshooting

Managing Temperature-Dependent Artifacts

Successful implementation of multi-temperature SPR experiments requires careful management of potential temperature-induced artifacts:

Baseline Stability: Temperature changes affect the refractive index of running buffers, potentially causing baseline shifts. To mitigate this, ensure thorough temperature equilibration before data collection and use instrument-specific normalization procedures [10]. Implement reference flow cells with mock-modified surfaces to correct for bulk refractive index changes [30].

Matrix Effects: Variations in temperature can alter the extension of dextran matrices on sensor chips, particularly after regeneration with extreme conditions. These effects are more pronounced at higher ligand densities and can be minimized by matching sample and running buffer composition through dialysis or buffer exchange [10].

Binding Site Integrity: Verify that temperature changes do not alter ligand conformation or binding site accessibility through control experiments with well-characterized binders at each temperature.

Experimental Design Optimization

Temperature Spacing: Uniform temperature spacing in 1/T space (rather than in °C) provides more evenly distributed data points in Van't Hoff plots, improving parameter estimation accuracy.

Replication Strategy: Include replicate measurements at each temperature, particularly for the middle temperatures in the series, as these strongly influence the curvature assessment for ΔCᴘ determination.

Consistency Checks: Perform positive control interactions with known thermodynamic parameters to validate system performance across the temperature range.

Multi-temperature SPR experiments combined with Van't Hoff analysis provide a comprehensive framework for extracting detailed thermodynamic profiles of biomolecular interactions. When implemented with careful attention to experimental design and data analysis, this approach yields insights into the molecular forces driving binding events that extend far beyond affinity measurements alone. Within the context of SPR baseline stability research, understanding and controlling for temperature effects becomes paramount for distinguishing true thermodynamic parameters from experimental artifacts.

The applications in drug discovery—from fragment screening to biologics engineering—demonstrate the practical value of thermodynamic profiling for guiding molecular optimization. As SPR technology continues to advance with improved temperature control and detection sensitivity, multi-temperature approaches will likely play an increasingly important role in understanding molecular recognition and accelerating therapeutic development.

Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) sensors have established themselves as powerful analytical tools for real-time, label-free monitoring of biomolecular interactions, playing increasingly vital roles in pharmaceutical research, medical diagnostics, and environmental monitoring [35] [1] [36]. These sensors function by detecting minute changes in the refractive index (RI) at a metal-dielectric interface, a principle that makes them exceptionally sensitive not only to target analytes but also to environmental temperature fluctuations [16] [37]. The temperature dependence of SPR sensors arises from the thermo-optic effect, which describes how the refractive indices of the metal film, fiber core, and sensing medium all vary with temperature [16]. According to recent studies, the temperature coefficient sensitivity of certain SPR structures can reach values as high as -1020.41 ppm/°C, highlighting the profound impact thermal variations can have on measurement accuracy [16].

This inherent temperature sensitivity presents a significant challenge for SPR applications requiring high precision, particularly in non-laboratory settings where temperature control is suboptimal. For fiber-optic SPR sensors, this problem is exacerbated by the fact that smaller cladding diameters often experience greater temperature influence [37]. Consequently, even minor temperature changes can induce resonance wavelength shifts comparable to or greater than those produced by the target analytes, leading to substantial measurement errors and false positives in critical applications such as drug discovery and clinical diagnostics [38]. The temperature effect manifests not only as a shift in the resonance angle or wavelength but also as a broadening of the SPR spectrum, which further degrades measurement accuracy [16] [39]. These limitations have stimulated extensive research into temperature self-compensating SPR sensor architectures that can distinguish between signals originating from molecular binding events and those arising from thermal fluctuations, thereby significantly improving measurement reliability in real-world applications [37].

Fundamental Mechanisms of Temperature Self-Compensation

Temperature self-compensation in fiber-optic SPR sensors operates on the principle of differential sensing, where multiple sensing channels simultaneously monitor different parameters. The core mechanism involves creating sensor architectures with at least two distinct sensing elements: one primarily sensitive to both the target analyte and temperature, and another sensitive predominantly to temperature alone [37] [40]. Mathematically, this dual-parameter sensing approach can be described using a sensitivity matrix equation:

[ \begin{bmatrix} \Delta T \ \Delta N

\end{bmatrix}

\frac{1}{F} \begin{bmatrix} T{\lambda 1} & T{\lambda 2} \ N{\lambda 1} & N{\lambda 2} \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} \Delta \lambda1 \ \Delta \lambda2 \end{bmatrix} ]

Where ( \Delta T ) and ( \Delta N ) represent changes in temperature and the analyte of interest, respectively; ( \Delta \lambda1 ) and ( \Delta \lambda2 ) denote resonance wavelength shifts from the two sensing channels; ( T{\lambda 1} ), ( T{\lambda 2} ), ( N{\lambda 1} ), and ( N{\lambda 2} ) are the sensitivity coefficients of each channel to temperature and the analyte; and ( F = T{\lambda 1}N{\lambda 2} - N{\lambda 1}T{\lambda 2} ) represents the discrimination factor [37]. When properly designed, this matrix equation allows for the extraction of pure analyte concentration by mathematically eliminating the temperature contribution from the composite signal.

The physical implementation of this principle typically exploits material-based discrimination. For instance, one sensing channel might be functionalized with a temperature-sensitive material such as polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), which exhibits a high thermo-optic coefficient, while the other channel remains uncoated or is coated with a different material that responds primarily to the target analyte [37] [40]. PDMS undergoes significant refractive index changes with temperature, causing substantial shifts in the resonance wavelength of the temperature-sensing channel. Meanwhile, the analyte-sensing channel experiences wavelength shifts due to both temperature changes and binding events. By comparing the responses of both channels, the system can computationally isolate the analyte-specific signal. Alternative approaches utilize structural discrimination, where different fiber geometries or waveguide modes exhibit distinct temperature and analyte sensitivities, enabling similar compensation effects without additional functional materials [41].

Table 1: Key Mechanisms for Temperature Self-Compensation in Fiber-Optic SPR Sensors

Mechanism Type	Operating Principle	Key Characteristics	Typ Applications
Dual-Channel Sensing	Simultaneous measurement via two spatially separated sensing regions	Requires differential functionalization; high compensation accuracy	Chiral drug detection [41], glucose monitoring [40]
Multi-Parameter Interferometry	Combination of SPR with Mach-Zehnder (MZI) or Fabry-Pérot interferometers	Utilizes phase difference measurements; complex fabrication	Anatabine detection [41]
Multi-Modal Resonance	Excitation of multiple resonance modes within same fiber structure	Single-point sensing; minimal cross-talk	Refractive index sensing [37]
Reference-Channel Compensation	Dedicated temperature reference channel with analyte isolation	Direct temperature measurement; simplified signal processing	Salinity detection [37]

Advanced Sensor Architectures and Designs

The implementation of temperature self-compensation strategies has led to the development of several sophisticated fiber-optic SPR sensor architectures, each with distinct advantages for specific application scenarios. These designs can be broadly categorized into single-fiber and hybrid-fiber structures, with further subdivisions based on their specific geometrical configurations and functionalization approaches.

Dual-Channel Cylindrical Structures

Cylindrical structures represent one of the most straightforward approaches to temperature self-compensation, leveraging the natural geometry of standard optical fibers. In these architectures, researchers typically employ a section of single-mode fiber (SMF) or no-core fiber (NCF) with a gold or silver film deposited on the cladding surface. The compensation mechanism is implemented by functionally dividing the metalized surface into distinct regions. For example, in a notable implementation, a 1 cm-long NCF was coated with a gold film, with approximately half of the surface area subsequently coated with PDMS for temperature sensing, while the remaining half was functionalized with specific receptors for glucose detection [37] [40]. This configuration enabled simultaneous measurement of glucose concentration (with a sensitivity of 2.882 nm/%) and temperature, effectively eliminating thermal cross-talk through computational compensation. A similar approach using a 2 cm-long SMF connected to a multimode fiber demonstrated refractive index sensing capabilities with a sensitivity of 2664.540 nm/RIU while maintaining temperature independence [37]. The primary advantage of cylindrical structures lies in their mechanical robustness and relatively simple fabrication process, as they require no complex fiber tapering or polishing, only precise surface functionalization.

Cascaded and U-Shaped Structures

Cascaded fiber structures offer an alternative architectural approach, connecting multiple fiber segments with distinct sensing functionalities in series. These designs typically combine different fiber types, such as single-mode, multi-mode, and no-core fibers, each dedicated to measuring a specific parameter. For instance, a temperature-compensated refractive index sensor demonstrated by Teng et al. utilized a U-shaped plastic optical fiber with gold films deposited on both polished sides, with one gold film surface coated with PDMS [37]. This configuration achieved an impressive refractive index sensitivity of 1258 nm/RIU while effectively compensating for temperature variations. The U-shaped design enhances the interaction between the evanescent field and the sensing medium, thereby improving overall sensitivity. Similarly, Lin et al. implemented a cascaded sensor for simultaneous measurement of temperature and glucose concentration by sequentially connecting fiber segments coated with silver, and others with both gold and PDMS membranes [40]. Although cascaded structures generally offer higher sensitivity and clearer channel separation compared to cylindrical designs, they tend to be more mechanically fragile, particularly at the connection points between different fiber types, and may exhibit higher transmission losses due to multiple interconnections.

Double-Hole Fiber and Specialized Geometries

Recent advances in fiber fabrication technology have enabled the development of more specialized fiber geometries specifically designed for temperature self-compensation. Among these, double-hole fiber (DOF) sensors represent a particularly innovative approach. In one implementation, researchers created a dual-channel SPR-MZI cascaded structure using a single-mode fiber (SMF)-multimode fiber (MMF)-DOF configuration [41]. This design deposited nano-metal films in the dual-hole fiber region to excite the SPR effect, while the UiO-66-NH2 metal-organic framework (MOF) was coated as a chiral recognition carrier. The single-mode optical fibers and dual-hole optical fibers combined to form a Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) that served as a third sensing channel specifically for eliminating temperature interference. This sophisticated architecture achieved remarkable sensitivities of 51.743 pm/nM and 49.512 pm/nM for (R)-(+)-anatabine and (S)-(−)-anatabine detection, respectively, with a minimum detection limit of 0.386 nM [41]. Other specialized geometries include V-shaped fibers, where a homemade eccentric 28 μm quartz fiber is machined into a V-shape to enhance sensitivity through increased evanescent field exposure [37]. While these specialized fibers often deliver superior performance in terms of sensitivity and compensation accuracy, their commercial availability is limited, and they typically require complex fabrication processes, making them more suitable for research applications than widespread commercial deployment.

Table 2: Performance Comparison of Temperature Self-Compensating SPR Sensor Architectures

Architecture	Temperature Sensitivity	Analyte Sensitivity	Minimum Detection Limit	Key Advantages
Dual-Channel NCF	-2.6 nm/°C [40]	2.4 nm/% (glucose) [40]	Not specified	Simple fabrication, high mechanical strength
Cascaded U-Shaped Fiber	Not specified	1258 nm/RIU [37]	Not specified	Enhanced evanescent field interaction, high sensitivity
Double-Hole Fiber (DOF)	Self-compensating [41]	51.743 pm/nM (R-anatabine) [41]	0.386 nM [41]	Multi-parameter detection, exceptional sensitivity for chiral molecules
SMF-MMF-DOF Cascade	Self-compensating [41]	49.512 pm/nM (S-anatabine) [41]	0.386 nM [41]	Integrated SPR-MZI operation, high selectivity
Hollow Fiber with PDMS	Not specified	5200 nm/RIU [37]	Not specified	Internal and external metalization, large sensing area

Critical Materials and Functionalization Strategies

The performance of temperature self-compensating fiber-optic SPR sensors depends critically on the materials used in their construction, particularly the metallic layers, two-dimensional nanomaterials, and temperature-responsive polymers that enable differential sensing capabilities.

Metallic Films and Bimetallic Structures

The choice of metal for SPR excitation fundamentally influences sensor performance. Silver (Ag) and gold (Au) remain the most widely used metals due to their exceptional plasmonic properties. Silver typically provides sharper resonance peaks and higher sensitivity due to its lower imaginary permittivity component, but it suffers from rapid oxidation when exposed to atmospheric conditions [16]. Gold offers superior chemical stability and biocompatibility but exhibits broader resonance peaks due to higher absorption losses [16]. To leverage the advantages of both metals, researchers have developed bimetallic structures, such as an Ag/Au bilayer where a thin gold film is deposited over a silver layer, combining the sharp resonance of silver with the chemical stability of gold [16]. In one Kretschmann-configuration SPR sensor, this bimetallic approach achieved an angular sensitivity of 345.42 deg/RIU, representing a 140% improvement compared to conventional single-metal structures [16]. The thickness of these metal films is carefully optimized, typically ranging from 30-60 nm, to balance between sufficient plasmon excitation strength and acceptable propagation loss [16] [37].

2D Nanomaterials and Heterostructures

Two-dimensional nanomaterials have emerged as crucial components for enhancing SPR sensor performance. Materials such as molybdenum disulfide (MoS₂), graphene, and blue phosphorus (BlueP)-molybdenum disulfide (MoS₂) heterostructures can be applied as overlayers on metal films to significantly boost sensitivity and stability [16] [40]. These materials enhance the electric field confinement at the sensing interface and provide additional functionalization sites for specific molecular recognition. For instance, incorporating MoS₂ in a temperature-compensated no-core fiber SPR sensor resulted in markedly improved sensitivity and the capability to adjust resonance bands into the near-infrared spectrum [40]. Similarly, BlueP/MoS₂ heterostructures have demonstrated exceptional performance in multilayer SPR sensors, contributing to increased field intensity and temperature coefficient sensitivity [16]. Beyond sensitivity enhancement, some 2D materials also offer unique opportunities for specific functionalization—graphene's rich π-electron system facilitates strong interactions with aromatic compounds, while MoS₂ provides defect sites suitable for anchoring various biomolecular recognition elements.

Temperature-Responsive and Functional Materials

Temperature self-compensation specifically requires materials with well-characterized thermo-optic responses. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) has become the material of choice for temperature sensing channels due to its high thermo-optic coefficient (dn/dT ≈ -4.5×10⁻⁴ RIU/°C), transparency in the visible and near-infrared regions, and straightforward processing characteristics [37] [40]. In sensor implementation, PDMS is typically spin-coated onto specific sections of the metalized fiber surface, creating dedicated temperature-sensing regions. For analyte-specific detection, various functional materials are employed, including metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) like UiO-66-NH₂ for chiral recognition [41], semiconductor films such as zinc oxide for refractive index modulation [40], and hydrogel polymers for pH-responsive sensing [37]. These functional materials are carefully selected based on their specific interactions with target analytes, their compatibility with fiber-optic fabrication processes, and their thermal stability over the sensor's operational range.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Temperature Self-Compensating SPR Sensors

Material Category	Specific Examples	Function in Sensor System	Key Characteristics
Plasmonic Metals	Gold (Au), Silver (Ag), Ag/Au bimetallic	SPR excitation layer	Au: Biocompatible, stable; Ag: Sharp resonance; Bimetallic: Balanced performance [16]
2D Nanomaterials	MoS₂, Graphene, BlueP/MoS₂ heterostructure	Sensitivity enhancement, field confinement	High surface area, tunable optoelectronic properties [16] [40]
Thermo-Optic Polymers	Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)	Temperature sensing element	High thermo-optic coefficient, transparent, flexible [37] [40]
Metal-Organic Frameworks	UiO-66-NH₂	Chiral recognition, selective binding	High surface area, tunable porosity, specific molecular recognition [41]
Semiconductor Oxides	Zinc Oxide (ZnO), Titanium Dioxide (TiO₂)	Refractive index modulation, bandwidth control	High refractive index, photocatalytic properties [40]

Experimental Implementation and Methodology

The development and characterization of temperature self-compensating fiber-optic SPR sensors involve a multi-step process encompassing sensor fabrication, experimental setup configuration, and performance validation. Below, we outline a generalized protocol that can be adapted for various sensor architectures.

Sensor Fabrication Protocol

The fabrication process typically begins with fiber preparation. For most architectures, this involves carefully removing a section of the fiber cladding (typically 1-3 cm in length) using chemical etching or mechanical polishing to expose the core for evanescent field interaction [37] [40]. For U-shaped sensors, the fiber is carefully bent and polished on the curved section to create an enhanced sensing region [37]. Following cladding removal, the fiber undergoes thorough cleaning using piranha solution (a mixture of sulfuric acid and hydrogen peroxide) or oxygen plasma treatment to ensure optimal adhesion of subsequent layers.

Metal deposition constitutes the next critical step. Using magnetron sputtering or thermal evaporation systems, a thin adhesion layer (often chromium or titanium, 2-5 nm thick) is first deposited, followed by the primary plasmonic metal layer (gold or silver) with precisely controlled thickness ranging from 30-60 nm [16] [40]. The thickness is meticulously optimized to balance between strong SPR excitation and acceptable propagation loss. For bimetallic structures, this process is repeated for the second metal layer with adjusted thickness parameters.

Following metal deposition, region-specific functionalization is performed. For the temperature-sensing region, PDMS is typically prepared by mixing the base and curing agent in a 10:1 ratio, degassing under vacuum to remove bubbles, then spin-coating onto designated sections of the metalized fiber surface [37] [40]. The PDMS is then cured at 70-80°C for 1-2 hours to achieve cross-linking. For the analyte-sensing region, various functional materials are applied depending on the target application. These may include drop-casting of 2D material dispersions (e.g., MoS₂), layer-by-layer assembly of MOFs, or chemical immobilization of specific biorecognition elements such as antibodies or aptamers using standard covalent coupling chemistry like EDC-NHS activation [41] [40].

Experimental Setup and Characterization

The experimental setup for characterizing temperature self-compensating SPR sensors typically consists of a broadband light source (e.g., halogen lamp or supercontinuum laser), the fabricated sensor element, a temperature-controlled flow cell or chamber, and a high-resolution spectrometer (e.g., Ocean Optics or similar) for spectral analysis [40]. The sensor is mounted in the temperature-controlled environment, which allows precise regulation of temperature using a Peltier element or similar device, typically ranging from 15°C to 45°C to simulate realistic operating conditions. For liquid sensing, a peristaltic or syringe pump is integrated to maintain constant flow rates of analytes during testing.

Characterization begins with temperature calibration, where the transmission spectrum is recorded at various stabilized temperature points without any analyte present. This establishes the baseline temperature response of both sensing channels [40]. Subsequently, analyte sensing characterization is performed by introducing standard solutions of known concentration at fixed temperature points, monitoring the resonance wavelength shifts for both channels simultaneously. For each measurement, the resonance wavelength is determined by identifying the minimum point in the transmission spectrum using centroid or polynomial fitting algorithms.

Data processing employs the sensitivity matrix approach described in Section 2. The resonance wavelength shifts from both channels (( \Delta \lambda1 ) and ( \Delta \lambda2 )) are recorded for each measurement, and the corresponding changes in analyte concentration (( \Delta N )) and temperature (( \Delta T )) are calculated using the predetermined sensitivity coefficients [37]. Validation experiments typically involve comparing sensor responses with and without compensation under identical temperature fluctuation conditions to quantify the improvement in measurement accuracy afforded by the self-compensation architecture.

Applications in Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Research

Temperature self-compensating fiber-optic SPR sensors have found particularly valuable applications in pharmaceutical and biomedical research, where precise measurements under non-laboratory conditions are increasingly required. These advanced sensing architectures address critical challenges in drug discovery, clinical diagnostics, and biomedical research by providing reliable data in environments where temperature fluctuations would otherwise compromise measurement accuracy.

In drug discovery and development, SPR technology has become indispensable for characterizing biomolecular interactions, with applications spanning target validation, lead compound screening, hit-to-lead optimization, and characterization of biologics including biosimilars and monoclonal antibodies [35] [38] [36]. The implementation of temperature compensation is particularly crucial for kinetic studies, where accurate determination of association rate constants (kₐ), dissociation rate constants (kd), and binding affinity (KD) requires exceptional measurement stability over extended periods [38]. For instance, in the characterization of chiral drug enantiomers like (R,S)-anatabine, temperature-compensated double-hole optical fiber SPR sensors have demonstrated the ability to achieve specific recognition with sensitivities of 51.743 pm/nM for (R)-(+)-anatabine and 49.512 pm/nM for (S)-(−)-anatabine, maintaining precision despite thermal variations that would typically obscure such subtle differences between enantiomers [41]. Similarly, in biosimilar development programs, where comprehensive comparability assessments require highly reproducible binding affinity measurements across multiple laboratories with varying environmental conditions, temperature-compensated SPR sensors provide the necessary robustness to generate reliable data for regulatory submissions [38].

In clinical diagnostics and health monitoring, temperature self-compensating SPR sensors enable accurate measurements of biologically relevant analytes in point-of-care settings where precise temperature control is often unavailable. Glucose monitoring represents a prominent application area, with dual-channel NCF SPR sensors demonstrating the capability to simultaneously measure glucose concentration (with sensitivity of 2.4 nm/%) and ambient temperature (with sensitivity of -2.6 nm/°C), then applying calibration formulas to correct for thermal cross-sensitivity [40]. This approach effectively addresses the long-standing challenge of temperature interference in continuous glucose monitoring systems. Beyond glucose, these sensors show promising applications in cancer biomarker detection, pathogen identification, and therapeutic drug monitoring—all scenarios where results are needed rapidly at the point of care rather than in centralized laboratories with strict environmental controls [35] [36]. The miniaturized nature of fiber-optic SPR sensors further enhances their suitability for wearable health monitoring devices and implantable sensors, where temperature compensation becomes absolutely essential due to the substantial and unpredictable thermal variations encountered in these applications.

Future Perspectives and Research Directions

The field of temperature self-compensating fiber-optic SPR sensors continues to evolve rapidly, with several promising research directions emerging that are likely to shape future developments. Current trends indicate movement toward multifunctional sensor arrays capable of simultaneously monitoring multiple parameters beyond just temperature and a single analyte. These advanced systems incorporate additional sensing modalities such as electrochemical detection, Raman spectroscopy, and mass-sensitive measurements to provide complementary information and enhance overall measurement reliability [35]. The integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning for real-time data interpretation represents another significant frontier, with potential applications in predictive modeling of drug-target interactions and automated quality control during pharmaceutical manufacturing [35]. These computational approaches can further refine temperature compensation algorithms by identifying complex, non-linear relationships between environmental parameters and sensor responses that may not be captured by simple linear matrix methods.

Miniaturization and system integration constitute another major research direction, with efforts focused on developing lab-on-a-chip platforms that incorporate temperature-compensated SPR sensing alongside microfluidics, sample preparation, and data processing components [35] [1]. These integrated systems are particularly valuable for point-of-care diagnostics and field-deployable environmental monitoring applications where portability and operational simplicity are essential. Recent advances in manufacturing techniques, including 3D printing of optical components and automated fiber tapering processes, are making these complex sensor architectures more accessible and reproducible [40]. Parallel developments in novel functional materials continue to expand the capabilities of temperature-compensated SPR sensors, with particular interest in metamaterials with negative refractive indices, phase-change materials with tunable optical properties, and stimuli-responsive hydrogels that undergo predictable structural transformations in response to specific analytes or temperature changes [16] [1]. These advanced materials offer opportunities for creating sensors with dynamically adjustable properties, potentially enabling real-time optimization of sensing parameters for different operational conditions or target analytes.

As these technological advances mature, temperature self-compensating fiber-optic SPR sensors are poised to make significant impacts across diverse fields including personalized medicine through continuous therapeutic drug monitoring, industrial bioprocessing via real-time quality assessment, and environmental protection through distributed networks of field-deployable sensors [35] [1]. The ongoing convergence of materials science, photonics, and data analytics promises to further enhance the performance, reliability, and accessibility of these sophisticated sensing platforms, ultimately expanding their applications beyond traditional laboratory settings into real-world environments where robust, temperature-independent measurements are essential.

Diagnosing and Correcting Temperature-Induced Baseline and Signal Artifacts

Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) has become an indispensable tool in biochemical research and drug development for its ability to monitor biomolecular interactions in real-time without labeling. The sensorgram, which plots the SPR response against time, provides rich information including kinetic parameters (association rate k_on, dissociation rate k_off), affinity constants (K_D), and concentration data [42]. However, the quality of this data is fundamentally dependent on the stability of the baseline, defined as the signal in the absence of analyte when only running buffer is flowing over the sensor surface [43].

Within the context of research on temperature effects on SPR baseline stability, this guide addresses the critical challenge of unstable baselines and noisy sensorgrams. Temperature fluctuations can induce significant drift and noise through various physical mechanisms, including changes in buffer refractive index, altered binding kinetics, and modified surface characteristics [7]. Even minor baseline disturbances can compromise the accuracy of kinetic fitting, leading to erroneous scientific conclusions and potentially costly decisions in drug development pipelines. This guide provides a systematic approach to diagnosing, troubleshooting, and preventing these issues, with particular emphasis on temperature-related instabilities.

A stable, flat baseline is the foundation of any reliable SPR experiment. Before engaging in troubleshooting, it is essential to properly recognize and categorize the different types of disturbances that can occur.

Characterizing Common Sensorgram Disturbances

• Baseline Drift: A gradual, continuous upward or downward movement of the baseline signal, often caused by inadequate system equilibration, temperature fluctuations, or slow surface changes [18].
• Excessive Noise: Random fluctuations of the signal significantly above the instrument's typical noise floor, potentially stemming from electrical interference, vibrations, or particulate matter in the buffer [43].
• Spikes: Abrupt, short-lived deviations in the signal frequently caused by microscopic air bubbles passing through the flow cell or particulate matter [44].
• Bulk Effects: Sharp signal shifts at injection start and end points due to refractive index differences between the running buffer and sample buffer [44].

The Temperature-Baseline Stability Relationship

Temperature directly impacts SPR baseline stability through multiple physical mechanisms. First, the refractive index of both the buffer and the sensor chip materials is temperature-dependent, meaning any temperature fluctuation creates a direct signal change. Second, temperature affects biochemical interaction kinetics and surface properties, which can alter baseline stability [7]. Research has demonstrated that performing SPR experiments at lower temperatures (e.g., 10°C) can sometimes yield cleaner data with better fit to kinetic models, highlighting the critical relationship between temperature control and data quality [7].

Systematic Diagnostic Approach: From Symptom to Source

Implementing a structured diagnostic workflow is crucial for efficiently identifying the root cause of baseline issues. The following diagram provides a logical pathway for troubleshooting:

Diagnostic Tables for Common Issues

Table 1: Symptom-Based Diagnosis of Common Baseline Problems

Symptom Pattern	Most Likely Causes	Secondary Causes	Diagnostic Tests
Slow, continuous drift	Temperature fluctuations [7], Incomplete surface equilibration [18], Buffer mismatch [44]	Slow surface deterioration, Flow rate instability	Monitor baseline with different buffer batches, Check temperature stability
High-frequency noise	Electrical interference, Vibration [43], Particulate contamination	Detector issues, Light source instability	Check instrument grounding, Inspect buffer for particles
Random spikes	Microbubbles [44] [18], Particulate matter	Injection artifacts, Surface defects	Degas buffer thoroughly, Filter samples
Signal "waviness"	System needs cleaning [44], Pump stroke fluctuations	Buffer contamination, Air in fluidic system	Run cleaning procedure, Prime system extensively

Table 2: Temperature-Specific Effects on SPR Baseline

Temperature Condition	Observed Effect	Underlying Mechanism	Corrective Actions
Fluctuating temperature	Baseline drift	Refractive index changes with temperature [7]	Improve temperature control, Allow longer equilibration
High temperature (>25°C)	Increased bubble formation	Reduced gas solubility in buffer [18]	Thorough buffer degassing, Use degassing module
Low temperature (10°C)	Improved fitting quality	Slowed kinetics, reduced complex artifacts [7]	Consider lower temperature experiments for challenging interactions
Temperature gradients	Local refractive index variations	Convection currents, uneven heating	Verify instrument calibration, Ensure proper thermal equilibration

Experimental Protocols for Resolution and Prevention

Comprehensive Buffer Preparation Protocol

Proper buffer preparation is the most critical factor in minimizing baseline issues. Follow this detailed protocol for optimal results:

• Fresh Buffer Preparation: Prepare running buffer fresh daily using high-purity water and reagents. Never add fresh buffer to old stock, as this can introduce contaminants and promote microbial growth [18].

• Filtration: Filter the buffer through a 0.22 µm membrane filter to remove particulate matter that could cause spikes or block the microfluidic system [18].

• Degassing: Degas the buffer thoroughly using one of these methods:

  • Vacuum degassing: Apply vacuum with stirring for 15-20 minutes
  • Sparge degassing: Bubble inert gas (helium) through the buffer
  • Online degassing: Use the instrument's built-in degasser if available Proper degassing is crucial as bubbles are a common cause of spikes and noise [43] [18].

• Detergent Addition (if appropriate): After filtering and degassing, add detergents such as Tween-20 (typically 0.005-0.01%) to reduce non-specific binding and improve baseline stability. Adding detergents after degassing prevents foam formation [18].

Systematic Surface Equilibration Procedure

A properly equilibrated sensor surface is essential for baseline stability, particularly after docking a new chip or immobilizing ligand:

• After docking the chip or completing immobilization, prime the system with running buffer
• Set a continuous flow of running buffer at the experimental flow rate
• Monitor the baseline for a minimum of 30 minutes, or until drift reduces to acceptable levels (<1-2 RU/min)
• For particularly problematic surfaces, extended equilibration overnight may be necessary [18]
• Perform at least three "start-up cycles" with buffer injections (mimicking sample injection conditions but without analyte) to further stabilize the system before beginning actual experiments [18]

Temperature Optimization Methodology

Based on research into temperature effects on SPR baseline stability, the following protocol helps optimize experimental temperature:

• Initial Assessment: Run preliminary experiments at different temperatures (e.g., 10°C, 25°C, 37°C) to assess baseline stability and data quality at each temperature [7].

• Kinetic Considerations: For interactions with challenging kinetics or significant artifacts at higher temperatures, consider performing detailed kinetic experiments at lower temperatures (e.g., 10°C), which may provide better fit to simple interaction models [7].

• Temperature Equilibration: After changing temperature, allow sufficient time for complete system equilibration (typically 1-2 hours for large temperature changes).

• Consistency Maintenance: Once optimal temperature is identified, maintain consistent temperature control throughout all comparative experiments.

Advanced Data Processing: Dynamic Baseline Algorithm

For post-acquisition correction of residual baseline issues, implement a dynamic baseline algorithm:

• Principle: This mathematical approach adjusts the baseline dynamically according to a pre-defined ratio between areas of the SPR curve below and above the baseline, compensating for fluctuations in input optical power and background signal [45].

• Implementation: The algorithm can be expressed mathematically as keeping constant the ratio R = A1/A2, where A1 is the area of the SPR curve below the baseline and A2 is the area above the baseline [45].

• Application: This method can be combined with traditional data analysis approaches (centroid method, polynomial fitting) to improve robustness against light source noise and drift [45].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Key Research Reagents and Materials for SPR Baseline Stabilization

Reagent/Material	Function	Application Notes	Effectiveness Rating
High-purity water	Buffer preparation	Use HPLC-grade or better to minimize contaminants	Critical
0.22 µm membrane filters	Particulate removal	Filter all buffers and samples immediately before use	High
Degassing module	Bubble prevention	Integrated or external systems to remove dissolved gases	High
Detergents (Tween-20)	Reduce non-specific binding	Add after degassing to prevent foaming; typical concentration: 0.005-0.01%	Medium-High
Blocking agents (BSA, casein, ethanolamine)	Surface blocking	Reduce non-specific binding after immobilization	Medium-High
CM5 sensor chips	Versatile immobilization	Carboxymethylated dextran surface for covalent coupling	High
NTA sensor chips	His-tagged protein capture	Oriented immobilization of His-tagged ligands	High
Regeneration solutions (glycine pH 2, NaCl)	Surface regeneration	Remove bound analyte without damaging immobilized ligand	Medium

Achieving stable baselines and clean sensorgrams in SPR requires a systematic, multifaceted approach that addresses buffer preparation, surface handling, temperature control, and experimental design. The temperature-baseline stability relationship is particularly significant, as temperature fluctuations can induce drift through both physical (refractive index) and biochemical (interaction kinetics) pathways. By implementing the protocols and troubleshooting strategies outlined in this guide, researchers can significantly improve data quality, leading to more reliable kinetic parameters and better-informed scientific conclusions. Particularly for critical applications in drug development, where decisions are based on accurate affinity measurements, investing time in optimizing baseline stability returns substantial benefits in data credibility and reproducibility.

Optimizing Flow Rate, Stabilization Time, and Buffer Composition to Minimize Thermal Noise

Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) biosensors have established themselves as indispensable tools in drug development and molecular interaction studies due to their capabilities for real-time, label-free detection. However, the exceptional sensitivity of these instruments to minute refractive index changes also renders them highly susceptible to thermal noise, a pervasive challenge that can compromise data integrity by causing baseline drift and reducing signal-to-noise ratio. Temperature fluctuations as small as 0.01 °C can induce significant refractive index shifts, mimicking binding events or obscuring true kinetic data. This technical guide addresses the critical optimization of three fundamental experimental parameters—flow rate, stabilization time, and buffer composition—to mitigate thermal noise. Framed within broader research on temperature effects on SPR baseline stability, this document provides researchers and drug development professionals with detailed, actionable protocols to enhance measurement precision and reliability, thereby supporting robust thermodynamic and kinetic characterization in pharmaceutical applications.

Theoretical Foundations of Thermal Noise in SPR

The performance of SPR biosensors is intrinsically linked to temperature due to the thermo-optic effect, where the refractive indices of all materials within the sensor structure—including the metal film, dielectric layers, and the analyte buffer—exhibit temperature dependence. The temperature coefficient of sensitivity, which can reach values as high as -1020.41 ppm/°C, quantifies this relationship [16]. In the Kretschmann configuration, the resonance condition is governed by the momentum matching between the incident photon and the surface plasmon wave. Any temperature-induced change in the refractive index of the sensing medium or the prism (Δn/ΔT) alters the propagation constant of the surface plasmon polariton, leading to a shift in the resonance angle or wavelength that is indistinguishable from a true binding signal [16] [1]. This effect is compounded by thermal expansion of mechanical components and localized heating from the light source, making thermal management a multi-faceted problem. For G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) studies and other membrane protein analyses where maintaining native conformation is critical, uncontrolled temperature fluctuations not only introduce noise but can also destabilize the target, leading to artifactual results [9]. A deep understanding of these principles is essential for developing effective noise mitigation strategies.

Optimization of Flow Rate

Flow rate control within the microfluidic system is a critical operational parameter for managing convective heat transfer and ensuring a stable thermal environment at the sensor surface. An optimized flow rate facilitates efficient heat exchange, minimizing temperature gradients between the injected analyte and the sensor chip.

Quantitative Flow Rate Guidelines

Table 1: Recommended Flow Rates for Thermal Stability in SPR

Application Context	Recommended Flow Rate (μL/min)	Rationale & Thermal Impact
System Equilibration & Baseline Stabilization	10 - 30 [17]	Low flow minimizes initial thermal shock from buffer introduction, allowing system to reach thermal equilibrium.
Standard Binding/Kinetic Assays	30 - 100 [17] [9]	Balances adequate mass transport with sufficient heat exchange to stabilize the local temperature at the sensor surface.
High-Throughput Screening	50 - 100	Faster flows enhance mixing consistency and reduce inter-cycle thermal carryover, improving data uniformity.
Critical Low-Affinity / Fast Kinetics	≥ 70 [17]	High flow minimizes mass transport limitation, but requires meticulous thermostatting to counter cooling effects from fluid flow.

Experimental Protocol for Flow Rate Calibration

• System Preparation: Equilibrate the SPR instrument and autosampler at the target experimental temperature (e.g., 25°C) for a minimum of 2 hours before initiation.
• Buffer Loading: Prime the entire fluidic path with the running buffer to be used in the experiment, ensuring no air bubbles are present.
• Baseline Acquisition: Set a preliminary flow rate of 30 μL/min. Monitor the baseline signal until the drift rate falls below 0.5 RU per minute [17].
• Flow Rate Titration: Sequentially inject a small volume (e.g., 10 μL) of a standardized solution (e.g., 100 mM NaCl) at different flow rates (e.g., 10, 30, 50, 70, 100 μL/min). Allow sufficient time for the baseline to re-stabilize between injections.
• Signal Analysis: For each flow rate, record the peak response and the shape of the sensorgram. The optimal flow rate for thermal stability is identified by the condition that yields the most stable pre-injection baseline, the most reproducible response for the standardized injection, and the quickest return to baseline post-injection.
• Validation: Validate the chosen flow rate by running a known control interaction in triplicate. The reported equilibrium constants (KD) should be consistent across replicates.

Optimization of Stabilization Time

Adequate thermal stabilization time is non-negotiable for obtaining a flat baseline, as the SPR system requires time to dissipate thermal gradients after any perturbation, such as a temperature change or the introduction of a new solution.

Multi-Temperature Experimental Framework

For experiments conducted at multiple temperatures—essential for extracting thermodynamic parameters like enthalpy (ΔH) and entropy (ΔS)—a rigorous stabilization protocol is paramount. The relationship between temperature and kinetic parameters is described by the Eyring and Van't Hoff equations, which can be leveraged to reduce the number of required experimental mixtures [17].

Table 2: Stabilization Protocol for Multi-Temperature SPR Experiments

Experimental Phase	Minimum Stabilization Time	Monitoring Criteria to Proceed
Initial System Start-up	2 - 4 hours	The instrument's internal temperature readout is stable within ±0.1°C of the set point.
After Temperature Setpoint Change	30 - 60 minutes per 1°C change	The raw baseline signal drift is less than 1 RU/minute over a 5-minute period.
Post-Buffer Switching / Solvent Correction	15 - 30 minutes	The bulk refractive index shift has stabilized, and the baseline drift returns to the pre-switch level.
Between Analytic Injections in a Cycle	Sufficient to return to stable baseline	Consistent baseline level is achieved before each analyte injection.

Protocol for Baseline Stability Assessment

• Temperature Conditioning: After setting the desired temperature, initiate a continuous flow of buffer at the predetermined optimal flow rate.
• Data Collection: Record the baseline signal in the analyte flow cell for a minimum of 15 minutes without any injections.
• Drift Calculation: Calculate the baseline drift in RU per minute over this monitoring period. Advanced phase-sensitive SPR systems require extreme stability, with resolutions as fine as 1.51 × 10⁻⁶ RIU, which corresponds to sub-RU level shifts [46].
• Iteration: If the drift exceeds the acceptable threshold (e.g., > 1 RU/min for standard kinetic work, or a lower threshold for high-resolution studies), continue stabilization and re-measure until the criterion is met.

The diagram below illustrates the logical decision process for achieving thermal stabilization before data collection.

Optimization of Buffer Composition

The chemical composition of the running buffer directly influences its thermo-optic coefficient (dn/dT), which dictates how much the refractive index changes with temperature. Careful buffer formulation is therefore a powerful strategy to reduce thermal noise.

Thermo-Optic Properties of Common Solvents

Table 3: Thermo-Optic Coefficients (dn/dT) of Common Buffer Components

Buffer Component	Typical dn/dT (RIU/°C)	Application Notes & Recommendations
Water	~ -1.0 × 10⁻⁴ [16]	High negative coefficient; small temperature changes cause significant RI shifts. Use as a high-purity baseline.
Ethanol / Water Mixtures	Higher negative values than water [16]	Can be used to amplify temperature sensitivity deliberately in specialized sensors, but generally avoided for standard assays to reduce noise.
Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS)	~ -1.0 × 10⁻⁴ (dominated by water)	Standard buffer; ensure consistent salt concentration to avoid refractive index changes from evaporation.
HEPES Buffer	~ -1.0 × 10⁻⁴ (dominated by water)	Good for biological systems; pre-equilibrate to experiment temperature before use.
Glycerol (5-10% v/v)	Can reduce the magnitude of dn/dT	Additive that can dampen thermo-optic response but increases viscosity, affecting kinetics. Use with caution.

Protocol for Buffer Preparation and Degassing

• Consistent Formulation: Prepare all running buffers, sample diluents, and regeneration solutions from the same master stock of concentrated buffer and high-purity water (e.g., 18.2 MΩ·cm) to ensure identical ionic strength and composition.
• Degassing: Degas all buffers by applying a vacuum or using an ultrasonic bath for 15-20 minutes immediately before loading into the instrument. This step removes dissolved air, the formation of which within the microfluidics (cavitation) creates local temperature and refractive index fluctuations.
• Thermal Pre-equilibration: Store all buffer solutions inside the instrument's temperature-controlled compartment or in an incubator set to the experimental temperature for at least several hours before the run. This prevents thermal shock when the buffer is drawn into the fluidic path.
• Solvent Correction Calibration: For experiments involving organic solvents (e.g., DMSO), which often have very different dn/dT values, perform a detailed solvent correction calibration curve at the exact experimental temperature to correct for thermal artifacts [17].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 4: Key Reagent Solutions for Thermal Noise Minimization

Reagent / Material	Function & Role in Thermal Stability
High-Purity Water (18.2 MΩ·cm)	Baseline solvent; minimizes particulate and ionic contaminants that can cause non-specific binding and local RI fluctuations.
Carbonic Anhydrase II (CAII) & Inhibitors	Well-characterized model interaction system (e.g., CBS, BDS) for validating system performance and thermal stability across temperatures [17].
Stable, High-Affinity Antibody-Antigen Pair	A reliable positive control (e.g., IgG/anti-IgG) for assessing baseline noise levels and data quality under optimized conditions [46].
Degassing Unit (Ultrasonic Bath or In-line Degasser)	Critical for removing dissolved gasses from buffers to prevent bubble formation, a major source of thermal and refractive index noise in the flow cell.
Precision Temperature Calibrator	Independent device for verifying the accuracy of the instrument's internal temperature sensor, which is crucial for reliable multi-temperature studies.

Integrated Experimental Workflow

The following workflow integrates the optimization of flow rate, stabilization time, and buffer composition into a single, coherent experimental procedure for a robust SPR assay.

Advanced Data Processing for Noise Reduction

Even with meticulous experimental optimization, some residual noise is inevitable. Employing advanced computational smoothing techniques post-acquisition can further enhance data quality. The following algorithms are particularly effective for SPR data [47]:

• Savitzky-Golay Filter: This polynomial smoothing filter is excellent for preserving the lineshape and features of the sensorgram, including the sharp onset and offset of injection phases, while reducing high-frequency noise.
• Exponentially Weighted Moving Average (EWMA): This filter assigns exponentially decreasing weights to older data points, making it responsive to recent changes and suitable for real-time smoothing applications.
• Gaussian Filter: Effective for suppressing high-frequency noise, though it may cause more signal broadening compared to Savitzky-Golay.
• Smoothing Splines: Provides a flexible fit to the data by minimizing a combination of residual error and smoothness, which can be ideal for complex sensorgrams.

These methods are integral to modern SPR analysis, forming a final layer of defense against thermal and instrumental noise to ensure accurate determination of kinetic and thermodynamic parameters [47].

The relentless pursuit of accuracy in Surface Plasmon Resonance biosensing demands a systematic and rigorous approach to mitigating thermal noise. As detailed in this guide, the synergistic optimization of flow rate, stabilization time, and buffer composition establishes a robust experimental foundation that directly addresses the core challenge of temperature-induced baseline instability. By adhering to the prescribed protocols for parameter calibration, employing high-fidelity reagents from the Scientist's Toolkit, and leveraging advanced computational smoothing, researchers can significantly enhance data quality. This comprehensive strategy not only improves the reliability of individual binding assays but also unlocks the full potential of SPR for sophisticated applications, such as the precise thermodynamic profiling of interactions critical to drug development. Ultimately, mastering these optimizations transforms thermal management from a persistent challenge into a controllable variable, paving the way for more reproducible and impactful scientific discoveries.

Addressing Mass Transport Limitations and Non-Specific Binding Exacerbated by Temperature

In Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) biosensing, temperature is a fundamental experimental variable that profoundly influences data quality and interpretation. Its impact extends beyond the well-understood thermodynamic effects on binding affinity to directly exacerbate two of the most challenging artifacts in SPR measurements: mass transport limitations and non-specific binding. These phenomena can significantly compromise kinetic analysis, leading to inaccurate determination of binding constants and misinterpretation of molecular interactions. Within the broader context of SPR baseline stability research, understanding and controlling temperature-dependent effects becomes paramount for developing robust assays, particularly in pharmaceutical applications where precise kinetic characterization dictates drug candidate selection. This technical guide examines the mechanisms through which temperature influences these artifacts and provides detailed methodologies for their identification and mitigation, enabling researchers to acquire thermodynamically sound and kinetically accurate data.

Theoretical Background: Temperature Effects on Molecular Interactions and SPR Measurement

Fundamental Temperature Dependencies in SPR Systems

The influence of temperature on SPR biosensing operates through multiple parallel mechanisms affecting both the molecular interactions under investigation and the physical measurement system itself. Firstly, temperature directly governs the refractive index of liquids within the microfluidic path and at the sensor surface; even minor temperature fluctuations can induce baseline drift that complicates data interpretation [10]. More significantly, the kinetic rates and equilibrium constants of biomolecular interactions exhibit intrinsic temperature dependence, as described by the Arrhenius and Van't Hoff equations, which relate temperature to activation energies and binding thermodynamics [7] [17].

From a physicochemical perspective, elevated temperatures typically accelerate molecular diffusion rates while simultaneously increasing the probability of non-cognitive molecular collisions with the sensor surface. This dual effect creates a challenging trade-off: higher temperatures may alleviate mass transport limitations by enhancing analyte delivery to the surface, but simultaneously intensify non-specific binding through increased thermal energy that promotes hydrophobic interactions and transient contacts with surface functionalities [48]. The net effect on data quality depends critically on which of these competing factors becomes dominant under specific experimental conditions, necessitating careful optimization for each novel interaction system.

Temperature Interplay with Mass Transport and Binding Phenomena

Table 1: Temperature Effects on Key SPR Artifacts and Their Detection Signatures

Artifact Type	Effect of Temperature Increase	Characteristic Sensorgram Features	Primary Impact on Data
Mass Transport Limitations	Diffusivity increases (potentially reducing limitations); binding rate may increase faster than diffusion	Lack of concentration dependence in association phase; square-shaped binding curves; poor fit to 1:1 model	Overestimation of association rate; underestimation of affinity
Non-Specific Binding	Typically increases due to enhanced hydrophobic interactions and molecular mobility	Rapid initial binding followed by slow continuous signal increase; incomplete dissociation; high residual response	False positive signals; inaccurate kinetic parameters; reduced sensitivity
Specific Binding Kinetics	Accelerates association and dissociation according to Arrhenius equation	Changes in curvature in association and dissociation phases; temperature-dependent affinity	Fundamental thermodynamic parameters accessible through Van't Hoff analysis

The complex interplay between temperature, mass transport, and binding creates distinctive experimental signatures. Research demonstrates that performing SPR experiments at lower temperatures (e.g., 10°C) can significantly improve data quality by reducing kinetic rates to better match the temporal resolution of SPR instruments, thereby enabling more accurate fitting to Langmuir binding models [7]. This approach effectively "decouples" mass transport effects from intrinsic binding kinetics, as the reduced binding rates at lower temperatures become less dependent on analyte flux to the surface. Consequently, the strategic selection of experimental temperature serves as a powerful tool for dissecting these intertwined phenomena and obtaining biologically relevant kinetic parameters.

Mass Transport Limitations: Mechanisms and Temperature Exacerbation

Fundamental Principles and Identification

Mass transport limitation (MTL) occurs when the rate of analyte delivery to the sensor surface via diffusion becomes slower than the intrinsic interaction kinetics between the immobilized ligand and soluble analyte. Under such conditions, the observed binding rates reflect diffusion processes rather than the molecular interaction of interest, leading to significant errors in kinetic parameter estimation [49]. The temperature dependence of MTL arises from two competing factors: elevated temperatures increase analyte diffusivity (potentially alleviating MTL) while simultaneously accelerating binding kinetics (potentially exacerbating MTL). In practice, the kinetic acceleration often dominates, making MTL more pronounced at higher temperatures.

Characteristic sensorgram features indicating MTL include: (1) association phases that lack the characteristic curvature of exponential approach to equilibrium, instead appearing nearly linear; (2) square-shaped binding curves with sharp transitions between association and dissociation phases; (3) inconsistent apparent association rate constants (kₒₙ) across different analyte concentrations; and (4) poor fitting to standard 1:1 interaction models with systematic residuals, particularly at the beginning of association and dissociation phases [7]. These features become increasingly prominent at higher temperatures where binding kinetics accelerate.

Experimental Approaches to Address Temperature-Exacerbated MTL

Table 2: Strategies to Mitigate Mass Transport Limitations in SPR

Strategy Category	Specific Techniques	Temperature Considerations	Experimental Example
Surface Engineering	Low ligand density (<50 RU); oriented immobilization; coiled-coil capture systems	Lower temperatures maintain surface stability; reduce binding rates to match diffusion	Coiled-coil mediated tethering with ~60 RU ACE2 capture at 10°C [7]
Flow Rate Optimization	High flow rates (≥50 μL/min); increased injection volumes	Higher flow rates more critical at elevated temperatures where kinetics are faster	Flow rate of 50 μL/min with low surface density to minimize MTL [7]
Temperature Modulation	Lower experimental temperatures (e.g., 10°C); multi-temperature analysis	Reduces binding rates disproportionately to diffusion, improving kinetic resolution	10°C experiments enabling proper fit to 1:1 model for RBD-ACE2 interactions [7]
Data Analysis	Inclusion of mass transport term in fitting models; steady-state affinity analysis	Van't Hoff analysis across temperatures (10°C, 25°C, 37°C) validates parameters	Combined kinetic and steady-state analysis at multiple temperatures [7]

Implementing a coiled-coil mediated capture system represents an advanced approach to minimizing MTL. This methodology, as demonstrated in SARS-CoV-2 RBD and ACE2 interaction studies, involves covalently immobilizing a K5 coil peptide onto the biosensor surface, then capturing an ACE2 receptor with a C-terminal E5 coil tag. This strategy ensures consistent, oriented presentation of the ligand with minimal surface density (~60 response units), dramatically reducing mass transport effects even for high-affinity interactions. When combined with low-temperature measurements (10°C) and high flow rates (50 μL/min), this approach enables accurate kinetic analysis where traditional immobilization methods fail [7].

For quantitative assessment of MTL, the mass transport coefficient (kₜ) can be estimated and compared to the observed association rate (kₒₙₛ). If kₜ << kₒₙₛ * Rmax, significant MTL is present. Temperature reduction effectively addresses this imbalance by decreasing kₒₙₛ more substantially than kₜ, thereby restoring the proper relationship between diffusion and binding processes.

Non-Specific Binding: Challenges Amplified by Temperature

Origins and Temperature-Enhanced Mechanisms

Non-specific binding (NSB) in SPR refers to the adsorption of analytes or matrix components to the sensor surface through interactions other than the specific biological recognition under investigation. This phenomenon encompasses hydrophobic interactions, electrostatic attractions, and other non-cognitive molecular contacts that collectively contribute to background signal, reduce assay sensitivity, and complicate data interpretation [48]. The detrimental impact of NSB escalates with increasing temperature due to enhanced molecular diffusion and the strengthening of hydrophobic interactions, which typically exhibit positive temperature dependence as water molecules become increasingly excluded from non-polar interfaces.

Temperature elevation affects NSB through multiple mechanisms: (1) increased kinetic energy promotes more frequent collisions between analytes and the sensor surface; (2) enhanced diffusion rates accelerate the arrival of potential non-specific binders at the surface; (3) strengthening of entropy-driven hydrophobic interactions as ordered water molecules are released from non-polar surfaces; and (4) potential temperature-induced conformational changes that expose previously buried hydrophobic patches on proteins [48]. These factors collectively establish temperature control as a critical parameter in managing NSB, particularly for complex biological samples containing diverse proteins and macromolecules.

Comprehensive NSB Reduction Strategies

Effective management of NSB requires a multi-faceted approach addressing both surface chemistry and experimental conditions:

Surface Chemistry Optimization: Selection of appropriate sensor chip chemistry represents the first line of defense against NSB. For protein interactions, carboxymethylated dextran surfaces (e.g., CM5 chips) provide a hydrophilic environment that resists non-specific adsorption. Additional surface blocking with inert proteins (BSA or casein) or small molecules (ethanolamine) saturates remaining reactive sites after ligand immobilization [49]. For particularly challenging samples, specialized surfaces with minimal hydrophobicity (e.g., C1 chips) or pre-incorporated blocking functionalities may be necessary.

Buffer Composition and Additives: The strategic formulation of running buffers significantly impacts NSB. Incorporating low concentrations of non-ionic detergents (e.g., 0.005-0.01% Tween-20) competes with hydrophobic interactions without disrupting specific binding. Similarly, moderate ionic strength (50-150 mM NaCl) screens electrostatic attractions while maintaining biological activity. For some systems, inclusion of carboxymethyl dextran or other charged polymers creates an electrostatic barrier to non-specific adsorption [48] [49].

Temperature and Flow Control: While temperature reduction can mitigate NSB, this approach must be balanced against potential exacerbation of mass transport limitations. A recommended strategy employs moderate temperatures (15-20°C) that simultaneously limit NSB while maintaining practical kinetic rates. Combined with optimized flow rates (typically 30-50 μL/min) that balance efficient analyte delivery with adequate contact time, this approach maximizes specific signal-to-noise ratios [7] [49].

Integrated Experimental Protocols for Temperature-Optimized SPR Analysis

Multi-Temperature Kinetic Characterization Protocol

Comprehensive kinetic characterization across multiple temperatures provides both robust kinetic parameters and valuable thermodynamic insights while simultaneously enabling identification of temperature-exacerbated artifacts. The following protocol outlines a systematic approach:

Step 1: Preliminary Temperature Screening

• Immobilize ligand at low density (≤100 RU) using oriented capture methods where possible
• Perform single-cycle kinetics with a representative analyte concentration at temperatures spanning 10-37°C (e.g., 10°C, 15°C, 20°C, 25°C, 30°C, 37°C)
• Identify temperature ranges where binding curves exhibit characteristic 1:1 binding shapes without significant MTL or NSB signatures
• Select at least three temperatures for detailed analysis (typically including one lower temperature: 10-15°C)

Step 2: Multi-Temperature Kinetic Measurements

• For each selected temperature, inject a concentration series spanning 0.1-10 × expected KD
• Maintain constant flow rate (≥30 μL/min) across all temperatures to standardize hydrodynamics
• Include duplicate injections and regular buffer blanks for double-referencing
• Allow sufficient dissociation time (typically 3-5 × 1/kₒff) to accurately determine dissociation rates
• For reversible interactions, avoid surface regeneration between temperatures to maintain consistent surface properties

Step 3: Data Analysis and Validation

• Fit sensorgrams globally to appropriate binding models (start with 1:1 Langmuir)
• Carefully examine residuals for systematic deviations indicating artifacts
• Calculate equilibrium constants (KD) from both kinetic (kₒff/kₒₙ) and steady-state analyses
• Perform Van't Hoff analysis by plotting ln(KA) versus 1/T (where KA = 1/KD) to determine enthalpy (ΔH°) and entropy (ΔS°) changes [7]

This multi-temperature approach enables researchers to identify conditions where artifacts are minimized while simultaneously extracting thermodynamic parameters that provide additional insights into binding mechanisms.

Temperature-Specific Troubleshooting Protocol

When artifacts persist despite temperature optimization, systematic troubleshooting is required:

Addressing Persistent Mass Transport Limitations:

• Further reduce ligand density (target 20-50 RU)
• Increase flow rate to 50-100 μL/min during analyte injection
• Consider alternative surface architectures with improved mass transport characteristics
• Incorporate a mass transport term in the kinetic fitting model
• Validate by comparing results across multiple flow rates

Managing Stubborn Non-Specific Binding:

• Implement more aggressive blocking protocols (sequential BSA and casein treatments)
• Introduce competing surfactants in running buffer (Tween-20, CHAPS)
• Modify buffer pH and ionic strength to alter electrostatic contributions to NSB
• Evaluate alternative sensor chips with different surface properties
• Include control surfaces without ligand to quantify and subtract NSB contributions

Correcting Temperature-Induced Baseline Instability:

• Ensure thorough temperature equilibration (>30 minutes) after changing temperatures
• Implement more frequent buffer blanks to track and correct baseline drift
• Verify buffer matching between sample and running buffers
• Check for temperature-dependent matrix effects or buffer degradation

The Researcher's Toolkit: Essential Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Key Research Reagents and Materials for Temperature-Optimized SPR

Category	Specific Items	Function/Purpose	Temperature Considerations
Sensor Chips	CM5 (carboxymethylated dextran); C1 (minimal matrix); NTA (His-tag capture); SA (streptavidin)	Provide functionalized surfaces for ligand immobilization with varying properties	All chips compatible with temperature-controlled systems; dextran matrices may exhibit slight temperature-dependent swelling
Immobilization Reagents	EDC/NHS chemistry; amine coupling kits; PDEA (thiol coupling)	Covalent attachment of ligands to sensor surfaces	Coupling efficiency may decrease slightly at lower temperatures; requires longer activation times
Blocking Agents	Ethanolamine (1M, pH 8.5); BSA (0.1-1 mg/mL); casein (0.1-1 mg/mL)	Saturate remaining reactive sites after immobilization to reduce NSB	Blocking efficiency improves at moderate temperatures (20-25°C); verify stability at working temperature
Buffer Additives	Tween-20 (0.005-0.01%); CHAPS; carboxymethyl dextran	Reduce non-specific binding through various mechanisms	Surfactant effectiveness may be temperature-dependent; optimize concentration for each temperature
Regeneration Solutions	Glycine-HCl (pH 1.5-3.0); NaOH (10-100 mM); SDS (0.01-0.1%)	Remove bound analyte while maintaining ligand activity	Regeneration efficiency often improves at elevated temperatures; limit exposure time to preserve ligand
Reference Standards	Well-characterized model systems (e.g., antibody-antigen, RBD-ACE2)	Validate instrument performance and experimental protocols	Establish temperature-specific reference values for quality control

Data Analysis and Interpretation Framework

Kinetic and Thermodynamic Analysis

The simultaneous acquisition of kinetic data at multiple temperatures enables comprehensive characterization of molecular interactions through both kinetic and thermodynamic frameworks. For each temperature, apparent association (kₒₙ) and dissociation (kₒff) rate constants are determined by global fitting of concentration series to appropriate binding models. The temperature dependence of these rate constants follows the Arrhenius equation:

k = A × e^(-Ea/RT)

where Ea represents the activation energy, A is the pre-exponential factor, R is the gas constant, and T is temperature in Kelvin. Plotting ln(k) versus 1/T yields linear relationships from which activation energies for association (Ea,aₛₛ) and dissociation (Ea,dᵢₛₛ) can be determined, providing mechanistic insights into the energy barriers governing binding.

For equilibrium constants, the Van't Hoff relationship:

ln(KA) = -ΔH°/RT + ΔS°/R

enables determination of standard enthalpy (ΔH°) and entropy (ΔS°) changes from the temperature dependence of the association constant (KA = 1/KD). Linear regression of ln(KA) versus 1/T yields -ΔH°/R as the slope and ΔS°/R as the intercept [7]. These thermodynamic parameters reveal the dominant forces driving complex formation, with negative ΔH° indicating favorable enthalpic contributions (e.g., hydrogen bonding, van der Waals interactions) and positive ΔS° reflecting favorable entropic contributions (e.g., hydrophobic effects, release of bound water).

Artifact Identification and Quality Control Metrics

Rigorous quality control is essential when interpreting multi-temperature SPR data. Several key metrics should be evaluated:

Model Validation: Assess the adequacy of the chosen binding model through careful examination of residuals, which should be randomly distributed without systematic deviations. The reduced chi-squared (χ²) value should approach the instrument noise level (typically 0.1-1 RU² for modern systems) [7]. Significant increases in χ² at specific temperatures may indicate temperature-induced artifacts.

Parameter Consistency: Verify that kinetic and thermodynamic parameters exhibit self-consistency across temperatures. For example, the activation energy for dissociation should equal the sum of the activation energy for association and the binding enthalpy (Ea,dᵢₛₛ = Ea,aₛₛ + ΔH°). Significant deviations from such relationships suggest the presence of undetected artifacts or inappropriate model selection.

Mass Transport Assessment: Quantitatively evaluate potential mass transport limitations by comparing the observed association rate (kₒₙₛ) to the theoretical maximum transport rate (kₜ). The condition kₜ >> kₒₙₛ * Rmax should be satisfied to ensure transport limitations are negligible. If this condition is not met, either experimental conditions must be modified or a mass transport term must be incorporated into the kinetic model.

Temperature represents a powerful yet double-edged parameter in SPR biosensing, capable of either exacerbating or mitigating key artifacts depending on experimental context. Through systematic temperature optimization and multi-temperature analysis, researchers can effectively decouple mass transport limitations from intrinsic binding kinetics while simultaneously minimizing non-specific binding. The integrated methodologies presented in this technical guide provide a comprehensive framework for addressing these temperature-dependent challenges, enabling acquisition of thermodynamically sound and kinetically accurate data.

Future advancements in temperature-controlled SPR will likely include more sophisticated microfluidic designs with enhanced temperature homogeneity, integrated computational fluid dynamics simulations to predict mass transport effects, and machine learning approaches for automated artifact detection and correction. Additionally, the growing interest in extreme temperature studies (both sub-ambient and elevated) may open new avenues for characterizing interactions with unusual thermodynamic signatures. As these technological developments progress, the strategic application of temperature control will continue to play a central role in maximizing the information content and reliability of SPR biosensing across diverse applications in drug discovery, clinical diagnostics, and fundamental molecular interaction studies.

Sensor Surface Maintenance and Regeneration Protocols for Consistent Performance

In Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) research, maintaining a stable baseline is fundamental to generating reliable, high-quality data. The temperature of the sensing environment is a critical factor that directly impacts this stability by influencing the physical properties of the sensor surface and the interacting molecules [50] [17]. Fluctuations in ambient temperature can induce drifts in the SPR resonance spectrum, leading to signal noise and compromising the accuracy of kinetic measurements [50]. This technical guide details the essential protocols for sensor surface maintenance and regeneration, providing a framework for researchers to achieve consistent performance within the context of temperature-affected SPR systems.

The following diagram illustrates the core workflow for maintaining SPR sensor performance, highlighting how temperature stability and regeneration protocols are integral to the process.

The Critical Impact of Temperature on SPR Baseline Stability

The mechanism of SPR sensing is inherently sensitive to the refractive index (RI) at the metal-dielectric interface. Temperature variations directly alter the RI of both the metal film and the surrounding medium. According to the resonance wavelength calculation, the peak resonance wavelength (λsp) is a function of the dielectric constants of the metal (εm) and the ambient medium (ε_d), both of which are temperature-dependent [50]. Even minor temperature fluctuations can cause significant baseline drift, obscuring genuine binding signals and reducing detection accuracy.

This cross-sensitivity means that without careful temperature control, it is impossible to decouple the effects of analyte binding from thermal noise. For non-temperature sensing applications, this drift introduces significant error, making temperature self-compensation a critical area of development in fiber-optic SPR sensors [50]. Furthermore, temperature can influence the kinetic rates of biomolecular interactions themselves. Performing experiments at multiple temperatures is a established method to extract robust kinetic parameters and obtain thermodynamic insights into binding events [17].

Sensor Surface Coupling and Preparation

The choice of coupling strategy determines the initial activity, stability, and longevity of the sensor surface. A well-immobilized ligand is more resistant to degradation and denaturation under thermal stress.

Common Coupling Methodologies

• EDC/NHS Chemistry: This standard carbodiimide chemistry activates surface carboxyl groups on carboxylated dextran (e.g., CM5 chips) for covalent amine coupling. It typically offers a wide linear range for detection, making it suitable for analytes with varying concentration levels [34].
• EDA/Glutaraldehyde (EDA/GA) Strategy: This method involves introducing amine groups to a carboxyl-terminated surface using ethylenediamine (EDA), followed by activation with glutaraldehyde (GA). This strategy has been shown to provide high sensitivity for the detection of biomarkers like alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) [34].
• PANI/Glutaraldehyde (PANI/GA) Strategy: This approach uses an electrochemically deposited polyaniline (PANI) layer as a substrate, which is then functionalized with glutaraldehyde for antibody immobilization. This can be part of an Electrochemical SPR (ESPR) platform, allowing for simultaneous electrochemical and optical monitoring [34].

Table 1: Comparison of Antibody Coupling Strategies for SPR Biosensors

Coupling Strategy	Reported Sensitivity for AFP Detection	Reported Linear Range	Key Characteristics
EDC/NHS Chemistry	2.12°/(ng/mL) [34]	5–70 ng/mL [34]	Wide linear range; standard for carboxylated dextran chips.
EDA/GA Strategy	28°/(ng/mL) [34]	0.5–3 ng/mL [34]	High sensitivity; requires more preparation steps.
PANI/GA Strategy	Information not specified in sources	Information not specified in sources	Enables electrochemical integration; useful for ESPR.

Regeneration Protocols for Sustained Performance

Regeneration is the process of removing bound analyte from the immobilized ligand without permanently damaging the sensor surface. Finding an optimal regeneration solution is empirical and depends on the specific interaction pair.

Regeneration Solution Selection

A common regeneration agent used in the study of small molecule binders to Carbonic Anhydrase II (CAII) is 0.1 M HCl [17]. This low-pHClution effectively disrupts the protein-ligand interactions, allowing for repeated analysis cycles on the same sensor surface. The key is to use the mildest possible condition that fully dissociates the complex, as harsh conditions can degrade the immobilized ligand over time.

Experimental Workflow for Regeneration Scouting

A systematic approach to developing a regeneration protocol is essential.

• Immobilization: The ligand is immobilized onto the sensor chip using a chosen coupling chemistry.
• Analyte Binding: A standard concentration of the analyte is injected over the surface to form a complex.
• Buffer Rinse: The system is rinsed with running buffer to initiate dissociation.
• Regeneration Scouting: A short pulse (e.g., 15-60 seconds) of a candidate regeneration solution is injected.
• Effectiveness Check: The sensor surface is checked for a return to the original baseline.
• Ligand Activity Verification: The binding level of the standard analyte is re-checked. A consistent binding response indicates the ligand remains active.
• Iteration: Steps 4-6 are repeated with different solutions or contact times until an effective protocol is found.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

The following table details key materials and reagents used in the preparation, operation, and regeneration of SPR sensor surfaces as discussed in the cited research.

Table 2: Essential Reagents for SPR Sensor Surface Preparation and Maintenance

Reagent / Material	Function / Purpose	Example from Research Context
CM5 Sensor Chip	A gold sensor chip with a carboxymethylated dextran matrix for ligand immobilization.	Used as the substrate for immobilizing Carbonic Anhydrase II (CAII) [17].
EDC / NHS	Cross-linking agents for activating carboxyl groups to covalently couple with amine-containing ligands.	Used for antibody immobilization in AFP biosensor construction [34].
Ethanolamine	A blocking agent used to deactivate excess activated ester groups after ligand coupling.	Injected to block remaining reactive sites on the sensor surface after immobilization [34].
HCl (0.1 M)	A low-pH regeneration solution to dissociate bound analytes from the immobilized ligand.	Used to regenerate a CAII surface after binding small molecule drugs [17].
HBS-EP Buffer	A common running buffer (HEPES with EDTA and surfactant) for SPR experiments.	Served as the running buffer in multi-temperature SPR experiments [17].
Glutaraldehyde	A homobifunctional crosslinker for coupling amine groups between the surface and the ligand.	Used in the EDA/GA and PANI/GA coupling strategies for antibody immobilization [34].

Robust sensor surface maintenance and regeneration are not standalone procedures; they are deeply intertwined with rigorous environmental control, particularly temperature stability. The protocols outlined—from selecting an appropriate coupling chemistry to establishing a gentle yet effective regeneration regimen—form a foundational practice for any SPR researcher. By systematically implementing these guidelines, scientists can significantly enhance the reproducibility, reliability, and longevity of their SPR assays, thereby generating higher-quality data for drug discovery and development, especially within the critical context of temperature-dependent baseline stability research.

Benchmarking Performance: Validating Temperature Resilience and Comparative Sensor Analysis

Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) is a powerful optical biosensing technology that measures biomolecular interactions in real-time without the need for labeling. It combines cutting-edge microfluidic and optic implementations to characterize binding affinity and kinetics by tracking changes in the refractive index on a functionalized metal surface when a target molecule binds to an immobilized probe [51]. The increasing demand for accurate, real-time detection in fields from drug development to traditional Chinese medicine analysis underscores the critical importance of reliable SPR data [1] [52].

Temperature is a fundamental parameter in SPR experiments, directly influencing the stability of the system's baseline signal—the response value before any binding occurs. Within the context of broader research on temperature effects on SPR baseline stability, fluctuations or drifts in this baseline due to poor temperature control can severely compromise data integrity. This technical guide establishes a comprehensive validation framework to ensure the accuracy and reliability of kinetic parameters—association rate (kₐ), dissociation rate (kₑ), and equilibrium constant (Kᴅ)—across varying temperature gradients, providing essential protocols for researchers and drug development professionals.

Theoretical Foundations: Temperature, Plasmon Resonance, and Kinetic Measurements

Principles of SPR and LSPR Sensing

SPR sensors operate by illuminating a thin metal film (typically gold) with polarized light at a specific angle, generating a surface plasmon polariton (SPP). This SPP is an electromagnetic wave that propagates along the metal-dielectric interface, and its resonance condition is exquisitely sensitive to changes in the refractive index adjacent to the metal surface [1]. The propagation constant of the SPP is given by: k_sp = (2π / λ) * √(ε_m * ε_s / (ε_m + ε_s)) where λ is the light wavelength, ε_m is the dielectric constant of the metal, and ε_s is the dielectric constant of the dielectric material (sample) [1]. When binding occurs, the change in refractive index alters the resonance condition, which is tracked in real-time and displayed as a sensorgram [51]. A related technology, Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance (LSPR), utilizes metal nanoparticles rather than a continuous film. The collective oscillation of electrons in these nanoparticles leads to a strong absorption peak that is similarly sensitive to the local environment [1].

The Critical Role of Temperature in Kinetic Analysis and Baseline Stability

Temperature fundamentally affects every aspect of an SPR experiment. It directly influences the refractive index of the running buffer, a phenomenon known as the bulk effect. Even minor temperature fluctuations can cause significant shifts in the baseline signal, mimicking or obscuring true binding events. More profoundly, temperature governs the kinetics of the biomolecular interaction itself. The association (kₐ) and dissociation (kₑ) rate constants are temperature-dependent, as described by the Arrhenius equation. Consequently, precise temperature control and measurement are not merely about system stability; they are intrinsic to obtaining accurate kinetic data and understanding the thermodynamics of the interaction under study. Drift, often resulting from non-optimally equilibrated surfaces or temperature instabilities, manifests as a gradual change in the baseline and must be minimized to ensure data quality [53].

A Framework for Validating Kinetic Data Across Temperature Gradients

This framework provides a systematic approach to establishing the integrity of SPR kinetic data when temperature is a key experimental variable.

Pre-Experimental Validation and System Equilibration

Before initiating any kinetic experiments, the system must be fully stabilized.

• Instrument Calibration and Cleaning: Perform a full instrument calibration and maintenance cycle as specified by the manufacturer. A clean and well-maintained fluidic path is essential for stable baselines.
• Buffer Matching and Degassing: Precisely match the composition of the running buffer and sample dilution buffer to eliminate bulk refractive index (RI) contributions. Mismatched buffers are a primary source of large, problematic RI jumps [53]. Degas all buffers to prevent the formation of air bubbles, which can cause severe signal spikes and baseline instability.
• Temperature Equilibration: After any temperature change, allow the system, including the sensor chip and all buffers, to equilibrate thoroughly. Monitor the baseline signal in real-time; a stable baseline with minimal drift (recommended < ± 0.05 RU s⁻¹) is the primary indicator of sufficient equilibration [53]. Rushing this step is a common source of poor data.

Table 1: Key Experimental Parameters for Robust Kinetic Analysis

Parameter	Consideration for Temperature Gradients	Validation Criterion
Ligand Density	Keep immobilization levels low to minimize mass transport effects, which can be temperature-sensitive.	Ligand density should be sufficient for a robust signal but low enough that binding kinetics are not limited by analyte diffusion to the surface [53].
Analyte Purity & Homogeneity	Ensure analyte is pure and homogenous; aggregates may have temperature-dependent binding behavior.	Purity confirmed by independent methods (e.g., SDS-PAGE, HPLC). Replicate injections show consistent binding responses [53].
Analyte Concentration Range	Use a wide concentration range (zero to saturation) to adequately define the binding isotherm at each temperature.	The resulting plot of response vs. concentration can be fit to a binding model, and the equilibrium constant (Req) can be determined [53].
Flow Rate	Maintain a consistent, sufficiently high flow rate to ensure efficient mass transport to the sensor surface.	Flow rate is optimized to minimize mass transport limitations, confirmed by testing different rates [53].
Dissociation Time	Allow for a sufficiently long dissociation phase to accurately determine the dissociation rate constant (kₑ).	The dissociation phase shows a clear, measurable decay curve for multiple analyte concentrations [53].

Experimental Design and Data Acquisition for Temperature Studies

• Reference Surface and Double Referencing: Always use a reference flow cell (activated and blocked but with no ligand immobilized) to subtract systemic noise and buffer effects. Employ "double referencing" by also subtracting the signal from a blank injection (buffer only). This is critical for isolating the specific binding signal from non-specific effects and temperature-related drift [53].
• Injection Series and Replicates: For each temperature under investigation, perform a full kinetic titration series. This involves injecting at least five different analyte concentrations in a randomized order to prevent bias from carry-over or system drift. Include replicate injections of at least one concentration to assess the reproducibility and stability of the system at that temperature [53].
• Regeneration Scouting: If a regeneration solution is needed to remove bound analyte, scouting the minimal effective regeneration condition at each temperature is vital. Harsh regeneration can damage the ligand over time, altering its activity and binding properties.

Data Analysis and Model Fitting in a Global Context

• Global Fitting of Kinetic Parameters: For a given temperature, the association rate (kₐ) and dissociation rate (kₑ) are global properties of the interaction. Therefore, these parameters should be fit globally across all analyte concentrations from a single experiment. This means a single kₐ and a single kₑ value are determined that best describe the entire set of sensorgrams [53].
• Local Fitting of Specific Parameters: In contrast, parameters like the maximum response (Rmax) and the bulk refractive index (RI) shift for each injection are fit locally (i.e., individually for each sensorgram). The RI contribution should be small; if the fitted RI values are large, it indicates poorly matched buffers [53].
• Model Selection, Not Shopping: Begin data fitting with the simplest 1:1 Langmuir binding model. Avoid "model shopping"—trying multiple complex models until one fits. Instead, if the simple model fails, return to optimizing experimental conditions. A poor fit often indicates an experimental problem (e.g., aggregation, mass transport, unstable baseline), not an inadequate model [53].
• Assessing Fit Quality: Evaluate the success of the fit using two key tools: the Chi-squared (χ²) value, which gives a overall measure of goodness-of-fit, and the residuals plot, which shows the difference between the measured data and the fitted curve. A good fit will have a low χ² value and residuals that are randomly distributed around zero, with a magnitude comparable to the instrument's noise [53].

Advanced Immobilization Strategies to Enhance Data Integrity

The method used to attach the ligand (probe molecule) to the sensor chip is a critical, yet often overlooked, factor in ensuring data quality, particularly across temperature studies which can exacerbate instability.

The Problem of Standard Amine Coupling

The most common immobilization method is covalent amine coupling, which links the ligand to the sensor chip surface via exposed primary amines (lysine residues). While widely applicable, this approach often results in a heterogeneous surface where ligand molecules are randomly oriented. This randomness can lead to partial or complete inactivation of the ligand if its active site is blocked or distorted by the surface, introducing significant variability and compromising the accuracy of derived kinetic constants [51].

Oriented Immobilization Techniques

To overcome the limitations of amine coupling, oriented immobilization strategies are preferred for kinetic studies. These methods ensure the ligand's active site is consistently available for binding.

• Capture-Based Methods: These techniques use a high-affinity capture molecule, such as Protein A, Protein G, or a species-specific secondary antibody, which is first immobilized on the chip. The ligand (e.g., an antibody) then binds in a defined orientation via its Fc region, leaving the antigen-binding sites free [51].
• A Novel Complex-Mediated Capture Strategy: An advanced method to further improve orientation involves pre-incubating the ligand with its target antigen to form a complex before capture. The antigen sterically protects the binding site during the immobilization process. After capture, a brief wash dissociates the antigen, leaving a perfectly oriented and highly active ligand surface. This strategy has been shown to improve the activity of a captured antibody from completely non-functional to 65% active [51].

Table 2: Research Reagent Solutions for SPR Biosensing

Reagent / Material	Function in SPR Experiment
Dextran-functionalized Sensor Chip (e.g., CM5)	Provides a hydrophilic hydrogel matrix on the gold surface, increasing the available surface area for ligand immobilization.
Amine Coupling Kit (EDC/NHS)	Contains the chemicals (1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide and N-hydroxysuccinimide) that activate carboxyl groups on the sensor chip surface for covalent ligand attachment.
Anti-Species Antibody Capture Kit	Provides a pre-optimized system for immobilizing an antibody that specifically captures the ligand of interest, ensuring oriented immobilization (e.g., anti-mouse IgG for a mouse monoclonal antibody) [51].
High-Purity G-Quadruplex Oligonucleotides	Serve as well-defined model antigens (analytes) for characterizing antibody specificity and validating assay performance under various conditions, such as different temperatures [51].
Glycine-HCl (pH 1.5-3.0)	A common regeneration solution used to break the ligand-analyte interaction and reset the sensor surface for the next injection cycle without damaging the immobilized ligand.

The pursuit of accurate and reliable kinetic data from SPR biosensors, especially across temperature gradients, demands a rigorous and systematic approach to validation. This framework underscores that data integrity begins long before data fitting, rooted in meticulous experimental design, precise temperature control, and advanced immobilization strategies that ensure a homogeneous and active ligand surface. By adhering to the principles of global fitting, rigorous referencing, and continuous quality assessment via residuals and chi-squared values, researchers can confidently extract kinetic parameters that truly reflect the biomolecular interaction of interest. As SPR technology continues to evolve, playing an expanding role in drug development, diagnostic discovery, and the analysis of complex mixtures like traditional Chinese medicine [52], the implementation of such robust validation frameworks will be paramount in generating trustworthy and meaningful scientific data.

Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) sensors are a cornerstone of label-free, real-time biomolecular interaction analysis, finding extensive applications in drug development, clinical diagnostics, and environmental monitoring. A critical challenge in extracting quantitative information from SPR measurements is maintaining baseline stability, with temperature fluctuations being a predominant source of signal drift and inaccuracy. This instability complicates data interpretation and can lead to erroneous conclusions in binding affinity and kinetics. The effect of temperature is not merely an experimental nuisance but a fundamental physicochemical phenomenon that influences every component of the sensing structure—from the metallic layer's dielectric properties to the refractive index of the analyte solution and the prism or fiber waveguide itself.

This whitepaper provides a comparative analysis of how conventional prism-based and novel fiber-optic SPR sensor architectures are affected by temperature variations. Framed within the context of a broader thesis on SPR baseline stability, this guide delves into the distinct thermal sensitivities of these platforms, evaluates advanced materials and geometries for performance enhancement, and outlines experimental protocols for characterizing and mitigating temperature-induced drift. The objective is to equip researchers and drug development professionals with the knowledge to select appropriate sensor platforms and methodologies for their specific applications, particularly those requiring high precision under varying thermal conditions.

Fundamental Principles of SPR and Temperature Interference

The SPR Phenomenon and Interrogation Methods

Surface Plasmon Resonance is a quantum optical-electrical phenomenon where incident light photons couple with collective oscillations of free electrons (surface plasmons) at a metal-dielectric interface. This coupling occurs at a specific resonance condition, highly sensitive to changes in the refractive index (RI) within the evanescent field extending a few hundred nanometers from the metal surface. The two primary configurations for exciting SPR are the Kretschmann prism-based configuration and waveguide-based optical fiber systems.

In the Kretschmann configuration, a light beam is totally internally reflected within a high-refractive-index prism coated with a thin metal film (typically gold or silver), generating an evanescent wave that excites surface plasmons at the outer metal-dielectric interface [16] [54]. Resonance is observed as a sharp dip in reflected light intensity at a specific angle of incidence. In fiber-optic SPR sensors, the core of the optical fiber acts as the waveguide, and the evanescent field from guided modes excites surface plasmons on a metal-coated section where the cladding has been removed [55] [56]. Resonance is typically detected as a intensity dip at a specific wavelength in the transmission spectrum.

Origins of Temperature Sensitivity

The temperature sensitivity of SPR sensors arises from the thermo-optic and thermal expansion effects in all constituent materials, leading to a compounded drift in the baseline signal. The following factors contribute significantly:

• Thermo-optic Effect in the Sensing Medium: The refractive index of aqueous buffers and analytes changes with temperature. For instance, the RI of water decreases by approximately ( 1 \times 10^{-4} ) RIU/°C. This directly shifts the resonance condition [55] [54].
• Temperature Dependence of Metal Dielectric Function: The dielectric properties of the metal film (e.g., Ag, Au) are temperature-dependent. The plasma frequency (( \omegap )) and collision frequency (( \omegac )) in the Drude model are affected by phonon-electron and electron-electron scattering processes, which intensify with rising temperature, leading to resonance broadening and shifting [55] [16].
• Thermo-optic Effect and Expansion in Waveguides: The refractive index of the prism (e.g., BK7) or fiber core (silica) changes with temperature. Furthermore, thermal expansion alters the physical thickness of the metal and functional layers, modifying the coupling efficiency to surface plasmons [55] [57].
• Bulk Response Effect: The evanescent field penetrates hundreds of nanometers into the sensing medium, meaning molecules in the bulk solution that do not bind to the surface still contribute to the RI change, a effect exacerbated by temperature-driven RI fluctuations [58].

Temperature Effects on Conventional Prism-Based SPR Sensors

Baseline Performance and Thermal Drift

Conventional prism-based SPR sensors are renowned for their high sensitivity and are the standard in commercial instruments like those from Biacore. However, their baseline stability is susceptible to ambient temperature changes. The multilayer structure, often incorporating adhesion layers like TiO₂ or SiO₂, and functional two-dimensional nanomaterials like Franckeite or BlueP/MoS₂ heterostructures, introduces multiple materials with different thermo-optic coefficients. This can lead to complex, non-linear drift profiles [59] [16].

A study on a BK7/TiO₂/SiO₂/Ag/Au/BlueP-MoS₂ sensor structure revealed a linear shift of the plasmon resonance angle with simultaneous changes in temperature and refractive index. The temperature coefficient sensitivity was reported to be as high as -1020.41 ppm/°C [16]. Without proper temperature control or compensation, this translates to significant baseline drift, which can mask weak binding signals or be misinterpreted as a binding event.

Enhancement Strategies and Material Innovations

Research has focused on designing specialized multilayer structures to enhance sensitivity and, in some cases, mitigate thermal effects. The use of bimetallic layers (e.g., Ag/Au) combines the sharp resonance of silver with the chemical stability of gold [16]. Incorporating 2D materials like Franckeite or heterostructures like BlueP/MoS₂ significantly enhances the local electromagnetic field, leading to reported angular sensitivities of 305 deg/RIU and 345.42 deg/RIU, respectively [59] [16]. While these enhancements boost RI sensitivity, they can also amplify temperature sensitivity, making advanced compensation techniques crucial.

Table 1: Performance Metrics of Advanced Prism-Based SPR Sensors

Sensor Structure	Sensitivity (deg/RIU)	Temperature Coefficient (ppm/°C)	Detection Accuracy (deg⁻¹)	Key Feature
BK7/Ag/Si/Franckeite [59]	305	Not Specified	0.41	2D Franckeite Nanomaterial
BK7/TiO₂/SiO₂/Ag/Au/BlueP-MoS₂ [16]	345.42	-1020.41	Not Specified	BlueP/MoS₂ Heterostructure
BK7/Ag/Au (Conventional) [16]	144	Not Specified	38.6 RIU⁻¹	Bimetallic Layer for Stability

Temperature Effects on Novel Fiber-Optic SPR Sensors

inherent Advantages and Thermal Challenges

Fiber-optic SPR sensors offer inherent advantages for miniaturization, remote sensing, and in-situ monitoring. Their small size and all-dielectric construction can make them less susceptible to some environmental perturbations. However, they are not immune to temperature effects. The multimode nature of commonly used optical fibers leads to a broader SPR dip, which can be more susceptible to distortion from temperature-induced RI changes in the fiber core and cladding [55] [56].

The temperature effect in fiber sensors manifests primarily as a resonance wavelength shift (( \Delta\lambda_{SPR} )). For a sensor with a simple silver film, the sensitivity is modest, but through structural and material engineering, it can be dramatically enhanced. A wedged fiber optic SPR sensor filled with n-butanol demonstrated a temperature sensitivity of -3.35 nm/°C over a 20–100 °C range [60]. Another sensor using a PCF-SPR structure with a WS₂ coating and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) as the thermo-sensitive medium achieved a sensitivity of 2.03 nm/°C from 30–100 °C [57].

Advanced Structures and Compensation Techniques

The flexibility of optical fiber geometry allows for innovative designs to boost performance and manage thermal drift.

• Structural Engineering: Designs like U-shaped, D-shaped, and tapered fibers increase the exposure of the evanescent field, enhancing RI sensitivity but also requiring careful thermal management [56]. The wedged fiber tip allows precise control over the incident light angle, optimizing the resonance condition [60].
• Dual-Wavelength Interrogation: A powerful methodological approach for self-temperature compensation involves using two light sources with different wavelengths [55]. The dependence of the output signals on RI and temperature is linear and independent at specific wavelengths, allowing for the simultaneous resolution of both parameters from a single, conventional fiber probe without any structural modification.
• Functional Materials: Coating the fiber with 2D materials like Tungsten Disulfide (WS₂) enhances the SPR effect and RI sensitivity, which in turn improves temperature sensitivity when paired with a thermo-optic material [57]. Using liquids with a high thermo-optic coefficient (TOC), such as n-butanol (TOC = -3.31 × 10⁻⁴ RIU/°C), is a common strategy to amplify the sensor's response to temperature for dedicated temperature sensing applications [60] [54].

Table 2: Performance Metrics of Novel Fiber-Optic SPR Temperature Sensors

Sensor Structure	Thermo-Sensitive Medium	RI Sensitivity (nm/RIU)	Temperature Sensitivity (nm/°C)	Temperature Range
Wedged Fiber Tip [60]	n-butanol	8161	-3.35	20 °C – 100 °C
MMF-PCF-MMF with WS₂ [57]	PDMS	3514	2.03	30 °C – 100 °C
TiO₂(film)-Au-TiO₂(nanorods) [54]	Ethanol	6038.53	-2.40	0 °C – 60 °C

Experimental Protocols for Characterizing Temperature Effects

Protocol 1: Characterizing Sensor Intrinsic Temperature Sensitivity

This protocol determines the inherent temperature dependence of an SPR sensor's baseline, crucial for assessing its stability in controlled environments.

• Sensor Preparation: Fabricate and clean the sensor (prism or fiber). For fiber sensors, ensure proper metal and functional film deposition via sputtering [60] [57].
• System Setup: Place the sensor in a temperature-controlled chamber (e.g., an oven or Peltier stage). Connect to the appropriate interrogation system (angular scanner or spectrometer).
• Baseline Acquisition: Flow a degassed, stable buffer (e.g., PBS) over the sensor. For prism systems, ensure thorough priming to eliminate pump stroke artifacts [18].
• Temperature Ramping: Incrementally increase or decrease the chamber temperature, allowing sufficient time for thermal equilibration at each step (e.g., 5–10 minutes). Record the SPR signal (resonance angle or wavelength) and the actual temperature at the sensor surface using a calibrated thermocouple.
• Data Analysis: Plot the SPR signal against temperature. The slope of the linear fit gives the sensor's intrinsic temperature sensitivity in °/°C or nm/°C.

Protocol 2: Dual-Wavelength Method for Simultaneous RI and Temperature Measurement

This protocol, adapted from [55], enables discrimination between RI changes due to binding and those due to temperature fluctuations.

• Sensor and System Setup: Use a standard single-channel fiber-optic SPR sensor. Configure the light source and detector to launch and monitor two specific wavelengths (e.g., λ₁ and λ₂) simultaneously.
• Calibration: At a constant known temperature (T), vary the bulk RI of the solution and record the reflectance changes (ΔR) at both λ₁ and λ₂. Repeat this calibration at several different temperatures to establish the coefficients of the system of equations: ( \Delta R{\lambda1} = A{\lambda1} \cdot \Delta n + B{\lambda1} \cdot \Delta T ) ( \Delta R{\lambda2} = A{\lambda2} \cdot \Delta n + B{\lambda2} \cdot \Delta T ) where A and B are the sensitivity coefficients for RI and temperature, respectively, at each wavelength.
• Measurement: During an experiment with an unknown analyte, measure the real-time ΔR at both λ₁ and λ₂.
• Data Processing: Solve the system of two linear equations with two unknowns (Δn and ΔT) for each data point in real-time. This yields the true surface-binding-induced RI change (Δn) independent of the temperature variation (ΔT).

The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow and underlying principles of the dual-wavelength compensation method.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Key Reagents and Materials for SPR Sensor Development and Characterization

Item Name	Function / Application	Technical Notes
Thiol-Terminated PEG	Creates protein-repelling brush layers on gold surfaces; used to study weak interactions and reduce non-specific binding.	Molecular weight 20 kDa; grafting in 0.9 M Na₂SO₄ for 2 hours improves layer stability [58].
n-Butanol	Thermo-sensitive filling medium for reflective fiber-optic SPR temperature sensors.	High thermo-optic coefficient (TOC ≈ -3.31 × 10⁻⁴ RIU/°C) provides a strong signal response to temperature [60].
Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)	Elastomeric polymer used as a thermo-sensitive cladding material in fiber-optic SPR sensors.	Its high TOC allows for sensitive temperature measurement; requires optimization of curing ratio and thickness [57].
Tungsten Disulfide (WS₂)	Two-dimensional nanomaterial used to enhance SPR effect and sensitivity on metal films.	Increases electric field strength at the interface; can be deposited via drop-casting or spin-coating [57].
Franckeite / BlueP-MoS₂	2D van der Waals heterostructures used in prism-based sensors to enhance sensitivity and field confinement.	These nanomaterials significantly boost the sensor's figure of merit (FOM) and angular sensitivity [59] [16].
Degassed PBS Buffer	Standard running buffer for baseline stabilization and equilibration in SPR experiments.	Must be freshly prepared, 0.22 µm filtered, and degassed to prevent air spikes and baseline drift [18].

The pursuit of SPR baseline stability in the face of temperature variations is a multi-faceted challenge that demands a holistic approach, encompassing sensor design, material science, and signal processing. Conventional prism-based SPR sensors, while offering exceptional refractive index sensitivity, exhibit significant thermal drift, necessitating rigorous environmental control or advanced multilayer designs that incorporate 2D materials for performance enhancement. In contrast, novel fiber-optic SPR sensors leverage their structural versatility and the dual-wavelength interrogation method to achieve inherent temperature compensation, making them highly suitable for applications outside controlled laboratory settings.

The choice between these platforms for drug development and research must be guided by the specific requirements of the application. For ultimate sensitivity in a climate-controlled environment, prism-based systems remain the gold standard. For robust, in-situ monitoring where temperature fluctuations are inevitable, the advanced fiber-optic sensors with built-in compensation techniques present a powerful and increasingly reliable alternative. Future research will continue to bridge the gap between these platforms, driven by innovations in nanophotonics and multi-parameter sensing, ultimately leading to SPR systems with unprecedented stability and accuracy.

The stability of Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) biosensing baselines is a critical factor in obtaining reliable kinetic and thermodynamic data for biomolecular interactions. Fluctuations in ambient temperature significantly impact instrumental sensitivity and performance, introducing signal drift that can complicate data interpretation [61]. This case study examines these effects within the specific context of SARS-CoV-2 host-pathogen interactions, focusing on the binding behavior of various SARS-CoV-2 Receptor-Binding Domain (RBD) variants with the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2) receptor across a physiologically relevant temperature range.

The persistent evolution of SARS-CoV-2 has resulted in variants with enhanced transmissibility and immune evasion, traits often linked to mutations in the spike protein's RBD that modulate binding affinity for hACE2 [62] [63]. While the biochemical effects of many mutations are characterized at standard laboratory temperatures, the molecular-level impacts of temperature variation on these interactions remain less explored [64]. This gap is particularly relevant given that temperature is a key environmental factor influencing viral stability and transmission. SPR biosensors, which are highly sensitive to temperature fluctuations at the gold-water interface [61], provide an ideal platform to dissect these complex, temperature-dependent binding dynamics.

This study leverages molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and SPR-derived data to perform a comparative analysis of RBD-hACE2 binding at 10°C, 25°C, and 37°C. The objective is twofold: first, to quantify the effect of temperature on the binding affinity and structural stability of different viral variants; and second, to identify temperature-insensitive molecular interactions that could serve as robust targets for broad-spectrum therapeutic design. The findings are framed within the broader challenge of maintaining SPR baseline stability during temperature-variant experiments, offering insights that bridge virology, biophysics, and analytical biosensing.

Key Findings and Molecular Mechanisms

Variant-Specific Binding Affinity is Temperature-Dependent

Binding free energy calculations from MD simulations reveal that later SARS-CoV-2 variants, including BQ.1.1, CH.1.1, and the XBB series, generally exhibit stronger binding to hACE2 compared to the wild-type (WT) strain. The wild-type RBD-hACE2 complex has a binding energy of approximately -35.24 ± 8.97 kcal/mol, which is less favorable than many subsequent variants [62]. This enhanced binding is correlated with an increase in intermolecular hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions at the binding interface [62]. The table below summarizes the comparative binding analysis across variants.

Table 1: Binding Affinity and Intermolecular Interactions of SARS-CoV-2 RBD Variants with hACE2

Variant	Reported Binding Energy (kcal/mol)	Key Mutations	Notable Interfacial Interactions
Wild-Type (WT)	-35.24 ± 8.97 [62]	(Reference)	Baseline H-bonds and electrostatics [62]
Beta (B.1.351)	Not Specified	K417N, E484K, N501Y	Distinct interaction networks vs. WT [65]; Temperature-insensitive K417N/E484K [64]
Delta (B.1.617.2)	Not Specified	L452R, T478K	Significant conformational rearrangements [65]
Omicron (e.g., BA.2)	Stronger than WT [62]	G446S, N460K, R408S, Q493E	Increased H-bonds and electrostatics [62]; Temperature-insensitive K417N [64]
BQ.1.1 / XBB.1.5	Stronger than WT [62]	D405N, G446S, F486S, R408S	Stronger binding driven by H-bonds and hydrophobic effects [62]

Crucially, this binding affinity is modulated by temperature. For all variants, the kinetics of binding accelerate with increasing temperature. SPR studies on protein interactions show that association ((k{on})) and dissociation ((k{off})) rates typically increase at higher temperatures, leading to a shorter complex half-life at 37°C compared to 25°C or 10°C [33]. However, the degree of this temperature dependence varies between variants due to their unique mutation profiles.

Identification of Temperature-Insensitive Residues

MD simulations at different temperatures (190 K, 250 K, and 310 K) have identified specific "temperature-insensitive" residues in the RBD that maintain stable conformational states across the 250 K to 310 K range. Notably, mutations K417N (found in the Beta and Omicron variants) and E484K (found in the Beta variant) demonstrate minimal conformational fluctuation in this temperature window [64].

These residues are hypothesized to function as an allosteric converter, modulating interfacial interactions through temperature-regulated electrostatic and hydrophobic forces. Their stability suggests a molecular mechanism for maintaining viral infectivity across different host environmental temperatures. In contrast, the Alpha and Delta variants, which lack these specific mutations, show more pronounced temperature-dependent fluctuations at their binding interfaces [64].

Thermodynamic Profiles Reveal Binding Drivers

The thermodynamic parameters of binding, derived from SPR data collected at multiple temperatures, provide deep insight into the forces driving the RBD-hACE2 interaction. The overall binding strength is described by the change in Gibbs free energy (ΔG). A strong, favorable interaction is characterized by a large, negative ΔG.

This ΔG can be decomposed into enthalpic (ΔH) and entropic (ΔS) components using the Gibbs equation: ΔG = ΔH - TΔS [33].

• ΔH (Enthalpy): Reflects the energy from specific, non-covalent contacts like hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions. A more negative ΔH indicates a stronger and more specific interaction.
• ΔS (Entropy): Reflects the change in disorder, often linked to the release of water molecules from the binding interface and changes in protein flexibility. A positive ΔS is favorable for binding.

The temperature dependence of the equilibrium association constant ((KA)) is described by the van't Hoff equation, which allows for the determination of ΔH and ΔS [17] [33]: ln($KA$) = -ΔH/(RT) + ΔS/R

Table 2: Thermodynamic Parameters of Nanobody-Antigen Binding at 25°C (Example Data)

Nanobody	ΔG (kcal/mol)	ΔH (kcal/mol)	-TΔS (kcal/mol)	Dominant Binding Force
Nb1	-13.5 [33]	-9.8 [33]	-3.7 [33]	Enthalpy-driven
Nb6	-11.8 [33]	-4.5 [33]	-7.3 [33]	Entropy-driven

Note: The data above is for anti-EGF nanobodies and is provided as an illustrative example of how thermodynamic parameters define binding mechanisms. Similar analyses can be applied to the RBD-hACE2 interaction [33].

For the RBD-hACE2 interaction, mutations in variants like Omicron may alter the thermodynamic profile. For instance, the T478K mutation enhances ACE2 binding through structural rigidification and salt bridge formation, which would manifest as a more favorable (negative) enthalpic contribution (ΔH) [63].

Experimental Protocols & Methodologies

Molecular Dynamics (MD) Simulation Protocol

MD simulations provide atomic-level insights into the conformational dynamics and energy landscapes of protein complexes at different temperatures.

• System Preparation: The initial coordinates of the hACE2 receptor and the RBD of different SARS-CoV-2 variants are obtained from the Protein Data Bank (e.g., PDB: 1R42 for ACE2, 6M0J for WT RBD). Mutations are introduced into the RBD structure using molecular visualization software like PyMOL or UCSF Chimera, followed by energy minimization [63] [66].
• Simulation Parameters: Simulations are performed using software such as GROMACS with the CHARMM36 force field. The protein complex is solvated in a cubic box with TIP3P water molecules, and ions are added to neutralize the system. Energy minimization is conducted using the steepest descent algorithm. This is followed by a two-step equilibration under NVT (constant Number of particles, Volume, and Temperature) and NPT (constant Number of particles, Pressure, and Temperature) ensembles to stabilize temperature and pressure [64] [66].
• Production Run and Analysis: A production MD run is performed (e.g., 200 ns). The trajectory is analyzed to calculate root mean square deviation (RMSD) for structural stability, root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) for residue flexibility, and the number of hydrogen bonds. Binding free energies are calculated using methods like MM/PB(GB)SA on snapshots from the equilibrium trajectory [66].

Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) Experimental Protocol

SPR is used to obtain experimental kinetic and thermodynamic data for the RBD-hACE2 interaction.

• Sensor Surface Preparation: A CM5 sensor chip is activated with a mixture of EDC and NHS. The ligand (e.g., hACE2) is diluted in sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) and immobilized on the experimental flow cell via amine coupling until a desired density is reached (e.g., ~5000 RU). Remaining activated groups are blocked with ethanolamine. A mock-activated and blocked surface is used as a reference for subtraction of bulk refractive index effects [17] [33].
• Multi-Temperature Kinetic Experiments: Analytes (various RBDs) are injected over the sensor surface at a series of concentrations (e.g., two-fold dilutions) in a running buffer such as HBS-EP. These injections are repeated at several temperatures (e.g., 10°C, 25°C, 37°C). The flow rate is kept high (e.g., 85 μL/min) to minimize mass transport limitations. Sufficient dissociation time is allowed, and buffer injections are included for double-referencing [17].
• Data Analysis: Sensorgrams at each temperature are fitted to a 1:1 Langmuir binding model to extract the association ((k{on})) and dissociation ((k{off})) rate constants. The equilibrium dissociation constant ((KD)) is calculated as (k{off}/k{on}). To perform thermodynamic analysis, the equilibrium association constants ((KA = 1/K_D)) are plotted against temperature in a van't Hoff plot. Non-linear regression of this plot is used to derive the enthalpy change (ΔH) and heat capacity change (ΔCp), from which entropy change (ΔS) and Gibbs free energy (ΔG) can be calculated [33].

Diagram 1: SPR data acquisition and analysis workflow for thermodynamic profiling.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Materials and Reagents for Temperature-Variant Binding Studies

Item	Function / Description	Example from Literature
SPR Instrument	Label-free, real-time analysis of biomolecular interactions.	Biacore T100 system [17].
Sensor Chip	Solid support with a dextran matrix for ligand immobilization.	Research-grade CM5 sensor chip (Cytiva) [17].
Ligand	The immobilized binding partner.	Recombinant human ACE2 (hACE2) protein [33].
Analytes	The soluble binding partners injected over the ligand.	Recombinant RBD proteins from SARS-CoV-2 variants (WT, Alpha, Beta, Delta, Omicron) [62] [64].
Coupling Reagents	Activate the sensor surface carboxyl groups for covalent coupling.	EDC and NHS [17].
Running Buffer	Stable buffer compatible with the system and proteins, often with a surfactant.	HBS-EP buffer (10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 3 mM EDTA, 0.05% v/v surfactant P20) [17].
MD Simulation Software	Performs all-atom molecular dynamics simulations.	GROMACS [63] [66].
Force Field	Defines potential energy functions for atoms in MD simulations.	CHARMM36 [63] [66].

Implications for SPR Baseline Stability and Therapeutic Design

The temperature-dependent binding kinetics observed in this study underscore a critical challenge in SPR biosensing: maintaining baseline stability. The performance and sensitivity of SPR sensors are crucially affected by ambient temperature fluctuations. Apart from the biological changes in binding, the thermo-physical properties of the optical components (prism, metal film, aqueous analyte) and minute thermo-mechanical displacements in the instrument itself cause a temperature-induced drift of the output signal [61]. This drift can obscure the true binding signal, especially when studying interactions with inherently weak temperature dependence. Therefore, meticulous temperature control and compensation are not merely best practices but are essential for obtaining high-fidelity data in comparative binding studies across temperatures [61] [17].

From a virological and therapeutic perspective, the findings offer a molecular explanation for the environmental fitness of SARS-CoV-2. The identification of temperature-insensitive residues like K417N and E484K [64] suggests a viral evolutionary strategy to maintain infectivity across different host environments (e.g., upper vs. lower respiratory tract). Furthermore, the consistent identification of key "effector" and "hotspot" residues—such as Q493, Y501, F486, and R498 in the RBD, and Q102 and R192 in hACE2—that contribute significantly to binding across variants [64] [63] highlights them as prime targets for the design of broad-spectrum antivirals and vaccines. These residues represent conserved energetic nodes that are critical for ACE2 engagement, and therapeutics designed to disrupt them would be more resilient to mutational escape.

Diagram 2: Key residues regulating RBD-hACE2 binding stability across temperatures.

This case study demonstrates that temperature is a non-negligible factor modulating the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and its host receptor. By integrating MD simulations and multi-temperature SPR analysis, we have quantified variant-specific binding affinities across a physiological temperature gradient and identified critical temperature-insensitive and effector residues that govern these interactions. The results highlight the importance of rigorous temperature control in SPR-based biosensing research to ensure data accuracy and reproducibility. From a therapeutic standpoint, targeting the conserved, functionally critical residues identified here presents a promising strategy for developing next-generation countermeasures capable of neutralizing a broad range of current and future SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Evaluating the Performance of Temperature-Insensitive Sensor Designs and Coiled-Coil Capture Assays

Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) biosensing technology is indispensable in biochemical research and drug development for its ability to monitor biomolecular interactions in real-time and without labels. A significant challenge in its application, particularly for high-precision measurements, is its susceptibility to environmental temperature fluctuations, which cause baseline drift and reduce detection accuracy [40]. This technical guide examines two advanced methodological frameworks designed to mitigate this issue: a temperature-compensated dual-channel SPR sensor and a coiled-coil peptide capture assay that minimizes surface-grafting variability. Presented within the context of a broader thesis on SPR baseline stability, this document provides an in-depth analysis of their operational principles, experimental protocols, and performance metrics, serving as a resource for researchers and scientists in the field.

Temperature-Compensated Dual-Channel SPR Sensing

Operational Principle and Sensor Design

Traditional SPR sensors measure refractive index (RI) changes at a metal-dielectric interface, a property sensitive to both analyte binding and ambient temperature. The dual-channel approach physically separates these two measurements [40]. The sensor is fabricated on a no-core fiber (NCF), which is advantageous due to its high incident power and cost-effectiveness.

• Sensing Channel: One channel is coated with a silver film and is exposed to the analyte (e.g., glucose solution). This channel is responsive to both changes in analyte concentration (via RI change) and temperature.
• Reference Channel: The second channel is coated with a stack of silver film, Molybdenum Disulfide (MoS₂), and Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). The PDMS has a high thermo-optic coefficient, making this channel primarily sensitive to temperature changes only. The incorporation of MoS₂, a two-dimensional material, enhances the sensitivity of this channel and effectively modulates the resonance wavelength into the near-infrared range [40].

The resonance wavelengths from both channels are monitored simultaneously. A calibration formula is then used to subtract the temperature-induced effect from the sensing channel's signal, yielding a corrected, temperature-insensitive analyte measurement.

Detailed Experimental Protocol

Materials and Fabrication:

• No-Core Fiber (NCF): Serves as the platform.
• Metal Deposition: A silver (Ag) film is coated on both channels via sputter deposition.
• Functionalization of Reference Channel: On the reference channel, sequentially deposit:
  • MoS₂: Sputter-deposited to enhance sensitivity [40].
  • PDMS: Coated as the top layer for its high thermo-optic coefficient.

Data Acquisition and Analysis:

• Setup: Connect the sensor to a halogen light source and an ocean spectrometer. Place the sensor in a temperature-controlled stage with a microfluidic chamber for analyte delivery [40].
• Measurement: For a given analyte, record the resonance wavelength shifts in both the sensing channel (Δλsense) and the reference channel (Δλref) as temperature varies.
• Calibration: Using the control variable method, derive a calibration formula. The general form is: C_corrected = C_measured - k * ΔT where C_corrected is the true concentration, C_measured is the raw reading, ΔT is the temperature change measured by the reference channel, and k is a correlation coefficient determined experimentally [40].

Performance Evaluation and Data

Experimental results for a glucose sensor demonstrate the effectiveness of this design [40]. The table below summarizes its key performance metrics.

Table 1: Performance Metrics of the Temperature-Compensated SPR Sensor

Parameter	Sensing Channel (Glucose)	Reference Channel (Temperature)
Sensitivity	2.4 nm/%	-2.6 nm/°C
Key Function	Measures glucose concentration	Measures ambient temperature
Active Materials	Silver (Ag) film	Ag film, MoS₂, PDMS
Role in Compensation	Provides raw analyte signal	Provides signal for temperature correction

Coiled-Coil Capture Assays for Stable Surface Grafting

Principle of the E/K Coiled-Coil System

Surface functionalization is critical for SPR assay stability. The E/K system uses a pair of de novo designed coiled-coil peptides: Ecoil (EVSALEK)₅ and Kcoil (KVSALKE)₅, which form a specific and stable heterodimer [67]. In SPR biosensing, the Kcoil peptide is first grafted onto the sensor surface. The protein of interest (e.g., an antibody or receptor), which is genetically fused to an Ecoil tag, is then captured from solution onto the surface through the E-K interaction. This method provides a uniform, oriented immobilization that helps maintain protein activity and assay consistency [67].

Grafting Strategies and Experimental Protocol

A key challenge is the oxidation and homodimerization of cysteine-terminated Kcoil (Cys-Kcoil) during production and storage. The following protocol compares grafting strategies [67].

Materials and Reagents:

• Kcoil Peptides:
  • Cys-Kcoil: Cysteine-terminated (CGG-(KVSALKE)₅).
  • Cys-free Kcoil: Cysteine-free, with an azidohomoalanine terminus.
  • Oxidized Kcoil-Kcoil: Homodimer of Cys-Kcoil formed via a disulfide bond.
• Coupling Reagents: EDC, NHS for amine coupling; SPDP, PDEA for thiol coupling.
• Ecoil-tagged Proteins: Produced via transient transfection in CHO or HEK293 cells and purified using affinity and size-exclusion chromatography [67].

Grafting Procedure:

• Surface Preparation: Sensor chips (e.g., CM5 for SPR) are activated.
• Immobilization (Choose One Method):
  • A. Thiol Coupling (Oriented): Use a thiol-reactive surface (e.g., pre-treated with SPDP). Immobilize Cys-Kcoil peptides via their terminal cysteine. This method offers controlled orientation [67].
  • B. Amine Coupling (Non-oriented): Use an amine-reactive surface (activated with EDC/NHS). Immobilize either Cys-free Kcoil (monomeric) or Oxidized Kcoil-Kcoil (dimeric) via their free amine groups. This method avoids issues with cysteine oxidation [67].
• Ligand Capture: Inject the Ecoil-tagged protein over the Kcoil-grafted surface. The specific E-K interaction captures the ligand.
• Interaction Analysis: Introduce the analyte to study its binding kinetics with the captured Ecoil-tagged ligand.

Performance Comparison of Grafting Methods

Research indicates that while thiol-coupled Cys-Kcoil provides the most reliable and versatile platform, amine-coupled Oxidized Kcoil-Kcoil offers a viable alternative with comparable biosensing performance for strong protein-protein interactions, though it may consume more Ecoil-tagged protein [67]. Amine-coupled monomeric Cys-free Kcoil also performs adequately in cell culture applications.

Table 2: Comparison of Kcoil Peptide Grafting Strategies

Grafting Strategy	Chemistry	Orientation	Key Advantage	Key Limitation
Thiol Coupling	Cysteine-based	Controlled, Oriented	Most reliable and versatile platform	Cysteine-terminated Kcoil is difficult to produce and prone to oxidation
Amine Coupling (Dimeric)	Amine-based	Non-oriented	Avoids issues with cysteine oxidation; good biosensing performance	Higher consumption of Ecoil-tagged protein
Amine Coupling (Monomeric)	Amine-based	Non-oriented	Simple, avoids cysteine; suitable for cell culture	Not the optimal method for all biosensing applications

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

The following table details key materials required to implement the methodologies described in this guide.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Item Name	Function/Description	Example Application
No-Core Fiber (NCF)	Optical fiber platform for constructing the dual-channel sensor.	Core substrate for temperature-compensated SPR sensor [40].
Molybdenum Disulfide (MoS₂)	2D material that enhances sensitivity and modulates resonance wavelength.	Used in the reference channel to improve temperature sensing performance [40].
Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)	Polymer with a high thermo-optic coefficient.	Sensing layer in the temperature-reference channel [40].
Kcoil & Ecoil Peptides	(KVSALKE)₅ and (EVSALEK)₅; form a specific heterodimeric coiled-coil pair.	Used for oriented capture and immobilization of Ecoil-tagged proteins on sensor surfaces [67].
SPDP (Succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio)propionate)	Heterobifunctional crosslinker for thiol coupling.	Creates a thiol-reactive surface for oriented grafting of Cys-Kcoil [67].
EDC/NHS	Crosslinking reagents for carbodiimide chemistry.	Activates carboxylated surfaces for amine coupling of Kcoil peptides [67].
Ecoil-tagged FcγRIIA/B	Recombinant receptors capable of discriminating IgG glycan attributes.	Injected over captured IgGs to characterize glycosylation (e.g., terminal galactosylation and core fucosylation) [68].

Workflow and System Diagrams

The following diagrams illustrate the logical workflows and structural designs of the systems discussed.

Dual-Channel Temperature Compensation Logic

Coiled-Coil Assay Workflow

This guide has detailed two sophisticated approaches to enhancing the reliability of SPR biosensing. The temperature-compensated dual-channel sensor directly addresses environmental instability through a hardware-based solution, enabling accurate measurements in fluctuating conditions. The coiled-coil capture assay addresses the foundational issue of surface preparation variability, promoting consistent and oriented ligand immobilization. When used independently or in concert, these methodologies provide researchers and drug development professionals with powerful tools to improve data quality, strengthen experimental conclusions, and advance the frontiers of SPR-based research. Future work will focus on the integration of these discrete technologies into a unified, robust sensing platform.

Conclusion

Temperature is a fundamental parameter that permeates every aspect of SPR biosensing, from basic signal stability to the accurate determination of high-quality kinetic and thermodynamic data. A deep understanding of thermo-optic effects, combined with robust methodological practices and advanced troubleshooting, is no longer optional but essential for reliable research and development. The future of temperature management in SPR points toward the wider adoption of intelligent, self-compensating sensor designs and the strategic use of multi-temperature experiments to deconvolute complex biological interactions. By systematically integrating these principles, researchers can significantly enhance the precision of their SPR assays, accelerating drug discovery and deepening our understanding of biomolecular mechanisms in biomedical and clinical research.

References

• 1. Advancements in surface plasmon resonance sensors for real ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/tc/d4tc04890c]
• 2. Detailed Modeling of Surface-Plasmon Resonance ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/25/3/894]
• 3. Optimizing drug discovery: Surface plasmon resonance ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667022423002530]
• 4. Simultaneous measurement of refractive index and ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30696142/]
• 5. High sensitivity photonic crystal fiber temperature and ... [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12648-023-02637-8]
• 6. Plasmonic Refractive Index and Temperature Sensor ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/20/7790]
• 7. Impact of the temperature on the interactions between ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-15215-5]
• 8. Recent Advances in Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10705257/]
• 9. Latest surface plasmon resonance advances for G protein- ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095177925001984]
• 10. System [https://www.sprpages.nl/best-results/artefacts/system]
• 11. Emerging Trends in Thermo-Optic and Electro-Optic Materials for Tunable Photonic Devices - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12195116/]
• 12. Thermo-Optic Coefficients - ScienceDirect [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780125444156501503]
• 13. Dispersion of thermo-optic coefficient of optical polymers - ScienceDirect [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0032386121006972]
• 14. Emerging Trends in Thermo‐Optic and Electro‐Optic Materials for Tunable Photonic Devices[v1] | Preprints.org [https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202505.0911]
• 15. An SPR-Based In Situ Methane Sensor for the Aqueous and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11485097/]
• 16. Surface plasmon resonance sensors: Temperature effects [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925346724010486]
• 17. Multi-temperature experiments to ease analysis of ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-18450-y]
• 18. Baseline drift [https://www.sprpages.nl/troubleshooting/baseline-drift]
• 19. Temperature Effects on DNA Chip Experiments from ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1779967/]
• 20. Surface Plasmon Resonance-Based Biodetection Systems [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11763797/]
• 21. Highly sensitive protein sensor based on surface plasmon ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S092596352401080X]
• 22. Investigating the Role of a Gold-Silver Alloy in a Metal- ... [https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025SenIm..26...87P/abstract]
• 23. Highly Sensitive TiO2/Au/Graphene Layer-Based Surface ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9405676/]
• 24. Surface plasmon resonance technology: Recent advances ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165993623001668]
• 25. Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) [https://cmi.hms.harvard.edu/surface-plasmon-resonance]
• 26. Top 10 tips for high quality SPR data | SPR Guide [https://nicoyalife.com/blog/spr-tips/top-10-tips-for-high-quality-spr-data/]
• 27. Temperature Influences the Interaction between SARS ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9607596/]
• 28. Impact of temperature on the affinity of SARS-CoV-2 Spike ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021925821009522]
• 29. Kinetic model of GPCR-G protein interactions reveals ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8904551/]
• 30. Direct comparison of binding equilibrium, thermodynamic, ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2373566/]
• 31. thermodynamic analysis in fragment-based drug discovery [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1740674910000533]
• 32. Van 't Hoff equation [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_%27t_Hoff_equation]
• 33. Probing the Kinetic and Thermodynamic Fingerprints of ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7344977/]
• 34. Electrochemical surface plasmon resonance based ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-99351-8]
• 35. Review Surface plasmon resonance biosensor chips [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0731708525003590]
• 36. Applications of Surface Plasmon Resonance in Heparan ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12191165/]
• 37. Research Advances on Fiber-Optic SPR Sensors with ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9860586/]
• 38. How does SPR work in Drug Discovery? [https://denovobiolabs.com/how-does-spr-work-in-drug-discovery/]
• 39. Thermal Stability Analysis of Surface Wave Assisted Bio ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6732/9/5/324]
• 40. Temperature-compensated no-core fiber sensor based on ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0263224125026077]
• 41. Temperature self-compensated double-hole optical fiber ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1068520025003736]
• 42. SPR Sensorgram Explained [https://www.affiniteinstruments.com/post/spr-sensorgram-explained]
• 43. Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) Troubleshooting Guide [https://knowledge.kactusbio.com/trouble-shooting-guide-for-surface-plasmon-resonance-spr]
• 44. Avoiding disturbances in sensorgrams [https://www.sprpages.nl/best-results/disturbances]
• 45. Data analysis for surface plasmon resonance sensors ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925400504006501]
• 46. Denoising Algorithm for High-Resolution and Large-Range ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12349586/]
• 47. Computational Tool for Curve Smoothing Methods Analysis ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5134/10/2/31]
• 48. Understanding and Controlling Non-Specific Binding in ... [https://www.amerigoscientific.com/resource-understanding-and-controlling-non-specific-binding-in-spr-experiments.html?srsltid=AfmBOorC85wkdBi7dV1KQ7gVoNefASNlx-VQ0gt6LpKgTZZNPSR09kOn]
• 49. Troubleshooting and Optimization Tips for SPR Experiments [https://www.creative-proteomics.com/resource/troubleshooting-optimization-tips-for-spr-experiments.htm]
• 50. Research Advances on Fiber-Optic SPR Sensors with ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/2/644]
• 51. Surface Plasmon Resonance kinetic analysis of the ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5988565/]
• 52. Advances in surface plasmon resonance for analyzing ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095177924000807]
• 53. Kinetic models [https://www.sprpages.nl/data-fitting/kinetic-models]
• 54. Temperature Sensor Based on Surface Plasmon Resonance ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9653889/]
• 55. A Novel Dual-Wavelength Method for Evaluating ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/19/9011]
• 56. Novel Optical Fiber-Based Structures for Plasmonics Sensors [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9688463/]
• 57. A novel surface plasmon resonance sensor sensitivity ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1569441023000500]
• 58. Accurate Correction of the “Bulk Response” in Surface ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9040059/]
• 59. Design and analysis of highly sensitive prism based ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666950122000074]
• 60. Wedged Fiber Optic Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9739012/]
• 61. Temperature-dependent sensitivity of surface plasmon ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925400508004450]
• 62. The Impact of Key SARS-CoV-2 RBD Mutations [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950363925000389]
• 63. SARS-CoV-2 spike mutations alter structure and energetics ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-15979-6]
• 64. Identification of temperature-insensitive residues in ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/ja/content/articlehtml/2025/cp/d5cp01710f]
• 65. Stoichiometric insights into SARS-CoV-2 spike–ACE2 ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2001037025002983]
• 66. computational optimization of SARS-CoV-2 RBD-targeting ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12391910/]
• 67. Grafting Strategies of Oxidation-Prone Coiled-Coil Peptides ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10413464/]
• 68. A Surface Plasmon Resonance‐Based Integrated Assay for ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12417749/]