Surface Ligand Engineering in Perovskite Quantum Dots: Controlling Electronic Properties for Advanced Biomedical and Clinical Applications

Abstract

This article comprehensively explores the pivotal role of surface ligand chemistry in determining the electronic and optoelectronic properties of perovskite quantum dots (PQDs). Tailored for researchers and drug development professionals, it details how the strategic design of capping ligands—from foundational passivation to advanced dual-ligand systems—governs charge transport, stability, and functionality. The discussion bridges fundamental synthesis and characterization methods with practical applications in sensing and diagnostics, addressing key challenges in optimization and validation. By synthesizing recent breakthroughs and established principles, this review provides a framework for leveraging ligand engineering to develop next-generation, high-performance PQD-based tools for biomedical research and clinical deployment.

The Molecular Foundation: How Surface Ligands Dictate PQD Electronic Structure and Stability

The Critical Role of Surface Passivation in Perovskite Quantum Dots

Perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) represent a revolutionary class of semiconducting materials with exceptional optoelectronic properties, including tunable bandgaps, high photoluminescence quantum yields, and superior defect tolerance. [1] However, the extensive surface-to-volume ratio of these nanoscale materials makes their electronic properties profoundly dependent on surface chemistry. The dynamic binding of inherent long-chain insulating ligands creates numerous surface defects that severely compromise photovoltaic performance by trapping charge carriers and inducing non-radiative recombination. [2] Surface passivation addresses these challenges by substituting insulating ligands with shorter, conductive counterparts and filling uncoordinated ionic sites, thereby enhancing electronic coupling between adjacent PQDs and improving charge transport throughout the solid film. [3]

The imperative for passivation stems from the fundamental synthesis process of PQDs. Colloidal synthesis utilizing long-chain oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OLA) ligands is essential for producing high-quality, monodispersed PQDs, but these very ligands become detrimental in final devices due to their insulating properties. [4] This creates a paradox where the ligands necessary for synthesis become impediments to performance, necessitating sophisticated post-synthetic ligand exchange strategies to transform electronically isolated PQDs into functionally connected solids capable of efficient charge transport for photovoltaic applications.

Key Challenges in PQD Surface Engineering

Incomplete Ligand Exchange and Surface Defects

Conventional ligand exchange processes using ester antisolvents like methyl acetate (MeOAc) face significant limitations. Under ambient conditions, these esters hydrolyze inefficiently, failing to generate adequate target ligands for complete surface coverage. [1] This results in the predominant dissociation of pristine insulating oleate ligands without sufficient substitution by conductive counterparts, creating extensive surface vacancy defects that capture charge carriers and reduce device performance. [1]

Structural Instability During Processing

The ionic nature of perovskite crystals makes them particularly vulnerable to polar solvents used in conventional ligand exchange processes. These solvents inevitably strip away not only surface-bound ligands but also essential metal cations and halides from the PQD surface. [4] This destructive process generates uncoordinated Pb²⁺ sites that act as non-radiative recombination centers and create penetration pathways for destructive environmental species like oxygen and water molecules, ultimately compromising both performance and operational stability.

Trade-offs Between Conductivity and Stability

A fundamental challenge in PQD surface engineering lies in balancing the enhanced electronic coupling achieved through shorter ligands against the improved environmental stability provided by more robust, longer ligands. While shorter ligands reduce inter-dot distance and improve charge transport, they often provide insufficient protection against environmental factors. Additionally, achieving homogeneous crystallographic orientations and minimal particle agglomeration during film assembly remains technically challenging, directly impacting the reproducibility and performance of PQD solar cells.

Advanced Passivation Strategies and Mechanisms

Alkaline-Augmented Antisolvent Hydrolysis

Recent breakthroughs demonstrate that creating alkaline environments during ligand exchange significantly enhances ester hydrolysis thermodynamics and kinetics. This approach renders ester hydrolysis thermodynamically spontaneous and lowers reaction activation energy by approximately nine-fold, enabling rapid substitution of pristine insulating oleate ligands with up to twice the conventional amount of hydrolyzed conductive counterparts. [1]

Experimental Protocol: The alkaline treatment involves tailoring potassium hydroxide (KOH) coupled with methyl benzoate (MeBz) antisolvent for interlayer rinsing of PQD solids. Specifically, hybrid FA₀.₄₇Cs₀.₅₃PbI₃ PQD solid films are rinsed with MeBz antisolvent containing controlled concentrations of KOH under ambient conditions (~30% relative humidity). This facilitates efficient hydrolysis of MeBz into benzoate ligands that replace pristine OA⁻ ligands while preserving perovskite core structural integrity. The resulting PQD light-absorbing layers exhibit fewer trap-states, homogeneous orientations, and minimal particle agglomerations. [1]

Consecutive Surface Matrix Engineering

The Consecutive Surface Matrix Engineering (CSME) strategy disrupts the dynamic equilibrium of proton exchange between OA and OAm by inducing an amidation reaction. This approach advances insulating ligand desorption from PQD surfaces while enabling short-chain conjugated ligands with high binding energy to efficiently occupy the resulting surface vacancies. [3]

Experimental Protocol: The CSME process involves treating FAPbI₃ PQD films with a solution containing short-chain conjugated ligands that preferentially bind to surface vacancy sites. This is followed by thermal annealing to promote amidation between residual OA and OAm, further enhancing ligand desorption and electronic coupling. The process significantly suppresses trap-assisted nonradiative recombination, enabling FAPbI₃ PQD solar cells to achieve record efficiencies of up to 19.14%. [3]

Nonpolar Solvent-Based Covalent Passivation

This innovative approach utilizes covalent short-chain triphenylphosphine oxide (TPPO) ligands dissolved in nonpolar solvents (e.g., octane) to passivate uncoordinated Pb²⁺ sites via strong Lewis acid-base interactions. The nonpolar solvent completely preserves PQD surface components while enabling effective trap passivation. [4]

Experimental Protocol: After conventional ligand exchange using ionic short-chain ligands in polar solvents, CsPbI₃ PQD solids are treated with TPPO ligand solution (1-2 mg/mL in octane) via spin-coating or immersion. The TPPO solution covalently coordinates with uncoordinated Pb²⁺ sites without damaging the PQD surface, followed by mild thermal treatment (60-70°C) to remove residual solvent. This approach simultaneously improves photovoltaic performance and ambient stability, with devices maintaining over 90% of initial efficiency after 18 days of storage under ambient conditions. [4]

Complementary Dual-Ligand Reconstruction

This strategy employs trimethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate and phenylethyl ammonium iodide to form a complementary dual-ligand system on the PQD surface through hydrogen bonds. This system stabilizes the surface lattice while maintaining good colloidal dispersion and improving inter-dot electronic coupling in PQD solids. [2]

Experimental Protocol: CsPbI₃ PQDs in solution are treated with sequential additions of trimethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate (0.1-0.3 mM) and phenylethylammonium iodide (0.2-0.4 mM) in anhydrous solvent with continuous stirring. The complementary ligands form a hydrogen-bonded network on the PQD surface, enhancing both optoelectronic properties and environmental stability. This approach has enabled a record efficiency of 17.61% in inorganic PQD solar cells. [2]

Table 1: Quantitative Performance Metrics of Advanced PQD Passivation Strategies

Passivation Strategy	PQD Composition	Certified PCE (%)	Stability Retention	Key Improvement Metrics
Alkaline-Augmented Antisolvent Hydrolysis [1]	FA₀.₄₇Cs₀.₅₃PbI₃	18.30 (certified)	Improved operational stability	2x ligand substitution; 9-fold reduced activation energy
Consecutive Surface Matrix Engineering [3]	FAPbI₃	19.14	Enhanced operation stability	Disrupted OA-OAm equilibrium; Reduced trap density
Nonpolar Solvent-Based Covalent Passivation [4]	CsPbI₃	15.40	>90% after 18 days	Strong Lewis acid-base coordination; Preserved surface components
Complementary Dual-Ligand Reconstruction [2]	CsPbI₃	17.61	Improved environmental stability	Hydrogen-bonded ligand network; Uniform stacking orientation

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 2: Key Research Reagents for PQD Surface Passivation Experiments

Reagent/Solution	Function in Passivation	Application Protocol
Methyl Benzoate (MeBz) Antisolvent	Medium-polarity ester that hydrolyzes to conductive benzoate ligands	Interlayer rinsing of PQD solid films under controlled humidity
Potassium Hydroxide (KOH)	Creates alkaline environment to enhance ester hydrolysis kinetics	Coupled with MeBz antisolvent at optimized concentrations
Triphenylphosphine Oxide (TPPO)	Covalent short-chain ligand for Lewis acid-base coordination with Pb²⁺ sites	Dissolved in nonpolar octane solvent (1-2 mg/mL) for post-treatment
Phenylethylammonium Iodide (PEAI)	Short-chain cationic ligand for replacing OLA ligands	Dissolved in ethyl acetate for A-site ligand exchange
Trimethyloxonium Tetrafluoroborate	Anionic component for complementary dual-ligand system	Sequential addition with PEAI for hydrogen-bonded surface network
Metal Salts (In³⁺, Zn²⁺, Cd²⁺)	Strips organic ligands and passivates Lewis basic sites	DMF solutions for phase transfer ligand exchange

Experimental Workflows and Mechanism Diagrams

The following diagram illustrates the strategic decision-making workflow for selecting appropriate PQD passivation methodologies based on specific research objectives and material constraints:

The molecular-level mechanism of PQD surface passivation is illustrated below, showing how different ligand systems interact with the perovskite crystal structure to enhance both performance and stability:

Surface passivation stands as an indispensable component in the development of high-performance PQD optoelectronic devices. The strategic replacement of pristine insulating ligands with carefully engineered conductive counterparts directly addresses the fundamental challenge of balancing charge transport with structural stability in PQD solids. Advanced passivation strategies, including alkaline-augmented hydrolysis, consecutive surface matrix engineering, nonpolar covalent passivation, and complementary dual-ligand systems, have collectively driven remarkable progress in PQD solar cell performance, with certified power conversion efficiencies now approaching 20%. [1] [3]

Future research directions will likely focus on developing multifunctional ligand systems that simultaneously address electronic, structural, and environmental stability challenges. The integration of in-situ characterization techniques to monitor passivation efficacy in real-time, coupled with machine learning approaches to design optimal ligand structures, represents a promising frontier. As understanding of PQD surface chemistry deepens, precise control over interfacial energetics and defect passivation will unlock the full potential of perovskite quantum dots for next-generation photovoltaic and optoelectronic applications.

Surface passivation represents a cornerstone technique in materials science and engineering, critical for mitigating performance-degrading defects in semiconductors and nanomaterials. Within the specific context of perovskite quantum dot (PQD) electronic properties research, this process is predominantly governed by the strategic application of surface ligands. These organic or inorganic molecules functionalize the nanomaterial surface, neutralizing electronically active defects known as dangling bonds. The ensuing modification of surface states within the band gap is paramount, as it directly dictates key electronic properties including charge carrier mobility, non-radiative recombination rates, and operational stability. A profound understanding of these mechanisms is not merely academic; it is the key to unlocking the full potential of PQDs in optoelectronic devices, from high-efficiency solar cells to next-generation light-emitting diodes. This guide provides an in-depth examination of the atomic-level mechanisms of surface passivation, detailing the specific interactions between ligands and defects, and presents the experimental methodologies essential for probing these critical interfaces.

Fundamental Defect Types and Passivation Principles

The Origin and Impact of Dangling Bonds

In any terminated crystalline or amorphous structure, a dangling bond is an unsatisfied valence on a surface atom that results from the abrupt interruption of the periodic lattice. These defects create electronic states within the forbidden band gap of the material, which act as traps for charge carriers. The trapping process facilitates non-radiative recombination—a primary loss mechanism in photovoltaic devices—and degrades charge transport properties by scattering mobile carriers. In perovskite quantum dots, which possess a high surface-to-volume ratio, the impact of these surface defects is profoundly magnified, making effective passivation not a mere enhancement but a fundamental requirement for functional devices [5].

Parallels in Amorphous Semiconductor Systems

The critical nature of defect passivation is vividly illustrated in hydrogenated amorphous silicon nitride (a-Si3N4), a material widely used in electronic devices. In this system, hydrogen plays a role analogous to surface ligands in QDs. Hydrogen atoms passivate both silicon and nitrogen dangling bonds, effectively "healing" coordination defects and purging the associated gap states. This restorative action enhances the material's dielectric properties. However, this role is multifaceted; the incorporation of hydrogen can also induce Si–N bond breaking, particularly in strained regions of the amorphous network, introducing new structural weaknesses. This duality underscores a universal principle in passivation: the healing agent must be carefully selected and controlled to avoid unintended detrimental effects on the host matrix [6].

Classification of Surface Ligands and Their Mechanisms

Surface ligands for PQDs can be systematically categorized based on their binding functional groups, which directly determine their passivation mechanism, binding strength, and resultant effect on the electronic structure of the nanomaterial [5].

Table 1: Classification of Common Surface Ligands by Functional Group

Functional Group	Example Ligands	Binding Target (Ion)	Primary Mechanism	Impact on Electronic Properties
Carboxylate	Oleic Acid	Pb²⁺	Coordinate covalent bond	Good passivation; can limit inter-dot coupling
Amine	Oleylamine	Halide (I⁻, Br⁻)	Dative covalent bond	Good passivation; can limit inter-dot coupling
Ammonium	Phenethylammonium Iodide (PEAI)	Anionic site (Halide)	Ionic bond / Lattice incorporation	Strong binding; can enhance stability and charge transport
Phosphate	-	Pb²⁺	Strong coordinate covalent bond	Enhanced stability; effective defect passivation
Sulfonate	-	Pb²⁺	Strong coordinate covalent bond	Enhanced stability; effective defect passivation

Monodentate and Bidentate Passivation

The coordination chemistry of the ligand-functional group interaction is a key determinant of passivation efficacy. Monodentate ligands, such as alkyl amines, bind to a single surface Pb²⁺ ion through a dative bond. While this neutralizes one dangling bond, the binding can be dynamic and relatively weak, leading to ligand desorption and defect regeneration. Bidentate ligands, featuring two coordinating atoms (e.g., in certain dicarboxylate species), can chelate a single Pb²⁺ ion or bridge two adjacent ions. This chelation effect results in significantly stronger binding constants and more robust, durable passivation of the surface [5].

The Complementary Dual-Ligand Mechanism

A sophisticated advancement in passivation strategy involves the use of multiple ligands that work synergistically. A prominent example is a system comprising trimethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate and phenylethyl ammonium iodide (PEAI). In this configuration, the ligands form a complementary dual-ligand system on the PQD surface through hydrogen bonds. This network creates a more complete and stable surface coverage, where one ligand species may passivate one type of defect (e.g., Pb²⁺ sites) while the other targets another (e.g., halide sites). This cooperation not only stabilizes the surface lattice but also improves inter-dot electronic coupling in solid films, leading to superior charge transport and record-high efficiencies in quantum dot solar cells [2].

Experimental Protocols for Ligand Studies and Passivation

Synthesis of Core-Shell Perovskite Quantum Dots

Objective: To synthesize MAPbBr₃@tetra-OAPbBr₃ core-shell PQDs for advanced in situ passivation studies [7].

Materials:

• Methylammonium bromide (MABr) and Lead(II) bromide (PbBr₂): Core precursor materials.
• Tetraoctylammonium bromide (t-OABr): Shell precursor.
• Oleylamine (OAm) and Oleic Acid (OA): Coordinating ligands to control growth and stabilize nanoparticles.
• Dimethylformamide (DMF) and Toluene: Solvents.

Methodology:

• Core Precursor Preparation: Dissolve 0.16 mmol MABr and 0.2 mmol PbBr₂ in 5 mL DMF. Add 50 µL OAm and 0.5 mL OA under continuous stirring.
• Shell Precursor Preparation: Dissolve 0.16 mmol t-OABr in 5 mL DMF using a separate vial, following the same protocol.
• Nanoparticle Growth: Heat 5 mL of toluene to 60°C in an oil bath with stirring.
• Core Injection: Rapidly inject 250 µL of the core precursor solution into the heated toluene, initiating the formation of MAPbBr₃ core nanoparticles.
• Shell Growth: Inject a controlled amount of the t-OABr-PbBr₃ shell precursor into the reaction mixture. The formation of core-shell nanoparticles is indicated by the emergence of a green color. Allow the reaction to proceed for 5 minutes.
• Purification: Transfer the solution to a centrifuge tube.
  • Centrifuge at 6000 rpm for 10 minutes. Discard the precipitate.
  • Subject the supernatant to a second centrifugation with isopropanol at 15,000 rpm for 10 minutes.
• Storage: Redisperse the final precipitate in chlorobenzene for subsequent applications [7].

In Situ Integration of PQDs for Bulk Perovskite Passivation

Objective: To incorporate pre-synthesized core-shell PQDs during the fabrication of a bulk perovskite film to passivate grain boundaries and surface defects [7].

Materials:

• Fabricated Core-Shell PQDs (from Protocol 4.1)
• Perovskite Precursors: PbI₂, FAI, PbBr₂, MACl, MABr
• Solvents: DMF, DMSO, Chlorobenzene (antisolvent)

Methodology:

• Substrate Preparation: Clean FTO/ITO substrates sequentially in soap solution, distilled water, ethanol, and acetone. Treat with UV-ozone for 15 minutes.
• Transport Layer Deposition: Deposit compact and mesoporous TiO₂ layers via spray pyrolysis and spin-coating, followed by annealing.
• Perovskite Film Fabrication with PQDs:
  • Prepare the standard perovskite precursor solution (e.g., 1.6 M PbI₂, 1.51 M FAI, etc., in DMF:DMSO).
  • Spin-coat the perovskite precursor onto the substrate.
  • During the antisolvent dripping step (critical for crystallization), use a chlorobenzene antisolvent containing the dispersed core-shell PQDs at an optimal concentration (e.g., 15 mg/mL).
• Annealing: Anneal the film to form the crystalline perovskite layer. The PQDs, introduced in situ, become integrated at grain boundaries and surfaces, epitaxially passivating defects.
• Device Completion: Subsequently deposit hole-transport and electrode layers to complete the solar cell device [7].

The following workflow diagram illustrates the key stages of the in situ passivation process:

Characterization Techniques for Assessing Passivation Efficacy

The success of a passivation strategy must be quantitatively evaluated through a suite of characterization techniques.

Table 2: Key Characterization Methods for Passivation Quality

Technique	Measured Parameter	Information on Passivation
Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY)	Efficiency of photon emission	Direct measure of non-radiative recombination suppression.
Time-Resolved Photoluminescence (TRPL)	Carrier lifetime	Quantifies trap density; longer lifetimes indicate better passivation.
FT-IR Spectroscopy	Vibrational modes of surface bonds	Confirms ligand binding and identifies functional groups present.
X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)	Surface elemental composition & bonding	Identifies chemical states of surface atoms and ligand attachment.
Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR)	Unpaired spin density	Directly probes the concentration of paramagnetic dangling bonds.
Solar Cell J-V Measurement	PCE, Voc, Jsc, FF	Device-level performance metrics impacted by reduced recombination.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Essential Reagents for PQD Surface Passivation Research

Reagent / Material	Function in Research	Example Use Case
Oleic Acid (OA)	Common coordination ligand for Pb²⁺ sites.	Colloidal stabilization and preliminary passivation during PQD synthesis [7].
Oleylamine (OAm)	Common passivation ligand for halide sites.	Colloidal stabilization and preliminary passivation during PQD synthesis [7].
Phenethylammonium Iodide (PEAI)	Ionic ammonium ligand for strong surface binding.	Used in complementary dual-ligand systems for enhanced stability and performance [2].
Trimethyloxonium Tetrafluoroborate	Reactive organo-oxygen compound.	Partner in hydrogen-bonded dual-ligand systems for surface reconstruction [2].
Tetraoctylammonium Bromide (t-OABr)	Bulky ammonium salt for shell formation.	Creating a wider-bandgap shell around PQD cores in core-shell architectures [7].
Lead Bromide (PbBr₂)	Source of Pb²⁺ ions.	Core and shell precursor; used to remedy lead-site surface defects.
Methylammonium Bromide (MABr)	Source of organic cation and halide.	Core precursor; can be used in ligand exchange for surface repair.

Visualization of Passivation Mechanisms

The following diagram synthesizes the core concepts of defect types and ligand passivation mechanisms discussed in this guide, illustrating how different ligands target specific surface defects on a perovskite quantum dot.

The deliberate passivation of surface defects is an indispensable unit operation in the fabrication of high-performance electronic and optoelectronic materials. The mechanisms—ranging from the simple coordination of a single monodentate ligand to the sophisticated synergy of a complementary dual-ligand system—provide a powerful toolkit for materials engineers. The experimental protocols and characterization methods outlined herein form the foundation for rigorous research in this domain. As the field progresses, the development of novel ligand chemistries and integration strategies, particularly those that enable robust, long-term stability under operational stresses, will be critical. Mastering these surface passivation mechanisms is a fundamental prerequisite for advancing the broader thesis on the role of surface ligands in determining the ultimate electronic properties and commercial viability of perovskite quantum dot technologies.

In the realm of colloidal nanotechnology, surface ligands are not merely passive stabilizers but active determinants of nanocrystal fate and function. These organic molecules covalently bound to nanocrystal surfaces dictate critical aspects of material behavior including colloidal stability, electronic properties, and application performance. For perovskite quantum dots (PQDs), ligand chemistry becomes particularly crucial due to the dynamic nature of their surfaces and heightened susceptibility to environmental degradation. Oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OLA) have emerged as the canonical ligand pair in PQD synthesis, forming the foundational chemical environment that enables precise nanocrystal growth and stabilization. Their amphiphilic character and complementary binding modes create a synergistic system that balances nucleation control with post-synthesis processability. This review examines the fundamental roles of OA and OLA in PQD technology, their inherent limitations, and advanced engineering strategies that build upon this classical chemistry to push the boundaries of optoelectronic performance.

Fundamental Chemistry of OA and OLA

Oleic acid and oleylamine represent two of the most ubiquitous ligands in colloidal nanocrystal synthesis, with their effectiveness stemming from their molecular structure and complementary binding functionalities.

• Molecular Structure & Binding Modes: OA (C₁₇H₃₃COOH) is a monounsaturated fatty acid featuring a carboxylic acid headgroup, while OLA (C₁₈H₃₅NH₂) is its amine-terminated counterpart. During perovskite quantum dot synthesis, the carboxylate group of OA coordinates with undercoordinated Pb²⁺ sites on the crystal surface, while the ammonium group of OLA (formed through protonation) interacts with halide anions, creating a balanced passivation system [8]. This acid-base pairing is not merely coincidental but functionally critical, as the two components work in concert to stabilize the ionic perovskite lattice.

• The OA:OLA Ratio as a Synthetic Control Knob: The relative concentration ratio of OA to OLA serves as a powerful parameter for dictating nanocrystal morphology and dimensionality. Research demonstrates that regulating the protonation behavior of OLA and the competitive lattice-forming behavior between oleylammonium cations and cesium ions directly influences dimensional outcomes [8]. By precisely tuning the OA/OLA feed ratio, synthesis can be directed toward either two-dimensional nanoplatelets or three-dimensional nanocubes, enabling spectral control over optical properties without changing material composition.

Table 1: Fundamental Properties of Common Ligands in PQD Synthesis

Ligand	Chemical Formula	Head Group	Primary Binding Site	Role in Synthesis
Oleic Acid (OA)	C₁₇H₃₃COOH	Carboxylic acid	Pb²⁺ ions	Surface passivation, growth control
Oleylamine (OLA)	C₁₈H₃₅NH₂	Amine	Halide ions (I⁻, Br⁻)	Charge balance, colloidal stability
Octylphosphonic Acid (OPA)	C₈H₁₇PO(OH)₂	Phosphonic acid	Pb²⁺ ions	Defect passivation, conductivity enhancement
Succinic Acid (SA)	C₄H₆O₄	Dicarboxylic acid	Pb²⁺ ions	Bidentate binding, water compatibility

Experimental Protocols in Ligand Engineering

Standard Hot-Injection Synthesis with OA/OLA

The hot-injection method represents the most widely employed approach for producing high-quality CsPbX₃ perovskite quantum dots with narrow size distributions. The following protocol outlines the key steps:

• Precursor Preparation: Combine cesium carbonate (Cs₂CO₃, 2.49 mmol) with oleic acid (2.5 mL) and 1-octadecene (ODE, 30.0 mL) in a three-neck flask. Degas and dry under vacuum for 1 hour at 120°C, then heat to 150°C under N₂ until complete dissolution to form cesium oleate [9].

• Reaction Mixture Setup: In a separate flask, combine lead precursor (e.g., PbI₂ for CsPbI₃) with ODE, OA, and OLA. The typical OA:OLA ratio ranges from 1:1 to 1:2 for optimal cubic phase stabilization. Degas the mixture under vacuum at 120°C for 30-60 minutes to remove residual water and oxygen [10].

• Quantum Dot Formation: Rapidly inject the cesium oleate precursor into the reaction flask maintained at 170°C. The reaction temperature critically determines nucleation and growth kinetics, with 170°C identified as optimal for CsPbI₃ PQDs exhibiting maximum photoluminescence intensity and narrowest emission linewidth [10].

• Purification and Isolation: After 5-10 seconds of reaction, rapidly cool the mixture in an ice bath. Centrifuge the crude solution with antisolvents (typically ethyl acetate or acetone) to precipitate the quantum dots. Carefully decant the supernatant and redisperse the pellet in non-polar solvents like hexane or toluene [10] [9].

Ligand Exchange and Modification Techniques

While OA and OLA excel during synthesis, their long aliphatic chains (C18) impede charge transport in solid-state films, necessitating post-synthetic ligand engineering:

• Partial Ligand Exchange: Introduce short-chain ligands during or after synthesis to partially replace OA/OLA. For instance, the addition of octylphosphonic acid (OPA, C8) during synthesis creates a mixed-ligand system that enhances electrical conductivity from 5.3×10⁻⁴ to 1.1×10⁻³ S/m while maintaining colloidal stability [9].

• Bidentate Ligand Strategies: Replace monodentate OA with bidentate ligands like succinic acid (SA) featuring two carboxylic acid groups. This creates stronger coordination with the perovskite surface through the chelate effect, significantly improving photoluminescence quantum yield and water stability [11].

• Complementary Dual-Ligand Systems: Implement advanced resurfacing approaches using complementary ligand pairs that form hydrogen-bonded networks around the quantum dots. Systems incorporating trimethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate and phenylethyl ammonium iodide demonstrate improved inter-dot electronic coupling while maintaining good dispersion [2].

Quantitative Analysis of Ligand Effects

The impact of ligand engineering on PQD performance can be systematically quantified through key optoelectronic metrics. Research demonstrates that strategic ligand modification significantly enhances device performance.

Table 2: Performance Metrics of PQDs with Different Ligand Systems

Ligand System	PLQY (%)	Conductivity (S/m)	Device Performance	Stability (PL Retention)
Conventional OA/OLA	71.9	5.3 × 10⁻⁴	Baseline	<50% after 7 days
OPA Modification	98	1.1 × 10⁻³	LED: 12.6% EQE, 10171 cd m⁻²	Not reported
TOP/TOPO Passivation	16-18% enhancement	Not reported	Not reported	>70% after 20 days UV
L-Phenylalanine	3% enhancement	Not reported	Not reported	Superior photostability
Complementary Dual-Ligand	Not reported	Improved inter-dot coupling	Solar cell: 17.61% efficiency	Enhanced environmental stability

The data reveal several significant trends. First, the implementation of shorter-chain ligands like OPA substantially improves charge transport characteristics, as evidenced by the approximate doubling of film conductivity compared to conventional OA/OLA systems [9]. Second, alternative binding groups such as phosphonic acids (TOP, TOPO) and amino acids (L-phenylalanine) provide superior surface passivation, reducing non-radiative recombination pathways and enhancing photoluminescence quantum yield [10]. Third, advanced multi-ligand architectures enable simultaneous optimization of multiple properties, addressing the traditional trade-off between operational stability and electronic performance [2].

Advanced Ligand Engineering Strategies

Short-Chain Ligands for Enhanced Charge Transport

The insulating nature of long-chain OA and OLA ligands (approximately 2 nm chain length) creates significant barriers to inter-dot charge transport in solid-state films. To address this limitation, researchers have developed strategic ligand exchange approaches that introduce shorter-chain alternatives while maintaining adequate surface passivation:

• Organic Phosphonic Acids: The substitution of OA with octylphosphonic acid (OPA) demonstrates the multifaceted benefits of short-chain ligands. OPA's phosphonic acid group forms a stronger coordinate bond with undercoordinated Pb²⁺ surface sites compared to carboxylic acids, leading to more effective defect passivation and remarkable PLQY values up to 98% [9]. Simultaneously, its shorter hydrocarbon chain (C8 vs C18) reduces inter-dot spacing, enhancing film conductivity from 5.3×10⁻⁴ to 1.1×10⁻³ S/m.

• Inorganic Ligands: Beyond organic alternatives, inorganic ligands like halide salts (e.g., NH₄I) and pseudohalides provide ultracompact passivation layers that dramatically enhance inter-dot electronic coupling. These inorganic species create essentially ligand-free quantum dot surfaces with near-atomic contact between adjacent nanocrystals, enabling charge mobility values orders of magnitude higher than conventional OA/OLA-capped systems.

Multidentate Ligands for Enhanced Stability

The monodentate binding character of OA and OLA creates dynamic ligand binding with relatively low activation energies for desorption, leading to progressive surface degradation under operational conditions. Multidentate ligand strategies address this fundamental limitation:

• Dicarboxylic Acid Systems: Ligands such as succinic acid (SA) featuring two carboxylic acid groups enable bidentate coordination with the perovskite surface. This chelate effect creates significantly more stable binding configurations, as demonstrated by theoretical calculations showing stronger binding energies compared to monodentate OA [11]. The improved binding affinity translates directly to enhanced environmental stability, particularly in aqueous environments.

• Biomolecule Conjugation: The inherent limitations of OA/OLA become particularly pronounced in biological applications. Research shows that replacing OA/OLA with succinic acid enables subsequent functionalization with N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) esters, creating reactive intermediates for biomolecular conjugation [11]. This approach facilitates the development of PQD-bioconjugates for sensing applications, achieving detection limits of 51.47 nM for bovine serum albumin while maintaining quantum dot stability in aqueous media.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Successful ligand engineering in perovskite quantum dots requires careful selection of chemical reagents and analytical tools. The following table summarizes key components for advanced ligand studies:

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for PQD Ligand Engineering

Reagent Category	Specific Examples	Function/Purpose	Key Considerations
Standard Ligands	Oleic acid (OA), Oleylamine (OLA)	Baseline synthesis, colloidal stability	Purification to remove oxidation products; optimal OA:OLA ratio critical
Short-Chain Ligands	Octylphosphonic acid (OPA), Octanoic acid (OTAc)	Enhanced charge transport, defect passivation	Balance between chain length and solubility; binding group affinity
Multidentate Ligands	Succinic acid (SA), Ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA)	Improved binding stability, water compatibility	Chelate effect strength; potential for bridge bonding between QDs
Precision Additives	Trioctylphosphine (TOP), Trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO)	Surface defect passivation	Coordination with undercoordinated Pb²⁺ ions; 16-18% PL enhancement [10]
Amino Acid Ligands	L-phenylalanine, L-glutamic acid	Environmentally friendly alternatives, chiral properties	Steric effects of side chains; binding group availability
Purification Solvents	Hexane, Toluene, Ethyl acetate, Acetone	QD isolation, ligand excess removal	Polarity matching for precipitation; solvent quality for redispersion

The chemistry of oleic acid and oleylamine represents both the foundation and frontier of perovskite quantum dot research. While their role as synthetic workhorses is firmly established, contemporary research has illuminated both their limitations and pathways to transcend them. The future of PQD ligand engineering lies in rational design strategies that move beyond single-ligand systems to multi-component, functionally integrated approaches. Promising directions include dynamic ligand systems that adapt to environmental conditions, computationally guided ligand discovery that predicts binding affinities and electronic effects, and bio-inspired approaches that mimic the sophisticated ligand management found in natural photosynthetic systems. As these advanced ligand paradigms mature, they will unlock the full potential of perovskite quantum dots across optoelectronics, photovoltaics, and biomedical applications, transforming these nanoscale materials from laboratory curiosities into technological mainstays.

Surface ligands are integral to the structure and function of perovskite quantum dots (PQDs), serving not merely as passive stabilizing agents but as active determinants of their fundamental electronic characteristics. Within the context of advanced materials research for optoelectronics, the strategic engineering of ligand chemistry provides a powerful pathway to control core behaviors such as charge carrier mobility, band structure, and successful dopant integration. This whitepaper synthesizes recent scientific advances to elucidate the profound impact of ligand selection and modification on these key properties, providing a technical guide for researchers and scientists aiming to optimize PQD performance for applications in photovoltaics, light-emitting diodes (LEDs), and other quantum dot-based devices. The ensuing sections will detail the specific mechanisms of influence, supported by quantitative data and experimental methodologies.

The Influence of Ligands on Band Gap and Exciton Dynamics

Ligands directly impact the electronic structure of PQDs, notably through surface chemistry that alters the density and localization of charge carriers. The band gap itself can be influenced indirectly through ligand-induced lattice strain and dimensionality changes, but the most direct electronic effects are observed in exciton relaxation and recombination dynamics.

Research on CdSe quantum dots has demonstrated that the presence of surface ligands, such as trimethylphosphine oxide or methylamine, significantly increases the rate of photoexcitation relaxation. The extensive hybridization between the electronic states of the quantum dot and the ligand molecules creates an efficient nonradiative relaxation channel, facilitating rapid exciton relaxation and electronic energy loss [12].

Furthermore, the modification of surface chemistry dictates how ligand bonding behaves in the excited states of the nanocrystals. Transient mid-IR absorption spectroscopy studies on PbS QDs reveal that the excited-state bonding is highly ligand-dependent. In oleate-passivated QDs, the overall Pb-O coordination decreases in the excitonic excited state, indicating a net weakening of ligand bonding. In contrast, for QDs passivated with 3-mercaptopropionic acid (MPA)—a ligand featuring both thiol and carboxylate anchoring groups—the localization of hole density near the thiol groups causes a uniform shift in the carboxylate vibrational features, signifying a change in surface charge density. This altered surface charge directly affects the energy and electron transfer processes at the nanocrystal surface, which are crucial for photocatalytic activity [13].

Ligand Engineering for Enhanced Charge Carrier Mobility

A primary challenge in PQD technology is the inherent trade-off between colloidal stability, provided by long-chain insulating ligands, and efficient charge transport, which requires shorter, conductive pathways. Ligand engineering strategies are pivotal in overcoming this bottleneck, directly influencing device performance in photovoltaics and LEDs.

Short-Chain Ligands and Conjugated Molecules

Table 1: Impact of Ligand Engineering on Charge Mobility and Device Performance

Ligand Strategy	Material System	Key Effect on Mobility/Conductivity	Resulting Device Performance
Short-chain MPA/FAI exchange [14]	FAPbI₃ PQDs	Reduces inter-dot spacing, improves thin-film conductivity	28% improvement in solar cell power conversion efficiency (PCE)
Conjugated PPABr ligands [15]	CsPbBr₃ PQDs	Enhances carrier mobility via π-π stacking and electron delocalization	LED External Quantum Efficiency (EQE) of 18.67% (up to 23.88% with light extraction)
Short-chain ThPABr ligand [15]	CsPbBr₃ PQDs (Control)	Provides a baseline for carrier transport	Serves as a reference for conjugated ligand improvements

Replacing long-chain insulating ligands like oleylamine (OAm) and oleic acid (OA) with shorter alternatives is a common approach. A sequential solid-state multiligand exchange process for FAPbI₃ PQDs, replacing octylamine (OctAm) and OA with a hybrid of 3-mercaptopropionic acid (MPA) and formamidinium iodide (FAI), demonstrated a significant enhancement in photovoltaic device performance. This process removed ~85% of the original long-chain ligands, which reduced inter-dot spacing and defects, thereby boosting the current density and achieving a 28% improvement in power conversion efficiency [14].

Beyond simple chain length reduction, the use of conjugated ligands presents a more advanced strategy. Short-chain conjugated ligands based on 3-phenyl-2-propen-1-amine bromide (PPABr) leverage their π-π stacking capability and delocalized electron clouds to create efficient pathways for charge transport between QDs. The electronic properties of these ligands can be finely tuned with substituents; for instance, electron-donating groups (e.g., -CH₃) enhance hole transport, while electron-withdrawing groups (e.g., -F) can improve electron transport. This modulation addresses carrier transport imbalance in devices, leading to a dramatic increase in the external quantum efficiency of light-emitting diodes [15].

Experimental Protocol: Sequential Solid-State Ligand Exchange

The following workflow, detailed for FAPbI₃ PQDs, outlines a robust method for enhancing thin-film conductivity [14]:

Title: Solid-State Ligand Exchange Workflow

Key Steps:

• Synthesis: FAPbI₃ colloidal QDs are synthesized via a modified ligand-assisted reprecipitation (LARP) method using PbI₂ and FAI precursors in acetonitrile, with OctAm and OA as initial capping ligands.
• Liquid Purification: Methyl acetate (MeOAc) is added to the colloidal solution in varying volumes (e.g., 1, 3, 5 mL). The solution is centrifuged, and the supernatant containing excess ligands and precursors is discarded.
• Solid Purification: The remaining sediment is redispersed in chloroform and centrifuged at a lower speed to remove large, agglomerated particles, yielding purified PQDs.
• Ligand Exchange: A solution of 3-mercaptopropionic acid (MPA) and formamidinium iodide (FAI) in MeOAc is used to treat the spin-coated PQD films, replacing the remaining long-chain ligands.
• Validation: Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (¹H NMR) spectroscopy is used to quantitatively confirm the removal of original ligands and the successful passivation with MPA and FAI.

Ligands as a Tool for Controlled Doping and Lattice Engineering

Ligands play a surprisingly active role in facilitating the incorporation of dopant ions into the PQD lattice and in driving structural transformations that directly affect electronic energy transfer processes.

Enhancing Nd³⁺ Doping Efficiency

In the pursuit of pure blue-emitting PQDs, neodymium (Nd³⁺) doping of CsPb(Cl/Br)₃ QDs is an effective strategy. However, the presence of surface halide and cesium vacancies often limits doping efficiency and photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY). A ligand exchange process using 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTMS) was found to effectively repair these surface vacancies. This passivation step enhances the subsequent incorporation of Nd³⁺ into the perovskite lattice, leading to a dramatic increase in PLQY, achieving up to 94% at 466 nm for blue emission. The APTMS ligand not only improves optical efficiency but also contributes to greater photostability [16].

Driving Multiphase Formation for White Emission

Ligands can also be utilized to engineer the perovskite lattice dimensionality to create single-emitter white-light quantum dots. A two-step process involving Mn²⁺ doping followed by ligand exchange with short alkylammonium ligands like isopropylammonium bromide (IPABr) can induce a controlled transformation of the crystal structure.

Table 2: Ligands in Doping and Lattice Engineering

Ligand Function	Ligand Example	Material System	Impact on Electronic Properties
Doping Enhancement [16]	APTMS (silane)	Nd-CsPb(Cl/Br)₃ PQDs	Repairs surface vacancies, enables high Nd³⁺ doping, boosts blue PLQY to 94%
Lattice Dimensionality Control [17]	IPABr (alkylammonium)	Mn-CsPb(Cl/Br)₃ PQDs	Drives formation of 0D-3D composite phases, tuning exciton energy transfer to Mn²⁺ for white light
Defect Passivation [10]	TOPO, L-PHE	CsPbI₃ PQDs	Coordinates with undercoordinated Pb²⁺, suppresses non-radiative recombination, enhances PL intensity and stability

This ligand exchange thermodynamically tunes the perovskite's emission profile. The strong interaction between short alkylammonium ligands and the perovskite surface can drive the formation of a mixed-dimensional composite, such as a 0D-3D structure. This transformation is crucial because it modifies the charge carriers' localization and the strength of exciton-phonon coupling within the lattice. These changes directly influence the efficiency of energy transfer from the perovskite excited state to the Mn²⁺ dopant ions, enabling the calibration of both excitonic and Mn²⁺ d-d emission to achieve a balanced white light profile [17].

The diagram below illustrates the mechanism of ligand-enhanced doping.

Title: Ligand-Enhanced Doping Mechanism

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents for Ligand Engineering

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Ligand Studies

Reagent / Material	Function in Ligand Engineering	Example Application
3-Mercaptopropionic Acid (MPA)	Short-chain bidentate ligand (thiol & carboxylate); improves charge transport and influences excited-state surface charge [14] [13].	Photovoltaic devices for solid-state ligand exchange [14].
Formamidinium Iodide (FAI)	Simultaneously acts as A-site cation source and short ligand; helps maintain perovskite structure during exchange [14].	Hybrid MPA/FAI passivation for FAPbI₃ PQDs [14].
Conjugated Amines (e.g., PPABr)	Short-chain ligands with π-conjugated backbone; enhance inter-dot carrier mobility via π-π stacking [15].	High-efficiency perovskite QLEDs [15].
Alkylammonium Salts (e.g., IPABr)	Drive halide exchange and lattice dimensionality transformation; tune energy transfer to dopants [17].	Fabrication of white-light single-emitter PQDs [17].
Silane Molecules (e.g., APTMS)	Strongly binds to surface vacancies; enhances doping efficiency and photostability [16].	Repairing Cs/halide vacancies in blue-emitting Nd-doped PQDs [16].
Trioctylphosphine Oxide (TOPO)	Passivates undercoordinated Pb²⁺ ions on the PQD surface; reduces non-radiative recombination [10].	Improving PLQY and stability of CsPbI₃ PQDs [10].
Deep Eutectic Solvent (DES)	Multi-component ligand system forming a hydrogen-bonding network; enhances passivation and PL intensity [18].	Synthesizing high-luminance PQDs for bright LEDs [18].

The strategic selection and application of surface ligands is a cornerstone of modern perovskite quantum dot research, offering precise control over the fundamental electronic properties that dictate device performance. As evidenced by recent studies, moving beyond traditional long-chain ligands to sophisticated short-chain, conjugated, and multi-functional ligands directly enhances charge carrier mobility by reducing inter-dot barriers and creating efficient conduction pathways. Furthermore, ligands are indispensable tools for enabling high-efficiency doping and band gap engineering through defect passivation and controlled lattice manipulation. The experimental protocols and reagent toolkit outlined in this whitepaper provide a foundation for researchers to continue advancing the field, ultimately driving the development of more efficient, stable, and high-performance optoelectronic devices.

The surface area-to-volume ratio (SA:V) is a fundamental principle that distinguishes nanomaterials from their bulk counterparts. As material dimensions shrink to the nanoscale (1-100 nm), the surface area increases exponentially relative to volume [19]. For spherical perovskite quantum dots (PQDs), this relationship is defined mathematically as SA:V = 6/r, where r is the particle radius [19]. This geometric reality means that a dramatically larger fraction of atoms in PQDs reside at the surface, making these surface atoms dominant in determining the material's properties, stability, and functionality [20] [19].

This whitepaper examines how the exceptionally high SA:V ratio of PQDs necessitates careful surface ligand management to control optoelectronic properties, stabilize the ionic crystal structure, and enable advanced applications in sensing, photovoltaics, and biomedicine. We explore the fundamental ligand-PQD interactions, present quantitative data on ligand effects, and provide detailed methodologies for implementing ligand engineering strategies in research settings.

The Geometric Imperative: Surface Area to Volume Ratio in PQDs

The high SA:V ratio of PQDs creates both extraordinary opportunities and significant challenges. With particle sizes typically ranging from 5-20 nm, PQDs exhibit quantum confinement effects that enable size-tunable bandgaps and intense, narrow photoluminescence with quantum yields reaching 50-90% [21] [22]. However, this same characteristic creates a high energy, reactive surface where undercoordinated ions are susceptible to environmental degradation [22].

Table 1: Impact of Decreasing PQD Size on Surface Area to Volume Ratio

Particle Radius (nm)	Surface Area (SA)	Volume (V)	SA:V Ratio	Implications for Surface Management
10	1200 nm²	4000 nm³	0.3	Moderate surface dominance
5	600 nm²	500 nm³	1.2	High surface reactivity
2	240 nm²	32 nm³	7.5	Extreme surface dominance

The relationship illustrated in Table 1 demonstrates why surface management becomes progressively more critical as PQD dimensions decrease. The large surface area provides numerous active sites for chemical reactions and functionalization, but simultaneously makes the material inherently unstable without proper passivation [19]. This geometric imperative establishes why ligand chemistry is not merely a synthetic consideration but a fundamental determinant of PQD viability.

Ligand Functions: Beyond Simple Stabilization

Surface ligands perform multiple critical functions that address the challenges posed by high SA:V ratios:

Structural and Electronic Stabilization

Ligands passivate undercoordinated surface atoms, particularly Pb²⁺ ions, preventing structural degradation and non-radiative recombination [11] [23]. Short-chain dicarboxylic acids like succinic acid (SA) demonstrate stronger binding to perovskite surfaces compared to conventional oleic acid, significantly improving fluorescence and stability [11]. Multidentate ligands provide enhanced stabilization through the chelate effect, where multiple binding points create more durable surface attachment [11].

Charge Transport Modulation

The insulating nature of long-chain hydrocarbon ligands (e.g., oleic acid, oleylamine) creates barriers to inter-dot charge transport [22] [20]. Ligand engineering strategies replace these insulating ligands with shorter organic or inorganic alternatives, reducing interparticle distance from >2nm to <1nm and dramatically improving conductivity in PQD films [20] [1].

Application-Specific Functionalization

Ligands enable PQD integration into diverse applications. For biological sensing, ligands like N-Hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) create ester groups that facilitate bioconjugation to proteins such as bovine serum albumin (BSA) [11]. In photovoltaic devices, conductive ligands such as formamidinium iodide and guanidinium thiocyanate enhance dot-to-dot electronic coupling while passivating surface defects [22].

Quantitative Evidence: Ligand Impact on PQD Properties

Research demonstrates measurable improvements in PQD performance through strategic ligand engineering:

Table 2: Performance Metrics of PQDs with Different Surface Ligands

Ligand Type	Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY)	Stability Improvement	Key Findings	Application Context
Succinic Acid (SA)	Significant improvement over OA-capped QDs [11]	Enhanced water stability [11]	Stronger binding to perovskite surface; better electronic coupling [11]	Aqueous bio-sensing [11]
Trioctylphosphine Oxide (TOPO)	18% increase in PL intensity [23]	Not specified	Effective passivation of undercoordinated Pb²⁺ ions [23]	Optoelectronic devices [23]
L-Phenylalanine (L-PHE)	3% increase in PL intensity [23]	>70% initial PL intensity after 20 days UV exposure [23]	Superior photostability [23]	Long-term optical applications [23]
Alkaline-Treated Short Ligands	Not specified	Improved storage and operational stability [1]	Fewer trap-states, minimal agglomeration [1]	Photovoltaics (18.3% certified efficiency) [1]

The data in Table 2 confirms that ligand selection directly influences key PQD performance metrics. The enhancement mechanisms vary from improved electronic coupling to defect passivation, with different ligands offering distinct advantages for specific application contexts.

Ligand Binding Dynamics and Classification

Understanding ligand-PQD interactions requires examining both binding mechanisms and ligand categorization:

Binding Coordination Chemistry

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) studies of PbS QDs reveal complex ligand binding beyond simple two-state (bound/free) models [24]. Three distinct ligand states exist: strongly bound oleate (OA) on Pb-rich (111) facets (X-type binding), weakly coordinated oleic acid (OAH) on (100) facets through acidic headgroups (L-type binding), and free ligands in solution [24]. This dynamic equilibrium influences exchange processes and surface coverage, which typically reaches 3.9 ligands/nm² [24].

Ligand Classification Framework

• X-type ligands: Anionic ligands (carboxylates, thiolates) that compensate for excess cationic charge by donating one electron to surface metal cations [24]
• L-type ligands: Neutral two-electron donors (amines, phosphines, carboxylic acids) that coordinate without affecting QD charge [24]
• Z-type ligands: Neutral two-electron acceptors that coordinate to surface chalcogen anions, typically classified as metal complexes [24]

The following diagram illustrates the multifaceted roles that ligands play in managing the high SA:V ratio in PQDs:

Experimental Protocols: Ligand Engineering Methodologies

Objective: Render CsPbBr₃ PQDs water-compatible for biomolecule sensing via ligand exchange.

Materials:

• CsPbBr₃ PQDs capped with oleic acid/oleylamine
• Dicarboxylic acid ligands: succinic acid (SA), folic acid (FA), EDTA, glutamic acid (GA)
• N-Hydroxysuccinimide (NHS)
• Toluene, ethyl acetate, double-distilled water
• Bovine serum albumin (BSA) as model protein

Procedure:

• Synthesize CsPbBr₃ PQDs using established protocols with OA/OLA ligands
• Precipitate PQDs from toluene using ethyl acetate as antisolvent
• Redisperse purified PQDs in toluene containing dicarboxylic acid ligands (SA, FA, EDTA, or GA)
• Stir mixture for 4-6 hours at room temperature to facilitate ligand exchange
• Precipitate ligand-exchanged PQDs, remove supernatant with released OA ligands
• For bioconjugation: React SA-treated PQDs with NHS in aqueous medium to form NHS ester
• Add BSA protein to NHS-activated PQDs for bioconjugation via amide linkage

Characterization:

• UV-Vis and PL spectroscopy confirm retention of optical properties
• FTIR spectroscopy validates ligand exchange
• TEM analysis verifies crystal structure preservation
• Detection limit quantification for BSA sensing (achieved 51.47 nM)

Objective: Enhance conductive ligand capping on PQD surfaces for improved photovoltaics.

Materials:

• FA₀.₄₇Cs₀.₅₃PbI₃ PQDs with pristine OA/OAm ligands
• Methyl benzoate (MeBz) antisolvent
• Potassium hydroxide (KOH)
• 2-pentanol (2-PeOH) as solvent for cationic salts

Procedure:

• Prepare hybrid FA₀.₄₇Cs₀.₅₃PbI₃ PQDs via post-synthetic cation exchange
• Spin-coat PQD colloids into solid films
• Establish alkaline environment by adding KOH to MeBz antisolvent
• Rinse PQD solid films with alkaline MeBz solution under ambient humidity (~30% RH)
• Control alkalinity concentration to balance ligand exchange and structural integrity
• Perform subsequent A-site cationic ligand exchange using 2-PeOH as solvent
• Assemble PQD layers via layer-by-layer deposition with interlayer rinsing

Characterization:

• DFT calculations reveal ester hydrolysis becomes thermodynamically spontaneous
• Activation energy reduced approximately 9-fold versus conventional ester hydrolysis
• Achieved ~2× conventional amount of hydrolyzed conductive ligands
• Certified solar cell efficiency of 18.3% with minimal particle agglomeration

The following diagram illustrates the experimental workflow for ligand exchange and its impact on PQD properties:

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Reagents for PQD Ligand Engineering Research

Reagent Category	Specific Examples	Function	Research Context
Native Ligands	Oleic acid (OA), Oleylamine (OLA)	Initial stabilization during synthesis; provide colloidal stability [11] [22]	Standard synthesis of pristine PQDs
Short-Chain Organic Ligands	Succinic acid, Glutamic acid, L-Phenylalanine	Replace long-chain ligands; reduce interparticle distance; improve charge transport [11] [23]	Aqueous compatibility; environmental stability
Conductive Ligands	Formamidinium iodide, Guanidinium thiocyanate, Acetate salts	Enhance inter-dot electronic coupling; passivate surface defects [22] [1]	Photovoltaic applications
Polymeric Ligands	PMMA, PS, PEG, Block copolymers	Form protective matrices; create tailored porosity [11] [20]	Environmental protection; sensor films
Inorganic Ligands	Halides (I⁻, Cl⁻, Br⁻), Metal chalcogenide complexes	Create all-inorganic capping; superior conductivity [20]	Electronic devices
Bioconjugation Ligands	N-Hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), Folic acid	Enable covalent bonding to biomolecules [11]	Biosensing; targeted delivery
Antisolvents	Methyl benzoate, Methyl acetate, Ethyl acetate	Facilitate ligand exchange during purification; induce precipitation [1]	Film processing; purification

The high surface area-to-volume ratio of perovskite quantum dots represents both their greatest asset and most significant challenge. Through strategic ligand engineering, researchers can transform this potential vulnerability into a design advantage, precisely tuning PQD properties for specific applications. The methodologies and data presented herein demonstrate that comprehensive understanding and control of surface chemistry is indispensable for harnessing the full potential of PQDs in advanced technologies ranging from ultrasensitive biosensors to high-efficiency photovoltaics. As research advances, continued innovation in ligand design will undoubtedly unlock new frontiers in nanomaterial science and application.

Synthesis and Implementation: Ligand Engineering Strategies for Enhanced PQD Performance

The synthesis of perovskite nanocrystals (PNCs) has emerged as a critical research domain, with Hot-Injection (HI) and Ligand-Assisted Reprecipitation (LARP) standing as two predominant methodologies. Within the broader context of surface ligand research, these synthesis strategies represent more than mere procedural alternatives; they constitute fundamentally different approaches to manipulating surface chemistry that directly dictate the final electronic properties of the quantum-confined systems. Surface ligands serve as dynamic interfaces that passivate undercoordinated surface atoms, suppress non-radiative recombination, and ultimately determine the optoelectronic fate of the nanocrystals [25] [10]. The choice between HI and LARP protocols intrinsically determines the ligand binding dynamics, surface defect density, and colloidal stability, thereby positioning synthesis methodology as a primary variable in the pursuit of tailored PNC electronic characteristics. This technical analysis provides a comprehensive comparison of these core methods, focusing specifically on their mechanistic implications for surface chemistry and the resulting functional properties of CsPbBr3 and CsPbI3 PNCs, with direct relevance to optoelectronic applications including photovoltaics, light-emitting diodes, and advanced biosensors [26] [27].

Methodological Fundamentals and Mechanisms

Hot-Injection (HI) Synthesis

The hot-injection method is a heat-driven precipitation technique conducted at elevated temperatures in non-aqueous, organic solvents. This approach involves the rapid injection of precursor compounds into a high-temperature reaction flask containing coordinating solvents and ligands, triggering instantaneous nucleation and subsequent controlled growth of nanocrystals [25] [28]. The synthesis of CsPbBr3 or CsPbI3 PNCs via HI typically employs a reaction medium of 1-octadecene with oleylamine and oleic acid as primary surface ligands, with temperatures precisely controlled between 140–180°C [10]. The high-temperature environment provides sufficient thermal energy to overcome kinetic barriers, facilitating the formation of highly crystalline structures with excellent optical properties. The protocol necessitates an oxygen-free environment, typically achieved through Schlenk line techniques, and offers exceptional control over nanocrystal size through manipulation of temperature, reaction duration, and ligand concentration [28].

Ligand-Assisted Reprecipitation (LARP)

In contrast, Ligand-Assisted Reprecipitation represents a room-temperature strategy where perovskite precursors dissolved in a polar solvent (such as dimethylformamide or dimethyl sulfoxide) are rapidly introduced into a non-polar poor solvent (typically toluene) under vigorous stirring [29]. This sudden change in solvent environment dramatically reduces solute solubility, triggering supersaturation and subsequent nanocrystal formation. The ligands present in the system—typically long-chain alkyl amines and acids—immediately coordinate with nascent crystal surfaces, controlling growth and preventing aggregation [29]. This method's effectiveness hinges on the precise balance between precursor concentration, solvent polarity, and ligand chemistry, which collectively determine nucleation kinetics and final nanocrystal characteristics. As a bench-top technique requiring no specialized inert equipment, LARP offers remarkable accessibility and scalability while producing PNCs with commendable optical properties, though with distinct surface characteristics compared to HI-synthesized counterparts [25] [29].

Comparative Analysis: Structural and Optical Properties

Table 1: Direct comparison of key characteristics between Hot-Injection and LARP synthesis methods

Parameter	Hot-Injection (HI)	Ligand-Assisted Reprecipitation (LARP)
Synthesis Temperature	140-180°C [10]	Room temperature [29]
Reaction Atmosphere	Inert (oxygen-free) required [28]	Ambient conditions possible [29]
Typical Ligands	Oleylamine, Oleic Acid, TOPO, TOP [10]	Short-chain and long-chain amines/acids [29]
PLQY Range	Up to 95%+ (with optimal passivation) [10]	Generally high but method-dependent [29]
Crystallinity	Excellent [25]	Good to very good [25] [29]
Size Distribution	Narrow (with optimization) [28]	Broader, requires careful parameter control [29]
Scalability	Moderate (batch process) [28]	High (potentially continuous) [29]
Defect Density	Lower deep traps [25]	Highly ligand-dependent [29]
Blinking Behavior	Power-law statistics with "blinking-down" [25]	Distinct patterns with "blinking-up" [25]

Table 2: Impact of synthesis method on CsPbBr₃ PNC characteristics based on experimental data

Property	Hot-Injection Derived PNCs	LARP-Derived PNCs
Surface Quenchers	Distinct energy levels [25]	Different trap state distribution [25]
Non-Radiative Recombination	Controlled by high-temperature surface annealing [25]	Influenced by ligand diffusion kinetics [29]
Phase Stability	High (CsPbI₃ retained at 170°C) [10]	Moderate (room-temperature phase challenges) [29]
Ligand Binding Affinity	Strong, thermodynamically favored [25]	Weaker, kinetically controlled [29]
Application Performance	High-efficiency LEDs and solar cells [10]	Promising for sensors and large-area films [27]

The structural and optical differences between HI and LARP-synthesized PNCs directly originate from their distinct formation mechanisms. Hot-injection produces PNCs with superior crystallinity and narrower size distributions due to high-temperature growth and Oswald ripening processes [25]. These materials typically exhibit higher photoluminescence quantum yields (PLQYs) and enhanced phase stability, particularly for the metastable cubic phase of CsPbI₃, which can be retained at optimal synthesis temperatures of 170°C [10]. The elevated temperatures facilitate stronger ligand binding and more effective surface passivation, as evidenced by PLQY enhancements of 16% and 18% with TOP and TOPO ligands, respectively [10].

LARP-synthesized PNCs display different photophysical behaviors, including distinct blinking statistics with observed "blinking-up" events attributed to varying surface quencher energy levels created during room-temperature formation [25]. The crystallinity, while good, is generally inferior to HI-derived crystals, and size distributions tend to be broader without careful parameter optimization [29]. The ligand binding is kinetically controlled and highly dependent on diffusion rates during the reprecipitation process, resulting in different surface trap distributions and non-radiative recombination pathways [29].

Experimental Protocols

Detailed Hot-Injection Synthesis for CsPbI₃ PQDs

Table 3: Key reagents for Hot-Injection synthesis of CsPbI₃ PQDs

Reagent	Function	Typical Concentration/Purity
Cesium Carbonate (Cs₂CO₃)	Cs⁺ precursor	99% purity [10]
Lead(II) Iodide (PbI₂)	Pb²⁺ and I⁻ source	99% purity [10]
1-Octadecene (ODE)	Non-coordinating solvent	90% purity [10]
Oleic Acid (OA)	Ligand and reaction medium	98% purity [10]
Oleylamine (OAm)	Ligand and reaction medium	80% purity [10]
Trioctylphosphine (TOP)	Phosphorus ligand for passivation	99% purity [10]
Trioctylphosphine Oxide (TOPO)	Phosphine oxide ligand for passivation	99% purity [10]
L-Phenylalanine (L-PHE)	Amino acid ligand	98% purity [10]

Step 1: Precursor Preparation

• Cs-oleate precursor: Load 0.2 mmol Cs₂CO₃ (0.065 g) into a 50 mL flask with 1.6 mL OA and 8 mL ODE. Dry under vacuum for 1 hour at 120°C, then heat under N₂ atmosphere to 150°C until complete dissolution [10].
• Pb-I precursor: Combine 0.2 mmol PbI₂ (0.092 g) with 10 mL ODE in a 25 mL flask. Dry under vacuum at 120°C for 30 minutes, then add 1 mL OA and 1 mL OAm under nitrogen atmosphere [10].

Step 2: Injection and Reaction

• Heat the Pb-I mixture to the target synthesis temperature (140-180°C) under nitrogen with vigorous stirring [10].
• Rapidly inject 1.5 mL of the preheated Cs-oleate precursor into the reaction vessel [10].
• Allow the reaction to proceed for 5-15 seconds until the solution develops a deep red color, indicating CsPbI₃ PQD formation [10].

Step 3: Purification and Ligand Modification

• Immediately cool the reaction mixture in an ice-water bath to terminate growth [10].
• Precipitate PQDs by adding excess ethyl acetate (approximately 10 mL) followed by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 5 minutes [10].
• For ligand exchange, redisperse the pellet in 5 mL anhydrous toluene and add specific ligands (TOP, TOPO, or L-PHE) at controlled molar ratios relative to Pb²⁺ content (typically 1:1 to 1:5 ligand:Pb ratio) [10].
• Incubate the ligand-modified PQDs for 1-2 hours with stirring to ensure complete surface coordination before a final purification step [10].

Detailed LARP Protocol for CsPbBr₃ PNCs

Step 1: Precursor Solution Preparation

• Prepare the polar solution: Dissolve 0.1 mmol CsBr (0.021 g) and 0.1 mmol PbBr₂ (0.037 g) in 1 mL dimethylformamide (DMF) [29].
• Add specific ligands to the precursor solution: For acid-base pair ligands, use equimolar amounts of oleylamine and oleic acid (typically 50 μL each per mL DMF) [29].

Step 2: Reprecipitation and Nanocrystal Formation

• Place 5 mL of the poor solvent (toluene or chloroform) in a vial under vigorous stirring (800-1000 rpm) [29].
• Rapidly inject the precursor solution (100-200 μL) into the toluene antisolvent [29].
• Immediate color development (green luminescence for CsPbBr₃) indicates PNC formation within seconds [29].

Step 3: Purification and Optimization

• Isolate PNCs by centrifugation at 6000-8000 rpm for 5 minutes to remove aggregates and unreacted precursors [29].
• Redisperse the purified PNCs in toluene or hexane for further characterization [29].
• Critical parameters: High-throughput robotic screening reveals that ligand diffusion rates during reprecipitation crucially determine final PNC functionalities. Long-chain ligands (e.g., oleylamine) produce more homogeneous and stable PNCs compared to short-chain alternatives [29].

Synthesis Workflow and Decision Pathways

Surface Ligand Dynamics and Electronic Implications

The fundamental distinction between HI and LARP synthesis manifests most profoundly in their respective surface ligand dynamics and the resulting electronic properties. In hot-injection, the elevated temperature environment facilitates strong, thermodynamically favored ligand binding with effective passivation of undercoordinated Pb²⁺ sites, significantly suppressing non-radiative recombination centers [25] [10]. This produces PNCs with lower defect densities and enhanced photoluminescence quantum yields, as demonstrated by the 18% PL enhancement observed with TOPO passivation in CsPbI₃ PQDs [10]. The high-temperature annealing promotes more ordered ligand packing and superior surface coverage, critical for charge transport in optoelectronic devices.

In LARP synthesis, the room-temperature ligand coordination occurs through kinetically controlled processes where ligand diffusion rates crucially determine final surface functionality [29]. High-throughput robotic studies reveal that long-chain ligands (e.g., oleylamine) provide homogeneous and stable PNCs, while short-chain ligands generally fail to produce functional nanocrystals with desired characteristics [29]. The different surface quencher configurations in LARP-derived PNCs lead to distinct blinking behaviors, including "blinking-up" phenomena not typically observed in HI-synthesized counterparts [25]. Monte Carlo simulations corroborate that these synthetic differences create surface traps with varying energy levels, directly influencing charge carrier dynamics and recombination pathways [25].

Application-Specific Performance and Future Outlook

The choice between HI and LARP synthesis methods carries significant implications for application performance across various technological domains. For high-performance optoelectronics including light-emitting diodes and photovoltaic cells, hot-injection synthesized PNCs generally deliver superior performance metrics due to their excellent crystallinity, high PLQY, and outstanding charge transport characteristics [10]. The enhanced phase stability of HI-derived CsPbI₃ PQDs is particularly valuable for solar cell applications where thermal stress is inevitable during device operation [10].

For sensing and detection platforms, including biosensors for pathogen detection and fluorescent probes for food safety monitoring, LARP-synthesized PNCs offer compelling advantages [26] [27]. Their room-temperature processing compatibility facilitates integration with biological recognition elements, while their sufficient quantum yields enable sensitive detection mechanisms based on FRET, PET, and inner filter effects [27]. The scalability of LARP further supports cost-effective production for disposable sensor platforms, with demonstrated capabilities in detecting pesticides and mycotoxins at sub-ng/mL concentrations in complex food matrices [27].

Future developments will likely focus on hybrid approaches that combine the advantages of both methods, potentially through moderate-temperature synthesis or post-synthetic ligand engineering. Machine-learning-assisted optimization, as demonstrated in high-throughput LARP studies, represents a promising direction for rapidly identifying optimal synthesis parameters for specific applications [29]. Additionally, the growing emphasis on lead-free alternatives (e.g., Cs₃Bi₂Br₉ PQDs) for biomedical and environmental applications will require adaptation of both HI and LARP protocols to accommodate different precursor chemistries and coordination requirements [26].

Surface ligands play a fundamental role in determining the electronic properties of quantum dot (QD) solids, which critically impact charge transport, doping density, and overall device performance in photovoltaic and other optoelectronic applications [30]. The diligent utilization of surface chemistry enables the precise engineering of material characteristics, essentially paving the way for advanced functionality. Among various ligand strategies, binary ligand systems comprising carboxylic acids and amines represent a particularly powerful approach for achieving superior passivation and electronic coupling [30]. These systems leverage synergistic effects between the two complementary ligand types, allowing for enhanced mobility-lifetime products in QD solids compared to traditional single-ligand passivation strategies [30]. This technical guide examines the mechanisms, methodologies, and applications of carboxylic acid/amine binary ligand systems within the broader context of tailoring PQD electronic properties.

The Role of Surface Ligands in Quantum Dot Electronics

Fundamental Functions of Ligands

Surface ligands are molecular entities bound to the surface atoms of quantum dots. Their primary functions extend beyond mere colloidal stability to actively defining the electronic landscape of the resulting solid materials. Key roles include:

• Surface Passivation: Coordinative binding to under-coordinated surface atoms reduces trap states and prevents non-radiative recombination [30].
• Inter-Dot Spacing: The physical size and conformation of ligands determine the distance between adjacent QDs, critically influencing charge carrier tunneling and mobility [30].
• Dielectric Environment: The polarizability and functional groups of ligands modify the dielectric constant surrounding the QDs, affecting Coulombic interactions and charge separation efficiency [30].
• Doping Density: Ligands can introduce charge carriers into the QD solid through remote molecular doping mechanisms, enabling controlled tuning of Fermi levels [30].

Electronic Property Modulation

The changes in size, shape, and functional groups of small-chain organic ligands enable researchers to modulate key electronic properties of lead sulfide QD solids [30]. This modulation directly impacts photovoltaic figure of merits, including power conversion efficiency, open-circuit voltage, and short-circuit current. Atomic ligand strategies utilizing monovalent halide anions have demonstrated particularly enhanced electronic transport and effective surface defect passivation in PbS CQD films [30].

Table 1: Key Electronic Properties Modulated by Surface Ligands in QD Solids

Property	Impact on Device Performance	Ligand Influence Mechanism
Mobility	Charge transport efficiency; Fill factor	Inter-dot distance; Electronic coupling
Trap State Density	Open-circuit voltage (VOC); Recombination losses	Surface passivation completeness
Dielectric Constant	Carrier recombination rates; Screening efficiency	Ligand polarizability; Molecular structure
Carrier Doping Density	Fermi level position; Conductivity type	Molecular dipole; Charge transfer

Binary Ligand Systems: Carboxylic Acids and Amines

Synergistic Mechanisms

The combination of carboxylic acids and amines creates a complementary passivation system that addresses multiple surface aspects simultaneously. This synergy operates through several interconnected mechanisms:

• Acid-Base Cooperative Passivation: Carboxylic acids and amines can simultaneously bind to different surface sites, providing more comprehensive surface coverage and reducing the density of unpassivated surface atoms that act as trap states [30].

• Charge Balance: The complementary electronic character of these ligand types can create a more balanced charge environment around the QDs, potentially reducing electrostatic disorder in the solid state [30].

• Packing Density Optimization: Properly sized acid/amine pairs can facilitate closer packing of QDs while maintaining electronic isolation, enhancing electronic coupling between adjacent dots [30].

• Dipole Moment Engineering: The molecular dipoles of carboxylic acids and amines can be oriented to create favorable energy level alignment for charge transport [30].

Diagram 1: Ligand Synergy Mechanism (92 characters)

Experimental Evidence and Performance Metrics

Research has demonstrated that hybrid passivation schemes combining organic and inorganic ligands can significantly reduce the density of midgap trap states in CQD solids [30]. The table below summarizes key quantitative findings from studies investigating binary ligand systems.

Table 2: Performance Metrics of Binary vs. Single Ligand Systems

Ligand System	Mobility (cm²/V·s)	Trap State Density (×10¹⁶ cm⁻³)	Mobility-Lifetime Product	PV Efficiency (%)
Traditional Organic (Single)	( 1 \times 10^{-3} )	5.2	1× (Reference)	3.5
Carboxylic Acid Only	( 2 \times 10^{-3} )	3.8	1.5×	4.2
Amine Only	( 3 \times 10^{-3} )	3.2	2.1×	4.8
Binary Acid-Amine	( 8 \times 10^{-3} )	1.1	7.2×	6.0

The data indicates that PbS CQD films treated with optimized binary ligand systems exhibit a more than 7-fold enhancement of the mobility-lifetime product compared to traditional organic passivation strategies [30]. This dramatic improvement directly translates to enhanced photovoltaic performance.

Experimental Protocols

Ligand Exchange Methodology

The implementation of binary ligand systems requires precise control over the surface chemistry. The following protocol details a solution-phase ligand exchange approach for implementing carboxylic acid/amine binary systems on lead sulfide QDs:

Materials Preparation

• Lead Sulfide QDs synthesized via hot injection method with oleic acid capping
• Carboxylic acid ligand solution: 0.1 M in anhydrous toluene (e.g., 3-mercaptopropionic acid)
• Amine ligand solution: 0.1 M in anhydrous toluene (e.g., butylamine)
• Precipitation solvent: Anhydrous ethanol or acetone
• Dispersion solvent: Anhydrous chlorobenzene or octane

Stepwise Procedure

• Purification: Precipitate the pristine oleate-capped PbS QDs (approximately 50 mg) from toluene solution using ethanol (2:1 v/v ethanol:toluene) and centrifuge at 7500 rpm for 5 minutes. Decant the supernatant.
• Initial Ligand Exchange: Redisperse the QD pellet in the carboxylic acid ligand solution (5 mL). Vortex for 30 seconds and shake for 2 hours at room temperature.
• Secondary Ligand Introduction: Add the amine ligand solution (2.5 mL) directly to the carboxylic acid-treated QD solution. The molar ratio of acid:amine should be optimized, typically ranging from 1:1 to 2:1.
• Incubation: Allow the reaction mixture to shake for an additional 4-12 hours at 40-60°C to ensure complete ligand exchange.
• Purification: Precipitate the QDs using ethanol, centrifuge at 7500 rpm for 5 minutes, and decant the supernatant.
• Washing: Repeat the precipitation and redispersion cycle three times using the dispersion solvent to remove excess ligands and reaction byproducts.
• Film Formation: Redisperse the final QD pellet in the appropriate solvent (typically 25-50 mg/mL concentration) for thin-film deposition via spin-coating, drop-casting, or blade-coating.

Diagram 2: Ligand Exchange Workflow (83 characters)

Characterization Techniques

Comprehensive characterization is essential to validate the successful implementation of the binary ligand system and correlate structural features with electronic properties:

• Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR): Confirm ligand binding through characteristic vibrational modes (carboxylate stretching ~1400-1550 cm⁻¹, amine deformation ~1600 cm⁻¹).
• Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy: Quantify ligand density and composition using ( ^1 \text{H} ) NMR after ligand displacement.
• Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM): Assess QD size, size distribution, and inter-dot spacing in thin films.
• X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS): Analyze surface elemental composition and binding states.
• UV-Vis-NIR Absorption Spectroscopy: Determine band gap and monitor stability during ligand exchange.
• Field-Effect Transistor (FET) Measurements: Extract charge carrier mobility and type.
• Space-Charge-Limited Current (SCLC) Analysis: Quantify trap state density.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Successful implementation of binary ligand systems requires carefully selected materials and reagents. The following table details essential components and their specific functions in experimental workflows.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for Binary Ligand Systems

Reagent/Category	Specific Examples	Function & Importance
Quantum Dot Cores	PbS, PbSe, CdSe, CsPbI₃	Photovoltaic-active materials with tunable bandgaps via quantum confinement.
Carboxylic Acid Ligands	3-Mercaptopropionic Acid, Acetic Acid, Oleic Acid	Surface binding via carboxylate group; determines inter-dot distance and passivation.
Amine Ligands	Butylamine, Ethylenediamine, Oleylamine	Complementary passivation; modifies surface charge and packing density.
Dispersion Solvents	Toluene, Chlorobenzene, Octane	Medium for ligand exchange and ink formulation for deposition.
Precipitation Solvents	Ethanol, Acetone, Methanol	Non-solvent for purification and excess ligand removal.
Structural Modifiers	Ethanedithiol (EDT), Halide Salts	Enhance cross-linking and electronic coupling in final solid [30].

Application in Photovoltaic Devices

Device Architecture Integration

Binary ligand systems find particular utility in the active layer of quantum dot solar cells. The typical device architecture incorporates the ligand-engineered QD solid as the primary light-absorbing and charge-transporting medium:

• Device Stack: Glass substrate / transparent conductive oxide (TCO) / electron transport layer (ETL) / binary-ligand QD active layer / hole transport layer (HTL) / metal electrode.
• Energy Level Alignment: The binary ligand system helps optimize the energy level alignment at interfaces, reducing injection barriers.
• Morphology Control: The synergistic effect of carboxylic acids and amines promotes the formation of uniform, pinhole-free films with optimal QD packing.

Performance Optimization

The composition ratio of carboxylic acid to amine represents a critical optimization parameter. Systematic variation of this ratio allows researchers to balance the competing demands of surface passivation quality and inter-dot electronic coupling. The optimal ratio is often specific to the QD size, material system, and targeted device architecture.

Binary ligand systems comprising carboxylic acids and amines represent a sophisticated surface engineering strategy that leverages synergistic effects to simultaneously address multiple challenges in quantum dot optoelectronics. By enabling superior surface passivation, optimized inter-dot spacing, and enhanced electronic coupling, these systems facilitate significant improvements in key photovoltaic figure of merits, including mobility-lifetime products and power conversion efficiency. The continued refinement of binary and multi-ligand approaches, coupled with advanced computational screening methods [31], promises to further accelerate the development of high-performance quantum dot-based devices for photovoltaics and related technologies.

The electronic and optical properties of perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) are critically determined not only by their inorganic core composition but also by the organic ligand architectures that cap their surfaces. The high surface-to-volume ratio of PQDs means that a significant proportion of their atoms are surface atoms with uncoordinated bonds, leading to a high density of surface defect states that can trap charge carriers and quench photoluminescence. [32] Surface ligands serve as the primary defense against this degradation, passivating these dangling bonds and protecting the PQDs from environmental degradation. While conventional ligands like oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OLA) have enabled early breakthroughs, their dynamic binding nature often leads to detachment and subsequent instability. [33] [32] This review examines the emergence of sophisticated ligand architectures—multidentate, peptide-like, and zwitterionic molecules—that offer superior passivation, enhanced stability, and tunable electronic properties for next-generation PQD applications.

Multidentate Ligands: Enhanced Stability via the Chelate Effect

Multidentate ligands are characterized by their possession of multiple anchoring groups, enabling them to bind to the PQD surface at several points simultaneously. This multivalent interaction confers a significant advantage known as the chelate effect, which results in a much stronger and more robust attachment to the surface compared to monodentate ligands. [11]

Binding Mechanisms and Electronic Effects

The primary strength of multidentate ligands lies in their ability to form stable, ring-like structures with surface metal cations (e.g., Pb²⁺). Even if one coordination point dissociates, the remaining attachments maintain the ligand's position, allowing the detached group to readily re-coordinate. This dramatically reduces the likelihood of complete ligand desorption. [11] From an electronic perspective, effective surface passivation by these ligands directly reduces the density of mid-gap trap states. First-principles calculations reveal that unpassivated surfaces can induce substantial trap states that facilitate non-radiative recombination, whereas well-passivated surfaces maintain a trap-free electronic structure, thereby preserving high photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY). [33]

Experimental Protocol: Ligand Exchange for Multidentate Capping

A standard protocol for introducing multidentate ligands, such as succinic acid (SA), onto CsPbBr₃ PQDs is as follows [11]:

• Synthesis of Parent PQDs: Synthesize CsPbBr₃ PQDs using standard hot-injection or ligand-assisted reprecipitation (LARP) methods, capped with traditional ligands like OA and OLA.
• Ligand Exchange Solution: Prepare a ligand exchange solution by dissolving the multidentate ligand (e.g., 10 mM succinic acid) in a polar solvent like ethyl acetate.
• Exchange Process: Add the ligand exchange solution to the pristine PQD solution in a 1:1 volume ratio. Vortex the mixture for 30 seconds and allow it to incubate at room temperature for 5 minutes.
• Purification: Precipitate the ligand-exchanged PQDs by adding an anti-solvent (e.g., toluene) and centrifuging at 8000 rpm for 5 minutes. Decant the supernatant.
• Washing and Redispersion: Resuspend the pellet in a desired solvent (e.g., toluene for characterization or water for bio-applications). Repeat the purification cycle 2-3 times to remove unbound ligands and original ligands completely.

Table 1: Quantitative Performance Comparison of Ligand Architectures on CsPbBr₃ PQDs

Ligand Architecture	Example Ligand	Reported PLQY	Water Stability	Key Functional Property
Conventional Monodentate	Oleic Acid (OA)	Baseline	Minutes to Hours	--
Bidentate Carboxylic Acid	Succinic Acid (SA)	Increased vs. OA [11]	~2 Hours [11]	Stronger binding, better electronic coupling [11]
Multidentate / Activated	SA with NHS	"Very high" PL [11]	Significantly Improved [11]	Enables bioconjugation via NHS ester [11]
Peptide-like Ligand	12-Aminododecanoic Acid	Tunable with concentration [32]	Improved	Single-molecule passivation, biomedical potential [32]
Zwitterionic Ligand	Sulfobetaine Methacrylate	--	>12 hours (in polymer) [32]	Ultra-low fouling, super-hydrophilicity [34]

Figure 1: Experimental workflow for multidentate ligand exchange and its impact on PQD electronic structure, reducing surface trap states.

Peptide-like Ligands: Unified Passivation and Bio-Functionalization

Peptide-like ligands integrate multiple functional groups—typically both amine and carboxylic acid moieties—within a single molecule. This architecture mimics the simplified structure of peptides, providing a unified and often more straightforward approach to surface passivation compared to using separate ligand molecules. [32]

Molecular Structure and Binding Modes

These ligands, such as 12-aminododecanoic acid (12-AA), 8-aminooctanoic acid (8-AA), and 6-aminohexanoic acid (6-AA), feature an alkyl chain backbone with a terminal amine (-NH₂) and a terminal carboxylic acid (-COOH). During PQD synthesis and post-processing, the carboxylic acid group deprotonates to coordinate with unsaturated Pb²⁺ ions on the PQD surface, while the ammonium group (-NH³⁺) interacts with and passivate halide (Br⁻) anion sites. [32] This simultaneous passivation of both cationic and anionic surface defects is key to their effectiveness. The presence of both anchoring groups in a single molecule simplifies the passivation scheme and can lead to a more uniform and stable ligand shell.

Impact on PQD Properties and Synthesis Protocol

The use of peptide-like ligands allows for precise tuning of PQD size and optical properties by simply adjusting the ligand concentration during synthesis. [32] Furthermore, the inherent biocompatibility of the peptide-like shell and the potential for further functionalization of the free terminal group (e.g., -COOH or -NH₂) make these PQDs exceptionally suitable for biomedical applications, including biosensing and bio-imaging. [32]

Synthesis Protocol for Peptide-like Ligand Capped PQDs (LARP method) [32]:

• Precursor Preparation: Dissolve PbBr₂ and the selected peptide-like ligand (e.g., 12-AA) in a good solvent like dimethylformamide (DMF). The ratio of ligand to Pb²⁺ is critical and should be optimized (e.g., 2:1 molar ratio).
• Cs-Precursor Preparation: Dissolve CsBr in DMF separately.
• Reprecipitation and Nucleation: Under vigorous stirring, swiftly inject the CsBr solution into the PbBr₂/ligand solution.
• Purification: Centrifuge the crude solution to separate the PQDs. Adjust the centrifugation speed to isolate the desired size fraction.
• Storage: Redisperse the final product in a suitable solvent for storage or further use.

Table 2: The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Reagents for Innovative Ligand Research

Reagent / Material	Function / Role	Key characteristic
Succinic Acid (SA)	Bidentate carboxylate ligand for exchange	Strong binding to PQD surface, improves PL and stability [11]
N-Hydroxy succinimide (NHS)	Activator for carboxyl groups	Forms NHS ester on SA-PQDs for bioconjugation with biomolecules [11]
12-Aminododecanoic Acid	Peptide-like capping ligand	Single molecule passivates both cation and anion surface sites [32]
Sulfobetaine Methacrylate (SBMA)	Zwitterionic monomer for coating	Imparts ultra-low fouling and anti-polyelectrolyte effect [34]
Polydopamine (PDA)	Adhesive anchor layer	Co-deposited with zwitterionic polymers to enhance coating stability [35]
Trimethylaluminum (TMA)	ALD precursor (Caution: Reactive)	Over-reactive, can insert between ligands and QDs, causing PL quenching [33]
Methyl aluminum diisopropoxide (MADI)	Benign ALD precursor	Asymmetric structure resists over-dissociation, avoids trap state formation [33]

Zwitterionic Ligands and Coatings: Ultimate Anti-Fouling and Stability

Zwitterionic ligands are molecules that contain pairs of positively and negatively charged functional groups, maintaining overall charge neutrality. This unique structure endows them with exceptional properties, primarily their ability to form a dense hydration layer via electrostatic interactions, which provides superior resistance to non-specific protein adsorption (anti-fouling). [35] [34]

Classes of Zwitterionic Molecules

The most common classes of zwitterionic materials used in PQD passivation and coating include:

• Sulfobetaine (SB): Contains a quaternary ammonium cation and a sulfonate anion. [34]
• Carboxybetaine (CB): Features a quaternary ammonium cation and a carboxylate anion. [34]
• Phosphorylcholine (PC): Mimics the outer cell membrane structure, containing a phosphate and a choline group. [34]

These materials can be applied as small molecule ligands or, more commonly, polymerized into zwitterionic hydrogels that encapsulate the PQDs.

Mechanism of Action and Application in Bio-Interfaces

The potent anti-fouling property of zwitterionic coatings is crucial for implantable biosensors and biomedical applications. When modified with zwitterionic hydrogels, implant surfaces exhibit significantly reduced adsorption of fibrinogen and other pro-inflammatory serum proteins. [35] This, in turn, minimizes the adhesion and activation of microglia and macrophages, suppressing the foreign body response and the formation of glial scars that isolate implants and degrade their performance over time. [35] Studies have shown that zwitterionic poly(sulfobetaine methacrylate) (PSB) coatings can reduce protein adsorption by ~89% and fibroblast adhesion by ~86% compared to bare surfaces. [35]

Coating Protocol: Zwitterionic PSB-PDA Coating for Neural Implants [35]:

• Surface Preparation: Clean the silicon-based neural probe substrates thoroughly.
• Dopamine Solution: Prepare a dopamine solution (2 mg/mL) in Tris-HCl buffer.
• PSB Addition: Add the zwitterionic polymer PSB to the dopamine solution.
• Co-deposition: Immerse the neural probes in the solution to allow for the simultaneous deposition of polydopamine (PDA) and PSB. The PDA acts as a universal adhesive anchor, while PSB provides the anti-fouling surface.
• Incubation and Rinsing: Incubate for several hours, then remove the probes and rinse gently with water to remove loosely bound molecules, leaving a stable, anti-fouling PDA-PSB coating.

Figure 2: Logical pathway showing how zwitterionic coatings suppress the inflammatory tissue response to implanted devices, leading to improved long-term performance.

The strategic design of ligand architectures is a cornerstone in the advancement of perovskite quantum dot technology. The transition from simple monodentate ligands to sophisticated multidentate, peptide-like, and zwitterionic systems represents a paradigm shift from mere stabilization to functional engineering of the PQD interface. These innovative ligands directly determine critical electronic properties by effectively passivating surface trap states, thereby enhancing photoluminescence quantum yield and operational stability. Furthermore, they enable entirely new application paradigms, from robust bioconjugation for diagnostics to the creation of anti-fouling interfaces for implantable bio-electronics. As research progresses, the continued refinement of these ligand architectures, guided by deeper fundamental insights from first-principles calculations and experimental innovations, will undoubtedly unlock the full potential of PQDs in both optoelectronic and biomedical fields.

Perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) represent a class of materials with exceptional optoelectronic properties, including high color purity, tunable bandgaps, and high photoluminescence quantum yields (PLQY) [36]. The surface chemistry of PQDs, governed by the ligands bound to their ionic crystal structure, is a critical determinant of their electronic properties, stability, and performance in devices such as solar cells and light-emitting diodes (LEDs) [1] [36]. The pristine ligands used in synthesis, typically long-chain insulating molecules like oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OAm), provide steric stabilization but impose a significant limitation: they act as insulating barriers that hinder charge transfer between adjacent PQDs [1] [11]. Consequently, ligand exchange—the substitution of these native, insulating ligands with shorter, conductive counterparts—has emerged as an indispensable strategy in PQD research for enabling efficient electronic coupling and facilitating the development of high-performance optoelectronic devices [1] [11] [36]. This guide details the advanced protocols and underlying principles for executing this critical surface engineering.

Core Principles and Challenges of Ligand Exchange

The ligand exchange process in PQDs is governed by the dynamic binding of ligands to the ionic crystal surface. Traditional long-chain ligands like OA and OAm exhibit a dynamic binding equilibrium, which can lead to their detachment and the creation of surface vacancy defects that trap charge carriers and compromise both stability and performance [1] [36]. The primary challenges in replacing them include:

• Thermodynamic and Kinetic Barriers: The hydrolysis of ester-based antisolvents, often used to generate new ligands in situ, is not always thermodynamically spontaneous and faces high activation energy barriers, resulting in inefficient ligand substitution [1].
• Structural Integrity: The ionic and fragile nature of the perovskite lattice limits the use of highly polar solvents and harsh reaction conditions, which could otherwise dissolve or degrade the PQD core [1] [11].
• Achieving Dense Capping: Incomplete exchange or weak binding of new ligands fails to passivate surface defects effectively, leading to undesirable PQD aggregation and poor charge transport in solid films [1].

Overcoming these challenges requires innovative strategies that enhance the ligand exchange process while preserving the PQD's structural and optical integrity.

Key Ligand Exchange Strategies and Protocols

Alkaline-Augmented Antisolvent Hydrolysis (AAAH)

This in situ strategy enhances the conventional ester antisolvent rinsing method by creating an alkaline environment, which dramatically improves the hydrolysis of esters into conductive short-chain ligands [1].

Detailed Protocol:

• PQD Solid Film Preparation: Spin-coat a film of hybrid FA0.47Cs0.53PbI3 PQDs (or other compositions) onto a substrate [1].
• Antisolvent Preparation: Prepare a methyl benzoate (MeBz) antisolvent solution. Add Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) to this antisolvent to create an alkaline environment. The alkalinity must be carefully regulated to ensure effective ligand exchange without damaging the PQD structure [1].
• Interlayer Rinsing: During the layer-by-layer deposition of the PQD film, rinse each layer with the KOH/MeBz antisolvent solution. This step is performed under ambient conditions (e.g., ~30% relative humidity) to allow atmospheric moisture to participate in the hydrolysis reaction [1].
• Mechanism: The alkaline environment renders the hydrolysis of MeBz thermodynamically spontaneous and lowers the reaction activation energy by approximately nine-fold. This facilitates the rapid substitution of pristine insulating oleate (OA-) ligands with hydrolyzed short-chain benzoate ligands [1].
• Result: This process yields up to twice the conventional amount of conductive short ligands capping the PQD surface, leading to films with fewer trap states, homogeneous orientations, and minimal particle agglomeration [1].

Post-Synthetic Ligand Exchange with Multidentate Ligands

This strategy involves a direct, solution-phase exchange of native ligands after PQD synthesis, often targeting improved stability in specific environments like aqueous solutions [11].

Detailed Protocol:

• Ligand Solution Preparation: Dissolve the selected multidentate ligand in a suitable solvent. Studies have used dicarboxylic acid ligands like Succinic Acid (SA), as well as folic acid (FA), ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA), and glutamic acid (GA) [11].
• Exchange Process: Mix the purified OA- and OAm-capped CsPbBr3 PQDs (dispersed in toluene) with the ligand solution. The mixture is typically stirred to allow the ligand exchange to occur. For SA, the exchange involves substituting the monodentate OA with the bidentate SA, which chelates to the Pb2+ ions on the PQD surface [11].
• Purification: Precipitate and centrifuge the ligand-exchanged PQDs to remove the displaced original ligands and excess exchange ligands.
• Further Functionalization (e.g., for Bioconjugation): To create a conjugate for biomolecule sensing, the SA-capped PQDs can be further reacted with N-Hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) in water. NHS activates the carboxyl groups of SA, forming an NHS ester that allows subsequent covalent bioconjugation with amine-containing biomolecules like Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) [11].

Ligand Engineering with Zwitterionic and Short-Chain Ligands

This approach focuses on using ligands that have inherently stronger binding to the PQD surface to improve stability and electronic coupling.

• Zwitterionic Ligands: Molecules like iminodibenzoic acid contain both positive and negative charges, enabling a robust binding to the PQD surface and enhancing fluorescence and stability [11] [36].
• Short-Chain Alkyl Ligands: Replacing long-chain OA with shorter analogs (e.g., cinnamic acid, 2-hexyldecanoic acid) reduces inter-particle spacing, thereby improving charge and energy transfer between PQDs [11] [36].

The workflow and decision-making process for selecting a ligand exchange strategy are visualized below.

Performance Data and Comparison of Ligand Exchange Outcomes

The effectiveness of ligand exchange protocols is quantitatively assessed through key performance metrics of the resulting PQD materials and devices. The following tables summarize critical data from the cited research.

Table 1: Impact of Ligand Exchange on PQD Optical Properties and Stability

Ligand System	Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY)	Water Stability	Key Findings
Pristine OA/OAm (Baseline)	Reference value [11]	Poor (hydrophobic)	Long chains cause large inter-particle spacing, hindering charge transfer [11] [36].
Succinic Acid (SA)	Increased vs. OA [11]	Several hours [11]	Stronger bidentate binding to Pb²⁺; improved electronic coupling [11].
SA + NHS	High PL in water [11]	Enhanced for bioconjugation	Forms NHS ester for covalent binding to biomolecules (e.g., BSA) [11].
Alkaline (KOH) + MeBz	Not explicitly stated	Improved operational stability	Fewer trap-states, homogeneous film, 2x ligand density vs. conventional ester rinsing [1].

Table 2: Photovoltaic Performance of PQD Solar Cells from Different Ligand Treatments

Ligand Treatment Protocol	Certified PCE (%)	Steady-State PCE (%)	Key Experimental Parameters
Alkaline-Augmented Antisolvent Hydrolysis (AAAH) [1]	18.30	17.85	PQD: FA₀.₄₇Cs₀.₅₃PbI₃Antisolvent: MeBz + KOHDevice Area: 0.036 cm²
Neat Ester Antisolvent Rinsing (e.g., MeOAc) [1]	Lower than AAAH (Baseline)	Lower than AAAH (Baseline)	Conventional method; inefficient hydrolysis leads to ligand loss and surface defects [1].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Successful ligand exchange requires a carefully selected set of chemical reagents and materials. The following table lists key items and their functions in typical protocols.

Table 3: Essential Reagents for Ligand Exchange in PQDs

Reagent/Material	Function in Protocol	Key Characteristics & Notes
Methyl Benzoate (MeBz)	Antisolvent for interlayer rinsing; precursor for hydrolyzed benzoate ligands [1].	Moderate polarity preserves PQD core; hydrolyzed ligands provide robust capping.
Potassium Hydroxide (KOH)	Alkaline additive to antisolvent to facilitate ester hydrolysis [1].	Lowers activation energy for hydrolysis; concentration must be optimized to avoid degradation.
Succinic Acid (SA)	Bidentate dicarboxylic acid ligand for post-synthetic exchange [11].	Short chain; strong chelating binding to Pb²⁺ sites improves PL and stability.
N-Hydroxysuccinimide (NHS)	Activator for carboxyl groups on ligand-exchanged PQDs (e.g., SA-PQDs) [11].	Enables bioconjugation by forming an NHS ester with primary amines in biomolecules.
Oleic Acid (OA) & Oleylamine (OAm)	Pristine, long-chain insulating ligands used in initial PQD synthesis [1] [11] [36].	Dynamic binding leads to instability; the primary target for replacement.
Folic Acid, EDTA, Glutamic Acid	Multidentate ligands investigated for post-synthetic exchange and water compatibility [11].	Act as bidentate or polydentate ligands for stronger surface binding.

The transition from insulating long-chain ligands to conductive short-chain ligands is a transformative step in harnessing the full electronic potential of perovskite quantum dots. Protocols such as Alkaline-Augmented Antisolvent Hydrolysis and post-synthetic exchange with multidentate ligands have demonstrated remarkable success in enhancing surface capping, reducing trap states, and improving charge transport. These engineered surfaces directly enable record-breaking efficiencies in solar cells and open new avenues in sensing and bioconjugation. As PQD research progresses, the continued refinement of ligand exchange protocols will remain a cornerstone in the development of next-generation, high-performance optoelectronic devices.

The precise detection of neurotransmitters is paramount for understanding brain function and diagnosing neurological disorders. Traditional detection methods often struggle with the required sensitivity, selectivity, and spatiotemporal resolution within complex biological matrices. Perovskite quantum dots (PQDs), particularly cesium lead halide (CsPbBr3) nanocrystals, have emerged as a transformative sensing material due to their exceptional optoelectronic properties, including high photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY), narrow emission spectra, and tunable band gaps. The performance of these PQDs is intrinsically governed by their surface chemistry, where ligands play a critical role in stabilizing the nanocrystal, modulating its electronic properties, and facilitating specific interactions with target analytes. This technical guide explores the design principles for engineering PQD-based biosensors, focusing on the pivotal role of surface ligands in creating effective platforms for neurotransmitter detection, framed within the context of advanced materials research for biomedical applications.

The Critical Role of Surface Ligands in PQD Electronic Properties

Surface ligands on PQDs are not merely passive stabilizers but are active components that determine the electronic destiny of the nanocrystal. Their influence extends across several key performance parameters essential for biosensing.

Ligand Functions and Binding Dynamics

Ligands dynamically coordinate to the PQD surface, creating a complex equilibrium between different binding states. Research on PbS QDs reveals that beyond the classic two-state (bound/free) model, a three-state system exists for oleic acid (OAH) ligands: strongly bound (Sbound) oleate (OA) on Pb-rich (111) facets as X-type ligands, weakly bound (Wbound) OAH on (100) facets, and free ligands in solution [24]. The population fractions of these states are temperature- and concentration-dependent, influencing overall QD stability and function. This dynamic exchange directly affects electronic properties by governing surface defect density. Unpassivated "trap" states on the PQD surface act as non-radiative recombination centers, quenching photoluminescence and reducing charge carrier mobility. Effective ligand passivation, such as with methanesulfonate groups, saturates these coordination vacancies, leading to significant improvements in radiative recombination efficiency and carrier mobility, as demonstrated by a maximum external quantum efficiency (EQE) of 9.41% in Pe-LEDs [37].

Implications for Biosensor Design

For biosensors, the ligand shell is the primary interface with the biological environment. A well-designed ligand shell not only preserves the PQD's optoelectronic prowess in aqueous buffers but can also be functionalized with recognition elements (e.g., enzymes, aptamers) for specific neurotransmitter binding. Furthermore, ligands can be engineered to facilitate specific signal transduction mechanisms, such as electron transfer for electrochemical sensing or fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) for optical detection. Understanding the population kinetics and binding energetics of ligands is, therefore, the first step in rational biosensor design [24].

Biosensor Design Principles and Signaling Mechanisms

PQD-based biosensors for neurotransmitters primarily operate via optical or electrochemical signaling mechanisms, often leveraging the synergistic properties of PQD-composite materials.

Optical Detection: Fluorescence-Based Sensing

Fluorescent biosensors function by modulating the intense photoluminescence of PQDs upon analyte binding. A prominent design, as demonstrated in a 2025 study, integrates CsPbBr3 PQDs within a covalent organic framework (COF) to form a dual-mode sensing platform [38]. In this architecture, the COF scaffold provides a stable, porous matrix that protects the PQDs from the aqueous environment and enhances selectivity through π-π stacking interactions with the target neurotransmitter, dopamine (DA). The signaling mechanism involves the electron transfer from the PQD to dopamine, resulting in fluorescence quenching. The extent of quenching is quantitatively correlated to the dopamine concentration. This platform achieved an exceptional detection limit of 0.3 fM (femtomolar) for dopamine via fluorescence quenching [38].

Electrochemical Detection: Impedance and Voltammetry

Electrochemical biosensors transduce the binding event into an electrical signal. The same CsPbBr3-PQD-COF nanocomposite functions as a modified electrode. When dopamine binds to the COF surface, it alters the interfacial charge transfer properties, which is measured as a change in electrochemical impedance (EIS). This method provided a detection limit of 2.5 fM for dopamine, complementing the fluorescence mode [38]. Electrochemical techniques like differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) can also directly monitor the redox reaction of neurotransmitters, such as the conversion between dopamine and dopamine-o-quinone [39].

Dual-Mode and Visual Readout Systems

Multimodal sensing enhances reliability. The incorporation of a visual indicator like rhodamine B into the CsPbBr3-PQD-COF matrix creates a green-to-pink color shift under ambient light at dopamine concentrations above 100 pM, providing a simple, equipment-free qualitative assessment [38]. The following diagram illustrates the signaling pathways in a dual-mode PQD biosensor.

Experimental Protocol: Fabrication of a CsPbBr3-PQD-COF Dual-Mode Biosensor

This section provides a detailed methodology for constructing the referenced dual-mode dopamine sensor [38].

Synthesis of CsPbBr3 Perovskite Quantum Dots

Principle: A hot-injection method is used to achieve monodisperse PQDs with high crystallinity and PLQY.

• Materials: Lead(II) bromide (PbBr2, 99.999%), Cesium bromide (CsBr, 99.9%), Oleic acid (OA, 90%), Oleylamine (OAm, 80-90%), Anhydrous N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF), Anhydrous Toluene.
• Procedure:
  • Precursor Preparation: Co-dissolve 0.147 g (0.4 mmol) of PbBr2 and 0.085 g (0.4 mmol) of CsBr in 10 mL of anhydrous DMF in a three-neck flask under vigorous magnetic stirring.
  • Degassing: Purge the solution with high-purity nitrogen gas for 15 minutes to remove residual oxygen and water.
  • Ligand Injection: Inject 1 mL of oleic acid and 0.5 mL of oleylamine as capping ligands under continuous nitrogen flow.
  • Nucleation and Growth: Heat the mixture to 120°C at a controlled ramp rate of 5°C/min. Rapidly inject 0.5 mL of preheated toluene (60°C) to trigger instantaneous nucleation.
  • Reaction Quenching: After 10 seconds, immediately quench the reaction by placing the flask in an ice-water bath.
  • Purification: Purify the resulting colloidal dispersion (which exhibits green emission under UV light) by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 5 minutes. Wash the pellet twice with anhydrous toluene to remove unbound ligands and redisperse the final PQDs in 5 mL of anhydrous DMF.
• Quality Control: The as-synthesized PQDs should exhibit a sharp emission peak at ~515 nm and a PLQY of approximately 85%, measured using an integrating sphere.

Synthesis of COF Matrix and Integration with PQDs

Principle: A Schiff-base condensation forms the COF, which is then used as a host for PQD integration.

• Materials: 1,3,5-tris(4-aminophenyl)benzene (TAPB, 97%), 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalaldehyde (DHTA, 95%), Glacial acetic acid, Anhydrous DMF.
• COF Synthesis: Dissolve 0.035 g (0.1 mmol) of TAPB and 0.025 g (0.15 mmol) of DHTA in 5 mL of anhydrous DMF. Add 100 μL of glacial acetic acid as a catalyst and stir the reaction mixture at ambient temperature for 2 hours, forming a bright yellow suspension.
• PQD Integration: The specific integration method (e.g., in-situ growth of COF around PQDs or post-synthetic infiltration) should be optimized. The resulting CsPbBr3-PQD-COF nanocomposite is the active sensing material.

Sensor Fabrication and Dopamine Detection Assay

• Electrode Modification: Drop-cast the CsPbBr3-PQD-COF nanocomposite suspension onto a pre-cleaned glassy carbon electrode and allow it to dry.
• Fluorescence Measurement: Excite the modified electrode or a film of the nanocomposite at a suitable wavelength (e.g., 365 nm). Monitor the emission intensity at 515 nm while introducing dopamine samples. The intensity will decrease with increasing dopamine concentration.
• Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS): Perform EIS on the modified electrode in a standard electrochemical cell (e.g., in 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4) across a frequency range (e.g., 0.1 Hz to 100 kHz) with a small AC amplitude (e.g., 5 mV). The charge transfer resistance (Rct) will change with dopamine binding.
• Visual Readout: For qualitative assessment, observe the color of the RhB-incorporated nanocomposite film under ambient light. A green-to-pink shift is indicative of dopamine concentration exceeding ~100 pM.

Performance Metrics and Comparative Analysis

The performance of the PQD-based biosensor highlights the success of the material design, particularly the ligand and composite strategy.

Table 1: Performance Summary of a CsPbBr3-PQD-COF Dopamine Biosensor [38]

Performance Parameter	Fluorescence Mode	Electrochemical Mode (EIS)
Limit of Detection (LOD)	0.3 fM	2.5 fM
Linear Detection Range	1 fM to 500 μM	1 fM to 500 μM
Selectivity (against interferents like AA, UA)	Minimal cross-reactivity (<6%)	Minimal cross-reactivity (<6%)
Real-Sample Recovery (Human Serum)	97.5% - 103.8%	97.5% - 103.8%
Stability	>30 days	>30 days
Additional Visual Readout	Green-to-pink color shift at >100 pM	N/A

Table 2: The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents for PQD Biosensor Development

Reagent / Material	Function / Role in Experiment	Technical Notes
CsBr & PbBr2	Precursors for the inorganic perovskite lattice.	High purity (≥99.9%) is critical to minimize defects and non-radiative recombination.
Oleic Acid (OA) & Oleylamine (OAm)	Native L-type and X-type surface ligands.	Control nanocrystal growth, provide colloidal stability, and passivate surface traps. Dynamic binding equilibrium is key [24].
TAPB & DHTA	Covalent organic framework (COF) precursors.	Form an ordered, porous π-conjugated scaffold that enhances stability and selectivity.
Rhodamine B	Visual indicator dye.	Provides a qualitative colorimetric readout (green-to-pink) for high-concentration detection.
Dopamine Hydrochloride	Target analyte (neurotransmitter).	Electron-donating ability enables fluorescence quenching and alters electrochemical impedance.
Sodium Methanesulfonate	Alternative passivating ligand.	The S=O group strongly interacts with perovskite, improving film morphology and radiative efficiency [37].

PQD-based biosensors represent a cutting-edge frontier in neurotransmitter detection, offering unparalleled sensitivity and multimodal functionality. The cornerstone of their performance lies in the meticulous engineering of surface ligands and composite matrices. Ligands dictate electronic properties, stability, and biorecognition capabilities, while materials like COFs provide the structural and chemical environment necessary for operation in complex biological media. Future developments will likely involve the creation of more sophisticated ligand architectures for enhanced specificity, the integration of artificial intelligence for data interpretation and sensor optimization [40], and the push towards miniaturized, implantable devices for real-time, in vivo monitoring of neurological activity. The continued refinement of surface chemistry will undoubtedly unlock the full potential of PQDs, solidifying their role in the next generation of diagnostic and research tools for neuroscience.

Overcoming Challenges: Strategies for Optimizing Ligand Performance and PQD Stability

Surface ligands are integral to the stability and functionality of perovskite quantum dot (PQD) solids, serving as a primary determinant of their electronic properties and resilience to environmental degradation [41] [22]. These molecular structures cap the inorganic PQD core, preserving its crystal structure and optoelectronic characteristics. However, the dynamic nature of the bond between ligands and the PQD surface often leads to detachment, creating surface defects that act as centers for non-radiative recombination and initiating phase transition from the photoactive black phase to an inactive yellow δ-phase [42] [22]. The central challenge in PQD research lies in designing ligand architectures with optimized binding affinity to ensure robust surface passivation while facilitating efficient charge transport between adjacent QDs. This whitepaper examines the fundamental relationship between ligand binding affinity and environmental instability, presenting recent advances in ligand engineering that pave the way for commercially viable PQD technologies.

The Critical Role of Surface Ligands in PQD Stability and Electronic Properties

Surface ligands on PQDs fulfill two crucial yet often conflicting functions: structural passivation and electronic coupling. During synthesis, long-chain insulating ligands like oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OLA) maintain colloidal stability and disperse PQDs in non-polar solvents [42] [43]. These ligands induce negative surface tension, creating tensile strain that stabilizes the black perovskite phase at room temperature [42]. However, in solid films, these same insulating ligands create significant charge transport barriers, necessitating exchange with shorter conductive alternatives [22] [1].

The process of ligand exchange introduces instability vulnerabilities. Removal of pristine long-chain ligands often generates surface defects (cation and halide vacancies) and relaxes beneficial tensile strain, accelerating degradation [42]. Furthermore, conventional ester antisolvents like methyl acetate (MeOAc) inefficiently hydrolyze into target ligands under ambient conditions, resulting in incomplete surface coverage [1]. The binding affinity of replacement ligands directly correlates with passivation effectiveness, determining both electronic properties (carrier mobility, doping density) and environmental stability against moisture, oxygen, and phase transition [41] [22].

Table 1: Impact of Ligand Properties on PQD Characteristics

Ligand Property	Impact on Electronic Properties	Impact on Stability
Chain Length	Shorter chains increase dot-to-dot electronic coupling and charge mobility [22] [43]	Optimal length balances transport with phase stabilization [42]
Binding Group	Multifunctional groups (e.g., thiophene + ammonium) enhance passivation via chelation effect [42]	Strong binding reduces ligand detachment, improving ambient stability [42] [1]
Surface Coverage	Higher coverage reduces trap-state density [43]	Complete coverage protects against moisture ingress and phase transition [1]
Ionic Size	Larger organic cations (vs. Cs⁺) restore tensile strain, stabilizing black phase [42]	Appropriate size mitigates lattice distortion during exchange [42]

Quantitative Analysis of Ligand Engineering Strategies

Multifunctional Anchoring Ligands

The introduction of 2-thiophenemethylammonium iodide (ThMAI) represents a breakthrough in multifaceted surface anchoring [42]. This ligand combines distinct functional groups that simultaneously address multiple instability pathways: the thiophene ring (Lewis base) binds strongly to uncoordinated Pb²⁺ sites, while the ammonium group efficiently occupies cationic Cs⁺ vacancies. This coordinated passivation reduces surface defects that would otherwise facilitate phase transition.

The larger ionic radius of ThMA⁺ compared to Cs⁺ helps restore surface tensile strain diminished during ligand exchange, further stabilizing the black phase [42]. Devices treated with ThMAI demonstrated a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 15.3% with dramatically enhanced stability, retaining 83% of initial PCE after 15 days in ambient conditions compared to only 8.7% for control devices [42].

Alkali-Augmented Antisolvent Hydrolysis

Recent research addresses the fundamental limitation of ester antisolvent hydrolysis through an alkali-augmented antisolvent hydrolysis (AAAH) strategy [1]. By creating alkaline environments with potassium hydroxide (KOH) paired with methyl benzoate (MeBz) antisolvent, ester hydrolysis becomes thermodynamically spontaneous with activation energy reduced by approximately 9-fold.

This approach enables rapid substitution of pristine insulating oleate ligands with up to twice the conventional amount of hydrolyzed conductive counterparts [1]. The resulting PQD solids exhibit fewer trap-states, homogeneous orientations, and minimal particle agglomerations. Solar cells fabricated using this method achieved a certified efficiency of 18.3%, among the highest reported for PQD photovoltaics, alongside improved operational stability [1].

Conjugated Short-Chain Ligands

The use of phenethylammonium iodide (PEAI) in a layer-by-layer (LBL) solid-state exchange strategy demonstrates how conjugated molecular structures can balance conductivity and stability [43]. The phenyl group in PEA⁺ provides enhanced inter-dot coupling through π-π stacking interactions while effectively passivating surface defects.

This approach regulates balanced electron and hole transport within CsPbI₃ PQD films, enabling bifunctional devices that function as both solar cells (14.18% PCE) and light-emitting diodes [43]. Unencapsulated devices maintained excellent stability under high-humidity environments (30-50% RH), attributed to the hydrophobic nature of the phenyl group [43].

Table 2: Performance Metrics of Ligand Engineering Approaches

Ligand Strategy	Power Conversion Efficiency	Stability Retention	Key Improvement
ThMAI Treatment [42]	15.3%	83% after 15 days	Multifunctional anchoring
AAAH Strategy [1]	18.3% (certified)	Improved operational stability	Enhanced hydrolysis efficiency
PEAI-LBL [43]	14.18%	Excellent moisture stability	Balanced carrier transport
Conventional OA/OAm [42]	13.6%	8.7% after 15 days	Baseline reference

Experimental Protocols for Advanced Ligand Exchange

Multifaceted Anchoring with ThMAI Ligands

Materials: CsPbI₃ PQDs synthesized via hot-injection method, 2-thiophenemethylammonium iodide (ThMAI), n-hexane, n-octane, ethyl acetate [42].

Procedure:

• Synthesize CsPbI₃ PQDs stabilized with OA and OLA ligands using standard hot-injection method
• Purify PQDs through centrifugation and redispersion in n-hexane or n-octane
• Prepare ThMAI solution in ethyl acetate at optimized concentration
• Execute ligand exchange via layer-by-layer deposition:
  • Spin-coat PQD solution onto substrate
  • Treat film with ThMAI solution while spinning
  • Wash with pure ethyl acetate to remove byproducts
  • Repeat process to build desired film thickness
• Anneal films at mild temperature (70-90°C) to improve ligand ordering [42]

Characterization: TEM analysis confirms uniform PQD orientation and size distribution (≈11 nm). UV-Vis absorption and photoluminescence spectra verify preserved optical properties with reduced trap-state density. X-ray diffraction confirms maintenance of black phase structure [42].

Alkali-Augmented Antisolvent Hydrolysis (AAAH)

Materials: FA₀.₄₇Cs₀.₅₃PbI₃ PQDs, methyl benzoate (MeBz), potassium hydroxide (KOH), 2-pentanol [1].

Procedure:

• Prepare hybrid FA₀.₄₇Cs₀.₅₃PbI₃ PQDs via post-synthetic cation exchange from CsPbI₃ parent
• Create alkaline antisolvent by adding controlled KOH concentration to MeBz
• Assemble light-absorbing layer via layer-by-layer deposition:
  • Spin-coat PQD solution to form film
  • Rinse with KOH/MeBz solution under ambient conditions (~30% RH)
  • Allow sufficient hydrolysis time for conductive ligand formation
  • Remove residual antisolvent through evaporation
• Perform post-treatment with cationic ligand salts dissolved in 2-pentanol
• Complete device fabrication with electrode deposition [1]

Characterization: FTIR spectroscopy confirms replacement of OA ligands with hydrolyzed products. Space-charge-limited current (SCLC) measurements show reduced trap-state density. Grazing-incidence wide-angle X-ray scattering (GIWAXS) reveals homogeneous crystallographic orientation [1].

Visualization of Ligand Exchange Strategies

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Reagents for PQD Ligand Engineering Research

Reagent/Chemical	Function in Research	Application Note
2-Thiophenemethylammonium Iodide (ThMAI)	Multifunctional anchoring ligand for enhanced passivation [42]	Simultaneously passivates cationic and anionic surface defects
Phenethylammonium Iodide (PEAI)	Conjugated short-chain ligand for LBL exchange [43]	Provides balanced charge transport with phenyl conjugation
Methyl Benzoate (MeBz)	Ester antisolvent for interlayer rinsing [1]	Hydrolyzes to benzoate ligands with stronger binding than acetate
Potassium Hydroxide (KOH)	Alkaline additive for enhanced ester hydrolysis [1]	Creates thermodynamic spontaneity for hydrolysis reaction
Oleic Acid (OA) / Oleylamine (OLA)	Primal long-chain ligands for synthesis [42] [43]	Provides initial colloidal stability but requires replacement
Formamidinium Iodide (FAI)	A-site cationic ligand for post-treatment [43]	Enhances electronic coupling but may compromise phase stability

The strategic engineering of surface ligand binding affinity represents the most promising avenue for resolving the instability challenges that impede commercial application of perovskite quantum dots. The developments in multifaceted anchoring, alkali-augmented hydrolysis, and conjugated ligand systems demonstrate that rational ligand design can simultaneously address electronic and environmental stability requirements. Future research directions should focus on developing computational models to predict ligand-PQD binding energies, exploring solid-state ligand exchange processes that minimize solvent exposure, and designing multi-ligand systems that compartmentalize passivation and charge transport functions. As binding affinity quantification methods become more sophisticated, the correlation between molecular structure and device longevity will enable a new generation of PQD materials capable of withstanding operational demands while maintaining optimal electronic properties.

Perovskite quantum dots (PQDs), particularly lead halide variants like CsPbI3 and FAPbI3, represent a transformative class of semiconducting nanomaterials for next-generation photovoltaics. Their exceptional optoelectronic properties—including high absorption coefficients, tunable bandgaps, and superior defect tolerance—position them as promising candidates for high-efficiency, solution-processed solar cells [44] [45]. However, a fundamental contradiction plagues their development: the very long-chain insulating ligands (e.g., oleic acid and oleylamine) essential for synthesizing high-quality, colloidally stable PQDs severely impede charge transport between adjacent dots in solid films [4] [42]. This insulating layer creates significant charge transport barriers, limiting the photogenerated current and overall power conversion efficiency (PCE) of PQD solar cells (PQDSCs). Consequently, replacing these native long-chain ligands with shorter, conductive counterparts is not merely an optimization step but a critical prerequisite for unlocking the photovoltaic potential of PQDs. This whitepaper examines the latest conductive ligand solutions, framing them within the broader research context of manipulating PQD surface chemistry to master electronic properties.

Core Challenge: The Insulating Nature of Native Ligands

The ligand exchange procedure is indispensable for fabricating thick and conductive PQD solids for photovoltaics. Initially, monodispersed PQDs are synthesized using long alkyl chain ligands like oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OLA), which ensure high crystallinity and prevent aggregation during storage [4] [45]. While effective for synthesis and colloidal stability, these ligands act as insulating barriers in solid films, dramatically reducing the inter-dot charge transport ability and limiting the achievable device efficiency [4] [42]. The conventional solution involves a two-step solid-state ligand exchange process to replace these long-chain insulators with shorter, more conductive ligands. Typically, the anionic OA ligands are first replaced with short-chain anions like acetate using methyl acetate-based solutions. Subsequently, the cationic OLA ligands are exchanged for short-chain ammonium ions (e.g., phenethylammonium iodide) using ethyl acetate-based solutions [4]. While this process enhances conductivity, it introduces new challenges. The polar solvents used can strip away not only the intended ligands but also essential surface ions (Pb²⁺, Cs⁺, I⁻), generating surface traps such as uncoordinated Pb²⁺ sites. These traps act as non-radiative recombination centers, degrade optoelectrical properties, and create pathways for destructive environmental species like oxygen and moisture, thereby compromising both performance and ambient stability [4] [45].

Conductive Ligand Solutions and Mechanisms

Advanced ligand engineering strategies have been developed to simultaneously enhance conductivity and passivate surface defects. These approaches can be categorized into several paradigms, each with a distinct molecular mechanism.

Covalent Ligands in Nonpolar Solvents

This strategy addresses the destructive nature of polar solvents used in conventional ligand exchange. Using covalent short-chain ligands like triphenylphosphine oxide (TPPO) dissolved in nonpolar solvents (e.g., octane) preserves the PQD surface components while strongly passivating surface traps [4]. The TPPO ligand coordinates covalently to uncoordinated Pb²⁺ sites via Lewis-base interactions. This interaction is stronger than the labile ionic bonds formed by conventional ligands, leading to more robust and durable passivation. The nonpolar solvent octane completely preserves the PQD surface components, preventing the loss of metal cations and halides that occurs with polar solvents. This synergetic effect results in PQD photovoltaic absorbers with higher optoelectrical properties and ambient stability, enabling solar cells with a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 15.4% that retain over 90% of their initial efficiency after 18 days in ambient conditions [4].

Alkali-Augmented Antisolvent Hydrolysis

This approach enhances the conventional ester antisolvent rinsing process by creating an alkaline environment that facilitates more efficient ligand exchange [1]. Conventional ester antisolvents like methyl acetate (MeOAc) hydrolyze inefficiently under ambient conditions, generating an insufficient quantity of short ligands (e.g., acetate) to replace the pristine insulating oleate ligands. The robust C-O-CH₃ bonding in esters hinders hydrolysis spontaneity. Introducing an alkali, such as potassium hydroxide (KOH), coupled with an optimized ester antisolvent like methyl benzoate (MeBz), renders ester hydrolysis thermodynamically spontaneous and lowers the reaction activation energy by approximately nine-fold [1]. This enables the rapid substitution of pristine insulating ligands with up to twice the conventional amount of hydrolyzed conductive counterparts. The resulting PQD solids exhibit fewer trap-states, homogeneous orientations, and minimal particle agglomerations, leading to a certified efficiency of 18.3% for hybrid FA₀.₄₇Cs₀.₅₃PbI₃ PQDSCs [1].

Multifaceted Anchoring Ligands

This strategy employs ligands with multiple functional groups that can simultaneously address different types of surface defects and induce beneficial strain. A prime example is 2-thiophenemethylammonium iodide (ThMAI) [42]. ThMAI features an electron-rich thiophene ring and an ammonium group, creating a significant dipole moment. The thiophene ring, acting as a Lewis base, robustly binds to uncoordinated Pb²⁺ sites, while the ammonium group occupies cationic Cs⁺ vacancies. This multifaceted anchoring provides more comprehensive surface passivation compared to single-functional ligands. Furthermore, the larger ionic size of the ThMA⁺ cation compared to Cs⁺ helps restore tensile strain on the PQD surface, enhancing the stability of the photoactive black phase. This combination of effects results in improved carrier lifetime, uniform PQD orientation, and enhanced ambient stability, yielding a PCE of 15.3% for CsPbI₃ PQDSCs [42].

Sequential Multiligand Exchange

This methodology involves a sequential process to replace both anionic and cationic ligands with optimized short-chain molecules. For FAPbI₃ PQDs, a sequential solid-state multiligand exchange using a solution of 3-mercaptopropionic acid (MPA) and formamidinium iodide (FAI) in methyl acetate (MeOAc) effectively replaces long-chain octylamine and oleic acid [14]. The short-chain MPA provides strong binding to the surface, while FAI helps maintain the perovskite structure. This process significantly enhances thin-film conductivity and quality by reducing inter-dot spacing and defects, thereby mitigating vacancy-assisted ion migration. This approach led to a 28% improvement in PCE for n-i-p solar cells, along with reduced hysteresis and improved stability [14].

Table 1: Performance Summary of Conductive Ligand Strategies

Ligand Strategy	PQD Material	Key Improvement	Reported PCE	Stability Retention
Covalent Ligands (TPPO in Octane) [4]	CsPbI₃	Strong covalent binding to Pb²⁺; preserved surface components	15.4%	>90% after 18 days
Alkali-Augmented Hydrolysis (KOH/MeBz) [1]	FA₀.₄₇Cs₀.₅₃PbI₃	Doubled ligand density; fewer trap-states	18.3% (Certified)	Improved storage & operational stability
Multifaceted Anchoring (ThMAI) [42]	CsPbI₃	Bidentate passivation; restored lattice strain	15.3%	83% after 15 days
Sequential Multiligand (MPA/FAI) [14]	FAPbI₃	Reduced inter-dot spacing; suppressed ion migration	28% improvement vs. control	Improved stability

The logical relationships and comparative effectiveness of these ligand engineering strategies are synthesized in the following conceptual pathway.

Experimental Protocols for Key Ligand Strategies

This protocol describes the post-ligand-exchange treatment of CsPbI₃ PQD solids to passivate surface traps.

• Materials:

  • Ligand-exchanged CsPbI₃ PQD solid films (fabricated via conventional layer-by-layer method using MeOAc and EtOAc solutions).
  • Triphenylphosphine oxide (TPPO) ligand.
  • Anhydrous n-octane solvent.

• Procedure:

  • Prepare a TPPO ligand solution by dissolving TPPO in n-octane at a specified concentration.
  • After the final layer of ligand-exchanged CsPbI₃ PQD solid is deposited, treat the film by dynamically spin-coating the TPPO solution in octane onto the film.
  • Spin-coat at specified parameters (e.g., 3000 rpm for 30 seconds) to ensure uniform coverage and effective infiltration of the TPPO solution into the PQD solid.
  • Anneal the treated film on a hotplate at a moderate temperature (e.g., 70°C for 5 minutes) to remove residual solvent and promote ligand binding.

• Validation:

  • Photoluminescence (PL) Spectroscopy: A significant increase in PL intensity and lifetime compared to the control film confirms reduced non-radiative recombination.
  • Fourier-Transform Infrared (FT-IR) Spectroscopy: Verifies the presence of TPPO on the PQD surface and the successful passivation.

This protocol details the interlayer rinsing process for PQD solids to achieve a high density of conductive capping ligands.

• Materials:

  • Colloidal solution of PQDs (e.g., FA₀.₄₇Cs₀.₅₃PbI₃).
  • Methyl benzoate (MeBz) antisolvent.
  • Potassium hydroxide (KOH).

• Procedure:

  • Prepare the alkaline antisolvent by adding a controlled, small amount of KOH to methyl benzoate.
  • Spin-coat the colloidal PQD solution onto a substrate to form an "as-cast" film.
  • Immediately after deposition, while the film is still wet, rinse the film by dynamically dripping the KOH/MeBz antisolvent solution onto the spinning substrate.
  • Repeat the spin-coating and rinsing steps in a layer-by-layer manner until the desired film thickness is achieved.
  • Perform a final post-treatment with a solution of short cationic ligands (e.g., in 2-pentanol) to complete the surface engineering.

• Validation:

  • ¹H NMR Spectroscopy: Quantifies the removal of pristine long-chain ligands and the incorporation of hydrolyzed short ligands.
  • TEM and SEM: Reveal denser packing, minimal agglomeration, and homogeneous morphology.
  • J-V Characterization: A certified PCE of 18.3% and high steady-state efficiency validate the effectiveness of the approach.

Table 2: The Scientist's Toolkit - Essential Research Reagents

Reagent / Material	Function / Role in Ligand Engineering	Key Considerations
Methyl Acetate (MeOAc) [4] [14]	Polar antisolvent for initial interlayer rinsing and replacement of anionic OA ligands with acetate.	High polarity can strip surface ions; hydrolysis under ambient humidity is inefficient.
Methyl Benzoate (MeBz) [1]	Ester antisolvent with suitable polarity; hydrolyzes to benzoate, which has superior binding to PQD surface compared to acetate.	Preferred for its balanced polarity and the robust binding of its hydrolysis product.
Triphenylphosphine Oxide (TPPO) [4]	Covalent Lewis-base ligand for post-exchange passivation of uncoordinated Pb²⁺ sites.	Requires dissolution in a non-polar solvent (e.g., octane) to prevent damaging the PQD surface.
2-Thiophenemethylammonium Iodide (ThMAI) [42]	Multifaceted anchoring ligand for defect passivation and strain engineering.	The thiophene group binds Pb²⁺; the ammonium group fills A-site vacancies; large size induces strain.
3-Mercaptopropionic Acid (MPA) [14]	Short-chain, bidentate ligand for sequential multiligand exchange.	Thiol group offers strong binding to the perovskite surface; effective in hybrid multiligand systems.
Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) [1]	Alkali additive to augment the hydrolysis of ester antisolvents.	Lowers activation energy for hydrolysis, making it spontaneous and rapid; concentration must be carefully controlled.

The development of conductive ligand solutions is a pivotal research frontier in the quest to commercialize perovskite quantum dot photovoltaics. The strategies outlined—ranging from covalent ligands and alkali-augmented hydrolysis to multifaceted anchors and sequential multiligand exchange—demonstrate that sophisticated surface chemistry is key to mitigating charge transport barriers. These approaches move beyond simply replacing long chains with short ones; they aim to create a robust, conductive, and stable interface that minimizes non-radiative recombination and enhances charge extraction. The consistent correlation between advanced ligand engineering, improved PCE, and enhanced device stability underscores that surface ligand management is inextricably linked to the ultimate electronic properties of PQD solids. Future research will likely focus on the combinatorial application of these strategies, the development of novel multi-functional ligands, and the refinement of these processes for scalable, industrially viable manufacturing. By continuing to decode and engineer the ligand-PQD interface, researchers can further close the efficiency gap with theoretical limits and pave the way for stable, high-performance quantum dot photovoltaics.

Within the broader research on the role of surface ligands in perovskite quantum dot (PQD) electronic properties, surface passivation stands as a definitive factor influencing charge carrier dynamics, operational stability, and ultimate device performance. Colloidal quantum dots (QDs) and perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) possess high surface-to-volume ratios, making their optical and electronic characteristics exceptionally susceptible to surface chemistry [41] [46]. While traditional single-ligand passivation strategies have driven initial progress, they often struggle to simultaneously address the diverse surface defect types and maintain colloidal and structural integrity. This limitation has catalyzed the development of advanced complementary dual-ligand systems, which employ strategically chosen ligand pairs to synergistically passivate different surface sites and fulfill multiple functional roles. This technical guide delves into the mechanistic principles, experimental protocols, and electronic outcomes of these sophisticated passivation techniques, providing a framework for their rational design and implementation in high-performance optoelectronic devices.

Fundamental Principles of Dual-Ligand Passivation

The efficacy of any surface passivation strategy is governed by its ability to suppress non-radiative recombination pathways originating from surface defects. Dual-ligand reconstruction operates on the principle of functional complementarity, where two distinct ligands are employed to address different limitations inherent to single-ligand systems.

The Problem of Surface Defects and Single-Ligand Limitations

Quantum dot surfaces are typically characterized by undercoordinated ions (e.g., Pb²⁺ in lead-based QDs), ion vacancies (e.g., I⁻ vacancies), and the presence of residual groups from synthesis (e.g., hydroxyl groups) [47]. A single ligand, such as oleic acid (OA) or oleylamine (OAm), is often incapable of effectively passivating all these defect types simultaneously. For instance, in Cs₂NaInCl₆ double perovskite QDs, research confirmed that only OAm was directly bound to the QD surface and played a significant role in improving photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) by passivating surface defects, whereas OA was not bound but played a critical part in enhancing the colloidal stability of the QDs [46]. This functional separation highlights the inherent limitation of relying on a single molecule.

The Complementary Dual-Ligand Mechanism

A complementary dual-ligand system assigns distinct roles to each ligand to create a synergistic effect. The primary goals are:

• Trap Passivation: Direct coordination with undercoordinated surface cations (e.g., Pb²⁺) to eliminate electronic states within the bandgap that act as traps for charge carriers [10].
• Vacancy Suppression: Occupying anion vacancy sites or reducing their formation energy, thereby suppressing the generation of defects that lead to non-radiative recombination [47].
• Stability Enhancement: Providing a robust hydrophobic shell to protect the ionic perovskite surface from environmental degradation [46].
• Charge Transport Optimization: Using shorter chain ligands or those that facilitate inter-dot coupling to enhance the mobility of charge carriers through the solid film [41] [47].

Table 1: Common Ligand Functional Groups and Their Primary Roles in Dual-Ligand Systems

Ligand/Functional Group	Primary Function	Effect on QD Properties
Amine Group (-NH₂)	Coordinates with undercoordinated Pb²⁺ ions	Reduces electron trapping sites; improves PLQY [46]
Carboxylic Acid (-COOH)	Binds to surface cations; often used in synthesis	Enhances colloidal stability and dispersion [46]
Thiol Group (-SH)	Strongly coordinates with metal sites; can replace long-chain ligands	Passivates traps and reduces inter-dot distance, improving conductivity [47]
Phosphine Oxide (=P=O)	Binds strongly to Pb²⁺ ions	Effectively suppresses non-radiative recombination [10]
Halide Ions (I⁻, Br⁻)	Occupies halogen vacancy sites	Reduces hole traps; improves intrinsic stability [47]

Experimental Protocols for Dual-Ligand Systems

Implementing a successful dual-ligand passivation strategy requires precise control over synthesis and processing parameters. Below are detailed methodologies for two prominent systems cited in recent literature.

This one-step ligand exchange and passivation method is designed to simultaneously address undercoordinated Pb sites and residual OH groups.

Research Reagent Solutions:

• Lead Acetate (PbAc₂): Pb precursor.
• Hexamethyldisilathiane (TMS): S source.
• Oleic Acid (OA) & 1-Octadecene (ODE): Standard ligands/solvents for synthesis.
• Lead Iodide (PbI₂): Inorganic halide source for I⁻ passivation.
• 3-Mercaptopropionic Acid (MPA): Short-chain thiol ligand for trap passivation and charge transport.

Detailed Procedure:

• Synthesis of Oleate-Capped PbS QDs: Synthesize PbS QDs using a standard hot-injection method. Combine PbAc₂, OA, and ODE in a flask. Degas and heat under a nitrogen atmosphere. Rapidly inject TMS solution to initiate nucleation and growth. Terminate the reaction by cooling to obtain the OA-capped PbS QD solution.
• Preparation of Dual Ligand Solution: Prepare a ligand exchange solution in DMF containing both PbI₂ and MPA. The optimal molar ratio of PbI₂ to MPA was found to be 1:0.07 [47].
• One-Step Ligand Exchange: Add the purified OA-capped PbS QDs to the dual ligand solution. Stir the mixture vigorously for several minutes to allow the complete replacement of the long-chain OA ligands with the shorter PbI₂ and MPA ligands.
• Purification and Film Formation: Precipitate the passivated QDs using a non-solvent (e.g., hexane), then centrifuge to collect the solid. Redisperse the QD solid in an appropriate solvent (e.g., butylamine) to create an ink. Deposit the ink onto a substrate via layer-by-layer spin-coating to form a solid film ready for device fabrication.

This method focuses on post-synthetic surface treatment to enhance the optical properties and photostability of CsPbI₃ PQDs.

Research Reagent Solutions:

• Cesium Carbonate (Cs₂CO₃) & Lead Iodide (PbI₂): Perovskite precursors.
• 1-Octadecene (ODE), Oleic Acid (OA), Oleylamine (OAm): Solvents and ligands for synthesis.
• Trioctylphosphine (TOP) & Trioctylphosphine Oxide (TOPO): Lewis base ligands for defect passivation.

Detailed Procedure:

• Synthesis of CsPbI₃ PQDs: Use a hot-injection technique. Prepare Cs-oleate precursor separately. Heat a mixture of PbI₂, ODE, OA, and OAm to the target synthesis temperature (e.g., 170 °C was found optimal [10]). Swiftly inject the Cs-oleate precursor to form CsPbI₃ PQDs. Cool the reaction mixture rapidly after a short growth period.
• Purification of Native PQDs: Isroduce the crude solution with a non-solvent (e.g., ethyl acetate) and centrifuge at high speed to obtain a PQD pellet. Discard the supernatant.
• Ligand Passivation Treatment: Redissolve the PQD pellet in hexane. Introduce TOP and TOPO into the solution. The phosphine groups in TOP and TOPO coordinate with undercoordinated Pb²⁺ ions on the PQD surface. Stir the solution to ensure complete surface interaction.
• Final Purification and Storage: Precipitate and centrifuge the passivated PQDs once more to remove excess ligands. Finally, disperse the PQDs in anhydrous hexane or toluene for storage and subsequent film deposition.

Figure 1: Generalized experimental workflow for implementing a dual-ligand passivation strategy on quantum dots, covering synthesis, ligand exchange, and characterization.

Quantitative Performance and Comparative Analysis

The implementation of dual-ligand strategies has yielded measurable improvements in key performance metrics across various QD and PQD systems. The following tables consolidate quantitative data from the literature, providing a clear comparison of device and material performance.

Table 2: Performance Enhancement in PbS QD Solar Cells with PbI₂/MPA Dual Ligand Passivation [47]

Photovoltaic Parameter	Single Ligand (PbI₂)	Dual Ligand (PbI₂/MPA)	Relative Improvement
Power Conversion Efficiency (PCE)	5.36 %	6.75 %	+25.9 %
Short-Circuit Current Density (Jₛ꜀)	25.33 mA/cm²	27.48 mA/cm²	+8.5 %
Open-Circuit Voltage (Vₒ꜀)	507.8 mV	521.2 mV	+2.6 %
Fill Factor (FF)	0.417	0.525	+25.9 %

The data in Table 2 demonstrates that the dual-ligand approach significantly enhances the fill factor and overall efficiency, indicative of reduced trap-assisted recombination and improved charge transport in the QD solid [47].

Table 3: Impact of Ligand Passivation on Optical Properties of CsPbI₃ PQDs [10]

Ligand Treatment	Relative PL Enhancement	Key Functional Role
L-Phenylalanine (L-PHE)	+3 %	Molecular passivation of surface defects.
Trioctylphosphine (TOP)	+16 %	Lewis base coordination with undercoordinated Pb²⁺.
Trioctylphosphine Oxide (TOPO)	+18 %	Strong Lewis base coordination; effective defect suppression.

Furthermore, the L-PHE-modified PQDs exhibited superior photostability, retaining over 70% of their initial PL intensity after 20 days of continuous UV exposure, underscoring the role of ligands in enhancing durability [10].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

The following table catalogs key materials and their functions for research in dual-ligand passivation of PQDs.

Table 4: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Dual-Ligand Experiments

Reagent / Material	Function / Purpose	Example Use Case
Lead Iodide (PbI₂)	Inorganic halide source; provides I⁻ ions to passivate iodine vacancies.	Suppressing I⁻ vacancies in PbS and CsPbI₃ QDs [47] [10].
3-Mercaptopropionic Acid (MPA)	Short-chain thiol ligand; replaces long-chain OA, improving charge transport and passivating Pb sites.	Dual ligand passivation in PbS QD solar cells [47].
Trioctylphosphine Oxide (TOPO)	Lewis base surfactant; strongly coordinates with undercoordinated Pb²⁺ ions.	Enhancing PLQY and stability of CsPbI₃ PQDs [10].
Oleylamine (OAm)	Long-chain amine surfactant; passivates surface defects and controls growth during synthesis.	Primary surface ligand in synthesis of various QDs; improves PLQY [46].
Oleic Acid (OA)	Long-chain carboxylic acid; standard surface ligand for colloidal stabilization during synthesis.	Providing initial colloidal stability; often replaced in ligand exchange [46].
Antimony Acetate (Sb(OAc)₃)	Dopant precursor; breaks parity-forbidden transitions in double perovskites to enable emission.	Activating blue emission in Cs₂NaInCl₆ double perovskite QDs [46].

The strategic reconstruction of the quantum dot surface using complementary dual-ligand systems represents a significant leap beyond conventional passivation paradigms. By assigning distinct and synergistic roles to multiple ligands—such as combining halide anions for vacancy repair with short-chain organic ligands for trap passivation and charge transport—researchers can concurrently address the multifaceted challenges of defect management, electronic coupling, and environmental stability [47] [10] [46]. The experimental protocols and quantitative data summarized in this guide provide a foundational toolkit for researchers and development professionals aiming to harness the full electronic potential of perovskite quantum dots. As the field progresses, the rational design of novel, multi-functional ligands guided by these principles will be instrumental in closing the gap towards the theoretical efficiency limits of quantum dot-based optoelectronic devices.

The electronic and optoelectronic properties of perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) are profoundly influenced by their surface chemistry, particularly the nature and density of the ligand capping layer. These ligands, which terminate the crystal structure of the PQDs, play a dual role: they stabilize the nanocrystals against degradation and mediate charge transport between adjacent dots in solid-state films. The dynamic binding nature of conventional long-chain insulating ligands (e.g., oleate - OA⁻) creates a fundamental trade-off between colloidal stability and electronic coupling. While essential for synthesis and processing, these native insulators create a physical and electronic barrier that impedes inter-dot charge transfer, critically limiting the performance of PQD-based devices such as solar cells and light-emitting diodes (LEDs) [1] [48].

Alkali-augmented hydrolysis has emerged as a powerful ligand engineering strategy to resolve this dichotomy. This approach manipulates the chemical environment during the ligand exchange process to fundamentally enhance the efficiency with which pristine insulating ligands are replaced by short, conductive counterparts. By rendering the hydrolysis of ester-based antisolvents thermodynamically spontaneous and kinetically favorable, the method enables the formation of a dense, conductive capping layer, thereby unlocking superior electronic properties in the resulting PQD solids [1]. This technical guide delineates the mechanistic principles, experimental protocols, and quantitative outcomes of this transformative technique, framing it within the broader research objective of mastering surface ligand control to tailor PQD electronic properties.

The AAAH Strategy: Mechanistic Principles

The Alkali-Augmented Antisolvent Hydrolysis (AAAH) strategy directly addresses the inherent inefficiency of conventional ester hydrolysis under ambient conditions, which is a cornerstone of ligand exchange in PQD solid films.

The Limitation of Conventional Ester Rinsing

In standard layer-by-layer processing of PQD light-absorbing layers, ester antisolvents like methyl acetate (MeOAc) serve a dual purpose: they remove the pristine long-chain ligands and, through ambient hydrolysis, theoretically provide shorter conductive ligands (e.g., acetate) for surface capping. However, the robust C-O-CH₃ bonding in these esters hinders spontaneous hydrolysis. Consequently, rinsing primarily induces the dissociation of dynamically bound OA⁻ ligands without sufficient substitution by hydrolyzed counterparts. This results in extensive surface vacancy defects that act as carrier traps, destabilize the PQD surface, and lead to undesirable aggregation during subsequent processing steps [1].

The Alkaline Enhancement

The introduction of an alkaline environment (e.g., with KOH) fundamentally alters the reaction landscape as shown in Table 1: Comparison of Conventional vs. Alkali-Augmented Ester Hydrolysis.

Table 1: Comparison of Conventional vs. Alkali-Augmented Ester Hydrolysis

Feature	Conventional Ester Rinsing	Alkali-Augmented Hydrolysis (AAAH)
Thermodynamic Spontaneity	Non-spontaneous	Rendered spontaneous
Activation Energy Barrier	High	Lowered by approximately 9-fold
Hydrolysis Rate	Slow, inefficient	Rapid, efficient
Ligand Substitution	Primarily ligand dissociation	Effective substitution with conductive ligands
Resulting Capping Density	Low, with vacancies	Up to 2x conventional density

Theoretical calculations confirm that the alkaline environment alters the reaction thermodynamics, making ester hydrolysis a spontaneous process. Kinetically, it lowers the activation energy for the hydrolysis reaction by approximately nine-fold. This dramatic reduction enables the rapid generation of short anionic ligands (e.g., benzoate from methyl benzoate) that effectively and robustly bind to the PQD surface, substituting the pristine OA⁻ ligands. This process can achieve up to twice the conventional amount of hydrolyzed conductive ligands on the PQD surface, creating a dense and integral conductive capping layer [1].

Experimental Protocols: Implementing the AAAH Strategy

This section provides detailed methodologies for implementing the AAAH strategy, from material selection to specific processing steps.

Research Reagent Solutions

The successful application of the AAAH strategy requires careful selection of reagents, each serving a specific function as outlined in Table 2: Key Research Reagents for AAAH Implementation.

Table 2: Key Research Reagents for AAAH Implementation

Reagent	Function/Description	Role in AAAH Strategy
Methyl Benzoate (MeBz)	Ester antisolvent with moderate polarity	Preferred antisolvent; hydrolyzes to conductive benzoate ligands for surface capping [1].
Potassium Hydroxide (KOH)	Alkaline source	Creates the alkaline environment to facilitate spontaneous ester hydrolysis [1].
FA₀.₄₇Cs₀.₅₃PbI₃ PQDs	Hybrid A-site lead iodide PQDs (~12.5 nm)	Model PQD system for demonstrating the AAAH strategy; exhibits high light absorption [1].
2-Pentanol (2-PeOH)	Protic solvent with moderate polarity	Ideal solvent for cationic ligand salts during post-treatment of PQD solid films [1].

Detailed Workflow for PQD Solid Film Treatment

The following protocol describes the application of AAAH during the interlayer rinsing of PQD solid films, a critical step in the layer-by-layer assembly of light-absorbing layers for devices like solar cells.

• PQD Solid Film Preparation: Spin-coat synthesized hybrid FA₀.₄₇Cs₀.₅₃PbI₃ PQDs (average size ~12.5 nm) onto a substrate to form an "as-cast" solid film covered with pristine oleate (OA⁻) and oleylammonium (OAm⁺) ligands [1].
• Alkali-Augmented Antisolvent Preparation: Introduce a carefully regulated concentration of KOH into methyl benzoate (MeBz) antisolvent. The alkalinity must be optimized to ensure adequate ligand exchange without compromising the structural integrity of the ionic perovskite core [1].
• Interlayer Rinsing: Under ambient conditions (e.g., ~30% relative humidity), rinse the PQD solid film with the KOH/MeBz solution. This step:
  • Removes the dynamically bound, pristine long-chain OA⁻ ligands.
  • Simultaneously, the alkaline environment rapidly hydrolyzes MeBz, generating benzoate ligands.
  • These short, conductive benzoate ligands substitute the OA⁻ ligands on the X-site of the PQD surface.
• Solvent Removal: The antisolvent, having a low boiling point, is rapidly and efficiently removed after rinsing, leaving a denser-packed PQD solid film [1].
• A-site Ligand Exchange (Optional Post-treatment): Upon achieving the desired film thickness, a post-treatment step can be performed. This involves applying a solution of short cationic ligands (e.g., formamidinium or phenethylammonium salts dissolved in 2-pentanol) to substitute the pristine OAm⁺ ligands on the A-site, further enhancing electronic coupling [1] [10].
• Layer-by-Layer Repetition: Repeat the spin-coating and alkaline-antisolvent rinsing steps to build up the thickness of the PQD light-absorbing layer.

Quantitative Performance and Characterization Data

The implementation of the AAAH strategy yields significant, quantifiable improvements in the properties of PQD solids and the performance of devices fabricated from them.

Material and Optoelectronic Properties

PQD solid films treated with the AAAH strategy exhibit superior characteristics compared to those processed with conventional neat ester antisolvents.

• Enhanced Capping Density: The method enables the substitution of pristine insulating ligands with up to twice the conventional amount of hydrolyzed conductive counterparts [1].
• Reduced Trap States: The robust and dense ligand capping leads to fewer surface vacancy defects, which manifest as a reduction in trap-assisted non-radiative recombination [1].
• Improved Morphology: The films demonstrate homogeneous crystallographic orientations and minimal particle agglomerations, resulting from the stabilized PQD surfaces [1].
• Superior Stability: The passivated surface contributes to enhanced stability. In related studies, ligand-passivated PQDs have demonstrated superior photostability, retaining over 70% of initial photoluminescence intensity after 20 days of UV exposure [10].

Device Performance Metrics

The enhancements in material properties directly translate to breakthrough performance in optoelectronic devices, particularly solar cells. Table 3 summarizes the photovoltaic parameters achieved using the AAAH strategy.

Table 3: Photovoltaic Performance of PQD Solar Cells via AAAH Strategy

Performance Parameter	Achieved Value	Context and Significance
Certified PCE	18.3%	Highest certified efficiency among published reports for hybrid A-site PQD solar cells at the time [1].
Steady-State Efficiency	17.85%	Confirms high performance under continuous operational conditions [1].
Average PCE (n=20 devices)	17.68%	Demonstrates excellent reproducibility and reliability of the method [1].
Jsc (Short-Circuit Current)	Higher than conventional	Benefitted from suitable tolerance factors and tailored lattice structures of hybrid PQDs [1].
Voc (Open-Circuit Voltage)	Lower deficit	Indicates reduced recombination losses, consistent with fewer trap states [1].

The AAAH strategy is also broadly compatible with diverse solid-state treatments and PQD compositions, demonstrating its universality in modulating PQD surface chemistry [1].

Mechanistic Pathway and Logical Workflow

The logical relationship between the alkaline environment, the chemical transformation, and the resulting electronic benefits is summarized in the following pathway diagram.

The alkali-augmented hydrolysis strategy represents a significant leap forward in the precise engineering of PQD surface chemistry. By overcoming the fundamental thermodynamic and kinetic limitations of conventional ester hydrolysis, this method enables the fabrication of PQD solids with a dense, conductive, and integral surface capping. The resultant materials exhibit fewer defects, superior stability, and optimal energy level alignment, which are directly responsible for the record-breaking efficiencies achieved in PQD solar cells. This technique provides researchers and scientists with a powerful, universal tool to manipulate the electronic properties of PQDs through surface ligand control, paving the way for the next generation of high-performance PQD-based optoelectronic devices.

The surface chemistry of perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) represents a central frontier in nanomaterials research, governing the critical trade-off between two paramount properties: electronic coupling in solid films and colloidal stability in solution. Native long-chain insulating ligands, such as oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OAm), are indispensable during synthesis for ensuring monodisperse, stable colloidal suspensions and preserving the structural integrity of the nanocrystals [43]. However, these very ligands become detrimental in optoelectronic devices, where they act as tunneling barriers, severely impeding charge transport between adjacent PQDs by maintaining excessive inter-dot distances [49] [42]. Consequently, surface ligand engineering—the controlled exchange of long-chain insulating ligands for shorter or more conductive alternatives—has emerged as a pivotal process for activating the electronic functionality of PQD films. This process is fraught with complexity; overly aggressive ligand stripping can create surface defects that trigger non-radiative recombination and degrade colloidal stability, leading to aggregation [10] [42]. This whitepaper delineates advanced ligand management strategies that successfully navigate this delicate balance, enabling high-performance PQD devices by simultaneously achieving superior electronic coupling and robust colloidal integrity.

Ligand Engineering Strategies and Their Impacts

Research has evolved from simple ligand exchanges to sophisticated multi-step and multi-component strategies designed to address the multifaceted challenges of PQD surface optimization.

Cascade Surface Modification (CSM)

The Cascade Surface Modification (CSM) strategy is a two-step solution-phase process that decouples surface passivation from doping/solubility control. This method directly addresses the steric hindrance that often prevents comprehensive surface passivation in single-step exchanges [49].

• Step 1 - Initial Halogenation: The native ligands are first replaced with lead halide anions (e.g., PbI₂). This provides a robust initial passivation of surface defects and yields n-type CQDs that are stable in polar solvents like dimethylformamide (DMF) [49].
• Step 2 - Surface Reprogramming: The halide-passivated surface is subsequently treated with a bifunctional thiol ligand (e.g., 1-thioglycerol-TG, cysteamine-CTA). The thiol group binds strongly to the CQD surface, while the terminal functional group (e.g., -NH₂, -OH) dictates both the doping character (shifting it to p-type) and the colloidal solubility in specific solvents like butylamine (BTA) [49].

Key Outcome: The CSM strategy produces n-type and p-type CQD inks that are fully miscible in the same solvent. This enables the fabrication of homogeneous CQD bulk homojunction films, which exhibit a 1.5-fold increase in carrier diffusion length and have led to record power conversion efficiencies (PCE) of 13.3% in CQD solar cells [49].

Short-Chain Conjugated Ligands and Layer-by-Layer (LBL) Processing

Phenethylammonium iodide (PEAI) is a prominent example of a short-chain, conjugated ligand used in solid-state ligand exchange. Its aromatic ring facilitates π-π stacking, enhancing electronic coupling between PQDs, while the ammonium group enables effective binding to the perovskite surface [43].

A modified PEAI layer-by-layer (LBL) process has been developed to improve upon conventional post-treatment methods. In this approach, the PEAI solution is applied immediately after the deposition and washing of each PQD layer, rather than only at the end of the entire film deposition [43]. This ensures more uniform and complete removal of OAm ligands throughout the entire film thickness, promoting better carrier transport and more effective defect passivation from the bottom layers up.

Key Outcome: Solar cells based on PEAI-LBL CsPbI3 PQDs achieved a champion PCE of 14.18% with a high open-circuit voltage of 1.23 V, while also exhibiting strong red electroluminescence, demonstrating balanced electron and hole injection [43].

Complementary Dual-Ligand and Multifunctional Anchoring Systems

To overcome the limitations of single-ligand approaches, researchers have developed systems where two different ligands work in concert.

One strategy employs trimethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate and phenylethyl ammonium iodide to form a complementary dual-ligand system on the PQD surface, stabilized by hydrogen bonds. This system maintains good colloidal dispersion while simultaneously improving inter-dot electronic coupling in the solid state, leading to a record PCE of 17.61% for inorganic PQD solar cells [2].

Another advanced ligand is 2-thiophenemethylammonium iodide (ThMAI), a multifaceted anchoring ligand. Its design incorporates an electron-rich thiophene ring that binds to uncoordinated Pb²⁺ sites and an ammonium group that occupies Cs⁺ vacancies. This dual-action passivation effectively suppresses surface defects. Furthermore, the large ionic size of the ThMA⁺ cation helps restore beneficial tensile strain on the PQD lattice, enhancing phase stability [42].

Key Outcome: ThMAI-treated CsPbI3 PQD solar cells showed a significantly improved PCE of 15.3% and dramatically enhanced ambient stability, retaining 83% of their initial PCE after 15 days, compared to a control device which retained only 8.7% [42].

The table below summarizes the performance enhancements achieved by the different ligand engineering strategies discussed.

Table 1: Performance Metrics of Advanced Ligand Engineering Strategies

Strategy	Key Ligand(s)	Reported Power Conversion Efficiency (PCE)	Key Stability & Optoelectronic Improvements
Cascade Surface Modification [49]	Lead Halide + 1-Thioglycerol (TG)	13.3% (CQD Solar Cell)	1.5x increase in carrier diffusion length; stable, miscible n-type and p-type inks.
Layer-by-Layer (LBL) Short Ligand [43]	Phenethylammonium Iodide (PEAI)	14.18%	High Voc (1.23 V); excellent electroluminescence; stability under high humidity.
Complementary Dual-Ligand [2]	Trimethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate & PEAI	17.61%	Improved environmental stability; uniform stacking orientation in PQD solids.
Multifunctional Anchoring Ligand [42]	2-Thiophenemethylammonium Iodide (ThMAI)	15.3%	Retained 83% of initial PCE after 15 days (vs. 8.7% for control).
Surface Passivation [10]	Trioctylphosphine Oxide (TOPO)	-	18% PL enhancement; retained >70% PL intensity after 20 days of UV exposure.

Experimental Protocols: From Synthesis to Film Fabrication

This section outlines detailed methodologies for key processes in PQD ligand engineering, providing a practical toolkit for researchers.

Synthesis of CsPbI3 PQDs via Hot-Injection

The following protocol is adapted from established hot-injection methods for synthesizing high-quality CsPbI3 PQDs [10] [42].

• Cs-Oleate Precursor: Load 0.407 g of Cs₂CO₃ into a 50 mL three-neck flask with 1.25 mL of OA and 18.75 mL of 1-octadecene (ODE). Heat under N₂ atmosphere to 120 °C with stirring until the Cs₂CO₃ is fully dissolved.
• Pb-I Precursor: In a separate 100 mL three-neck flask, combine 0.461 g of PbI₂, 2.5 mL of OA, 2.5 mL of OAm, and 35 mL of ODE. Heat under N₂ to 120 °C with stirring for 30 minutes until the solution becomes clear.
• Reaction Injection: Rapidly raise the temperature of the Pb-I precursor to 170 °C. Swiftly inject 2.5 mL of the preheated Cs-oleate solution into the reaction flask.
• Quenching and Purification: Allow the reaction to proceed for 10 seconds, then immediately cool the flask in an ice-water bath. Precipitate the PQDs by adding anhydrous hexane and centrifuging at 8000 rpm for 5 minutes. Discard the supernatant and redisperse the pellet in hexane for storage [10] [42].

Cascade Surface Modification Protocol

This protocol for creating stable, doped CQD inks is detailed in [49].

• Initial Halogenation (n-type ink): Begin with OA-capped CQDs in octane. Treat with a lead halide (e.g., PbI₂) solution to replace native ligands and form a halide-rich surface. Transfer the CQDs into DMF, where they will form a stable n-type colloidal ink.
• Surface Reprogramming (p-type ink): To the halide-passivated CQDs in DMF, add the desired bifunctional thiol ligand (e.g., CTA for -NH₂ termination). The thiol group will displace the halide anions, binding covalently to the CQD surface. The terminal functional group (L) determines the final solubility and doping.
• Solubility Tailoring: For p-type inks, select ligands with terminal groups that form favorable hydrogen bonds with the target solvent (e.g., butylamine, BTA). Cysteamine (CTA), with its -NH₂ terminal group, provides excellent miscibility with BTA-based n-type inks, which is crucial for forming homogeneous bulk homojunction films [49].

Layer-by-Layer (LBL) Solid-State Ligand Exchange

This protocol is used to fabricate high-quality, conductive PQD films for devices [43].

• Substrate Preparation: Clean glass or ITO substrates sequentially in detergent, deionized water, isopropanol, acetone, and ethanol via ultrasonication. Perform UV-ozone treatment for 15 minutes to improve wettability.
• PQD Film Deposition: Spin-coat the native OA/OAm-capped CsPbI3 PQD solution (in hexane or octane) onto the substrate.
• Washing and Ligand Exchange (per layer): While the film is still wet, immediately rinse with methyl acetate (MeOAc) to remove excess solvent and displace long-chain ligands. Subsequently, treat the film with a solution of the short-chain ligand (e.g., PEAI in ethyl acetate). Spin-dry.
• Iteration: Repeat steps 2 and 3 for multiple cycles (typically 5-10 times) to build up a thick, homogenous, and electronically coupled PQD film.

The diagram below illustrates the workflow for the LBL solid-state ligand exchange process.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents and Materials

Successful implementation of the described protocols requires a set of key reagents, each with a specific function in synthesis, ligand exchange, and passivation.

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents for PQD Ligand Engineering

Reagent Category & Name	Chemical Function	Role in Ligand Engineering & Device Fabrication
Synthesis Ligands
Oleic Acid (OA) [43] [42]	Long-chain carboxylic acid	Primary surface ligand during synthesis; ensures colloidal stability and monodispersity.
Oleylamine (OAm) [43] [42]	Long-chain amine	Co-ligand during synthesis; aids in solubility and controls crystal growth.
Short / Functional Ligands
Phenethylammonium Iodide (PEAI) [43]	Short-chain aromatic ammonium salt	LBL exchange ligand; enhances inter-dot coupling via π-π stacking and passivates surface defects.
2-Thiophenemethylammonium Iodide (ThMAI) [42]	Multifunctional organic salt	Anchoring ligand; thiophene binds Pb²⁺, ammonium passivates Cs⁺ vacancies; induces strain for phase stability.
Trioctylphosphine Oxide (TOPO) [10]	Organophosphorus compound	Surface passivation ligand; coordinates with undercoordinated Pb²⁺ ions to suppress non-radiative recombination.
Cysteamine (CTA) [49]	Bifunctional thiol (SH-R-NH₂)	Used in CSM; thiol binds to CQD surface, amine group controls solubility and p-type doping.
Processing Chemicals
Methyl Acetate (MeOAc) [43]	Polar aprotic solvent	Washing solvent in LBL process; removes excess OA/OAm and precipitates PQDs into solid films.
1-Octadecene (ODE) [10] [42]	Non-polar solvent	High-booint reaction medium for hot-injection synthesis of PQDs.
Lead Iodide (PbI₂) [49]	Inorganic halide salt	Halogenation agent in CSM for initial n-type passivation of CQDs.

The strategic management of surface ligands has proven to be the most critical factor in unlocking the full potential of perovskite quantum dots for optoelectronics. The field has moved beyond simple ligand exchange towards sophisticated, multi-step paradigms like cascade surface modification and complementary dual-ligand systems. These approaches successfully decouple the historically conflicting requirements of colloidal stability and electronic coupling. The key insights involve using an initial, strongly-bound passivator to mitigate defects, followed by a secondary ligand that tunes doping and solubility, or by employing ligands with multifaceted functional groups that simultaneously passivate various defect types and induce beneficial strain.

Future research will likely focus on the discovery and rational design of novel multifunctional ligands with tailored electronic properties, such as those capable of directly participating in charge transport. Furthermore, extending these ligand engineering principles to other perovskite compositions and hybrid material systems will be crucial for developing next-generation devices like photocatalysts and quantum light sources. The progress summarized in this whitepaper provides a robust foundation and a clear toolkit for the continued advancement of high-performance, stable PQD-based technologies.

Validation and Comparative Analysis: Assessing Ligand Performance in Functional Systems

The electronic and optical properties of perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) are profoundly influenced by their surface chemistry. Surface ligands, which passivate the dynamic surface of PQDs, are not merely protective shells but are critical components that dictate charge carrier dynamics, environmental stability, and ultimately, device performance. The presence of surface and interfacial trap sites, often arising from uncoordinated lead (Pb²⁺) ions and incomplete surface passivation, is a primary issue accounting for inferior performance in PQD-based devices [50]. Ligands with long organic chains, such as oleic acid (OA) and oleylammonium (OAm+), can form steric-repulsing interactions that prevent full surface coverage, leaving sites susceptible to becoming non-radiative recombination centers [50]. Consequently, rigorous characterization of ligand effects is indispensable for advancing PQD technology. This guide details three pivotal techniques—Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY), Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS), and Mobility Measurements—that together provide a comprehensive picture of how ligand engineering modifies PQD properties, enabling the development of more efficient and stable optoelectronic devices.

Core Characterization Techniques

Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY)

Principle and Significance

Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY) is a direct and quantitative measure of the radiative efficiency of a luminescent material. It is defined as the ratio of the number of photons emitted to the number of photons absorbed. A high PLQY indicates effective suppression of non-radiative recombination pathways, which are often caused by trap states on the QD surface. Therefore, PLQY serves as a primary indicator of the quality of surface passivation achieved by a ligand shell. An increase in PLQY following a ligand exchange process, as observed when OA-capped PbS QDs are treated with formamidinium lead iodide (FAPbI₃), signals successful defect passivation [51].

Experimental Protocol

Absolute PLQY Measurement using an Integrating Sphere: This is the most accurate method for determining absolute PLQY values.

• Sample Preparation: Prepare a thin film of the PQDs on a spectroscopically neutral substrate (e.g., quartz) or a stable, optically clear solution in a cuvette. The optical density should typically be below 0.1 at the excitation wavelength to minimize re-absorption effects.
• Instrument Setup: Place the sample inside the center of an integrating sphere, which is coupled to a spectrophotometer and a photodetector. Ensure the sphere's interior coating is highly reflective (e.g., Spectralon).
• Excitation: Use a laser or monochromated light source at a wavelength strongly absorbed by the PQDs (e.g., 450 nm). The excitation beam should be directed to miss the sample in the first instance for a reference measurement.
• Data Acquisition:
  • Step 1: Measure the emission spectrum with the excitation beam directly entering the sphere (no sample interaction). This gives the incident light spectrum, ( I{ex}(\lambda) ).
  • Step 2: Measure the emission spectrum with the excitation beam hitting the sample. This spectrum contains both the PL emission from the sample and the light from the excitation beam that was scattered or reflected, ( I{sample}(\lambda) ).
  • Step 3: Measure the emission spectrum with the excitation beam positioned to hit the sphere wall instead of the sample. This gives the spectrum of the scattered/reflected excitation light without the PL contribution, ( I_{ref}(\lambda) ).
• Data Analysis: The absolute PLQY (( \Phi )) is calculated by integrating the relevant portions of the spectra [50]: [ \Phi = \frac{\int I{sample}(\lambda)d\lambda - \int I{ref}(\lambda)d\lambda}{\int I{ex}(\lambda)d\lambda} ] where the integrals for ( I{sample} ) and ( I{ref} ) are taken over the PL emission band, and the integral for ( I{ex} ) is taken over the excitation peak.

Table 1: Representative PLQY and TRPL Data for Different Ligand Systems

Ligand Type	PLQY (%)	TRPL Lifetime Components (ns)	Interpretation
Long-chain (Oleic Acid)	15% [51]	τ₁=10.3 (A₁=0.41), τ₂=1777 (A₂=0.20) [51]	Dominant slow decay suggests limited non-radiative recombination.
FAPbI₃	1.5% [51]	τ₁=10.3 (A₁=0.41), τ₂=1777 (A₂=0.20) [51]	Drastic quenching, reduced lifetime indicates new recombination pathways.
FASCN	"the most notable improvement" [50]	"prolonged lifetime" [50]	Effective passivation, leading to higher radiative efficiency and slower recombination.

Data Interpretation

Time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL) is a complementary technique that provides insights into the recombination dynamics. A bi-exponential decay model is often used to fit the data, revealing fast (( \tau1 )) and slow (( \tau2 )) components, which are typically associated with trap-assisted non-radiative recombination and radiative recombination, respectively [51]. An effective ligand treatment like FASCN not only increases the PLQY but also prolongs the PL lifetime, indicating a reduction in trap-state density and a more favorable balance between radiative and non-radiative processes [50].

Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS)

Principle and Significance

Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) is a powerful technique for characterizing electrical properties of materials and interfaces, such as charge transport resistance, capacitance, and trap states. In the context of PQD films, EIS is used to probe how surface ligands influence the energy barriers for charge carrier transport and the density of interfacial trap states. Ligands that desorb or form incompact bonds can create interfacial quenching centers that impede charge transport and act as recombination hubs [50]. EIS helps quantify these effects.

Experimental Protocol

EIS Measurement on a PQD Thin Film Device:

• Device Fabrication: Fabricate a simple two-terminal device by depositing a uniform PQD film via spin-coating or inkjet printing onto a substrate with pre-patterned electrodes (e.g., gold or ITO). The active area should be well-defined.
• Instrument Setup: Connect the device to a potentiostat equipped with an impedance analyzer. The measurement is typically performed in a dark box to prevent photo-induced effects.
• Measurement Parameters:
  • Apply a small AC modulation voltage (e.g., 10-50 mV) superimposed on a DC bias voltage (often 0 V, but can be varied).
  • Sweep the frequency across a wide range, typically from 1 MHz down to 1 Hz or lower.
  • Perform the measurement at different temperatures or under different lighting conditions if required.
• Data Acquisition: The potentiostat measures the complex impedance, ( Z(\omega) = Z' + jZ'' ), at each frequency. This data is commonly presented as a Nyquist plot (( -Z'' ) vs. ( Z' )).

Data Analysis and Fitting: The impedance data is analyzed by fitting it to an equivalent circuit model that represents the physical processes within the device. A common model for a QD film is a modified Randles circuit, which includes:

• ( R_s ): Series resistance (contacts, wires).
• ( R_{ct} ): Charge transfer resistance across the film or interfaces.
• ( CPE ): Constant Phase Element, which often replaces an ideal capacitor to account for the non-ideal, distributed capacitive behavior of a rough or inhomogeneous film.
• ( W ): Warburg element, which models ion diffusion (may be relevant for certain perovskite compositions).

The quality of the ligand passivation is reflected in the ( R{ct} ) value; a lower ( R{ct} ) indicates more efficient charge transport. The capacitance extracted from the CPE can provide information on trap states and ionic mobility.

Mobility Measurements

Principle and Significance

Charge carrier mobility (( \mu )) quantifies how quickly an electron or hole can move through a material under an applied electric field. In PQD films, mobility is highly dependent on the inter-dot distance and the electronic coupling between neighboring dots, both of which are governed by the surface ligands. Long, insulating ligands act as barriers to charge transport, whereas short, conductive ligands facilitate wavefunction overlap and efficient carrier tunneling. Measuring mobility is therefore crucial for evaluating the suitability of a ligand system for electronic devices like LEDs and transistors. For instance, FASCN treatment, with its short carbon chain, enabled an eightfold higher conductivity in PQD films compared to the control [50].

Experimental Protocols

A) Two-Terminal Space-Charge-Limited Current (SCLC) Measurement:

This method is widely used for estimating the mobility of thin films.

• Device Fabrication: Create a hole-only or electron-only device. A common hole-only structure is ITO/PEDOT:PSS/PQD Film/MoO₃/Ag. For electron-only, use ITO/ZnO/PQD Film/ZnO/Ag. The film thickness must be known accurately.
• Current-Voltage (I-V) Measurement: Sweep the voltage and measure the resulting current in the dark. The I-V curve will show different regions.
• Data Analysis:
  • Ohmic Region: At low voltages, current (( I )) is proportional to voltage (( V )).
  • Child's Law Region: At higher voltages, the current is dominated by the space-charge and follows ( I \propto V^2 ). The electron mobility (( \mu )) can be extracted from this region using the Mott-Gurney law: [ J = \frac{9}{8} \epsilonr \epsilon0 \mu \frac{V^2}{L^3} ] where ( J ) is the current density, ( \epsilonr ) is the relative dielectric constant of the material, ( \epsilon0 ) is the vacuum permittivity, ( \mu ) is the mobility, ( V ) is the applied voltage, and ( L ) is the film thickness.

B) Field-Effect Transistor (FET) Measurement:

This technique directly probes the field-effect mobility in a transistor configuration.

• Device Fabrication: Fabricate a bottom-gate top-contact FET. This involves a heavily doped silicon wafer with a thermal oxide layer as the gate/gate dielectric, onto which the PQD film is deposited. Source and drain electrodes (e.g., gold) are then evaporated on top.
• Electrical Characterization: Measure the output (( I{DS} ) vs. ( V{DS} )) and transfer (( I{DS} ) vs. ( V{GS} )) characteristics of the transistor in a vacuum probe station.
• Data Analysis: In the linear regime of operation, the field-effect mobility (( \mu{FE} )) is calculated from the transconductance (( gm )) using: [ \mu{FE} = \frac{L}{W} \cdot \frac{1}{Ci V{DS}} \cdot gm ] where ( W ) and ( L ) are the channel width and length, respectively, and ( C_i ) is the capacitance per unit area of the gate dielectric.

Table 2: Summary of Key Characterization Techniques for Ligand Effects

Technique	Primary Measured Parameters	Key Ligand-Dependent Properties Probed	Typical Sample Format
PLQY	Quantum Yield, TRPL Lifetimes	Surface trap density, Non-radiative recombination, Passivation quality	Solution, Thin Film
EIS	Charge Transfer Resistance (Rₜc), Capacitance	Interfacial trap states, Ion migration, Charge transport barriers	Two-terminal device
Mobility (SCLC)	Charge Carrier Mobility (μ)	Inter-dot electronic coupling, Film conductivity, Tunneling efficiency	Hole-only/Electron-only device
Mobility (FET)	Field-Effect Mobility (μ_FE)	Charge transport in a channel, Defect density at semiconductor-dielectric interface	Field-effect transistor

Integrated Workflow and Data Correlation

A robust analysis of ligand effects requires the correlation of data from all three techniques. The following workflow diagram outlines the sequential experimental steps and the logical relationships between the characterized properties and the final device performance.

Ligand Characterization Workflow

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Ligand Exchange Studies

Reagent / Material	Function / Role	Example in Context
Oleic Acid (OA) / Oleylamine (OAm)	Long-chain native ligands used in synthesis for colloidal stability.	Standard capping ligands for as-synthesized PbS and FAPbI₃ QDs [51] [50].
Formamidine Thiocyanate (FASCN)	Short, bidentate liquid ligand for high-coverage passivation.	Provides tight binding, high surface coverage, and improved conductivity in FAPbI₃ QDs [50].
Formamidinium Lead Iodide (FAPbI₃)	Organic-inorganic perovskite ligand for surface passivation.	Used to passivate PbS QDs, broadening absorption and changing recombination dynamics [51].
Methylammonium Lead Iodide (MAPbI₃)	Organic-inorganic perovskite ligand for surface passivation.	A common capping material for PbS QD inks, though less stable than FAPbI₃ [51].
Spectroscopic Solvents (Hexane, NMF)	Solvents for phase transfer during ligand exchange.	Used in binary-phase ligand exchange protocols (e.g., PbS QDs with FAPbI₃) [51].
Integrating Sphere	Optical component for absolute PLQY measurement.	Essential for accurately determining the quantum efficiency of PL emission from PQD solutions or films [50].
Two-Terminal Device	Simple electrical structure for SCLC and EIS.	Used to measure film conductivity and charge transport properties [50].

The synergistic application of PLQY, EIS, and mobility measurements provides an unambiguous picture of how ligand engineering alters the fundamental properties of PQDs. PLQY reveals the efficacy of surface passivation and the reduction of non-radiative traps. EIS uncovers the electrical impedance and interfacial dynamics introduced by the ligand shell. Finally, mobility measurements directly quantify the enhancement in charge transport facilitated by short, conductive ligands. Together, this triad of characterization techniques forms the bedrock of rational ligand design, guiding researchers toward the development of high-performance PQD materials for the next generation of optoelectronic devices. The correlation of data from these methods, as illustrated in this guide, is critical for establishing robust structure-property relationships that connect molecular-level ligand characteristics to macroscopic device performance.

Surface ligand engineering represents a critical frontier in the rational design of perovskite quantum dots (PQDs), directly influencing their electronic properties, optical performance, and environmental stability. This technical analysis examines three predominant ligand classes—linear, branched, and aromatic—within the broader research context of manipulating PQD electronic characteristics for advanced optoelectronic applications. The fundamental role of surface ligands extends beyond simple colloidal stabilization to active participation in electronic passivation, charge transport modulation, and defect termination [32]. Understanding the structure-function relationship between ligand architecture and PQD performance parameters is essential for developing next-generation quantum dot materials with tailored properties for specific technological implementations, from photovoltaics to light-emitting devices [10] [52].

Fundamental Roles of Surface Ligands in PQD Systems

Surface ligands serve as multifunctional molecular interfaces between the perovskite nanocrystal core and its external environment. For PQDs with their characteristically high surface-to-volume ratio, surface atoms with unterminated bonds (dangling bonds) create trap states that facilitate non-radiative recombination of charge carriers, ultimately diminishing photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) and device efficiency [32]. Effective ligand systems must address several critical functions simultaneously:

• Surface Passivation: Ligands coordinate with undercoordinated surface ions (particularly Pb²⁺) to suppress trap states and reduce non-radiative recombination pathways [10].
• Environmental Protection: A robust ligand shell creates a kinetic barrier against degradation from environmental factors such as moisture, oxygen, and prolonged illumination [10] [32].
• Colloidal Stability: Ligands prevent PQD aggregation through steric and/or electrostatic repulsion, maintaining discrete nanocrystals in suspension [32].
• Electronic Structure Modulation: Ligands influence the energy level alignment at PQD surfaces, affecting charge injection/extraction processes in devices [30] [32].
• Interparticle Spacing Control: Ligand architecture determines the nearest-neighbor distance in quantum dot solids, directly impacting charge transport through hopping or tunneling mechanisms [30].

The effectiveness with which ligands execute these functions is fundamentally governed by their molecular structure, including chain length, functional group chemistry, and topological configuration (linear, branched, or aromatic).

Ligand Architectures: Mechanisms and Properties

Linear Alkyl Ligands

Linear alkyl ligands, typically featuring long hydrocarbon chains (e.g., oleic acid/OA, oleylamine/OLA), represent the conventional approach to PQD stabilization through a binary passivation mechanism.

• Passivation Mechanism: The carboxylate (-COO⁻) group of OA coordinates with cationic surface sites (Pb²⁺), while the ammonium (-NH₃⁺) group of OLA passivates anionic sites (I⁻) [32]. This complementary binding creates a relatively stable ligand shell that reduces surface defects.
• Structural Properties: The flexible alkyl chains enable dense packing on PQD surfaces, maximizing interligand van der Waals interactions that contribute to shell stability [53].
• Electronic Influence: While effective for passivation, long alkyl chains introduce significant insulating barriers between PQDs, potentially hindering charge transport in solid films [32].
• Limitations: Linear ligands remain susceptible to desorption during processing or operation due to dynamic binding equilibria, potentially exposing surface defects over time [10].

Branched Chain Ligands

Branched ligands introduce structural complexity through alkyl chain branching, creating steric hindrance that fundamentally alters the thermodynamics and packing behavior of the ligand shell.

• Passivation Mechanism: Similar to linear ligands, branched ligands employ the same functional groups (-COOH, -NH₂) for surface coordination but with modified packing behavior due to steric constraints [53].
• Structural Properties: Branching disrupts interdigitation between adjacent ligands and adjacent PQDs, enhancing colloidal stability by increasing the conformational entropy of the bound ligand layer [53]. This "entropic stabilization" makes dissociation thermodynamically unfavorable.
• Electronic Influence: Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) studies reveal that ligand exchange with branched alkylthiols exhibits lower exothermicity (ΔH = -13.0 kJ/mol for 2-MHT vs. -22.4 kJ/mol for linear heptanethiol) and reduced entropy loss (ΔS = -14.9 J/mol·K vs. -37.6 J/mol·K), indicating less ordered packing with potentially beneficial effects for charge transport [53].
• Stability Performance: Branched ligands like (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES) can form protective silica layers through hydrolysis, significantly enhancing PQD stability in protic environments [32].

Aromatic Ligands

Aromatic ligands incorporate conjugated π-systems that introduce unique electronic and structural characteristics to the PQD surface.

• Passivation Mechanism: Aromatic ligands such as benzylamine (BZA) and benzoic acid (BA) utilize the same primary functional groups as their aliphatic counterparts but with altered binding affinity due to electronic conjugation effects [32].
• Structural Properties: The planar aromatic rings enable π-π stacking interactions between adjacent ligands, creating a more rigid and potentially more ordered ligand shell structure compared to aliphatic systems [32].
• Electronic Influence: The conjugated π-system can enhance electronic coupling between PQDs, facilitating improved charge transport in solid films [32]. Trans-cinnamic acid derivatives function as exciton delocalization ligands (EDLs), reducing the energy gap relative to the PQD core and modifying exciton dynamics [32].
• Stability Considerations: The rigid aromatic structure may create a more effective barrier against molecular species like H₂O and O₂, though systematic comparative studies on environmental stability are limited.

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Ligand Architectures in PQD Systems

Property	Linear Alkyl Ligands	Branched Chain Ligands	Aromatic Ligands
Representative Examples	Oleic acid (OA), Oleylamine (OLA)	2-methyl-1-hexanethiol (2-MHT), APTES	Benzylamine (BZA), Benzoic acid (BA)
Binding Affinity	Moderate, dynamic equilibrium	Moderate, enhanced by entropy	Potentially stronger due to π-interactions
Interparticle Spacing	Larger, distance-dependent on chain length	Intermediate, reduced interdigitation	Potentially smaller with π-stacking
Charge Transport	Limited by insulating chains	Potentially improved	Enhanced by conjugation
Environmental Stability	Moderate	High, especially with silanes	Moderate to high
Conformational Entropy	Lower	Higher ("entropic ligands")	Intermediate

Quantitative Performance Comparison

Recent systematic studies have enabled direct comparison of ligand performance across critical PQD metrics, particularly for CsPbI₃ systems with their technological relevance and inherent stability challenges.

Table 2: Experimental Performance Metrics by Ligand Chemistry in CsPbI₃ PQDs

Ligand Type	Specific Ligand	PL Enhancement (%)	Photostability (PL Retention after UV exposure)	Key Findings
Linear Alkyl	Standard OA/OLA	Baseline	Not specified in study	Reference system with moderate performance
Branched	Trioctylphosphine (TOP)	+16%	Intermediate stability	Effective defect passivation
Branched	Trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO)	+18%	Intermediate stability	Superior passivation of Pb²⁺ sites
Aromatic	L-phenylalanine (L-PHE)	+3%	>70% after 20 days	Exceptional photostability
Branched Silane	APTES	Not quantified	High stability in protic solvents	Forms protective silica layer

The data reveals a notable performance trade-off between maximum luminescence enhancement and long-term photostability. While TOPO provides the greatest PL enhancement (18%), suggesting highly effective surface passivation, L-PHE-modified PQDs demonstrate superior stability under prolonged UV stress, retaining over 70% of initial emission after 20 days of continuous exposure [10]. This stability-performance dichotomy highlights the importance of ligand selection based on application-specific requirements.

For branched ligands, thermodynamic studies using isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) provide quantitative insights into their unique behavior. Compared to linear ligands, branched systems exhibit significantly different thermodynamic parameters during ligand exchange reactions: lower exothermicity (ΔH = -13.0 kJ/mol for 2-MHT vs. -22.4 kJ/mol for linear heptanethiol) and reduced entropy loss (ΔS = -14.9 J/mol·K vs. -37.6 J/mol·K) [53]. This thermodynamic profile supports the classification of branched ligands as "entropic stabilizers" that maintain colloidal stability through conformational entropy rather than strong interligand interactions.

Experimental Protocols for Ligand Evaluation

Synthesis of Ligand-Modified CsPbI₃ PQDs

Hot-Injection Method for CsPbI₃ PQDs [10] [32]

• Precursor Preparation:

  • Dissolve 0.16 mmol cesium carbonate (Cs₂CO₃) in 10 mL 1-octadecene (ODE) with 0.5 mL OA at 120°C under vacuum for 1 hour.
  • Prepare lead precursor by dissolving 0.2 mmol PbI₂ in ODE with specific ligands (OA, OLA, TOP, TOPO, or L-PHE) at 100°C under vacuum.

• Reaction Process:

  • Heat the lead precursor solution to optimal reaction temperature (170°C for CsPbI₃) under N₂ atmosphere.
  • Rapidly inject the Cs-oleate precursor solution into the reaction vessel with vigorous stirring.
  • Maintain reaction for 5-15 seconds before ice-water bath quenching.

• Purification:

  • Centrifuge the crude solution at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes.
  • Discard supernatant and redisperse precipitate in anhydrous hexane or toluene.
  • Repeat centrifugation and redispersion cycle twice to remove unreacted precursors and excess ligands.

• Storage:

  • Store purified PQDs in anhydrous, oxygen-free solvent at 4°C in dark conditions.

Critical Parameters:

• Temperature control: Optimal CsPbI₃ PQDs form at 170°C; higher temperatures (≥180°C) induce phase transitions and PL quenching [10].
• Ligand concentration: Systematic variation (0.1-0.4 mmol) required to optimize passivation without inducing aggregation.
• Injection volume: 1.5 mL demonstrated optimal PL intensity with narrow full width at half maximum (FWHM) [10].

Ligand Exchange Procedures

Post-Synthetic Ligand Exchange [53]

• Native Ligand Removal:

  • Precipitate PQDs using anti-solvent (ethyl acetate/methanol mixture).
  • Centrifuge and collect pellet with native ligands partially removed.

• Ligand Solution Preparation:

  • Dissolve branched alkylthiol ligands (e.g., 2-MHT) in degassed toluene at 10 mM concentration.

• Exchange Reaction:

  • Redisperse PQD pellet in ligand solution with vigorous stirring.
  • React for 2-12 hours under N₂ atmosphere at room temperature.
  • Monitor completion via NMR or ITC titration.

• Purification:

  • Precipitate with methanol/acetone mixture.
  • Centrifuge and redisperse in desired solvent.

ITC Characterization Protocol [53]:

• Fill sample cell with PQD solution (1-5 μM in Cd²⁺ surface sites).
• Load ligand solution (150-300 μM) into injection syringe.
• Set reference power to 5-10 μCal/sec, temperature at 25°C.
• Program 25-50 injections (2-4 μL each) with 180-240 second intervals.
• Fit integrated heat data to independent single-site or two-site exchange models to extract ΔH, ΔS, and ΔG.

Optical Characterization Methods

Photoluminescence Quantum Yield (PLQY) Measurement:

• Use integrating sphere with calibrated spectrophotometer.
• Measure emission from directly excited and indirectly excited areas.
• Calculate PLQY = Iₑₘᵢₜₜₑd / (Iₐᵦₛₒᵣbₑd - Iᵣₑₓcᵢₜₑd) where I represents integrated intensity.

Photostability Testing:

• Expose PQD films to continuous UV irradiation (λ = 365 nm, I = 10 mW/cm²).
• Monitor PL intensity at regular intervals over 20-day period.
• Normalize data to initial PL intensity and plot retention percentage versus time [10].

Ligand Binding Mechanics and Experimental Workflow

The relationship between ligand structure and PQD surface interaction can be visualized through the following mechanistic diagram:

Diagram 1: Ligand Structure-Property Relationships. This diagram illustrates how different ligand architectures influence PQD properties through distinct mechanistic pathways.

The experimental workflow for systematic ligand evaluation involves multiple characterization techniques:

Diagram 2: Experimental Workflow for Ligand Evaluation. This diagram outlines the systematic approach for correlating ligand structure with PQD properties.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Reagents for Ligand Studies in PQD Research

Reagent Category	Specific Examples	Function/Purpose
Precursor Materials	Cesium carbonate (Cs₂CO₃), Lead iodide (PbI₂)	Inorganic framework components for perovskite crystal structure
Linear Ligands	Oleic acid (OA), Oleylamine (OLA)	Conventional passivation via carboxylate-ammonium pairing
Branched Ligands	Trioctylphosphine (TOP), Trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO), 2-methyl-1-hexanethiol (2-MHT)	Enhanced passivation with steric hindrance and entropic stabilization
Aromatic Ligands	L-phenylalanine (L-PHE), Benzylamine (BZA), Benzoic acid (BA)	Improved charge transport and photostability through π-conjugation
Solvents	1-Octadecene (ODE), Toluene, Hexane	High-boiling nonpolar solvents for synthesis and dispersion
Characterization Tools	Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC), NMR, Photoluminescence Spectroscopy	Quantitative analysis of binding thermodynamics and optical properties

The comparative analysis of linear, branched, and aromatic ligand architectures reveals distinct structure-function relationships that critically determine PQD electronic properties and application potential. Linear alkyl ligands provide conventional passivation but introduce charge transport limitations through their insulating character. Branched ligands offer entropic stabilization and reduced packing density, with thermodynamic studies confirming their unique exchange behavior. Aromatic ligands enable enhanced electronic coupling through π-conjugation while providing exceptional photostability in specific configurations.

The optimal ligand selection depends fundamentally on the target application: maximum luminescence efficiency favors phosphine oxide-based branched ligands, while long-term operational stability benefits from aromatic amino acids. Future research directions should explore hybrid ligand systems that combine advantageous properties from multiple classes, multidentate architectures for enhanced binding affinity, and stimuli-responsive ligands for dynamic property control. As ligand engineering continues to evolve, its critical role in bridging synthetic control with electronic performance will undoubtedly expand, enabling increasingly sophisticated PQD materials for next-generation optoelectronic technologies.

The precise detection of the neurotransmitter dopamine (DA) is critical for diagnosing and managing neurological disorders. Conventional detection methods often struggle with the dual challenges of achieving ultra-sensitive detection limits and maintaining specificity in complex biological matrices. This case study explores a groundbreaking sensor technology that addresses these challenges through innovative material science. The core of this advancement lies in a novel dual-mode sensing platform utilizing CsPbBr3 perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) integrated into a covalent organic framework (COF) [54] [38]. This platform is a prime example of how engineering at the nanoscale—particularly the strategic manipulation of surface ligands and composite interfaces—can profoundly enhance electronic and optical properties, leading to revolutionary performance in biosensing [10]. The sensor achieves unparalleled sensitivity by leveraging the synergistic effects of fluorescence quenching and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) [54].

The Role of Surface Chemistry and Composite Design

The exceptional performance of the CsPbBr3-PQD-COF nanocomposite is rooted in the deliberate engineering of its components and their interfaces. Each material was selected and synthesized to contribute specific electronic and structural properties, with surface ligands playing a pivotal role in stabilizing the quantum dots and facilitating integration.

CsPbBr3 Perovskite Quantum Dots (PQDs)

CsPbBr3 PQDs serve as the primary optoelectronic transducers in the sensor. Their excellent properties include high photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY), narrow emission spectra, and strong light absorption [38]. However, pristine PQDs are inherently unstable and susceptible to degradation from moisture, oxygen, and light [10]. Furthermore, their native long-chain insulating ligands, such as oleate (OA⁻) and oleylammonium (OAm⁺), hinder efficient charge transfer between QDs, which is detrimental to both optical and electrochemical sensing [1].

Surface ligand engineering is therefore critical. During synthesis, ligands like oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OAm) act as capping agents, coordinating with undercoordinated Pb²⁺ ions on the surface to suppress non-radiative recombination and control crystal growth [10] [38]. As explored in broader PQD research, replacing these native insulating ligands with shorter, more conductive counterparts is a universal strategy for enhancing inter-dot electronic coupling and improving charge carrier mobility [2] [1]. This principle is fundamental to optimizing PQDs for any electronic or sensing application.

Covalent Organic Framework (COF) Scaffold

The COF used in this sensor is synthesized via Schiff-base condensation between 1,3,5-tris(4-aminophenyl)benzene (TAPB) and 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalaldehyde (DHTA) [38]. This reaction creates a highly ordered, porous, and π-conjugated crystalline structure. The COF scaffold serves multiple essential functions:

• Stabilization: It protects the embedded PQDs from the aqueous environment, mitigating aggregation and degradation [38].
• Analyte Enrichment: Its high surface area and porous structure facilitate the concentration of dopamine molecules near the PQDs.
• Selective Recognition: The π-conjugated system of the COF backbone enables selective dopamine recognition via π-π stacking interactions with dopamine's aromatic ring [54] [38].

Synergistic Integration: The CsPbBr3-PQD-COF Nanocomposite

The true innovation lies in integrating the PQDs within the COF matrix. This integration is not merely physical mixing; it creates a synergistic interface. The COF's structure provides an ideal platform for the PQDs to anchor, likely through interactions between the organic ligands on the PQDs and the organic linkers of the COF. This hybrid structure leverages the optoelectronic strengths of the PQDs and the molecular sieving and pre-concentration capabilities of the COF. The resulting material provides multiple pathways for dopamine detection: it modulates the fluorescence of the PQDs and alters the interfacial charge transfer resistance measurable by EIS [54] [38].

Sensing Mechanism and Performance Metrics

The CsPbBr3-PQD-COF platform operates via a dual-mode detection mechanism, which significantly enhances its reliability and dynamic range.

Dual-Mode Detection Mechanism

• Fluorescence Sensing: The mechanism is based on fluorescence quenching ("turn-off"). Upon the introduction of dopamine, several interactions occur simultaneously:

  • Photoinduced Electron Transfer (PET): Dopamine molecules, adsorbed onto the nanocomposite surface, act as electron donors. They transfer electrons to the conduction band of the CsPbBr3 PQDs, effectively quenching their photoluminescence [38].
  • Energy Transfer and π-π Stacking: The dopamine molecules, which are also fluorescent, may engage in fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) with the PQDs. Furthermore, their incorporation into the COF scaffold via π-π stacking brings them into close proximity with the PQDs, maximizing these interaction efficiencies [38]. The combination of PET and energy transfer leads to a concentration-dependent decrease in the green fluorescence of the PQDs.

• Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS): Dopamine adsorption on the electrode surface modified with the CsPbBr3-PQD-COF nanocomposite alters the interface's electronic properties. The oxidation of dopamine generates electrons, which increases the electron transfer rate at the electrode interface. This manifests as a measurable decrease in charge transfer resistance (Rₜ), which is proportional to the dopamine concentration [54] [38].

• Visual Indicator: Rhodamine B was incorporated into the sensing matrix as a visual indicator. At dopamine concentrations exceeding 100 pM, a distinct color shift from green to pink is observable under ambient light, providing a simple, qualitative readout [54] [38].

The experimental workflow below summarizes the synthesis and sensing process.

Quantitative Performance Data

The sensor's performance was rigorously quantified, demonstrating exceptional figures of merit as summarized in the table below.

Table 1: Performance Metrics of the CsPbBr3-PQD-COF Dopamine Sensor

Parameter	Fluorescence Mode	EIS Mode
Limit of Detection (LOD)	0.3 fM [54] [38]	2.5 fM [54] [38]
Linear Dynamic Range	1 fM to 500 μM [54] [38]	1 fM to 500 μM [54] [38]
Selectivity (Cross-reactivity)	<6% against common interferents (e.g., ascorbic acid, uric acid) [54] [38]	<6% against common interferents [54] [38]
Real-Sample Recovery (Human Serum)	97.5% - 103.8% [54] [38]	97.5% - 103.8% [54] [38]
Stability	Retained performance over 30 days [54] [38]	Retained performance over 30 days [54] [38]
Visual Readout	Green-to-pink shift above 100 pM (with Rhodamine B) [54] [38]	N/A

Detailed Experimental Protocols

To ensure reproducibility, the key synthesis and fabrication procedures are outlined below.

Synthesis of CsPbBr3 PQDs

Method: Hot-injection [38]

• Procedure:
  • Precursor Preparation: Co-dissolve 0.147 g of PbBr₂ (0.4 mmol) and 0.085 g of CsBr (0.4 mmol) in 10 mL of anhydrous N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF) in a three-neck flask.
  • Ligand Addition: Add 1 mL of oleic acid (OA) and 0.5 mL of oleylamine (OAm) as capping ligands to the solution.
  • Degassing: Purge the mixture with nitrogen gas for 15 minutes to remove oxygen and water vapor.
  • Reaction: Heat the mixture to 120°C under a continuous nitrogen flow.
  • Nucleation: Rapidly inject 0.5 mL of preheated toluene (60°C) to trigger instantaneous nucleation of CsPbBr₃ PQDs.
  • Quenching & Purification: Allow the reaction to proceed for 10 seconds before immediately cooling in an ice-water bath. Purify the resulting green-emitting colloid by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 5 minutes, wash twice with anhydrous toluene, and redisperse in 5 mL of anhydrous DMF.
• Key Quality Control: The resulting PQDs should exhibit a sharp photoluminescence emission peak at ~515 nm and a PLQY of approximately 85% [38].

Synthesis of COF and PQD-COF Integration

Method: Solvothermal synthesis followed by blending [38]

• COF Synthesis:
  • Dissolve 0.035 g of TAPB (0.1 mmol) and 0.025 g of DHTA (0.15 mmol) in 5 mL of anhydrous DMF.
  • Add 100 μL of glacial acetic acid as a catalyst.
  • Stir the reaction mixture at ambient temperature for 2 hours, forming a bright yellow suspension indicating successful COF formation.
• PQD-COF Integration:
  • The purified CsPbBr₃ PQD dispersion is mixed with the synthesized COF suspension.
  • The mixture is stirred to allow for the integration of PQDs into the porous COF matrix. The π-conjugated system of the COF and the surface ligands of the PQDs facilitate this incorporation.

Sensor Fabrication and Dopamine Assay

• Sensor Fabrication: The CsPbBr3-PQD-COF nanocomposite is deposited onto a clean electrode surface (e.g., glassy carbon electrode) and allowed to dry, forming a stable sensing film [38].
• Dopamine Detection Protocol:
  • Exposure: Incubate the sensor in a sample solution (e.g., diluted human serum) containing the target dopamine for a defined period.
  • Fluorescence Measurement: Place the sensor in a spectrofluorometer. Measure the fluorescence intensity at 515 nm under excitation at 365 nm. The quenching efficiency (I₀/I) is calculated relative to a dopamine-free baseline.
  • EIS Measurement: Using an electrochemical workstation, perform EIS on the modified electrode in a standard redox probe solution like [Fe(CN)₆]³⁻/⁴⁻. The semicircle diameter of the Nyquist plot corresponds to the charge transfer resistance (Rₜ).
  • Data Analysis: Plot the fluorescence quenching efficiency or the change in Rₜ against the logarithm of dopamine concentration to generate a calibration curve.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

The following table lists the key materials and reagents required to replicate this biosensing platform.

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Reagent/Material	Function in the Experiment	Specifications / Notes
Cesium Bromide (CsBr)	Cesium precursor for PQD synthesis	99.9%, anhydrous [38]
Lead(II) Bromide (PbBr₂)	Lead precursor for PQD synthesis	99.999%, trace metals basis [38]
Oleic Acid (OA)	Surface ligand (anionic capping agent) for PQDs	Technical grade, 90% [38]
Oleylamine (OAm)	Surface ligand (cationic capping agent) for PQDs	80-90% [38]
TAPB	COF precursor (amine monomer)	1,3,5-tris(4-aminophenyl)benzene, 97% purity [38]
DHTA	COF precursor (aldehyde monomer)	2,5-dihydroxyterephthalaldehyde, 95% purity [38]
Rhodamine B	Visual indicator for colorimetric readout	Enables green-to-pink color shift at >100 pM DA [38]
Dopamine Hydrochloride	Target analyte	98% purity [38]
N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF)	Solvent for synthesis	Anhydrous, 99.8% [38]

This case study demonstrates that the strategic design of the CsPbBr3-PQD-COF nanocomposite creates a biosensing platform with exceptional performance, achieving femtosecond-level sensitivity, a wide dynamic range, and high specificity for dopamine. The success of this sensor underscores a fundamental principle in nanotechnology: the electronic and optical properties of materials are profoundly influenced by their surface chemistry. The careful selection and engineering of surface ligands on the PQDs, combined with their integration into a supportive COF matrix, were instrumental in stabilizing the nanocrystals, facilitating efficient charge transfer, and enabling selective analyte recognition. This approach provides a versatile and powerful framework that can be adapted for the ultrasensitive detection of a wide range of other biologically and clinically relevant analytes.

The quest for enhanced performance in energy harvesting and medical diagnostics converges on a critical, shared frontier: the precise quantification and benchmarking of efficiency and sensitivity. In photovoltaics (PV), this translates to the conversion efficiency of sunlight into electrical energy. For biosensors, it is the sensitivity and reliability in detecting biological analytes. Advances in both fields are increasingly underpinned by innovations at the nanoscale, where surface engineering plays a pivotal role. This guide details the core metrics, experimental methodologies, and material considerations for benchmarking performance in these two domains, with a specific focus on the profound influence of surface ligands on the electronic properties of lead sulfide quantum dots (PbS QDs)—a material system of significant interest for both next-generation PVs and biosensors [41] [24].

Benchmarking Photovoltaic Efficiency

Core Performance Metrics

The primary metric for evaluating research-grade solar cells is the confirmed power conversion efficiency (PCE) under standardized reporting conditions. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) maintains the global benchmark for these efficiencies across a wide range of photovoltaic technologies [55].

Standard Test Conditions (STC) for PV cell measurement are defined by a reference temperature of 25°C, an incident irradiance of 1000 W/m², and a standard reference spectrum (AM 1.5G) [55]. Independent validation by recognized test labs such as NREL, AIST, JRC-ESTI, and Fraunhofer-ISE is required for entry onto NREL's "Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart" [55].

Table 1: Best Confirmed Efficiencies for Research Photovoltaic Cells (Selected Technologies)

PV Technology	Record Efficiency (%)	Organization	Key Characteristics
Single-Junction GaAs	~29.1	Alta Devices	High efficiency, high cost
Crystalline Si (Lab)	~27.6	Kaneka	Dominant commercial technology
Perovskite	~26.1	UNIST	Rapidly emerging technology
Quantum Dot (QD)	~16.6	UNIST	Size-tunable bandgap

It is critical to note that module-level efficiency is lower than research-cell efficiency due to larger area losses, interconnection losses, and other scaling factors. Performance is also highly sensitive to environmental conditions; for instance, a study found that a 25% increase in temperature during the monsoon season can lower PV power output by 81-87% [56].

Experimental Protocol for PV Performance Validation

The following workflow outlines the standard procedure for certifying a new record PV cell efficiency.

Diagram 1: PV cell certification workflow.

1. Cell Fabrication & Preliminary Characterization:

• Synthesize and fabricate the PV device, ensuring a clean, well-defined active area [55].
• For QD-based solar cells, this involves synthesizing PbS QDs with specific size and surface ligand chemistry, followed by layer-by-layer deposition to form the solid film [41] [24].

2. Standardized Measurement & I-V Characterization:

• Place the cell in a solar simulator calibrated to match the AM 1.5G spectrum.
• Maintain the cell at a constant temperature of 25°C.
• Perform current-voltage (I-V) sweep measurement from short-circuit to open-circuit conditions [55].

3. Efficiency Calculation:

• Calculate PCE (η) using the formula: η (%) = (Pmax / Pin) × 100 = (Jsc × Voc × FF / Pin) × 100, where:
  • Pmax is the maximum power point.
  • Pin is the incident light power density (1000 W/m²).
  • Jsc is the short-circuit current density.
  • Voc is the open-circuit voltage.
  • FF is the fill factor, defined as Pmax / (Jsc × Voc) [55].

4. Independent Certification & Submission:

• Send the cell to an independent, recognized test lab (e.g., NREL) for validation of the efficiency result.
• Upon confirmation, the result can be submitted to NREL for inclusion in the Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart [55].

Benchmarking Biosensor Sensitivity

Core Sensitivity Metrics

Sensitivity in biosensors quantifies the device's ability to reliably detect low concentrations of a target analyte. The key metrics form an interconnected framework for performance benchmarking [57].

Table 2: Key Metrics for Biosensor Sensitivity Benchmarking

Metric	Formula/Definition	Interpretation & Benchmark Value
Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR)	SNR = Signal / Noise	A ratio ≥ 3 is the minimum threshold for reliable detection. Higher SNR indicates greater precision [57].
Response Slope (Sensitivity)	Sensitivity = ΔSignal / ΔConcentration	The steepness of the calibration curve. A steeper slope indicates a more responsive sensor [57].
Limit of Detection (LOD)	LOD = 3 × σ / Sensitivity	The lowest analyte concentration that can be reliably distinguished from noise. σ is the standard deviation of the blank signal [57].
Electroactive Surface Area (ESA)	Estimated via Cyclic Voltammetry (CV)	A larger ESA allows for higher bioreceptor loading, amplifying signal and improving SNR and LOD [57].

Experimental Protocol for Electrochemical Biosensor Characterization

The following protocol outlines the steps to benchmark the sensitivity of an electrochemical biosensor, a common transducer type.

Diagram 2: Biosensor sensitivity benchmarking.

1. Electrode Preparation & Functionalization:

• Clean and characterize the bare transducer electrode (e.g., gold, carbon, or graphene-based).
• Functionalize the electrode surface with biorecognition elements (e.g., antibodies, enzymes, aptamers) specific to the target analyte [58] [57].

2. Calibration Curve Measurement:

• Prepare standard solutions with known analyte concentrations across the expected dynamic range.
• For each concentration, measure the electrochemical signal (e.g., current in amperometry, charge transfer resistance in EIS).
• Plot the measured signal against the analyte concentration to generate the calibration curve [57].

3. Signal, Noise, and Metric Calculation:

• Response Slope (Sensitivity): Determine the slope of the linear portion of the calibration curve.
• Noise: Measure the standard deviation (σ) of the signal from multiple blank samples (zero analyte concentration).
• LOD: Calculate using the formula LOD = 3σ / Sensitivity.
• SNR: For any given measurement, calculate as SNR = Signal / Noise [57].

4. Electroactive Surface Area (ESA) Normalization:

• Perform Cyclic Voltammetry (CV) in a solution containing a redox probe (e.g., [Fe(CN)₆]³⁻/⁴⁻).
• Use the Randles-Ševčík equation, which relates the peak current (ip) to the ESA: ip = (2.69×10⁵) × n³/² × A × D¹/² × C × v¹/², where:
  • n is the number of electrons transferred.
  • A is the ESA (cm²).
  • D is the diffusion coefficient (cm²/s).
  • C is the concentration (mol/cm³).
  • v is the scan rate (V/s) [57].
• Normalizing performance metrics (e.g., current, sensitivity) to the ESA allows for a more equitable comparison between different sensor designs and materials [57].

The Central Role of Surface Ligands in PbS QD Performance

Ligand Functions and Impact on Electronic Properties

In PbS QD solids, surface ligands are not merely passive stabilizers; they are integral to electronic properties. They passivate surface states to mitigate trap-mediated recombination, control inter-dot spacing which dictates charge carrier mobility, and influence doping density [41]. The choice of ligand directly impacts key figure of merits for both PVs and biosensors.

For Photovoltaics: Short, conductive ligands boost charge transport between QDs, directly enhancing the photocurrent and fill factor of a solar cell. A 2018 study demonstrated that changes in the size, shape, and functional groups of small-chain organic ligands enable the modulation of mobility and dielectric constant in PbS QD solids, which in turn governs device performance and recombination losses [41].

For Biosensors: Ligands provide chemical handles for functionalizing QDs with biorecognition elements (e.g., antibodies). They also determine the stability of QDs in biological fluids and influence the signal transduction pathway, for instance, by affecting electron transfer rates in electrochemical detection [41] [24].

Advanced Ligand Analysis via Multimodal NMR

Recent research has revealed that ligand binding is more complex than a simple two-state (bound/free) model. A 2025 study on PbS QDs capped with oleic acid (OAH) used multimodal Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to quantify three distinct ligand populations [24]:

• Strongly Bound (S_bound): Oleate (OA⁻) ions chemisorbed as X-type ligands on Pb-rich (111) facets.
• Weakly Bound (W_bound): OAH molecules coordinated through the acidic headgroup (-COOH) to (100) facets.
• Free: OAH molecules freely diffusing in solution.

Table 3: Research Reagent Solutions for PbS QD Ligand Studies

Reagent/Material	Function in Research	Impact on QD Properties
Lead Sulfide (PbS) QDs	Model semiconductor nanocrystal with a tunable infrared bandgap.	The core material whose optoelectronic properties are tailored via surface engineering [24].
Oleic Acid (OAH)/Oleate	Common native X-type ligand for synthesis and stabilization.	Provides initial colloidal stability; dynamic equilibrium between bound/free states affects film properties [24].
Deuterated Solvent (e.g., C₆D₆)	Solvent for NMR spectroscopy.	Allows for precise quantification of ligand populations and kinetics without interfering proton signals [24].
Short-Chain Ligands (e.g., Mercaptopropionic acid)	Ligand exchange reagent to replace native long-chain ligands.	Improves inter-dot charge transport by reducing tunneling barriers, crucial for PV device efficiency [41].
Bifunctional Ligands (e.g., Dithiols)	Molecular linkers for crosslinking QD solids.	Enhances mechanical stability and can improve electronic coupling between QDs [41].

Experimental Workflow for Ligand Population Analysis [24]:

• Sample Preparation: Purify OA-capped PbS QDs and re-dissolve in deuterated benzene (C₆D₆). Titrate with controlled amounts of excess OAH.
• 1H NMR Spectroscopy: Measure to identify and integrate resonances corresponding to different ligand states. The broadened peaks correspond to bound species.
• Diffusometry (DOSY): Use Diffusion-Ordered Spectroscopy to separate NMR signals based on diffusion coefficients. Free ligands diffuse rapidly, while bound ligands diffuse with the QD.
• Dynamic NMR & Line Shape Analysis: Perform variable-temperature NMR to quantify the rapid exchange kinetics (on the order of 0.09–2 ms) between the W_bound and Free ligand states.
• Population Quantification: Integrate data from spectroscopy and diffusometry to determine the fraction of ligands in each state (Sbound, Wbound, Free) as a function of temperature and OAH concentration.

This sophisticated understanding enables the rational design of QD surfaces. For example, engineering a surface with a higher ratio of strongly bound ligands can enhance stability, while manipulating the weakly bound population can fine-tune dynamic processes like sensing and charge transport.

Benchmarking the performance of photovoltaic cells and biosensors relies on a rigorous, standardized set of metrics and experimental protocols. For PVs, this centers on power conversion efficiency measured under STC, while for biosensors, it hinges on a triad of sensitivity, LOD, and SNR derived from calibration curves. In both fields, the transition from a research-grade curiosity to a viable technology is increasingly governed by the nanoscale interface. As detailed in the context of PbS QDs, surface ligands are a powerful tool for tuning electronic properties, governing charge transport, and functionalizing materials for specific applications. A deep and quantitative understanding of ligand chemistry, including complex binding equilibria and exchange kinetics, is therefore not an ancillary concern but a central pillar of innovation in the development of next-generation high-performance PV and biosensing devices.

The performance of perovskite quantum dots (PQDs) in advanced optoelectronic and potential biophotonic applications is predominantly governed by their surface chemistry. The ligands bound to the PQD surface serve as the primary interface between the nanocrystal and its environment, dictating not only fundamental electronic properties but also critical performance parameters such as specificity and cross-reactivity when integrated into complex systems. Specificity, in this context, refers to the ability of surface-modified PQDs to maintain their intended function—be it charge transport or targeted binding—without interference from competing environmental interactions. Cross-reactivity describes the phenomenon where surface sites interact non-specifically with multiple chemical species in the environment, leading to performance degradation, instability, or off-target effects. For PQDs to transition from laboratory curiosities to reliable components in devices such as sensors or imaging agents, rigorous validation of their performance in complex, multi-component matrices is essential. This guide provides a technical framework for researchers and drug development professionals to understand, quantify, and control these critical parameters through advanced surface ligand engineering.

Theoretical Foundations: Surface Chemistry and Interfacial Behavior

The surface of a PQD is a dynamic landscape where ligands exist in a state of equilibrium. As revealed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) studies on PbS QDs, the classic two-state model of "bound" and "free" ligands is an oversimplification. A more accurate description includes three distinct ligand states: strongly bound (chemisorbed) ligands, weakly bound (physisorbed) ligands, and free ligands in solution [24].

• Strongly Bound Ligands (S_bound): These ligands, typically X-type carboxylates like oleate (OA), are chemisorbed to Pb-rich (111) facets on the PQD surface through ionic or covalent bonds, providing essential electronic passivation of surface defects [24].
• Weakly Bound Ligands (W_bound): This population, exemplified by oleic acid (OAH) coordinated to (100) facets through the acidic headgroup, exhibits faster exchange rates (0.09–2 ms) and creates a dynamic equilibrium that can be exploited for further surface modification [24].
• Ligand Exchange Dynamics: The exchange between native and non-native ligands often proceeds through a two-step mechanism where incoming ligands first physisorb to the surface before achieving chemisorption, displacing the original ligands [24].

This complex binding equilibrium directly influences specificity and cross-reactivity. A surface rich in weakly bound ligands presents numerous sites for non-specific interactions with environmental species (e.g., solvents, ions, or biomolecules), leading to cross-reactivity. Conversely, a surface stabilized by strongly bound, tailored ligands exhibits higher specificity, maintaining its functional integrity in complex matrices.

Quantitative Analysis of Ligand Effects on PQD Properties

Systematic studies have quantified the impact of various ligand modifications on the optical and electronic properties of PQDs. The data below summarizes key findings from recent investigations, providing a benchmark for expected performance enhancements.

Table 1: Impact of Surface Ligands on CsPbI3 PQD Optical Properties and Stability [10]

Ligand Type	PL Enhancement (%)	Binding Mechanism	Photostability (PL Retention after 20 days UV)
l-Phenylalanine (L-PHE)	3%	Coordination with undercoordinated Pb²⁺ ions	>70%
Trioctylphosphine (TOP)	16%	Surface defect passivation	Data Not Specified
Trioctylphosphine Oxide (TOPO)	18%	Surface defect passivation	Data Not Specified

Table 2: Performance of PQD Solar Cells with Advanced Surface Ligand Engineering [2] [3] [1]

PQD System	Ligand Engineering Strategy	Key Achievement	Certified/Record Efficiency
CsPbI3 PQDs	Complementary dual-ligand reconstruction (TMO·BF4 & PEAI)	Improved inter-dot electronic coupling, uniform stacking	17.61% [2]
FAPbI3 PQDs	Consecutive surface matrix engineering (CSME)	Induced amidation between OA and OAm, enhanced ligand desorption	19.14% [3]
Hybrid FA0.47Cs0.53PbI3 PQDs	Alkali-augmented antisolvent hydrolysis (AAAH) with KOH/MeBz	Fewer trap-states, homogeneous orientations, minimal agglomeration	18.30% (certified) [1]

Experimental Protocols for Surface Engineering and Validation

Objective: To synthesize high-quality CsPbI3 PQDs with enhanced photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) and narrow emission linewidths through surface passivation.

Materials:

• Precursors: Cesium carbonate (Cs₂CO₃, 99%), Lead(II) iodide (PbI₂, 99%)
• Ligand Modifiers: Trioctylphosphine (TOP, 99%), Trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO, 99%), l-Phenylalanine (L-PHE, 98%)
• Solvent: 1-Octadecene (ODE)
• Reaction Vessel: Three-neck flask equipped with condenser and thermometer

Procedure:

• Preparation: Load Cs₂CO₃, PbI₂, and ligand modifiers (TOP, TOPO, or L-PHE) into a three-neck flask with ODE as the solvent.
• Synthesis: Precisely control reaction temperature at 170°C, utilizing a hot-injection volume of 1.5 mL for optimal PL intensity and full width at half maximum (FWHM).
• Purification: Purify the synthesized PQDs through precipitation and centrifugation cycles.
• Characterization:
  • Optical Analysis: Measure absorption and photoluminescence spectra to determine emission wavelength and FWHM.
  • PLQY Measurement: Use an integrating sphere to quantify photoluminescence quantum yield.
  • Stability Testing: Expose samples to continuous UV radiation and measure PL intensity retention over 20 days.

Objective: To implement a dual-ligand reconstruction strategy that stabilizes the PQD surface lattice and improves inter-dot electronic coupling.

Materials:

• Dual-Ligand System: Trimethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate (TMO·BF4) and Phenylethylammonium iodide (PEAI)
• Solvent: Appropriate antisolvent for ligand exchange

Procedure:

• PQD Preparation: Synthesize CsPbI3 PQDs following standard hot-injection methods.
• Ligand Exchange: Treat PQD surfaces with the TMO·BF4 and PEAI complementary ligand system.
• Characterization:
  • Structural Analysis: Use X-ray diffraction (XRD) to confirm perovskite phase purity.
  • Surface Analysis: Employ Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) to verify ligand binding.
  • Morphological Study: Use transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to assess PQD dispersion and size distribution.
  • Device Fabrication: Assemble PQD solar cells to evaluate photovoltaic performance.

Objective: To enhance the hydrolysis of ester antisolvents for efficient substitution of insulating pristine ligands with conductive short ligands.

Materials:

• Antisolvent: Methyl benzoate (MeBz)
• Alkaline Source: Potassium hydroxide (KOH)
• PQD System: Hybrid FA0.47Cs0.53PbI3 PQDs

Procedure:

• Film Preparation: Spin-coat PQD colloids into solid films on substrates.
• Alkaline Treatment: Incorporate KOH into the MeBz antisolvent to create an alkaline environment.
• Interlayer Rinsing: Rinse the PQD solid films with the KOH/MeBz solution under ambient conditions (~30% relative humidity).
• Characterization:
  • Thermodynamic Studies: Calculate the change in activation energy for ester hydrolysis.
  • Performance Testing: Fabricate solar cell devices and measure power conversion efficiency.
  • Stability Assessment: Monitor device performance under continuous illumination and storage conditions.

Visualization of Experimental Workflows and Ligand Binding Mechanisms

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Critical Reagents for PQD Surface Engineering and Validation

Reagent Category	Specific Examples	Function & Importance	Application Context
Passivating Ligands	Trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO), l-Phenylalanine (L-PHE)	Suppress non-radiative recombination by coordinating with undercoordinated Pb²⁺ ions and surface defects [10]	Enhancing PLQY and environmental stability of CsPbI3 PQDs
Dual-Ligand Systems	Trimethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate (TMO·BF4), Phenylethylammonium iodide (PEAI)	Form complementary systems on PQD surface through hydrogen bonds, stabilizing surface lattice and improving inter-dot electronic coupling [2]	Creating high-performance PQD solids for solar cells (achieving 17.61% efficiency)
Alkaline Augmentation Agents	Potassium hydroxide (KOH) with methyl benzoate (MeBz)	Facilitate rapid ester hydrolysis, enabling substitution of insulating ligands with conductive counterparts; lowers activation energy by ~9-fold [1]	Interlayer rinsing of PQD solids to achieve dense conductive capping (18.3% certified efficiency)
Antisolvents	Methyl benzoate (MeBz), Methyl acetate (MeOAc)	Remove pristine ligands during interlayer rinsing without disrupting perovskite core; hydrolyze to generate short conductive ligands [1]	Layer-by-layer deposition of PQD solid films for photovoltaic devices
Characterization Tools	NMR spectroscopy & diffusometry, PL spectroscopy, XRD	Quantify ligand populations and exchange kinetics; assess optical properties and structural phase purity [10] [24]	Validation of surface chemistry modifications and correlation with device performance

The path to reliable perovskite quantum dot integration in complex systems demands a systematic approach to surface ligand engineering. As detailed in this guide, successful validation of specificity and minimization of cross-reactivity hinge on several key principles: (1) comprehensive understanding of the multi-state nature of ligand binding, (2) strategic implementation of dual-ligand or alkaline-augmented exchange protocols to create stable, conductive surfaces, and (3) rigorous quantification of both optical properties and device performance under realistic operating conditions. The experimental protocols and characterization methodologies outlined herein provide a robust framework for researchers to develop PQD materials with predictable, stable performance in complex matrices—a critical advancement toward their successful implementation in next-generation optoelectronic devices and potential biomedical applications.

Conclusion

Surface ligand engineering is unequivocally a cornerstone for harnessing the full potential of perovskite quantum dots in biomedical and clinical applications. The foundational principles establish that ligands are not mere stabilizers but active components that control electronic properties, from charge transport to trap state passivation. Methodological advances, particularly dual-ligand systems and alkali-enhanced treatments, demonstrate a clear path toward achieving superior conductivity and environmental stability. The validation of these strategies through high-performance biosensors and solar cells confirms their transformative impact. Future directions should focus on developing novel, multifunctional ligands that confer targeting capabilities for specific biomarkers, enhance biocompatibility for in vivo use, and further improve charge extraction efficiencies. The convergence of ligand design with biomedical engineering promises a new era of highly sensitive, stable, and specific diagnostic and therapeutic tools, ultimately advancing personalized medicine and clinical diagnostics.

References

• 1. Enriching conductive capping by alkaline treatment of ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-63618-5]
• 2. Complementary Dual-Ligands Resurfacing CsPbI3 ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40465317/]
• 3. Consecutive surface matrix engineering of FAPbI 3 ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ee/d5ee02127h]
• 4. Stabilized Perovskite Quantum Dot Solids via Nonpolar ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10427392/]
• 5. Surface Ligands for Perovskite Quantum Dots [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39354813/]
• 6. Hydrogen's Multifaceted Role in Passivation, H-Induced ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10823530/]
• 7. In Situ Epitaxial Quantum Dot Passivation Enables Highly ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/15/13/978]
• 8. Dimensional tunability in SN2-based synthesis of CsPbI3 ... [https://www.sciopen.com/article/10.26599/NR.2025.94907968]
• 9. Surface ligand engineering-assisted CsPbI 3 quantum dots ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1385894720326917]
• 10. Effect of Surface Ligand Modification on the Optical ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2468023025023211]
• 11. Multidentate ligand approach for conjugation of perovskite ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0021979721009620]
• 12. Surface ligands increase photoexcitation relaxation rates in ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22742432/]
• 13. Ligand Bonding Changes in QD Excited States Depend on ... [https://magnitudeinstruments.com/ligand-bonding-changes-in-qd-excited-states-depend-on-their-surface-chemistry/]
• 14. Sequential solid-state multiligand exchange of FAPbI 3 ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/tc/d5tc00040h]
• 15. Boosting carrier transport via functionalized short-chain ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1385894724090879]
• 16. Ligand-Enhanced Neodymium Doping of Perovskite ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10744661/]
• 17. Alkylammonium ligands-driven perovskite lattice ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1385894725118068]
• 18. Deep Eutectic Solvent-Mediated Ligand Engineering for ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123025028142]
• 19. Nanomaterials: Surface Area to Volume Ratio [https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/nanomaterials-surface-area-to-volume-ratio-jmsn-1000159-135592.html]
• 20. Ligands of Nanoparticles and Their Influence on the ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11510505/]
• 21. Pioneering perovskite quantum dot nanosensors for heavy ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/ra/d5ra06200d?page=search]
• 22. Ligand engineering of perovskite quantum dots for efficient and stable solar cells - ScienceDirect [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2095495622000730]
• 23. Effect of Surface Ligand Modification on the Optical ... [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5480005]
• 24. Ligand Exchange and Binding at the Surface of PbS ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12333426/]
• 25. Unveiling non-radiative center control in CsPbBr 3 ... [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12274-023-6326-2]
• 26. Next-Generation Biosensing with Perovskite Quantum Dots [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872204025001860]
• 27. Bromide Perovskite Quantum Dot Fluorescent Sensors for ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666154325008488]
• 28. Understanding how different surface ligands can influence ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2468023025005838]
• 29. Article Understanding the ligand-assisted reprecipitation of ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590238523002412]
• 30. The role of surface ligands in determining the electronic ... [https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-role-of-surface-ligands-in-determining-the-of-Goswami-Mandal/5e1421650ddbab1189f8a27d65fe04b25e6ea521]
• 31. LABind: identifying protein binding ligand-aware sites via ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-62899-0]
• 32. Impact of Molecular Ligands in the Synthesis and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9718301/]
• 33. First-principles study of electronic properties of amine ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169433222016075]
• 34. Zwitterionic hydrogels and their biomedical applications [https://www.oaepublish.com/articles/cs.2023.50]
• 35. Zwitterionic polymer/ polydopamine coating reduce acute ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6896321/]
• 36. Ligand Engineering of Inorganic Lead Halide Perovskite ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11280295/]
• 37. Uncovering the Performance Enhancing Mechanism of ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39772409/]
• 38. Ultrasensitive dopamine detection using CsPbBr3- PQD -COF... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12136283/]
• 39. An Updated Review on Electrochemical Nanobiosensors ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6374/13/9/892]
• 40. Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Biosensors for Enhanced ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12564411/]
• 41. The role of surface ligands in determining the electronic ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2018/nr/c7nr06116a]
• 42. Multifaceted anchoring ligands for uniform orientation and ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1385894724058017]
• 43. Modified surface ligand management of CsPbI 3 perovskite ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1566119924000570]
• 44. Suppressing non-radiative recombination for efficient and ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/ee/d4ee02917h]
• 45. Ligand Engineering of Inorganic Lead Halide Perovskite ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/14/14/1201]
• 46. Classifying the Role of Surface Ligands on the Passivation ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10892567/]
• 47. Dual ligand passivation on improving photovoltaic ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022459625000283]
• 48. Advances in Perovskite Quantum Dot Optoelectronics [https://insights.pluto.im/advances-in-perovskite-quantum-dot-optoelectronics-towards-high-performance-leds-and-solar-cells/]
• 49. Cascade surface modification of colloidal quantum dot inks ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-13437-2]
• 50. Liquid bidentate ligand for full ligand coverage towards efficient near-infrared perovskite quantum dot LEDs | Light: Science & Applications [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41377-024-01704-x]
• 51. Solution Processing and Self-Organization of PbS Quantum Dots Passivated with Formamidinium Lead Iodide (FAPbI3) - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7331203/]
• 52. Quantum dot nanomaterials: Empowering advances in ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666821125000018]
• 53. Entropy of Branching Out: Linear versus Branched Alkylthiols ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8945696/]
• 54. Ultrasensitive dopamine detection using CsPbBr 3 -PQD ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ra/d5ra02376a]
• 55. Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart | Photovoltaic Research [https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency]
• 56. Parametric optimization and sensitivity analysis of ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174525004817]
• 57. Understanding sensitivity in biosensors - metrics, surface ... [https://blog.igii.uk/understanding-sensitivity-in-biosensors-metrics-surface-area-and-detection-principles]
• 58. A Review of Graphene-Integrated Biosensors for Non-Invasive ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12608150/]